An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital

Last updated

An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital
An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital.jpg
Cover art for the 2012 English edition
Author Michael Heinrich
Original titleKritik der politischen Ökonomie: Eine Einführung
TranslatorAlexander Locascio
Country Germany
Subject Social sciences, economic theory, demography, capital, capitalism
Published2004 (Schmetterling Verlag)
Published in English
2012 (Monthly Review Press)
Pages
  • 220 (Original)
  • 240 (English)
ISBN 978-1-58367-289-1
335.4/1
LC Class HB501.M37 H4513 2012
Text An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital at Internet Archive

An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital (German : Kritik der politischen Ökonomie: Eine Einführung) is a book by German Marxist scholar Michael Heinrich examining the three volumes of Karl Marx's major economic work Capital. Published in German in 2004, the book is structured as a shortened account of Marx's analysis of capitalism, and is written from the standpoint of the Neue Marx-Lektüre school of thought, criticising both Marxist and bourgeois readings of Marx. [1] [2] The book was first published in Germany by Schmetterling Verlag  [ de ] and became one of the most popular introductions to Capital in the country. [3] It was the first of Heinrich's works to be translated into English, with a 2012 edition by Monthly Review Press. [4]

Contents

Background

Heinrich in 2014 Michael Heinrich 2014 in Zagreb.jpg
Heinrich in 2014

Michael Heinrich published An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital in 2004 while working as a lecturer in economics at HTW Berlin. [5] He was the managing editor of PROKLA: Journal for Critical Social Science  [ de ] until 2014 and was a contributor to the Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA; lit. 'Marx-Engels Complete Writings'). [6] [5] In a 2011 interview, Heinrich stated that the aim of the book was to present Marx's Capital and other basic elements of Marx's theory to new readers. [7]

The foundations for the book were laid in his 1991 [note 1] PhD thesis The Science of Value (German: Die Wissenschaft vom Wert) [7] which, along with the Introduction, was published as part of a wider discourse in Germany on the monetary character of Marx's theory of value. [9] This revival of research into Marx, known as the Neue Marx-Lektüre (lit. 'New Reading of Marx'), was based on the earlier work of Western Marxists like Theodor Adorno and Louis Althusser and was initiated by West German scholars Hans-Georg Backhaus and Helmut Reichelt during the 1960s and 1970s. [10] [9] The Neue Marx-Lektüre involved a re-examination of Marx's auxiliary texts and the theoretical distinctions between the different editions of Capital that were published in the second edition of MEGA in 1975. [11]

As part of the Neue Marx-Lektüre, the book rejects "worldview Marxism" (German: Weltanschauungsmarxismus), which Heinrich characterises as a reading of Marx marked by its oversimplification of social phenomena as the result of purely economic interests, its historical determinism, and view of Marx's theories as "all-encompassing". [10] [12] In the book, Heinrich attributes the development of "worldview Marxism" to the contributions of Friedrich Engels and Karl Kautsky following Marx's death that were later incorporated into Marxism–Leninism. [10] The book contests that Marx had adopted the ideas of classical economics and its labour theory of value in an attempt to build an alternative political economy and instead argues that Marx's project was based on a critique of the presuppositions of all established economic science. [13] [14] [15]

Following the 1993 publication of the original economic manuscripts for Volumes II and III of Capital in MEGA, Heinrich argued that Engels had distorted Marx's manuscripts as part of his attempt to publish a coherent third volume. [16] This stance was met with harsh criticism and generated a number of defences of Engels's editorial work. [17] In the book, Heinrich argues that Capital was a fragmented and unfinished work that therefore included concepts that that needed to be redesigned to be used for concrete economic analysis. [18] [19] [20]

Summary

Heinrich's Introduction is organised around various themes in Marx's work, and draws on his unfinished manuscripts the Grundrisse and Theories of Surplus Value in addition to its reading of Capital. [21] Chapters 1 and 2 of the book introduce and place the book within the wider Marxist corpus. Chapters 3–5 discuss Capital Volume I, chapter 6 discusses Volume II, and chapters 7–10 discuss Volume III; chapters 11 and 12 discuss theories of the state and communism, respectively. [5] The book also incorporates an analysis of the differences between the various revisions made by Marx to Capital, [11] [22] as well as a wide range of historical documents. [1]

Like other Neue Marx-Lektüre adherents, Heinrich favours a monetary reading of Marx's theory of value, arguing against conventional conceptions of Marx's theory of value, where the value of a commodity is derived from its socially necessary labour time. Against readings of Marx's theory of value as a labour theory of value, [23] Heinrich argues that Marx's value theory conceptualises value as a historical social relation where an individual commodity has tangible value only through the act of exchange. [24] [25] [26] By calling value and price two different levels of abstraction, [27] Heinrich's reading of Marx sidesteps the transformation problem, a commonly raised criticism of Marx's Capital on the difficulty of establishing a consistent relationship between value and price. [4] [28]

The book devotes special attention to the concepts of fetishism and reification to correct common misconceptions that confuse the concepts with false consciousness, alienation, or simple consumerism. [29] [24] Heinrich argues that Marx's theory of fetishism constitutes a theory of social domination that applies not just to commodities, but to capital and to "social relations in bourgeois society" as well. [4] [24]

Heinrich also rejects the significance of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall in Marx's theory of crisis. He argues against popular interpretations that suggest a law between a rise in the organic composition of capital and a fall in the rate of profit, which fail to consider the contradictory effects that capitalist development can have on the rate of profit. [30] [31]

Reception

The Introduction has been praised for its systematic examination of Marx and for its comprehensive inclusion of Volumes II and III of Marx's Capital, in contrast to many other books on Marx's critique of political economy which primarily write about Volume I. [5] Heinrich insists in the book that a reading of Capital must include Volumes II and III to not be subject to distortion. [32] Academic Johan Fornäs  [ sv ] praised the book for its attention to detail on the various differences between the different editions of Marx's Capital. [22] In Germany, the book has been reprinted many times and is widely used in universities and Capital reading groups. [33]

Author Doug Henwood praised the book as one of the best short introductions to Marx's Capital. [34] Writing in Historical Materialism , historian Guido Starosta praised Heinrich's commentary on commodity fetishism for its rigour, contrasting it from David Harvey's A Companion to Marx's Capital , which he criticised for trivialising commodity fetishism. [35] Similarly, Chris O'Kane, writing in the Marx & Philosophy Review of Books , and Petrino DiLeo, writing in the International Socialist Review, both praised Heinrich's treatment of fetishism for its lucidity. [24] [4]

The Marxian economist Paul Cockshott praised the Introduction for its clarity while criticising Heinrich's interpretation of Marx, arguing that Heinrich's break from conventional interpretations of Marx would detach the scientific method from the labour theory of value. [36] Sociologist John Holloway likewise praised the book as "impressively clear", but said he did not share its interpretation of Marx. [37] Social scientist Christian Fuchs criticised the book for suggesting that Heinrich's reading of Marx is universally accepted and the one correct reading of Marx. [38] [39] Fuchs also took issue with Heinrich's understanding of value as the product of exchange, arguing that Heinrich's approach would suggest that "no exploitation has taken place if a commodity is not sold". [38]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Expanded and republished in 1999 [8]

Citations

  1. 1 2 Sica 2012, p. 838.
  2. ↑ Hoff 2012, p. 201.
  3. ↑ Burghardt 2018, p. 219.
  4. 1 2 3 4 DiLeo 2013.
  5. 1 2 3 4 Basu 2015, p. 25.
  6. ↑ Heinrich 2020.
  7. 1 2 Heinrich 2011, p. 709.
  8. ↑ Heinrich 2011, p. 708.
  9. 1 2 Hoff 2012, pp. 198–199.
  10. 1 2 3 Basu 2015, p. 26.
  11. 1 2 Hoff 2012, pp. 199–200.
  12. ↑ Heinrich 2012, p. 24.
  13. ↑ Basu 2015, pp. 26–27.
  14. ↑ Heinrich 2012, pp. 32–34.
  15. ↑ Heinrich 2012, pp. 9.
  16. ↑ Dellheim & Wolf 2018, p. 2; Bellofiore & Wolf 2018, p. 32.
  17. ↑ Dellheim & Wolf 2018, p. 2.
  18. ↑ Post 2013.
  19. ↑ Heinrich 2011, p. 710.
  20. ↑ Saito 2018, p. 188.
  21. ↑ Paulson 2013, p. 175.
  22. 1 2 Fornäs 2013, p. 295.
  23. ↑ Cockshott 2013, p. 295.
  24. 1 2 3 4 O'Kane 2013.
  25. ↑ Pitts 2017, p. 25.
  26. ↑ Fuchs 2014, p. 41.
  27. ↑ Heinrich 2012, p. 149.
  28. ↑ Paulson 2013, pp. 175–176.
  29. ↑ Paulson 2013, p. 176.
  30. ↑ Pitts 2017, pp. 126–132.
  31. ↑ Lange 2018, p. 413.
  32. ↑ Paulson 2013, pp. 174–175.
  33. ↑ Oittinen & Rauhala 2013, pp. 175–176.
  34. ↑ Sica 2012, p. 837.
  35. ↑ Starosta 2017, p. 106.
  36. ↑ Cockshott 2013, p. 287.
  37. ↑ Holloway 2015, p. 20.
  38. 1 2 Fuchs 2016, p. 60.
  39. ↑ Fuchs 2013, pp. 300, 306.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karl Marx</span> German-born philosopher (1818–1883)

Karl Marx was a German-born philosopher, economist, political theorist, historian, sociologist, journalist, and revolutionary socialist. His best-known works are the 1848 pamphlet The Communist Manifesto and the three-volume Das Kapital (1867–1894); the latter employs his critical approach of historical materialism in an analysis of capitalism and represents his greatest intellectual achievement. Marx's ideas and theories and their subsequent development, collectively known as Marxism, have exerted enormous influence on modern intellectual, economic and political history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commodity</span> Fungible item produced to satisfy wants or needs

In economics, a commodity is an economic good, usually a resource, that specifically has full or substantial fungibility: that is, the market treats instances of the good as equivalent or nearly so with no regard to who produced them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Commodity fetishism</span> Concept in Marxist analysis

In Marxist philosophy, the term commodity fetishism describes the economic relationships of production and exchange as being social relationships that exist among things and not as relationships that exist among people. As a form of reification, commodity fetishism presents economic value as inherent to the commodities, and not as arising from the workforce, from the human relations that produced the commodity, the goods and the services.

Use value or value in use is a concept in classical political economy and Marxist economics. It refers to the tangible features of a commodity which can satisfy some human requirement, want or need, or which serves a useful purpose. In Karl Marx's critique of political economy, any product has a labor-value and a use-value, and if it is traded as a commodity in markets, it additionally has an exchange value, defined as the proportion by which a commodity can be exchanged for other entities, most often expressed as a money-price.

Moishe Postone was a Canadian historian and social theorist. He was a professor of history at the University of Chicago, where he was part of the Committee on Jewish Studies.

Fictitious capital is a concept used by Karl Marx in his critique of political economy. It is introduced in chapter 25 of the third volume of Capital. Fictitious capital contrasts with what Marx calls "real capital", which is capital actually invested in physical means of production and workers, and "money capital", which is actual funds being held. The market value of fictitious capital assets varies according to the expected return or yield of those assets in the future, which Marx felt was only indirectly related to the growth of real production. Effectively, fictitious capital represents "accumulated claims, legal titles, to future production" and more specifically claims to the income generated by that production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abstract labour and concrete labour</span> Distinction made by Karl Marx

Abstract labour and concrete labour refer to a distinction made by Karl Marx in his critique of political economy. It refers to the difference between human labour in general as economically valuable worktime versus human labour as a particular activity that has a specific useful effect within the (capitalist) mode of production.

The tendency of the rate of profit to fall (TRPF) is a theory in the crisis theory of political economy, according to which the rate of profit—the ratio of the profit to the amount of invested capital—decreases over time. This hypothesis gained additional prominence from its discussion by Karl Marx in Chapter 13 of Capital, Volume III, but economists as diverse as Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, David Ricardo and William Stanley Jevons referred explicitly to the TRPF as an empirical phenomenon that demanded further theoretical explanation, although they differed on the reasons why the TRPF should necessarily occur.

Helmut Reichelt is a German Marxian critic of political economy, sociologist and philosopher. Reichelt is one of the main authors of the “Neue Marx-Lektüre” and considered to be one of the most important theorists in the field of Marx's theory of value.

In classical political economy and especially Karl Marx's critique of political economy, a commodity is any good or service produced by human labour and offered as a product for general sale on the market. Some other priced goods are also treated as commodities, e.g. human labor-power, works of art and natural resources, even though they may not be produced specifically for the market, or be non-reproducible goods. This problem was extensively debated by Adam Smith, David Ricardo, and Karl Rodbertus-Jagetzow, among others. Value and price are not equivalent terms in economics, and theorising the specific relationship of value to market price has been a challenge for both liberal and Marxist economists.

<i>Das Kapital, Volume II</i> 1885 book by Karl Marx

Capital. A Critique of Political Economy. Volume II: The Process of Circulation of Capital is the second of three volumes of Capital: Critique of Political Economy. It was prepared by Friedrich Engels from notes left by Karl Marx and published in 1885.

Critique of political economy or simply the first critique of economy is a form of social critique that rejects the conventional ways of distributing resources. The critique also rejects what its advocates believe are unrealistic axioms, faulty historical assumptions, and taking conventional economic mechanisms as a given or as transhistorical. The critique asserts the conventional economy is merely one of many types of historically specific ways to distribute resources, which emerged along with modernity.

Neue Marx-Lektüre or NML is a revival and interpretation of Karl Marx's critique of political economy, which originated during the mid-1960s in both Western and Eastern Europe and opposed both Marxist–Leninist and social democratic interpretations of Marx. Neue Marx-Lektüre covers a loose group of authors primarily from German-speaking countries who reject certain historicizing and empiricist interpretations of Marx's analysis of economic forms, many of which are argued to spring from Friedrich Engels role in the early Marxist workers' movement.

<i>Theories of Surplus Value</i> Literary work by Karl Marx

Theories of Surplus Value is a draft manuscript written by Karl Marx between January 1862 and July 1863. It is mainly concerned with the Western European theorizing about Mehrwert from about 1750, critically examining the ideas of British, French and German political economists about wealth creation and the profitability of industries. At issue are the source, forms and determinants of the magnitude of surplus-value and Marx tries to explain how after failing to solve basic contradictions in its labour theories of value the classical school of political economy eventually broke up, leaving only "vulgar political economy" which no longer tried to provide a consistent, integral theory of capitalism, but instead offered only an eclectic amalgam of theories which seemed pragmatically useful or which justified the rationality of the market economy.

In Marxist philosophy, reification is the process by which human social relations are perceived as inherent attributes of the people involved in them, or attributes of some product of the relation, such as a traded commodity.

<i>Das Kapital</i> Foundational theoretical text of Karl Marx

Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, also known as Capital, is a foundational theoretical text in materialist philosophy and critique of political economy written by Karl Marx, published as three volumes in 1867, 1885, and 1894. The culmination of his life's work, the text contains Marx's analysis of capitalism, to which he sought to apply his theory of historical materialism "to lay bare the economic laws of modern society", following from classical political economists such as Adam Smith, Jean-Baptiste Say, David Ricardo and John Stuart Mill. The text's second and third volumes were completed from Marx's notes after his death and published by his colleague Friedrich Engels. Das Kapital is the most cited book in the social sciences published before 1950.

Marxian economics, or the Marxian school of economics, is a heterodox school of political economic thought. Its foundations can be traced back to Karl Marx's critique of political economy. However, unlike critics of political economy, Marxian economists tend to accept the concept of the economy prima facie. Marxian economics comprises several different theories and includes multiple schools of thought, which are sometimes opposed to each other; in many cases Marxian analysis is used to complement, or to supplement, other economic approaches. Because one does not necessarily have to be politically Marxist to be economically Marxian, the two adjectives coexist in usage, rather than being synonymous: They share a semantic field, while also allowing both connotative and denotative differences.

<i>A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy</i> Essay by Karl Marx

A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy is a book by Karl Marx, first published in 1859. The book is mainly a critique of political economy achieved by critiquing the writings of the leading theoretical exponents of capitalism at that time: these were the political economists, nowadays often referred to as the classical economists; Adam Smith (1723–90) and David Ricardo (1772–1823) are the foremost representatives of the genre.

There are five main lines of scholarly criticism of Marx's idea of the form of value.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Heinrich</span> German political scientist

Michael Heinrich is a German historian of philosophy, political scientist, and mathematician, specialising in the critical study of the development of Marx's thought. Heinrich's work, influenced by Elmar Altvater and the Neue Marx-Lektüre of Hans-Georg Backhaus and Helmut Reichelt is characterised by its focus on the points of ambivalence and inconsistency in the work of Marx. Through this theme, Heinrich challenges both the closed system he identifies with "worldview Marxism", as well as teleological narratives of Marx's intellectual development throughout his life. He is best known for his 1991 study of the theoretical field of classical political economy The Science of Value, his introductory text to the critique of political economy An Introduction to the Three Volumes of Karl Marx's Capital, and his ongoing project to produce a multi-volume biography of Marx, of which the first volume of a projected four was published in 2020.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.