Appeals from the Crown Court

Last updated

This article concerns appeals against decisions of the Crown Court of England and Wales. The majority of appeals against Crown Court decisions are heard by the Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal.

Contents

Jurisdiction of the Court of Appeal and divisional courts

The Court of Appeal has jurisdiction to hear the following appeals:

Following trial on indictmentAppeals against conviction on indictment Appeals against conviction on indictment may only be made with a certificate of the trial judge or leave of the Court of Appeal. An application for leave must be submitted with written reasons within 28 days of conviction. If leave is refused by a single judge on the papers, the applicant has a right to have the matter determined by a two-judge or full court. [1] An applicant may normally only appeal once against conviction, even if new evidence has arisen. [2]

The Court of Appeal will quash the conviction if it was unsafe. [3]

A conviction may be unsafe despite the applicant having pleaded guilty where:

  • the plea was equivocal or mistaken or;
  • the effect of an incorrect ruling of law on admitted facts was to leave an accused with no legal escape from a verdict of guilty on those facts. [4] However, But a conviction would not normally be unsafe where an accused is influenced to change his plea to guilty because he recognizes that, as a result of a ruling to admit strong evidence against him, his case on the facts is hopeless. [4]

A conviction may be unsafe even if the appellant admitted his guilt at trial if an application that there was no case to answer was wrongly refused. A conviction obtained on this basis is an abuse of process. [5]

Following a successful appeal, the appellant must be acquitted. [3] The Court of Appeal may order a retrial where the interests of justice so require. [6] The appellant may only be retried for an offence of which he could have been convicted in the original trial. [6] The defendant must be arraigned within two months unless the Court of Appeal orders otherwise. [7]

The Court of Appeal may substitute for the verdict found by the jury a verdict of guilty of another offence, if the jury could have found him guilty of that offence and it appears to the Court of Appeal that the jury must have been satisfied of facts which proved him guilty of the other offence. [8]

Where the Court of Appeal substitutes a conviction for another offence or quashes some of the convictions but not others, the Court of Appeal may sentence the offender. [9]

Appeals against sentence following conviction on indictment A person convicted in the Crown Court may only appeal against sentence with a certificate of the trial judge or leave of the Court of Appeal. [10] For this purpose, sentence includes any order made by a court when dealing with the offender. [11]

The Court of Appeal may quash any sentence which is the subject of the appeal and in place of it pass such sentence as they think is appropriate, so long as taking the case as a whole, the appellant is not dealt with more severely by the Court of Appeal than by the Crown Court. [12]

Appeals against findings of unfitness to plead [13]
Appeals against verdicts of not guilty by reason of insanity [14]
Following trial in a magistrates' court Appeals against sentence passed by the Crown Court following committal for sentence by the magistrates' court.
Serious fraud casesAppeals against rulings made at preparatory hearings in cases of serious fraud. [15]
References by the Attorney-GeneralOpinions on points of law following the acquittal of a defendant. [16]
Appeals against unduly lenient sentences in relation to offences triable only on indictment, and in relation to certain specified either way offences. [17]
References by the Criminal Cases Review Commission Appeals [18]
No valid trial at allWrit of venire de novoThe following are categories of cases where the trial is a nullity and thus a writ of venire de novo may be granted:
  • where there was an error in the plea of the defendant or doubt about what the true plea was;
  • where defendants have been improperly joined;
  • where there was failure to take the verdict of the jury on a change of plea from not guilty to guilt;
  • where there was an irregularity in the committal proceedings;
  • where the wrong person takes the place of a juror;
  • where there was a denial of the right to challenge a juror;
  • where the judge was not qualified to act as a judge in the matter; and
  • where the verdict of the jury was so ambiguous or ill-expressed that no judgment could properly be given on it. [19]

A divisional court of the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court has jurisdiction to hear appeals by way of case stated [20] and applications for judicial review, [21] where the Crown Court is conducting an appeal against a decision of a magistrates' court.

Appeals to the Court of Appeal

Composition of the court

Matters which must be dealt with by the full court

The full court is a court comprising an uneven number of judges (at least 3), which gives judgment by majority.

Matters which may be dealt with by two judges

If the judges cannot agree, the matter must be reheard before a full court.

Matters which may be dealt with by a single judge
* an appeal against conviction;
  • an appeal against a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity;
  • an appeal against a finding of unfitness to plead;
  • a review of sentencing following a reference by the Attorney General;
  • an application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court; and
  • refusing an application for leave to appeal where the application has been refused by a single judge. [22]

Any matter which need not be dealt with by the full court, including:

  • an appeal against sentence brought by the defendant;
  • refusing an application for leave to appeal where the application has been refused by a single judge;
  • granting leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal;
  • dealing with all interlocutory applications; and
  • directing that the Criminal Cases Review Commission investigate a particular issue. [19]
* granting leave to appeal;
  • extending the time period for making an application for leave to appeal;
  • directing that an appellant in custody may be present at the proceedings (where he does not automatically have that right);
  • ordering a witness to attend for examination;
  • granting, revoking or varying the conditions of an appellant's bail;
  • ordering that the time in which the appellant was in custody pending appeal should not count towards the satisfaction of his sentence (on the ground that the appeal was frivolous or vexatious, meaning there was no realistic prospect of success; [23]
  • directing that evidence should be received;
  • directing that documentary or real evidence should be produced or that a witness should be examined;
  • directing that the victim of a sexual offence should not be anonymous;
  • ordering the payment of costs;
  • giving leave for any person to be present at an appeal; and
  • suspending a person's driving disqualification. [24]

Related Research Articles

Breach of the peace or disturbing the peace, is a legal term used in constitutional law in English-speaking countries and in a public order sense in the several jurisdictions of the United Kingdom. It is a form of disorderly conduct.

Assault occasioning grievous bodily harm is a term used in English criminal law to describe the severest forms of battery. It refers to two offences that are created by sections 18 and 20 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861. The distinction between these two sections is the requirement of specific intent for section 18; the offence under section 18 is variously referred to as "wounding with intent" or "causing grievous bodily harm with intent", whereas the offence under section 20 is variously referred to as "unlawful wounding", "malicious wounding" or "inflicting grievous bodily harm".

In Canada and England and Wales, certain convicted persons may be designated as dangerous offenders and subject to a longer, or indefinite, term of imprisonment in order to protect the public. Dangerousness in law is a legal establishment of the risk that a person poses to cause harm. Other countries, including Denmark, Norway, and parts of the United States have similar provisions of law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts of Scotland</span> Administration of justice in Scotland

The courts of Scotland are responsible for administration of justice in Scotland, under statutory, common law and equitable provisions within Scots law. The courts are presided over by the judiciary of Scotland, who are the various judicial office holders responsible for issuing judgments, ensuring fair trials, and deciding on sentencing. The Court of Session is the supreme civil court of Scotland, subject to appeals to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, and the High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court, which is only subject to the authority of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on devolution issues and human rights compatibility issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proceeds of Crime Act 2002</span> British statute law on confiscation and money laundering

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) is an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom which provides for the confiscation or civil recovery of the proceeds from crime and contains the principal money laundering legislation in the UK.

Assault occasioning actual bodily harm is a statutory offence of aggravated assault in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, the Australian Capital Territory, New South Wales, Hong Kong and the Solomon Islands. It has been abolished in the Republic of Ireland and in South Australia, but replaced with a similar offence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Devolved, reserved and excepted matters</span> UK public policy areas

In the United Kingdom, devolved matters are the areas of public policy where the Parliament of the United Kingdom has devolved its legislative power to the national legislatures of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, while reserved matters and excepted matters are the areas where the UK Parliament retains exclusive power to legislate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice Act 2003</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice Act 2003 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is a wide-ranging measure introduced to modernise many areas of the criminal justice system in England and Wales and, to a lesser extent, in Scotland and Northern Ireland. Large portions of the act were repealed and replaced by the Sentencing Act 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corrupt practices</span>

Corrupt practices in English election law includes bribery, treating, undue influence, personation, and aiding, abetting, counselling and procuring personation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prevention of Corruption Act 1906</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Prevention of Corruption Act 1906 was an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. It was the second of three pieces of legislation regarding corruption which after 1916 were collectively referred to as the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889 to 1916. It was repealed by the Bribery Act 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Emergency Workers (Obstruction) Act 2006</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Emergency Services (Obstruction) Act 2006 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It is intended to reduce the instances of obstruction of, or assaults on, emergency service personnel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Race Relations Act 1976</span> Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom

The Race Relations Act 1976 was established by the Parliament of the United Kingdom to prevent discrimination on the grounds of race. The scope of the legislation included discrimination on the grounds of race, colour, nationality, ethnic and national origin in the fields of employment, the provision of goods and services, education and public functions.

An offensive weapon is a tool made, adapted or intended for the purpose of inflicting physical injury upon another person.

The right to silence in England and Wales is the protection given to a person during criminal proceedings from adverse consequences of remaining silent. It is sometimes referred to as the privilege against self-incrimination. It is used on any occasion when it is considered the person being spoken to is under suspicion of having committed one or more criminal offences and consequently thus potentially being subject to criminal proceedings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forfeiture Act 1870</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Forfeiture Act 1870 is a British Act of Parliament that abolished the automatic forfeiture of goods and land as a punishment for treason and felony. It does not apply to Scotland, which did not fully abolish forfeiture until the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1949. Prior to the Act being passed, a person convicted of treason or felony automatically and permanently forfeited all of his lands and possessions to the Crown. The old offence of praemunire, which was also punished with forfeiture, was only a misdemeanour, and so the Act did not apply to it.

R v Davis [2008] UKHL 36 is a decision of the United Kingdom House of Lords which considered the permissibility of allowing witnesses to give evidence anonymously. In 2002 two men were shot and killed at a party, allegedly by the defendant, Ian Davis. He was extradited from the United States and tried at the Central Criminal Court for two counts of murder in 2004. He was convicted by the jury and appealed. The decision of the House of Lords in June 2008 led to Parliament passing the Criminal Evidence Act 2008 a month later. This legislation was later replaced by sections 86 to 97 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Protection from Harassment Act 1997</span> Law of the United Kingdom

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. On introducing the Bill's second reading in the House of Lords, the Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, said, "The aim of this Bill is to protect the victims of harassment. It will protect all such victims whatever the source of the harassment—so-called stalking behaviour, racial harassment, or anti-social behaviour by neighbours." Home Office guidance on the Act says "The legislation was always intended to tackle stalking, but the offences were drafted to tackle any form of persistent conduct which causes another person alarm or distress."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice Act 1925</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice Act 1925 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. Most of it has been repealed.

Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. The offence is created by section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Criminal Justice Act 1988</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Criminal Justice Act 1988 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom.

References

  1. ↑ Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 31.
  2. ↑ R v Pinfold [1988] QB 462.
  3. 1 2 Text of the Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 2. as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk .
  4. 1 2 R v Chalkley [1997] EWCA Crim 3416 (19 December 1997)
  5. ↑ R v Smith [1999] EWCA Crim 1525 (25 May 1999)
  6. 1 2 Criminal Appeal Act 1968, s. 7.
  7. ↑ Criminal Appeal Act 1968, s. 8.
  8. ↑ Text of the Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 3. as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk .
  9. ↑ Text of the Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 4. as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk .
  10. ↑ Text of the Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 9. as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk .
  11. ↑ Text of the Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 50. as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk .
  12. ↑ Text of the Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 11. as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk . Criminal Appeal Act 1968, s. 11.
  13. ↑ Text of the Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 15. as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk .
  14. ↑ Text of the Criminal Appeals Act 1968, s. 16-17. as in force today (including any amendments) within the United Kingdom, from legislation.gov.uk .
  15. ↑ Criminal Justice Act 1987, s. 9.
  16. ↑ Criminal Justice Act 1972, s. 36.
  17. ↑ Criminal Justice Act 1988, ss. 35-36.
  18. ↑ Criminal Appeal Act 1995, s. 13.
  19. 1 2 Hooper, Ormerod & Murphy 2008 , p. 1954
  20. ↑ Supreme Court Act 1981, s. 28.
  21. ↑ Supreme Court Act 1981, s. 29.
  22. ↑ Supreme Court Act 1981, s. 55.
  23. ↑ Taylor [1979] Crim LR 649.
  24. ↑ Criminal Appeal Act 1968, ss. 31 and 44.

Bibliography

Hooper; Ormerod; Murphy, eds. (2008). "Section F19 Inferences from Silence and the Non-production of Evidence". Blackstone's Criminal Practice . Oxford. ISBN   978-0-19-922814-0.

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.