Arthur Allan Thomas

Last updated

Arthur Allan Thomas (born 2 January 1938) [1] is a New Zealand man who was granted a Royal Pardon and compensation after being wrongfully convicted of the murders of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe in June 1970. Thomas was married and farming a property in the Pukekawa district, south of Auckland before the case. Following the revelation that the crucial evidence against him had been faked, Thomas was pardoned in 1979 and awarded NZ$950,000 in compensation for his 9 years in prison and loss of earnings. [2]

Contents

Campaign to overturn the convictions

There were numerous inconsistencies in the evidence, which led to an outcry among elements in the farming community and among relatives of Thomas and his wife, Vivien Thomas. That led to the formation of the Arthur Thomas Retrial Committee.

The report by a retired judge, Sir George MacGregor, which rejected the appeal for a retrial, was also riddled with inconsistencies and inaccuracies. However, a report on that by journalist Terry Bell, then deputy editor of the Auckland Star Saturday edition, was rejected for publication on the grounds that "it is not the role of the newspapers to attempt to try the courts". Bell then resigned and produced the booklet Bitter Hill, which is the English meaning of Pukekawa, outlining inconsistencies in the prosecution's case and the theory advanced by the retrial committee. It provided the impetus for a national campaign that eventually led to a controversial retrial where the jury was housed incommunicado with police in a local hotel. Thomas was again convicted.

Pat Booth, the assistant editor of the Auckland Star, attended the retrial and became concerned. As part of the campaign for a pardon, Booth wrote a book, Trial by Ambush. That was followed by another campaigning book, Beyond Reasonable Doubt, by British investigative author David Yallop, which was subsequently made into a film of the same name. [3]

Thomas received a pardon, and a Royal Commission report explicitly stated that detectives had used ammunition and a rifle taken from his farm to fabricate false evidence against him. A 2014 police review of the case acknowledged police misconduct was probably the explanation for the key evidence against Thomas: a spent cartridge case. [4]

Royal Commission of inquiry

Report of the Royal Commission to Inquire into the Circumstances of the Convictions of Arthur Allan Thomas for the Murders of David Harvey Crewe and Jeanette Lenore Crewe; 1980 Royal Commission report on Arthur Allan Thomas.pdf
Report of the Royal Commission to Inquire into the Circumstances of the Convictions of Arthur Allan Thomas for the Murders of David Harvey Crewe and Jeanette Lenore Crewe; 1980

A Royal Commission of Inquiry was established, headed by retired New South Wales Justice Robert Taylor. It declared Thomas to have been wrongfully charged and convicted and found that among other improprieties, police had planted a .22 rifle cartridge case in the garden of the house in which the murders were committed. The case was found four months and ten days after the area had already been subjected to one of the most intensive police searches ever undertaken. The cartridge case was said to have come from a rifle belonging to Thomas. However, the police tested only 64 rifles in an area where this weapon was common and found that two, including the one belonging to Thomas – could have fired the cartridge case found in the garden. That was the link to the deaths of the Crewes although it was later admitted that the case was "clean" and uncorroded when it was found. As such, the condition of the case was inconsistent with having lain in the garden, exposed to weather and dirt for more than four months.

No action against police officers

The commission report said: "Mr Hutton and Mr [Len] Johnston planted the shell case... and they did so to manufacture evidence that Mr Thomas' rifle had been used for the killings." [5] The Solicitor-General recommended against prosecuting the officers because of insufficient evidence. [6] An independent review of the 2014 police review by David PH Jones QC, released on 30 July 2014, concluded "In my view, there was sufficient evidence for a prosecution to have been taken against Bruce Hutton based on the available material". [7]

Subsequent events

In 2009 Arthur Allan Thomas travelled to Christchurch to support David Bain, who also had criminal convictions against him overturned. [8] In 2010 he collaborated with investigative journalist Ian Wishart on the book Arthur Allan Thomas, where for the first time he gave his perspective on his life, from before the murders to the present.

The two detectives who planted the shell that helped convict Thomas are now dead. Johnston died in 1978. Bruce Hutton, 83, died in Middlemore Hospital in April 2013. [9] At Hutton's funeral, Deputy Commissioner Mike Bush praised Mr Hutton and said he was known for having "integrity beyond reproach". [10] An editorial in the New Zealand Herald said: "that was clearly absurd. It was also an unthinking or calculated insult to Mr Thomas, who spent nine years in prison before being pardoned". [11] Thomas, then age 75, responded by saying the police were engaged in "a blatant cover up". [12] A police review of the original investigation, at a cost of $400,000 to New Zealand taxpayers, [13] released in July 2014, cleared all other suspects and implied that Arthur Thomas remained a police suspect. [14] [15] [16] The independent review by David PH Jones QC concluded that "It does not appear that there was any real inquiry by the 1970 investigation team into any persons other than Arthur Thomas". [17]

Rape and sexual assault trial

In late 2019 Thomas, then aged 81, faced one charge of rape and four of indecent assault against two women. He previously pleaded not guilty and elected trial by jury. His case was called at Manukau District Court, where he was excused from attending; Judge Charles Blackie lifted suppression orders that previously prevented the media from reporting anything about the case. [18] On 15 December 2020 at Papakura District Court, Thomas's lawyers asked that the charges be dismissed. Judge John Bergseng suppressed argument details of the hearing out of fair trial interests. [19]

The trial opened 14 June 2021 at Manukau District Court, with Aaron Perkins for the Crown and Marie Dyhrberg, QC, for the defence. [20] Judge Jon Bergseng presided. [21] Thomas was now aged 83. One complainant alleged she was raped and indecently assaulted; the other alleged she was indecently assaulted three times. [20] Both witnesses said there were others present when some of the alleged offending took place. [22] A third witness claimed Thomas had encouraged him to participate in the alleged acts. Full trial details were heavily suppressed. The Defence claimed the charges were fabricated and motivated by money. [20] Thomas's former solicitor, Chris Reid, told the court he organised a legal meeting on behalf of Thomas with the complainants and their husbands. Among those present were Reid's cousin, Thomas's then-lawyer Peter Williams, and former prime minister David Lange. Reid testified that the complainants made demands for Thomas to pay them money: "If he didn't, they were going to complain to the police about sexual abuse of one sort or another." [23] One complainant said that Thomas' 2019 petition for an apology "was the straw that broke the camel's back" and why she finally went to the police over the alleged sex offending. [24]

Reid said Williams told the complainants the meeting had to take place according to law, the threat could have constituted extortion, and recommended the complainants get independent legal advice. [23] According to Reid, Lange also advised the complainants to go to the police. [23] Three other witnesses testified for the Defence, including Thomas's second wife. Thomas himself did not testify. [25] In her closing address, Dyhrberg called the man's testimony "the stuff of fantasy"; he himself could not rely upon his own memory. She said the two women had not told the truth, and "it's gotten out of control". [26] In his closing address, Perkins said, "It is far-fetched in the extreme that two women would come along and commit perjury." [27] In summing up, Judge Bergseng told the jury that each charge must be considered separately, with a focus on the evidence specific to each one. But caution was required because the passage of time meant memories of some witnesses may have faded, making it impossible to check some of the witnesses' testimony, and also causing Thomas to lose "the ability to call witnesses who could support his defence". [28] The jury failed to reach a verdict and was discharged on 28 June 2021. [29]

On 14 October 2021 Crown Prosecutor Charlie Piho told the Manukau District Court the Crown wished to continue with the prosecution. Judge Mina Wharepouri set a trial date for November 2022. [30] However, in September 2022, a stay of prosecution was ordered in response to Thomas now being considered unfit to stand trial due to deteriorating mental health. This in effect ended the prosecution by putting it on hold indefinitely. [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Banks (New Zealand politician)</span> New Zealand politician (born 1946)

John Archibald Banks is a New Zealand former politician. He was a member of Parliament for the National Party from 1981 to 1999, and for ACT New Zealand from 2011 to 2014. He was a Cabinet Minister from 1990 to 1996 and 2011 to 2013. He left Parliament after being convicted of filing a false electoral return – a verdict which was later overturned.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bain family murders</span> 1994 multiple homicide in New Zealand

On 20 June 1994, Robin and Margaret Bain and three of their four children – Arawa, Laniet, and Stephen – were shot to death in Dunedin, New Zealand. The only suspects were David Cullen Bain, the eldest son and only survivor, and Robin Bain, the father. David Bain, aged 22, was charged with five counts of murder. In May 1995, he was convicted on each of the five counts and sentenced to mandatory life in prison with a minimum non-parole period of sixteen years.

False evidence, fabricated evidence, forged evidence, fake evidence or tainted evidence is information created or obtained illegally in order to sway the verdict in a court case. Falsified evidence could be created by either side in a case, or by someone sympathetic to either side. Misleading by suppressing evidence can also be considered a form of false evidence ; however, in some cases, suppressed evidence is excluded because it cannot be proved the accused was aware of the items found or of their location. The analysis of evidence may also be forged if the person doing the forensic work finds it easier to fabricate evidence and test results than to perform the actual work involved. Parallel construction is a form of false evidence in which the evidence is truthful but its origins are untruthfully described, at times in order to avoid evidence being excluded as inadmissible due to unlawful means of procurement such as an unlawful search.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pukekawa</span> Locality in Waikato, New Zealand

Pukekawa is a town in the Lower Waikato River area of New Zealand's North Island, 66 km south of central Auckland. The area's fertile soils are used to grow a range of vegetables, including onions, potatoes and carrots. The town was in the Franklin District until the district's abolition in 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Ellis (childcare worker)</span> New Zealander wrongfully convicted of child abuse (1958–2019)

Peter Hugh McGregor Ellis was a New Zealand childcare worker who was wrongfully convicted of child sexual abuse. He was at the centre of one of the country's most enduring judicial controversies, after being found guilty in June 1993 in the High Court on 16 counts of sexual offences involving children in his care at the Christchurch Civic Creche and sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment. He maintained his innocence until his death 26 years later and was supported by many New Zealanders in his attempts to overturn his convictions, although others believed he was guilty. Concerns about the reliability of the convictions centred on far-fetched stories told by many of the children and the interview techniques used to obtain their testimony.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder of Harvey and Jeannette Crewe</span> 1970 crimes in New Zealand

David Harvey Crewe and Jeannette Lenore Crewe were a New Zealand farming couple who were shot to death in their home on or about 17 June 1970. The murders led to the wrongful conviction and subsequent pardoning of another farmer who lived in the district, Arthur Allan Thomas. A Royal Commission set up to investigate the miscarriage of justice found that a detective had fabricated evidence and placed it at the scene of the crime. No person was ever charged with planting the evidence, and the murders remain unsolved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joe Karam</span> New Zealand rugby player and businessman

Joseph Francis Karam, also known by the nickname of "Clock", is a New Zealand former representative rugby footballer who played for the All Blacks. After retiring from rugby, he became a businessman. However, he is most notable for waging a successful 15-year campaign to have David Bain's convictions for murder overturned, and a subsequent campaign seeking compensation for him.

Christopher Harder is a lawyer based in Auckland, New Zealand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder of Urban Höglin and Heidi Paakkonen</span> Murder of two Swedish tourists

Swedish tourists Sven Urban Höglin, aged 23, and his fiancée Heidi Birgitta Paakkonen, aged 21, disappeared while tramping on the Coromandel Peninsula of New Zealand in 1989. Police, residents, and military personnel conducted the largest land-based search undertaken in New Zealand, attempting to find the couple. In December 1990, David Wayne Tamihere was convicted of murdering Höglin and Paakkonen, and sentenced to life imprisonment based largely on the testimony of three prison inmates.

Christine Marie Lundy, 38, and her 7-year-old daughter Amber Grace Lundy were murdered in Palmerston North, New Zealand, on 29 or 30 August 2000. In February 2001, after a six month investigation, Christine's husband and Amber's father, Mark Edward Lundy, was arrested and charged, and in 2002, he was convicted of the murders and sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum non-parole period of 17 years.

The murders of Gene and Eugene Thomas occurred in Wellington, New Zealand on 16 February 1994. Eugene, 68, and his son Gene, 30, were both investment and insurance brokers and owners of Invincible House at 136 The Terrace in Wellington. Their bodies were discovered inside their offices at around 6.30pm by two cleaners. John Barlow was convicted after an unprecedented third murder trial, the first two trials ending in hung juries. The need for three trials caused controversy and raised questions about aspects of the New Zealand justice system.

<i>R v Evans and McDonald</i>

R v Evans and McDonald was the prosecution of two footballers, Ched Evans and Clayton McDonald, who were accused of the rape of a woman. On 20 April 2012, Evans was convicted and sentenced to five years imprisonment. McDonald was acquitted. Several people were later fined after naming the woman on Twitter and other social media websites.

Scott Guy, a New Zealand farmer, was shot dead at the gate of the family farm in Feilding, Manawatū-Whanganui, in July 2010 at age 31. Six months later, his brother-in-law, Ewen Macdonald, was charged with murder. Macdonald was married to Guy's sister, Anna, and Guy had been best man at their wedding. Both men managed the Guys' family farm and surrounding properties on Aorangi Road, a few miles from Feilding. At the trial, it was disclosed that Guy and Macdonald had different priorities and a competitive relationship. In 2008, two years before he was killed, Guy announced at a family meeting that he expected to inherit the farm. The defence claimed that by the time of the murder, difficulties between the two had settled down and they were getting on well.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Queenstown suppressed indecency case</span> Sexual assault case by a New Zealand celebrity, 2011–2014

The Queenstown suppressed indecency case was a police investigation and court case in New Zealand from 2011 to 2014 in which a celebrity was accused of, pleaded guilty to and was convicted of "performing an indecent act intended to insult or offend" against a woman in Queenstown and later discharged without conviction and given permanent name suppression. The case fuelled discussion and controversy in New Zealand over the use by courts of suppression orders to protect the identity of perpetrators of higher social status.

Ben Smart and Olivia Hope, two young New Zealanders, disappeared in the early hours of the morning on New Year's Day, 1 January 1998. The two friends had been celebrating on New Year's Eve at Furneaux Lodge in the Marlborough Sounds with other partygoers. The pair accepted an offer from a stranger to stay aboard his yacht in the early hours of the morning, and it was the last time they were seen alive. The disappearance of the duo sparked one of the most publicised and controversial investigations in New Zealand's history.

The Larnoch Road murders is a controversial double-murder case in Auckland, New Zealand. On 21 August 1989, Deane Wade Fuller-Sandys, a 21-year-old Auckland tyre-fitter, left home to go fishing. He never returned. His body was never found and authorities initially believed he probably drowned after being swept out to sea at West Auckland's Whatipu Beach, where his car was discovered shortly afterwards. An old friend of Fuller-Sandys later told police that he may have committed suicide, as he had just broken up with his girlfriend.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Murder of Grace Millane</span> 2018 killing of a British tourist in New Zealand

Grace Emmie Rose Millane was a British tourist who was murdered in Auckland, New Zealand, in December 2018. A 26-year-old man, Jesse Shane Kempson, was charged with her murder on 8 December 2018, and her body was found in the Waitākere Ranges to the west of Auckland the following day. Kempson's name was initially suppressed by New Zealand courts, meaning it could not be published in New Zealand; however, some international media outlets chose to publish it contrary to the New Zealand court order.

Amber-Rose Rush was a 16-year-old New Zealander whose death in Dunedin in February 2018 drew extensive national media coverage. Venod Skantha, a 30-year-old Dunedin doctor, was subsequently charged with her murder. The trial of Skantha commenced on 4 November 2019 at the Dunedin High Court on a charge of murder and four counts of threatening to kill. On 26 November 2019, Skantha was found guilty of all charges. In 2020 he was sentenced to life imprisonment, with a minimum non-parole term of 19 years. On 14 April 2021, the New Zealand Court of Appeal dismissed Skantha's appeal and affirmed his conviction. The following day, Skantha was reported to have died in custody.

The New Zealand Criminal Cases Review Commission is an independent Crown entity that was set up under the Criminal Cases Review Commission Act 2019 to investigate potential miscarriages of justice. If the Commission considers a miscarriage may have occurred, it can refer the case back to the Court of Appeal to be reconsidered.

References

  1. Wishart, Ian (2010). "chapter 2". Arthur Allan Thomas: The Inside Story. New Zealand: Howling at the Moon Publishing. p. 280. ISBN   978-0-9582401-7-8.
  2. Report of the Royal Commission to Inquire into the Circumstances of the Convictions of Arthur Allan Thomas for the Murders of David Harvey Crewe and Jeanette Lenore Crewe, 1980 (PDF), p. 120, archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2011, retrieved 15 October 2010
  3. "Beyond Reasonable Doubt". nzonscreen.com. Retrieved 5 August 2014.
  4. Crewe murders: Police admit cartridge planted, http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/10327013/Crewe-murders-Police-admit-cartridge-planted Retrieved 13. 12. 17
  5. Report of the Royal Commission to Inquire into the Circumstances of the Convictions of Arthur Allan Thomas for the Murders of David Harvey Crewe and Jeanette Lenore Crewe, 1980 (PDF), p. 87, archived from the original (PDF) on 9 June 2011, retrieved 1 September 2013
  6. "Secret Thomas report released, 29 years on". Otago Daily Times. 29 May 2010. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  7. "Review By David Jones QC" (PDF). 30 July 2014.
  8. "Arthur Allan Thomas in Christchurch to support Bain". The Press. 2 March 2009. Retrieved 16 July 2009.
  9. Crewe 'plant' cop dies
  10. "'Disgust' at probe into Thomas case". 31 August 2013.
  11. "Editorial: Eulogy shows police have a long way to go". Archived from the original on 12 April 2013. Retrieved 11 April 2013.
  12. Akoorie, Natalie (11 April 2013). "Thomas: It's a blatant cover up". New Zealand Herald. Archived from the original on 31 July 2013. Retrieved 2 September 2013.
  13. "Evidence Planted". www.stuff.co.nz. 30 July 2014. Retrieved 15 August 2018.
  14. Moran, Dylan (30 July 2014). "Arthur Allan Thomas May Not Get Police Apology". 3 News.
  15. "Crewe case evidence may have been fabricated: report". ODT. 22 September 2014. Retrieved 23 March 2017.
  16. "Crewe Review". NZ Police. Retrieved 23 March 2017.
  17. "Review By David Jones QC" (PDF). 30 July 2014.
  18. Gay, Edward (19 December 2019). "Arthur Allan Thomas, pardoned for Jeanette and Harvey Crewe murders, faces rape charge". Stuff. Retrieved 16 August 2020.
  19. Gay, Edward (15 December 2020). "Arthur Allan Thomas' lawyers want rape, indecent assault charges dismissed". Stuff .
  20. 1 2 3 "Arthur Allan Thomas on trial for rape, indecent assault". 15 June 2021.
  21. "Arthur Allan Thomas trial: Man describes being 'haunted' by his role in abuse". Radio New Zealand . 18 June 2021.
  22. "Woman outlines alleged abuse by Arthur Allan Thomas". TVNZ.
  23. 1 2 3 "Arthur Allan Thomas trial: Complainants alleged to have issued extortion threat". 22 June 2021.
  24. "NZ Herald - Breaking news, latest news, business, sport and entertainment - NZ Herald". The New Zealand Herald .
  25. "Allan Thomas trial: Woman 'feared being molested'". TVNZ.
  26. "Arthur Allan Thomas' defence labels evidence of Crown witness 'stuff of fantasy'". TVNZ.
  27. "Arthur Allan Thomas: Defence in sexual abuse trial says complainants were 'fixated' on money". 23 June 2021.
  28. "Judge warns Arthur Allan Thomas jury about some witnesses' 'faded' memories". TVNZ.
  29. "Hung jury, no verdicts in Arthur Allan Thomas historical sex abuse trial". 11 June 2023.
  30. Arthur Allan Thomas to stand trial again for alleged sex offending, Edward Gay, 14 October 2021.
  31. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/300683534/arthur-allan-thomas-pardoned-for-crewe-murders-wont-face-second-trial-on-sex-charges Arthur Allan Thomas, pardoned for Crewe murders, won't face second trial on sex charges, Edward Gay, Stuff, 10 September 2022

Further reading