BP Refinery v Tracey

Last updated

BP Refinery v Tracey
Coat of Arms of Australia.svg
Court Full Court of the Federal Court
Full case nameBP Refinery (Kwinana) Pty Ltd v Tracey
Citation(s) [2020] FCAFC 89
Case history
Prior action(s)Scott Tracey v BP Refinery (Kwinana) Pty Ltd [2019] FWC 4113; Scott Tracey v BP Refinery (Kwinana) Pty Ltd [2020] FWCFB 820;
Appealed fromFull Bench of the Fair Work Commission
Appealed toFull Court of the Federal Court
Subsequent action(s)Scott Tracey v BP Refinery (Kwinana) Pty Ltd [2020] FWCFB 4206
Court membership
Judge(s) sitting Besanko, Perram, and Jagot JJ

BP Refinery v Tracey [2020] FCAFC 89 was a decision by the Full Federal Court of Australia ruling that the rejection of an application for unfair dismissal had been decided incorrectly by the Fair Work Commission (FWC). BP employee Scott Tracey had been terminated following his involvement in the production and circulation of a parodic video. A scene from the 2004 film Downfall was at the time widely used on the internet to parody various events. Tracey distributed a video using this footage to depict BP management, mocking their behaviour during negotiations on pay and conditions for employees at the Kwinana Oil Refinery.

Contents

Following his termination, Tracey applied for unfair dismissal seeking reinstatement and compensation for lost salary. His application was dismissed after the FWC held the video was sufficiently offensive to constitute a valid reason for dismissal. Tracey appealed to the Full Bench of the FWC, which overturned the initial decision. BP then sought an order from the Full Federal Court to quash the fresh decision. The Full Federal Court rejected arguments made by BP, concluding the Full Bench of the FWC correctly applied its jurisdiction and that the video was not offensive. Tracey was eventually reinstated to his position and received $200,000 in compensation.

Background

Scott Tracey was an employee at BP's Kwinana Oil Refinery. During his employment, he and other employees were engaged in collective bargaining, a process of negotiation between employees and an employer aimed at forming an agreement to regulate pay and working conditions. The discussions for this agreement saw tough tactics used by both sides. In order to push workers onto the underlying industrial award, BP sought to cancel the current agreement. The union and its members engaged took industrial action which was terminated by the FWC. [1]

In the midst of bargaining, Tracey participated in the production of a video which depicted BP management as Nazis. [2] The video showed a scene from the movie Downfall , in which Adolf Hitler acts upset and belligerent when he is notified that his regime has lost World War II. [1] This specific scene had become commonly used on the internet for parodic purposes. [3] Referred to by some as the "Downfall Hitler meme", individuals utilise the scene where Hitler breaks down and then add English subtitles different to the spoken German words to create a video intended to be humorous. [4] [5] Tracey's video was posted in a Facebook group with the title: "Hitler Parody [collective bargaining] Negotiations not going [BP's] way". [3] The video included parodic captions such as "I offered the carrot, I tried using the stick...Don't they know I'm in charge?" and "I made promises to London". [3]

BP management responded to the video by commencing an investigation, directing him not to attend work until further notice. The investigation was completed, with Tracey then invited to attend a meeting where he was required to demonstrate why he should not face disciplinary action for his conduct. [6] During the meeting, Tracey objected to the investigation process and its findings. Approximately a month later, Tracey's employment was terminated with salary paid in lieu of notice. BP's reason for termination was that Tracey had distributed highly offensive and inappropriate material in breach of its code of conduct, policies, and permitted use of information technology equipment. [1] [3]

Tracey made an application for unfair dismissal to the Fair Work Commission (FWC). [6] Unfair dismissal in Australian labour law refers to a termination of employment which an employee alleges is "harsh, unjust, or unfair". [7] In the first instance, deputy president Melanie Binet rejected his claim that he was unfairly dismissed. Binet held that it was not unreasonable to find that Tracey, in helping to make the video, had likened BP management to Hitler, Nazis or mass murderers. [8] She considered the video inappropriate and offensive, [4] and that BP had a valid reason for his subsequent dismissal. [3] [9] Binet stated that she "did not accept that by labelling something as a parody [one would get] a 'get out of jail free card' and necessarily means something is not offensive". [1] [10]

Appeal by Tracey to the Full Bench of the FWC

In lodging an appeal to the Full Bench of the FWC against the initial decision, Tracey was represented by plaintiff law firm Maurice Blackburn. His legal representative told the Australian Financial Review it "[would submit] that the dismissal is incredibly harsh when [considering] the true nature and effect of the video, which is a well-known Downfall parody video...I don't think it could be reasonably considered that the video likens any BP managers or staff to Hitler or Nazis, but ultimately this will be a decision for the full bench of the [FWC]". [8]

The primary issue in dispute was whether Tracey's actions constituted a valid reason for dismissal. [1] Tracey argued that in failing to understand the video in its broader cultural context, she had erroneously mischaracterised it as offensive and that it was a "device to make a humorous point about a matter not going to plan". [10] Vice president of the FWC Adam Hatcher stated thousands of similar parodies had been posted to the internet since the meme hit its peak in 2010, [11] and the Full Bench would apply an objective test to determine the offensiveness of the video. [10]

The Full Bench of the FWC overturned the first decision, finding the video compared the position BP reached in the negotiations with that which the Nazi regime was faced at the end of World War II, [9] observing that the meme was "culturally dissociat[ed]" from real events and that it has been used "thousands of times over a period of more than a decade for the purpose of creating, in an entirely inventive way, a satirical depiction of contemporary situations". [12] The Full Bench of the FWC concluded that it was unreasonable to find the video likened BP management to Nazis, stating "anyone with knowledge of the meme could not seriously consider that the use of the clip was to make some point involving Hitler or Nazis". [12] [13]

Appeal by BP to the Full Federal Court

BP then applied to the Full Federal Court seeking a writ of certiorari – effectively requesting it quash the decision made by the Full Bench of the FWC on the grounds its decision was contrary to law. First, BP argued the Full Bench of the FWC erred in applying its discretion in not applying a test which required Binet's decision to be "fundamentally wrong and not reasonably open on the facts, rather than just a decision that the appellate court would itself not have reached on an evaluation of the evidence". [9] Second, BP claimed that the Full Bench of the FWC had neglected to evaluate whether there was a major error of fact and that the issue of whether Tracey's behaviour breached the relevant BP Code of Conduct was one of fact. [9] The Full Federal Court dismissed BP's claims and instead upheld the decision made by the Full Bench of the FWC. [14] The Full Federal Court ordered Tracey's reinstatement, [4] and he returned to work in March 2020. [14]

Compensation

After being returned to work, compensation for the work he had missed between his termination and subsequent reinstatement was the only outstanding issue. [14] Almost two years after Tracey lodged his initial unfair dismissal application, Tracey was awarded compensation by the Full Bench of the FWC. [4] [14] BP argued Tracey should receive less than the salary he otherwise would have earned during this time due to his misconduct. BP also claimed his payment should be reduced because he ought to have found other work during the time he awaited an outcome. Tracey argued he had looked for work, which the Full Bench of the FWC accepted. It was also held his misconduct could only justify withholding any money he may have earned from potential promotion during his absence. [14] The Full Bench of the FWC ordered Tracey be paid a total of $201,394.92 in lost wages and retirement benefits. [4] [14] [15] The Australian Workers Union said Tracey's win was a "victory for workers rights...and Aussie larrikinism". [4]

Impact

The decision by the Full Federal Court to overturn Binet's decision was praised as one of few legal decisions in recent times to "put a handbrake on the increasing levels of employer control over employee conduct" and their right to free speech. [1] The Sydney Morning Herald opined the decision indirectly boosts the right of employees in the workplace to free speech, though conceded such rights are limited and the scope of free speech required exploring by future cases. [1]

The proceedings surrounding Tracey's dismissal by BP spawned another version of the Downfall meme, parodying the initial decision by Binet, mocking her interpretation of Tracey's video. [16] It eventually attracted more views than the video produced by Tracey. [17]

Related Research Articles

In employment law, constructive dismissal, also called constructive discharge or constructive termination, occurs when an employee resigns as a result of the employer creating a hostile work environment. Since the resignation was not truly voluntary, it is, in effect, a termination. For example, when an employer places extraordinary and unreasonable work demands on an employee to obtain their resignation, this can constitute a constructive dismissal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Termination of employment</span> End of an existing relationship between an employee and their employer

Termination of employment or separation of employment is an employee's departure from a job and the end of an employee's duration with an employer. Termination may be voluntary on the employee's part (resignation), or it may be at the hands of the employer, often in the form of dismissal (firing) or a layoff. Dismissal or firing is usually thought to be the employee's fault, whereas a layoff is generally done for business reasons outside the employee's performance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dismissal (employment)</span> Involuntary termination of employment

Dismissal is the termination of employment by an employer against the will of the employee. Though such a decision can be made by an employer for a variety of reasons, ranging from an economic downturn to performance-related problems on the part of the employee, being fired has a strong stigma in some cultures.

In United Kingdom law, the concept of wrongful dismissal refers exclusively to dismissal contrary to the contract of employment, which effectively means premature termination, either due to insufficient notice or lack of grounds. Although wrongful dismissal is usually associated with lack of notice sometimes it can also be caused by arbitrary dismissal where no notice was required but certain grounds were specified in the contract as being the only ones available but none existed.

<i>Downfall</i> (2004 film) 2004 film by Oliver Hirschbiegel

Downfall is a 2004 historical war drama film directed by Oliver Hirschbiegel from a screenplay by its producer, Bernd Eichinger. It is set during the Battle of Berlin in World War II, when Nazi Germany is on the verge of total defeat, and depicts the final days of Adolf Hitler. The cast includes Alexandra Maria Lara, Corinna Harfouch, Ulrich Matthes, Juliane Köhler, Heino Ferch, Christian Berkel, Alexander Held, Matthias Habich, and Thomas Kretschmann. The film is a German-Austrian-Italian co-production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Australian labour law</span> Rights and duties of workers, unions and employers in Australia

Australian labour law sets the rights of working people, the role of trade unions, and democracy at work, and the duties of employers, across the Commonwealth and in states. Under the Fair Work Act 2009, the Fair Work Commission creates a national minimum wage and oversees National Employment Standards for fair hours, holidays, parental leave and job security. The FWC also creates modern awards that apply to most sectors of work, numbering 150 in 2024, with minimum pay scales, and better rights for overtime, holidays, paid leave, and superannuation for a pension in retirement. Beyond this floor of rights, trade unions and employers often create enterprise bargaining agreements for better wages and conditions in their workplaces. In 2024, collective agreements covered 15% of employees, while 22% of employees were classified as "casual", meaning that they lose many protections other workers have. Australia's laws on the right to take collective action are among the most restrictive in the developed world, and Australia does not have a general law protecting workers' rights to vote and elect worker directors on corporation boards as do most other wealthy OECD countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adolf Hitler in popular culture</span>

Adolf Hitler, dictator of Germany from 1933 to 1945, has been represented in popular culture ever since he became a well-known politician in Germany. His distinctive image was often parodied by his opponents. Parodies became much more prominent outside Germany during his period in power. Since the end of World War II representations of Hitler, both serious and satirical, have continued to be prominent in popular culture, sometimes generating significant controversy. In many periodicals, books, and movies, Hitler and Nazism fulfill the role of archetypal evil. This treatment is not confined to fiction but is widespread amongst nonfiction writers who have discussed him in this vein. Hitler has retained a fascination from other perspectives; among many comparable examples is an exhibition at the German Historical Museum which was widely attended.

Unfair dismissal in the United Kingdom is the part of UK labour law that requires fair, just and reasonable treatment by employers in cases where a person's job could be terminated. The Employment Rights Act 1996 regulates this by saying that employees are entitled to a fair reason before being dismissed, based on their capability to do the job, their conduct, whether their position is economically redundant, on grounds of a statute, or some other substantial reason. It is automatically unfair for an employer to dismiss an employee, regardless of length of service, for becoming pregnant, or for having previously asserted certain specified employment rights. Otherwise, an employee must have worked for two years. This means an employer only terminates an employee's job lawfully if the employer follows a fair procedure, acts reasonably and has a fair reason.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WorkChoices</span> Australian industrial relations law

WorkChoices was the name given to changes made to the federal industrial relations laws in Australia by the Howard government in 2005, being amendments to the Workplace Relations Act 1996 by the Workplace Relations Amendment Act 2005, sometimes referred to as the Workplace Relations Amendment Act 2005, that came into effect on 27 March 2006.

A severance package is pay and benefits that employees may be entitled to receive when they leave employment at a company unwillfully. In addition to their remaining regular pay, it may include some of the following:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Employment Rights Act 1996</span> United Kingdom Law

The Employment Rights Act 1996 is a United Kingdom Act of Parliament passed by the Conservative government to codify existing law on individual rights in UK labour law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Employment Relations Act 2000</span> Statute of the Parliament of New Zealand

The New Zealand Employment Relations Act 2000 is a statute of the Parliament of New Zealand. It was substantially amended by the Employment Relations Amendment Act 2001 and by the ERAA 2004.

Peter Connelly was a 17-month-old British boy who was killed in London in 2007 after suffering more than fifty injuries over an eight-month period, during which he was repeatedly seen by the London Borough of Haringey Children's services and National Health Service (NHS) health professionals. Baby P's real first name was revealed as "Peter" on the conclusion of a subsequent trial of Peter's mother's boyfriend on a charge of raping a two-year-old. His full identity was revealed when his killers were named after the expiry of a court anonymity order on 10 August 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fair Work Commission</span> Australian industrial relations tribunal

The Fair Work Commission (FWC), until 2013 known as Fair Work Australia (FWA), is the Australian industrial relations tribunal created by the Fair Work Act 2009 as part of the Rudd Government's reforms to industrial relations in Australia. Operations commenced on 1 July 2009. It is the successor of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission, and also performs functions previously performed by the Workplace Authority and the Australian Fair Pay Commission.

In labour law, unfair dismissal is an act of employment termination made without good reason or contrary to the country's specific legislation.

Eastwood v Magnox Electric plc [2004] UKHL 35 is a UK labour law case concerning damages for wrongful dismissal, which were held to not be limited if a breach of contract occurs during the performance of the contract, rather than at the point of termination.

South African labour law regulates the relationship between employers, employees and trade unions in the Republic of South Africa.

In law, wrongful dismissal, also called wrongful termination or wrongful discharge, is a situation in which an employee's contract of employment has been terminated by the employer, where the termination breaches one or more terms of the contract of employment, or a statute provision or rule in employment law. Laws governing wrongful dismissal vary according to the terms of the employment contract, as well as under the laws and public policies of the jurisdiction.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">El Risitas</span> Spanish comedian and actor (1956–2021)

Juan Joya Borja, better known by his stage name El Risitas, was a Spanish comedian and actor. He gained widespread popularity in 2015 thanks to a series of memes based on a television interview recorded in 2007 on Jesús Quintero's TV show Ratones Coloraos.

Legislation relating to employment in the Republic of Ireland governs the provision and content of the contract of employment, payment of wages, length of the working day and working week, and dismissal procedures.

References

Bibliography

Source videos
Academic literature
News articles