Battle of Dibrivka

Last updated

Battle of Dibrivka
Part of the Ukrainian War of Independence
Makhno group.jpg
Nestor Makhno (center) and Fedir Shchus (right), the insurgent commanders at the Battle of Dibrivka
Date30 September 1918
Location 47°58′19″N36°28′20″E / 47.97194°N 36.47222°E / 47.97194; 36.47222
Result

Insurgent victory

Belligerents

Central Powers

Black flag.svg Anarchists
Commanders and leaders
UnknownBlack flag.svg Nestor Makhno
Black flag.svg Fedir Shchus
Units involved
Austrian Imperial Standard - Infantry pattern mix early 19th century.svg  Austro-Hungarian Army
Ensign of the National Guard of Ukraine.svg Ukrainian State Guard  [ uk ]
Black flag.svg Insurgents
Strength
500 Austrians [1]
200 Haydamaks [2]
30 insurgents [1]
Casualties and losses
620 killed
80 captured
Unknown

The Battle of Dibrivka was a military conflict between Ukrainian insurgents, led by Nestor Makhno and Fedir Shchus, and the Central Powers that were occupying southern Ukraine. It took place on 30 September 1918, towards the end of World War I. The battle began when Makhno, Shchus, and a group of anarchist supporters ambushed Austrian and Ukrainian detachments stationed in Dibrivka. The anarchists were armed with machine guns and were assisted by local peasants, who together captured ammunition, arms, and prisoners of war. It resulted in an insurgent victory and the establishment of an autonomous territory in the region, following the subsequent defeat of the Central Powers.

Contents

Background

Following the October Revolution, a civil war broke out in Ukraine between supporters of the Central Council and the Soviets. [3] During the conflict, Ukrainian anarchists had sided with the Soviets. [4] But following the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, the Central Powers were invited to invade Ukraine. [5] The anarchists were forced to retreat to Russia, where they regrouped in Taganrog and planned to launch a war of independence against the occupying powers. [6]

In July 1918, the anarchists returned to Ukraine, finding a situation of unrest among the peasantry, who were beginning to resist the newly established Ukrainian State, a client state of the German Empire. [7] The insurgent leader Nestor Makhno clandestinely returned to his hometown of Huliaipole, where he held secret meetings with other anarchists, with whom he made plans to ignite an insurrection against the occupation forces. [8] On 26 September, Makhno's insurgent group ambushed the Austrian detachment in Huliaipole and seized their weapons and horses. The anarchists then withdrew north to Pokrovske, where they launched another surprise attack against the Austrians and briefly captured the town from the occupying powers. [9]

Battle and planning

After receiving a number of new recruits into their ranks, Nestor Makhno's detachment withdrew north to the village of Dibrivka. [10] Following an attack by Austrian reinforcements from Polohy, Makhno's detachment retreated into the nearby forest [11] where they joined forces with another small insurgent detachment led by Fedir Shchus. [12] Shchus's detachment had been sheltering in the forest since July, after a defeat at the hands of the Austrians. [13]

While the insurgents discussed the recent advance of Anton Denikin's Volunteer Army in South Russia, on 30 September, the Austrians set up roadblocks around the village, isolating the insurgents in the forest. [14] The combined insurgent forces found themselves surrounded with Austrians stationed along the Vovcha river in the south-east; a German detachment stationed on the high ground with an artillery piece; another Austrian infantry brigade stationed in the north; 200 cavalry of the Ukrainian State Guard stationed in the west; and reinforcements on the way. [13] Makhno devised a plan to break the encirclement—a surprise attack against the troops in the village itself—and managed to convince Shchus to join. [15]

Makhno and Shchus selected 30 men to carry out the attack, which was to take place during the day, while the Austrians were resting. [16] Shchus led his smaller detachment to flank from the other side of the village and prepare a Maxim gun for flanking fire. Makhno's larger detachment covertly approached the town square with a Lewis gun, undetected by the Austrians. Most of the Austrian detachment was wiped out in the crossfire. Others turned and fled in a panic. [17] Retreating towards Pokrovske, the Austrians were pursued and captured by the local peasantry, who were themselves armed only with pitchforks. Makhno himself prevented the peasantry from lynching the Austrians. [18]

In the course of the battle, the insurgents managed to capture four machine guns, two truckloads of ammunition and 80 prisoners of war. The captured members of the Ukrainian State Guard and local collaborationist landowners were executed, while the captured Austrians were fed and released on condition of their demilitarisation, stripping them of their kepis before sending them on their way. [19] For his role in their victory, the insurgents bestowed Makhno with the title Batko (Father), which remained his moniker throughout the remainder of the war. [20]

Aftermath

Following the victory at Dibrivka, the insurgents went on to briefly occupy Huliaipole, which became a center of peasant resistance against the Central Powers. They were swiftly joined by Vasyl Kurylenko in Berdiansk and Petro Petrenko in Hryshyne, which greatly expanded the insurgents' sphere of influence to cover most of Katerynoslav and Northern Tavria. [21] The German commander-in-chief responded by ordering the liquidation of the Ukrainian insurgents. [22] The Austrians and Haydamaks subsequently returned to Dibrivka and bombarded the village with artillery, forcing the insurgents to retreat as the occupation forces set fire to the village, [23] destroying over 600 houses. [24] This prompted fierce reprisals from the insurgents, [25] who in turn set fire to the houses of the wealthy in Harylivka  [ uk ] and Ivanivka  [ uk ], [21] and carried out attacks against the region's Mennonites that had collaborated with the occupation forces. [26]

Supported by seizures from the local landowners and with increasing disaffection among the ranks of the occupying forces, the insurrection spread throughout southern and eastern Ukraine, with Tsarekostyantynivka and Dibrivka both briefly falling under anarchist occupation. [27] The insurgents were then pushed south to Temyrivka  [ uk ], where they were defeated in a surprise attack by a Hungarian detachment, killing half the insurgents and wounding their commanders. [28] But following reinforcements by another insurgent detachment led by Simeon Pravda, on 27 November, [29] the anarchists decisively reoccupied Huliaipole, where they established a general staff for an organised Revolutionary Insurgent Army. [30] The Central Powers were subsequently driven out of southern Ukraine and, following their surrender to the Allies, the Ukrainian State was overthrown by the Directorate, which reestablished the Ukrainian People's Republic. [31]

On 23 January 1919, Dibrivka played host to the First Regional Congress of Peasants, Workers and Insurgents, which discussed how to strengthen the frontlines against the forces of the Ukrainian nationalists and the White movement. [32] Soon after, the Makhnovshchina made a pact with the newly established Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the insurgents were integrated into the Red Army. [33]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Arshinov</span> Russian anarcho-communist (1886–1937)

Peter Andreyevich Arshinov, was a Russian anarchist revolutionary and intellectual who chronicled the history of the Makhnovshchina.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nestor Makhno</span> Ukrainian anarchist revolutionary (1888–1934)

Nestor Ivanovych Makhno, also known as Bat'ko Makhno, was a Ukrainian anarchist revolutionary and the commander of the Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine during the Ukrainian Civil War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Volin</span> Russian anarchist (1882–1945)

Vsevolod Mikhailovich Eikhenbaum, commonly known by his pseudonym Volin, was a Russian anarchist intellectual. He became involved in revolutionary socialist politics during the 1905 Russian Revolution, for which he was forced into exile, where he gravitated towards anarcho-syndicalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maria Nikiforova</span> Ukrainian anarchist (1885–1919)

Maria Hryhorivna Nikiforova was a Ukrainian anarchist partisan leader that led the Black Guards during the Ukrainian War of Independence, becoming widely renowned as an atamansha. A self-described terrorist from the age of 16, she was imprisoned for her activities in Russia before managing to escape to western Europe. With the outbreak of World War I, she took up the defencist line and joined the French Foreign Legion on the Macedonian front before returning to Ukraine with the outbreak of the 1917 Revolution.

The Makhnovshchina was a mass movement to establish anarchist communism in southern and eastern Ukraine during the Ukrainian War of Independence of 1917–1921. Named after Nestor Makhno, the commander-in-chief of the Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine, its aim was to create a system of free soviets that would manage the transition towards a stateless and classless society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fedir Shchus</span> Ukrainian anarchist and military commander (1893–1921)

Fedir Shchus, also Fyodor Shuss or Feodosiy Shchus, was a commander (ataman) in the Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine of Nestor Makhno.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Semen Karetnyk</span> Ukrainian revolutionary (1893–1920)

Semen Mykytovych Karetnyk was a Ukrainian anarchist and a commander of the Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine (RIAU). He often replaced Nestor Makhno as supreme commander of the Black Army in 1920. Karetnyk gained a reputation for his central role in defeating the White Army in Crimea in November 1920.

The Nabat Confederation of Anarchist Organizations, better known simply as the Nabat, was a Ukrainian anarchist organization that came to prominence during the Ukrainian War of Independence. The organization, based in Kharkiv, had branches in all of Ukraine's major cities. Its constitution was designed to be appealing to each of the different anarchist schools of thought.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine</span> Anarchist army of Ukrainian and Crimean peasants and workers (1918–21)

The Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine, also known as the Black Army or as Makhnovtsi, named after their leader Nestor Makhno, was an anarchist army formed largely of Ukrainian peasants and workers during the Russian Civil War of 1917–1922. They protected the operation of "free soviets" and libertarian communes by the Makhnovshchina, an attempt to form a stateless anarcho-communist society from 1918 to 1921 during the Ukrainian War of Independence.

The Battle of Peregonovka was a September 1919 military conflict in which the Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine defeated the Volunteer Army. After retreating west across Ukraine for four months and 600 kilometers, the Insurgent Army turned east and surprised the Volunteer Army. The Insurgent Army reclaimed its capital of Huliaipole within ten days.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Halyna Kuzmenko</span> Ukrainian anarchist (1897–1978)

Agafya "Halyna" Andriivna Kuzmenko was a Ukrainian teacher and anarchist revolutionary. After moving to southern Ukraine, she became a prominent figure within the ranks of the Makhnovshchina, a mass movement to establish a libertarian communist society. Kuzmenko spearheaded the movement's educational activities, promoted Ukrainization and acted as an outspoken advocate of women's rights. Along with her husband, the anarchist military leader Nestor Makhno, in 1921 she fled into exile from the political repression in Ukraine. While imprisoned for subversive activities in Poland, she gave birth to her daughter Elena Mikhnenko, whom she brought with her to Paris. Following the death of her husband, the outbreak of World War II saw her deportation for forced labour, first by the Nazis and then by the Soviets. After her release, she spent her final days with her daughter in Kazakhstan.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Union of Poor Peasants</span> 20th-century Ukrainian anarchist organization

The Union of Poor Peasants, also known as the Peasant Group of Anarcho-Communists or the Huliaipole Anarchist Group, was an underground anarchist organization, operating in the years 1905–1908 in the Huliaipole Raion in Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military Revolutionary Council</span> De facto executive of the Makhnovshchina (1919–1920)

The Military Revolutionary Council was the de facto executive of the Makhnovshchina, empowered to act during the interim between sittings of the Regional Congresses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Regional Congress of Peasants, Workers and Insurgents</span>

The Regional Congresses of Peasants, Workers and Insurgents represented the "highest form of democratic authority" within the political system of the Makhnovshchina. They brought together delegates from the region's peasantry, industrial workers and insurgent soldiers, which would discuss the issues at hand and take their decisions back with them to local popular assemblies.

Oleksandr Kostyantynovich Semenyuta was a Ukrainian insurrectionary anarchist and leader of the Union of Poor Peasants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oleksiy Marchenko</span> Ukrainian anarchist military leader

Oleksiy Ivanovych Marchenko was a Ukrainian anarchist military leader, who fought in the war of independence as a cavalry commander in the Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine.

The Polonsky conspiracy, also known as the Polonsky plot or Polonsky affair, was an attempt by Ukrainian Bolsheviks to overthrow the Makhnovshchina during the autumn of 1919.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foma Kozhyn</span> Ukrainian revolutionary (died 1921)

Foma Kozhyn was a Ukrainian revolutionary and the commander of the machine-gun regiment of the Revolutionary Insurgent Army of Ukraine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Starobilsk agreement</span> 1920 Russian Civil War treaty

The Starobilsk agreement was a 1920 political and military alliance between the Makhnovshchina, an anarchist mass movement led by Nestor Makhno's Insurgent Army, and the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, which the Bolsheviks had established as the legitimate government of Ukraine.

The Bolshevik–Makhnovist conflict was a period of political and military conflict between the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic and the Makhnovshchina, for control over southern Ukraine. The Bolsheviks aimed to eliminate the Makhnovshchina and neutralise its peasant base. In turn, the Makhnovists fought against the implementation of the Red Terror and the policy of war communism.

References

  1. 1 2 Darch 2020, p. 32; Skirda 2004, pp. 61–62.
  2. Darch 2020, p. 32.
  3. Darch 2020, pp. 15–16; Malet 1982, pp. 6–7; Skirda 2004, p. 40.
  4. Malet 1982, pp. 6–7; Skirda 2004, p. 40.
  5. Avrich 1971, pp. 182–183; Darch 2020, pp. 20–21; Malet 1982, p. 8; Skirda 2004, p. 44.
  6. Malet 1982, pp. 8–9; Skirda 2004, pp. 45–46.
  7. Footman 1961, pp. 256–260; Malet 1982, pp. 13–14; Shubin 2010, p. 163; Skirda 2004, pp. 53–60.
  8. Avrich 1988, p. 113; Footman 1961, p. 258; Malet 1982, p. 14; Shubin 2010, p. 163; Skirda 2004, p. 55.
  9. Malet 1982, pp. 14–15.
  10. Darch 2020, p. 32; Malet 1982, pp. 15–16; Palij 1976, p. 100.
  11. Malet 1982, pp. 15–16.
  12. Darch 2020, p. 32; Footman 1961, p. 260; Malet 1982, p. 16; Palij 1976, pp. 100–101; Patterson 2020, p. 56; Peters 1970, p. 41; Shubin 2010, p. 163; Skirda 2004, pp. 60–61.
  13. 1 2 Malet 1982, p. 16.
  14. Darch 2020, p. 32; Footman 1961, pp. 260–261; Skirda 2004, p. 61.
  15. Malet 1982, p. 16; Palij 1976, pp. 101–102; Patterson 2020, p. 56; Skirda 2004, p. 61.
  16. Malet 1982, pp. 16–17; Palij 1976, p. 102; Skirda 2004, pp. 61–62.
  17. Darch 2020, p. 32; Footman 1961, p. 261; Malet 1982, pp. 16–17; Palij 1976, p. 102; Peters 1970, pp. 41–42; Skirda 2004, pp. 61–62.
  18. Footman 1961, p. 261; Malet 1982, pp. 16–17; Skirda 2004, p. 62.
  19. Skirda 2004, p. 62.
  20. Darch 2020, p. 32; Malet 1982, pp. 16–17; Palij 1976, p. 102; Patterson 2020, p. 56; Peters 1970, p. 42; Shubin 2010, p. 163; Skirda 2004, p. 62.
  21. 1 2 Malet 1982, p. 17.
  22. Darch 2020, pp. 32–33.
  23. Darch 2020, pp. 32–33; Malet 1982, p. 17; Palij 1976, pp. 102–103; Patterson 2020, pp. 56–57; Peters 1970, p. 42.
  24. Malet 1982, p. 17; Palij 1976, pp. 102–103; Patterson 2020, pp. 56–57; Skirda 2004, p. 63.
  25. Malet 1982, p. 17; Palij 1976, p. 103; Patterson 2020, p. 57; Shubin 2010, pp. 163–164; Skirda 2004, pp. 63–64.
  26. Darch 2020, pp. 32–33; Palij 1976, p. 103; Patterson 2020, p. 57; Shubin 2010, pp. 163–164; Skirda 2004, pp. 63–64.
  27. Malet 1982, p. 18.
  28. Malet 1982, pp. 18–19; Skirda 2004, pp. 64–65.
  29. Malet 1982, pp. 18–19.
  30. Darch 2020, p. 33; Malet 1982, pp. 18–19; Palij 1976, p. 103; Skirda 2004, pp. 78–79.
  31. Darch 2020, pp. 33–34; Malet 1982, pp. 19–20; Peters 1970, p. 42; Shubin 2010, pp. 164–165; Skirda 2004, p. 67.
  32. Darch 2020, pp. 39–41; Malet 1982, pp. 25–26; Skirda 2004, pp. 80–81.
  33. Darch 2020, p. 41; Malet 1982, pp. 26–27; Shubin 2010, p. 170; Skirda 2004, pp. 81–82.

Bibliography