Corporate social entrepreneurship

Last updated

A corporate social entrepreneur (CSE) is someone who attempts to advance a social agenda in addition to a formal job role as part of a corporation. It is possible for CSEs to work in organizational contexts that are favourable to corporate social responsibility (CSR). CSEs focus on developing both social capital and economic capital, and their formal job role may not always align with corporate social responsibility. A person in a non-executive or managerial position can still be considered a CSE. [1] [2]

Contents

Relevance

CSE is a multi-disciplinary scientific sub-field relating to the fields of corporate social responsibility and sustainability. It has relevance in the context of business and management, specifically in areas such as business ethics, sustainability, organizational behavior, entrepreneurship, human resource management and business strategy. The concept has intersections with sociology, anthropology, social psychology and philosophy. [3]

The social entrepreneurship literature has largely concentrated on the voluntary, not-for-profit, or "third" sector. In the for-profit context, the social entrepreneur is traditionally perceived as a philanthropic agent or business owner. [2] [4] In the UK, the corporation is defined by the company’s directors and shareholders in its articles of association, requiring employees to deliver returns to shareholders, through their job roles. [5] The exception to this might be the UK’s Co-operative Group, which describes its business as guided by a social mission and is not responsible to shareholders for delivering profit.

CSE is unlikely to have the time or other resources to commit full-scale due to organizational constraints. Hence, corporate social entrepreneurship is characterized by its informality. [6] The entrepreneurial discretion that is required to perform it is controversial. [7] Activity done by CSEs varied across the domains of CSR. [8]

Background

CSE was initially described in 2002 in a theoretical working paper published in the Hull University Business School Research Memoranda Series. [9] The paper argued that personal values could also motivate CSR (and sustainability), along with more apparent economic and macro-political drivers. This reflected traditional business ethics and the philosophical debate on moral agency. [10] [11] The paper was then followed by a UK conference paper, published the following year in the Journal of Business Ethics, [12] which discussed the significance of managerial discretion in CSR.

The term "corporate social entrepreneur" was first used in a paper presented during the 17th Annual European Business Ethics Network Conference held in June 2004. [13] The term "corporate social entrepreneur" was defined and distinguished from other types of entrepreneurs, such as executive entrepreneurs, intrapreneurs (Pinchot, 1985), policy entrepreneurs, and public or social entrepreneur. [14] [13] The term initially referred to managers. However, employee inclusion was later extended to all levels of the firm. [1]

Dr. Christine A. Hemingway developed the idea of CSE after her stint as a marketing executive in the corporate sector. [3] The notion was also inspired by Wood, who had previously referred to "Ethical training, cultural background, preferences…and life experiences…that motivate human behavior". [15] [16]

Business ethics

Embezzlement of social entrepreneurial funds is not unheard of, nor are generally unethical business practices being covered up by robust social entrepreneurial programs. [17] [18] Many businesses conduct social entrepreneurship for the sake of public relations. [19] Social corporate entrepreneurship activity has yet to be quantified on any objective scale. [20] There is some evidence that supports the idea that businesses that are ethical, as reported by their employees, are performing better than those that are not. [21] This evidence is joined by other evidence which suggests that employees tend to leave companies that they do not view as behaving ethically. [22] CSE has been described as a manifestation of enlightened self-interest. [14] [23] [24] Alternatively, a deontological viewpoint frames acts of socially responsible behavior as driven by the individual's sense of duty to society, which may be viewed in terms of altruism. [12] [25]

Research

Summers and Dyck (2011) described the abstract stages of CSE as: first socialization, or the conception of a socially beneficial idea. Second externalization, developing the idea into a concrete plan. Third integration, making the idea a reality. Finally, fourth is internalization, or establishing socially beneficial practices in the company. [26]

Some studies have shown a positive relationship between CSR and financial performance, [27] others regard the picture as more nuanced. [28] Consequently, the notion of the corporate social entrepreneur is controversial due to arguments about the role of business and whether or not CSR helps financial performance, and because the concept of employee discretion has been considered a key factor in moral character (in the ancient philosophical sense). [29] Some unethical behavior is sometimes acknowledged as an outcome of discretion and agency; corporate irresponsibility is regarded as insufficient. [7] This is of particular relevance in the global financial crisis of 2008, caused by financial irregularities and lapses in corporate governance. These have produced some calls to move beyond capitalism. [30] Individuals closely related between the financial objectives of a company and public well-being sometimes referred to as Social Intraprenuers. [31] [32] Hemingway (2013) referred to the synonymous nature of the two terms: intrapreneur (Pinchot, 1985) and corporate entrepreneur. [33]

The value system that is employed within an organization plays a large role in the emergence of corporate social entrepreneurs. [34] Moreover, the sustainability of social intrapreneurship ventures has been called into question by critics. Socially beneficial ventures often struggles in the short term, leading to hesitance from investors. [35]

See also

Related Research Articles

Business ethics is a form of applied ethics or professional ethics, that examines ethical principles and moral or ethical problems that can arise in a business environment. It applies to all aspects of business conduct and is relevant to the conduct of individuals and entire organizations. These ethics originate from individuals, organizational statements or the legal system. These norms, values, ethical, and unethical practices are the principles that guide a business.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporate social responsibility</span> Form of corporate self-regulation aimed at contributing to social or charitable goals

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) or corporate social impact is a form of international private business self-regulation which aims to contribute to societal goals of a philanthropic, activist, or charitable nature by engaging in, with, or supporting professional service volunteering through pro bono programs, community development, administering monetary grants to non-profit organizations for the public benefit, or to conduct ethically oriented business and investment practices. While once it was possible to describe CSR as an internal organizational policy or a corporate ethic strategy similar to what is now known today as Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG); that time has passed as various companies have pledged to go beyond that or have been mandated or incentivized by governments to have a better impact on the surrounding community. In addition national and international standards, laws, and business models have been developed to facilitate and incentivize this phenomenon. Various organizations have used their authority to push it beyond individual or even industry-wide initiatives. In contrast, it has been considered a form of corporate self-regulation for some time, over the last decade or so it has moved considerably from voluntary decisions at the level of individual organizations to mandatory schemes at regional, national, and international levels. Moreover, scholars and firms are using the term "creating shared value", an extension of corporate social responsibility, to explain ways of doing business in a socially responsible way while making profits.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Business Council for Sustainable Development</span>

The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) is a CEO-led organization of over 225 international companies. The council is also connected to 60 national and regional business councils and partner organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social responsibility</span> Ethical framework

Social responsibility is an ethical framework in which a person works and cooperates with other people and organizations for the benefit of the community.

Double bottom line seeks to extend the conventional bottom line, which measures fiscal performance—financial profit or loss—by adding a second bottom line to measure a for-profit business's performance in terms of positive social impact. There is controversy about how to measure the double bottom line, especially since the use of the term "bottom line" implies some form of quantification. A 2004 report by the Center for Responsible Business noted that while there are "generally accepted principles of accounting" for financial returns, "A comparable standard for social impact accounting does not yet exist." Social return on investment has been suggested as a way to quantify the second bottom line, though defining and measuring social impact can prove elusive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stakeholder theory</span> Management and ethical theory that considers multiple constituencies

The stakeholder theory is a theory of organizational management and business ethics that accounts for multiple constituencies impacted by business entities like employees, suppliers, local communities, creditors, and others. It addresses morals and values in managing an organization, such as those related to corporate social responsibility, market economy, and social contract theory.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Social entrepreneurship</span> Approach to develop, fund and implement solutions to social or environmental issues

Social entrepreneurship is an approach by individuals, groups, start-up companies or entrepreneurs, in which they develop, fund and implement solutions to social, cultural, or environmental issues. This concept may be applied to a wide range of organizations, which vary in size, aims, and beliefs. For-profit entrepreneurs typically measure performance using business metrics like profit, revenues and increases in stock prices. Social entrepreneurs, however, are either non-profits, or they blend for-profit goals with generating a positive "return to society". Therefore, they use different metrics. Social entrepreneurship typically attempts to further broad social, cultural and environmental goals often associated with the voluntary sector in areas such as poverty alleviation, health care and community development.

Sustainability reporting refers to the disclosure, whether voluntary, solicited, or required, of non-financial performance information to outsiders of the organization. Generally speaking, sustainability reporting deals with information concerning environmental, social, economic and governance issues in the broadest sense. These are the criteria gathered under the acronym ESG.

Intrapreneurship is the act of behaving like an entrepreneur while working within a large organization. Intrapreneurship is known as the practice of a corporate management style that integrates risk-taking and innovation approaches, as well as the reward and motivational techniques, that are more traditionally thought of as being the province of entrepreneurship. Corporate entrepreneurship is a more general term referring to entrepreneurial actions taking place within an existing organization whereas Intrapreneurship refers to individual activities and behaviors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hybrid organization</span>

A hybrid organization is an organization that mixes elements, value systems and action logics of various sectors of society, i.e. the public sector, the private sector and the voluntary sector. A more general notion of hybridity can be found in Hybrid institutions and governance.

The chief sustainability officer, sometimes known by other titles, is the corporate title of an executive position within a corporation that is in charge of the corporation's "environmental" programs. Several companies have created such environmental manager positions in the 21st century to formalize their commitment to the environment. The rise of the investor ESG movement and stakeholder capitalism, has increased the need for corporations to address sustainability and social issues across their value chain, and address growing needs of external stakeholders. Normally these responsibilities rest with the facility manager, who has provided cost effective resource and environmental control as part of the basic services necessary for the company to function. However, as sustainability initiatives have expanded beyond the facility — so has the importance of the position to what is now a C-level executive role. The position of CSO has not been standardized across industries and individual companies which leads it to take on differing roles depending on the organization. The position has also been challenged as symbolic, in that it does not actually have the effect of increasing sustainable practices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corporate sustainability</span> Business strategy that focuses on sustainability as a core aspect of the business

Corporate sustainability is an approach aiming to create long-term stakeholder value through the implementation of a business strategy that focuses on the ethical, social, environmental, cultural, and economic dimensions of doing business. The strategies created are intended to foster longevity, transparency, and proper employee development within business organizations. Firms will often express their commitment to corporate sustainability through a statement of Corporate Sustainability Standards (CSS), which are usually policies and measures that aim to meet, or exceed, minimum regulatory requirements.

Entrepreneurship is the creation or extraction of economic value in ways that generally entail beyond the minimal amount of risk, and potentially involving values besides simply economic ones.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">CBS International Business School</span> Business school in Germany

The CBS International Business School (CBS) is a state-recognised, private business school which emerged in 2020 from the individual brands Cologne Business School (CBS) and European Management School (EMS). At its locations in Cologne, Mainz, Potsdam, Aachen, Brühl, Neuss and Solingen, it offers approximately 3,000 students its predominantly English-language business management study courses with the academic degrees Bachelor of Arts, Bachelor of Science, Master of Arts, Master of Science and MBA. The CBS Cologne Business School GmbH is the responsible body of the university.

ALTIS – Graduate School Business & Society is a School for graduate students of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore in Milan, Italy. The school offers MBA programs, specializing masters and many executive education programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wayne Visser</span>

Wayne Visser is a writer, speaker, film producer, academic, editor of poetry, social entrepreneur and futurist focused on sustainable development, corporate social responsibility and creating integrated value.

Ndidi Nnoli-Edozien is a Nigerian social entrepreneur and corporate sustainability and responsibility (CSR) expert and Bottom of the Pyramid empowerment advocate. She is the Founder and President of the Growing Businesses Foundation, Nigeria's largest Bottom of the Pyramid platform which has been managing CSR Projects for multinational corporations. Her status as a social entrepreneur has been recognized by the Bertelsmann AG to whom she is affiliated as a Reinhard Mohn Fellow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Islamic Reporting Initiative</span>

The Islamic Reporting Initiative (IRI) is an independent nonprofit organization leading the creation of the IRI Standard: a reporting standard for Environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) based on Islamic principles and values. Its objective is to enable organizations to inclusively assess, report, verify and certify their ESG and philanthropic programs in support of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Social entrepreneurship in South Asia involves business activities that have a social benefit, often for people at the bottom of the pyramid. It is an emerging area of entrepreneurship that is supported by both the public sector and the private sector.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lára Jóhannsdóttir</span> Icelandic academic

Lára Jóhannsdóttir is a professor in the Faculty of Business Administration at the University of Iceland. She is also a member of the faculty in the Environment and Natural Resources (ENR) Graduate Programme, an interdisciplinary program with ties to all five Schools of the University, but administratively part of the School of Engineering and Natural Sciences. Lára was the academic director of the ENR Programme in 2019, and is the first female professor in the faculty of Business Administration.

References

  1. 1 2 Hemingway 2013b.
  2. 1 2 Austin, James; Stevenson, Howard; Wei-Skillern, Jane (2012). "Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both?". Revista de Administração. 47 (3): 370–384. doi: 10.5700/rausp1055 .
  3. 1 2 Hemingway 2013a.
  4. Thompson, John L. (2002). "The world of the social entrepreneur". International Journal of Public Sector Management. 15 (5): 412–431. doi:10.1108/09513550210435746.
  5. "Model articles of association for limited companies". GOV.UK. 10 October 2017.
  6. Hemingway, Christine A. (2013). Corporate Social Entrepreneurship: Integrity Within. Cambridge University Press. pp. 119–192. ISBN   978-1-107-44719-6.
  7. 1 2 Hemingway 2005.
  8. Hemingway 2013a, Chapters 8, 9.
  9. Hemingway, C.A., An Exploratory Analysis of Corporate Social Responsibility: Definitions, Motives and Values, Research Memorandum No. 34, University of Hull Business School. 2002. ISBN   1-902034-24-4
  10. Lovell, Alan (2002). "Moral agency as victim of the vulnerability of autonomy". Business Ethics: A European Review. 11: 62–76. doi:10.1111/1467-8608.00259.
  11. Maclagan 1998.
  12. 1 2 Hemingway, Christine A.; Maclagan, Patrick W. (2004). "Managers' Personal Values as Drivers of Corporate Social Responsibility". Journal of Business Ethics. 50 (1): 33–44. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000020964.80208.c9. JSTOR   25123191. S2CID   154889970.
  13. 1 2 Hemingway, C.A., Personal Values as the Catalyst for the Corporate Social Entrepreneur. 17th Annual European Business Ethics Network (EBEN) Conference ('Ethics and Entrepreneurship', University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands, 24/26 June 2004
  14. 1 2 Austin, James; Stevenson, Howard; Wei-Skillern, Jane (2006). "Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?". Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 30: 1–22. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x. S2CID   154727792.
  15. Wood, Donna J. (1991). "Corporate Social Performance Revisited". The Academy of Management Review. 16 (4): 691–718. doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279616. hdl:10068/100015. JSTOR   258977.
  16. Trevino, Linda Klebe (1986). "Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model". Academy of Management Review. 11 (3): 601–617. doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4306235.
  17. Jones Christensen, Lisa; Mackey, Alison; Whetten, David (1 May 2014). "Taking Responsibility for Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Leaders in Creating, Implementing, Sustaining, or Avoiding Socially Responsible Firm Behaviors". Academy of Management Perspectives. 28 (2): 164–178. doi:10.5465/amp.2012.0047.
  18. Dejardin, Marcus; Laurent, Hélène (April 2016). The Ambivalent Effect of Corruption on Entrepreneurship and Economic Development. International OFEL Conference on Governance, Management and Entrepreneurship. Zagreb. pp. 903–924. ProQuest   1803688400.
  19. Chell, Elizabeth; Spence, Laura J.; Perrini, Francesco; Harris, Jared D. (1 February 2016). "Social Entrepreneurship and Business Ethics: Does Social Equal Ethical?". Journal of Business Ethics. 133 (4): 619–625. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2439-6 .
  20. Kuratko, Donald F.; McMullen, Jeffery S.; Hornsby, Jeffrey S.; Jackson, Chad (1 May 2017). "Is your organization conducive to the continuous creation of social value? Toward a social corporate entrepreneurship scale". Business Horizons. 60 (3): 271–283. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2016.12.003. S2CID   157716734.
  21. Ogbari, Mercy Ejovwokeoghene; Oke, Adunola Oluremi; Ibukunoluwa, Adeyemo A.; Ajagbe, Musibau Akintunde; Ologbo, Andrew Cat (12 June 2016). "Entrepreneurship and Business Ethics: Implications on Corporate Performance". International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 6 (3S): 50–58. ProQuest   1809615223.
  22. Low, Mei Peng (2017). Linking Entrepreneurial Orientation and Internal Corporate Social Responsibility to Employees' Intention to Leave in Small Medium Sized Enterprises: The case of Malaysia (Thesis).
  23. Austin, J.; Leonard, H.; Reficco, E. and Wei-Skillern, J. in Social Entrepreneurship: New Models of Sustainable Social Change A. Nicholls, ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford. 2006b, pp. 169 – 181.
  24. Austin, J.; Leonard, H; Reficco, E. and Wei-Skillern, J. in The Accountable Corporation: Corporate Social Responsibility Volume 3 M. Epstein and K. Hanson, eds., Praeger, Westport, CT. 2006c, pp.237 – 247.
  25. Hemingway 2013a, p. 49-50.
  26. Summers, Donald B.; Dyck, Bruno (2011). "A Process Model of Social Intrapreneurship within a For-Profit Company: First Community Bank". Social and Sustainable Entrepreneurship. Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth. Vol. 13. pp. 139–174. doi:10.1108/S1074-7540(2011)0000013010. ISBN   978-1-78052-072-8.
  27. Orlitzky, Marc; Schmidt, Frank L.; Rynes, Sara L. (2003). "Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis". Organization Studies. 24 (3): 403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910. S2CID   8460439.
  28. Barnett, Michael L. (2007). "Stakeholder Influence Capacity and the Variability of Financial Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility". The Academy of Management Review. 32 (3): 794–816. doi:10.5465/amr.2007.25275520. JSTOR   20159336. S2CID   167584731.
  29. Rabinow, P. (ed.), Michael Foucault Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth, Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984 Volume 1, Penguin, London. 2000.
  30. Mason, P. PostCapitalism: A Guide to Our Future, Penguin, London. 2015
  31. "A guide to 'social intrapreneurs' and where to find them". TheGuardian.com . 31 January 2011.
  32. Venn, Ronald; Berg, Nicola (2013). "Building competitive advantage through social intrapreneurship". South Asian Journal of Global Business Research. 2: 104–127. doi:10.1108/20454451311303310.
  33. Hemingway 2013a, p. 86.
  34. Austin; Reficco, James; Ezequiel. "Corporate Social Entrepreneurship" (PDF).{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  35. Venn, Ronald; Berg, Nicola (2013). "Building competitive advantage through social intrapreneurship". South Asian Journal of Global Business Research. 2 (1): 104–127. doi:10.1108/20454451311303310.

Bibliography