Election court

Last updated

In United Kingdom election law, election court is a special court convened to hear a petition against the result of a local government or parliamentary election. The court is created to hear the individual case, and ceases to exist when it has made its decision.

Contents

Statutory basis

Election courts are governed by the Representation of the People Act 1983. [1] They are overseen by a rota of High Court (in England and Wales) or Court of Session (in Scotland) judges.

The election court is established following the presentation, to the High Court or Court of Session, of an election petition challenging the result of the election. The constitution of the court differs depending on whether the election being challenged is for a seat on a local council or in Parliament. In the case of a parliamentary election, the court comprises two of the High Court or Court of Session judges who are on the rota. [2] [3] In the case of a local government election in England and Wales, the judges appoint an experienced barrister as a commissioner to hear the case. [4] [5] In the case of a council election in Scotland, the case is heard by one or more sheriffs principal. [6] The Court sits in the parliamentary constituency, or in the local government area, in question. The election court ceases to exist when the case is concluded. [7]

Procedure

The election court tries the petition without a jury, [8] and has all the powers of the High Court or Court of Session. [2] Witnesses give evidence on oath, and a witness is not excused from answering a question even if the answer would incriminate him, although the answer cannot be used against him in any subsequent criminal proceedings (except in the case of a charge of perjury). [9] The trial itself is preceded by 'the scrutiny' in which the ballot papers are examined by an officer of the court (or, in rare cases, by the court itself) in order to establish a factual basis for the trial. The scrutiny may be attended by the parties and their lawyers, who can make representations to the person carrying out the scrutiny. [10]

After the judges trying a petition against the result of a parliamentary election have determined whether the successful candidate was validly elected or not, they issue a certificate of their decision to the Speaker of the House of Commons. [3] If the two judges disagree as to whether the election is valid, the original result of the election stands. [11] In the case of a local government election in England and Wales, the commissioner issues a certificate of their decision to the High Court (in Scotland, the commissioner's determination does not need to be certified to the Court of Session). [12]

In either case, if the election court considers that corrupt practices have taken place during the election, it also issues a report (to the Speaker or the High Court, as the case may be) stating whether it finds any candidate in the election guilty, either personally or by his agents, of corrupt practices. [13] The effect of such a report is that the candidate's election is void (if he had been successful originally), [14] and he is prohibited from holding any elected office for five years; in the case of some corrupt practices he may also be prohibited from voting in any election for the same period. [15] [16]

Appeal

There is no appeal from an election court on a question of fact, [17] but questions of law may be reviewed by the High Court or Court of Session by way of judicial review. [18]

Recent cases

Parliamentary

Two election petitions were lodged after the general election on 6 May 2010. The defeated Independent Rodney Connor, who lost in Fermanagh and South Tyrone by four votes, lodged a petition seeking a recount with scrutiny, [19] [20] and the case began on 13 September 2010. [21]

In the Oldham East and Saddleworth constituency, the defeated Liberal Democrat candidate Elwyn Watkins petitioned against the election of Phil Woolas, [22] a former Labour Minister, alleging that the result was affected by false statements of fact about his personal character. [23] The election court which heard the case ordered a re-run of the election in Woolas' constituency after finding him guilty of making false statements against his opponent during the original campaign. [24] [25] Phil Woolas sought a judicial review of the decision in the High Court, but was unsuccessful overall as that court upheld the decision of the election court in relation to two statements, whilst quashing the decision in relation to a third. [18]

Local elections

Recent cases in which election courts have ruled on the validity of elections include local government elections:

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill of Rights 1689</span> English civil rights legislation

The Bill of Rights 1689 is an Act of the Parliament of England that set out certain basic civil rights and clarified who would be next to inherit the Crown. It remains a crucial statute in English constitutional law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949</span> United Kingdom legislation establishing the supremacy of the House of Commons

The Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949 are two Acts of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, which form part of the constitution of the United Kingdom. Section 2(2) of the Parliament Act 1949 provides that the two Acts are to be construed as one.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Justice of the peace</span> Judicial officer elected or appointed to keep the peace and perform minor civic jobs

A justice of the peace (JP) is a judicial officer of a lower or puisne court, elected or appointed by means of a commission to keep the peace. In past centuries the term commissioner of the peace was often used with the same meaning. Depending on the jurisdiction, such justices dispense summary justice or merely deal with local administrative applications in common law jurisdictions. Justices of the peace are appointed or elected from the citizens of the jurisdiction in which they serve, and are usually not required to have any formal legal education in order to qualify for the office. Some jurisdictions have varying forms of training for JPs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Court of Session</span> Supreme civil court of Scotland

The Court of Session is the supreme civil court of Scotland and constitutes part of the College of Justice; the supreme criminal court of Scotland is the High Court of Justiciary. The Court of Session sits in Parliament House in Edinburgh and is both a trial court and a court of appeal. Decisions of the court can be appealed to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, with the permission of either the Inner House or the Supreme Court. The Court of Session and the local sheriff courts of Scotland have concurrent jurisdiction for all cases with a monetary value in excess of £100,000; the plaintiff is given first choice of court. However, the majority of complex, important, or high value cases are brought in the Court of Session. Cases can be remitted to the Court of Session from the sheriff courts, including the Sheriff Personal Injury Court, at the request of the presiding sheriff. Legal aid, administered by the Scottish Legal Aid Board, is available to persons with little disposable income for cases in the Court of Session.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Court of Justiciary</span> Supreme criminal court in Scotland

The High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court in Scotland. The High Court is both a trial court and a court of appeal. As a trial court, the High Court sits on circuit at Parliament House or in the adjacent former Sheriff Court building in the Old Town in Edinburgh, or in dedicated buildings in Glasgow and Aberdeen. The High Court sometimes sits in various smaller towns in Scotland, where it uses the local sheriff court building. As an appeal court, the High Court sits only in Edinburgh. On one occasion the High Court of Justiciary sat outside Scotland, at Zeist in the Netherlands during the Pan Am Flight 103 bombing trial, as the Scottish Court in the Netherlands. At Zeist the High Court sat both as a trial court, and an appeal court for the initial appeal by Abdelbaset al-Megrahi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Phil Woolas</span> British environmental consultant, political lobbyist and former television producer and politician

Philip James Woolas is a British environmental consultant, political lobbyist and former television producer and politician who served as Minister of State for Borders and Immigration from 2008 to 2010. A member of the Labour Party, he was Member of Parliament (MP) for Oldham East and Saddleworth from 1997 to 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Courts of Scotland</span> Administration of justice in Scotland

The courts of Scotland are responsible for administration of justice in Scotland, under statutory, common law and equitable provisions within Scots law. The courts are presided over by the judiciary of Scotland, who are the various judicial office holders responsible for issuing judgments, ensuring fair trials, and deciding on sentencing. The Court of Session is the supreme civil court of Scotland, subject to appeals to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, and the High Court of Justiciary is the supreme criminal court, which is only subject to the authority of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on devolution issues and human rights compatibility issues.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oldham East and Saddleworth (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1997 onwards

Oldham East and Saddleworth is a constituency in outer Greater Manchester represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since January 2011 by Debbie Abrahams of the Labour Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mid Bedfordshire (UK Parliament constituency)</span> Parliamentary constituency in the United Kingdom, 1918 onwards

Mid Bedfordshire is a constituency represented in the House of Commons of the UK Parliament since 2005 by Nadine Dorries, of the Conservative Party. Apart from four early years, the constituency has returned a Conservative since its creation in 1918.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Representation of the People Act 1983</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Representation of the People Act 1983 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It changed the British electoral process in the following ways:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corrupt practices</span>

Corrupt practices in English election law includes bribery, treating, undue influence, personation, and aiding, abetting, counselling and procuring personation.

An election petition refers to the procedure for challenging the result of a Parliamentary election.

Richard Mawrey, KC is a barrister and Deputy High Court Judge in the United Kingdom. He is a bencher of Gray's Inn and a member of Henderson Chambers. In his role as a judge in election cases, he has repeatedly criticised the postal voting system in the United Kingdom.

A Norwich Pharmacal order is a court order for the disclosure of documents or information that is available in the United Kingdom and Ireland. It is granted against a third party which has been innocently mixed up in wrongdoing, forcing the disclosure of documents or information. By identifying individuals the documents and information sought are disclosed in order to assist the applicant for such an order in bringing legal proceedings against individuals who are believed to have wronged the applicant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2011 Oldham East and Saddleworth by-election</span>

The 2011 by-election in Oldham East and Saddleworth was a by-election for the Parliament of the United Kingdom's House of Commons constituency of Oldham East and Saddleworth held on 13 January 2011. Labour Party candidate Debbie Abrahams held the seat for her party with an increased majority over the Liberal Democrats, succeeding Phil Woolas, whose victory in the 2010 general election had been declared void because he had knowingly made false statements attacking his Liberal Democrat opponent's personal character.

Robert Elwyn James Watkins, is a British Liberal Democrat politician. He narrowly lost to Labour Party candidate Phil Woolas for the Oldham East and Saddleworth seat in the 2010 general election, but the result was overturned by an election court, which found that Woolas had knowingly lied about Watkins' personal character. Watkins had stood down as a councillor representing Healey Ward on Rochdale Council in order to contest the general election. He was selected as the Liberal Democrat candidate for the constituency in late 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Judiciary of Scotland</span>

The judiciary of Scotland are the judicial office holders who sit in the courts of Scotland and make decisions in both civil and criminal cases. Judges make sure that cases and verdicts are within the parameters set by Scots law, and they must hand down appropriate judgments and sentences. Judicial independence is guaranteed in law, with a legal duty on Scottish Ministers, the Lord Advocate and the Members of the Scottish Parliament to uphold judicial independence, and barring them from influencing the judges through any form of special access.

<i>Erlam v Rahman</i>

Erlam and others v Rahman and another [2015] EWHC 1215 (QB) is an English election court case challenging the 2014 election of Lutfur Rahman as the Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets. On 23 April 2015, Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey voided Rahman's election under the Representation of the People Act 1983 on the grounds of corrupt and illegal practices by him and his agents, and general corruption so extensively prevailing so to reasonably supposed to have affected the election. Rahman's official election agent Alibor Choudhury was ordered to vacate his own office of councillor in the ward of Stepney Green for being guilty of corrupt and illegal practices.

<i>R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union</i> Constitutional decision of Supreme Court

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union is a United Kingdom constitutional law case decided by the United Kingdom Supreme Court on 24 January 2017, which ruled that the British Government might not initiate withdrawal from the European Union by formal notification to the Council of the European Union as prescribed by Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union without an Act of Parliament giving the government Parliament's permission to do so. Two days later, the government responded by bringing to Parliament the European Union Act 2017 for first reading in the House of Commons on 26 January 2017. The case is informally referred to as "the Miller case" or "Miller I".

Piers Andrew Charles Wauchope is a British barrister and politician who served as interim leader of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) between June and August 2019, following the resignation of Gerard Batten.

References

  1. ↑ Representation of the People Act 1983 official text at legislation.gov.uk
  2. 1 2 "Section 123". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  3. 1 2 Bradley, Anthony; Ewing, Keith (2006). Constitutional and Administrative Law. Longman. pp. 169–170. - limited preview available on Google Books
  4. ↑ "Section 130". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  5. ↑ Pilkington, Colin (1999). The Politics today companion to the British Constitution. Manchester University Press. p. 59. - limited preview available on Google Books
  6. ↑ "Section 134". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  7. ↑ Per Robert Goff LJ in R v Cripps ex p Muldoon [1984] 1 QB 68, confirmed by the Court of Appeal in "The Conservative and Unionist Party v The Election Commissioner (2010) EWCA Civ 1332". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 23 November 2010. Retrieved 30 November 2010.
  8. ↑ "Section 139". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  9. ↑ "Sections 140-141". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  10. ↑ Section 157(2). See also paragraphs 308-309 of the Commissioner's "Judgment in the matters of Local Government elections for the Bordesley Green and Aston Wards of the Birmingham City Council both held on 10th June 2004". HM Courts Service. 4 May 2005. Archived from the original on 1 November 2010. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
  11. ↑ "Section 144". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  12. ↑ "Section 145". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  13. ↑ "Section 158". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  14. ↑ "Section 159". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  15. ↑ "Section 160". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  16. ↑ Barnett, Hilaire (2004). Constitutional & administrative law. Routledge-Cavendish. p. 361. - limited preview available on Goodle Books
  17. ↑ "Section 144(1) and 145(1)". Legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 22 March 2017.
  18. 1 2 "R on the application of Woolas v The Parliamentary Election Court and others (2010) EWHC 3169 (Admin)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 3 December 2010. Retrieved 3 December 2010.
  19. ↑ Saunderson, Sarah (3 June 2010). "Connor asks High Court for election recount". The Impartial Reporter.
  20. ↑ "Election petition submitted to the High Court of Northern Ireland" (PDF). Electoral Office for Northern Ireland. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 15 September 2010.
  21. ↑ "Notice of Election Court" (PDF). Electoral Office for Northern Ireland. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 15 September 2010.
  22. ↑ "Losing candidate challenges Oldham election result". BBC. 28 May 2010. Retrieved 28 May 2010.
  23. ↑ Election Petition submitted to the High Court - Part 1 Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine , Part 2 Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine and Part 3 Archived 18 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine . Parts 2 and 3 includes copies of the election literature challenged. (Oldham Council website, retrieved 30 June 2010)
  24. ↑ "Judges order election re-run in ex-minister's seat". BBC News. 5 November 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
  25. ↑ "Watkins v Woolas 2010 EWHC 2702 (QB)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 5 November 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2010.
  26. ↑ "Court of Appeal decision in re Local government election for the Aberman South Ward of Rhonnda Cynon Taff County Borough Council 1997 EWCA Civ 1512". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 24 April 1997. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
  27. ↑ "Judgment in the matters of Local Government elections for the Bordesley Green and Aston Wards of the Birmingham City Council both held on 10th June 2004". HM Courts Service. 4 May 2005. Archived from the original on 1 November 2010. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
  28. ↑ "Aehmed v Afzal & Anor 2008 EWHC B5 (QB)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 2 April 2008. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
  29. ↑ "Simmons v Khan 2008 EWHC B4 (QB)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 18 March 2008. Retrieved 1 May 2010. and "The Conservative and Unionist Party v The Election Commissioner & Ors 2010 EWHC 285 (Admin)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute. 19 February 2010. Retrieved 1 May 2010.
  30. ↑ "Penlington-Pennington Denbighshire vote mix-up reversed". BBC News. 23 January 2013. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
  31. ↑ Finnerty, Joe (29 July 2013). "Councillor guilty of voting fraud". Get Surrey. Retrieved 24 March 2014.
  32. ↑ Syal, Rajeev; Quinn, Ben (23 April 2015). "Met considers criminal inquiry into Tower Hamlets mayor Lutfur Rahman". The Guardian.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.