Greenmail

Last updated

Greenmail or greenmailing is a financial maneuver where investors buy enough shares in a target company to threaten a hostile takeover, prompting the target company to buy back the shares at a premium to prevent the takeover. [1]

Contents

Corporate raids involve hostile takeovers of undervalued companies, sometimes through asset stripping or pressuring the sale of valuable assets like real estate. Greenmailers may offer to sell back their shares to the target company at a premium, resulting in losses for the company and its shareholders.

The tactic was used by investors such as T. Boone Pickens and Sir James Goldsmith in the 1980s, who made profits by pressuring companies into repurchasing shares at a premium. For instance, Goldsmith's group acquired stakes in companies like St. Regis, prompting buybacks at a higher price and yielding substantial profits.

Greenmail is a complex corporate strategy, but legal restrictions and counter-tactics, like imposing limits on formal bids and a 50% excise tax on gains in the United States, have made it less common since the early 1990s.

Term

The term is a financial neologism, coined in the 1980s, from blackmail and greenback as commentators and journalists saw the practice of corporate raiders as attempts by well-financed individuals, or their operating companies, to blackmail a company into handing over money by using the threat of a takeover. [2]

Tactic

Corporate raids occasionally aim to generate large amounts of money by hostile takeovers of large, often undervalued or inefficient (i.e. non-profit-maximizing) companies, by either asset stripping and/or replacing management and employees. In other circumstances, the greenmailer seeks out assets the target company has built up as equity, such as real estate, and attempts to have the target company dispose of those assets and lease them back via a recurring lease payment, while returning the sold-off real estate to shareholders as a special dividend.[ citation needed ]

The greenmail strategy has evolved since its first practices with ways to counter greenmail, other variations of greenmail, as well as ways to reinforce a greenmail tactic. In the area of mergers and acquisitions, the greenmail payment is made in an attempt to stop the hostile takeover. [3]

One example of this practice was the attempted takeover by William Ackman's Pershing Square Capital Management of American retailer Target, which had a large inventory of mature or nearly mature real estate properties in its corporate portfolio. Ackman attempted to have these assets spun off as an IPO, along with a partial sale of Target's credit card unit and the execution of share buybacks, which reduce the number of shares outstanding by using corporate equity and earnings to repurchase existing shareholders' positions. [4]

Once having secured a large share of a target company, instead of completing the hostile takeover, the greenmailer offers to end the threat to the victim company by selling his share back to it, but at a substantial premium to the fair market stock price.[ citation needed ]

From the viewpoint of the target, the ransom payment may be referred to as a goodbye kiss. The origin of the term goodbye kiss as a business metaphor is unclear. In reference to a President, Chairman, or CEO in charge of a target company being taken over, there are many situations in which a golden parachute is provided. A company which agrees to buy back the bidder's stockholding in the target avoids being taken over. In return, the bidder agrees to momentarily abandon the takeover attempt and may sign a confidential agreement with the greenmailee, guaranteeing not to resume the maneuver for a period of time.[ citation needed ]

While benefiting the corporate raider, the company and the company's shareholders lose money. Greenmail also momentarily protects the company's existing management and employees from termination, demotion, or reduction in wages, which would have most certainly seen their ranks reduced or eliminated had the hostile takeover successfully gone through.[ citation needed ]

Examples

Greenmail proved lucrative for investors such as T. Boone Pickens and Sir James Goldsmith during the 1980s. In the latter example, Goldsmith made $90 million from the Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company in the 1980s in this manner. In 1984, Occidental Petroleum paid $194 million greenmail to David Murdock. [5]

The St. Regis Paper Company provides an example of greenmail. When an investor group led by Sir James Goldsmith acquired 8.6% stake in St. Regis and expressed interest in taking over the paper concern, the company agreed to repurchase the shares at a premium. Goldsmith's group acquired the shares for an average price of $35.50 per share, a total of $109 million. It sold its stake at $52 per share, netting a profit of $51 million. Shortly after the payoff in March 1984, St. Regis became the target of publisher Rupert Murdoch. St Regis turned to Champion International and agreed to a $1.84 billion takeover. Murdoch tendered his 5.6% stake in St. Regis to the Champion offer for a profit. [6]

In a fictional context, greenmail tactics are prominently used in the 1987 film Wall Street . At one point, fellow corporate raider Sir Larry Wildman refers to Gordon Gekko as "a two-bit pirate and a greenmailer."[ citation needed ]

2024 Ohio case

In 2021, a plaintiff's law firm tried to sue two so-called "activist" investors in a Franklin County, Ohio court, alleging that the investors violated Ohio's law against greenmailing. Law firm Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP represented the Corpus Christi Firefighters’ Retirement System and filed the suit against two investment firms. In the suit, the plaintiff alleged that Macellum and Ancora attempted to engage in a greenmail campaign against Big Lots, a publicly traded discount retailer. [7] Ohio's statue would force the investors to give up any profits it earned from ownership of Big Lots stock if they had they engaged in greenmailing. However, the investors did not make any such attempt, according to RealClearMarkets. [8] In March 2024, Ohio Judge Daniel Hawkins - who is running for the Ohio Supreme Court [9] - dismissed the case. [10]

Other cases

A Harvard Business School case study in 1990 pointed to the repeated use of greenmail attempts by the Walt Disney Company - "a much criticized defensive tactic which Disney uses trying to buy enough time to fix its investment and financial strategies." [11]

In 2003, Michael Ashcroft was criticised by the High Court judge, Mr Justice Peter Smith in Rock (Nominees) Ltd v RCO (Holdings) Plc . [12] Smith condemned Ashcroft's tactics in relation to the takeover of cleaning company RCO by the Danish firm ISS. Smith said,

Euphemistically this practice – which I understand is a not unheard-of practice in the City [of London] – is described as "greenmail". The proper word to my mind is blackmail. It is the kind of thing which brings the City into disrepute ...

Justice Peter Smith [13]

History

Greenmail's use, as a strategy, is one of many corporate finance tactics. [14] [1] [15] The most cited 20th century legal precedents of stock manipulation, which set the foundation for tactics like Greenmail, were:

Cases

Significant pre-20th century precedents of stock manipulation, which set the foundation for tactics like Greenmail, were:

Historic Examples [18]

Prevention tactics

Greenmail is a financially sophisticated corporate business tactic, and many counter-tactics have been applied to defend against and to financially engineer the reception of a greenmail. [19] [20] There is a legal requirement in some jurisdictions for companies to impose limits for launching formal bids. United States Federal tax treatment of greenmail gains (a 50% excise tax), [21] legal restrictions, as well as counter-tactics have all made greenmail far less common since the early 1990s (see 26 U.S.C. § 5881, and 26 C.F.R. Part 156, notably § 156.5881-1 ff.).

Some U.S. states have enacted laws prohibiting greenmailing. In Ohio, for example, a state statute makes it illegal for someone who has made the intention of trying to acquire control of a company from disposing of their shares in that company within 18 months after making the intention. [22] New York's anti-greenmail law prohibits a corporation from buying back more than 10 percent of its stock from a shareholder for more than market value. It is only allowed if it is approved by both the board of directors and a majority of shareholders (excluding the shareholder in question attempting to sell back the stock). [23]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 ""Greenmail" Makes a Comeback". Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation . 2014-01-22. Archived from the original on 2019-01-07. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  2. "greenmail" Cornell Law School. Retrieved October 25 2022.
  3. "The Pioneers". Investopedia . Archived from the original on 1 November 2017. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  4. Ackman Says Target REIT IPO Would Raise $5.1 Billion (Update2), Bloomberg news, By Lauren Coleman-Lochner - November 19, 2008 20:00 EST
  5. Parrish, Michael (1992-03-21). "Occidental Ends Lawsuits Over Cost of Buyout: Settlement: Oxy will pay $3.65 million to shareholders who objected to the price David Murdock got for his shares in 1984". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 2013-10-29. Retrieved 25 October 2013.
  6. J. Fred Weston, Mark L.Mitchell J. Harold Mulherin—Takeovers, Restructuring, and Corporate Governance: page 529
  7. Riley, Kim (2024-02-16). "How one Ohio lawsuit could quell legitimate shareholder activism in the state". Financial Regulation News. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  8. Lubrano, Mike (2021-08-03). "Another Threat to Shareholders Emerges In Ohio | RealClearMarkets". www.realclearmarkets.com. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  9. Laura Hancock, cleveland com (2023-05-15). "3rd Republican judge announces campaign for Ohio Supreme Court". cleveland. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  10. Riley, Kim (2024-03-21). "Activist investors win greenmail case in Ohio". Financial Regulation News. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  11. "Walt Disney Productions: Greenmail - Case - Faculty & Research - Harvard Business School". www.hbs.edu. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  12. [2003] EWHC 936 (Ch), upheld in the Court of Appeal [2004] EWCA Civ 118, however Jonathan Parker LJ said, "That being so, it was in my judgment unnecessary and inappropriate for the judge to have expressed himself in such extreme language. However, the fact that he chose to express himself as he did has no impact on the conclusion which he reached on the issue of undervalue: a conclusion which, for the reasons I have given, was in my judgment plainly correct."
  13. Walsh, Conal; Antony Barnett (11 May 2003). "Ghost of Gekko in Ashcroft's greenmail". The Observer . London. Archived from the original on 11 September 2014. Retrieved 12 July 2009.
  14. "Management, Hostile Takeovers: Russian Style". Knowledge@Wharton . 2009-04-20. Archived from the original on 2019-07-03. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  15. Ronald D. Orol (2007). Extreme Value Hedging: How Activist Hedge Fund Managers Are Taking on the World. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 14, 22, 23, 329. ISBN   978-0-470-45024-6. Archived from the original on 2020-10-27. Retrieved 2020-10-02.
  16. Connie Bruck (1988). Predator's Ball. Penguin. pp. 233, 234. ISBN   978-0-949338-85-3. Archived from the original on 2020-10-27. Retrieved 2020-10-02.
  17. "GILLETTE DEAL ENDS REVLON BID". New York Times . 1986-11-25. Archived from the original on 2019-06-16. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  18. "Hushmail: Are Activist Hedge Funds Breaking Bad?". Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation . 2014-07-07. Archived from the original on 2015-05-16. Retrieved 17 November 2017.
  19. "Hostile Takeover Defenses". Slideshare. 5 November 2010. Archived from the original on 2016-12-05. Retrieved 2017-08-15.
  20. "The Rise of Investor-Centric Activism Defense Strategy". Harvard Law School . Archived from the original on 2017-07-05. Retrieved 2017-08-15.
  21. "IRS Form 8725: Excise Tax on Greenmail" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-05-04. Retrieved 2017-08-10.
  22. Elman, David (2021-09-01). "Big Lots Lawsuit Puts Greenmail Under Microscope in Ohio". The Deal. Retrieved 2024-05-14.
  23. Granata, Enrico; Klein, Spencer (2014-01-22). ""Greenmail" Makes a Comeback". The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance. Retrieved 2024-05-14.

Related Research Articles

A shareholder rights plan, colloquially known as a "poison pill", is a type of defensive tactic used by a corporation's board of directors against a takeover.

In business, a takeover is the purchase of one company by another. In the UK, the term refers to the acquisition of a public company whose shares are listed on a stock exchange, in contrast to the acquisition of a private company.

In business, a corporate raid is the process of buying a large stake in a corporation and then using shareholder voting rights to require the company to undertake novel measures designed to increase the share value, generally in opposition to the desires and practices of the corporation's current management. The measures might include replacing top executives, downsizing operations, or liquidating the company.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joint-stock company</span> Business entity owned by shareholders

A joint-stock company (JSC) is a business entity in which shares of the company's stock can be bought and sold by shareholders. Each shareholder owns company stock in proportion, evidenced by their shares. Shareholders are able to transfer their shares to others without any effects to the continued existence of the company.

Shareholder activism is a form of activism in which shareholders use equity stakes in a corporation to put pressure on its management. A fairly small stake may be enough to launch a successful campaign. In comparison, a full takeover bid is a much more costly and difficult undertaking. The goals of shareholder activism range from financial to non-financial. Shareholder activists can address self-dealing by corporate insiders, although large stockholders can also engage in self-dealing to themselves at the expense of smaller minority shareholders.

Demutualization is the process by which a customer-owned mutual organization (mutual) or co-operative changes legal form to a joint stock company. It is sometimes called stocking or privatization. As part of the demutualization process, members of a mutual usually receive a "windfall" payout, in the form of shares in the successor company, a cash payment, or a mixture of both. Mutualization or mutualisation is the opposite process, wherein a shareholder-owned company is converted into a mutual organization, typically through takeover by an existing mutual organization. Furthermore, re-mutualization depicts the process of aligning or refreshing the interest and objectives of the members of the mutual society.

Non-voting stock is the stock that provides the shareholder very little or no vote on corporate matters, such as election of the board of directors or mergers. This type of share is usually implemented for individuals who want to invest in the company's profitability and success at the expense of voting rights in the direction of the company. Preferred stock typically has non-voting qualities.

The term standstill agreement refers to various forms of agreement which may be entered into in order to delay action which might otherwise take place.

<i>Other Peoples Money</i> 1991 film by Norman Jewison

Other People's Money is a 1991 American romantic comedy-drama film directed by Norman Jewison, starring Danny DeVito, Gregory Peck and Penelope Ann Miller. It was adapted by screenwriter Alvin Sargent from the 1989 play of the same name by Jerry Sterner.

A special purpose acquisition company, also known as a "blank check company", is a shell corporation listed on a stock exchange with the purpose of acquiring a private company, thus making the private company public without going through the initial public offering process, which often carries significant procedural and regulatory burdens. According to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), SPACs are created specifically to pool funds to finance a future merger or acquisition opportunity within a set timeframe; these opportunities usually have yet to be identified while raising funds.

Share repurchase, also known as share buyback or stock buyback, is the reacquisition by a company of its own shares. It represents an alternate and more flexible way of returning money to shareholders. When used in coordination with increased corporate leverage, buybacks can increase share prices.

<i>Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.</i>

Unocal v. Mesa Petroleum Co., 493 A.2d 946 is a landmark decision of the Delaware Supreme Court on corporate defensive tactics against take-over bids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bill Ackman</span> American billionaire hedge fund manager

William Albert Ackman is an American billionaire hedge fund manager who is the founder and chief executive officer of Pershing Square Capital Management, a hedge fund management company. His investment approach has made him an activist investor. As of January 2024, Ackman's net worth was estimated at $4 billion by Forbes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom company law</span> Law that regulates corporations formed under the Companies Act 2006

The United Kingdom company law regulates corporations formed under the Companies Act 2006. Also governed by the Insolvency Act 1986, the UK Corporate Governance Code, European Union Directives and court cases, the company is the primary legal vehicle to organise and run business. Tracing their modern history to the late Industrial Revolution, public companies now employ more people and generate more of wealth in the United Kingdom economy than any other form of organisation. The United Kingdom was the first country to draft modern corporation statutes, where through a simple registration procedure any investors could incorporate, limit liability to their commercial creditors in the event of business insolvency, and where management was delegated to a centralised board of directors. An influential model within Europe, the Commonwealth and as an international standard setter, UK law has always given people broad freedom to design the internal company rules, so long as the mandatory minimum rights of investors under its legislation are complied with.

The Bull-dog Sauce Case is a Supreme Court of Japan case that resulted in a landmark decision regarding hostile takeover defense plans. The Court held that such plans do not necessarily violate the principle of shareholder equality under Japanese statutes, even if they result in discriminatory treatment some shareholders; however, such decisions must be made by shareholders themselves, acting in the company's best interest; they cannot be made by management to protect itself. The Bull-dog Sauce case arose from the first use of a poison pill by a Japanese company, and resulted in the Supreme Court's first ruling on the subject of takeover defenses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Private equity in the 1980s</span>

Private equity in the 1980s relates to one of the major periods in the history of private equity and venture capital. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub-industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel although interrelated tracks.

In mergers and acquisitions, a mandatory offer, also called a mandatory bid in some jurisdictions, is an offer made by one company to purchase some or all outstanding shares of another company, as required by securities laws and regulations or stock exchange rules governing corporate takeovers. Most countries, with the notable exception of the United States, have provisions requiring mandatory offers.

The following is a glossary which defines terms used in mergers, acquisitions, and takeovers of companies, whether private or public.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pershing Square Capital Management</span> American hedge fund

Pershing Square Capital Management is an American hedge fund management company founded and run by Bill Ackman, headquartered in New York City.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul Bilzerian</span> American businessman

Paul Alec Bilzerian is an American businessman and corporate takeover specialist.

References