Ideal theory (politics)

Last updated

In political philosophy, an ideal theory is a theory which specifies the optimal societal structure based on idealised assumptions and normative theory. It stems from the assumption that citizens are fully compliant to a state which enjoys favorable social conditions, which makes it unrealistic in character. [1]   Ideal theories do not offer solutions to real world problems, [2] instead the aim of ideal theory is to provide a guide for improvements based on what society should normatively appear to be. Another interpretation of ideal theories is that they are end-state theories. [3]

Ideal theory is contrasted with non-ideal theory in political philosophy. Scholars such as Amartya Sen provide a critique on ideal theory as an approach for being too idealistic and unnecessary. [4]

The distinction between ideal theory and non-ideal theory was first proposed by John Rawls in A Theory of Justice . Rawls' reasoning behind using ideal theory is that it provides a necessary base for non-ideal theories to follow. [5] His conception of the world in his work is based on an ideal perfect society. In this society, principles of justice are created behind a “veil of ignorance”,  which situates citizens outside their social position in order for them to bargain without the influence of their self-interest. [6] The main claim of Rawls’ ideal hypothesis is that there would be no disadvantaged or advantaged group, therefore, a situation of ideal equal fairness would be in place. [6]

Ideal theory vs. non- ideal theory

Ideal theory assumes full compliance, citizens are subject to the rules of a state and fully adhere to them. [7] These rules need not be just but the compliance to them is what contributes to the optimum of a society. [1] Rules in ideal theory often outline what ought to take precedence in order for favorable conditions to appear and be maintained. [1] In contrast with the principle of full compliance of ideal theory, partial compliance is a characteristic of non-ideal theory. Full compliance cannot be realised within non-ideal theories because these take into consideration unfavourable social conditions which lead to negative consequences such as crises. [3] Partial compliance more closely resembles a realistic social configuration of today, thus another feature that differs between ideal and non-ideal theories is the realistic elements in each. [7]

In terms of idealisation and reality, Colin Farelly [8] and Charles Mills [9] suggest that normative debates cannot be addressed by ideal theory because the assumptions on which these rest are false. This also forms part of the criticism given by Amartya Sen, who argues that ideal theory is too idealistic. [4] Instead, non-ideal theory provides proposals based on situations which are observable in social reality. [2]

Ideal theory provides a view of how society ought to be like and indicates the principles that have to be in place in order to achieve it. [7] This idealized vision exists as a long term goal or something to strive to due to the assumptions it lies upon. This qualifies ideal theory as an end-state theory. [3] Non-ideal theory is seen as a transitional theory because the means through which social issues are presented are through improvements which are based on the existing social reality instead of an out-of-reach vision.

Related Research Articles

Justice Concept of moral fairness and administration of the law

Justice, in its broadest sense, is the principle that people receive that which they deserve, with the interpretation of what then constitutes "deserving" being impacted upon by numerous fields, with many differing viewpoints and perspectives, including the concepts of moral correctness based on ethics, rationality, law, religion, equity and fairness.

John Rawls American political philosopher

John Bordley Rawls was an American moral and political philosopher in the liberal tradition. Rawls received both the Schock Prize for Logic and Philosophy and the National Humanities Medal in 1999, the latter presented by President Bill Clinton, in recognition of how Rawls's work "helped a whole generation of learned Americans revive their faith in democracy itself".

Analytic philosophy Style of philosophy

Analytic philosophy is a branch and tradition of philosophy using analysis which is popular in the Western World and particularly the Anglosphere, which began around the turn of the 20th century in the contemporary era and continues today. In the United Kingdom, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Scandinavia, the majority of university philosophy departments today identify themselves as "analytic" departments.

Original position State of nature where individuals determine the structure of society ignorant of their position

The original position (OP), often referred to as the veil of ignorance, is a thought experiment developed by American philosopher John Rawls to discover the principles that should structure a society of free, equal and moral people. Rawls claims that his Principles of Justice would be chosen by parties in the original position.

Reflective equilibrium is a state of balance or coherence among a set of beliefs arrived at by a process of deliberative mutual adjustment among general principles and particular judgments. Although he did not use the term, philosopher Nelson Goodman introduced the method of reflective equilibrium as an approach to justifying the principles of inductive logic. The term 'reflective equilibrium' was coined by John Rawls and popularized in his A Theory of Justice as a method for arriving at the content of the principles of justice.

<i>A Theory of Justice</i> 1971 book by John Rawls

A Theory of Justice is a 1971 work of political philosophy and ethics by the philosopher John Rawls, in which the author attempts to provide a moral theory alternative to utilitarianism and that addresses the problem of distributive justice. The theory uses an updated form of Kantian philosophy and a variant form of conventional social contract theory. Rawls's theory of justice is fully a political theory of justice as opposed to other forms of justice discussed in other disciplines and contexts.

In philosophy, economics, and political science, the common good refers to either what is shared and beneficial for all or most members of a given community, or alternatively, what is achieved by citizenship, collective action, and active participation in the realm of politics and public service. The concept of the common good differs significantly among philosophical doctrines. Early conceptions of the common good were set out by Ancient Greek philosophers, including Aristotle and Plato. One understanding of the common good rooted in Aristotle's philosophy remains in common usage today, referring to what one contemporary scholar calls the "good proper to, and attainable only by, the community, yet individually shared by its members."

Normative generally means relating to an evaluative standard. Normativity is the phenomenon in human societies of designating some actions or outcomes as good or desirable or permissible and others as bad or undesirable or impermissible. A norm in this normative sense means a standard for evaluating or making judgments about behavior or outcomes. Normative is sometimes also used, somewhat confusingly, to mean relating to a descriptive standard: doing what is normally done or what most others are expected to do in practice. In this sense a norm is not evaluative, a basis for judging behavior or outcomes; it is simply a fact or observation about behavior or outcomes, without judgment. Many researchers in this field try to restrict the use of the term normative to the evaluative sense and refer to the description of behavior and outcomes as positive, descriptive, predictive, or empirical.

Normative economics is a part of economics whose objective is fairness or what the outcome of the economy or goals of public policy ought to be.

Robert Paul Wolff

Robert Paul Wolff is an American political philosopher and professor emeritus at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.

Philosophy and economics, also philosophy of economics, studies topics such as rational choice, the appraisal of economic outcomes, institutions and processes, the status of highly idealized economic models, the ontology of economic phenomena and the possibilities of acquiring knowledge of them.

David Schmidtz is a Canadian-American philosopher serving as Kendrick Professor of Philosophy and Eller Chair of Service-Dominant Logic at the University of Arizona, and editor-in-chief of the journal Social Philosophy and Policy. He was also the inaugural head of the Department of Political Economy and Moral Science at the University of Arizona.

<i>The Law of Peoples</i>

The Law of Peoples is American philosopher John Rawls' work on international relations. First published in 1993 as a short article, in 1999 it was expanded and joined with another essay, "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited" to form a full-length book. Rawls's basic distinction in international politics is that his preferred emphasis on a society of peoples is separate from the more conventional discussion of international politics as based upon relationships between states. It is an attempt to show "how the content of a Law of Peoples might be developed out of a liberal idea of justice similar to, but more general than, the idea I call justice as fairness".

Global justice

Global justice is an issue in political philosophy arising from the concern about unfairness. It is sometimes understood as a form of internationalism.

"Instrumental" and "value rationality" are terms scholars use to identify two ways humans reason when coordinating group behaviour to maintain social life. Instrumental rationality recognizes means that "work" efficiently to achieve ends. Value rationality recognizes ends that are "right," legitimate in themselves.

Justice in economics is a subcategory of welfare economics. It is a "set of moral and ethical principles for building economic institutions." Economic justice aims to create opportunities for every person to have a dignified, productive and creative life that extends beyond simple economics.

<i>The Idea of Justice</i> 2009 book by Amartya Sen

The Idea of Justice is a 2009 book by the economist Amartya Sen. The work is a critique and revision of the philosopher John Rawls's A Theory of Justice (1971).

<i>The Racial Contract</i>

The Racial Contract is an essay by the Jamaican philosopher Charles W. Mills in which he attempts to show that, although it is conventional to represent the social contract moral and political theories of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and Immanuel Kant as neutral with respect to race and ethnicity, in actuality, the philosophers understood them to regulate only relations between whites; in relation to non-whites, these philosophers helped to create a "racial contract", which in both formal and informal ways permitted whites to oppress and exploit non-whites and violate their own moral ideals in dealing with non-whites. Because in contemporary political philosophy, white philosophers take their own white privilege for granted, they don't recognize that white supremacy is a political system, and so in their developments of ideal, moral and political theory never consider actual practice. Mills proposes to develop a non-ideal theory "to explain and expose the inequities of the actual nonideal policy and to help us see through the theories and moral justifications offered in defense of them." Using it as a central concept, "the notion of a Racial Contract might be more revealing of the real character of the world we are living in, and the corresponding historical deficiencies of its normative theories and practices, than the raceless notions currently dominant in political theory."

Analytical Marxism

Analytical Marxism is an approach to Marxist theory that was prominent amongst English-speaking philosophers and social scientists during the 1980s. It was mainly associated with the September Group of academics, so called because of their biennial September meetings to discuss common interests. Described by G. A. Cohen as "non-bullshit Marxism", the group was characterized, in the words of David Miller, by "clear and rigorous thinking about questions that are usually blanketed by ideological fog." Members of this school seek to apply the techniques of analytic philosophy, along with tools of modern social science such as rational choice theory, to the elucidation of the theories of Karl Marx and his successors.

Philosophy of ecology

Philosophy of ecology is a concept under the philosophy of science, which is a subfield of philosophy. Its main concerns centre on the practice and application of ecology, its moral issues, and the intersectionality between the position of humans and other entities. This topic also overlaps with metaphysics, ontology, and epistemology, for example, as it attempts to answer metaphysical, epistemic and moral issues surrounding environmental ethics and public policy.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Robeyns, Ingrid (2008). "Ideal Theory in Theory and Practice". Social Theory and Practice. 34 (3): 341–362. doi:10.5840/soctheorpract200834321. ISSN   0037-802X.
  2. 1 2 Stemplowska, Zofia (2017-05-15), "What's Ideal About Ideal Theory?", Theories of Justice, Routledge, pp. 205–232, doi:10.4324/9781315236322-32, ISBN   978-1-315-23632-2
  3. 1 2 3 Loureiro, Marco (2015). "Ideal Theory and Its Applicability: Are Principles Independent from Facts?". Revista Diacrítica. 29 (2): 231–250. ISSN   0870-8967.
  4. 1 2 Schmidtz, David (2011). "Nonideal Theory: What It Is and What It Needs to Be". Ethics. 121 (4): 772–796. doi:10.1086/660816. ISSN   0014-1704. JSTOR   10.1086/660816. S2CID   144510752.
  5. ↑ Stemplowska, Zofia; Swift, Adam (2012-06-18). Estlund, David (ed.). "Ideal and Nonideal Theory". The Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.001.0001. ISBN   9780195376692 . Retrieved 2020-05-15.
  6. 1 2 Rawls, John, 1921-2002, author. (December 2005). A theory of justice. ISBN   978-81-7534-175-3. OCLC   908122343.CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  7. 1 2 3 Valentini, Laura (2012-08-22). "Ideal vs. Non-ideal Theory: A Conceptual Map". Philosophy Compass. 7 (9): 654–664. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00500.x. ISSN   1747-9991.
  8. ↑ Farrelly, Colin (December 2007). "Justice in Ideal Theory: A Refutation". Political Studies. 55 (4): 844–864. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00656.x. ISSN   0032-3217. S2CID   145781022.
  9. ↑ Mills, Charles W. (2017-05-15), ""Ideal Theory" As Ideology", Theories of Justice, Routledge, pp. 565–584, doi:10.4324/9781315236322-31, ISBN   978-1-315-23632-2
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.