Iraq War and the war on terror

Last updated
On 19 March 2003, President George W. Bush addressed the nation from the Oval Office, announcing the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom. "The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder." The Senate committee found that many of the administration's pre-war statements about Iraqi WMD were not supported by the underlying intelligence. Bush announces Operation Iraqi Freedom 2003.jpg
On 19 March 2003, President George W. Bush addressed the nation from the Oval Office, announcing the beginning of Operation Iraqi Freedom. "The people of the United States and our friends and allies will not live at the mercy of an outlaw regime that threatens the peace with weapons of mass murder." The Senate committee found that many of the administration's pre-war statements about Iraqi WMD were not supported by the underlying intelligence.

The Iraq War, along with the War in Afghanistan, was described by President of the United States George W. Bush as "the central front in the War on Terror", and argued that if the U.S. pulled out of Iraq, "terrorists will follow us here." [2] [3] [4]

Contents

"War on terror" discourse dominated US media outlets for several post-9/11 years. In 2003, majority of Americans believed Iraqi-links to 9/11 conspiracy theory, which facilitated the Bush administration's agenda for the invasion of Iraq. Throughout the 2000s, political consensus in United States juxtaposed Iraq within the framework of the "war on terror". Despite the emergence of dissent to the consensus in the late 2000s; Republican politicians, candidates and advocacy groups continued to paint the Iraq-centric strategy as the solution to the "9/11 problem". [5]

As the conflict dragged on, members of the U.S. Congress, the American public, and even U.S. troops have questioned the connection between the Iraq War and the fight against terrorism. Multiple leading intelligence experts have argued that the war in Iraq actually increased terrorism. The ensuing conflict in Iraq has seen prolonged American involvement in the country against multiple terrorist and non-terrorist groups.

Framing of Iraq War

"The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001, and still goes on. That terrible morning, 19 evil men -- the shock troops of a hateful ideology -- gave America and the civilized world a glimpse of their ambitions. They imagined, in the words of one terrorist, that September the 11th would be the "beginning of the end of America"... The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror. We've removed an ally of al Qaeda, and cut off a source of terrorist funding. And this much is certain: No terrorist network will gain weapons of mass destruction from the Iraqi regime, because the regime is no more... Our mission continues. Al Qaeda is wounded, not destroyed... The war on terror is not over; yet it is not endless. We do not know the day of final victory, but we have seen the turning of the tide."

US President George W. Bush, "Mission Accomplished" speech (1 May 2003) [6] [7]

The National Strategy of Combating Terrorism published by the US government in 2003 pitted a dualistic "us vs them" narrative, defining America's enemy as "terrorism". In a presidential letter to the Speaker of House of Representatives delivered a day after the launch of the Iraq invasion, Bush claimed that Ba'athist Iraq harboured and supported terrorists that carried out the September 11 attacks. [8] [9] The National Security Strategy of 2006 associated terrorism with rogue regimes across the world which "hate the United States and everything for which it stands". Throughout the Iraqi insurgency, the US government depicted Iraq as a crucial frontline to eliminate the "geographic base" of the terrorists who perpetrated 9/11 attacks. [10]

During the 2004 presidential campaign, Republican strategy was based on exaggerating the Iraqi 9/11 conspiracy theory and presenting the Iraq war as a major front in the "war on terror". Rival presidential candidate John Kerry also agreed with this narrative, criticizing the Bush administration's pitfalls for not organizing a "smarter, tougher, more effective war on terror". [11] So pervasive was the propaganda that the military campaigns were often compared to the Second World War and the US president linked Hurricane Katrina with the "war on terror" efforts. [12] [13] However, after repeated failures in the Iraq war and rising war-weariness, these narratives became controversial within the United States starting from the late 2000s. Despite acknowledging that Ba'athist Iraq had no links to 9/11 attacks in 2007, the Bush administration continued to justify the prolongation of the Iraq War in the post-9/11 framework, claiming that a defeat in Iraq would make the United States "vulnerable" to external threats. [14]

As Coalition Forces arrive at a car bombing in South Baghdad, a second car bomb is detonated, targeting those responding to the initial incident. April 14, 2005 Car bomb in Iraq.jpg
As Coalition Forces arrive at a car bombing in South Baghdad, a second car bomb is detonated, targeting those responding to the initial incident. April 14, 2005

According to the Israel Intelligence Heritage & Commemoration Center, Saddam Hussein had a long history before the invasion of giving money to families of suicide bombers in Palestine. [15] As part of the justification for the war, the Bush administration argued that Saddam Hussein also had ties to al-Qaeda, and that his overthrow would lead to democratization in the Middle East, decreasing terrorism overall. [16] However, reports from the CIA, the U.S. State Department, the FBI, and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, as well as the investigations of foreign intelligence agencies found no evidence of an operational connection between Saddam and al-Qaeda. [17]

Various intelligence experts have asserted that the Iraq war only served to exponentially increase terrorism. Counterterrorism expert Rohan Gunaratna frequently refers to the invasion of Iraq as a "fatal mistake." [18] London's conservative International Institute for Strategic Studies concluded in 2004 that the occupation of Iraq had become "a potent global recruitment pretext" for jihadists, and that the invasion "galvanized" al-Qaeda and "perversely inspired insurgent violence" there. [19] The U.S. National Intelligence Council concluded in a January 2005 report that Iraq had overtaken Afghanistan as the primary training ground for the next generation of jihadist terrorists. [20] The council's chairman, Robert L. Hutchings, said, "At the moment, Iraq is a magnet for international terrorist activity." [21] And the 2006 National Intelligence Estimate, which outlined the considered judgment of all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies, held that "The Iraq conflict has become the 'cause celebre' for jihadists, breeding a deep resentment of US involvement in the Muslim world and cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement." [22] According to Mohammed Hafez, "Since 2003, the number of suicide bombings in Iraq has surpassed all those of Hamas in Israel, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka combined." [23]

Al-Qaeda

The bombing of Al Sabaah, 2006 US Navy 060827-N-6477M-617 A Vehicle Born Improvised Explosive Devise (VBIED) after exploding on a street outside of the Al Sabah newspaper office in the Waziryia district of Baghdad, Iraq.jpg
The bombing of Al Sabaah , 2006

In October 2003, Osama bin Laden announced: "Be glad of the good news: America is mired in the swamps of the Tigris and Euphrates. Bush is, through Iraq and its oil, easy prey. Here is he now, thank God, in an embarrassing situation and here is America today being ruined before the eyes of the whole world."[ excessive quote ] [24] Al-Qaeda commander Seif al-Adl gloated about the war in Iraq, indicating, "The Americans took the bait and fell into our trap." [25] A letter thought to be from al-Qaeda leader Atiyah Abd al-Rahman found in Iraq among the rubble where al-Zarqawi was killed and released by the U.S. military in October 2006, indicated that al-Qaeda perceived the war as beneficial to its goals: "The most important thing is that the jihad continues with steadfastness ... indeed, prolonging the war is in our interest.". [26]

ISIS

From 2011, the conflict in Iraq shifted into the fight against the Islamic State. From 2011 to 2013, this insurgency was marked by the rapid rise of the Islamic State of Iraq, escalating dramatically during the War in Iraq (2013–2017). This conflict continues as part of a low-level insurgency from the Islamic State since 2017.

Public opinion

At the outset of the war, the U.S. Congress and public opinion supported the notion that the Iraq War was part of the global war on terror. The 2002 congressional resolution authorising military force against Iraq cited the U.S. determination to "prosecute the war on terrorism", and in April 2003, one month after the invasion, a poll found that 77% of Americans agreed that the Iraq War was part of the war on terror. [27] Much of the organized violence encountered by the U.S. military was framed by the metaphor of a crusade, or total conflict, that was taken up by the terrorists. [28] In 2004, an Army War College report said the war diverts attention and resources from the threat posed by Al Qaeda and called for downsizing the war on terror and focusing instead on the threat from Al Qaeda. [29]

As the military and civilian death toll has mounted, the Iraqi insurgency has shifted to what many observers have labeled a civil war, and the politics of Iraq have remained unstable, many politicians and citizens from the United States and across the world have begun pushing for the U.S. to withdraw from Iraq. [30] [31] Throughout the 2000s, US media outlets, politicians and wider public viewed the military operations in Iraq as an integral part of the "war on terror".

In spring 2007, surveys showed a majority of Americans in support of a timetable for withdrawal. [32] While up to 70 percent of Americans in one survey favored withdrawal, most preferred to leave gradually over 12 months, and 60 percent stated that the U.S. had a moral obligation to the Iraqi people. [33] In addition to voicing concerns over the human and financial costs of the war, supporters of withdrawal argue that the U.S. presence fosters ongoing violence by providing a target for al-Qaeda. It also allows Iraqi political leaders to avoid reaching a power-sharing agreement. The withdrawal will induce Iraq's neighbors to become more involved in quelling violence in the country and will relieve the strain on the U.S. military. [31] The withdrawal debate has brought comparison of Iraq and Vietnam wars. [34] [35]

After the 2006 midterm congressional elections, Congress pushed to begin withdrawing troops from Iraq, in part based on the argument that Iraq was a distraction, as opposed to a part of, the war on terror. Likewise, a January 2007 poll found that 57% of Americans felt that the Iraq War was not part of the war on terror. [36] [37] By June 2007, polls revealed that only 30% of Americans supported the war. [38] [39] On July 12, 2007, the House passed a resolution by 223 to 201, for redeployment [or withdrawal] of U.S. armed forces out of Iraq. The resolution required most troops to withdraw from Iraq by April 1, 2008. [40] [41]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Al-Qaeda</span> Pan-Islamic Sunni Jihadist terrorist organization (established 1988)

Al-Qaeda is a pan-Islamist militant organization led by Sunni Jihadists who self-identify as a vanguard spearheading a global Islamist revolution to unite the Muslim world under a supra-national Islamic state known as the Caliphate. Its members are mostly composed of Arabs, but also include people from other ethnic groups. Al-Qaeda has mounted attacks on civilian, economic and military targets of the US and its allies; such as the 1998 US embassy bombings, the USS Cole bombing and the September 11 attacks. The organization is designated as a terrorist group by NATO, UN Security Council, the European Union, and various countries around the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ansar al-Islam in Kurdistan</span> Salafi jihadist militant group in Iraq and Syria

Ansar al-Islam in Kurdistan, simply called Ansar al-Islam, is a Kurdish Islamist militant and separatist group. It was established in northern Iraq around the Kurdistan Region by Kurdish Islamists who were former Taliban and former Al-Qaeda volunteers, which were coming back from Afghanistan in 2001 after the Fall of Kabul. Its motive is to establish an Islamic state around the Kurdistan region and to protect Kurdish people from other armed insurgent groups. It imposed strict Sharia in villages it controlled around Byara near the Iranian border.

Criticism of the war on terror addresses the morals, ethics, efficiency, economics, as well as other issues surrounding the war on terror. It also touches upon criticism against the phrase itself, which was branded as a misnomer. The notion of a "war" against "terrorism" has proven highly contentious, with critics charging that participating governments exploited it to pursue long-standing policy/military objectives, reduce civil liberties, and infringe upon human rights. It is argued by critics that the term war is not appropriate in this context, since there is no identifiable enemy and that it is unlikely international terrorism can be brought to an end by military means.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration</span> Overview of the foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration

The main event by far shaping the foreign policy of the United States during the presidency of George W. Bush (2001–2009) was the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11, 2001, and the subsequent war on terror. There was massive domestic and international support for destroying the attackers. With UN approval, US and NATO forces quickly invaded the attackers' base in Afghanistan and drove them out and the Taliban government that harbored them. It was the start of a 20-year quagmire that finally ended in failure with the withdrawal of United States troops from Afghanistan.

Michael F. Scheuer, is an American former intelligence officer for the Central Intelligence Agency, blogger, author, commentator and former adjunct professor at Georgetown University's Center for Peace and Security Studies. One assignment during his 22-year career was serving as Chief of the Bin Laden Issue Station from 1996 to 1999. He also served as Special Advisor to the Chief of Alec Station from September 2001 to November 2004.

The Saddam–al-Qaeda conspiracy theory was based on false claims made by the United States government, alleging that a highly secretive relationship existed between Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and the Sunni pan-Islamist militant organization al-Qaeda between 1992 and 2003. The George W. Bush administration promoted it as a main rationale for invading Iraq in 2003.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen F. Hayes</span> American journalist

Stephen Forester Hayes is an American journalist and author. In October 2019 Hayes co-founded the online opinion and news publication The Dispatch. Previously, he was a senior writer for National Journal and Editor-in-chief of The Weekly Standard. He was a staunch proponent of the Iraq War and an influential figure in promoting the claim that the Saddam Hussein regime and Al Qaeda had an operational relationship.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rationale for the Iraq War</span> U.S. claims and arguments for invading Iraq

There are various rationales for the Iraq War, both the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the subsequent hostilities. The George W. Bush administration began actively pressing for military intervention in Iraq in late 2001. The primary rationalization for the Iraq War was articulated by a joint resolution of the United States Congress known as the Iraq Resolution. The US claimed the intent was to "disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's alleged support for terrorism, and to supposedly free Iraqi people".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paul R. Pillar</span>

Paul R. Pillar is an academic and 28-year veteran of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), serving from 1977 to 2005. He is now a non-resident senior fellow at Georgetown University's Center for Security Studies, as well as a nonresident senior fellow in the Brookings Institution's Center for 21st Century Security and Intelligence. He was a visiting professor at Georgetown University from 2005 to 2012. He is a contributor to The National Interest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iraq War</span> War in Iraq from 2003 to 2011

The Iraq War was a protracted armed conflict in Iraq from 2003 to 2011. It began with the invasion of Iraq by the United States-led coalition that overthrew the Ba'athist government of Saddam Hussein. The conflict continued for much of the next decade as an insurgency emerged to oppose the coalition forces and the post-invasion Iraqi government. US troops were officially withdrawn in 2011. The United States became re-involved in 2014 at the head of a new coalition, and the insurgency and many dimensions of the armed conflict are ongoing. The invasion occurred as part of the George W. Bush administration's war on terror following the September 11 attacks.

This article is a chronological listing of allegations of meetings between members of al-Qaeda and members of Saddam Hussein's government, as well as other information relevant to conspiracy theories involving Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Abu Musab al-Zarqawi</span> Jordanian jihadist (1966–2006)

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, born Ahmad Fadeel al-Nazal al-Khalayleh, was a Jordanian jihadist who ran a terrorist training camp in Afghanistan. He became known after going to Iraq and being responsible for a series of bombings, beheadings, and attacks during the Iraq War, reportedly "turning an insurgency against US troops" in Iraq "into a Shia–Sunni civil war". He was sometimes known by his supporters as the "Sheikh of the slaughterers".

Evan F. Kohlmann is an American terrorism consultant who has worked for the FBI and other governmental organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War on terror</span> Military campaign following 9/11 attacks

The war on terror, officially the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), is a global military campaign initiated by the United States following the September 11 attacks and is the most recent global conflict spanning multiple wars. The main targets of the campaign are militant Islamist movements like Al-Qaeda, Taliban and their allies. Other major targets included the Ba'athist regime in Iraq, which was deposed in an invasion in 2003, and various militant factions that fought during the ensuing insurgency. After its territorial expansion in 2014, the Islamic State militia has also emerged as a key adversary of the United States.

<i>FDDs Long War Journal</i> US news website on the war on terror

FDD's Long War Journal (LWJ) is an American news website, also described as a blog, which reports on the War on terror. The site is operated by Public Multimedia Incorporated (PMI), a non-profit media organization established in 2007. PMI is run by Paul Hanusz and Bill Roggio. Roggio is the managing editor of the journal and Thomas Joscelyn is senior editor. The site is a project of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, where both Roggio and Joscelyn are senior fellows.

Pakistan's role in the War on Terror is a widely discussed topic among policy-makers of various countries, political analysts and international delegates around the world. Pakistan has simultaneously received allegations of harbouring and aiding terrorists and commendation for its anti-terror efforts. Since 2001, the country has also hosted millions of Afghan refugees who fled the war in Afghanistan.

The War on Terror is the campaign launched by the United States of America in response to the September 11 attacks against organizations designated with terrorism. The campaign, whose stated objective was eliminating international terrorism, began in 2001. The following is a timeline of events linked to the War on Terror.

<i>The Terrorists of Iraq</i> 2014 book by Malcolm Nance

The Terrorists of Iraq: Inside the Strategy and Tactics of the Iraq Insurgency 2003–2014 is a nonfiction book about the Iraqi insurgency, written by U.S. Navy retired cryptology analyst Malcolm Nance. It was published by CRC Press in 2014. The book discusses the terrorist evolution of the Iraqi insurgency which led to the formation of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). Nance cites the 2003 Iraq war by the Bush Administration for causing regional instability. He criticizes Coalition Provisional Authority leader Paul Bremer. The book emphasizes lessons the U.S. neglected to learn from the Vietnam War, the Iraqi revolt against the British, and the South Lebanon conflict. Nance writes in favor of the Iran nuclear deal framework by the Obama Administration, saying it is in the interests of all parties involved.

<i>An End to al-Qaeda</i> Book by Malcolm Nance

An End to al-Qaeda: Destroying Bin Laden's Jihad and Restoring America's Honor is a non-fiction book about counterterrorism strategies towards al-Qaeda, written by U.S. Navy retired cryptology analyst Malcolm Nance. The book describes how the September 11 attacks changed the traditional Muslim community around the globe. Nance criticizes the approach of the George W. Bush administration, including the verbiage and public presentations used in the War on Terror. The author argues al-Qaeda is not part of Islam but is instead a dangerous religious cult. Nance writes the United States should commit to better education with a public relations campaign to encourage traditional believers in Islam around the world to denounce al-Qaeda.

During the Iraq War, occupying U.S. forces set up camps and converted existing prisons in Iraq to detain POWs, suspected terrorists, and insurgents who were opposed to the American occupation. While reports vary, from 2003 onwards U.S. troops stationed in Iraq detained more than 100,000 prisoners in the American-held detention complexes. Many of these detainments were later determined to be unlawful, and the treatment of the prisoners, inhumane. While the most prominent case of unlawful imprisonment, torture, and prisoner abuse occurred at Abu Ghraib prison, several other detainment centers were revealed to have operated in a similar fashion, most notably at Camp Bucca and Camp Cropper.

References

  1. "President Bush Addresses the Nation". georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov. Retrieved 2021-12-26.
  2. Global Message
  3. DefenseLink News Article: Iraq Part of Global War on Terrorism, Rumsfeld Says Archived September 29, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  4. Press Conference by the President, August 21, 2006
  5. D. Reese, C. Lewis, Stephen, Seth (2009). "Framing the War on Terror: The internalization of policy in the US press". Journalism. 10 (6): 777–797. doi:10.1177/1464884909344480 via Sage Journals.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. "President Bush Announces Major Combat Operations in Iraq Have Ended". 1 May 2003. Archived from the original on 2 June 2021.
  7. D. Reese, C. Lewis, Stephen, Seth (2009). "Framing the War on Terror: The internalization of policy in the US press". Journalism. 10 (6): 779. doi:10.1177/1464884909344480 via Sage Journals.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  8. "Presidential Letter". The White House George W. Bush. 21 March 2003. Archived from the original on 19 April 2023.
  9. D. Reese, C. Lewis, Stephen, Seth (2009). "Framing the War on Terror: The internalization of policy in the US press". Journalism. 10 (6): 777–797. doi:10.1177/1464884909344480 via Sage Journals.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. D. Reese, C. Lewis, Stephen, Seth (2009). "Framing the War on Terror: The internalization of policy in the US press". Journalism. 10 (6): 777–797. doi:10.1177/1464884909344480 via Sage Journals.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  11. D. Reese, C. Lewis, Stephen, Seth (2009). "Framing the War on Terror: The internalization of policy in the US press". Journalism. 10 (6): 777–797. doi:10.1177/1464884909344480 via Sage Journals.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. E. Sanger, David (22 September 2005). "Storm and Crisis: The President; Bush Compares Responses To Hurricane and Terrorism". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 6 May 2021.
  13. D. Reese, C. Lewis, Stephen, Seth (2009). "Framing the War on Terror: The internalization of policy in the US press". Journalism. 10 (6): 777–797. doi:10.1177/1464884909344480 via Sage Journals.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. D. Reese, C. Lewis, Stephen, Seth (2009). "Framing the War on Terror: The internalization of policy in the US press". Journalism. 10 (6): 777–797. doi:10.1177/1464884909344480 via Sage Journals.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. "Iraqi Support for Palestinian Terrorism". 2007-09-27. Archived from the original on 27 September 2007. Retrieved 2021-12-26.
  16. White House Oct 2002 press release
  17. Weisman, Jonathan. Iraq's Alleged Al-Qaeda Ties Were Disputed Before War. The Washington Post, September 9, 2006.
  18. Rohan Gunaratna, "The Post-Madrid Face of Al Qaeda", Washington Quarterly 27:3 (Summer 2004) p. 98.
  19. Sengupta, Kim (May 26, 2004). "Occupation Made World Less Safe, Pro-War Institute Says". Commondreams.org. Archived from the original on September 20, 2006.
  20. Ricks, Thomas E. (3 May 2007). Fiasco: The American Military Adventure in Iraq. Penguin.
  21. Priest, Dana (January 14, 2005). "Iraq New Terror Breeding Ground". The Washington Post .
  22. "DNI: Declassified NIE Key Judgments" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on September 30, 2006. (66.3  KiB)
  23. Mohammed M. Hafez, "A Case Study:The Mythology of Martyrdom in Iraq," eJournal USA (May 2007).
  24. al Jazeera English: Message to Iraqis October 2003
  25. Gerges, Fawaz A. (October 10, 2005). "The Iraq War: Planting the Seeds of Al Qaeda's Second Generation". Toward Freedom.
  26. Murphy, Dan (October 6, 2006). "How Al Qaeda views a long Iraq war". Christian Science Monitor.
  27. Survey Shows Skepticism About Iraq, Washington Post November 4, 2003
  28. Stocchetti, Matteo (2007). "The Politics of Fear: A Critical Inquiry into the Role of Violence in 21st Century Politics". In Hodges, Adam; Nilep, Chad (eds.). Discourse, War and Terrorism. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Vol. 24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. pp. 223–241. ISBN   978-90-272-2714-0.
  29. Record, Jeffrey (December 2003). "BOUNDING THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2005-10-06.
  30. Iraq Study Group Report Archived December 8, 2006, at the Wayback Machine
  31. 1 2 "Strategic Reset"
  32. Pew Research Center: Solid Majority Favors Congressional Troop Deadline, March 26, 2007
  33. Public Agenda: "Confidence in U.S. Foreign Policy Index" Archived May 21, 2007, at the Wayback Machine accessed April 28, 2007
  34. "Why the U.S. must withdraw from Iraq". Archived from the original on February 11, 2007. Retrieved July 30, 2007.
  35. Withdraw From Iraq
  36. CNN/Opinion Research Corporation Poll Jan. 19–21, 2007
  37. No more GWOT, House committee decrees - Army News, opinions, editorials, news from Iraq, photos, reports - Army Times
  38. "CNN Political Ticker - All politics, all the time - CNN.com Blogs". CNN. Retrieved May 5, 2010.
  39. "CNN Opinion Research Poll" (PDF). Opinion Research Corporation . June 26, 2007. Retrieved July 26, 2021.
  40. wcbstv.com - House Passes Troop Withdrawal Bill Archived July 13, 2007, at the Wayback Machine
  41. "House passes bill to bring troops home in '08 - CNN.com". CNN. July 13, 2007. Retrieved May 5, 2010.