Iusnaturalism

Last updated
Hugo Grotius, a Dutch jurist and scholar, is an iusnaturalist author, who maintained that rights are innate potestas of the human being and do not arise out of law. Michiel Jansz van Mierevelt - Hugo Grotius.jpg
Hugo Grotius, a Dutch jurist and scholar, is an iusnaturalist author, who maintained that rights are innate potestas of the human being and do not arise out of law.

Jusnaturalism or iusnaturalism is a theory of law, which holds that legal norms follow a human universal knowledge on justice and harmony of relations. [2] Thus, it views enacted laws that contradict such universal knowledge as unjust and illegitimate. [2] Modern theorists considered as iusnaturalists include Hugo Grotius, Immanuel Kant, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, and Franz von Zeiller, among others. [3]

Contents

This school of thought became popular during the Middle Ages and the Renaissance amid the attempt to identify "the relation, if any, of the ius gentium to natural law in the Aristotelian-Thomistic sense." [4] This issue had covered the role of God and the adequacy of reason without divine grace, among others particularly in the field of legal theory as it established the notion that natural law could exist without religion.

Concept

Iusnaturalism is associated with the notion of natural law proposed by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, Baruch Spinoza, and Samuel von Pufendorf. [5] It emerged from the view that emphasizes how the ideas of nature and divinity or reason are the sources of the validity of natural and positive laws. [5] It is also linked to the general theory of law, which has been viewed as one that has positivist character, aiming to be objective and non-normative. [6] For iusnaturalists, in order for a law to be accorded the status of legal or one that has a binding effect on people, it must be fair. [2]

Some scholars distinguish iusnaturalism from legal positivism but it is noted that both are concerned with the good law. [7] Iusnaturalism subordinates power to law as well as positive law to higher laws, giving it a more meaningful primordial metanarrative of natural law. [8] One of the fundamental notions of iusnaturalism is that man is free and no one has power over other men or moral power over another without a mutual act of will. [5] Failure to understand or recognize this would lead to conflict.

Variations

Iusnaturalism has different variations and these are based on religious and rational perspectives. Two of the most important are classical iusnaturalism and rationalist iusnaturalism. Classical iusnaturalism is associated with theorists such as Saint Thomas Aquinas, who maintained in his Treatise on Law that the universal laws of justice have a divine origin. [2] Aquinas' conceptualization was an offshoot of his development of Aristotle's practical reasoning. [9] David Hume opposed classical iusnaturalism with his "naturalistic fallacy" criticism. [9]

Rationalist or realist iusnaturalism emerged during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries as a consequence of the process of secularization, which affected the relationship between Christianity and international law. [10] Thinkers such as Grotius, Hobbes, and Kant maintain that the shared laws of justice are not revealed by God to humans but can be accessed by reason through an understanding of human nature. [2] This type of iusnaturalism integrates natural law and positive law as species of the same genus since they share one principle of common validity - political power. [5] There is also the case of the "iusnaturalist essentialism", which is a rationalist variant developed by Francisco Suarez. [9] The Spanish theologian maintained that the source of law is divine will rather than divine reasoning. [11] It was criticized for corrupting the structure of Aquinas' conceptualization. [9]

Moderate iusnaturalism is also another variant, which emphasizes how natural law exists together with positive law within a legal dualism that rejects all monisms as well as the so-called extreme iusnaturalism. [5] The extreme type holds that "natural law exists and all that exists is natural law". [5] It also recognizes that morality is one of the traits for characterizing what law is. [12]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jurisprudence</span> Theoretical study of law

Jurisprudence is the philosophy and theory of law. It is concerned primarily with what the law is and what it ought to be. That includes questions of how persons and social relations are understood in legal terms, and of the values in and of law. Work that is counted as jurisprudence is mostly philosophical, but it includes work that also belongs to other disciplines, such as sociology, history, politics and economics.

Natural law is a system of law based on a close observation of human nature, and based on values intrinsic to human nature that can be deduced and applied independently of positive law. According to the theory of law called jusnaturalism, all people have inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature, or reason." Natural law theory can also refer to "theories of ethics, theories of politics, theories of civil law, and theories of religious morality."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Political philosophy</span> Sub-discipline of philosophy and political science

Political philosophy or political theory is the philosophical study of government, addressing questions about the nature, scope, and legitimacy of public agents and institutions and the relationships between them. Its topics include politics, liberty, justice, property, rights, law, and the enforcement of laws by authority: what they are, if they are needed, what makes a government legitimate, what rights and freedoms it should protect, what form it should take, what the law is, and what duties citizens owe to a legitimate government, if any, and when it may be legitimately overthrown, if ever.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philosophy of law</span> Branch of philosophy examining the nature of law

Philosophy of law is a branch of philosophy that examines the nature of law and law's relationship to other systems of norms, especially ethics and political philosophy. It asks questions like "What is law?", "What are the criteria for legal validity?", and "What is the relationship between law and morality?" Philosophy of law and jurisprudence are often used interchangeably, though jurisprudence sometimes encompasses forms of reasoning that fit into economics or sociology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reason</span> Capacity for consciously making sense of things

Reason is the capacity of applying logic consciously by drawing conclusions from new or existing information, with the aim of seeking the truth. It is closely associated with such characteristically human activities as philosophy, science, language, mathematics, and art, and is normally considered to be a distinguishing ability possessed by humans. Reason is sometimes referred to as rationality.

Moral absolutism is an ethical view that some actions are intrinsically right or wrong. Stealing, for instance, might be considered to be always immoral, even if done for the well-being of others, and even if it does in the end promote such a good. Moral absolutism stands in contrast to other categories of normative ethical theories such as consequentialism, which holds that the morality of an act depends on the consequences or the context of the act.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hugo Grotius</span> Dutch philosopher and jurist

Hugo Grotius, also known as Huig de Groot and Hugo de Groot, was a Dutch humanist, diplomat, lawyer, theologian, jurist, statesman, poet and playwright. A teenage prodigy, he was born in Delft and studied at Leiden University. He was imprisoned in Loevestein Castle for his involvement in the intra-Calvinist disputes of the Dutch Republic, but escaped hidden in a chest of books that was transported to Gorinchem. Grotius wrote most of his major works in exile in France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Divine command theory</span> Meta-ethical theory of morality

Divine command theory is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God. The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by God's commands and that for a person to be moral he is to follow God's commands. Followers of both monotheistic and polytheistic religions in ancient and modern times have often accepted the importance of God's commands in establishing morality.

Some philosophers distinguish two types of rights, natural rights and legal rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euthyphro dilemma</span> Ethical problem on the origin of morality posed by Socrates

The Euthyphro dilemma is found in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro, in which Socrates asks Euthyphro, "Is the pious loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (10a)

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francisco Suárez</span> Spanish priest, philosopher and theologian

Francisco Suárez, was a Spanish Jesuit priest, philosopher and theologian, one of the leading figures of the School of Salamanca movement, and generally regarded among the greatest scholastics after Thomas Aquinas. His work is considered a turning point in the history of second scholasticism, marking the transition from its Renaissance to its Baroque phases. According to Christopher Shields and Daniel Schwartz, "figures as distinct from one another in place, time, and philosophical orientation as Leibniz, Grotius, Pufendorf, Schopenhauer and Heidegger, all found reason to cite him as a source of inspiration and influence."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Positive law</span> Laws that oblige or specify an action

Positive laws are human-made laws that oblige or specify an action. Positive law also describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or group. Etymologically, the name derives from the verb to posit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Finnis</span>

John Mitchell Finnis,, is an Australian legal philosopher and jurist specializing in jurisprudence and the philosophy of law. He is an original interpreter of Aristotle and Aquinas, and counts Germain Grisez as a major influence and collaborator. He has made contributions to the philosophy of knowledge, metaphysics, and moral philosophy.

Legal naturalism is a term coined by Olufemi Taiwo to describe a current in the social philosophy of Karl Marx which can be interpreted as one of natural law. Taiwo considered it the manifestation of Natural Law in a dialectical materialist context. The concept recognizes the existence of legal priorities or principles, which form an intrinsic part of an economic system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kantian ethics</span> Ethical theory of Immanuel Kant

Kantian ethics refers to a deontological ethical theory developed by German philosopher Immanuel Kant that is based on the notion that: "It is impossible to think of anything at all in the world, or indeed even beyond it, that could be considered good without limitation except a good will." The theory was developed in the context of Enlightenment rationalism. It states that an action can only be moral if (i) it is motivated by a sense of duty and (ii) its maxim may be rationally willed a universal, objective law.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Common sense</span> Sound practical judgement in everyday matters

Common sense is sound, practical judgment concerning everyday matters, or a basic ability to perceive, understand, and judge in a manner that is shared by nearly all people.

<i>Natural Law and Natural Rights</i> 1980 book by John Finnis

Natural Law and Natural Rights is a book by John Finnis first published by Oxford University Press, as part of the Clarendon Law Series. Finnis develops a philosophy of Law in the tradition of Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas – Natural Law. His presentation and defence of Natural Law can be explored from three perspectives. First, polemical, by contradistinction with other philosophies of Law. Second, through its particular methodology, based on practical reasoning. Third, through its substantive content in the form of basic human goods. This article offers a brief overview of each of these perspectives. In addition, his 2011 edition included an extensive Postcript, which is briefly discussed in the 4th Section. A brief appraisal of the book is included in the final section.

This is an index of articles in jurisprudence.

Ethics is the branch of philosophy that examines right and wrong moral behavior, moral concepts and moral language. Ethics or moral philosophy is a branch of philosophy that "involves systematizing, defending, and recommending concepts of right and wrong behavior". The field of ethics, along with aesthetics, concerns matters of value, and thus comprises the branch of philosophy called axiology.

Man-made law is law that is made by humans, usually considered in opposition to concepts like natural law or divine law.

References

  1. Falcon y Tella, María José (2010). A Three-Dimensional Theory of Law. Leiden: BRILL. p. 326. ISBN   9789004179325.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 Vallejo, Catalina (2012). Plurality of Peaces in Legal Action: Analyzing Constitutional Objections to Military Services in Colombia. Berlin: LIT Verlag. p. 62. ISBN   9783643902825.
  3. Hoevel, Carlos (2013). The Economy of Recognition: Person, Market and Society in Antonio Rosmini. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 100. ISBN   9789400760578.
  4. Schaeffer, John (2019-03-20). Giambattista Vico on Natural Law: Rhetoric, Religion and Sensus Communis. Routledge. ISBN   9780429575082.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tella, María José Falcon y (2010). A Three-Dimensional Theory of Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. pp. 204, 326. ISBN   9789004179325.
  6. Husa, Jaakko; Hoecke, Mark Van (2013). Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning. Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing. p. 235. ISBN   9781849464413.
  7. TAMMELO, LYNDALL LORNA (1981). "From Iusnaturalism to Eunomics via Conativist Ethics". ARSP: Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. 67 (1): 92–99. ISSN   0001-2343. JSTOR   23679420.
  8. Ferreira da Cunha, Paulo (2013). Rethinking Natural Law. Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 11. ISBN   9783642326592.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Martínez, Alejandro Néstor García; Šilar, Mario; Torralba, José M. (2008). Natural Law: Historical, Systematic and Juridical Approaches. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. p. 427. ISBN   1-84718-643-2.
  10. de la Rasilla del Moral, Ignacio (2017). In the Shadow of Vitoria: A History of International Law in Spain (1770–1953). Leiden: BRILL Nijhoff. p. 106. ISBN   9789004343221.
  11. "natural law | Definition, Theory, Ethics, Examples, & Facts | Britannica". www.britannica.com. Retrieved 2022-06-14.
  12. Cortina, Adela (2000). "Legislation, Law and Ethics". Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 3: 3–7. doi:10.1023/A:1009926924798. S2CID   146136447 via Kluwer Academic Publishers.