Joint Strike Fighter program

Last updated

Joint Strike Fighter (JSF)
X-32 X-35 Edwards.jpg
Boeing X-32 (left) and Lockheed Martin X-35 (right) JSF demonstrators.
General information
Project forStrike Fighter
Issued byMultiple services
Prototypes Boeing X-32
Lockheed Martin X-35
History
OutcomeX-35 selected for production as F-35 Lightning II
Predecessors Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter (CALF)
Joint Advanced Strike Technology

Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) is a development and acquisition program intended to replace a wide range of existing fighter, strike, and ground attack aircraft for the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy, Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, Denmark, Norway, and formerly Turkey. [1] After a competition between the Boeing X-32 and the Lockheed Martin X-35, the latter aircraft was selected for a contract award and developed into the F-35 Lightning II, which will replace various tactical aircraft, including the US F-16, A-10, F/A-18A-D, AV-8B, EA-6B and British Harrier GR7, GR9s and Tornado GR4. The projected average annual cost of the program is $12.5 billion with an estimated program life-cycle cost of $1.1 trillion. [2]

Contents

Project formation

The JSF program was the result of the merger of the Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter (CALF) and Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) projects. [3] [4] The merged project continued under the JAST name until the engineering, manufacturing and development (EMD) phase, during which the project became the Joint Strike Fighter. [5]

The CALF was a DARPA program to develop a STOVL strike fighter (SSF) for the United States Marine Corps and replacement for the F-16 Fighting Falcon. The United States Air Force passed over the F-16 Agile Falcon in the late 1980s, essentially an enlarged F-16, and continued to mull other designs. In 1992, the Marine Corps and Air Force agreed to jointly develop the Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter, also known as Advanced Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing (ASTOVL). CALF project was chosen after Paul Bevilaqua persuaded [6] the Air Force that his team's concept [7] (if stripped of its lift system) had potential as a complement to the F-22 Raptor. [6]

The Joint Advanced Strike Technology (JAST) program was created in 1993, implementing one of the recommendations of a United States Department of Defense (DoD) "Bottom-Up Review to include the United States Navy in the Common Strike Fighter program." [8] The review also led the Pentagon to continue the F-22 Raptor and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet programs, cancel the Multi-Role Fighter (MRF) and the A/F-X programs, and curtail F-16 and F/A-18C/D procurement. The JAST program office was established on 27 January 1994 to develop aircraft, weapons, and sensor technology with the aim of replacing several disparate US and UK aircraft with a single family of aircraft; the majority of those produced would replace F-16s. Merrill McPeak, former Chief of Staff of the United States Air Force, has complained that Defense Secretary Les Aspin's decision to force all three services to use a single airframe greatly increased the costs and difficulty of the project. [9]

In November 1995, the United Kingdom signed a memorandum of understanding to become a formal partner, and agreed to pay $200 million, or 10% of the concept demonstration phase. [5]

In 1997, Canada's Department of National Defence signed on to the Concept Demonstration phase with an investment of US$10 million. This investment allowed Canada to participate in the extensive and rigorous competitive process where Boeing and Lockheed Martin developed and competed their prototype aircraft. [10]

JSF competition

X-32B at Patuxent River Naval Air Museum Boeing X-32B Patuxent.jpg
X-32B at Patuxent River Naval Air Museum
X-35C performing a flight test at Edwards Air Force Base Lockheed F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.jpg
X-35C performing a flight test at Edwards Air Force Base

Studies supporting JAST/JSF started in 1993 and led to STOVL submissions to the DOD by McDonnell Douglas, Northrop, Lockheed and Boeing: [11]

  1. McDonnell Douglas proposed an aircraft powered by a reheated turbofan, with a remote gas-driven fan to augment lift in the STOVL mode. Later, General Electric did a ground demonstration of this engine configuration.
  2. The Northrop aircraft featured an auxiliary lift engine augmenting the dry thrust from a reheated turbofan fitted with a pair of thrust-vectoring nozzles.
  3. The Lockheed aircraft concept used a reheated turbofan with thrust augmentation from a remote shaft-driven lift fan. This engine configuration was to lead eventually to the F135-PW-600 which powers the F-35B JSF production aircraft.
  4. Boeing decided against thrust augmentation. They proposed an aircraft powered by a reheated turbofan that could be reconfigured (in the STOVL mode) into a direct lift engine with a pair of thrust-vectoring nozzles located near the aircraft center-of-gravity. This led to the F119-PW-614S which powered the X-32B JSF demonstrator.

Two contracts to develop prototypes were awarded on November 16, 1996, one each to Lockheed Martin and Boeing. [12] Each firm would produce two aircraft to demonstrate conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL), carrier takeoff and landing (CV version), and short takeoff and vertical landing (STOVL). McDonnell Douglas' bid was rejected in part due to the complexity of its design. [13] Lockheed Martin and Boeing were each given $750 million to develop their concept demonstrators and the definition of the Preferred Weapon System Concept (PWSC). The aim of this funding limit was to prevent one or both contractors from bankrupting themselves in an effort to win such an important contract. [4]

Also in 1996, the UK Ministry of Defence launched the Future Carrier Borne Aircraft project. This program sought a replacement for the Sea Harrier (and later the Harrier GR7); the Joint Strike Fighter was selected in January 2001.

During concept definition, two Lockheed Martin airplanes were flight-tested: the X-35A (which was later converted into the X-35B), and the larger-winged X-35C. [14] Arguably the most persuasive demonstration of the X-35's capability was the final qualifying Joint Strike Fighter flight trials, in which the X-35B STOVL aircraft took off in less than 500 feet (150 m), went supersonic, and landed vertically – a feat that Boeing's entry was unable to achieve. [15]

Outcome

The contract for System Development and Demonstration (SDD) was awarded on 26 October 2001 to Lockheed Martin, [16] whose X-35 beat the Boeing X-32. One of the main reasons for this choice appears to have been the method of achieving STOVL flight, with the Department of Defense judging that the higher performance lift fan system was worth the extra risk. When near to the ground, the Boeing X-32 suffered from the problem of hot air from the exhaust circulating back to the main engine, which caused the thrust to weaken and the engine to overheat. [15]

The United States Department of Defense officials and William Bach, the UK Minister of Defence Procurement, said the X-35 consistently outperformed the X-32, although both met or exceeded requirements. [15] The development of the JSF was jointly funded by the United States, United Kingdom, Italy, the Netherlands, Canada, Turkey, Australia, Norway and Denmark. In July 2019 United States removed Turkey from the Joint Strike Fighter program, following the country's acquisition of the Russian S-400 missile system. Turkey had planned to buy 100 F-35 Lightning II jets. [17]

Lockheed Martin's X-35 would become the basis of the F-35 Lightning II, currently in production. On April 6, 2009, US Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced that the US would buy a total of 2,443 JSFs. [18]

Program issues

Alleged Chinese espionage

In April 2009, the Wall Street Journal reported that computer spies, allegedly Chinese but acknowledged to be from uncertain sources, had penetrated the database and acquired terabytes of secret information about the fighter, possibly compromising its future effectiveness. [19] [20]

The state-run Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC) has been alleged to incorporate the data into China's Chengdu J-20 and Shenyang FC-31 fighters. [21] [22] [23]

Cost overruns

On February 1, 2010, Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates announced that, due to delays and other problems with the JSF development program, he was removing Major General David R. Heinz from command of the program and would withhold $614 million in bonuses from Lockheed Martin. [24] On February 16, 2010, Deputy Defense Secretary Bill Lynn announced that the program will be delayed one year. [25] According to some estimates, overruns could increase the program's total costs to $388 billion, a 50% increase from the initial price tag. [26] Many of the program's financial and technical complications result from the Marine version of the JSF, capable of vertical take-offs and landings. [26]

On 11 March 2010, United States Senate Committee on Armed Services investigated the progress of the JSF program in a meeting with Pentagon officials, emphasizing cost due to the risk of a Nunn-McCurdy process. [27] According to the Government Accountability Office, F-35A cost has risen from $50m in 2002, via $69m in 2007 to $74m in 2010, all measured in 2002 dollars. [27]

Canada reviewed their commitment to the project in December 2012, due to the cost overruns. The decision was made following a report by auditing firm KPMG that showed that Canada's purchase would cost C$45bn over 42 years. Rona Ambrose, Canada's public works minister said: “We have hit the reset button and are taking the time to do a complete assessment of all available aircraft.” [28] Defence Minister Peter MacKay announced Canada's plan to buy the F-35 in 2010 saying that the purchase price was $9 billion, but did not provide operating cost estimates. During an election campaign in 2011, the Conservatives declared that the total cost over 20 years would be $16 billion. [29] On 19 October 2015 the Liberal Party of Canada under Justin Trudeau won a majority in part on a campaign promise to not purchase the F-35, but instead "one of the many, lower-priced options that better match Canada's defence needs". [30] [31]

Performance concerns

Concerns about the F-35's performance have resulted partially from reports of simulations by RAND Corporation in which three regiments of Chinese Sukhoi Su-27 fighters defeat six F-22s by denying tanker refueling. [32]

As a result of these media reports, then Australian defence minister Joel Fitzgibbon requested a formal briefing from the Australian Department of Defence on the simulation. This briefing stated that the reports of the simulation were inaccurate and that it did not compare the F-35's performance against that of other aircraft. [33] [34]

Andrew Hoehn, Director of RAND Project Air Force, made the following statement: "Recently, articles have appeared in the Australian press with assertions regarding a war game in which analysts from the RAND Corporation were involved. Those reports are not accurate. RAND did not present any analysis at the war game relating to the performance of the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, nor did the game attempt detailed adjudication of air-to-air combat. Neither the game nor the assessments by RAND in support of the game undertook any comparison of the fighting qualities of particular fighter aircraft." [35]

Furthermore, Maj. Richard Koch, chief of USAF Air Combat Command's advanced air dominance branch is reported to have said that "I wake up in a cold sweat at the thought of the F-35 going in with only two air-dominance weapons" with an Aviation Week article casting an extremely skeptical eye over the (USAF) source of claims that the F-35 would be "400% more effective" than projected opponents. [36]

The experience of the JSF program has led to a more conservative and open-ended Future Vertical Lift program. [37]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II</span> American stealth multirole combat aircraft

The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is an American family of single-seat, single-engine, all-weather stealth multirole combat aircraft that is intended to perform both air superiority and strike missions. It is also able to provide electronic warfare and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance capabilities. Lockheed Martin is the prime F-35 contractor, with principal partners Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems. The aircraft has three main variants: the conventional takeoff and landing (CTOL) F-35A, the short take-off and vertical-landing (STOVL) F-35B, and the carrier-based (CV/CATOBAR) F-35C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">STOVL</span> Short takeoff and landing aircraft

A short take-off and vertical landing aircraft is a fixed-wing aircraft that is able to take off from a short runway and land vertically. The formal NATO definition is:

A Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing aircraft is a fixed-wing aircraft capable of clearing a 15 m obstacle within 450 m of commencing take-off run, and capable of landing vertically.

A vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft is one that can take off and land vertically without relying on a runway. This classification can include a variety of types of aircraft including helicopters as well as thrust-vectoring fixed-wing aircraft and other hybrid aircraft with powered rotors such as cyclogyros/cyclocopters and gyrodynes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strike fighter</span> Multirole combat aircraft

In current military parlance, a strike fighter is a multirole combat aircraft designed to operate both as an attack aircraft and as an air superiority fighter. As a category, it is distinct from fighter-bombers. It is closely related to the concept of interdictor aircraft, but it puts more emphasis on aerial combat capabilities as a multirole combat aircraft. Examples of contemporary American strike fighters are the McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle, Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet, and Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harrier jump jet</span> Multirole combat aircraft family by Hawker Siddeley, later British Aerospace

The Harrier, informally referred to as the Harrier jump jet, is a family of jet-powered attack aircraft capable of vertical/short takeoff and landing operations (V/STOL). Named after a bird of prey, it was originally developed by British manufacturer Hawker Siddeley in the 1960s. The Harrier emerged as the only truly successful V/STOL design of the many attempted during that era. It was conceived to operate from improvised bases, such as car parks or forest clearings, without requiring large and vulnerable air bases. Later, the design was adapted for use from aircraft carriers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">V/STOL</span> Aircraft takeoff and landing class

A vertical and/or short take-off and landing (V/STOL) aircraft is an airplane able to take-off or land vertically or on short runways. Vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft are a subset of V/STOL craft that do not require runways at all. Generally, a V/STOL aircraft needs to be able to hover. Helicopters are not considered under the V/STOL classification as the classification is only used for aeroplanes, aircraft that achieve lift (force) in forward flight by planing the air, thereby achieving speed and fuel efficiency that is typically greater than the capability of helicopters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed Martin X-35</span> Concept demonstrator aircraft for Joint Strike Fighter program

The Lockheed Martin X-35 is a concept demonstrator aircraft (CDA) developed by Lockheed Martin for the Joint Strike Fighter program. The X-35 was declared the winner over the competing Boeing X-32 and a developed, armed version went on to enter production in the early 21st century as the F-35 Lightning II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136</span> Never completed engine for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II

The General Electric/Rolls-Royce F136 was an advanced turbofan engine being developed by General Electric and Rolls-Royce plc for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II. The two companies stopped work on the project in December 2011 after failing to gather Pentagon support for further development.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing X-32</span> Multirole combat aircraft prototype by Boeing

The Boeing X-32 is a concept demonstrator aircraft that was designed for the Joint Strike Fighter competition. It lost to the Lockheed Martin X-35 demonstrator, which was further developed into the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pratt & Whitney F119</span> American low-bypass turbofan engine for the F-22 Raptor

The Pratt & Whitney F119, company designation PW5000, is an afterburning turbofan engine developed by Pratt & Whitney for the Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) program, which resulted in the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor. The engine delivers thrust in the 35,000 lbf (156 kN) class and was designed for sustained supersonic flight without afterburners, or supercruise. Delivering almost 22% more thrust with 40% fewer parts than its F100 predecessor, the F119 allows the F-22 to achieve supercruise speeds of up to Mach 1.8. The F119's nozzles incorporate thrust vectoring that enable them to direct the engine thrust ±20° in the pitch axis to give the F-22 enhanced maneuverability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pratt & Whitney F135</span> Afterburning turbofan aircraft engine

The Pratt & Whitney F135 is an afterburning turbofan developed for the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, a single-engine strike fighter. It has two variants; a Conventional Take-Off and Landing (CTOL) variant used in the F-35A and F-35C, and a two-cycle Short Take-Off Vertical Landing (STOVL) variant used in the F-35B that includes a forward lift fan. The first production engines were delivered in 2009.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing F/A-18E/F Super Hornet</span> Series of carrier-based multirole combat aircraft

The Boeing F/A-18E and F/A-18F Super Hornet are a series of American supersonic twin-engine, carrier-capable, multirole fighter aircraft derived from the McDonnell Douglas F/A-18 Hornet, in service with the armed forces of the U.S., Australia, and Kuwait. The F/A-18E single-seat and F/A-18F tandem-seat variants are larger and more advanced versions of the F/A-18C and D Hornet, respectively.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joint Combat Aircraft</span> F-35 aircraft in UK service

The Joint Combat Aircraft (JCA) is the official designation of the United Kingdom Ministry of Defence used for the F-35 Lightning II. The F-35, developed from the X-35, is the result of the Joint Strike Fighter program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce LiftSystem</span> Aircraft propulsion system

The Rolls-Royce LiftSystem, together with the F135 engine, is an aircraft propulsion system designed for use in the STOVL variant of the F-35 Lightning II. The complete system, known as the Integrated Lift Fan Propulsion System (ILFPS), was awarded the Collier Trophy in 2001.

Paul Michael Bevilaqua is an aeronautics engineer at Lockheed Martin in California. In 1990, he invented the lift fan for the Joint Strike Fighter F-35B along with fellow Skunk Works engineer, Paul Shumpert.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement</span> Fighter procurement

Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II procurement is the planned selection and purchase of the Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II, also known as the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) by various countries.

The British Aerospace P.125 was a British supersonic STOVL multirole combat aircraft being developed in the 1980s. The project was cancelled in the 1990s. The existence of the project was revealed by BAE Systems in 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shipborne rolling vertical landing</span> Method of aircraft landing

Shipborne rolling vertical landing (SRVL) is a method used to land a V/STOL aircraft that uses both the vertical thrust from the jet engine and lift from the wings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II development</span> Type of aircraft

Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II development started in 1995 with the origins of the Joint Strike Fighter program and culminated in the completion of operational testing and start of full-rate production in 2021. The X-35 first flew on 24 October 2000 and the F-35A on 15 December 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Art Tomassetti</span> US Marine Corps officer and test pilot

Arthur Tomassetti is a retired United States Marine Corps colonel, combat veteran, and test pilot who is notable for his work on the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) and F‑35 Lightning II. During twenty-one years on the programs, he worked in key roles developing pilot interfaces, testing aircraft capabilities, fielding aircraft to operational units, and establishing the F-35 training organization that certifies US and international pilots and maintainers.

References

  1. ↑ Mehta, Aaron (17 July 2019). "Turkey officially kicked out of F-35 program, costing US half a billion dollars". Defense News. Retrieved 6 June 2021.
  2. ↑ "Joint Strike Fighter – DOD Actions Needed to Further Enhance Restructuring and Address Affordability Risks" (PDF). United States Government Accountability Office. Retrieved 1 August 2012.
  3. ↑ A history of the Joint Strike Fighter Program Archived 2010-12-30 at the Wayback Machine , Martin-Baker. Retrieved April 2011
  4. 1 2 Nicholls, Mark (August 2000). "JSF: The Ultimate Prize". Air Forces Monthly . Key Publishing: 32–38.
  5. 1 2 "US, UK sign JAST agreement". Aerospace Daily. McGraw-Hill. 25 November 1995. p. 451.
  6. 1 2 Wilson, George C. "The engine that could Archived 2013-10-19 at the Wayback Machine " GovExec, January 22, 2002. Retrieved December 2009. Archived on 19 October 2013.
  7. ↑ "Propulsion system for a vertical and short takeoff and landing aircraft" Archived 2012-02-25 at the Wayback Machine , United States Patent 5209428
  8. ↑ Bolkcom, Christopher. JSF: Background, Status, and Issues page CRS-2, dtic.mil, 16 June 2003. Retrieved: 18 September 2010.
  9. ↑ "Prices soar, enthusiasm dives for F-35 Lightning."
  10. ↑ Archived 2011-02-11 at the Wayback Machine . "Government of Canada" 16 July 2010 Retrieved: 26 July 2010
  11. ↑ "1995 | 0834 | Flight Archive". www.flightglobal.com. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016.
  12. ↑ Bolkcom, Christopher (17 February 2009). "F-35 Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) Program: Background, Status, and Issues". apps.dtic.mil. Defense Technical Information Center. Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved 3 February 2019.
  13. ↑ Fulghum, David; Morrocco, John (25 November 1996). "Final JSF Competition Offers No Sure Bets". Aviation Week and Space Technology. McGraw-Hill. p. 20.
  14. ↑ "Joint Strike Fighter official site – History page". Archived from the original on 15 July 2019. Retrieved 21 August 2007.
  15. 1 2 3 PBS: Nova transcript "X-planes"
  16. ↑ Bolkcom, Christopher. JSF: Background, Status, and Issues page CRS-4, dtic.mil, 16 June 2003. Retrieved: 18 September 2010.
  17. ↑ "US removes Turkey from F-35 fighter jet programme". BBC News. 17 July 2019.
  18. ↑ Gates, Dominic, "Aerospace Giant 'Hit Harder' Than Peers", Seattle Times , April 7, 2009, p. 1.
  19. ↑ Gorman, Siobahn; Cole, August; Dreazen, Yochi (21 April 2009). "Computer Spies Breach Fighter-Jet Project" . The Wall Street Journal . Evan Perez contributed to this article. Dow Jones & Company. Archived from the original on 15 January 2015.
  20. ↑ Mount, Mike (21 April 2009). "Hackers stole data on Pentagon's newest fighter jet". CNN . Eric Marrapodi contributed to this report. Archived from the original on 24 April 2009 – via cnn.com.
  21. ↑ "Stolen F-35 secrets now showing up in China's stealth fighter". Fox News. 20 December 2015 [First published March 13, 2014].
  22. ↑ "New Snowden Documents Reveal Chinese Behind F-35 Hack". The Diplomat. 27 January 2015.
  23. ↑ "America says China's fifth-generation jet fighter J-31 stolen from its F-35". The Economic Times. 13 November 2015.
  24. ↑ Whitlock, Craig, "Gates To Major General: You're Fired", Washington Post , February 2, 2010, p. 4.
  25. ↑ Reed, John, "Pentagon Official Confirms 1-Year Delay For JSF", DefenseNews.com, February 16, 2010.
  26. 1 2 Shachtman, Noah. "The Air Force Needs a Serious Upgrade" Archived 2010-10-08 at the Wayback Machine , The Brookings Institution, 15 July 2010.
  27. 1 2 JSF faces US Senate grilling, australianaviation.com.au 12 March 2010.
  28. ↑ "Canada puts JSF on ice". Financial Times. 13 December 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2013.
  29. ↑ "Canada Reviews Plans to Buy F-35 Fighter Jets". New York Times. 12 December 2012. Retrieved 18 August 2013.
  30. ↑ "Justin Trudeau pledges 'real change' as Liberals leap ahead to majority government". cbc.ca. 20 October 2015. Retrieved 20 October 2015.
  31. ↑ Liberal Party of Canada (5 October 2015). "A New Plan For a Strong Middle Class" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 14 October 2015. Retrieved 5 October 2015.
  32. ↑ Trimble, Stephen. "US defence policy – and F-35 – under attack." Flight International, Reed Business Information, 15 October 2008.
  33. ↑ "Fighter criticism 'unfair' and 'misrepresented'." ABC News, 25 September 2008. Retrieved: 30 October 2008.
  34. ↑ Wolf, Jim. "Air Force chief links F-35 fighter jet to China." reuters.com, 19 September 2007. Retrieved: 3 July 2010.
  35. ↑ Hoehn, Andrew. "Statement Regarding Media Coverage of F-35 Joint Strike Fighter." RAND, 12 October 2010. Retrieved 17 May 2012.
  36. ↑ Sweetman, Bill. "JSF Leaders Back In The Fight." aviationweek.com, 22 September 2008. Retrieved: 3 July 2010.
  37. ↑ Sydney J. Freedberg Jr. "Future Vertical Lift: One Program Or Many?" Breaking Defense, 5 June 2014. Accessed: 22 June 2014. Archived on 6 June 2014.
External images
Official JSF program videos
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.