Judiciary of Mauritius

Last updated

The Judiciary of Mauritius is responsible for the administration of justice in Mauritius and has as mission to maintain an independent and competent judicial system which upholds the rule of law, safeguards the rights and freedom of the individual and commands domestic and international confidence. The Constitution provides for the institution of an independent judiciary which is based on the concept of separation of powers. Mauritius has a single-structured judicial system consisting of two parts, the Supreme Court and the Subordinate Courts. The Subordinate Courts consist of the Court of Rodrigues, the Intermediate Court, the Industrial Court, the District Courts, the Bail and Remand Court, the Criminal and Mediation Court and the Commercial Court. The Chief Justice is head of the judiciary. The Constitution of Mauritius is the supreme legal document of the country. The final appeal from decisions of the Court of Appeal of Mauritius to the Judicial Committee of the Privy council in London as provided for under the Constitution of Mauritius. [1] [2]

Contents

As of 2014, a total of 8,594 cases were pending before the Supreme Court of Mauritius. The number of cases before the case decreased by 1 per cent in 2014 compared to 2013, while the number of cases disposed increased by 32 per cent. As much of 42 per cent of cases in district courts were from urban areas, while the Division III of District Court of Port Louis disposed most number of cases in 2014 among all district courts.

History

Supreme Court building in Port Louis Port Louis, Supreme Court.jpg
Supreme Court building in Port Louis

The modern system of law in Mauritius is an amalgamation of French civil law and common law, while the civil and criminal proceedings are modelled based on British practice. The civil aspects governing the Mauritian Legal System are namely; contract law, société, civil rights, property law and the civil procedure. [3] Supreme Court is established as the highest court of justice and lower courts of namely, the Criminal Court of Procedure and the Civil Court of Procedure. The official language used in the Supreme Court is English. [4]

In 1507 Portuguese sailors came to the uninhabited island and established a visiting base. Diogo Fernandes Pereira, a Portuguese navigator, was the first European known to land in Mauritius and named the island "Ilha do Cirne". The Portuguese did not stay long and did not establish any formal system of Judicial administration. [5] In 1598 a Dutch squadron under Admiral Wybrand Van Warwyck landed at Grand Port and named the island "Mauritius" after Prince Maurice van Nassau of the Dutch Republic, the ruler of his country. [6] France, which already controlled neighbouring Île Bourbon (now Réunion), took control of Mauritius in 1715 and renamed it Isle de France. [5] From 1767 to 1810, except for a brief period during the French Revolution when the inhabitants set up a government virtually independent of France, the island was controlled by officials appointed by the French Government. A Penal Code was published in 1791 and adopted by the Colonial Assembly in 1793, while a separate civil code was promulgated on 3 September 1807. The Supreme Court was established as a supreme body composed of the Prime minister, President, three judges, four clerks and a government commissioner where appeal from neighbouring Seychelles was also allowed. [7] [8]

Despite winning the Battle of Grand Port, the only French naval victory over the British during these wars, the French could not prevent the British from landing at Cap Malheureux during 1810. They formally surrendered the island on the fifth day of the invasion, 3 December 1810, [9] on terms allowing settlers to keep their land and property and to use the French language and law of France in criminal and civil matters. Under British rule, the island's name reverted to Mauritius. [5] The British rule established a two tier system where the justice can have a higher appeal in Majesty's council. By 1851, after many changes in the judicial administration laws, Supreme Court was established as the body of appeal, making it again a single tiered jurisdiction. A bail court was later established with a judge of the Supreme court with a right to appeal, making it a two-tiered system. [10]

The island of Rodrigues has enjoyed higher autonomy as it maintains a separate regional assembly and a court of its own. [11]

Structure

Commercial Court Commercial Court (4721902226).jpg
Commercial Court

The Judiciary of Mauritius is considered one of the three principal bodies of Mauritian democracy along with the legal and executive. It is an independent and competent judicial system which upholds the rule of law, safeguards the rights and freedom of the individual and commands domestic and international confidence. The Constitution provides for the institution of an independent judiciary which is based on the concept of separation of powers. Mauritius has a single-structured judicial system consisting of two parts, the Supreme Court and the Subordinate Courts. The Subordinate Courts consist of the Court of Rodrigues, the Intermediate Court, the Industrial Court, the District Courts, the Bail and Remand Court, the Criminal and Mediation Court and the Commercial Court. The Chief Justice is head of the judiciary. The Constitution of Mauritius is the supreme legal document of the country. The final appeal from decisions of the Court of Appeal of Mauritius to the Judicial Committee of the Privy council in London as provided for under the Constitution of Mauritius. [12]

Statistics

As of 2014, a total of 8,594 cases were pending before the Supreme Court of Mauritius. The number of cases before the case decreased by 1 per cent in 2014 compared to 2013, while the number of cases disposed increased by 32 per cent. The number of criminal offences convicted before the Criminal Division of the Supreme Court increased by 8 per cent in 2014. There were three sodomy and twelve convictions in drug related cases in 2014. [13] The number of cases reduced in Intermediate courts by 5 per cent on account of decrease of criminal cases by 21 per cent and increase in number of civil cases by 5 per cent. [14] The number of cases in Industrial court increased by 9 per cent as there was 39 per cent increase in criminal cases and a marginal increase in civil cases. [15] As much of 42 per cent of cases in district courts were from urban areas, while the Division III of District Court of Port Louis disposed most number of cases in 2014 among all district courts. [16]

Number of cases before Supreme Court of Mauritius
Type2007 [17] 2008 [17] 2009 [17] 2010 [17] 2011 [18] 2012 [18] 2013 [18] 2014 [18]
Supreme court - cases pending at the beginning of the year10,85811,84612,7049,3809,4399,1458,74410,023
Supreme court - cases lodged7,5897,2447,6129,2349,1619,2539,6179,483
Supreme court - cases disposed6,6015,9208,0628,7818,4598,4688,33810,912
Supreme court - cases outstanding at the end of the year11,84612,6949,3809,4399,1458,93310,0238,594
Intermediate court - cases pending at the beginning of the year4,6994,0143,8364,2554,8303,8875,9976,413
Intermediate court - cases lodged3,5373,4653,6384,1284,0653,8373,9243,341
Intermediate court - cases disposed3,9103,6433,2193,5533,4423,2363,5083,332
Intermediate court - cases outstanding at the end of the year4,3263,8364,2554,8303,8874,8396,4136,422
Industrial court - cases pending at the beginning of the year9446614235328168351,1491,155
Industrial court - cases lodged1,1738301,0721,2721,0951,1811,1831,215
Industrial court - cases disposed1,4561,0689631,1191,0781,0021,1771,280
Industrial court - cases outstanding at the end of the year6614235328168351,1491,1551,090
District court - cases pending at the beginning of the year50,58335,89031,03228,63024,39625,16332,63434,913
District court - cases lodged123,595107,745111,818113,977110,162123,226128,529114,521
District court - cases disposed132,886106,438106,147110,128107,527110,849128,720119,485
District court - cases outstanding at the end of the year35,83631,03228,63024,39625,16332,63432,44329,949
Court of Rodrigues - cases pending at the beginning of the year5636012,0191,008321306572305
Court of Rodrigues - cases lodged1,7413,2773,2132,3232,1625,2443,9414,863
Court of Rodrigues - cases disposed1,7031,8594,2243,0102,4694,8974,2084,658
Court of Rodrigues - cases outstanding at the end of the year6012,0191,008321306653305510
Total - cases pending at the beginning of the year67,64753,01250,01443,80539,80239,33649,09652,809
Total - cases lodged137,635122,561127,353130,934126,645142,741147,194133,423
Total - cases disposed146,556118,928122,615126,591122,975128,452145,951139,667
Total - cases outstanding at the end of the year53,27050,00443,80539,80252,80939,33648,20850,339

Criticism

There are complaints about police brutality and condition of accused in the prison are still considered to be unsatisfactory. The buildup of delays in both civil and criminal cases are considered is placed as another common criticism of the system. Lord Mackay, appointed as Chairman as the Commission to reform the Judicial system and Legal Profession of Profession of Mauritius in 1998. In his recommendations, he made various recommendations including review of the role of Director of Public Prosecution (PDP), whose role is to handle all state prosecutions. Mackay was asked to review the recommendations in 2006. The delay in implementing the reforms is commonly seen as another pitfall of the judiciary. [11]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ "The Judiciary" (PDF). Government of Mauritius. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 November 2012. Retrieved 20 February 2013.
  2. ↑ "The Judicial System". Government of Mauritius. Archived from the original on 8 February 2013. Retrieved 20 February 2013.
  3. ↑ Tuyau Cedric, Overview of the Forced Heirship Rules Under the Code Civil Mauricien (May 23, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3625560
  4. ↑ Clea (2002). Directory of Commonwealth Law Schools 2003-2004. Cavendish Publishing. p. 169. ISBN   9781843144922.
  5. 1 2 3 "History". Government Portal of Mauritius . Retrieved 22 January 2015.
  6. ↑ "History of Mauritius" (PDF). Ministry of Art & Culture, Government Portal of Mauritius . Retrieved 22 January 2015.
  7. ↑ Toussaint, Auguste. Port Louis, A tropical City. ISBN   0-04-969001-9.
  8. ↑ Palmer, Vernon Valentine; Mattar, Mohamed Y. (2016). Mixed Legal Systems, East and West. Routledge. pp. 58–60. ISBN   9781317095385.
  9. ↑ Toussaint, A.; Barnwell, P.J. A short History of Mauritius.
  10. ↑ "History of the Supreme Court of Mauritius". The Supreme Court of Mauritius. 2014. Retrieved 27 October 2016.
  11. 1 2 International Business Publications, USA (20 March 2009). Mauritius Country: Strategic Information and Developments. Int'l Business Publications. p. 75. ISBN   9781438732121.
  12. ↑ IBP, Inc. (2015). Mauritius Criminal Law Regulations and Procedures Handbook - Strategic Information, Regulations, Procedures. lulu.com. p. 31. ISBN   9781514507568.
  13. ↑ Supreme Court of Mauritius 2014, p. 9
  14. ↑ Supreme Court of Mauritius 2014, p. 21
  15. ↑ Supreme Court of Mauritius 2014, p. 22
  16. ↑ Supreme Court of Mauritius 2014, p. 24
  17. 1 2 3 4 Supreme Court of Mauritius 2010, p. 27
  18. 1 2 3 4 Supreme Court of Mauritius 2014, p. 40

Related Research Articles

In the United States, a state court has jurisdiction over disputes with some connection to a U.S. state. State courts handle the vast majority of civil and criminal cases in the United States; the United States federal courts are far smaller in terms of both personnel and caseload, and handle different types of cases.

Courts of Denmark

The Courts of Denmark is the ordinary court system of the Kingdom of Denmark. The Courts of Denmark as an organizational entity was created with the Police and Judiciary Reform Act taking effect 1 January 2007 which also significantly reformed the court system e.g. by removing original jurisdiction from the High Courts and by introducing a new jury system.

Supreme Court of the Philippines Highest court in the Philippines

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the Philippines. The Supreme Court was established by the Second Philippine Commission on June 11, 1901 through the enactment of its Act No. 136, an Act which abolished the Real Audiencia de Manila, the predecessor of the Supreme Court.

Judiciary of Russia

The Judiciary of Russia interprets and applies the law of Russia. It is defined under the Constitution and law with a hierarchical structure with the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court at the apex. The district courts are the primary criminal trial courts, and the regional courts are the primary appellate courts. The judiciary is governed by the All-Russian Congress of Judges and its Council of Judges, and its management is aided by the Judicial Department of the Supreme Court, the Judicial Qualification Collegia, the Ministry of Justice, and the various courts' chairpersons. And although there are many officers of the court, including jurors, the Prosecutor General remains the most powerful component of the Russian judicial system.

Judicial system of Singapore National court system

The judiciary in Singapore is divided by the Constitution of Singapore into the Supreme Court, as well as subordinate courts, namely the State Courts and Family Justice Courts. It is led by the Chief Justice, currently Sundaresh Menon.

Judicial system of Turkey

The judicial system of Turkey is defined by Articles 138 to 160 of the Constitution of Turkey.

High Court of Singapore Lower division of national supreme court

The High Court of Singapore is the lower division of the Supreme Court of Singapore, the upper division being the Court of Appeal. It consists of the chief justice and the judges of the High Court. Judicial Commissioners are often appointed to assist with the Court's caseload. There are two specialist commercial courts, the Admiralty Court and the Intellectual Property Court, and a number of judges are designated to hear arbitration-related matters. In 2015, the Singapore International Commercial Court was established as part of the Supreme Court of Singapore, and is a division of the High Court. The seat of the High Court is the Supreme Court Building.

Law of Brazil

The law of Brazil is based on statutes and, partly and more recently, a mechanism called súmulas vinculantes. It derives mainly from the civil law systems of European countries, particularly Portugal, the Napoleonic Code and the Germanic law.

Supreme court Highest court in a jurisdiction

A supreme court is the highest court within the hierarchy of courts in many legal jurisdictions. Other descriptions for such courts include court of last resort, apex court, and highcourt of appeal. Broadly speaking, the decisions of a supreme court are not subject to further review by any other court. Supreme courts typically function primarily as appellate courts, hearing appeals from decisions of lower trial courts, or from intermediate-level appellate courts.

Judiciary of Pakistan

The judiciary of Pakistan is a hierarchical system with two classes of courts: the superior judiciary and the subordinate judiciary. The superior judiciary is composed of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, the Federal Shariat Court and five High Courts, with the Supreme Court at the apex. There is a High Court for each of the four provinces as well as a High Court for the Islamabad Capital Territory. The Constitution of Pakistan entrusts the superior judiciary with the obligation to preserve, protect and defend the constitution. Neither the Supreme Court nor a High Court may exercise jurisdiction in relation to Tribal Areas, except otherwise provided for. The disputed regions of Azad Kashmir and Gilgit–Baltistan have separate court systems.

The Indian Judiciary is a system of courts that interpret and apply the law. It uses a common law system, inherited from the legal system established by former colonial powers and the princely states, as well as some practices from ancient and medieval times.

The legal system of Azerbaijan is based on civil law. As the country was a republic of the Soviet Union until 1991, its legal history has also been influenced heavily by socialist law. However, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Azerbaijan became independent by enactment of the constitutional act of national independence on October 18, 1991. Azerbaijan started reformation of the legal system by the establishing of democratic reforms. This was followed by the adoption of the first Constitution in 1995 which is the foundation of the legislative system of the modern country. The Constitution creates the system of presidential republic with a separation of powers among the Legislative, Executive and Judicial branches of the government in order to prevent abuse of power.

Judicial system of China

The judicial branch, organized under the constitution and law, is one of five organs of power elected by the People's Congress, in the People's Republic of China.

Judiciary of Spain

The Judiciary of Spain consists of Courts and Tribunals, composed of judges and magistrates (Justices), who have the power to administer justice in the name of the King of Spain.

Law in the Republic of Vanuatu consists of a mixed system combining the legacy of English common law, French civil law and indigenous customary law. The Parliament of Vanuatu is the primary law-making body today, but pre-independence French and British statutes, English common law principles and indigenous custom all enjoy constitutional and judicial recognition to some extent.

Supreme Court of Mauritius

The Supreme Court of Mauritius is the highest court of Mauritius and is the final court of appeal in the Mauritian judicial system. It was established in its current form in 1850, replacing the Cour d'Appel established in 1808 during the French administration and has a permanent seat in Port Louis. There is a right of appeal from the Supreme Court of Mauritius directly to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council in London. On 30 July 2020, a new building was inaugurated jointly by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Mauritian Prime Minister Pravind Jugnauth.

Judiciary of Kenya

The Judiciary of Kenya is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in Kenya. After the promulgation of the constitution of Kenya in 2010, the general public, through parliament, sought to reform the judiciary. Parliament passed the Magistrates and Judges Vetting Act of 2011. A major part of reforming the judiciary was the vetting of Magistrates and Judges in an attempt to weed out unsuitable ones. The Judicature Act has also been amended to raise the minimum number of Magistrates and Judges allowing more judicial officers to be hired. More magistrates and judges are needed to clear the backlog of cases that have caused great delay in the conclusion of cases and to staff new courts. New courts are needed to bring the courts closer to the people which is in line with devolution, a major principle written into the Constitution of 2010. New courts like the High Court opened in Garissa in November 2014 is a good example. In the past residents of North Eastern Kenya had to go all the way to Embu to access a High Court.

Judiciary of Tanzania

The Judiciary of Tanzania is the system of courts that interprets and applies the law in Tanzania. The current judiciary bases its foundation to the constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania of 1977. Under the Constitution of Tanzania, Justices and Magistrates are independent of the government and subject only to the Constitution and the law. The country has a dual juristition system where there is a judicial structure responsible for Tanzania Mainland and another for Zanzibar. The Court of Appeal of the United Republic was established in 1979 as the final appellate judicial body with jurisdiction over the entire union.

The law of Cyprus is a legal system which applies within the Republic of Cyprus. Although Cypriot law is extensively codified, it is still heavily based on English common law in the sense that the fundamental principle of precedent applies.

Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic

The Supreme Court of the Dominican Republic is the highest court existing in the Republic and is, therefore, the head of the judiciary in the country.

References

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.