Kevin Jon Heller

Last updated

Kevin Jon Heller is a scholar of international law who is a Professor of International Law & Security at the University of Copenhagen's Centre for Military Studies. He has also taught at the University of Amsterdam, SOAS, University of London, and Melbourne Law School. [1]

One reviewer described Heller as "an accomplished scholar, multi-published writer, and heralded blogger on the most current and controversial topics in international law." [2]

He is co-editor-in-chief of the international-law blog Opinio Juris. [3]

Works

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuremberg trials</span> Series of military trials at the end of World War II

The Nuremberg trials were held by the Allies against representatives of the defeated Nazi Germany for plotting and carrying out invasions of other countries and atrocities against their citizens in World War II.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Doctors' Trial</span> Post-World War II trial of German doctors for war crimes

The Doctors' Trial was the first of 12 trials for war crimes of high-ranking German officials and industrialists that the United States authorities held in their occupation zone in Nuremberg, Germany, after the end of World War II. These trials were held before US military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The trials are collectively known as the "subsequent Nuremberg trials", formally the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">War of aggression</span> Military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense

A war of aggression, sometimes also war of conquest, is a military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense, usually for territorial gain and subjugation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subsequent Nuremberg trials</span> 1946–1949 trials of Nazi leadership

The subsequent Nuremberg trials were twelve military tribunals for war crimes committed by the leaders of Nazi Germany (1933–1945). The Nuremberg Military Tribunals occurred after the Nuremberg trials, held by the International Military Tribunal, which concluded in October 1946. The subsequent Nuremberg trials were held by U.S. military courts and dealt with the cases of crimes against humanity committed by the business community of Nazi Germany, specifically the crimes of using slave labor and plundering occupied countries, and the war-crime cases of Wehrmacht officers who committed atrocities against Allied prisoners of war, partisans, and guerrillas.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flick trial</span> 1947 war crimes trial against German industrialist Friedrich Flick

The United States of America vs. Friedrich Flick, et al. or Flick trial was the fifth of twelve Nazi war crimes trials held by United States authorities in their occupation zone in Germany (Nuremberg) after World War II. It was the first of three trials of leading industrialists of Nazi Germany; the two others were the IG Farben Trial and the Krupp Trial.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">IG Farben Trial</span> Post-WWII war crimes trial

The United States of America vs. Carl Krauch, et al., also known as the IG Farben Trial, was the sixth of the twelve trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany (Nuremberg) after the end of World War II. IG Farben was the private German chemicals company allied with the Nazis that manufactured the Zyklon B gas used to commit genocide against millions of European Jews in the Holocaust.

<i>Einsatzgruppen</i> trial Ninth of the 12 trials for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the Nazis

The Einsatzgruppen trial was the ninth of the twelve trials for war crimes and crimes against humanity that the US authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before US military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal. They took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve US trials are collectively known as the "Subsequent Nuremberg trials" or, more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hostages Trial</span> 1947–8 war crimes trial in Nuremberg, Germany

The Hostages Trial was held from 8 July 1947 until 19 February 1948 and was the seventh of the twelve trials for war crimes that United States authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before US military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve US trials are collectively known as the "Subsequent Nuremberg Trials" or, more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High Command Trial</span> War crimes trial

The High Command Trial, also known initially as Case No. 12, and later as Case No. 72, was the last of the twelve trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone of Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve U.S. trials are collectively known as the "subsequent Nuremberg trials" or, more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ministries Trial</span> Trial

The Ministries Trial was the eleventh of the twelve trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve U.S. trials are collectively known as the "Subsequent Nuremberg Trials" or, more formally, as the "Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals" (NMT).

The SS Main Office was the central command office of the Schutzstaffel (SS) in Nazi Germany until 1940.

Islamic criminal law is criminal law in accordance with Sharia. Strictly speaking, Islamic law does not have a distinct corpus of "criminal law". It divides crimes into three different categories depending on the offense – Hudud, Qisas, and Tazir. Some add the fourth category of Siyasah, while others consider it as part of either Hadd or Tazir crimes.

Kuniko Ozaki, is a Japanese lawyer who served as judge of the International Criminal Court and the Presiding Judge of Trial Chamber V, constituted to try the cases against four Kenyan nationals. Specially-appointed professor of International Human Right Law at Chuo University Faculty of Law (2021-).

Gregory S. Gordon is an American scholar of international law and a former genocide prosecutor during the Media Case at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Gordon is known for his advocacy of the criminalization under international law of a broader category of speech likely to cause mass atrocities, and his book Atrocity Speech Law in which he advances this argument.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cecelia Goetz</span> American lawyer and bankruptcy judge (1917–2004)

Cecelia Helen Goetz was an American lawyer and bankruptcy judge who served as a prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials.

Kim Christian Priemel is a historian of Germany and former professor at Humboldt University Berlin; he now works for the University of Oslo.

Complicity in genocide is illegal under international law both for individuals, as part of international criminal law, and state parties to the Genocide Convention. The latter was first held in the Bosnian genocide case (2007) in which the International Court of Justice held Serbia responsible for failure to prevent the Bosnian genocide.

Genocidal intent is the mens rea for the crime of genocide. "Intent to destroy" is one of the elements of the crime of genocide according to the 1948 Genocide Convention. There is an unresolved "intend debate" over whether dolus directus needs to be proven to convict for genocide, or whether a knowledge-based standard should be enough to convict for genocide.

Opinio Juris is a blog dedicated to the informed discussion of international law by and among academics, practitioners and legal experts, published independently in cooperation with the International Commission of Jurists. The blog has been described as "the leading blog on international law" at Lawfare. It is one of the two most widely read international law blogs, together with EJIL: Talk!.

The proposed International Criminal Tribunal for the Russian Federation is a proposed ad hoc international criminal tribunal aimed at prosecuting the Russian Federation and senior Russian and Belarusian leaders for the Russian invasions of Ukraine as one or more crimes of aggression, as a complement to the existing International Criminal Court investigation in Ukraine. Several international bodies announced their support for its establishment, including the Council of Europe, the European Commission, the NATO Parliamentary Assembly and the European Parliament.

References

  1. ↑ "Professor Kevin Jon Heller". ANU College of Law. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
  2. ↑ Kernan, Andrew (2012). "Book Reviews". Army Lawyer. 2012: 60.
  3. ↑ "About". Opinio Juris. 2008-07-03. Retrieved 2022-11-16.
  4. ↑ Aksenova, M. (2012). "Kevin Jon Heller and Markus D. Dubber (eds), The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law". Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10 (3): 709–711. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqs024.
  5. ↑ Chen, Siyuan (2011). "Review of The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law - The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law. Edited by Kevin J Heller & Markus D Dubber (Stanford, California: Stanford Law Books, 2011.) [660 pp. Hardcover: US$90]". Asian Journal of Comparative Law. 6: 1–5. doi:10.1017/S2194607800000508.
  6. ↑ Zaibert, Leo (2012). "Why Compare? Comments on Kevin Jon Heller and Markus D Dubber's The Handbook of Comparative Criminal Law". University of Toronto Law Journal. 62 (2): 277–292. doi:10.3138/utlj.62.2.277.
  7. ↑ "Kevin Jon Heller and the Historical Legacy of the U.S. Nuremberg Military Tribunals (NMT)". Opinio Juris. 31 October 2011.
  8. ↑ "The Legacy of the Nuremberg Military Tribunals in International Humantarian Law". Opinio Juris. 1 November 2011. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
  9. ↑ "The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and Contemporary International Criminal Law". Opinio Juris. 2 November 2011. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
  10. ↑ Dapo Akande, Peggy McGuinness and (31 October 2011). "Book Discussion: Kevin Jon Heller, Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law". EJIL: Talk!.
  11. ↑ "The NMT Trial Program and The Emergence of a Jurisprudence of Atrocity". Opinio Juris. 17 November 2011. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
  12. ↑ "Book Review: The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law by Kevin Jon Heller". LSE Review of Books. 15 April 2013. Retrieved 8 April 2022.
  13. ↑ Phillips, R. L. (2012). "Kevin Jon Heller, The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law". Journal of International Criminal Justice. 10 (2): 492–495. doi:10.1093/jicj/mqs011.
  14. ↑ Palmer, Nicola (1 December 2012). "Book Review: The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Kevin Jon Heller), (Oxford University Press, 2011)". Social Science Research Network. SSRN   2635514.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  15. ↑ Kendall, Sara (2012). "The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law by Kevin Jon Heller; Beyond Victor's Justice - The Tokyo War Crimes Trial Revisited Edited by Yuki Tanaka, Tim McCormack and Gerry Simpson". Melbourne Journal of International Law. 13: 349.
  16. ↑ "Book Reviews". International Journal of Legal Information. 40: 599. 2012.
  17. ↑ Pendas, Devin O. (2012). "The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law by Kevin Jon Heller [Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011, 509 pp, ISBN 978-0-19-955431-7, £70.00 (h/bk)]". International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 61 (2): 551–553. doi:10.1017/S0020589312000139. S2CID   145450980.
  18. ↑ Keele, Benjamin J. (2012). "The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law. By Kevin Jon Heller. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Pp. xviii, 509. ISBN: 978-0-19-955431-7. US$135.00". International Journal of Legal Information. 40 (3): 599–600. doi:10.1017/S073112650001146X. S2CID   159428640.
  19. ↑ Burghardt, Boris; Schellhaas, Fabian (2013). "Kevin Jon Heller, The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law (Oxford University Press, 2011) ISBN 978-0-19-955431-7, 536 pp". International Criminal Law Review. 13 (2): 493–503. doi:10.1163/15718123-01302005.
  20. ↑ Douglas, L. (2012). "The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law, Kevin Jon Heller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011), xviii + 509 pp., hardback, $135.00". Holocaust and Genocide Studies. 26 (2): 306–308. doi:10.1093/hgs/dcs040.
  21. ↑ Rose, C. (2012). "The Nuremberg Military Tribunals and the Origins of International Criminal Law. By KEVIN JON HELLER". British Yearbook of International Law. 82 (1): 528–530. doi:10.1093/bybil/brs037.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.