LTV XC-142

Last updated
XC-142
Ling-Temco-Vought XC-142A.jpg
Role Experimental V/STOL transport
National originUnited States
Manufacturer Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV)
First flight29 September 1964 [1] [2]
Primary user NASA
Number built5 [3]

The Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV) XC-142 is a tiltwing experimental aircraft designed to investigate the operational suitability of vertical/short takeoff and landing (V/STOL) transports. An XC-142A first flew conventionally on 29 September 1964, [4] and completed its first transitional flight on 11 January 1965 by taking off vertically, changing to forward flight, and finally landing vertically. Its service sponsors pulled out of the program one by one, and it eventually ended due to a lack of interest after demonstrating its capabilities successfully.

Contents

Development

XC-142A at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force XC142A.jpg
XC-142A at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force

In 1959 the United States Army, Navy and Air Force began work on the development of a prototype V/STOL aircraft that could augment helicopters in transport-type missions. Specifically they were interested in designs with longer range and higher speeds than existing helicopters, in order to support operations over longer distances, or in the case of the United States Marine Corps, from further offshore. On 27 January 1961, a series of DOD actions resulted in an agreement where all of the military services would work on the Tri-Service Assault Transport Program under the Navy's Bureau of Naval Weapons (BuWeps) leadership.

The original outline had been drawn up as a replacement for the Sikorsky HR2S, with a payload on the order of 10,000 lb (4,500 kg). BuWeps released a revised specification that specified the same payload, but extended the operational radius to 250 miles (400 km) and increased the cruising airspeed to 250–300 knots (460–560 km/h) and the maximum airspeed to 300–400 knots (560–740 km/h). However, for the Marine Corps mission, the requirement stated that the fuel load could be reduced so that the maximum gross weight would not exceed 35,000 pounds (16,000 kg), as long as a 100-nautical-mile (190 km) radius was maintained.

Vought responded with a proposal combining engineering from their own design arm, as well as Ryan and Hiller, who had more extensive helicopter experience. Their proposal won the design contest, and a contract for five prototypes was signed in early 1962 with first flight specified for July 1964. The design was initially known as the Vought-Ryan-Hiller XC-142, but when Vought became part of the Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV) conglomerate this naming was dropped.

During the prototype development the Navy decided to exit the program. They were concerned that the strong propeller downwash would make it difficult to operate. Their existing HR2S fleet had a ground pressure of about 7.5 psi (500 hPa), and proved to blow people about on the ground and stir up considerable amounts of debris. The C-142 was predicted to have an even higher loading of 10 psi (700 hPa), which they believed would limit it to operations to and from prepared landing pads and was therefore unsuitable for assault operations.

The first prototype made its first conventional flight on 29 September 1964, first hover on 29 December 1964, and first transition on 11 January 1965. The first XC-142A was delivered to the Air Force test team in July 1965. During the XC-142A program, a total of 420 hours were flown in 488 flights. The five XC-142As were flown by 39 different military and civilian pilots. Tests included carrier operations, simulated rescues, paratroop drops, and low-level cargo extraction.

During testing the aircraft's cross-linked driveshaft proved to be its Achilles heel. The shaft resulted in excessive vibration and noise, resulting in a high pilot workload. Additionally, it proved susceptible to problems due to wing flexing. Shaft problems, along with operator errors, resulted in a number of hard landings causing damage. One crash occurred as a result of a failure of the driveshaft to the tail rotor, causing three fatalities. One of the limitations found in the aircraft was an instability between wing angles of 35 and 80 degrees, encountered at extremely low altitudes. There were also high side forces which resulted from yaw and weak propeller blade pitch angle controls. The new "2FF" propellers also proved to generate less thrust than predicted.

Design

XC-142A at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, with the pitch rotor visible at the end of the tail XC-142A at USAF Museum.jpg
XC-142A at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force, with the pitch rotor visible at the end of the tail

The basic design was fairly typical for a cargo aircraft, consisting of a large boxy fuselage with a tilted rear area featuring a loading ramp. It had a wingspan of 67 ft (20 m) and was 58 ft (18 m) long overall. The fuselage housed a 30 ft (9.1 m) long, 7.5 ft (2.3 m) wide 7 ft (2.1 m) high cargo area with a somewhat boxy cockpit on the front for the crew of two pilots and a loadmaster. The wing was high-mounted and the tail surfaces were cruciform to keep the rear area clear during loading. Tricycle landing gear were used, with the main legs retracting into blisters on the fuselage sides. In normal parked configuration it would appear to be a conventional cargo plane.

For V/STOL operations, the aircraft "converted" by tilting its wing to the vertical. Roll control during hover was provided by differential clutching of the propellers, while yaw used the ailerons, which were in the airflow. For pitch control the aircraft featured a separate tail rotor, oriented horizontally to lift the tail, as opposed to the more conventional anti-torque rotors on helicopters that are mounted vertically. When on the ground, the tail rotor folded against the tail to avoid being damaged during loading. The wing could be rotated to 100 degrees, past vertical, in order to hover in a tailwind.

The XC-142 was powered by four General Electric T64 turboshaft engines cross-linked on a common driveshaft, which eliminated engine-out asymmetric thrust problems during V/STOL operations, to drive four 15.5-foot (4.7 m) Hamilton Standard fiberglass propellers. Compared to conventional designs it was overpowered: it had 0.27 hp/lb, compared to 0.12 hp/lb for the contemporary Lockheed C-130D Hercules. This extra power was required for safe VTOL operations, and gave the aircraft excellent all-around performance which included a maximum speed of over 400 mph (640 km/h), making it one of the fastest VTOL transport aircraft of the era.

Operational history

The XC-142 during trials aboard USS Bennington (CVS-20), in 1966 XC-142 landing on USS Bennington (CVS-20) 1966.jpg
The XC-142 during trials aboard USS Bennington (CVS-20), in 1966

The aircraft never proceeded beyond the prototype stage. Five XC-142As were built during the 1960s. [4]

The flight, made on the #2 aircraft, was 38 minutes in length, during which the aircraft's general handling characteristics were checked at an altitude of 10,000 feet at a speed of approximately 150 knots. The landing gear was left down throughout the entire flight; takeoff and landing were made with wing and flaps at 10 degrees. Throughout the flight, the aircraft demonstrated smooth response and stable aerodynamic characteristics. [5] At the end of September 1964, the overall program was analazed and considered to be "6 to 7 weeks behind schedule". [5]

In 1966, while tests were still underway, the Air Force requested a proposal for a production version, the C-142B. Since the Navy had backed out by this time, the Navy carrier compatibility requirement could be eliminated. This dramatically reduced the empty weight. Other changes proposed for this version included a streamlined cockpit, larger fuselage, upgraded engines and simplified engine maintenance. [6]

After reviewing the C-142B proposal, the tri-services management team could not develop a requirement for a V/STOL transport. XC-142A testing ended, and the remaining flying copy was turned over to NASA for research testing from May 1966 to May 1970. [6]

In service it would carry 32 equipped troops or 8,000 pounds (4,000 kg) of cargo. It had maximum gross weight of 41,000 pounds (19,000 kg) for a vertical take-off and 45,000 pounds (20,000 kg) for a short takeoff. A civilian version, the Downtowner, was also proposed. This was designed to carry 40–50 passengers at a cruise speed of 290 mph (470 km/h) using only two of its engines. [7]

Surviving aircraft

Of the five aircraft built, only one still survives.

Specifications (XC-142A)

Data fromJane's All The World's Aircraft 1965–66 [9] and [10]

General characteristics

Performance

See also

Aircraft of comparable role, configuration, and era

Related lists

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">V/STOL</span> Aircraft takeoff and landing class

A vertical and/or short take-off and landing (V/STOL) aircraft is an airplane able to take-off or land vertically or on short runways. Vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) aircraft are a subset of V/STOL craft that do not require runways at all. Generally, a V/STOL aircraft needs to be able to hover. Helicopters are not considered under the V/STOL classification as the classification is only used for aeroplanes, aircraft that achieve lift (force) in forward flight by planing the air, thereby achieving speed and fuel efficiency that is typically greater than the capability of helicopters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sukhoi Su-80</span> Russian STOL transport aircraft

The Sukhoi Su-80 is a Russian twin-turboprop, twin-boom STOL transport aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell XV-15</span> American experimental tiltrotor aircraft

The Bell XV-15 is an American tiltrotor VTOL aircraft. It was the second successful experimental tiltrotor aircraft and the first to demonstrate the concept's high speed performance relative to conventional helicopters.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tiltwing</span>

A tiltwing aircraft features a wing that is horizontal for conventional forward flight and rotates up for vertical takeoff and landing. It is similar to the tiltrotor design where only the propeller and engine rotate. Tiltwing aircraft are typically fully capable of VTOL operations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell D-188A</span> Type of aircraft

The Bell D-188A was a proposed eight-engine Mach 2–capable vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) tiltjet fighter that never proceeded past the mock-up stage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bell X-22</span> 1960s American V/STOL aircraft

The Bell X-22 is an American V/STOL X-plane with four tilting ducted fans. Takeoff was to selectively occur either with the propellers tilted vertically upwards, or on a short runway with the nacelles tilted forward at approximately 45°. Additionally, the X-22 was to provide more insight into the tactical application of vertical takeoff troop transporters such as the preceding Hiller X-18 and the X-22's successor, the Bell XV-15. Another program requirement was a true airspeed in level flight of at least 525 km/h.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ryan X-13 Vertijet</span> Experimental vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) jet aircraft

The Ryan X-13 Vertijet was an experimental tail-sitting vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) jet aircraft built by Ryan Aeronautical and flown in the United States in the 1950s. The main objective of the project was to demonstrate the ability of a pure jet to vertically takeoff, hover, transition to horizontal forward flight, and vertically land.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antonov An-14</span> 1958 utility aircraft family by Antonov

The Antonov An-14 Pchelka or Pchyolka, Bdzhilka is a Soviet utility aircraft which was first flown on 15 March 1958. It was a twin-engined light STOL utility transport, with two 300 hp Ivchenko AI-14RF radial piston engines. Serial production started in 1966, and about 300 examples were built by the time production ended in 1972. The An-14 failed to replace the more successful An-2 biplane, which was manufactured until 1990,. The An-14's successor, the An-28 with turboprop engines, is still manufactured at PZL Mielec factories in Poland, under the names PZL M28 Skytruck and PZL M28B Bryza.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hiller X-18</span> Experimental cargo transport aircraft

The Hiller X-18 was an experimental cargo transport aircraft designed to be the first testbed for tiltwing and V/STOL technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Curtiss-Wright X-19</span> Experimental VTOL tiltrotor quadcopter airplane

The Curtiss-Wright X-19, company designation Model 200, was an American experimental tiltrotor aircraft of the early 1960s. It was noteworthy for being the last aircraft of any kind manufactured by Curtiss-Wright.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing X-50 Dragonfly</span> US experimental drone aircraft

The Boeing X-50A Dragonfly, formerly known as the Canard Rotor/Wing Demonstrator, was a VTOL rotor wing experimental unmanned aerial vehicle that was developed by Boeing and DARPA to demonstrate the principle that a helicopter's rotor could be stopped in flight and act as a fixed wing, enabling it to transition between fixed-wing and rotary-wing flight.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Canadair CL-84 Dynavert</span> Canadian experimental tiltwing VSTOL aircraft

The Canadair CL-84 "Dynavert", designated by the Canadian Forces as the CX-131, was a V/STOL turbine tiltwing monoplane designed and manufactured by Canadair between 1964 and 1972. Only four of these experimental aircraft were built with three entering flight testing. Two of the CL-84s crashed due to mechanical failures, with no fatalities occurring in either of the accidents. Despite the CL-84 being successful in the experimental and operational trials carried out between 1972 and 1974, none of the prospective customers placed any orders for the type.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ryan XV-5 Vertifan</span> American experimental VTOL aircraft

The Ryan XV-5 Vertifan was a jet-powered V/STOL experimental aircraft in the 1960s. The United States Army commissioned the Ryan VZ-11-RY in 1961, along with the Lockheed VZ-10 Hummingbird. It successfully proved the concept of ducted lift fans, but the project was cancelled after multiple fatal crashes unrelated to the lift system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dornier Do 31</span> Type of aircraft

The Dornier Do 31 is an experimental, jet-propelled, vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) cargo aircraft that was designed and produced by West German aircraft manufacturer Dornier.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Powered lift</span> VTOL capable fixed-wing aircraft

A powered lift aircraft takes off and lands vertically under engine power but uses a fixed wing for horizontal flight. Like helicopters, these aircraft do not need a long runway to take off and land, but they have a speed and performance similar to standard fixed-wing aircraft in combat or other situations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LTV XQM-93</span> Type of aircraft

The Ling-Temco-Vought XQM-93 was a remotely piloted aircraft developed in the United States in the late 1960s and early 1970s for use as a communications relay in the Vietnam War. A prototype flew in 1970, but the program was abandoned without producing a service-ready aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vought YA-7F</span> Type of aircraft

The Vought YA-7F "Strikefighter" is a prototype transonic attack aircraft based on the subsonic A-7 Corsair II. Two prototypes were converted from A-7Ds. The YA-7F was not ordered into production, its intended role being filled by the F-16 Fighting Falcon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LTV L450F</span> Type of aircraft

The LTV L450F, also known as the L45ØF, was a prototype quiet reconnaissance aircraft, developed by Ling-Temco-Vought in the late 1960s for use in the Vietnam War by the United States. Based on the airframe of a Schweizer 2-32 sailplane, the aircraft flew in 1970, and was developed into the XQM-93 reconnaissance drone before the project was cancelled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaman K-16B</span> Type of aircraft

The Kaman K-16B was an experimental vertical-takeoff-and-landing aircraft that was constructed by Kaman Aircraft for the United States Navy in 1959 to evaluate the tiltwing concept. Converted from a Grumman Goose amphibian, the K-16B underwent extensive wind tunnel and tethered testing, but was not flown before the project was terminated in 1962.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sabrewing Rhaegal</span> Type of aircraft

The Sabrewing Rhaegal is a proposed American unmanned cargo aircraft developed by Californian Sabrewing Aircraft.

References

Notes
  1. Chance-Vought/LTV XC-142A- National Museum of the United States Air Force™
  2. Unclassified Defense Documentation Center for Scientific and Technical Information Cameron station ALEXANDRIA. Virginia XC-142A progress report VOLUME NO. CONTRACT NO. AF33(6öV)-7868
  3. Chance-Vought/LTV XC-142A- National Museum of the United States Air Force™
  4. 1 2 "Chance-Vought/LTV XC-142A". National Museum of the United States Air Force™. Retrieved 2023-11-12.
  5. 1 2 "Unclassified Defense Documentation Center for Scientific and Technical Information Cameron station ALEXANDRIA. Virginia XC-142A progress report VOLUME NO. CONTRACT NO. AF33(6öV)-7868" (PDF).
  6. 1 2 News, Aerotech (2021-09-25). "On this Date". Aerotech News & Review. Retrieved 2023-11-12.{{cite web}}: |last= has generic name (help)
  7. McPhee, Andrew. "Beating Gravity: Vought-Hiller-Ryan XC-142A". unrealaircraft.com, 2005. Retrieved: 15 November 2010.
  8. National Museum of the United States Air Force. "Restoration staff move the Chance-Vought/LTV XC-142A into the new fourth building at the National Museum of the U.S. Air Force on Nov. 22, 2015. (U.S. Air Force photo by Don Popp)". www.nationalmuseum.af.mil, 2015. Retrieved: 14 October 2021.
  9. Taylor 1965, pp. 264–265.
  10. Chance-Vought/LTV XC-142A- National Museum of the United States Air Force™
Bibliography

Further reading