List of United Kingdom Supreme Court cases

Last updated

This is a list of judgments given by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom between the court's inception on 1 October 2009 and the most recent judgments. Cases are listed in order of their neutral citation and where possible a link to the official text of the decision in PDF format has been provided. The case summaries below are not official or authoritative.

Contents

Unless otherwise noted, cases were heard by a panel of 5 judges.

Cases involving Scots law are highlighted in orange. Cases involving Northern Irish law are highlighted in green.

2009 judgments

Case nameCitationDecidedLegal subjectSummary of decision
R (E) v JFS [1] [2] [2009] UKSC 114 October Costs
Re Sigma Finance [2009] UKSC 229 October Insolvency Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2009] UKSC 329 October Police law, Article 8 ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Louca v Germany [2009] UKSC 419 November European Arrest Warrants Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
In re B (A Child) (2009 ruling) [2009] UKSC 519 November Family law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
OFT v Abbey National [2009] UKSC 625 November Consumer rights Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
PE (Cameroon) v Home Secretary [2009] UKSC 726 November Immigration Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (A) v Croydon [2009] UKSC 826 November Family law, Article 6 ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Barclay) v Justice Secretary [2009] UKSC 91 December Government of Sark, Protocol 1, Article 3 ECHR
I (A Child) [2009] UKSC 101 December Jurisdiction Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Environment Secretary v Meier & Ors [2009] UKSC 111 December Land law
R(A) v B [2009] UKSC 121 December State secrets, Article 10 ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Barratt Homes Ltd v Welsh Water [2009] UKSC 139 December Water Industry Act 1991 Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R v Horncastle [3] [2009] UKSC 149 December Evidence, Article 6 ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (E) v JFS [4] [2009] UKSC 1516 December Discrimination Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Mahad (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer [3] [2009] UKSC 1616 December Immigration Archived 9 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Re S-B (Children) [2009] UKSC 1714 December Family law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine

2010 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
Re. Guardian News Media, in HM Treasury v Ahmed [3] [2010] UKSC 127 January Article 8, ECHR; Article 10, ECHR
HM Treasury v Ahmed [3] [2010] UKSC 227 January Terrorism; Asset freezing Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Office of Communications v The Information Commissioner [2010] UKSC 327 January Freedom of information Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Grays Timber Products Ltd v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] UKSC 43 February Tax law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
HM Treasury v Ahmed (No 2) [3] [5] [2010] UKSC 54 February Asset freezing
Allison v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 610 February Criminal law of Scotland Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
McInnes v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 710 February Criminal law of Scotland Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Tomlinson v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 817 February Homelessness in England Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Norris v USA [4] [2010] UKSC 924 February Extradition; Article 8, ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Martin v HM Advocate [2010] UKSC 103 March Scottish Devolution Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Lewis) v Redcar & Cleveland BC [2010] UKSC 113 March Town Greens Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Re W (Children) [2010] UKSC 123 March Family law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Agbaje v Akinnoye-Agbaje [2010] UKSC 1310 March Family law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Müller GmbH [2010] UKSC 1410 March Contract law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (JS (Sri Lanka)) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 1517 March Terrorism; immigration Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
British Airways v Williams [2010] UKSC 1624 March Labour law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (F) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 1721 April Sexual Offences Act 2003; Article 8, ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Farstad Supply v Enviroco [2010] UKSC 185 May Negligence Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Inveresk plc v Tullis Russell Papermakers [2010] UKSC 195 May Scots contract law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd) v Wolverhampton CC [3] [2010] UKSC 2012 May Planning law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
ZN (Afghanistan) v Entry Clearance Officer [2010] UKSC 2112 May Immigration law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Roberts v Gill & Co [2010] UKSC 2219 May Wills Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
OB v Aventis Pasteur SA [2010] UKSC 2326 May Limitation periods Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Home Secretary v AP [3] [2010] UKSC 2416 June Control orders; Article 8, ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 2516 June Immigration law Archived 6 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
Home Secretary v AP (No 2) [3] [6] [2010] UKSC 2623 June Article 8, ECHR
JR17 (Judicial Review App.) [2010] UKSC 2723 June Right to education Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Austin v Southwark LBC [2010] UKSC 2823 June Landlord-tenant law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R(Smith) v Defence Secretary [4] [2010] UKSC 2930 June Article 2, ECHR; Jurisdictional law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Noone) v Drale Hall Prison [2010] UKSC 3030 June Sentencing Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
HJ (Iran) and HT (Cameroon) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 317 July Immigration law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Southern Pacific Loans v Walker [2010] UKSC 327 July Consumer Credit Act 1974 Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
A v Essex CC [2010] UKSC 3314 July Right to education Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
O'Brien v Ministry of Justice [2010] UKSC 3428 July Discrimination law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Bocardo SA v Star Energy UK [2010] UKSC 3528 July Trespass Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (ZO (Somalia)) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 3628 July Immigration law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Morrison Sports v Scottish Power [2010] UKSC 3728 July Electricity Act 1989 Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
RTS Flexible Systems Ltd v Molkerei Alois Müller GmbH (No 2) [7] [2010] UKSC 3821 July Contract law
R v Rollins [3] [2010] UKSC 3928 July Criminal law; Money laundering Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Electoral Commission) v Westminster Magistrates' Court [3] [2010] UKSC 4029 July Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000
Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 4113 October Labour law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Radmacher v Granatino [4] [2010] UKSC 4220 October Prenuptial agreements Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Cadder v HM Advocate [3] [2010] UKSC 4326 October Criminal Procedure, Article 6 ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading v TMT Asia [3] [2010] UKSC 4427 October Contract law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Manchester CC v Pinnock [4] [2010] UKSC 453 November Housing, Article 8 ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Dallah Real Estate & Tourism v Pakistan [2010] UKSC 463 November Arbitration, ICC
Multi-Link Leisure v North Lanarkshire Council [2010] UKSC 4717 November Tenancy agreements Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R v Maxwell [2010] UKSC 4817 November Retrial Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
MA (Somalia) v Home Secretary [2010] UKSC 4924 November Immigration law, Article 3 ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
RBS v Wilson [2010] UKSC 5024 November Securities, Property law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Customs v Holland [2010] UKSC 5124 November Company law, Insolvency Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R v Chaytor [4] [2010] UKSC 521 December Parliamentary privilege, Parliamentary expenses Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Spiller v Joseph [2010] UKSC 531 December Defamation, Fair comment Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Child Poverty Action Group) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] UKSC 548 December Housing benefit Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Progress Property v Moorgarth Group [2010] UKSC 558 December Company law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Principal Reporter v K [2010] UKSC 5615 December Family law; Article 8, ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Edwards) v Environment Agency [2010] UKSC 5715 December Costs Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
HM Revenue and Customs v DCC Holdings [2010] UKSC 5815 December Tax law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine

2011 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
R (Coke-Wallis) v Institute of Chartered Accountants [2011] UKSC 119 January 2011 Labour law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Morge v Hampshire County Council [2011] UKSC 219 January 2011 Planning law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Yemshaw v Hounslow [2011] UKSC 326 January 2011 Homelessness; Domestic violence Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
ZH (Tanzania) v Home Secretary [2011] UKSC 41 February 2011 Children law; Immigration law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
GPS Inc. v Syarikat Takaful Malaysia Berhad [2011] UKSC 51 February 2011 Maritime law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Manchester CC v Pinnock (No 2) [8] [2011] UKSC 69 February 2011 Article 8, ECHR; Landlord-tenant law
Brent LBC v Risk Management Partners [2011] UKSC 79 February 2011 Public procurement Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Hounslow LBC v Powell [3] [2011] UKSC 823 February 2011 Article 8, ECHR; Homelessness Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R v Forsyth [2011] UKSC 923 February 2011 Criminal law; International law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Sienkiewicz v Greif [3] [2011] UKSC 109 March 2011 Negligence Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Patmalniece v Secretary for Work and Pensions [2011] UKSC 1116 March 2011 Free movement of workers Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
WL (Congo) v Home Secretary [4] [2011] UKSC 1223 March 2011 False imprisonment Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Jones v Kaney [3] [2011] UKSC 1330 March 2011 Expert witnesses Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Duncombe v Schools Secretary [2011] UKSC 1430 March 2011 Labour law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Communities Secretary v Welwyn Hatfield BC [3] [2011] UKSC 156 April 2011 Planning law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Farstad Supply v Enviroco [2011] UKSC 166 April 2011 Company law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Baker v Quantum Clothing Group [2011] UKSC 1713 April 2011 Negligence Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Adams) v Justice Secretary [3] [2011] UKSC 1811 May 2011 Miscarriage of justice Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
HMRC v Tower MCashback [4] [2011] UKSC 1911 May 2011 Tax law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
McCaughey's Application for Judicial Review [3] [2011] UKSC 2018 May 2011 Judicial review Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (GC) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [3] [2011] UKSC 2118 May 2011 DNA evidence, Article 8 ECHR Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
FA (Iraq) v Home Secretary [2011] UKSC 2225 May 2011 EU law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
SK(Zimbabwe) v Home Secretary [2011] UKSC 2325 May 2011 Immigration law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Fraser v Her Majesty's Advocate [2011] UKSC 2425 May 2011 Scots criminal law; Evidence Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Bloomsbury v Sea Fish Industry Authority [2011] UKSC 2515 June 2011 Fisheries Act 1981; Free movement of goods Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Parkwood Leisure v Alemo-Herron [2011] UKSC 2615 June 2011 TUPE Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
Re. E (Children) [2011] UKSC 2710 June 2011 Family law Archived 8 April 2014 at the Wayback Machine
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal [3] [2011] UKSC 2822 June 2011 Judicial review
Eba v Advocate General for Scotland [3] [2011] UKSC 2922 June 2011 Judicial review
R (G) v The Governors of X School [2011] UKSC 3029 June 2011 Article 6, ECHR
NML Capital Ltd v Republic of Argentina [2011] UKSC 316 July 2011 State immunity
Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [9] [2011] UKSC 326 July 2011 Company law
R (McDonald) v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2011] UKSC 336 July 2011 Assisted living
Al Rawi v The Security Service [4] [10] [2011] UKSC 3413 July 2011 Secret trial
Home Office v Tariq [4] [10] [2011] UKSC 3513 July 2011 Secret trial
Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children, Schools and Families (no. 2) [2011] UKSC 3615 July 2011 Labour law
R v Smith [2011] UKSC 3720 July 2011 Criminal law
Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc [2011] UKSC 3827 July 2011 Insolvency law
Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth [2011] UKSC 3927 July 2011 Intellectual property Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
Jivraj v Hashwani [2011] UKSC 4027 July 2011 Discrimination in employment
Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher [2011] UKSC 4127 July 2011 Labour law
Houldsworth v Bridge Trustees Ltd and Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] UKSC 4227 July 2011 Pensions law
HM Advocate v Ambrose & Ors [2011] UKSC 436 October 2011 Right to counsel; Article 6, ECHR
HM Advocate v P [2011] UKSC 446 October 2011 Right to counsel; Article 6, ECHR
R (Bibi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4512 October 2011 Immigration law; Article 8, ECHR
AXA General Insurance Ltd v The Lord Advocate [2011] UKSC 4612 October 2011 Negligence
R (Gaines-Cooper) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2011] UKSC 4719 October 2011 Tax law
Re. Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander Ltd and Re the Insolvency Act 1986 [2011] UKSC 4819 October 2011 Insolvency law
Gale v Serious Organised Crime Agency [3] [2011] UKSC 4926 October 2011 Criminal law
Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 502 November 2011 Contract law
Human Genome Sciences Inc v Eli Lilly & Co. [2011] UKSC 512 November 2011 Intellectual property
Berrisford v Mexfield Housing Co-operative Ltd [3] [2011] UKSC 529 November 2011 Land law
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 539 November 2011 Land law
McGowan v B [2011] UKSC 5423 November 2011 Right to counsel; Article 6, ECHR
Jude v HM Advocate [2011] UKSC 5523 November 2011 Right to counsel; Article 6, ECHR
Aberdeen City Council v Stewart Milne Group Ltd [2011] UKSC 567 December 2011 Land law
Russell v Transocean International Resources Ltd [2011] UKSC 577 December 2011 Working Time Regulations 1998
Edwards v Chesterfield Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] UKSC 5814 December 2011 Labour law
R v Gnango [2011] UKSC 5914 December 2011 Criminal law
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne [2011] UKSC 6014 December 2011 Insolvency law

2012 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Ltd [2012] UKSC 18 February 2012 Jurisdiction; Labour law
Rabone v Pennine Care NHS Trust [2012] UKSC 28 February 2012 Article 2, ECHR
Re. Stanford International Bank Ltd v Director of the Serious Fraus Office [2012] UKSC 315 February 2012 Restraint order
Sugar v British Broadcasting Corporation [2012] UKSC 415 February 2012 Freedom of information
Re Peacock [2012] UKSC 522 February 2012 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
Re Lehman Brothers International and Re the Insolvency Act 1986 [2012] UKSC 629 February 2012 Insolvency law
Anderson v Shetland Islands Council [2012] UKSC 729 February 2012 Security for costs Archived 4 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine
W and BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 87 March 2012 Immigration law
Ministry of Defence v AB [3] [2012] UKSC 914 March 2012 Limitation Act 1980
Re S (A Child) [2012] UKSC 1014 March 2012 Child abduction
Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd [2012] UKSC 1121 March 2012 Defamation
R (ST) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [3] [2012] UKSC 1221 March 2012 Immigration law
Tesco Stores Ltd v Dundee City Council [2012] UKSC 1321 March 2012 Planning law
BAI (Run Off) Ltd v Durham (The Trigger Litigation) [2012] UKSC 1428 March 2012 Insurance law; negligence
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 1525 April 2012 Labour law It was a violation of the Equality Act 2010 to require a policeman to have a law degree close to retirement to continue in a similar job.
Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 1625 April 2012 Labour law There was no unjustified indirect discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 by a firm having a policy of requiring partners to retire at a certain age, since this enabled young people to advance.
Petroleo Brasileiro SA v E.N.E. Kos 1 Ltd [2012] UKSC 172 May 2012 Maritime law
Humphreys v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2012] UKSC 1816 May 2012 Tax credit
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [3] [2012] UKSC 1923 May 2012 Corporation tax
Lukaszewski v The District Court in Torun, Poland [2012] UKSC 2023 May 2012 European Arrest Warrant
NJDB v JEG [2012] UKSC 2123 May 2012 Family law
Assange v The Swedish Prosecution Authority [3] [2012] UKSC 2230 May 2012 European Arrest Warrant
R (KM) v Cambridgeshire County Council [3] [2012] UKSC 2331 May 2012 Disability law
BH v The Lord Advocate [3] [2012] UKSC 2420 June 2012 Extradition; Article 8, ECHR
HH v Deputy Prosecutor of the Italian Republic, Genoa [3] [2012] UKSC 2520 June 2012 European Arrest Warrant
Fairclough Homes Ltd v Summers [2012] UKSC 2627 June 2012 Criminal law
Oracle America Inc (Formerly Sun Microsystems Inc) v M-Tech Data Ltd [2012] UKSC 2727 June 2012 Free movement of goods
Phillips v Mulcaire [2012] UKSC 284 July 2012 Phone hacking
Gow v Grant [2012] UKSC 294 July 2012 Family law
ANS v ML [2012] UKSC 3011 July 2012 Family law; Article 8, ECHR
G Hamilton (Tullochgribban Mains) Ltd v The Highland Council [2012] UKSC 3111 July 2012 Planning law
R (Munir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 3218 July 2012 Immigration law
R (Alvi) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 3318 July 2012 Immigration law
The Health and Safety Executive v Wolverhampton City Council [2012] UKSC 3418 July 2012 Judicial review
Perry v Serious Organised Crime Agency [4] [2012] UKSC 3525 July 2012 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
T (Children) [2012] UKSC 3625 July 2012 Costs
Hewage v Grampian Health Board [2012] UKSC 3725 July 2012 Labour law
RT v Secretary of State for the Home Department [3] [2012] UKSC 3825 July 2012 Immigration law
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin [2012] UKSC 3925 July 2012 Landlord-tenant law
SerVaas Inc v Rafidain Bank [2012] UKSC 4017 August 2012 State Immunity Act 1978
Day v Hosebay Ltd [3] [2012] UKSC 4110 October 2012 Leasehold Reform Act 1967
R v Varma [2012] UKSC 4210 October 2012 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
British Airways plc v Williams [2012] UKSC 4317 October 2012 Labour law
Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 4417 October 2012 Planning law
BCL Old Co Ltd v BASF plc [2012] UKSC 4524 October 2012 Competition law
Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2012] UKSC 4624 October 2012 Jurisdiction
Birmingham City Council v Abdulla [2012] UKSC 4724 October 2012 Labour law
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v Yunus Rahmatullah [3] [2012] UKSC 4831 October 2012 Habeas corpus
Jessy Saint Prix v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2012] UKSC 4931 October 2012 Labour law
Morris v Rae [2012] UKSC 507 November 2012 Contract law
R v Waya [4] [2012] UKSC 5114 November 2012 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
R (Gujra) v Crown Prosecution Service [2012] UKSC 5214 November 2012 Private prosecution
Local Government Byelaws (Wales) Bill 2012 - Reference by the Attorney General for England and Wales [2012] UKSC 5321 November 2012 Welsh devolution
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 5421 November 2012 Immigration law
The Rugby Football Union v Consolidated Information Services Ltd (Formerly Viagogo Ltd) [2012] UKSC 5521 November 2012 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
The Catholic Child Welfare Society v Various Claimants and The Institute of the Brothers of the Christian Schools [2012] UKSC 5621 November 2012 Vicarious liability
Ruddy v Chief Constable, Strathclyde Police [2012] UKSC 5728 November 2012 Article 3, ECHR
RM v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 5828 November 2012 Judicial review
X v Mid Sussex Citizens Advice Bureau [2012] UKSC 5912 December 2012 Labour law
Re A (A Child) [2012] UKSC 6012 December 2012 Family law
Imperial Tobacco Ltd v The Lord Advocate [2012] UKSC 6112 December 2012 Scottish devolution
Kinloch v Her Majesty's Advocate [2012] UKSC 6219 December 2012 Article 6, ECHR; Article 8, ECHR
Société Générale, London Branch v Geys [2012] UKSC 6319 December 2012 Labour law

2013 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
R (Prudential plc) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax [3] [2013] UKSC 123 January 2013 Legal advice privilege
Zakrzewski v The Regional Court in Lodz, Poland [2013] UKSC 223 January 2013 European arrest warrant
Lloyds TSB Foundation for Scotland v Lloyds Banking Group Plc [2013] UKSC 323 January 2013 Deed law
B (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 430 January 2013 Sentencing
VTB Capital plc v Nutritek International Corp [2013] UKSC 56 February 2013 Company law
O'Brien v Ministry of Justice (Formerly the Department for Constitutional Affairs) [2013] UKSC 66 February 2013 Labour law
Re Digital Satellite Warranty Cover Ltd v Financial Services Authority [2013] UKSC 713 February 2013 Company law
Re L and B (Children) [2013] UKSC 820 February 2013 Family law
Re J (Children) [3] [2013] UKSC 920 February 2013 Family law
Sharif v The London Borough of Camden [2013] UKSC 1020 February 2013 Homelessness law
The Financial Services Authority v Sinaloa Gold plc [2013] UKSC 1127 February 2013 Financial Services and Markets Act 2000
Davies v The Scottish Commission for the Regulation of Care [2013] UKSC 1227 February 2013 Care law
Joint Administrators of Heritable Bank plc v The Winding-Up Board of Landsbanki Islands HF [2013] UKSC 1327 February 2013 Insolvency law
Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson [2013] UKSC 146 March 2013 Landlord-tenant law
Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Aimia Coalition Loyalty UK Ltd (No 1) [2013] UKSC 1513 March 2013 Tax law
Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit (UK) Ltd [2013] UKSC 1613 March 2013 Intellectual property law
Hayes v Willoughby [2013] UKSC 1720 March 2013 Protection from Harassment Act 1997
Public Relations Consultants Association Ltd v The Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd [2013] UKSC 1817 April 2013 Copyright law
Jones (by Caldwell) v First Tier Tribunal and Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority [2013] UKSC 1917 April 2013 Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority
Barts and the London NHS Trust v Verma [2013] UKSC 2024 April 2013 Labour law
Uprichard v Scottish Ministers [2013] UKSC 2124 April 2013 Planning law
Salvesen v Riddell [2013] UKSC 2224 April 2013 Scottish devolution
R (Faulkner) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] UKSC 231 May 2013 Criminal law
WHA Ltd v Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2013] UKSC 241 May 2013 Tax law
R (ClientEarth) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2013] UKSC 251 May 2013 Environmental law
Futter v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [3] [2013] UKSC 269 May 2013 Trust law Archived 15 July 2015 at the Wayback Machine
SL v Westminster City Council [2013] UKSC 279 May 2013 Judicial review; National Assistance Act 1948
BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v Neuberger Berman Europe Ltd [2013] UKSC 289 May 2013 Insolvency law
The President of the Methodist Conference v Preston [2013] UKSC 2915 May 2013 Labour law
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc [2013] UKSC 3022 May 2013 Company law
Vestergaard Frandsen v Bestnet Europe Ltd [2013] UKSC 3122 May 2013 Breach of confidence
Public Prosecution Service of Northern Ireland v Elliott [2013] UKSC 3222 May 2013 Policing and Crime Act 2009
Re B (A Child) [2013] UKSC 3312 June 2013 Family law
Prest v Petrodel Resources Ltd [3] [2013] UKSC 3412 June 2013 Family law
Ust-Kamenogorsk Hydropower Plant JSC v AES Ust-Kamenogorstk Hydropower Plant LLP [2013] UKSC 3512 June 2013 Jurisdiction
O'Neill No 2 v Her Majesty's Advocate [2013] UKSC 3613 June 2013 Article 6, ECHR
Apollo Engineering Ltd v James Scott Ltd [2013] UKSC 3713 June 2013 Jurisdiction
Bank Mellat v Her Majesty's Treasury (No. 1) [4] [2013] UKSC 3819 June 2013 Closed material procedures
Bank Mellat v Her Majesty's Treasury (No. 2) [4] [2013] UKSC 3919 June 2013 Closed material procedures
Cusack v London Borough of Harrow [2013] UKSC 4019 June 2013 Highways Act 1980
Smith v The Ministry of Defence [3] [2013] UKSC 4119 June 2013 Jurisdiction; Article 2, ECHR; Negligence
Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Aimia Coalition Loyalty UK Ltd (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 4220 June 2013 Tax law
R v Brown[2013] UKSC 4326 June 2013 Criminal law of Northern Ireland
Abela v Baadarani [2013] UKSC 4426 June 2013 Civil Procedure Rules
North v Dumfries and Galloway Council [2013] UKSC 4526 June 2013 Labour law
Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd v Zodiac Seats UK Ltd [2013] UKSC 463 July 2013 Intellectual property law
R (Sturnham) v The Parole Board of England and Wales [2013] UKSC 473 July 2013 Criminal law
Kapri v The Lord Advocate representing The Government of the Republic of Albania [2013] UKSC 4810 July 2013 Extradition; Article 6, ECHR
R (AA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 4910 July 2013 Immigration law
Benedetti v Sawiris [2013] UKSC 5017 July 2013 Unjust enrichment
R (New London College Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 5117 July 2013 Immigration law
Re Nortel Companies [2013] UKSC 5224 July 2013 Pensions Act 2004, insolvency law
R (Modaresi) v Secretary of State for Health [2013] UKSC 5324 July 2013 Mental Health Act 1983
Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 5424 July 2013 Landlord-tenant law
South Lanarkshire Council v The Scottish Information Commissioner [2013] UKSC 5529 July 2013 Freedom of information
R v Hughes[2013] UKSC 5631 July 2013 Criminal law
Teal Assurance Company Ltd v W R Berkley Insurance Ltd [2013] UKSC 5731 July 2013 Professional liability insurance
McGraddie v McGraddie [2013] UKSC 5831 July 2013 Findings of fact
Torfaen County Borough Council v Douglas Willis Ltd [2013] UKSC 5931 July 2013 Food Safety Act 1990
Re A (Children) [2013] UKSC 609 September 2013 Jurisdiction
Osborn v The Parole Board [2013] UKSC 619 October 2013 Article 5, ECHR
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Al-Jedda [2013] UKSC 629 October 2013 Immigration law
McGeoch v The Lord President of the Council [3] [2013] UKSC 6316 October 2013 Prisoner voting
R v Gul [3] [2013] UKSC 6423 October 2013 Terrorism Act 2000
Szepietowski v The National Crime Agency [2013] UKSC 6523 October 2013 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
Woodland v Essex County Council [2013] UKSC 66 23 October 2013 Tort law A school was liable for the failure of a swimming instructor contractor to take care of children, even though pupils and parents have no contract with the school.
Aintree University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v James [2013] UKSC 6730 October 2013 Medical law
R (Reilly) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] UKSC 6830 October 2013 Jobseeker's Allowance
Cotter v Commissioners For Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs [2013] UKSC 696 November 2013 Tax law
The Alexandros T [2013] UKSC 706 November 2013 Jurisdiction; Shipping law
Sakalis v Ministry of Justice, Lithuania [2013] UKSC 7120 November 2013 European Arrest Warrant
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 7220 November 2013 Immigration law
Bull v Hall [2013] UKSC 7327 November 2013 Equality Act (Sexual Orientation) Regulations
Zoumbas v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] UKSC 7427 November 2013 Immigration law
Re KL (A Child) [2013] UKSC 754 December 2013 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Re an application by Martin Corey for Judicial Review [2013] UKSC 764 December 2013 Northern Irish criminal law
R (Hodkin) v Registrar-General of Births, Deaths and Marriages [2013] UKSC 7711 December 2013 Family law
R (Edwards) v Environment Agency (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 7811 December 2013 Costs
G v Scottish Ministers [2013] UKSC 7918 December 2013 Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003
West London Mental Health NHS Trust v Chhabra [2013] UKSC 8018 December 2013 Patient confidentiality; Labour law
AA (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer (Addis Ababa) [2013] UKSC 8118 December 2013 Immigration law

2014 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
Re LC (Children) [2014] UKSC 115 January 2014 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Marley v Rawlings [2014] UKSC 222 January 2014 Wills
R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 322 January 2014 Judicial review
Re an application of Raymond Brownlee for Judicial Review [2014] UKSC 45 February 2014 Legal aid
R v Mackle (Nos. 1, 2 and 3), and R v McLaughlin [2014] UKSC 529 January 2014 Evasion of customs duty
I.A. v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 629 January 2014 Immigration law
Adamson v Paddico (267) Ltd [2014] UKSC 75 February 2014 Village greens
Richardson v DPP [2014] UKSC 85 February 2014 Criminal law
Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie-Grant, Earl of Seafield [2014] UKSC 912 February 2014 Delict
Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2014] UKSC 1019 February 2014 Trusts; Fraud; Jurisdiction
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Marks and Spencer plc [2014] UKSC 1119 February 2014 Corporate tax
R (EM (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 1219 February 2014 Immigration law; Article 3, ECHR
Coventry v Lawrence [2014] UKSC 1326 February 2014 Legal Expenses Insurance; Article 6, ECHR
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Forde and McHugh Ltd [2014] UKSC 1426 February 2014 National Insurance
Stott v Thomas Cook Tour Operators Ltd [2014] UKSC 155 March 2014 Montreal Convention
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Secret Hotels2 Ltd (formerly Med Hotels Ltd) [2014] UKSC 165 March 2014 Value Added Tax
R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2014] UKSC 1712 March 2014 Secret trial
Dunhill v Burgin [2014] UKSC 1812 March 2014 Negligence
P v v Cheshire West and Chester Council [3] [2014] UKSC 1919 March 2014 Mental Capacity Act 2005
Kennedy v The Charity Commission [3] [2014] UKSC 2026 March 2014 Freedom of information
Durkin v DSG Retail Ltd [2014] UKSC 2126 March 2014 Consumer protection law
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria) [2014] UKSC 222 April 2014 Jurisdiction
R v O'Brien [2014] UKSC 232 April 2014 Extradition Act 2003
British Telecommunications plc v Telefónica O2 Ltd [2014] UKSC 249 April 2014 Competition law
A v British Broadcasting Corporation [2014] UKSC 258 May 2014 Article 10, ECHR
Barnes v The Eastenders Group [2014] UKSC 268 May 2014 Receivership
L Batley Pet Products Ltd v North Lanarkshire Councilt [2014] UKSC 278 May 2014 Contract law
R (Fitzroy George) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 2814 May 2014 Immigration law
Re K (A Child) [2014] UKSC 2915 May 2014 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Secretary of State for Home Department v MN and KY [2014] UKSC 3021 May 2014 Immigration law
R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council [2014] UKSC 3121 May 2014 Village green
Clyde & Co LLP v Winkelhof [2014] UKSC 3221 May 2014 Labour law
Khaira v Shergill [2014] UKSC 3311 June 2014 Trust law
R (Eastenders Cash and Carry plc) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2014] UKSC 3411 June 2014 HM Customs and Excise
R (T) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 3518 June 2014 Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974
R v Ahmad [2014] UKSC 3618 June 2014 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
R (Nunn) v Chief Constable of Suffolk Constabulary [2014] UKSC 3718 June 2014 Evidence
R (Nicklinson) v Ministry of Justice [4] [2014] UKSC 3825 June 2014 Assisted suicide
R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 392 July 2014 Article 5, ECHR
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilities Water plc [2014] UKSC 402 July 2014 Water Industry Act 1991
Henderson v Foxworth Investments Ltd [2014] UKSC 412 July 2014 Insolvency law
British Telecommunications plc v Telefónica O2 Ltd [2014] UKSC 429 July 2014 Competition law
Agricultural Sector (Wales) Bill - Reference by the Attorney General for England and Wales [2014] UKSC 439 July 2014 Devolution in Wales
R (Sandiford) v The Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] UKSC 4416 July 2014 Lindsay Sandiford case; Consular assistance
FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC [3] [2014] UKSC 4516 July 2014 Duties of a fiduciary
Coventry v Lawrence (No. 2) [2014] UKSC 4623 July 2014 Injunctions; Article 6, ECHR Archived 4 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
Hounga v Allen [2014] UKSC 4730 July 2014 Labour law
David T Morrison & Co Ltd t/a Gael Home Interiors v ICL Plastics Ltd [2014] UKSC 4830 July 2014 Delict
Healthcare at Home Ltd v The Common Services Agency [2014] UKSC 4930 July 2014 Procurement
Robertson v Swift [2014] UKSC 509 September 2014 Consumer protection law
Marley v Rawlings (Costs) [2014] UKSC 5118 September 2014 Costs
Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd [2014] UKSC 5222 October 2014 Sale and rent back
McDonald v National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc [2014] UKSC 5322 October 2014 Mesothelioma; Negligence
R (Barclay) v Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor [2014] UKSC 5422 October 2014 Jurisdiction
Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Inc [2014] UKSC 5529 October 2014 Ex turpi causa
R (Moseley) v London Borough of Haringey [2014] UKSC 5629 October 2014 Council tax
Telchadder v Wickland Holdings Ltd [2014] UKSC 575 November 2014 Occupiers' liability
AIB Group (UK) v Mark Redler & Co Solicitors [2014] UKSC 585 November 2014 Breach of trust
VB v Westminster Magistrates' Court [2014] UKSC 595 November 2014 Secret trial; Article 6, ECHR
R (Lord Carlile of Berriew QC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] UKSC 6012 November 2014 Article 10, ECHR
Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd [2014] UKSC 6112 November 2014 Payment protection insurance
R (ZH and CN) v London Borough of Newham and London Borough of Lewisham [3] [2014] UKSC 6212 November 2014 Homelessness
Sims v Dacorum Borough Council [3] [2014] UKSC 6312 November 2014 Landlord-tenant law
HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal Bin Abdulaziz v Apex Global Management Ltd [2014] UKSC 6426 November 2014 Company law
Loveridge v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth [2014] UKSC 653 December 2014 Eviction
R (Haney, Kaiyam & Massey) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 6610 December 2014 Sentencing; Article 5, ECHR
Moohan v The Lord Advocate [3] [2014] UKSC 6717 December 2014 Prisoners' voting
Greater Glasgow Health Board v Doogan [2014] UKSC 6817 December 2014 Abortion; Conscientious objection

2015 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
McGraddie v McGraddie (Costs) [2015] UKSC 128 January 2015 After-the-event insurance
Michael v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police [3] [2015] UKSC 228 January 2015 Negligence; Article 2, ECHR
Recovery of Medical Costs for Asbestos Diseases (Wales) Bill - Reference by the Counsel General for Wales [2015] UKSC 39 February 2015 Welsh devolution
Sustainable Shetland v The Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 49 February 2015 Planning law
Jackson v Murray [2015] UKSC 518 February 2015 Contributory negligence
R (Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [3] [2015] UKSC 625 February 2015 Judicial review; European Structural Funds
R (Newhaven Port & Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council [2015] UKSC 725 February 2015 Village green
R (Jamar Brown (Jamaica)) v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 84 March 2015 Immigration law
R (Catt) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 94 March 2015 Data Protection Act 1998; Article 8, ECHR
Sea Shepherd UK v Fish & Fish Ltd [2015] UKSC 104 March 2015 Tort
Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [3] [2015] UKSC 1111 March 2015 Medical law
Tael One Partners Ltd v Morgan Stanley & Co International PLC [2015] UKSC 1211 March 2015 Contractual conditions
Carlyle v Royal Bank of Scotland PLC [2015] UKSC 1311 March 2015 Scottish contract law
Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 1411 March 2015 Divorce law
Akerman-Livingstone v Aster Communities Ltd (formerly Flourish Homes Ltd) [2015] UKSC 1511 March 2015 Equality Act 2010; Article 8, ECHR
R (SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 1618 March 2015 Welfare Reform Act 2012; Article 14, ECHR
Braganza v BP Shipping Ltd [2015] UKSC 1718 March 2015 Fatal Accidents Act 1976
R (Trail Riders Fellowship) v Dorset County Council [2015] UKSC 1818 March 2015 Public rights of way
Pham v Secretary of State for the Home Department [3] [2015] UKSC 1925 March 2015 Immigration law
Re S (A Child) [2015] UKSC 2025 March 2015 Costs
R (Evans) v Attorney General [3] [2015] UKSC 2126 March 2015 Freedom of Information Act 2000
Nzolameso v City of Westminster [2015] UKSC 222 April 2015 Homelessness
Jetivia SA v Bilta (UK) Ltd [3] [2015] UKSC 2322 April 2015 Insolvency law
R v GH [2015] UKSC 2422 April 2015 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
R (Hemming) v Westminster City Council [2015] UKSC 2529 April 2015 Licensed sex shop
University and College Union v The University of Stirling [2015] UKSC 2629 April 2015 Redundancy law
Trustees of the Olympic Airlines SA Pension and Life Assurance Scheme v Olympic Airlines SA [2015] UKSC 2729 April 2015 Pension Protection Fund
R (ClientEarth) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs [2015] UKSC 2829 April 2015 Environmental law
Gaughran v Chief Constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland [2015] UKSC 2913 May 2015 DNA database; Article 8, ECHR
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark [2015] UKSC 3013 May 2015 Homelessness
Starbucks (HK) Ltd v British Sky Broadcasting Group plc [2015] UKSC 3113 May 2015 Passing off
Rhodes v OPO [2015] UKSC 3220 May 2015 Freedom of expression
Zurich Insurance PLC UK Branch v International Energy Group Ltd [3] [2015] UKSC 3320 May 2015 Mesothelioma
Haile v London Borough of Waltham Forest [2015] UKSC 3420 May 2015 Homelessness
AR v RN [2015] UKSC 3522 May 2015 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction
Arnold v Britton [2015] UKSC 3610 June 2015 Contract law
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Pendragon plc [2015] UKSC 3710 June 2015 VAT
Aspect Contracts (Asbestos) Ltd v Higgins Construction Plc [2015] UKSC 3817 June 2015 Contract law
BPE Solicitors v Gabriel [2015] UKSC 3917 June 2015 Costs
TN and MA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 4024 June 2015 Immigration law
R (Lumsdon) v Legal Services Board [2015] UKSC 4124 June 2015 Judicial review
In re JR38 [2015] UKSC 421 July 2015 Article 8, ECHR
Bunge SA v Nidera BV [2015] UKSC 431 July 2015 Contract law
Anson v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2015] UKSC 441 July 2015 Tax law
Edenred (UK Group) Ltd v HM Treasury [2015] UKSC 451 July 2015 Public procurement
R (Cornwall Council) v Somerset County Council [2015] UKSC 468 July 2015 National Assistance Act 1948
Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 478 July 2015 Disability Living Allowance, EU law
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The Rank Group PLC [2015] UKSC 488 July 2015 VAT
Beghal v DPP [2015] UKSC 4922 July 2015 Terrorism Act 2000
Coventry v Lawrence (No. 3) [2015] UKSC 5022 July 2015 Costs; Article 6, ECHR
Hunt v North Somerset Council [2015] UKSC 5122 July 2015 Judicial review
R (Champion) v North Norfolk District Council [2015] UKSC 5222 July 2015 Planning law; Habitats Directive
Woolway v Mazars [2015] UKSC 5329 July 2015 Hereditament
R (Bourgass) v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] UKSC 5429 July 2015 Prison
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Tolley [2015] UKSC 5529 July 2015 Disability Living Allowance
John Mander Pension Scheme Trustees Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2015] UKSC 5629 July 2015 Pension schemes
R (Tigere) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 5729 July 2015 Student loans
Shahid v Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 5814 October 2015 Article 3, ECHR; Article 8, ECHR
Mandalia v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 5914 October 2015 Immigration law
Sharland v Sharland [3] [2015] UKSC 6014 October 2015 Divorce law
Gohil v Gohil [3] [2015] UKSC 6114 October 2015 Divorce law
R v McGeough [2015] UKSC 6221 October 2015 Evidence
The United States of America v Nolan [2015] UKSC 6321 October 2015 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
JSC BTA Bank v Ablyazov [2015] UKSC 6421 October 2015 Asset freezing
British American Tobacco Denmark A/S v Kazemier Transport BV [2015] UKSC 6528 October 2015 Jurisdiction
Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd. v Menelaou [2015] UKSC 664 November 2015 Unjust enrichment
Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi [3] [2015] UKSC 674 November 2015 Contract law
R (on the application of Ali) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 6818 November 2015 Immigration law
Keyu v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2015] UKSC 6925 November 2015 Judicial review
In the matter of J (a child) [2015] UKSC 7025 November 2015 Hague Convention on Parental Responsibility and Protection of Children; Jurisdiction
Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas plc [2015] UKSC 712 December 2015 Companies Act 2006
Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd [2015] UKSC 722 December 2015 Contract law
R v Harvey [2015] UKSC 7316 December 2015 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002
Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd v The Scottish Ministers [2015] UKSC 7416 December 2015 Planning law
Société Cooperative De Production Seafrance SA v The Competition and Markets Authority [2015] UKSC 7516 December 2015 Mergers and acquisitions
R (on the application of Wang Yam) v Central Criminal Court [3] [2015] UKSC 7616 December 2015 Evidence
Macklin v HM Advocate [3] [2015] UKSC 7716 December 2015 Scottish criminal law
Thevarajah v Riordan [2015] UKSC 7816 December 2015 Debarment
R (on the application of Roberts) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 7917 December 2015 Stop and search

2016 judgments

Case nameCitationDecidedLegal subjectSummary of decision
Mirga v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 1 27 JanuarySocial securityIt was lawful to deny a pregnant Polish woman income support under UK and EU law, and to deny an Iraqi man housing under the Housing Act 1996 .
R (C) v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 2 27 January Anonymity
Youssef v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2016] UKSC 3 27 January Asset freezing
Re B (A Child) [2016] UKSC 4 3 February Jurisdiction; Children Act 1989
R v Taylor [3] [2016] UKSC 5 3 February Criminal law
Kennedy v Cordia (Services) LLP [2016] UKSC 6 10 February Tort law Negligence
Shop Direct Group v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 7 17 February Tax law VAT
R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 18 February Criminal law Joint enterprise
Knauer v Ministry of Justice [3] [2016] UKSC 9 24 February Tort law Mesothelioma; Damages
Cox v Ministry of Justice [2016] UKSC 10 2 March Tort law Vicarious liability
Mr A M Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc [2016] UKSC 11 2 March Tort law Vicarious liability
PMS International Group Plc v Magmatic Ltd [2016] UKSC 12 9 March Intellectual property
DB Group Services Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 13 9 March Tax law
Lynn Shellfish Ltd v Loose [2016] UKSC 14 13 April Land law Fishing industry in England
In the matter of N (Children) [2016] UKSC 15 13 April Conflict of laws Jurisdiction and Brussels II.
R (Nouazli) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 16 20 April Immigration law
Asset Land Investment Plc v The Financial Conduct Authority [2016] UKSC 17 20 April Collective investment schemes
The Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime v Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd [2016] UKSC 18 20 April Tort law The proper scope of compensation under the Riot (Damages) Act 1886 in an insurance policy.
R (O) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 19 27 April False imprisonment
NYK Bulkship (Atlantic) NV v Cargill International SA [2016] UKSC 20 11 May Maritime law
Airtours Holidays Transport Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 21 11 May Tax law VAT
In the matter of an application by JR55 for Judicial Review [2016] UKSC 22 11 May Judicial review
PST Energy 7 Shipping LLC v O W Bunker Malta Ltd [2016] UKSC 23 11 May Maritime law
Eclipse Film Partners No 35 LLP v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 24 11 May Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007
Ministry of Defence v Iraqi Civilians [2016] UKSC 25 12 May Civil Code of Iraq
PJS v News Group Newspapers [2016] UKSC 26 19 May Tort law Privacy law; Injunctions
McBride v Scottish Police Authority [2016] UKSC 27 15 June Labour law Shirley McKie
McDonald v McDonald [2016] UKSC 28 15 June Land law ECHR article 8
BNY Mellon Corporate Trustee Services Ltd v LBG Capital No. 1 Plc [2016] UKSC 29 16 June Banking law
Brown v Stonegale Ltd [2016] UKSC 30 22 June Company law
Taiwo v Olaigbe [2016] UKSC 31 22 June Labour law Equality Act 2010
MP (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 32 22 June Immigration law
MS (Uganda) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 33 22 June Immigration law
In the matter of D (A Child) [2016] UKSC 34 22 June Family law
R (Bancoult (No 2)) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2016] UKSC 35 29 June British Overseas Territories
Goluchowski v District Court in Elblag, Poland [2016] UKSC 36 29 June European Arrest Warrant
R (Ismail) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 37 6 July Serving foreign judgments
Campbell v Gordon [2016] UKSC 38 6 July Labour law Employers' Liability (Compulsory Insurance) Act 1969
R (The Public Law Project) v Lord Chancellor [2016] UKSC 39 13 July Legal aid
Edwards v Kumarasamy [2016] UKSC 40 13 July Land law Landlord–tenant law
Amoena (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2016] UKSC 41 13 July Bras
Patel v Mirza [2016] UKSC 42 20 July Contract law Illegality of contracts
Willers v Joyce (1) [2016] UKSC 43 20 July Tort law Malicious prosecution
Willers v Joyce (2) [2016] UKSC 44 20 July Precedent; Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
Versloot Dredging BV and another v HDI Gerling Industrie Versicherung AG [2016] UKSC 45 20 July Commercial law Marine insurance
Lee-Hirons v Secretary of State for Justice [2016] UKSC 46 27 July Mental health law
Bailey v Angove's PTY Ltd [2016] UKSC 47 27 July Commercial law Law of agency
Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc [2016] UKSC 48 27 July Tort law The deceitful misrepresentation of a workplace injury
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Franco Vomero (Italy) [2016] UKSC 49 27 July Immigration law
Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners Plc [2016] UKSC 50 27 July Hastings Pier
The Christian Institute v The Lord Advocate [2016] UKSC 51 28 July Constitutional law ECHR article 8 and reserved matters
Moreno v The Motor Insurers' Bureau [11] [2016] UKSC 52 3 August Damages
MB v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [11] [2016] UKSC 53 10 August Legal aspects of transgenderism
R (Ingenious Media Holdings plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs) [2016] UKSC 54 19 October Constitutional law ECHR article 8
R v Mitchell [2016] UKSC 55 19 October Bad character evidence
R (Johnson) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 56 19 October Constitutional law Human Rights Act 1998
Impact Funding Solutions Ltd v AIG Europe Insurance Ltd (formerly known as Chartis Insurance (UK) Ltd) [2016] UKSC 57 26 October Contract law
R (Rutherford) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2016] UKSC 58 9 November Under-occupancy penalty
Makhlouf v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland) [2016] UKSC 59 16 November Constitutional law Criminal deportation and ECHR article 8
Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 16 November Criminal deportation; ECHR Article 8
R v Golds [2016] UKSC 61 30 November Criminal law Murder
R v Docherty [2016] UKSC 62 14 December Sentencing
R (Mirza) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 63 14 December Immigration law
Habib Khan v General Pharmaceutical Council [2016] UKSC 64 14 December Professional ethics
R v Guraj [2016] UKSC 65 14 December Confiscation

2017 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
Rahmatullah (No 2) v Ministry of Defence [2017] UKSC 1 17 January Crown Proceedings Act 1947
Abd Ali Hameed Al-Waheed v Ministry of Defence [2017] UKSC 2 17 January Constitutional law Detention
Belhaj v Straw [2017] UKSC 3 17 January International law Act of state doctrine
FirstGroup Plc v Paulley [2017] UKSC 4 18 January Discrimination law A bus company's duty to provide wheelchair space under the Equality Act 2010.
R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 24 January Constitutional law An Act of Parliament, not the Royal Prerogative, was required to send notification under TEU article 50 to negotiate leaving the EU because this would withdraw rights under Acts of Parliament. Decided by 11 judges.
Akers v Samba Financial Group [2017] UKSC 6 1 February Conflict of laws Extinguishing of an equitable interest by transferring legal title to a bona fide purchase for value was not a "disposition" of that equitable interest for the purposes of avoidance under the Insolvency Act 1986.
DB v Chief Constable of Police Service of Northern Ireland [2017] UKSC 7 1 February Constitutional law Bans on processions in Northern Ireland and ECHR article 11.
Re Brewster [2017] UKSC 8 8 February
R (Hicks) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2017] UKSC 9 15 February Constitutional law
R (MM (Lebanon)) v Secretary of State [2017] UKSC 10 22 February
R (Agyarko and Ikuga) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 11 22 February
Homes and Communities Agency v JS Bloor (Wilmslow) Ltd [2017] UKSC 12 22 February
AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier [2017] UKSC 13 1 March
Newbigin (Valuation Officer) v SJ & J Monk [2017] UKSC 14 1 March
EV (A Child), Re (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 15 1 March
IPCO (Nigeria) Ltd v Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation [2017] UKSC 16 1 March
Ilott v The Blue Cross [2017] UKSC 17 15 March
AIG Europe Ltd v Woodman [2017] UKSC 18 22 March
Financial Conduct Authority v Macris [2017] UKSC 19 22 March
Gordon v Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 20 22 March
BPE Solicitors v Hughes-Holland [2017] UKSC 21 22 March
N v ACCG [2017] UKSC 22 22 March
Plevin v Paragon Personal Finance Ltd [2017] UKSC 23 29 March
Wood v Capita Insurance Services Ltd [2017] UKSC 24 29 March
AB v Her Majesty's Advocate [2017] UKSC 25 5 April
Volkswagen Financial Services (UK) Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 26 5 April
Essop v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2017] UKSC 27 5 April Labour law A skills test was indirect discrimination, and claimants need not prove why if there is in fact a disparate impact.
Isle of Wight Council v Platt [2017] UKSC 28 6 April
Revenue and Customs v The Investment Trust Companies [2017] UKSC 29 11 April
SXH v The Crown Prosecution Service [2017] UKSC 30 11 April
McCann v The State Hospitals Board for Scotland [2017] UKSC 31 11 April
Lowick Rose LLP v Swynson Ltd [2017] UKSC 32 11 April
Times Newspapers Ltd v Flood [2017] UKSC 33 11 April
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority v EnergySolutions EU Ltd [2017] UKSC 34 11 April
Gard Marine and Energy Ltd v China National Chartering Company Ltd [2017] UKSC 35 10 May
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea [2017] UKSC 36 10 May
Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd [2017] UKSC 37 10 May
LB Holdings Intermediate 2 Ltd v Lehman Brothers International (Europe) [2017] UKSC 38 17 May Insolvency law
Hartley v King Edward VI College [2017] UKSC 39 24 May Labour law Wage deductions from striking teachers were unlawful by exceeding the proportion of time on strike.
R (Coll) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 40 24 May
R (A and B) v Secretary of State for Health [2017] UKSC 41 14 June
R (Kiarie and Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 42 14 June
Globalia Business Travel SAU of Spain v Fulton Shipping Inc of Panama [2017] UKSC 43 28 June
Lord Advocate v Dean [2017] UKSC 44 28 June
RFC 2012 Plc v Advocate General for Scotland [2017] UKSC 45 5 July
O'Brien v Ministry of Justice [2017] UKSC 46 12 July
Walker v Innospec Ltd [2017] UKSC 47 12 July
Eli Lilly v Actavis UK Ltd [2017] UKSC 48 12 July
PNM v Times Newspapers Ltd & [2017] UKSC 49 19 July
R (Hemming (t/a Simply Pleasure)) v Westminster City Council [2017] UKSC 50 19 July
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 26 July Constitutional law, Labour law The Lord Chancellor's Order imposing £1200 fees to bring Employment Tribunal claims violated the rule of law.
McDonald v Newton or McDonald [2017] UKSC 52 26 July
Birch v Birch [2017] UKSC 53 26 July
Sadovska v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 54 26 July
BPP Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 55 26 July
R (Forge Care Homes Ltd) v Cardiff and Vale University Health Board [2017] UKSC 56 2 August
Goldtrail Travel Ltd v Onur Air Tasimacilik AS [2017] UKSC 57 2 August
R v M [2017] UKSC 58 3 August
MT Hojgaard AS v EON Climate and Renewables UK Robin Rigg East Ltd [2017] UKSC 59 3 August
Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2017] UKSC 60 18 October
Reyes v Al-Malki [2017] UKSC 61 18 October
Benkharbouche v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2017] UKSC 62 18 October Labour law, International law There was no state immunity for breach of employment rights.
Re Loughlin [2017] UKSC 63 18 October
Taurus Petroleum Limited v State Oil Marketing Company of the Ministry of Oil, Republic of Iraq [2017] UKSC 64 25 October
P v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2017] UKSC 65 25 October
Aberdeen City and Shire Strategic Development Planning Authority v Elsick Development Company Limited [2017] UKSC 66 25 October
Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd [2017] UKSC 67 25 October Criminal law The test for fraud is objective.
Mitsui & Co Ltd v Beteiligungsgesellschaft LPG Tankerflotte MBH & Co KG [2017] UKSC 68 25 October
Brown v The Parole Board for Scotland [2017] UKSC 69 1 November Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Act 1998 The duty to afford prisoners a real opportunity for rehabilitation extends beyond those subject to life sentences and includes prisoners serving the extended part of an extended sentence. [12]
Littlewoods Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 70 1 November Tax Law Littlewoods were not entitled on common law grounds to receive compound interest from HMRC on overpaid VAT. The terms of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 exclude common law restitution claims and compound interest and these provisions were not contrary to EU law. [13]
Michalak v General Medical Council [2017] UKSC 71 1 November Judicial Review, Equality Act 2010 A judicial review of conduct relating to a decision by the General Medical Council does not constitute 'proceedings in the nature of appeal' but is instead 'proceedings in which the legality of any decision, to the procedure by which it is reached, is challenge'. As a result, claimants complaining of unlawful discrimination by a qualification body can take the complaint to the Employment Tribunal in all cases unless there is a specific alternative right of appeal. [14]
R (C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 72 1 November Gender Inequality, Gender Recognition Act 2004, Human Rights Act 1998, Equality Act 2010 Policies in the administration the welfare benefits system which retained the birth gender of a person within a person's records were not unlawful in their application to people of reassigned gender. [15]
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2017] UKSC 73 15 November Immigration Law Regulations introduced to exclude persons from eligibility to social security benefits who qualified to reside in the UK solely as a result of the ruling in Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l'emploi were not incompatible with the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights or Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [16]
R (De Silva) v HM Revenue and Customs [2017] UKSC 74 15 November Tax Law, Taxes Management Act 1970 Enquiries made by HMRC into elections made by members of a film partnership, in respect of the utilisation of losses made by that partnership, were valid where the enquiry was made into the partnership return rather than specifically into the claims made by the individuals. [17]
Gordon v Campbell Riddell Breeze Paterson LLP [2017] UKSC 75 15 November Professional negligence, Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 The five year time limits in the Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 meant that a claim involving a professional negligence action against a firm of solicitors could only be made for up to five years from the date on which the client incurred the loss, even if the party did not know that they will have a claim during that period. [18]
Scotch Whisky Association & Ors v The Lord Advocate [2017] UKSC 76 15 November The Alcohol (Minimum Pricing) (Scotland) Act 2012, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union The Scottish government minimum pricing legislation on alcohol was legal and did not conflict with the requirements for 'open and un-distorted competition' guaranteed by the EU free movement principles. [19]
Tiuta International Ltd (in liquidation) v De Villiers Surveyors Ltd [2017] UKSC 77 29 November Professional negligence in English law Where a lender had made a loan to a property developer based on a valuation from a property surveyor which replaced an existing loan made by the same lender, which was based on a previous valuation (for which not claim for negligence was made), then the loss to the lender arising from the second valuation was limited to the additional monies lent under the second loan rather than the whole of the value of the second loan. [20]
O'Connor v Bar Standards Board [2017] UKSC 78 6 December Human Rights Human Rights Act 1998 A barrister who had been charged by the Bar Standards Board for professional misconduct and who had challenged the charge as being a breach of rights under the European Convention on Human Rights was not out of time to make such a challenge. The 12 month time period for making such a claim where there was a continuous course of conduct could start from the end of that continuous period. [21]
Dover District Council v CPRE Kent [2017] UKSC 79 6 December Planning permission in the United Kingdom, The Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Where a local planning authority had granted permission against the advice of its own professional advisers it had a common law duty to provide reasons for the decision. Such a duty also existed in statute under the Town and County Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2011. [22]
Four Seasons Holdings Incorporated v Brownlie [2017] UKSC 80 19 December Tort law The term "damange" should be given its ordinary and natural meaning in considering whether the civil procedure rules allow for proceedings to be brought in the English courts where 'damage was, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction'. Therefore, an indirect loss suffered in England as a result of a tort committed abroad may be sufficient to establish the English court's jurisdiction to hear the claim. [23]
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 81 19 December Smoking ban in England The Crown, in respect of the operations of Her Majesty's Prison Service is not bound by the provisions of the smoking ban in England as express provision to bind the Crown as not made in the Health Act 2006. [24]
R (Hysaj) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 82 21 December British nationality law, British Nationality Act 1981 Misrepresentations made in applications for citizenship render the applicant to be liable to be deprived of citizenship. However, the concept of nullity only applies where a person applies for citizenship by impersonating another real person and does not apply in other cases were a person adopted a false identity. Persons note impersonating another real person will therefore be entitled to the full appeals process. [25] [26]

2018 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
R (Haralambous) v Crown Court at St Albans [2018] UKSC 1 24 January Constitutional law, Search and seizure Closed material procedures could be used in a judicial review of a Crown Court decision and there was no minimum core of material that the government was required to disclose to the other party where such procedures were used. [27]
R (Gibson) v Secretary of State for Justice [2018] UKSC 2 24 January Criminal Law, Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 The calculation of days to be taken of a prison term in respect of payments made towards a fine should be calculated by reference to the original confiscation order and should not include any interest that had accrued on the amount due. [28]
R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2018] UKSC 3 8 February Constitutional law The establishment of a Marine Protected Area around the Chagos Islands was not unlawful. The decision made by David Miliband was made in his capacity as an MP and the Carltona Principle could not be invoked to impute an improper motive on civil servants. [29]
Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2018] UKSC 4 8 February Tort law, Duty of care in English law An elderly lady who was knocked to the ground during the attempted arrest of a drug dealer by police officers was owed a duty of care by the police officers involved. [30]
B (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 5 8 February Immigration law The power to grant bail and impose bail conditions in respect of a person who is held pending deportation ceases to be lawful if there is no legal basis for detaining that person. [31]
The Advocate General for Scotland v Romein [2018] UKSC 6 8 February Immigration law, British nationality law Individuals born outside of the UK to British mothers between 1949 and 1983 can apply to be registered as British citizens, irrespective of whether their birth was registered at a British consulate. [32]
HM Inspector of Health and Safety v Chevron North Sea Limited [2018] UKSC 7 8 February Labour law, Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974 A prohibition notice given under section 22 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 given in respect of corrosion to the stairways of a North Sea oil installation was capable of being appealed. In making the appeal the employer was able to take into account expert evidence produced after the date of the inspection. [33]
In the matter of C (Children) [2018] UKSC 8 14 February Family law, Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Where a child has become habitually resident in England the a mandatory return to Australia could not be invoked under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Where a parent travels temporarily to another state then, should they decide not to return during the temporary period, this may amount of a 'repudiatory retention' for which the courts could order the return of the child. [34]
SM (Algeria) v Entry Clearance Officer, UK Visa Section [2018] UKSC 9 14 FebruaryImmigration lawThe court held that the cases of Sala v SSHD and Khan v SSHD had been wrongly decided. These cases had previously determined that there was no right of appeal against the refusal of an EEA Residence Card for extended family member. A further three questions were referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union in respect of matters relating to the Citizens' Rights Directive. [35]
R (Mott) v Environment Agency [2018] UKSC 10 14 February Constitutional law, land law The court confirmed that the Environment Agency had to pay compensation to Mott for restricting his fishing rights under ECHR Protocol 1, article 1, on the right to property .
Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD [2018] UKSC 11 14 February Tort law, Constitutional law There was a positive obligation on police under ECHR article 3 to investigate women's allegations of rape against cab driver, John Worboys .
Barton v Wright Hassall LLP [2018] UKSC 12 21 February Civil Procedure Rules By a majority decision, the court confirmed that litigants in person should not be granted a special status in civil litigation where they were seeking relief from sanctions for breaching the Civil Procedure Rules. [36]
Steel v NRAM Ltd (formerly NRAM Plc) [2018] UKSC 13 28 February Tort law Following Hedley Byrne and Caparo it was not reasonable to rely on a statement about a floating charge .
Burnden Holdings (UK) Ltd v Fielding [2018] UKSC 14 28 February Trust law, Limitation Act 1980 For the purpose of the Limitation Act 1980 the directors of a company are to be regarded as trustees of company property with the company being regarded as the beneficiary of the trust. Where a distribution in specie was made by the directors acting in this capacity, no period of limitation would apply to a claim brought against the directors. [37]
Iceland Foods Ltd v Berry (Valuation Officer) [2018] UKSC 15 7 March Tax law A supermarket's air handling system was not subject to rates under the Local Government Finance Act 1988 .
Reilly v Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council [2018] UKSC 16 14 March Labour law A headteacher was fairly dismissed for failing to disclose a relationship with a child sex offender .
Re Maguire [2018] UKSC 17 21 March Constitutional law A criminal defendant was not entitled to be represented by a barrister under ECHR article 6 in a second trial when the barrister was being disciplined by the NI Bar Council .
Dryden v Johnson Matthey plc [2018] UKSC 18 21 March Tort law Claimants who were exposed to chlorinated platinum salts, and had a heightened risk of allergy, had suffered an actionable personal injury .
JSC BTA Bank v Khrapunov [2018] UKSC 19 21 March Tort law The tort of conspiracy would be committed by attempts to evade a freezing order .
Morris-Garner v One Step (Support) Ltd [2018] UKSC 20 18 April Contract law Damages for breach of a restrictive covenant should be measured by the economic value of the right that is breached .
Gavin Edmondson Solicitors Ltd v Haven Insurance Company Ltd [2018] UKSC 21 18 April Equitable Lien A court only has the power to intervene to enforce a solicitors expectation of payment where the solicitor had an enforceable claim for costs against his client and the usual method of enforcement of that claim (a solicitor's lien) was defeated by direct payment. Where such circumstances were met and payments were made directly from an insurer to a claimant, the insurer was required to pay the costs that would otherwise have been due to the solicitor. [38]
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood [2018] UKSC 22 25 April 2018 Labour law The notice of dismissal was only effective when an employee actually read a letter .
R v McCool , R v Harkin [2018] UKSC 23 2 May criminal law, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 By a majority verdict, the court held that a confiscation order could not be made under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 in respect of offences which were committed prior to 24 March 2003. However, such orders could be made in respect of offences occurring after 24 March 2003 even where such offences were associated with other offences occurring before that date. [39]
Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd [2018] UKSC 24 16 May Contract law An "entire agreement" clause was binding on a business, so its eviction for rent arrears was lawful despite an alleged oral agreement that it could renegotiate.
R (Gallaher Group Ltd) v Competition and Markets Authority [2018] UKSC 25 16 May Constitutional law The Office of Fair Trading (now CMA) did not act unlawfully by treating different businesses differently in fulfilling its Competition Act 1998 duties.
Navigators Insurance Company Ltd v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA [2018] UKSC 26 22 May Commercial law, insurance law A vessel that was confiscated following an inspection in Venezuela which found cocaine strapped to the vessel's hull did not give the owner the right to claim as a war loss under their war risk insurance. The loss arose from the infringement of customs regulations which was a risk that was expressly excluded from the insurance policy. [40]
Human Rights Commission for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland : Abortion) [2018] UKSC 27 7 June Abortion in the United Kingdom, European Convention on Human Rights, Offences Against the Person Act 1861, Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1945 The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission did not have standing to bring proceedings in respect of whether provisions of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 and Criminal Justice Act (Northern Ireland) 1945 which made it a criminal offence to receive or perform an abortion in Northern Ireland (other than in very limited exceptions) were unlawful as a specific victim had not been identified. Despite the court having no standing to give judgement, a review of the law was recommended. [41]
Cartier International AG v British Telecommunications Plc [2018] UKSC 28 13 June Intellectual property, Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988,An internet service provider that incurs compliance costs tied to website blocking injunctions granted against trademark infringing websites is entitled to be indemnified by the trademark holder against certain costs of implementing and maintaining the blocking order. [42]
Pimlico Plumbers Ltd v Smith [2018] UKSC 29 13 June Labour law A plumber for a firm was a "worker" and entitled to the minimum wage and paid holidays despite a written contract asserting he was "self-employed".
Project Blue Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 30 13 June Tax law, Finance Act 2003 The anti-avoidance provisions of the Finance Act 2003 prevented claim for sub-sale relief in respect of Stamp Duty Land Tax from being effective where the transaction was part of a Ijarah financing arrangement and 'alternative property finance relief' had been claimed by the counter party to the transaction. [43]
JP Whitter (Water Well Engineers) Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 31 13 June Constitutional law, Tax Law HMRC is not required to take into account the consequences to a tax payer when revoking gross payment status in the Construction Industry Scheme under the Finance Act 2004. In particular revoking gross payment status is not incompatible with Article 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [44]
R (Steinfeld and Keidan) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32 27 June Constitutional law, ECHR article 8, ECHR article 14 The provisions of the Civil Partnership Act which only allowed for a civil partnership to be between two persons of the same sex was unlawful as the prohibition of different-sex couples was a breach of Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (prohibition of discrimination) and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to a private and family life). [45]
Belhaj v Director of Public Prosecutions [2018] UKSC 33 4 July Criminal law, Justice and Security Act 2013 A judicial review of a prosecution amounted to criminal proceedings and therefore a closed material procedure (by which the material is disclosed to the court and a special advocate but not the appellants) could not be used as matter was not a civil procedure for which closed material procedures were specifically provided for under the Justice and Security Act 2013. [46]
Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco SA , Guardians of New Zealand Superannuation Fund and others v Novo Banco SA [2018] UKSC 34 4 July Insolvency law, European Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive A loan of $835m made to Banco Espirito Santo in July 2014 was not transferred to Novo Banco following the failure of the former bank. Whilst the loan was governed by English law the banking reorganization was a matter of Portuguese law and the court was bound to recognize the effect of a decision under Portuguese banking law. [47]
Revenue and Customs v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc [2018] UKSC 35 11 July Tax law, Value Added Tax A company was not entitled to the repayment of VAT resulting form a successful reclaim for overpaid VAT from a former member of its VAT group. Instead where VAT had been overpaid by the representative member of the VAT group then only the representative member (or its agent) could make a claim for repayment. [48]
R v Sally Lane and John Letts [2018] UKSC 36 11 July Terrorism financing Terrorism Act 2000 A couple charged with funding terrorism could be guilty of an offence under section 17 of the Terrorism Act 2000 even if they did not actually suspect that their money would be used for terrorist purposes. The test was whether a reasonable person would have "reasonable cause to suspect" the money would be used for such purposes. [49]
Williams v London Borough of Hackney [2018] UKSC 37 18 July Children Act 1989, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights Section 20 of the Children Act 1989 (which allows a local authority to accommodate a child in need who requires accommodation) does not give local authorities any compulsory powers over parents or their children but the accommodation of children under this section may be lawful until such time as the parents make an unequivocal request for the children to be returned. [50]
Mills v Mills [2018] UKSC 38 18 July Family law Maintenance payments due from one former spouse to the other should not be increased where the cost of living of the spouse in receipt of the payments had increased due to a requirement to rents, which arose as a result of financial mismanagement of a lump sum that had previously been paid, which could have been used to acquire a property. [51]
Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 39 25 July Tax law, Advance Corporation Tax, Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 A credit for underlying foreign tax on portfolio dividends should be calculated by reference to the nominal tax rate of the foreign jurisdiction rather than the tax which was actually paid. Compound interest was not due from HMRC to the taxpayer in respect of tax levied in breach of EU law. [52]
James-Bowen & Ors v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2018] UKSC 40 25 July Negligence The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis did not owe a duty of care to officers in respect of safeguarding their economic and reputational interest where the Commissioner issue a public apology and was involved in litigation involving a previous arrest made by those officers. [53]
Owens v Owens [2018] UKSC 41 25 July Family law, Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 Mrs Owens had failed to show that Mr Owns behavior had been sufficiently unreasonable for their marriage to have broken down irretrievably. In the absence of no-fault divorce law in England and Wales the court was therefore not able to grant a divorce to Mrs Owens. [54]
R v Mackinlay [2018] UKSC 42 25 July Campaign finance, Representation of the People Act 1983 In a pre-trial appeal it was confirmed that property, goods, services or facilities transferred to or provided for the use or benefit of a candidate free of charge or at a discount were not required to be authorised by the candidate in order to be treated as election expenses. [55]
Banca Nazionale del Lavoro SPA v Playboy Club London Ltd [2018] UKSC 43 26 July Tort law BNL owed no duty of care to the Playboy Club when BNL gave a reference of creditworthiness to an associated company about a customer who subsequently gambled and lost large amounts of money .
Totel Ltd v Revenue and Customs [2018] UKSC 44 26 July Tax law It did not breach the EU law principle of equivalence to require companies pay their VAT before appealing against an assessment for it, even the same rule does not occur for other UK taxes .
R (Bashir) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 45 30 July Immigration law, United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, Cyprus Act 1960 In an interim judgement it was confirmed that the United Nations Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees applied to the Sovereign Base Areas of Akrotiri and Dhekelia but did not entitle the respondents to be resettled in the UK. Other matters related to the case were left to be decided in future judgements. [56]
An NHS Trust v Y [2018] UKSC 46 30 July Constitutional law It was not necessary to have a court order before withdrawing medical life support, unless there are conflicts of medical or family opinion .
R (AR) v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2018] UKSC 47 30 July Human Rights, Human Rights Act 1998, European Convention on Human Rights The requirement to protect young and vulnerable people outweighed an individual's right to privacy under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights in respect of the ability for a potential employer to obtain an Enhanced Criminal Record Check from the Disclosure and Barring Service and refuse employment as a result of information disclosed in such a check. [57]
Re McLaughlin [2018] UKSC 48 30 August Constitutional law The requirement to be married or a civil partner, as opposed to cohabiting, to get benefits when a partner dies was incompatible with ECHR article 14.
Lee v Ashers Baking Company Ltd and others [2018] UKSC 49 10 October Constitutional law There was no right to require a baker to write a pro-gay marriage message on a cake, under ECHR article 9 and 10, when the bakers' personal religious views opposed this .
Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust [2018] UKSC 50 10 October Tort law The NHS trust breached a duty of care by failing to see a patient promptly at A&E and properly advising on waiting times .
Nottingham City Council v Parr [2018] UKSC 51 10 October Land law, Housing Act 2004 The Housing Act 2004 allowed for a licence of a house in multiple occupation to limit occupation to a particular class of person (in this case students in full-time education). [58]
Warner v Scapa Flow Charters [2018] UKSC 52 17 October Commercial law, Limitation Periods The Prescription and Limitation (Scotland) Act 1973 had the effect of suspending the limitation period under the Athens Convention relating to the Carriage of Passengers and their Luggage by Sea. As such, individuals perusing claims in Scotland could have three years to make a claim rather than the two years stated in the Athens Convention. [59]
KO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department , IT (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department , NS (Sri Lanka) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department , Pereira (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2018] UKSC 53 24 October Immigration law, Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 Misconduct by parents of a child should not form part of the assessment in determining whether a child should be removed from the UK under immigration law. Such misconduct should also not form part of the assessment as to whether Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights requires that the parent remain in the UK with the child. [60]
Dooneen Ltd (t/a McGinness Associates) v Mond [2018] UKSC 54 31 October Trust law, Bankruptcy (Scotland) Act 1985 A payment protection insurance claim discovered after a former trustee has made a final dividend will re-vest in the debtor and the termination of the trust has the effect of discharging the debtor and re-investing in the debtor with the trust beneficiaries. [61]
Barnardo's v Buckinghamshire [2018] UKSC 55 7 November Pensions, Trust Law The trustees of a pension scheme for the benefit of staff of Barnardo's were not entitled to replace the Retail Price Index with the Consumer Price Index in calculating increases in pension payments. The specific wording of the pension scheme rules prevented such a change from being made. [62]
Warner-Lambert Company LLC v Generics (UK) Ltd [2018] UKSC 56 14 November Patent Law, Patents Act 1977, European Patent Convention Patents registered by Warner–Lambert did not meeting the appropriate test for plausibility and where therefore invalid for insufficiency but gave conflicting opinions on a number of other matters of patent law. [63]
Regency Villas Title Ltd v Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd [2018] UKSC 57 14 November Property Law, Easement Comprehensive rights granted to timeshare owners to use any enjoy sporting facilities (including indoor areas) in an adjacent leisure park satisfied the characteristics of easements and could be enforced by the timeshare owners. [64]
Rhuppiah v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2018] UKSC 58 14 November Immigration law, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Act 1998, Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 Anyone who, not being a UK citizen, has the right to reside in the UK but does not have the right to do so indefinitely, has a precarious status for the purpose of section 117B of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [65]
R (on the application of Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice [2018] UKSC 59 28 November Criminal Justice Act 2003, Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights The extended determinate sentences scheme does not breach Article 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights, read with Article 5. The differing treatment of EDS prisoners in relation to early release is within the scope of Article 14 on the grounds of "other status". [66]
Secretary of State for Justice v MM [2018] UKSC 60 28 November Mental Health Act 1983, Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights Where a person is hospitalised on mental health grounds, neither the Secretary of State nor the Mental Health Tribunal are able to impost conditions on discharge which would amount to a deprivation of the patient's liberty. [67]
Volcafe Ltd v Compania Sud Americana De Vapores SA [2018] UK SC 61 5 December Shipping Law, Hague Rules Where cargo was shipped in good condition by was discharged damaged the burden of proof was on the carrier to who that it did not beach it obligations under the Hague Rules to take reasonable care of the goods. Where negligence is to be considered then the burden of proof was on the cargo owner to show that the carrier was negligent. [68]
S Franses Limited v The Cavendish Hotel (London) Ltd [2018] UKSC 62 5 December Property Law, Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 A landlord could not oppose the grant of a new tenancy under the provisions of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, which allow for new tenancies to be denied on redevelopment grounds, where the works that the landlord intended to carry out have no purpose other than to remove the tenant and would not be done had the tenant left voluntarily. [69]
London Borough of Southwark v Transport for London [2018] UKSC 63 5 December Property Law Where roads had been transferred from individual London borough councils to the Greater London Authority under the GLA Roads and Side Roads (Transfer of Property etc) Order 2000, the effect of the order was to include the entire vertical plane (i.e. all the airspace above and the subsoil below the surface of the road). [70]
The UK Withdrawal From the European Union (Legal Continuity) (Scotland) Bill - A Reference by the Attorney General and the Advocate General for Scotland[2018] UKSC 64 13 December Brexit, Constitutional Law A bill in the Scottish Parliament which had been drafted as an alternative to the EU Withdrawal Bill was (other than in section of one section) within the jurisdiction of the Scottish Parliament. However, subsequent legislation passes by the Parliament of the United Kingdom rendered a further 21 sections invalid. [71]
Williams v The Trustees of Swansea University Pension and Assurance Scheme [2018] UKSC 65 17 December Anti-discrimination law Equality Act 2010 An individual with a disability has not suffered any unfavorable treatment where an enhancement to his pension was based on the individual's part-time salary at the time of retirement for ill-health rather than a full-time salary as, when considered overall, his pension terms were more favorable than those of an able bodied person. [72]
Welsh Ministers v PJ [2018] UKSC 66 17 December Mental Health Act 1983, Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights Community Treatment Orders under the Mental Health Act 1983 cannot be imposed where effect of the order would have the effect of a deprivation of liberty contrary to article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [73]
UKI (Kingsway) Limited v Westminster City Council [2018] UKSC 67 17 December Property Law, Business Rates, Local Government Finance Act 1988 A "completion notice" issued by Westminster City Council which did not identify the property owner, which was left with owner's agents and was subsequently scanned and emailed to the property owner had been validly served. The Electronic Communications Act 2000 allowed for such noticed to be received by email. [74]

2019 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland of devolution issues to the Supreme Court pursuant to Paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 (No 2) [2019] UKSC 1 14 January Constitutional law, Devolution in the UK
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice and R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice [2019] UKSC 2 30 January Criminal law Applicants were not entitled to compensation under section 133 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 for criminal convictions which were subsequently quashed for being unsafe. [75]
R (P) v Secretary of State for the Home Department , R (P, G and W) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Re Lorraine Gallagher for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2019] UKSC3 30 January Labour Law, Human rights Held that the requirement for spent minor criminal convictions to be disclosed to potential employers under the multiple convictions rules is incompatible with Article 8 ECHR [76]
Wells v Devani [2019] UKSC 4 13 February Contract Law, Estate Agents Act 1979 A binding contract for the payment of commission had been made between an estate agent and property owner despite the absence of a written contract. Amount of commission reduced as a result of the estate agent breaching Estate Agents Act 1979 s 18 requiring certain terms to be explained to a vendor. [77]
Perry v Raleys Solicitors [2019] UKSC 5 13 February Tort law, Professional negligence In considering whether professional negligence was the cause of a loss where the negligence consisted of a potential lost litigation opportunity it was necessary to consider, on the balance of the probabilities, where such litigation would have been undertaken if non-negligently advised and whether such litigation would have been successful. [78] [79]
Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd [2019] UKSC 6 20 February Tort law, insurance law, Road Traffic Act 1988 The Court concluded that a person, who is not just anonymous but cannot be identified, cannot be sued under a pseudonym or description and as such an insurer cannot be held liable for a claim under Part VI of the Road Traffic Act 1988 where the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident cannot be identified. [80]
In the matter of an application by Geraldine Finucane for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2019] UKSC 7 27 February Constitutional law, Public inquiry, Article 2 of the ECHR It was lawful for the government to have refused to hold a public inquiry into the murder of human rights lawyer but the fact that an appropriate inquiry had not taken place breached Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the right to life). [81]
Konecny v District Court in Brno-Venkov, Czech Republic [2019] UKSC 8 27 February Human rights, European Arrest Warrant, Extradition Act 2003, Article 8 of the ECHR The appeal of an individual against extradition under a European Arrest Warrant was dismissed on the basis that the individual was a convicted person despite having an unequivocal right to a retrial after surrender. The court also dismissed that the passage of time prevented extradition under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [82]
In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2019] UKSC 9 6 March Human rights, Human Rights Act 1998 Article 2 of the ECHR The court allowed an appeal against a stay on the award of damages under the Human Rights Act 1998 s 8 for breach of Article 2 of the ECHR confirming that a claim for damages can run concurrently with an inquest. [83]
KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 10 6 March Immigration law, Right of asylum, Istanbul Protocol An assessment by a medical expert which referred to the consistency of the clinical findings to the statements by the applicant were not beyond the remit of an expert and were in accordance with the Istanbul Protocol. When considering the likelihood that injuries are self inflicted by proxy (SIBP) rather than torture considerable weight should be given to the fact that such injuries which are SIBP are extremely rare. [84]
Robinson (formerly JR (Jamaica)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 11 13 March Immigration Law, Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 A second human rights claim in an immigration case did automatically trigger a right of appeal once the rights to appeal on an original claim had been exhausted. [85]
HMRC v Joint Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) [2019] UKSC 12 13 March 2019 Tax Law Statutory interest paid under the Insolvency Rules 2016 is considered to be yearly interest and therefore subject to a deduction of tax at source under the provisions of the Income Tax Act 2007 [86]
Takhar v Gracefield Developments Limited [2019] UKSC 13 20 March 2019 Criminal law, Fraud Where on original judgement has been obtained by reason of the fraudulent conduct of a party and an allegation of fraud has not been raised in the original judgement then it is not necessary for the defrauded party to show that the fraud would have been spotted with reasonable diligence in order for the case to proceed to trial. [87]
SAE Education Ltd v HMRC [2019] UKSC 14 20 March Tax Law, VAT, Value Added Tax Act 1994 A commercial provider of university education which did not in itself hold degree awarding powers but collaborated with UK universities to award degrees could be considered to be a "college of a university" for the purpose of exemption from VAT. [88]
Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation [2019] UKSC 15 27 March Intellectual property, Patent Law, Patents Act 1977, European Patent Convention The Court of Appeal was within its powers to interfere with the decision in the High Court in assessing whether dosage testing was obvious and therefore the patent was invalid for lack of an inventive test. [89]
R&S Pilling t/a Phoenix Engineering v UK Insurance Ltd [2019] UKSC 16 27 March Tort law, insurance law, Road Traffic Act 1988 An insurer was not liable for a fire occurring on private land arising from the insured vehicle where the vehicle was not, at the time, being used as a means of transportation. The Road Traffic Act 1988 s 143 was incompatible with EU law. [90]
Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 3 April Tort law, English defamation law, Defamation Act 1952 An allegation that he "tried to strangle me" on Facebook did not constitute defamation even if the person making the allegation could not demonstrate that he has actually intended to kill her. Context should be given to the nature of spontaneous social media posts when interpreting their meaning. [91]
R (Newby Foods Ltd) v Food Standards Agency [2019] UKSC 18 3 April EU law, Food Safety Meat remaining on an animal carcass after it has been mechanically butchered which is subsequently removed from that carcass using a mechanical process was mechanically separated meat under EU law and therefore subject to the specific hygiene requirements of EU regulation no 853/2004. [92]
R (Derry) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2019] UKSC 19 10 April Tax Law, Income Tax Act 2007 HM Revenue & Customs has not followed the correct process into raising an inquiry into a claim for share loss relief by the taxpayer and therefore were out of time to challenge the loss relief claimed by the taxpayer. [93]
Lungowe v Vedanta Resources plc [2019] UKSC 20 10 April Company Law, Tort Law, Conflict of laws A number of Zambian citizens were entitled to be a group action in the UK courts against Vedanta Resources PLC in respect of alleged harm to the health and farming resources arising from the Nchanga Copper Mine which was operated by a Zambian subsidiary of Vedanta Resources (Konkola Copper Mines). [94]
R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions , R (DS) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 21 15 May Human rights, Article 14 of the ECHR, Housing Benefit, Welfare Reform Act 2012 The revised lower benefit cap in respect of eligibility for Housing Benefit did not discriminate against lone parents, or lone parents with children under school age, and was therefore considered to be lawful. [95]
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2019] UKSC 22 15 May Constitutional law, Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 By majority decision the court held decisions of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal could be subject to judicial review in the High Court and implied that parliament may not use legislation to "oust" the jurisdiction of the courts to undertake judicial review. [96]
Telereal Trillium v Hewitt (Valuation Officer) [2019] UKSC 23 15 May Tax law, Business rates in England, Valuation In considering the rateable value of a premises in a saturated market the valuation hypothesis must assume there remains a willing tenant who is interested in renting the building with the amount of such rent being determined by reference to the general demand derived from similar premises. [97]
Hancock v HMRC [2019] UKSC 24 22 May Tax Law, Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 The cash redemption of loan notes were the redemption of qualifying corporate bonds and therefore a gain subject to tax under the provisions of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 was crystallized on the redemption of the bonds. [98]
Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25 6 June Tort law, Negligence, Vicarious Liability, Children Act 1989 Poole Borough Council had not breached their duty of care in respect of children placed in local authority housing where the children had been subject to harassment and abuse by neighbours. The court found that X v Bedfordshire CC was no longer good law. [99]
In the matter of an application by Dennis Hutchings for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2019] UKSC 26 6 June Constitutional law, Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007, non-jury trial The Director of Public Prosecutions for Northern Ireland was entitled to file a certificate under the Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007 for a former British Army soldier to be tried in a Diplock court by a judge alone (without a jury) in respect of a killing made by the soldier during the Troubles [100]
Lachaux v Independent Print Ltd [2019] UKSC 27 12 June Tort law, Defamation, Defamation Act 2013 The court ruled that section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013 imposed a new threshold over the common law interpretation of defamation, being that the harm caused had to be serious. It was found that the damage to reputation of the individual in this case did not cause serious harm. [101]
Samuels v Birmingham City Council [2019] UKSC 28 12 June Administrative law, Housing Benefit, Housing Act 1996 An individual had not made herself intentionally homeless due to failing to pay her rent since her income had been less than her reasonable living expenses when living in her last settled accommodation. [102]
Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) v Connect Shipping Inc [2019] UKSC 29 12 June Tort law, insurance law, Marine Insurance Act 1906 Under the Marine Insurance Act 1906 a ship is a total loss if the costs of repairing the damage exceed the value of the ship. It was held that the costs of repair should include all reasonable costs of salving and safeguarding the ship but would exclude Special Compensation, Protection and Indemnity Clause (SCOPIC) costs. [103]
OWD Ltd t/a Birmingham Cash and Carry v HMRC [2019] UKSC 30 19 June Tax Law, Alcohol Duties Liquor Act 1979, Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 HMRC does not have the power under the Alcohol Duties Liquor Act 1979 or Commissioners for Revenue and Customs Act 2005 to permit temporary trading in respect of wholesale supplies of alcohol pending an appeal against a refusal to grant approval for such trading under the Alcohol Wholesalers Registration Scheme. [104]
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Gubeladze [2019] UKSC 31 19 June EU law, Proportionality, Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006, Citizens' Rights Directive An individual was entitled to Pension Credit despite having not been registered for three years under the United Kingdom EU Worker Registration Scheme and that the extension to the registration scheme in 2008 was not proportionate as they only gave small and speculative benefits but could have substantial and series effects on individuals. [105]
Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd [2019] UKSC 32 3 July Labour law, Contract law, Restrictive covenants,A restrictive covenant in an employment contract which prevented the employee from holding any shareholding (of any size) in a competitor following cessation of employment was too broad and was therefore unenforceable. This part of the clause was required to be severed from the covenants. [106]
London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government [2019] UKSC 33 3 July Land law, Planning Law, Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Where planning permission had been granted for retail development subject to restrictions and a subsequent application was made to modify or remove an existing restriction then, even if the subsequent planning permission does not include specific restrictions, this does not necessarily mean there are no restrictions. [107]
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM [2019] UKSC 34 18 July Administrative law, Welfare Reform Act 2012, Social Security (Personal Independence Payment) Regulations 2013 A benefit claimed was entitled to claim personal independence payment partly on the basis that they needed support to engage with other people because of mental health problems. The government's narrow and technical view of the scope of the regulations was rejected. [108]
Secretary of State for the Home Department v Franco Vomero (Italy) [2019] UKSC 35 24 July EU law, Citizens' Rights Directive, Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006 An individual had not acquire a right of permanent residence and was prevented from acquiring such a right following the adoption of the Citizens' Rights Directive by virtue of serious criminal convictions. (Following referral of questions to the European Court of Justice). [109]
R (Association of Independent Meat Suppliers) v Food Standards Agency [2019] UKSC 36 24 July EU law, Food Safety, Food Safety Act 1990, Food Safety and Hygiene (England) Regulations 2013 The court made no decision and referred two questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union being
a) Do EU regulations (Nos 854/2004 and 882/2004 preclude certain procedures undertaken pursuant to the Food Safety Act 1990, and
b) Whether EU regulation 882/2004 mandates a right of appeal against decisions of Official Veterinarians. [110]
X v Kuoni Travel Ltd [2019] UKSC 37 24 July Contract Law, Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations 1992 In respect of whether a tour operator was liable for damages for a breach of contract where a hotel guest was sexually assaulted the court referred the questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union on the Package Holiday Directive 90/314/EEC. [111]
Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring (for and on behalf of Asbestos Victims Support Groups Forum UK) [2019] UKSC 38 29 July Administrative law, Civil Procedure Rules A person who is not a party to court proceedings may obtain a number of documents that are held in count during proceedings but does not necessarily have a right to every document. The constitutional principle of open justice may require access to be given to further documents than those that are permitted by right under the Civil Procedure Rules. [112]
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Frank A Smart & Son Ltd [2019] UKSC 39 29 July Tax law, Value Added Tax The taxpayer was entitled to recover input VAT under the Principal VAT Directive on costs incurred in respect of the purchase of single farm payment entitlements with the key testing on whether recovery was available being how the subsidy was to be used by the business. [113]
Akçilv Koza Ltd [2019] UKSC 40 29 July Company law, Conflict of laws, Legal Jurisdiction, Brussels I Recast Regulation The English courts did not have jurisdiction in respect of a claim brought by trustee shareholders of Koza Altın (a Turkish company) over changes made to the constitutional documents of a UK subsidiary. Whether the Turkish parent had acted validly was a matter for the Turkish Courts. [114]
R (Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry v Advocate General for Scotland [2019] UKSC 41 24 September Constitutional law The Prime Minister's advice to Her Majesty to exercise the prerogative power to prorogue Parliament was unlawful as it prevented Parliament from exercising its constitutional functions, and the resulting prorogation was thus void and of no effect. Decided by 11 judges. [115]
In the matter of D (A Child) [2019] UKSC 42 26 September Constitutional law, Liberty, Children Act 1989, Article 5 of the ECHR, Article 8 of the ECHR Where a 16 or 17 year old lacks capacity to give their own consent, it is not possible for the parents of the individual to give consent to living arrangements which would amount to a deprivation of liberty. Instead an application must be made under the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards regime. [116]
Routier v HMRC [2019] UKSC 43 16 October Tax law, Inheritance Tax Act 1984 The restriction in the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 for exemptions of legacies to charities to UK charities violated the EU law principle of the freedom of movement of capital. [117]
Gilham v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 44 16 October Labour law, Employment Rights Act 1996, Article 10, ECHR, Article 14, ECHR A district judge was entitled to whistleblower protections by virtue of being a 'worker' despite not being an employee under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Failure to offer such protection would interfere with the right to freedom of expression, protected under Article 10, ECHR. [118]
Shanks v Unilever Plc [2019] UKSC 45 23 October Intellectual property, Patent Law, Patents Act 1977 The system for measuring glucose concentration by an employee of Unilever had provided an outstanding benefit to the company and the employee was entitled to a fair share of that benefit. [119]
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd (Formerly General Motors UK Ltd) [2019] UKSC 46 23 October Land law, Equitable Relief from Forfeiture Relief from forfeiture can be given in respect of possessory rights over land where the contract grants either proprietary or possessory rights over land and the termination provision was included in the contract as security of the payment of a sum. [120]
Sequent Nominees Ltd v Hautford Ltd [2019] UKSC 47 30 October Land law, Leasehold Reform Act 1967 A landlord had not unreasonably refused consent for a tenant to apply for planning permission where refusing to grant such consent was an additional safeguard to protect the landlord against the risk of enfranchisement under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 [121]
Travelers Insurance Company Ltd v XYZ [2019] UKSC 48 30 October Administrative law, costs in English law, insurance law, Senior Courts Act 1981 An insurance company which was not a party to the original case but was the insurer of one of the parties was not liable for costs under section 51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981 where it did not engage in 'unjustified intermeddling'. [122]
In the matter of NY (A Child) [2019] UKSC 49 30 October Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Child Abduction and Custody Act 1985 An appeal under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction by the Court of Appeal of England and Wales was set aside. [123]
Singularis Holdings Ltd (In Official Liquidation) (A Company Incorporated in the Cayman Islands) v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe Ltd [2019] UKSC 50 30 October Tort law, Duty of Care, Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 A bank which executes a fraudulent instruction to transfer funds out of a company's account can be held as liable for a breach of its duty of care even if the instruction to transfer the money was made by the controlling shareholders and directors of the company. [124]
R v Reeves Taylor [2019] UKSC 51 13 November Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, Criminal Appeal Act 1968 In order for a person to be guilty of torture under section 134 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 the defendant must be acting in an official capacity for a regime or government and the regime must have some kind of control over the area in which the alleged crime took place. [125]
RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 13 November Human rights, Housing Benefit, Housing Benefit Regulations 2006, Housing Benefit and Universal Credit (Size Criteria) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2017 Housing benefit should be calculated without deduction of the 'bedroom tax'. Following R (Carmichael) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, making such a deduction would be incompatible with Article 14 of the ECHR and a public authority would be required to disregard a legislative provision where its application would result in a breach of the convention. [126]
R (Wright) v Resilient Energy Severndale Ltd and Forest of Dean District Council [2019] UKSC 53 20 November Land law, Planning Law, Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 Local authorities must expressly satisfy the Newbury Principles when granting planning permission. In order for consideration to be 'material' it must be for a planning purpose and not an ulterior purpose and be both fair and reasonable in relation to the development. Upholds the wider principle that planning permission cannot be bought or sold. [127]
Edwards on behalf of the Estate of the late Thomas Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors [2019] UKSC 54 20 November Tort law, Professional Negligence The Bwllfa principle was not relevant to the after date evidence that had been provided to the court and the case was remitted back to the lower courts to determine the value of the loss of opportunity. [128]
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti [2019] UKSC 55 27 November Labour law, Employment Rights Act 1996, Whistleblowing If an employee is dismissed by virtue of a false reason given to the person responsible for making the dismissal then, even if the person responsible has a genuine belief in the false reason, then the actual reason for dismissal is in face the hidden reason that was not disclosed to the decision maker. [129]
R (Hemmati) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 56 27 November Immigration law, Illegal immigration, Right of asylum The policy to detain persons who had sought asylum in another EU State where the claims were referred to an EU State under the Dublin III Regulation under the Immigration Act 1971 failed to comply with the Dublin III Regulation as it lacked adequate certainty and predictability. [130]
MacDonald v Carnbroe Estates Ltd [2019] UKSC 57 4 December Insolvency law, Gratuitous alienations on insolvency, Insolvency Act 1986 Where a property had been sold for £550,000 but only £470,000 had been paid and a higher price could have been achieved with a proper marketing process then there had been a gratuitous alienation prior to insolvency. In considering the available remedy, a flexible approach can be taken to take account of the consideration which a bona fide purchaser would have paid. [131]
R (Lancashire County Council) v Secretary of State for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs , R (NHS Property Services Ltd) v Surrey County Council [2019] UKSC 58 11 December Land law, Statutory Incompatibility The specific public interest contained in the statutory purpose for which the land was actually held outweighed the public interest in registering the land as a town or village green under the Commons Act 2006. [132]
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department , Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah [2019] UKSC 59 16 December Immigration Law, Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006, TFEU, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU The Zambrano principle applied to allow a parent of a dependent child who was a resident to a non EU member state to reside in the UK as the primary carer of a British citizen but did not provide the same rights for another individual in respect of their elderly parent as there was not a 'relationship of dependency'. [133]
Miller v Ministry of Justice [2019] UKSC 60 16 December Labour law, Part-time Work Directive 1997, Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 Judges who had held one or more appointments as fee-paid part-time judges had been subject to less favourable treatment in respect of the provision of a pension and were entitled to pensions in respect of their former part-time service. [134]

2020 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
FMX Foods Merchants Import Export Co Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs [2020] UKSC 1 29 January Tax law, Customs Code of the EU HMRC could issue a post-clearance demand (in respect of customs duty) after the expiry of the normal three year time limit where criminal proceedings were relevant. However, HMRC cannot issue demands unitarily without any time limit as this would be in breach of the fundamental principle of legal certainty under EU law. [135]
A Reference by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland of devolution issues to the Supreme Court pursuant to Paragraph 34 of Schedule 10 to the Northern Ireland Act 1998 [2020] UKSC 2 5 February Constitutional law, Devolution in the UK Providing postcode lists to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions was not a "devolution issue" or capable of being incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Therefore, the Supreme Court refused to accept the application by the Attorney General for Northern Ireland. [136]
R (on the application of Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v North Yorkshire County Council [2020] UKSC 3 5 February Land law, Planning Law, Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Planning permission granted by North Yorkshire County Council for the expansion of a quarry did not breech the National Planning Policy Framework in respect of mineral extraction in the green belt as the "openness" of the green belt would be preserved. [137]
R (on the application of Jalloh (Liberia)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 4 12 February Immigration law, false imprisonment Conditions of bail under the provisions of the Immigration Act 1971 which required an individual who lacked immigration status to stay at home for eight hours a day constituted false imprisonment. [138]
Micula v Romania [2020] UKSC 5 19 February International law, Arbitration The English courts have the power to stay execution of an award by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) and the UK's enforforcement of obligations under and the ICSID Convention are unaffected by the EU Treaties. [139]
In the matter of an application by Deborah McGuinness for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2020] UKSC 6 19 February Administrative law, Jurisdiction The supreme court did not have the jurisdiction to hear appeals in respect of when Ulster loyalist Michael Stone can be released from prison. [140]
R (on the application of DN (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 7 26 February Immigration law, false imprisonment An order to detain and individual prior to deportation under the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 was unlawful and the individual could sue for damages for false imprisonment. [141]
R v Copeland [2020] UKSC 8 11 March Criminal law, Explosive Substances Act 1883 A person was not guilty under section 4(1) of the Explosive Substances Act 1883 where the explosives were being used for experimentation and self-education and did not have an ulterior unlawful purpose. [142]
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2019] UKSC 9 18 March Human rights, Human Trafficking, Modern Slavery Immigration tribunals can make findings of fact and are not bound by a Home Office decision in determining whether Article 4 of the ECHR would be breached. The Council of Europe Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings requirements can form part of the positive obligations owed by the State under Article 4 of the European Convention. [143]
Elgizouli v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 10 25 March Human Rights, Death Penalty, Data Protection Act 2018 A decision by the government to co-operate with US law enforcement over the prosecution was two alleged Islamic State members was unlawful without assurance from the US that the individuals would not face the death penalty. [144]
Aspen Underwriting Ltd v Credit Europe Bank NV [2020] UKSC 11 1 April Conflicts of laws, insurance law, Jurisdiction The High Court of England and Wales did not have jurisdiction to hear claims relating to fraudulent misrepresentation following the loss of an insured vessel. Since Credit Europe Bank was domiciled in the Netherlands, the case should be heard in the courts of the Netherlands. [145]
WM Morrisons Supermarkets plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 12 1 April Tort law, Vicarious Liability, Data Protection Morrisons were not vicariously liable in respect of actions taken by a vengeful employee who posted the personal data of 100,000 employees online, an action which was in breach of duties imposed the by Data Protection Act 1998. [146] [147]
Barclays Bank plc v Various Claimants [2020] UKSC 13 1 April Tort law, Vicarious Liability Barclays Bank PLC was not vicariously liable for the acts of a self-employed doctor who was engaged to carry out medical examinations of its staff and was accused of sexual assault. [148]
Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14 1 April Tort Law, medical negligence Damages payable by Whittington Hospital NHS Trust to a woman who could not bear children following earlier medical negligence could include the costs of surrogacy through commercial agreements abroad. [149]
Zipvit Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2020] UKSC 15 1 April Tax Law, Value Added Tax The court referred a case relating to whether a trader can deduct input VAT in the absence of a VAT invoice and whether a trader has an entitlement to deduct VAT on supplies which are carried out by another entity to the Court of Justice of the European Union [150]
R (Palestine Solidarity Campaign Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2020] UKSC 16 29 April Labour law, Pensions, Public Service Pensions Act 2013 Ministerial guidance to administering authorities of Local Government Pension Scheme funds on how to discharge their investment powers was unlawful as the Public Service Pensions Act 2013 did not allow central government to impose policy on administering authorities. [151]
AM (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 17 29 April Human rights, Criminal deportation, Article 3 of the ECHR The deportation of an individual who had come to the UK as a teenager from Zimbabwe and was subsequently convicted of a number of serious offences was blocked amid concerns his life would be shortened by HIV and suitable medical care was not available in Zimbabwe. This upheld the position established in Paposhvili v Belgium. [152]
Duval v 11-13 Randolph Crescent Ltd [2020] UKSC 18 6 May Land law A landlord was in breach of its obligations to enforce tenant covenants where the landlord had granted a licence to a tenant to undertake structural works as the granting of such a licence had put the landlord out of its power to enforce an absolute covenant preventing structural works. [153]
R v Adams (Northern Ireland)[2020] UKSC 19 13 May Unlawful Detention, Detention of Terrorists (Northern Ireland) Order 1972 The detention of Gerry Adams for his attempts to escape from the Maze Prison in the 1970s was unlawful as the custody order had not been authorised personally by the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland and therefore did not meet the requirements of the Detention of Terrorists (Northern Ireland) Order 1972. [154]
Dill v Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government and another [2020] UKSC 20 20 May Land law, Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 The status of two lead urns placed on limestone plinths which had been classified as listed buildings were able to be revisited by a planning inspector in considering whether or not they were in face 'buildings'. [155]
Cardtronics UK Ltd v Sykes (Valuation Officers) [2020] UKSC 21 20 May Tax Law, Business Rates Cash machines located inside and outside of retail stores were not separate hereditaments from the stores or shops and as such should not have been subject to separate business rates on top of normal store rates. [156]
Fowler v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2020] UKSC 22 20 May Tax Law, Income tax, Labour law Despite the presence of a deeming provision in the Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005 which treated a deep-sea diver as being self-employed for UK tax purposes, the actual relationship was that of employment and the diver should be considered to receive the income in respect of an employment when applying the tax treaty between the UK and South Africa. [157]
Serafin v Malkiewicz [2020] UKSC 23 3 June Tort law, Libel A libel case was overturned after the court found that Justice Robert Jay had not allowed a claim to be properly presented. Further, he had harassed and intimidated the claimant therefore the original trial was unfair. A retrial was ordered. [158]
Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v Visa Europe Services LLC and Sainsbury's Supermarkets Ltd v MasterCard Incorporated [2020] UKSC 24 19 June Competition Law, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union Interchange fees levied by Visa Inc. and Mastercard infringed Competition Law (namely article 101(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union). The judgement could have significant implications with potentially billions in damages being due. [159]
Bresco Electrical Services Ltd (in liquidation) v Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Ltd [2020] UKSC 25 17 June Insolvency law, Adjudication Adjudication on the application of a liquidator of a company is not incompatible with the insolvency process and the existence of the insolvency set-off does not result in a claim ceasing to exist. The fact that an adjudication award cannot be enforced immediately does not mean that the adjudication process is futile. [160]
ABC v Principal Reporter and another and In the matter of XY [2020] UKSC 26 18 June Human rights, Children's Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011, Article 6 of the ECHR, Article 8 of the ECHR It is not a breach of the right to family life for a child's siblings to be denied "relevant person" status (being a person who has had significant involvement in the upbringing of the child and is therefore entitled to be notified of and attend any children's hearing). [161]
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc v Kymab Ltd [2020] UKSC 27 24 June Intellectual property, Patent Law, European Patent Convention The claims by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc in respect of patents registered for a new type of genetically modified mouse which included a hybrid version of the gene that produces antibodies was invalid as the patents failed to adhere to the rule of sufficiency (being that documents filed with the patent need to be detailed enough to enable scientifically skilled readers to recreate the invention). [162]
HMRC v K E Entertainments Ltd [2020] UKSC 28 24 June Tax Law, Value Added Tax, Value Added Tax Regulations 1995 A change in calculating a price apportionment for a bingo promoter between the stake (outside of the scope of VAT) and a participation fee (subject to VAT) did not result in a decrease in the total consideration that enabled the taxpayer to claim a VAT adjustment under the Value Added Tax Regulations 1995. [163]
R v Hilton [2020] UKSC 29 1 July Criminal law, Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 There is no automatic right for third party with an interest in property to make representations at the first stage confiscation proceedings in respect of that property under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 where such representations could be made later at the enforcement stage. [164]
Villiers v Villiers [2020] UKSC 30 1 July Family law, Jurisdiction, Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 A maintenance claim could be pursued in England, where the claimant was now residing, rather than Scotland, despite the fact that the petition for divorce was filed in Scotland and the couple had lived in Scotland for most of their marriage. It was considered that the judgement might encourage 'divorce tourism' where differing settlements arise under English Law and Scots Law. [165]
Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd [2020] UKSC 31 15 July Company law, Tort Law, Reflective loss The reflective loss principle should be strictly limited to cases where claims are brought by a shareholder in respect of a loss suffered by in their capacity as a shareholder and should not apply to claims by creditors. [166]
Sutherland v Her Majesty's Advocate [2020] UKSC 32 15 July Human Rights, Article 8 of the ECHR A covert investigation by paedophile hunters and the use by authorities of evidence collected from this investigation did not breach an individual's right to a private life under Article 8 of the ECHR. [167]
Lehtimaki and others v Cooper [2020] UKSC 33 29 July Company law, Trust Law, Charity Law The courts were able to dictate to the directors of The Children's Investment Fund Foundation, a charitable company, in how to exercise their powers absent a breach of fiduciary duty. [168]
Shagang Shipping Company Ltd v HNA Group Company Ltd [2020] UKSC 34 5 August Administrative law, Evidence, Civil Evidence Act 1995 It would permissible for a trial judge, in determining whether a bribe had been paid, to have regard to the possibility that a forced confession of bribery had been obtained by way of torture (and would therefore be inadmissible), even if actual torture had not been proved. [169]
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v Parry and others [2020] UKSC 35 19 August Tax Law, Inheritance Tax Act 1984 A transfer between pensions was not a 'transfer of value' for the purpose of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 as the motive for the transfer was not to confer a benefit on another. However, the failure by an individual to take up their rights to pension benefits was a 'transfer of value' which would be subject to Inheritance Tax. [170]
Peninsula Securities Ltd v Dunnes Stores (Bangor) Ltd [2020] UKSC 36 19 August Contract law, Restraint of trade, Property Law A restriction on a property owner from allowing further retail units from being built in a shopping center which would be in direct competition with an anchor tenant was a reasonable and proportionate restrictive covenant and therefore was enforceable by the anchor tenant. [171]
Unwired Planet International Ltd and another v Huawei Technologies (UK) Co Ltd and another , Huawei Technologies Co Ltd and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL , ZTE Corporation and another v Conversant Wireless Licensing SARL [2020] UKSC 37 26 August Intellectual property, Patent law, Jurisdiction The English courts have the jurisdiction to settle a global licence on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms in respect of a multinational standard essential patents portfolio. The grant of an injunction of against an infringing party that declines a FRAND licence is both appropriate and proportionate. [172]
Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi A.S. v OOO Insurance Company Chubb [2020] UKSC 38 9 October Insurance law, arbitration Where an arbitration agreement does not specify a governing law then the law of the underlying main contract will ordinarily govern the arbitration agreement. Where the main contract does not specify a governing law then it is for the courts to determine the law with which the arbitration agreement is most closely connected. [173]
R (on the application of Highbury Poultry Farm Produce Ltd) v Crown Prosecution Service [2020] UKSC 39 16 October 2020 Animal welfare, Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015 Offences incurred under the Welfare of Animals at the Time of Killing (England) Regulations 2015 are strict liability offences and as such there was no requirement to prove negligence by the business operating a slaughterhouse where a breach of the regulations had occurred. [174]
R (on the application of Z and another) v Hackney London Borough Council and another [2020] UKSC 40 16 October 2020 Equality, Equality Act 2010 The practices of a charity which provided social housing available primarily to the Orthodox Jewish community was proportionate to meet the needs or alleviate the disadvantages suffered by a particular group and therefore constituted permissible direct discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. The exemptions from the Act which allow charities to restrict the provision to benefits for the purpose of preventing or compensating for a disadvantage linked to the protected characteristic is not subject to a further test for proportionality. [175]
R (on the application of Pathan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 41 23 October 2020 Immigration Law The treatment by the Home Office of an individual who had applied for an extension of his skilled worker visa in good time and which had been refused on the basis that the Secretary of State had revoked the licence of his sponsoring employer without informing the individual, was unfair. [176]
Stoffel & Co v Grondona [2020] UKSC 42 30 October 2020 Illegality in English law, Professional Negligence Despite the illegality of her actions, a person who had engaged in mortgage fraud was not barred from bringing a claim for professional negligence against her solicitors for negligently failing to register the forms for the transfer of the property. [177]
Ecila Henderson v Dorset Healthcare University NHS Foundation Trust [2020] UKSC 43 30 October 2020 Mental health law, Medical Negligence, Illegality in English law A NHS Foundation Trust, which had accepted that it has been negligent in respect of the care of a person receiving care for paranoid schizophrenia, was not required to pay compensation to the individual where the individual subsequently incurred a loss as a result of committing a serious criminal act. [178]
Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd [2020] UKSC 44 6 November 2020 EU law, Res judicata The doctorine of Res judicata (preventing a party from re-litigating any claim) did not mean that decision of the General Court of the European Union was binding on domestic proceedings as not all rights of appeal had been exhausted. [179]
Alexander Devine Children's Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Ltd [2020] UKSC 45 6 November 2020 Property Law, Law of Property Act 1925 A developer who was seeking to develop land in breach of a restrictive covenant which prevented the development of land adjoining a children's cancer hospice could not rely on the covenant being "contrary to public interest" where it had already breached the covenant by its own actions. [180]
R (on the application of Maughan) v Her Majesty's Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire [2020] UKSC 46 13 November 2020 Standard of Proof, Coroners and Justice Act 2009 The standard of proof required in order to reach determinations of suicide and unlawful killing at inquests is the civil standard of proof (the balance of probabilities) rather than the criminal standard of proof (beyond reasonable doubt). [181]
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Others v Commissioners of Inland Revenue [2020] UKSC 47 20 November 2020 Tax Law, Advance corporation tax, Limitation Act 1980 The Limitation Act 1980 applies to claims for restitution of monies paid under a mistake of law. The six-year period allowed under the Limitation Act applies from the date on which the claimant has discovered the mistake (or could have reasonably discovered it) rather than the date on which the loss was made. When relying on another judgement to determine whether a claim is possible, the date on which a claimant could reasonable have discovered a loss may be earlier than the date of that other judgement if, using reasonable diligence, the claimant could have discovered that they had a worthwhile claim. [182]
Halliburton Company v Chubb Bermuda Insurance Ltd [2020] UKSC 48 [ permanent dead link ]27 November 2020 Insurance law, arbitration An arbitrator has a duty to make disclosures of matters that might reasonably be considered to give rise to doubts as to their impartiality in respect of a matter they are seeking to resolve. In the specific circumstances of the case in hand, the court found that there were not justifiable doubts as to the arbitrators impartiality. [183]
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs v London Clubs Management Ltd [2020] UKSC 49 27 November 2020 Tax Law, Gaming Duty Non-negotiable gaming chips and free bet vouchers issued by a casino as promotional tolls in order to encourage customers to gamble did not have any monetary value and therefore are not required to be taken into account in computing the profits of the casino for the purpose of calculating gaming duty. [184]
R (on the application of Gourlay) (AP) v Parole Board [2020] UKSC 50 4 December 2020 Parole Board for England and Wales A body which takes a decision in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity (in this case, the Parole Board), and then declines to defend it when it is challenged in court proceedings, will not ordinarily face an order for costs. [185]
Mastercard Incorporated and others v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE [2020] UKSC 51 11 December 2020 Competition Law The Competition Appeal Tribunal had erred in law in refusing to make a Collective Proceedings Order in collective proceedings brought by a representative of a group of consumers against companies in the Mastercard group[ citation needed ]
R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd [2020] UKSC 52 16 December 2020 Environmental Law,

Planning Act 2008

The Government had taken proper account of the UK's climate change commitments, including the Paris Agreement. Heathrow Airport may apply for planning permission for a third runway.[ citation needed ]
Robinson (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2020] UKSC 53 16 December 2020 European Union Law The phrase 'exceptional circumstances' does not import an additional hurdle before a Zambrano carer can be deported from the territory of the EU[ citation needed ]

2021 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd & others [2021] UKSC 1 15 January 2021 Insurance law Determining that commercial insurance for "business interruption" during the COVID-19 pandemic did respond to the lockdowns. [186]
R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2021] UKSC 2 5 February 2021 Criminal Law, Fraud On the scope of extraterritorial application of the Serious Fraud Office, the SFO does not have the power to compel a foreign company to produce documents held outside of the United Kingdom.[ citation needed ]
Okpabi and others v Royal Dutch Shell Plc and another [2021] UKSC 3 12 February 2021 Company law, Environmental Law English courts have jurisdiction over claims by victims of oil leaks from pipelines in the Niger Delta.[ citation needed ]
T W Logistics Ltd v Essex County Council & another [2021] UKSC 4 12 February 2021 Land Law Registration of land as a green does not criminalize pre-existing activities and local people have to exercise their rights over a town or village green in a fair and reasonable way.[ citation needed ]
Uber BV v Aslam [2021] UKSC 5 19 February 2021 Labour Law Drivers for Uber were "workers" within the definition in section 230(3)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, and were thus entitled to the minimum wage and holiday pay.[ citation needed ]
Evergreen Marine (UK) Limited v Nautical Challenge Ltd 2021 UKSC 6 19 February 2021 Mercantile Law For ship collision avoidance regulations, the crossing rules ought to be applied wherever possible and strictly enforced because they tend to secure safe navigation.[ citation needed ]
Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 7 26 February 2021 Nationality Law The Home Secretary appealed an earlier decision by the Court of Appeal in the case of Shamima Begum whose citizenship had been removed and who currently resides in a detainment camp in Syria.[ citation needed ]
Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake [2021] UKSC 8 19 March 2021 Labour law Care workers are not entitled to be paid the National Minimum wage for all the time that they were on a 'sleep-in' shift.[ citation needed ]
G (Appellant) v G (Respondent) [2021] UKSC 9 19 March 2021 Family Law,

Asylum Law

A return order in child abduction proceedings cannot be implemented until the appeal in any asylum claim made by the child or with the child as a dependant has been determined.[ citation needed ]
Asda Stores v Brierley and others [2021] UKSC 10 26 March 2021 Labour law,

Equal Pay Act 1970

Employees working in Asda's stores can use as comparators employees working in Asda's distribution centres for the purposes of an equal pay claim.[ citation needed ]
Balhousie Holdings Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs (Scotland) [2021] UKSC 11 31 March 2021 Value-Added Tax,

Tax Law

BCL did not dispose of its 'entire interest' in the care home, which meant HMRC was wrong to claw back the benefit of a zero-rating.[ citation needed ]
Burnett or Grant v International Insurance Company of Hanover Limited [2021] UKSC 12 23 April 2021 Insurance law Considered what is meant by 'deliberate acts' in an exclusion clause in a public liability insurance policy.[ citation needed ]
Rittson-Thomas and others v Oxfordshire County Council [2021] UKSC 13 23 April 2021 Land Law,

Schools Sites Act 1841

Land granted to a county council under the School Sites Act 1841 for use as a school did not cease to be used for that purpose, and therefore did not revert to the donor's estate, when the school moved to a new site and the land was sold with vacant possession, with the intention that the proceeds of sale would be used towards paying off the costs of acquiring the new site.[ citation needed ]
Zabolotnyi v The Mateszalka District Court, Hungary [2021] UKSC 14 30 April 2021 Extradition Law,

European Convention on Human Rights

There is no heightened test for the admissibility of evidence concerning alleged breaches of assurances given to a third state.[ citation needed ]
Her Majesty's Attorney General v Timothy Crosland [2021] UKSC 15 10 May 2021 Contempt of Court The lawyer committed criminal contempt of court by leaking a draft of the UKSC's judgment backing Heathrow Airport's expansion plans a day before the ruling was officially released.[ citation needed ]
Hurstwood Properties (A) Ltd and others v Rossendale Borough Council and another [2021] UKSC 16 14 May 2021 Local Government Finance Act 1988 Local authorities can sue two property developers over unpaid business rates.[ citation needed ]
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Tooth [2021] UKSC 17 14 May 2021 Tax Law There was no deliberate inaccuracy in Tooth's tax return.[ citation needed ]
R (on the application of Fylde Coast Farms Ltd (formerly Oyston Estates Ltd)) v Fylde Borough Council [2021] UKSC 18 14 May 2021 Town and Country Planning Act 1990 Oyston's legal challenge was made out of time.[ citation needed ]
Matthew v Sedman [2021] UKSC 19 21 May 2021 Limitation periods In a 'midnight deadline' case, the limitation period starts on the day rather than the following day and thus the appellant's claim was time barred.[ citation needed ]
Manchester Building Society v Grant Thornton UK LLP [2021] UKSC 20 18 June 2021 Negligence, scope of dutyThe Manchester Building Society could bring a claim for damages against Grant Thornton as a result of negligent accounting advice which ultimately resulted in MBS closing a number of hedges at a loss. [187]
Khan v Meadows [2021] UKSC 21 18 June 2021 Clinical negligence
General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v State of Libya [2021] UKSC 22 25 June 2021 State Immunity Act 1978
Director of Public Prosecutions v Ziegler [2021] UKSC 23 25 June 2021 Highways Act 1980
Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd [2021] UKSC 24 2 July 2021Causing loss by unlawful means
R (on the application of Haworth) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 25 2 July 2021
R (on the application of SC, CB and 8 children) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] UKSC 26 9 July 2021
A and B v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority [2021] UKSC 27 9 July 2021
R (on the application of AB) v Secretary of State for Justice [2021] UKSC 28 9 July 2021
Triple Point Technology, Inc v PTT Public Company Ltd [2021] UKSC 29 16 July 2021 Contract law
Sanambar v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 30 16 July 2021
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Others (Respondents) v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (Appellant) (1)
Test Claimants in the Franked Investment Income Group Litigation & Others (Respondents) v Commissioners of Inland Revenue (Appellant) (2)
[2021] UKSC 31 23 July 2021
Harcus Sinclair LLP v Your Lawyers Ltd [2021] UKSC 32 23 July 2021 Contract Law, Non-complete agreement, Restraint of trade A six-year non competition clause included in a commercial non-disclosure agreement between two law firms was not an unlawful restraint of trade and therefore was enforceable. [188] Solicitors' undertakings provided by limited liability partnerships do not fall within a court's inherent supervisory jurisdiction over solicitors and therefore are not summarily enforceable by the court. [189]
Royal Mail Group Ltd v Efobi [2021] UKSC 33 23 July 2021 Labour Law, Burden of Proof The burden of proof in discrimination claims lies with the claiment, in this case the employee, who must provide facts from which a tribunal could draw an inference of discrimination. [190]
X v Kuoni Travel Ltd [2021] UKSC 34 [lower-alpha 1] 30 July 2021 Contract Law, EU Law, Package Travel, Package Holidays and Package Tours Regulations 1992 The decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union determined that an employee of hotel which is booked through a package travel organiser is not himself a 'supplier of services' but that a travel organiser may still be liable for the acts of the employee if they constitute improper performance under the contract. Following this judgement the supreme court found that the deliberate acts of a hotel employee, in sexually assaulting a guest, constituted an improper performance of the tour operator's obligations and therefore the operator was liable for breach of contract. [191]
In the matter of T (A Child) [2021] UKSC 35 30 July 2021 Family Law, Liberty, Children Act 1989, Social Services and Well-Being (Wales) Act 2014 The High Court's inherent jurisdiction can be used to authorise the deprivation of liberty in order to keep a child safe from harm where no alternative route for safeguarding the child is available (in this case a lack of resource in the child care system). The court's may cut across relevant provisions of the Children Act 1989 when using their inherant jurisdiction in such cases and in doing so are not in breach of the European Convention on Human Rights. [192]
CPRE (Kent) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2021] UKSC 36 30 July 2021 Costs in English law, Civil Procedure Rules, Planning Law Where defendants and an interested party each incurred costs of preparing acknowledgments of service and summary grounds then there was no general rule in planning cases limiting the number of parties that can recover such costs. [193] [194]
R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 37 30 July 2021 Sexual offences in the United Kingdom;

Gillick competence

Test for a police force, when approached for information regarding a person about whom concerns are raised relating to their contact with children, is obliged in law to seek representations from the person before disclosing any information. [195]
R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 38 30 July 2021 Asylum law Review of Home Office's regime for determining the age of asylum seekers entering the United Kingdom. [196]
Tinkler v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 39 30 July 2021 Tax law Review when a taxpayer is prevented from challenging the validity of an enquiry into their tax return by HMRC where both parties have proceeded, for nearly a decade, on the mistaken assumption that the enquiry was validly initiated by a letter sent to the taxpayer. [197]
Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corp [2021] UKSC 40 18 August 2021 English contract law When a party can set aside a contract on the ground that it was entered into as a result of the other party threatening to do a lawful act. [198]
R (on the application of TN (Vietnam)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 41 22 September 2021 Fast Track Procedure 2005;

Asylum law

Determined effect of structural unfairness in the FTA 2005 on individual appeal determinations. [199]
Reference by the Attorney General and the Advocate General for Scotland—European Charter of Local Self-Government (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill[2021] UKSC 42 6 October 2021 Scotland Act 1998;

Devolution

The UNCRC Bill and ECLSG Bill passed by the Scottish Parliament were outside its legislative competence; the Bills are to return to the Scottish Parliament for further consideration. [200]
Ho v Adelekun [2021] UKSC 43 6 October 2021 Civil Procedure Rules Calculation of damages/pre-settlement costs. [201]
Anwar v The Advocate General [2021] UKSC 44 13 October 2021 Equality Act 2010; EU law The government did not breach its obligations under the relevant EU directives to provide effective interim protection for successful workplace discrimination and harassment claims. [202]
FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie (as Dependant and Executrix of Professor Sir Ian Brownlie CBE QC) [2021] UKSC 45 20 October 2021 English tort law;

Civil Procedure Rules

The appellant's claims did not satisfy the CPR requirements; its claims are also dependent on Egyptian law. [203]
R (on the application of Majera (formerly SM (Rwanda)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 46 20 October 2021 Immigration Act 1971 Appellant remains on bail in accordance with the original Bail Order. [204]
Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others [2021] UKSC 47 27 October 2021 Labour law Direct offers made to Unite member workers breached the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, s145B(2). [205]
Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) [2021] UKSC 48 27 October 2021 Arbitration agreements The arbitration agreement is governed by English law; there is no real prospect that the respondent was a party to the arbitrary agreement. [206]
Crown Prosecution Service v Aquila Advisory Ltd [2021] UKSC 49 3 November 2021 Corporate Crime, Directors' Duties Where the directors of a company had exploited their position and were in breach of their fiduciary duties to the company of which they were directors (in this case by making a secret profit of $4.55m) then another company to whom the proprietary rights were assigned could seek to recover the funds from the directors. As the directors had acted in breach of their fiduciary duties then the proceeds from their criminal acts were held on constructive trust for the company of which they were directors. [207]
Lloyd v Google LLC [2021] UKSC 50 10 November 2021Data privacy Data Protection Act 1998
Alize 1954 and another v Allianz Elementar Versicherungs AG and others [2021] UKSC 51 10 November 2021Duty of seaworthiness
A Local Authority v JB (by his Litigation Friend, the Official Solicitor) [2021] UKSC 52 24 November 2021 Mental Capacity Act 2005
Fratila v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2021] UKSC 53 1 December 2021 Universal credit, social security rights, EU law and Brexit
R (Association of Independent Meat Suppliers) v Food Standards Agency [2021] UKSC 54 8 December 2021 EU law, meat products, safety
McQuillan, McGuigan and McKenna, Re Application for Judicial Review [2021] UKSC 55 15 December 2021Human rights, and investigating deaths during the Troubles
R (Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56 15 December 2021Private life under ECHR art 8 and gender neutrality in passports
Maduro Board of the Central Bank of Venezuela v Guaido Board of the Central Bank of Venezuela [2021] UKSC 57 20 December 2021Foreign act of state doctrine
HM Attorney General v Crosland [2021] UKSC 58 20 December 2021Contempt of court

2022 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others [2022] UKSC 1 12 January 2022 Right to Manage, Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002,The definition of the premises over which the tenants of a self contained block of flats had the right to manage under the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 did not include shared estate facilities which were also used by other blocks of flats. The court determined that such an extension of the definition of premises would result in outcomes that were "absurd and unworkable" as, amongst other things, it would result in the tenants of the other flats having shared estate facilities provided by a right to manage company in which those other tenants did not have a legal relationship. [208] [209]
PWR v Director of Public Prosecutions , Akdogan and another v Director of Public Prosecutions [2022] UKSC 2 26 January 2022 Terrorism Act 2000, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights Two points were decided namely:
R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
[2022] UKSC 3 2 February 2022 Ultra Vires, British Nationality Act 1981, Immigration Act 2014 Parliament had authorised in primary legislation the imposition by subordinate legislation of a fee for the registration of a minor as a British Citizen. [212] [213]
Public Prosecutors Office of the Athens Court of Appeal v O'Connor [2022] UKSC 4 2 February 2022 Statutory Interpretation, Extradition Act 2003 Where a person's legal representative had stated orally in court that an appeal would be lodged against an extradition order this could not be attributed as an action of the person. As such the appeal to the previous judgement ordering the extradition was not valid as section 26(5) of the Extradition Act 2003 required that "the person did everything reasonably possible to ensure that the notice [of appeal] was given as soon as it could be given". [214] [215]
Bloomberg LP v ZXC [2022] UKSC 5 16 February 2022 Misuse of private information, Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights Two main issues were considered:
  • A person under criminal investigation has, prior to being charged, a reasonable expectation of privacy in respect of information relating to that investigation.
  • The confidentiality of a confidential law enforcement letter received by Bloomberg was a relevant important factor and rendered the information private and prevented Bloomberg from publishing on the basis of public interest. [216] [217]
Craig v Her Majesty's Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) [2022] UKSC 6 23 February 2022 United Kingdom constitutional law, Scotland Act 1998, European Convention on Human Rights The Lord Advocate (of Scotland) cannot order the extradition of a person if those acts would be incompatible with the persons rights under the European Convention on Human Rights. The failure by the Home Secretary to bring into force the forum bar provisions [lower-alpha 2] in Scotland (having been brought into force in England, Wales and Northern Ireland) was unlawful. Therefore the extradition procedure did not accord with the Crime and Courts Act 2013 and were incompatible with the individuals rights under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [218] [219]
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga [2022] UKSC 7 9 March 2022 English land law, Housing Act 1985 Two issued were decided
  • Where a fixed term secure tenancy had been granted by Croydon London Borough Council and the tenancy conditions had subsequently been breached (antisocial behaviour and rent arrears), the Council could not terminate the tenancy unless there was specific provision in the agreement for early termination and the Council had sought to rely on such provisions. (In the specific circumstances the Council's claim failed as they had not sought to rely on such provisions).
  • An agreement that provided the Council to seek an over for possession from the Court at any time if the tenant breached the terms of the agreement constituted a valid forfeiture clause. [220] [221]
Bott & Co Solicitors v Ryanair DAC [2022] UKSC 8 16 March 2022 Equitable Lien A firm of solicitors (Bott & Co) had an equitable lien over the compensation paid by Ryanair for passenger compensation claims for flight cancellations and delays where Ryanair were on notice that Bott & Co had been retained in resect of the claims. A change of policy by Ryanair from makings payments to Bott & Co (who previously then deducted their fee under the equitable lien) to making payments directly to the individuals and the fact that the claims were unlikely to be subject to litigation did not prevent Bott & Co from having an equitable lien (the consequence of which being that Bott & Co could pursue Ryanair for the fees due from the individuals). Decided by way of a 3-2 majority. [222] [223]
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v NCL Investments Ltd and another [2022] UKSC 9 23 March 2022 UK Corporation Tax, Corporation Tax Act 2009 Accounting debits arising under International Financial Reporting Standard 2 (IFRS 2) were a deductible expense for the purpose of UK corporation tax. The court confirmed that:
  • Such amounts were such that disregarding the debits would not be an adjustment required or authorised by law,
  • Such amounts should not be disallowed as an expense that was not incurred wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the rate,
  • Such amounts are not disallowed on the basis that they are capital in nature,
  • Such amounts were not "held... under and employee benefit scheme" and therefore could not be subject to the specific disallowances in respect of employee benefit contributions. [lower-alpha 3] [224] [225]
Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd [2022] UKSC 10 27 April 2022 EU Law, UK Tax Law,The application of a deemed withholding tax on manufactured overseas dividends [lower-alpha 4] on stock lending arrangements was not contrary to Article 63 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. As the counterparty borrowers to stock lending arrangements typically had sufficient withholding tax credits to fully offset on any deemed withholding tax on manufactured overseas dividends, the withholding tax could not be considered to discourage investment in foreign shares relative to UK shares by tax-exempt investors. [226] [227]
R (on the application of Coughlan) v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2022] UKSC 11 27 April 2022 Voter identification laws, Representation of the People Act 2000 Two main points were determined
Zipvit Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2022] UKSC 12 11 May 2022 UK Tax Law, Value Added Tax Judgment following a referral to the Court of Justice of the European Union [lower-alpha 5] (CJEU) in a previous supreme court case (see 2020 UKSC 15). The CJEU had confirmed that a trader could not recover VAT on supplies made to it where the original supplier and HMRC had mistakenly treated the original supplies as exempt from VAT as the VAT in question had not been 'due or paid'. The decision of the CJEU was affirmed by the supreme court by dismissing the taxpayers appeal. [230] [231]
R v Maughan [2022] UKSC 13 18 May 2022 Criminal Law Two matters in respect of sentencing policies were decided by the court:
  • The term 'proceedings' in Article 33 of the Criminal Justice (Northern Ireland) Order 1996, which provides that the court shall, in determining the appropriate sentence, take into account the 'stage in proceedings' at which a defendant indicates their intention to plead guilty, did not include the investigative process prior to a charge or issue of summons being made. However, this did not prevent the courts from adopting a sentencing policy which treats as relevant the failure to admit wrongdoing during interview and therefore made no error of law.
  • The purpose of discount for guilty pleads is to obtain the utilitarian benefits of saving time, cost, and providing reassurance for witnesses and victims. Where an offender is caught red handed they may have little choice other than to plead guilty and may not deserve the same level of discount as in other cases. [232] [233]
Competition and Markets Authority v Flynn Pharma Ltd
Competition and Markets Authority v Pfizer Inc
[2022] UKSC 14 25 May 2022 Costs in English law There is no generally applicable principle to provide that all public bodies should enjoy a protected costs position when they lose a case which they have brought or defended in the exercise of their public functions. A factor that should be considered in awarding costs in such circumstances is the risk that there will be a "chilling effect" on the conduct of the public body, and its ability to act in the public interest, where awards of costs are routinely made against it. This assessment is likely to be best made by the relevant court of tribunal in question, in this case the Competition Appeal Tribunal, who had acted reasonably in applying a "costs following the event" starting point. [234] [235]
Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC [2022] UKSC 15 15 June 2022 Immigration law, UK Borders Act 2007, Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights The court had to consider a number of matters in respect of an individual who had, together with his mother been granted indefinite leave to remain in the UK as a result of his mother having been persecuted by gang members in Jamaica but had subsequently committed criminal offences which would qualify the individual for deportation under the UK Borders Act 2007. Due to the threats against the individual and protections given by Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the individual could only be deported to Jamaica if the individual could reasonable be expected to stay in the rural areas of Jamaica ("internal relocation"). In considering deportation the court determined that:
  • The correct approach to whether internal relocation is possible requires a historical assessments of the individuals circumstances and should not include a value judgement of what is "due" to him as a criminal.
  • The First-tier Tribunal did not err in determining that the individual could not reasonably be expected to live in a rural area of Jamaica due to the medical requirements, family relationships and geographical relationships of the individual.
  • The First-tier Tribunal did not err in concluding that the individual was socially and culturally integrated in the UK as this is a fact sensitive judgement.
  • Where the public interest requested the deportation of a foreign criminal a full proportionality assessment was required to weigh any interference with their rights to family and private life under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [236] [237]
AIC Ltd v Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria [2022] UKSC 16 15 June 2022 Procedural law, Civil Procedure Rules The court considered the discretion of a court to reconsider a judgement and order after it has been given but before the formal order has been sealed by the court. In such circumstances a judge faced with an application to reconsider is required to consider such an application in line with the overriding principle to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost. However, significant weighting should be given to the finality principle, being that a judgement made is final, before a court should entertain reconsidering a judgement. [238] [239]
In the matter H-W (Children) [2022] UKSC 17 15 June 2022 Children Act 1989 A care order, in this case a care order made in relation to three children which approved care plans for removal of the children into separate long term foster placements, must be necessary to meet the needs of the children having regard to the advantages and disadvantages of all options. In considering the specific case, the court found that the process adopted by judge who originally made the care orders was flawed as it did not adequately assess the prospects of various other options. The case was therefore remitted to the lower courts of a rehearing. [240] [241]
Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Compton Beauchamp Estates Ltd
Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd v Ashloch Ltd and another
On Tower UK Ltd v AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd
[2022] UKSC 18 22 June 2022 Property Law, Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, Electronic Communications Code The court was required to determine who is the 'occupier of the land' in circumstances where a telecommunicators operator has been granted 'code rights [lower-alpha 6] ' which enabled them to install and operate network communications apparatus on land which is not owned by the telecommunications operator. The court found that the term must be given effect by reference to the intention of the Electronic Communications Code and therefore the occupier and operator at not one and the same and therefore an operator is not prevented from obtaining additional code rights in respect of the same land on which it already holds code rights. [242] [243]
Hastings v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd and another [2022] UKSC 19 29 June 2022 Consumer Protection Act 1987 A metal on metal prosthetic hip was found not to be defective in law. In considering whether the prosthetic hip was defective the court made the following key findings:
  • The nature of a product may be such that there can be no entitlement to an absolute guarantee of safety,
  • Generalised expressions of professional concern regarding a type of project (in this case metal on metal prosthesis) does not mean that a specific product is defective provided the product would not be worse when measured against existing equivalent products,
  • The removal of a product from the market for commercial reasons does not necessarily support that a product is defective,

[244] [245]

Basfar v Wong [2022] UKSC 20 6 July 2022 Employment law, human trafficking, modern slavery, diplomatic immunity, Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations A Saudi Arabian diplomat who alleged subjected a domestic staff member to conditions that would constitute modern slavery cannot rely on diplomatic immunity to prevent claims for compensation. In a majority opinion the court held that the exploitation of a domestic worker for the profit of a diplomat would constitute a 'commercial activity activity' and therefore would fall within once of the exemptions from immunity under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations. [246] [247]
Harpur Trust v Brazel [2022] UKSC 21 20 July 2022 Employment law, Working Time Directive 2003 Employees who only work for part of a given year (in this case a teacher who is only contracted to work during term time) are entitled to holiday pay on the same basis as employees who work all year. [248] [249]


2024 judgments

Case nameCitationDateLegal subjectSummary of decision
Paul & Anor v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust[2024] UKSC 1 11 January 2024 Tort law, Nervous shock A person cannot claim compensation for a recognised psychiatric illness caused by witnessing the death or injury of a close family member or other loved one due to medical negligence. Such an event is not discrete enough to qualify as a recognisable accident that incurs liability. [250]

See also

Notes

  1. The 2021 judgement in X v Kuoni Travel Ltd is a further judgement to the case heard in 2019 (X v Kuoni Travel Ltd (UKSC 34)) following a decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union
  2. The forum bar provisions are intended to prevent extradition from taking place where the offences could be fairly and effectively tried in the UK and where it is not in the interest of justice for the person to be extradited.
  3. Note: Subsequent to the periods subject to this case statutory legislation was introduced from March 2013 to disallow the deduction of accounting debits under IFRS 2 or equivalent accounting standards
  4. Manufactured overseas dividends are a concept under UK tax law in respect of returns made where a person (the lender) transfers the ownership of shares in a non-UK company to another person (the borrower) on terms such that the borrower repays the lending by way of the return of equivalent shares at the end of the lending person and the borrower receives a return that is economically equivalent to the dividends paid on the shares during the lending period.
  5. Judgement of the CJEU released on 13 January 2022 with case reference C-156/20
  6. Being rights covered by paragraph 9 of the Electronic Communications Code as set under the Communications Act 2003

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary Arden, Lady Arden of Heswall</span> British former Supreme Court judge

Mary Howarth Arden, Baroness Mance,, PC, known professionally as Lady Arden of Heswall, is a former Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. Before that, she was a judge of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andrew Burrows, Lord Burrows</span> British judge (born 1957)

Andrew Stephen Burrows, Lord Burrows, is a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. His academic work centres on private law. He is the main editor of the compendium English Private Law and the convenor of the advisory group that produced A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment as well as textbooks on English contract law. He was appointed to the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom on 2 June 2020. As Professor of the Law of England, University of Oxford and senior research fellow at All Souls College, Oxford at the time of his appointment, he was the first Supreme Court judge to be appointed directly from academia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stephen Sedley</span> British lawyer

Sir Stephen John Sedley is a British lawyer. He worked as a judge of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales from 1999 to 2011 and was a visiting professor at the University of Oxford from 2011 to 2015.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir</span> President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Robert John Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir, is a Scottish judge who has been President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom since January 2020. He was the principal judge in the Commercial Court in Scotland before being promoted to the Inner House of the Court of Session in 2008. He is an authority on human rights law in Scotland and elsewhere; he served as one of the UK's ad hoc judges at the European Court of Human Rights. He was also a Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong.

Shahram Taghavi is a barrister practising in the United Kingdom. He is a specialist in Judicial Review, Human Rights, Immigration and EU law. He was called to the England & Wales bar in 1994. He is a partner at Article 1, a law firm specialising in immigration, EU freedoms of movement and human rights law. He practised as an independent barrister at Doughty Street Chambers specialising in human rights, immigration and public law. He was joint head of the Human Rights and Public law departments and head of the Immigration department at Simons Muirhead & Burton solicitors. He was a Senior Barrister at Bates Wells & Braithwaite LLP as a member of their Public & Regulatory, Human Rights and Immigration departments, Deputy Head of Human Rights and Immigration at Lewis Silkin LLP, Head of Human Rights and Immigration at Charles Russell LLP and National Head of Immigration and Human Rights at Grant Thornton LLP.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pimlico Plumbers</span> British plumbing firm based in London

Pimlico Plumbers is a London-based plumbing firm established in 1979. With revenues of £20m as of 2015, it is London's largest independent plumbing company.

Oceanbulk Shipping & Trading SA v TMT Asia Ltd [2010] UKSC 44 is an English contract law case concerning the interpretation of contracts, raised on appeal from a Commercial Court hearing in 2009.

<i>Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth</i>

Lucasfilm Limited v Ainsworth[2011] UKSC 39 was a 2011 court ruling by the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The case concerned an intellectual property dispute over the production of Lucasfilm's Stormtrooper costumes by model maker Andrew Ainsworth. Mr Ainsworth argued that the helmets, which he continues to manufacture and sell, were functional props covered only by design right legislation, as opposed to Lucasfilm's assertion that they were sculptures or art which fall under copyright law. Design right protection is retained for 15 or 10 years, whereas copyright protection in this case would last 70 years after the death of the author.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">George Leggatt, Lord Leggatt</span> British judge (born 1957)

George Andrew Midsomer Leggatt, Lord Leggatt, is a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, the highest court of law in the United Kingdom.

<i>Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v Rahmatullah</i>

Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs v Yunus Rahmatullah [2012] UKSC 48 is a UK constitutional law case concerning the detention of Yunus Rahmatullah, a Pakistani citizen detained in Iraq, and later Afghanistan, who is alleged to have travelled to Iraq to fight for Al-Qaeda during the Second Iraq War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nicholas Underhill</span> Appeal Court judge in England and Wales

Sir Nicholas Edward Underhill, styled The Rt Hon. Lord Justice Underhill, is a British judge of the Court of Appeal of England and Wales.

<i>R (British Sky Broadcasting Ltd) v Comr of Police of the Metropolis</i>

R v Central Criminal Court[2014] UKSC 17 was a 2014 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. The court held that as inter partes proceedings created a lis between the parties, equal treatment meant that ex parte evidence in general could not be adduced.

<i>FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC</i> UK legal case

FHR European Ventures LLP v Cedar Capital Partners LLC[2014] UKSC 45 is a landmark decision of the United Kingdom Supreme Court which holds that a bribe or secret commission accepted by an agent is held on trust for his principal. In so ruling, the Court partially overruled Sinclair Investments (UK) Ltd v Versailles Trade Finance Ltd in favour of The Attorney General for Hong Kong v Reid (UKPC), a ruling from the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council on appeal from New Zealand.

<i>Re B</i> (A Child)

Re B (A Child) or In the matter of B (A child) [2016] UKSC 4 was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom concerning the habitual residence of a child under English law.

<i>R v Jogee</i> 2016 British landmark legal case on joint enterprise

R v Jogee[2016] UKSC 8 was a 2016 judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom that reversed previous case law on joint enterprise. The Supreme Court delivered its ruling jointly with the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, which was considering an appeal from Jamaica, Ruddock v The Queen [2016] UKPC 7.

In public law, abrogation is the proposing away of a right, power or value, by a public body in delegating power or failing to carry out a responsibility or duty. The abrogation of such a responsibility or duty, unless required by primary legislation would amount to an unconstitutional delegation of power to a foreign government or other sovereign power.

<i>Begum v Home Secretary</i> 2021 Supreme Court of the United Kingdom case

Begum v Home Secretary [2021] UKSC 7 is the short name of three closely connected proceedings considered together in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, R v Special Immigration Appeals Commission; R v Secretary of State for the Home Department; and Begum v Secretary of State for the Home Department, concerning Shamima Begum, a woman born in the United Kingdom who at the age of 15 travelled to Syria to join the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). Her intention to return to England in 2019 resulted in a public debate about the handling of returning jihadists.

<i>Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police</i> English tort law case

Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police[2018] UKSC 4 is a leading English tort law case on the test for finding a duty of care. An elderly woman was injured by two police officers attempting to arrest a suspect and she claimed that the police owed her a duty of care not to be put in danger. The UK Supreme Court found that the police did owe a duty of care in this case as there was no general rule that the police are not under any duty of care when performing their duties.

<i>R (Christie Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department</i> UK Supreme Court case

R v Secretary of State for the Home Department was a UK court case that ruled that the Home Office did not have an obligation to offer a third gender "X" option on passports.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michael Fordham (judge)</span> High Court judge

Sir Michael John Fordham,, styled The Hon. Mr Justice Fordham, is a judge of the High Court of England and Wales assigned to the King's Bench Division. He was appointed as a Justice of the High Court on 13 January 2020.

References

  1. Procedural issue before the main appeal reported at UKSC 15
  2. This issue was heard by a diminished panel of 3 judges
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 An augmented panel of 7 judges sat in this case
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 An augmented panel of 9 judges sat in this case
  5. This was an application made to the court to temporarily suspend the operation of an order made at [2010] UKSC 2
  6. The court was asked to extend the terms of an anonymity order made at [2010] UKSC 24
  7. The court made an order regarding the distribution of costs, main judgment at [2010] UKSC 14
  8. This judgment was simply a clarification of details of an order made in the previous judgement at [2010] UKSC 45
  9. The Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger also sat in on this case and gave a judgment that formed the unanimous majority.
  10. 1 2 Lord Rodger died before judgment was given in this case. He indicated that he would join the majority.
  11. 1 2 Judgment given outside of term time
  12. "Supreme Court issues landmark ruling on rehabilitation of extended sentence prisoners". Anderson Strathern. 2 November 2017.
  13. Ison, Kate (7 November 2017). "Supreme Court decision in Littlewoods: the conclusion to compound interest claims against HMRC?". Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP.
  14. Ohringer, Adam (1 November 2017). "Discrimination by qualification bodies: Michalak v General Medical Council [2017] UKSC 71". Cloisters. Archived from the original on 30 September 2022. Retrieved 25 October 2020.
  15. "Are Special Customer Records In Line With Human Rights Protections (R (On the Application of C) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions)". One Pump Court. 17 November 2017.
  16. Rutledge, Desmond (15 November 2017). "Zambrano carers: eligibility for welfare benefits and homelessness assistance". Garden Court Chambers.
  17. Williams, Heather; Avient, Michael. "De Silva decision on historic loss claims". Taxation.
  18. Sheppard, Ben (11 December 2017). "The Ticking Prescription Time Bomb - a harsh approach that offers certainty". Eversheds Sutherland.
  19. "Scotch Whisky v Lord Advocate: A Neat Solution or The Law on the Rocks?". Keep Calm Talk Law Ltd. 23 November 2018. Archived from the original on 28 October 2020. Retrieved 23 October 2020.
  20. Hall, James (15 January 2018). "Tiuta: lender claims in a bit of a mess". Hardwicke.
  21. "The beginning of time... O'Connor v Bar Standards Board". Weightmans. 12 December 2017.
  22. "Challenging a public body's decision for lack of any or adequate reasons". Allen & Overy. 18 December 2017.
  23. "Supreme Court takes expansive view of English court jurisdiction for tort claims". Allen & Overy. 31 January 2018.
  24. "Supreme Court holds Crown not bound by smoking ban provisions in Health Act 2006". Practical Law by Thomson Reuters. 20 December 2017.
  25. Khan, Asad (5 January 2018). "Case Comment: R (Hysaj & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 82, Part One". UKSC Blog.
  26. Khan, Asad (5 January 2018). "Case Comment: R (Hysaj & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC 82, Part Two". UKSC Blog.
  27. Lock, Daniella (2020). "A New Chapter in the Normalisation of Closed Material Procedures". The Modern Law Review. 83. Wiley Online Library: 202–216. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12484.
  28. Fisher, Richard (March 2018). "R (on the application of Gibson) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) [2018] UKSC 2". Doughty Street Chambers.
  29. Day, Paul (6 May 2018). "The Reverse Carltona: R (Bancoult) v Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary (No 3) [2018] UKSC 3". Administrative Law Matters.
  30. Carter, Matt (9 March 2018). "A closer look at Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police". The Student Lawyer.
  31. Richards, Jake (13 February 2018). "No power to grant immigration bail if no power to detain — Jake Richards". UK Human Rights Blog.
  32. Gonzalez, Ana (25 July 2019). ""Double descent" and British citizenship – for those born abroad with UK ancestry". Wilson Solicitors LLP. Archived from the original on 23 September 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  33. Traynor, Laurie. "Appeals against Prohibition Notices: HM Inspector of Health & Safety v Chevron North Sea Ltd [2018] UKSC7". Plexus Legal. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  34. Thomas, Ann; Ramos, Carolina. "In the matter of C (Children), [2018] UKSC 8". The International Family Law Group LLP.
  35. Yoshi, Yasmeen (20 March 2018). "Extended Family Members Case Study: SM (Algeria) v Entry Clearance Officer, UK Visa Section [2018] UKSC 9". Lexvisa.
  36. Elgar, Rachel (21 February 2018). "Barton v Wright Hassall LLP: Litigants in person – a not-so-special status". Walker Morris LLP.
  37. "The UK Supreme Court decision in Burnden Holdings (UK) Limited v Fielding: potential implications for directors in some corporate reorganisations". Lexology. 19 March 2018.
  38. Wibberley, James (23 April 2018). "Protecting solicitors when the client settles direct". Paragon Costs.
  39. Denholm, Aimee (2 May 2018). "New Judgment: R v McCool; R v Harkin [2018] UKSC 23". UK Supreme Court Blog.
  40. "QCR Summer 2018: Supreme Court clarifies that risk of smuggling is not a war risk and provides guidance on what would amount to maliciousness in the context of a war risks insurance policy". UK P&I Club.
  41. Wilson Stark, Shona (12 June 2018). "Shona Wilson Stark: In Re Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission's Application for Judicial Review [2018] UKSC 27: A Declaration in All but Name?". UK Constitutional Law Association.
  42. "Cartier International AG and others (Respondents) v British Telecommunications Plc and another (Appellants) [2018] UKSC 28". Stanford Law School. 13 June 2018.
  43. "Supreme Court restores avoidance finding in Project Blue SDLT case". Pinsent Masons. 14 June 2018.
  44. Cristofi, Constantine (23 August 2018). "J P Whitter - HMRC not obliged to consider impact of cancellation of Gross Payment Status on business". Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP.
  45. "Civil partnership law incompatible with European Convention on Human Rights, concludes Supreme Court". Hand Morgan & Owen. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
  46. Clapham, Nicholas (5 July 2018). "The Belhaj finale: Exclusion of closed material procedure means less scrutiny of DPP decisions". UK Human Rights Blog.
  47. Bridger, Olivia; Bennett, Alan (30 August 2018). "Goldman Sachs International v Novo Banco SA". Ashfords.
  48. "Repayment Claim (Taylor Clark Leisure)". Mazars. 20 July 2018. Archived from the original on 22 July 2020. Retrieved 21 July 2020.
  49. Bowcott, Owen (11 July 2018). "Supreme court rules against couple charged with funding terrorism". The Guardian .
  50. MacLynn, louise; Segal, Sharon; Magennis, Olivia (3 August 2018). "Williams v The London Borough of Hackney: Guidance for parents and local authorities on the use of s.20 Children Act 1989". Family Law Week. Archived from the original on 20 July 2020. Retrieved 20 July 2020.
  51. Donneky, Adrienne (2 August 2018). "Mills v Mills: The Supreme Court Judgment and its impact". Hugh James.
  52. "Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v HMRC – Supreme Court Decision". KPMG. 27 July 2018. Archived from the original on 16 July 2020. Retrieved 16 July 2020.
  53. "Police commissioner owed no duty of care to officers when conducting litigation". Burges Salmon. 2 August 2018.
  54. Bridger, Lucy (18 February 2019). "Analysis: Owens v Owens - the difficulty in divorce". Family Law by LexisNexis.
  55. "R v Mackinlay & Ors [2018] UKSC 42". Matrix Chambers. 25 July 2018.
  56. "Press Summary: R (on the application of Tag Eldin Ramadan Bashir and others) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2018] UKSC 45" (PDF). The Supreme Court. 30 July 2018.
  57. "Supreme Court Considers Legality of Enhanced Criminal Record Checks". Veale Wasbrough Vizards LLP. 10 August 2018.
  58. Cummins, Sarah. "Nottingham City Council v Parr: Supreme Court considers HMO suitability and students". Anthony Gold Solicitors.
  59. Pearce, Gemma (14 November 2018). "Warner v Scapa Flow Charters – The Athens Convention – "Suspension", "Postponement" and "Extension"". Global Insurance Law Connect Limited.
  60. Metzer, Jonathan (29 October 2018). "Supreme Court rules that parental misconduct irrelevant to whether child should leave UK — an extended look". UK Human Rights Blog.
  61. "Final means final, but maybe not always". Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland. 6 November 2018.
  62. "Pensions RPI / CPI: Supreme Court hands down its judgment in the Barnardo's case". Osborne Clarke. 7 November 2018.
  63. "UK SUPREME COURT CONFIRMS WARNER-LAMBERT PATENT CLAIMS INSUFFICIENT..." Gowling WLG. 21 November 2018.
  64. Klempa, Markus (27 November 2018). "Introducing a new species of easement: recreational rights". Stevens & Bolton.
  65. "The Definition of "Precarious" - Precarious No More? The Case of Rhuppiah v SSHD". Richmond Chambers LLP. 15 November 2018.
  66. "R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice". Blackstone Chambers. 30 November 2018.
  67. RK, Alex (28 November 2018). "Iron logic, coercion and odd outcomes: the Supreme Court decision in MM". Mental Capacity Law and Policy.
  68. "Volcafe Ltd and others -v- Compania Sub Americana De Vapores SA [2018] UKSC 61". Hill Dickinson. 31 January 2019.
  69. "Opposing a 1954 Act lease renewal on redevelopment grounds: a firm and settled intention". Simmons & Simmons. 21 December 2018.
  70. "Councils lose Supreme Court battle with TfL over vesting of highway". Local Government Lawyer. 5 December 2018.
  71. "Scottish and UK governments clash over Brexit court ruling". BBC News . 13 December 2018.
  72. Singh, Louise (30 January 2019). "Disability discrimination: what counts as 'unfavourable' treatment?". Weightmans.
  73. Weatherill, Gill; Kingston, Helen; Woods, Sarah; Nichols, Matthew (18 December 2018). "CTOs and Deprivation of Liberty - Supreme Court Decides". DAC Beachcroft.
  74. "Have you been served? An update on valid service of local authority completion notices for ratings liability (and beyond?)". Dentons. 8 January 2019.
  75. "Supreme Court Press Summary - R (on the application of Hallam) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) R (on the application of Nealon) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for Justice (Respondent) [2019] UKSC 2" (PDF). 30 January 2019.
  76. "Criminal disclosures: Supreme Court declares multiple conviction rule incompatible with Article 8 ECHR". Bird & Bird. January 2019.
  77. "Case Comment: Wells v Devani [2019] UKSC 4". UK Supreme Court Blog. 24 April 2019.
  78. "PRESS SUMMARY Perry (Respondent) v Raleys Solicitors (Appellant)" (PDF). UK Supreme Court. 13 February 2019.
  79. "Supreme Court guidance on loss of a chance claims - Perry v Raleys Solicitors". CMS Legal. 28 February 2019.
  80. Hayes, Saksie (21 May 2019). "Case Comment: Cameron v Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd [2019] UKSC 6". UK Supreme Court Blog.
  81. Molloy, Sean (6 March 2019). "A Note on: In the Matter of an Application by Geraldine Finucane for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)". UK Constitutional Law Association.
  82. "New Judgment: Konecny v District Court Czech Republic [2019] UKSC 8". UK Supreme Court Blog. 27 February 2019.
  83. Hamill, Rob. "In the matter of an application by Hugh Jordan for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2019]". Justice.org.[ permanent dead link ]
  84. Philps, Carherine. "KV (Sri Lanka) (Appellant) Secretary Of State For The Home Department (Respondent) [2019] UKSC 10". One Pump Court. Archived from the original on 29 September 2020. Retrieved 30 May 2020.
  85. Khan, Asad (18 April 2019). "Second Human Rights Claim Does Not Automatically Trigger Right Of Appeal Says Supreme Court". UK Supreme Court Blog.
  86. "HMRC v Joint Administrators of Lehman Brothers International". Tax Journal. 20 March 2019.
  87. Cross, Michael (20 March 2019). "Supreme Court allows 'reasonable diligence' appeal in fraud claim". The Law Society Gazette.
  88. "Outside education supplier can be a 'college' of a university". The Sunday Times. 4 April 2019.
  89. "Actavis Group PTC EHF v ICOS Corporation". Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases, Volume 136, Issue 4, April 2019, Pages 223–262. Oxford University Press. 16 December 2019.
  90. Baker, Andrew (28 March 2019). "R&S Pilling v UK Insurance Limited: Supreme Court Judgment". Horwich Farrelly. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  91. Woollcott, Emma (3 April 2019). "Stocker v Stocker: a victory for common sense". Mishcon de Reya. Archived from the original on 11 August 2020. Retrieved 31 May 2020.
  92. "New Judgment: R (Newby Foods Ltd) v Food Standards Agency [2019] UKSC 18". UK Supreme Court Blog. 3 April 2019.
  93. Wood, Andy (22 July 2019). "Supreme Court in Derry on share loss relief". Taxation .
  94. "Vedanta Resources Plc & Another v Lungowe & Others - Supreme Court Rules UK Correct Jurisdiction To Bring Claim Against Zambian Subsidiary". Gowling WLG. 17 April 2019.
  95. "HB Bulletin U2/2019: Supreme Court judgment: DA and Others and DS and Others". Department for Work and Pensions. 23 August 2019.
  96. Wright, Connor (31 May 2019). "R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and others [2019] UKSC 22". Justice.org. Retrieved 2 June 2020.
  97. Thornton, Arren (16 May 2019). "Lawbite: No place for the real world in this business rates negotiation". Eversheds Sutherland.
  98. "Redemption of QCBs crystallised gain rolled over from earlier conversion of non-QCBs (and other QCBs) (Supreme Court)". Practical Law Tax by Thomson Reuters. 24 May 2019.(subscription required)
  99. "How much comfort can local authorities take from the Supreme Court's decision in Poole Borough Council v GN [2019] UKSC 25?". Brodies. 12 July 2019.
  100. "Dennis Hutchings: Appeal against Diplock hearing dismissed". BBC News . 6 June 2019.
  101. Rogerson, John; Daley, Katherine (24 June 2019). "The meaning of "serious harm": the Supreme Court in Lachaux v Independent Print". White & Case.
  102. Lane, Andy; Lewin, Matt (13 June 2019). "What exactly did the Supreme Court say in Samuels v Birmingham?". Cornerstone Barristers.
  103. "Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening (The Swedish Club) v Connect Shipping Inc". National University of Singapore . Retrieved 5 June 2020.
  104. Sloane, Michelle (12 July 2019). "OWD – HMRC unable to permit temporary trading pending appeal". Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP.
  105. "Gubeladze v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions". Brick Court Chambers. 19 June 2019.
  106. Briant, Helen (4 July 2019). "Tillman v Egon Zehnder Ltd 2019 UKSC 32". Trowers & Hamlins.
  107. "London Borough of Lambeth v Secretary of State". CMS and Savills. 12 August 2019.
  108. "Government approach to disability benefit regulations rejected by Supreme Court: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM [2019] UKSC 34 (18 July 2019)". Garden Court North Chambers. 19 July 2019.
  109. "Judgement of Supreme Court in SSHD –v- Vomero". Luqmani Thompson & Partners. 24 July 2019. Retrieved 7 June 2020.
  110. "Supreme Court refers important food safety case to the Court of Justice of the European Union". Six Pump Court. 29 July 2019.
  111. Murray, Chris; Evans, Craig (6 August 2019). "Supreme Court: Questions referred to European Court of Justice on X v Kuoni". Clyde & Co.
  112. Whitaker, James; Wilson, Kate (31 July 2019). "UK Supreme Court rules on non-party access to documents used in litigation in England & Wales" (PDF). Mayer Brown.
  113. McGeachy, David. "VAT Update – August 2019". Saffery Champness.[ permanent dead link ]
  114. "Akcil & Ors v Koza Ltd & Anor [2019] UKSC 40". Hardwicke. 22 August 2019.
  115. "Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful, judges rule". BBC News . 24 September 2019.
  116. Harvey-Sullivan, Rose; Temple-Mabe, Kate (8 June 2020). "IN THE MATTER OF D (A CHILD) [2019] UKSC 42". 7BR.
  117. "Restriction of IHT exemption to UK charitable trusts violates free movement of capital (Supreme Court)". Practical Law by Thomson Reuters. 16 October 2019.(subscription required)
  118. Bowcott, Owen (16 October 2019). "UK judge granted whistleblower protection rights". The Guardian .
  119. Grant, Gregor; Jensen, William (24 October 2019). "Shanks v Unilever, Inventor of Diabetes Testing System Finally Rewarded for his "Outstanding" Contribution". Lexology.
  120. Hobbs, David (4 November 2019). "Forfeiture and licences – a ground breaking case". Bevan Brittan.
  121. "The Supreme Court has overturned the Court of Appeal's decision on Sequent Nominees Limited v Hautford Limited". Thomson Snell & Passmore . Retrieved 10 June 2020.
  122. Beresford, Neil; Wing, Mark (31 October 2019). "Product Liability - XYZ v Travelers Insurance Company Ltd (Supreme Court)". Clyde & Co.
  123. "New Judgment: In the matter of NY (A Child) [2019] UKSC 49". UK Supreme Court Blog. 30 October 2019.
  124. Allass, Kate; Mantell, Sally (13 November 2019). "Singularis v Daiwa: first Supreme Court case to uphold a claim for breach of the Quincecare duty of care". Farrer & Co.
  125. Casciani, Dominic (6 December 2019). "Torture charges against former Liberia leader's ex-wife dismissed". BBC News .
  126. "RR v Sec. of State for Work & Pensions & Ors (Interveners) [2019] UKSC 52". Field Court Chambers. 23 December 2019.
  127. "R (ON THE APPLICATION OF WRIGHT) V RESILIENT ENERGY SEVERNDALE LTD AND FOREST OF DEAN DISTRICT COUNCIL [2019] UKSC 53". Addleshaw Goddard. 22 November 2019.
  128. Aizlewood, Mark; De Cesare, Dean. "Supreme Court considers and fails to apply the benefit of hindsight" (PDF). Carter Perry Bailey.
  129. "Supreme Court decision in Royal Mail Group Ltd v Jhuti". Simmons & Simmons. 27 November 2019.
  130. Gilmartin, Charlotte (3 December 2019). "Supreme Court unanimously rules detention of asylum seekers pending removal was unlawful". UK Human Rights Blog.
  131. LLoyd, James (30 December 2019). "A Supreme change to alienation law? – James Lloyd". The Scotsman.
  132. "Town and village green law: Supreme Court decision on 'statutory incompatibility'". Burges Salmon. 17 February 2020.
  133. Shepard, Maria (February 2020). "Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah [2019] UKSC 59" (PDF). Justice.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 June 2020. Retrieved 13 June 2020.
  134. Cross, Michael (16 December 2019). "Part-time judges win Supreme Court action over pensions". The Law Society Gazette.
  135. Prytherch, Jack (January 2020). "UK Supreme Court rules that longer time limits for customs duty demands should apply in criminal context". Bird & Bird.
  136. Connolly, Róise (5 February 2020). "UK Supreme Court: NI Attorney General's application to refer 'devolution issue' refused". Irish Legal News.
  137. Leeson, Lucy (6 February 2020). "UK's highest court rules in favour of council following dispute with Samuel Smith Brewery over quarry extension". The Yorkshire Post.
  138. Hill, Stephanie (30 March 2020). "Supreme Court confirms Home Office falsely imprisoned people by imposing unlawful curfews". Leigh Day.
  139. "UK SUPREME COURT LIFTS STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF ICSID AWARD". Addleshaw Goddard. 10 March 2020.
  140. "Michael Stone: Supreme Court will not hear prisoner release case". BBC News . 19 February 2020.
  141. Wake, Peter (3 March 2020). "Detention and the law – another Supreme Court decision". Weightmans.
  142. Bowcott, Owen (11 March 2020). "Man's 'experiments' with explosives were lawful, court rules". The Guardian .
  143. "Supreme Court upholds protections for victims of human trafficking". Clan Child Law. April 2020. Retrieved 15 June 2020.
  144. Bowcott, Owen (25 March 2020). "UK cooperation with US over two alleged Isis killers ruled unlawful". The Guardian .
  145. "UK Supreme Court confirms bank named as loss payee under assignment of insurance policy not bound by exclusive English jurisdiction clause under the Brussels Regulation Recast 1215/2012". Herbert Smith Freehills. 2 June 2020.
  146. "Morrisons staff lose payout bid in Supreme Court data leak case". BBC News . 1 April 2020.
  147. Bruce, John; Williams, Hannah (7 April 2020). "Morrisons in the Supreme Court: data breach implications for D&Os". Kennedys Law. Archived from the original on 22 June 2020. Retrieved 20 June 2020.
  148. Fuller, Ceri; Wigan, Zoe; Larter, Hilary (6 April 2020). "Supreme Court holds that Barclays were not vicariously liable for acts of an independent contractor doctor". DAC Beachcroft.
  149. Bowcott, Owen (1 April 2020). "UK woman wins claim for NHS to pay US surrogacy costs". The Guardian .
  150. "Zipvit Ltd v HMRC referred to CJEU by UK Supreme Court". Mishcon de Reya. 1 April 2020.
  151. "Palestine Solidarity Campaign Case: government LGPS guidance unlawful". Burges Salmon. 4 June 2020.
  152. Casciani, Dominic (29 April 2020). "Deportation of man with HIV to Zimbabwe blocked by UK Supreme Court". BBC News .
  153. Reynolds, Rachael (21 May 2020). "Duval -v- 11-13 Randolph Crescent Ltd: Beware of Granting Consents in Residential Blocks". DAC Beachcroft.
  154. Ng, Kate (13 May 2020). "Gerry Adams wins Supreme Court appeal against convictions over prison break bids". The Independent .
  155. Phull, Karen (28 May 2020). "When is a vase not "a building"? The Supreme Court judgment in Dill". Farrer & Co.
  156. Croft, Jane; Eley, Jonathan (20 May 2020). "Supermarkets win Supreme Court ruling over cash machine taxes". Financial Times.
  157. Lawrence, Dominic (22 May 2020). "Deemed to fail: Fowler v HMRC". Charles Russell Speechlys.
  158. Cross, Michael (3 June 2020). "SC sends 'bullying' judge libel case back for retrial". The Law Society Gazette.
  159. Croft, Jane (17 June 2020). "Mastercard and Visa face billion-pound payouts after UK court ruling". Financial Times.
  160. Wright, Amber (22 June 2020). "Supreme Court: adjudication and insolvency". Shoosmiths.
  161. "Siblings not to be treated as "relevant persons": UKSC". Law Society of Scotland. 18 June 2020.
  162. McKee, Selina (25 June 2020). "Kymab wins Supreme Court case against Regeneron". PharmaTimes Media Limited.
  163. "Change of price apportionment calculation following revised HMRC guidance did not decrease consideration for VAT purposes (Supreme Court)". Practical Law Company. 25 June 2020.
  164. "No automatic right for a person with a property interest to make representations at first stage of confiscation process (Supreme Court)". Practical Law Company. 2 July 2020.
  165. Croft, Jane (1 July 2020). "UK Supreme Court accused of encouraging 'divorce tourism'". The Financial Times.
  166. "UK Supreme Court gives boost to creditors: bar on recovery of "reflective loss" relaxed in Sevilleja v Marex Financial Ltd". Dechert. 17 July 2020.
  167. "Paedophile Mark Sutherland loses human rights court challenge". BBC News . 15 July 2020.
  168. "Philanthropist Couple's Charity Battle Resolved in Landmark Case". New Law Journal. 30 July 2020.
  169. Pertoldi, Anna; McIntosh, Maura (17 August 2020). "Supreme Court clarifies proper approach to assessing weight of evidence where court finds serious possibility (but not probability) it was obtained by torture". Herbert Smith Freehills LLP.
  170. "Ill-health pension transfer not subject to IHT". Ross Martin. 27 August 2020.
  171. Elliott, Claire (27 August 2020). "Anchor tenants welcome clarification from the Supreme Court on whether restrictive covenants "restrain trade"". Carson McDowell.
  172. Tang, Sophia (22 September 2020). "Unwired Planet v Huawei [2020] UKSC 37: The UK Supreme Court Declared Competence to Determine Global FRAND Licensing Rate". ConflictOfLaws.Net.
  173. Goldsmith, Peter (Baron Goldsmith); Dymond, Tony; Taylor, Patrick; Rowe, Samantha (14 October 2020). "UK Supreme Court Sets Out Correct Approach to Determining Law Governing an Arbitration Agreement". Debevoise & Plimpton.
  174. "R (on the application of Highbury Poultry Farm Produce Ltd) (Appellant) v Crown Prosecution Service (Respondent) [2020] UKSC 39". The UK Centre for Animal Law. 18 October 2020. Archived from the original on 20 October 2020. Retrieved 19 October 2020.
  175. Piper, Anne-Marie; Poole, Joanna; de Lacey, Joseph (16 October 2020). "The Supreme Court's judgment in R v Hackney London Borough Council and Agudas Israel Housing Association". Farrer & Co.
  176. Yeo, Colin (23 October 2020). "Supreme Court finds treatment of skilled worker unfair". The Free Movement forum.
  177. Pertoldi, Anna; McIntosh, Maura (10 November 2020). "Supreme Court applies Patel v Mirza to reject illegality defence to solicitors' negligence claim where claimant had engaged in mortgage fraud". Herbert Smith Freehills.
  178. "Illegality Defence Upheld". New Law Journal. 3 November 2020.
  179. "Are Previous Findings Binding? - Supreme Court Provides Clarity on the Application of Res Judicata". Addleshaw Goddard. 11 November 2020.
  180. "Supreme Court Dismisses Developers' Appeal In Alexander Devine Children's Cancer Trust v Housing Solutions Limited". Irwin Mitchell LLP. 9 November 2020.
  181. "Dispute Resolution Blog". LexisNexis.
  182. "Supreme Court restricts limitation period for mistake of law claims". Simmons & Simmons. 4 December 2020.
  183. "From Deepwater to clear water? Has the Supreme Court clarified when an arbitrator is apparently biased?". Stewarts Law LLP. 27 November 2020.
  184. "Free betting vouchers and gaming chips issued by casinos not liable to gaming duty". The Times . 8 December 2020.
  185. "Judicial review: Costs of application". The Law Society Gazette. 21 December 2020.
  186. "Insurers must pay small firms for Covid lockdown losses". BBC News. 15 January 2021.
  187. Slingo, Jemma (18 June 2021). "Supreme Court clarifies duty test in Grant Thornton ruling". The Law Society Gazette.
  188. Fisher, David; Dasgupta, Pooja (6 September 2021). "Takeaways on the enforceability of non-compete clauses from UK top court ruling". Lexology.
  189. Slingo, Jemma (23 July 2021). "Supreme Court warns of LLP lacuna in VW claim decision". The Law Society Gazette.
  190. Broadbent, Jo; Martin, Stefan (28 July 2021). "As you were – UK Supreme Court confirms no change to discrimination burden of proof". JD Supra, LLC.
  191. Prager, Sarah (30 July 2021). "Case Update: The Supreme Court Judgment in X v Kuoni Travel [2021] UKSC 34". 1 Chancery Lane.
  192. "T(A child) [2021] UKSC 35". Family Law Week. Archived from the original on 11 October 2021. Retrieved 11 October 2021.
  193. Leithead, Howard (1 September 2021). "Supreme Court provides costs guidance for planning statutory reviews that also affects judicial review cases (CPRE Kent v SSCLG)". No5 Barristers Chambers.
  194. Chapman, Adam; Tyler, Michael (5 August 2021). "Case Note – costs of interested parties in judicial review proceedings: CPRE Kent v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government UK/SC 2019/0174".
  195. "New Judgment: R (on the application of A) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 37". UKSCBlog. 30 July 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  196. "New Judgment: R (on the application of BF (Eritrea)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 38". UKSCBlog. 30 July 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  197. "New Judgment: Tinkler v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs [2021] UKSC 39". UKSCBlog. 30 July 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  198. "New Judgment: Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 40". UKSCBlog. 18 August 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  199. "New Judgment: R (on the application of TN (Vietnam)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another [2021] UKSC 41". UKSCBlog. 22 September 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  200. "New Judgment: Reference by the Attorney General and the Advocate General for Scotland – United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill; Reference by the Attorney General and the Advocate General for Scotland – European Charter of Local Self-Government (Incorporation) (Scotland) Bill [2021] UKSC 42". UKSCBlog. 6 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  201. "New Judgment: Ho v Adelekun [2021] UKSC 43". UKSCBlog. 6 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  202. "New Judgment: Anwar v The Advocate General for Scotland (representing the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy) (Scotland) [2021] UKSC 44". UKSCBlog. 13 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  203. "New Judgment: FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC (Appellant) v Brownlie (Respondent) [2021] UKSC 45". UKSCBlog. 20 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  204. "New Judgment: R (on the application of Majera (formerly SM (Rwanda)) (AP) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 46". UKSCBlog. 20 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  205. "New Judgment: Kostal UK Ltd v Dunkley and others [2021] UKSC 47". UKSCBlog. 27 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  206. "New Judgment: Kabab-Ji SAL (Lebanon) v Kout Food Group (Kuwait) [2021] UKSC 48". UKSCBlog. 27 October 2021. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
  207. "Illegality of directors not attributed to company in confiscation proceedings (Supreme Court)". Practical Law by Thomson Reuters. 4 November 2021.
  208. "Press Summary: FirstPort Property Services Ltd (Appellant) v Settlers Court RTM Company and others (Respondents) [2022] UKSC 1". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 12 January 2022.
  209. "Right to Manage: FirstPort Property Services Ltd v Settlers Court RTM Company and others". www.clarkewillmott.com. Clarke Willmott. 4 May 2022.
  210. "Press Summary: Pwr (Appellant) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) Akdogan and another (Appellants) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 2 On appeal from: [2020] EWHC 798 (Admin)". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 26 January 2022.
  211. March, Samuel (3 February 2022). "Supreme Court dismisses protestors' appeal over PKK flag conviction". ukhumanrightsblog.com. UK Human Rights Blog (1 Crown Office Row barristers' chambers).
  212. "Press Summary: R (on the application of O (a minor, by her litigation friend AO)) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) R (on the application of The Project for the Registration of Children as British Citizens) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 3 On appeal from: [2021] EWCA Civ 193". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 2 February 2022.
  213. "Supreme Court rules £1,012 Home Office fee for a child to be registered as a British citizen is lawful". www.ein.org.uk. Electronic Immigration Network. 2 February 2022.
  214. "Press Summary: Public Prosecutors Office of the Athens Court of Appeal (Appellant) v O'Connor (Respondent) (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 4 On appeal from: [2017] NIQB 77". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 2 February 2022.
  215. Anosike, Eniyoma (16 May 2022). "Public Prosecutors Office of the Athens Court of Appeal (Appellant) v Connor (AP) (Respondent) (Northern Ireland)". thestudentlawyer.com. The Student Lawyer.
  216. "Press Summary: Bloomberg LP (Appellant) v ZXC (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 5 On appeal from [2020] EWCA 611". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 16 February 2022.
  217. Waterson, Jim (16 February 2022). "Bloomberg loses landmark UK supreme court case on privacy". The Guardian.
  218. "Press Summary: Craig (Appellant) v Her Majesty's Advocate (for the Government of the United States of America) and another (Respondents) (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 6 On appeal from: [2020] HCJAC 22". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 23 February 2022.
  219. Cowan, David (23 February 2022). "Supreme Court halts James Craig's US fraud case extradition". BBC News.
  220. "Press Summary: Croydon London Borough Council (Appellant) v Kalonga (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 7 On appeal from: [2021] EWCA Civ 77 (Admin)". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 9 March 2022.
  221. Heatley, Sarah (13 April 2022). "The impact of Croydon LBC v Kalonga on fixed-termed tenancies". www.propertyweek.com. Property Week.
  222. "Press Summary: Bott & Co Solicitors Ltd (Appellant) v Ryanair DAC (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 8 On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 143)". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 9 March 2022.
  223. Moseley, Lucy; Williamson, Annabel (20 April 2022). "What does the recent Bott v Ryanair Supreme Court judgment mean for claims management companies handling Regulation 261 compensation claims?". www.shlegal.com. Stephenson Harwood.
  224. "Press Summary: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v NCL Investments Ltd and another (Respondents) [2022] UKSC 9 On appeal from: [2020] EWCA Civ 663". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 23 March 2022.
  225. Robson, Jamie (22 July 2022). "Supreme Court's NCL Investments decision highlights complications of UK tax base". mnetax.com. MNE Tax.
  226. "Press Summary: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Appellant) v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 10 On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 1610". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 27 April 2022.
  227. "Supreme Court judgment in HMRC v Coal Staff Superannuation Scheme Trustees Ltd". home.kpmg/uk/en/home.html. KPMG. 3 May 2022.
  228. "Press Summary: R (on the application of Coughlan) (Appellant) v Minister for the Cabinet Office (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 11 On appeal from: [2020] EWCA Civ 723". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 27 April 2022.
  229. "Supreme Court rejects appeal over introduction of voter ID pilot schemes in May 2019 local government elections". www.localgovernmentlawyer.co.uk. Local Government Lawyer. 27 April 2022.
  230. "Press Summary: Zipvit Ltd (Appellant) v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) (No 2) [2022] UKSC 12 On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 1515 723". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 11 May 2022.
  231. "Zipvit v HMRC". www.taxjournal.com. Tax Journal. 17 May 2022.
  232. "Press Summary: R v Maughan (Appellant) (Northern Ireland) [2022] UKSC 13 On appeal from: [2019] NICA 66". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 11 May 2022.
  233. Tahir, Hassan (14 September 2022). "R v Maughan (Northern Ireland)". www.thestudentlawyer.com. The Student Lawyer.
  234. "Press Summary: Competition and Markets Authority (Respondent) v Flynn Pharma Ltd and another (Appellants) Competition and Markets Authority (Respondent) v Pfizer Inc and another (Appellants) [2022] UKSC 14 On appeal from: [2020] EWCA Civ 617". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 25 May 2022.
  235. Clark, Michael (27 May 2022). "Important Supreme Court judgment regarding costs awards against public bodies/regulators". www.clydeco.com. Clyde & Co LLP.
  236. "Press Summary: SC (Jamaica) (Appellant) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 15 On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Civ 2112". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 15 June 2022.
  237. Ali Khan, Asad (24 July 2022). "Supreme Court allows Jamaican criminal's appeal". United Kingdom Immigration Law Blog.
  238. "Press Summary: AIC Ltd (Respondent) v Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (Appellant) [2022] UKSC 16 On appeal from: [2020] EWCA 1585". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 15 June 2022.
  239. Brown, Matthew (3 August 2022). "British Virgin Islands: AIC Ltd v Federal Airports Authority Of Nigeria [2022] UKSC 16: Reconsidering An Order Before It Is Sealed". www.mondaw.com. Totola: Mondaq.
  240. "Press Summary: In the matter of H-W (Children) In the matter of H-W (Children) (No 2) [2022] UKSC 17 On appeal from: [2021] EWCA Civ 1451". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 15 June 2022. UKOpenGovernmentLicence.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under an Open Government Licence v3.0. © Crown copyright.
  241. Cross, Emma (16 June 2022). "Supreme Court – Re H-W (Children): Proportionality of Care Orders". www.magdalenchambers.co.uk. Magdalen Chambers.
  242. "Press Summary: Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd (Appellant) v Compton Beauchamp Estates Ltd (Respondent) Cornerstone Telecommunications Infrastructure Ltd (Appellant) v Ashloch Ltd and AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd (Respondents) On Tower UK Ltd (formerly known as Arqiva Services Ltd) (Appellant) v AP Wireless II (UK) Ltd (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 18 On appeals from: [2019] EWCA Civ 1755; [2021] EWCA Civ 90 and [2020] UKUT 0195 (Lands Chamber)". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 22 June 2022.
  243. "UK Supreme Court widens Electronic Communications Code rights for operators". Osborne Clarke. 29 July 2022.
  244. "Press Summary: Hastings (Appellant) v Finsbury Orthopaedics Ltd and another (Respondents) (Scotland) [2022] UKSC 19 On appeal from: [2021] CSIH 6". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 29 June 2022.
  245. Leadley, John; Corby, Kate; Redmond, Joanne; Gest, Lauren (8 July 2022). "UK Supreme Court rules no entitlement for consumers to an "absolute level of safety" in product liability case". Global Compliance News.
  246. "Basfar (Respondent) v Wong (Appellant) [2022] UKSC 20 On appeal from: UKEAT/223/19/BA". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 6 July 2022.
  247. Siddique, Haroon; Wintour, Patrick (6 July 2022). "Diplomats who exploit domestic staff cannot rely on immunity, says UK supreme court". The Guardian .
  248. "Press Summary: Harpur Trust (Appellant) v Brazel (Respondent) [2022] UKSC 21 On appeal from: [2019] EWCA Civ 1402". www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 20 July 2022.
  249. "Harpur Trust vs Brazel Holiday Pay: What is the impact of the Supreme Court's judgment in the Harpur Trust v Brazel case?". PwC.
  250. "Press Summary: Paul and another (Appellants) v Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust (Respondent); Polmear and another (Appellants) v Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust (Respondent); Purchase (Appellant) v Ahmed (Respondent) [2024] UKSC 1 On appeal from: [2022] EWCA Civ 12" (PDF). www.supremecourt.uk (The Supreme Court). The Supreme Court. 29 May 2024.

UKOpenGovernmentLicence.svg  This article incorporates text published under the British Open Government Licence : https://www.supremecourt.uk