Medical Hypotheses

Last updated

Founding and editorship

Medical Hypotheses was founded in 1975 by physiologist David Horrobin, who was the editor-in-chief of the journal until his death in 2003 as well as the head of the Schizophrenia Association in Britain. [8] Horrobin was a controversial figure, a scientist and entrepreneur best known for his promotion of evening primrose oil as a treatment for diseases, leading the British Medical Journal (BMJ) to predict that he "may prove to be the greatest snake oil salesman of his age." [3] [9] Horrobin wrote in his inaugural editorial for Medical Hypotheses: "The history of science has repeatedly shown that when hypotheses are proposed it is impossible to predict which will turn out to be revolutionary and which ridiculous. The only safe approach is to let all see the light and to let all be discussed, experimented upon, vindicated or destroyed. I hope the journal will provide a new battlefield open to all on which ideas can be tested and put through the fire." [10] In its first edition, Medical Hypotheses published articles from its editorial review board member, virologist Frank Macfarlane Burnet, in vitro fertilization pioneer Ian Johnston, Gerald Kolodny of Beth Israel Medical Center, and Tom Tenforde, later chief scientist of the United States Department of Energy. [10]

After Horrobin's death, Bruce G. Charlton, a professor of evolutionary psychology at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne and theoretical medicine at the University of Buckingham, became the editor, [11] making publication decisions with the informal assistance of an advisory board. Horrobin had described Charlton as "the only person I really trust to take it over and run it in an open-minded fashion". [12] Notable members of the advisory board included behavioral neurologist António Damásio, cognitive neuroscientist Vilayanur S. Ramachandran, surgical pioneer Roy Calne, psychiatrist David Healy, philosopher David Pearce, and the Nobel laureate Arvid Carlsson. [13] Mehar Manku became the editor of Medical Hypotheses after Charlton was fired in 2010. [14]

Medical Hypotheses was initially published by Eden Press. Elsevier has been its publisher since 2002.

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed in the Science Citation Index, Index Medicus, BIOSIS Previews, Chemical Abstracts, Elsevier BIOBASE/Current Awareness in Biological Sciences, Current Contents/Clinical Medicine, Current Contents/Life Sciences, and EMBASE/Excerpta Medica. [15] It was delisted from PubMed and Medline in January 2022. [16]

Research

The most widely cited article [17] from Medical Hypotheses was published in 1991 by Ronald S. Smith in which he proposed the macrophage theory of depression as an alternative to the monoamine theory of depression. [18] [19] [20] Other famous articles featured in the journal include the proposal from Jarl Flensmark of Malmö, Sweden, that schizophrenia may be caused by wearing heeled shoes, [21] and an article from Svetlana Komarova of McGill University positing that facial hair may play a role in preventing the development of cancer. [22]

In what psychiatrist and The Guardian columnist Ben Goldacre called an "almost surreally crass paper", two Medical Hypotheses authors posited "mongoloid" as an accurate term for people with Down syndrome because those with Down syndrome share characteristics with people of Asian origin, including a reported interest in crafts, sitting with crossed legs and eating foods containing monosodium glutamate (MSG). [23] Correspondence items have presented masturbation as a treatment for nasal congestion. [24] [25] Science reported that a 2009 paper by Georg Steinhauser on navel lint "became an instant classic". [3] [26]

In 2007, journalist Roger Dobson published a book in which he collected and described 100 Medical Hypotheses articles called Death Can Be Cured. [27] [28]

Peer review debate

Horrobin began the journal in response to what he viewed as the limitations of peer review. [3] He wrote, "The primary criteria for acceptance are very different from the usual journals. In essence what I look for are answers to two questions only: Is there some biological plausibility to what the author is saying? Is the paper readable? We are NOT looking at whether or not the paper is true but merely at whether it is interesting." [12] According to physiologist John Stein, Horrobin believed from his days as an undergraduate that peer review encourages adherence to currently accepted ideas at the expense of innovation. [29] Also neuroscientist Vilayanur Ramachandran, who is on the journal's editorial review board, told Science : "There are ideas that may seem implausible but which are very important if true. This is the only place you can get them published." [3]

At October 2012, an international campaign involving 198 scientists published a critical article defending Bruce Charlton and the idea of editorial review. [30]

AIDS denialism papers and fallout

In 2009, the journal's publisher, Elsevier, withdrew two articles written by AIDS denialists that had been accepted for publication. One of the withdrawn articles, written by Peter Duesberg and David Rasnick, claimed that there is "yet no proof that HIV causes AIDS" and was not responsible for deaths in South Africa that another paper had attributed to it and misrepresented the results of medical research on antiretroviral drugs. [23] [31] This paper had originally been submitted to the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes (JAIDS), but it was rejected after peer review. One of the editors of JAIDS later cited problems with the paper, alleging that it had contained cherry-picking and other dishonest claims. [32] The publisher stated that the articles "could potentially be damaging to global public health. Concern has also been expressed that the article contains potentially libelous material. Given these important signals of concern, we judge it correct to investigate the circumstances in which this article came to be published online." [31]

The withdrawal followed a campaign by scientists who criticised the articles' factual accuracy and the process behind their acceptance. [23] [33] A group of 20 HIV scientists and advocates contacted the National Library of Medicine to request that the journal be removed from the MEDLINE database alleging that the journal lacked scientific rigor and had become a "tool for the legitimization of at least one pseudoscientific movement: AIDS denialism." [5] Economist Nicoli Nattrass wrote in an article in AIDS and Behavior that "Medical Hypotheses has long been a source of concern in the scientific community because the articles are not peer-reviewed," and that the National Library of Medicine had been requested to review the journal "for de-selection from PubMed on the grounds that it was not peer-reviewed and had a disturbing track record of publishing pseudo-science." [4] Nattrass later wrote that as a result of the controversy, Science reported that Elsevier had asked that the journal's editor either raise the standards of review or resign. [34] A review panel convened by Elsevier recommended that Medical Hypotheses adopt some form of peer review to avoid publication of "baseless, speculative, non-testable and potentially harmful ideas". Editor Bruce Charlton said that peer review went against the journal's 30-year history and is not supported by either him or the journal's editorial board. [35] Elsevier reportedly told Charlton that his position would not be renewed at the end of the year, and Charlton said he would not resign. [11] On 11 May 2010 Bruce Charlton announced on his blog that he "was sacked" by Elsevier. [36] [ self-published source? ]

Of the journal's 19 editorial board members, 13 wrote to Elsevier in protest over the decision to change the journal's editorial policies. [3] The group of scientists wrote that not having peer review "is an integral part of our identity, indeed our very raison d'être," and they would resign their positions if it was instituted. [3] One of the members, David Healy of the University of Cardiff School of Medicine, said that the review board members' letter was "a defense of Bruce, not of the Duesberg paper." [3] In contrast, board member António Damásio said that the paper should not have been published on the journal's website. [3]

In June 2010, Elsevier announced the appointment of Mehar Manku as the new editor, and stated that "submitted manuscripts will be reviewed by the Editor and external reviewers to ensure their scientific merit. All reviewers will be fully aware of the Aims and Scope of the journal and will be judging the premise, originality and plausibility of the hypotheses submitted." [37] Manku was previously the Editor of Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids , another journal founded by Horrobin. [38]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Duesberg</span> German-American molecular biologist (born 1936)

Peter H. Duesberg is a German-American molecular biologist and a professor of molecular and cell biology at the University of California, Berkeley. He is known for his early research into the genetic aspects of cancer. He is a proponent of AIDS denialism, the claim that HIV does not cause AIDS.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">HIV/AIDS denialism</span> False belief that HIV does not cause AIDS

HIV/AIDS denialism is the belief, despite conclusive evidence to the contrary, that the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) does not cause acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Some of its proponents reject the existence of HIV, while others accept that HIV exists but argue that it is a harmless passenger virus and not the cause of AIDS. Insofar as they acknowledge AIDS as a real disease, they attribute it to some combination of sexual behavior, recreational drugs, malnutrition, poor sanitation, haemophilia, or the effects of the medications used to treat HIV infection (antiretrovirals).

<i>The Lancet</i> Peer-reviewed general medical journal

The Lancet is a weekly peer-reviewed general medical journal and one of the oldest of its kind. It is also one of the world's highest-impact academic journals. It was founded in England in 1823.

<i>JAMA</i> Peer-reviewed medical journal published by the American Medical Association

JAMA (The Journal of the American Medical Association) is a peer-reviewed medical journal published 48 times a year by the American Medical Association. It publishes original research, reviews, and editorials covering all aspects of biomedicine. The journal was established in 1883 with Nathan Smith Davis as the founding editor. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo of the University of California San Francisco became the journal editor-in-chief on July 1, 2022, succeeding Howard Bauchner of Boston University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Luc Montagnier</span> French virologist and Nobel laureate (1932–2022)

Luc Montagnier was a French virologist and joint recipient, with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi and Harald zur Hausen, of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). He worked as a researcher at the Pasteur Institute in Paris and as a full-time professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China.

Science by press conference or science by press release is the practice by which scientists put an unusual focus on publicizing results of research in the news media via press conferences or press releases. The term is usually used disparagingly, to suggest that the seekers of publicity are promoting claims of questionable scientific merit, using the media for attention as they are unlikely to win the approval of the scientific community.

David Frederick Horrobin was a British-Canadian entrepreneur, medical researcher, author and editor. He is best known as the founder of the biotechnology company Scotia Holdings and as a promoter of evening primrose oil as a medical treatment, Horrobin was founder and editor of the journals Medical Hypotheses and Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids, the latter journal co-founded with his then graduate student Morris Karmazyn.

The Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine is a peer-reviewed medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the Royal Society of Medicine with full editorial independence. Its continuous publication history dates back to 1809. Since July 2005 the editor-in-chief is Kamran Abbasi, who succeeded Robin Fox who was editor for almost 10 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pride Chigwedere</span> Zimbabwean physician-scientist

Pride Chigwedere, a Zimbabwean national, is a Harvard trained physician-scientist working in global health. He is most notable for leading a team of Harvard researchers who demonstrated that South African President Thabo Mbeki's AIDS policies led to more than 300 000 deaths. While South Africa's policies were condemned by many, Chigwedere's contribution was in developing and applying methods to quantify the impact of the policies thus demonstrating the calamitous consequences of AIDS denialism. Generalized, he developed an approach for evaluating public health practice and highlighted the need to develop a framework for accountability in public health. Drawing from the analogy with medicine, he has proposed the concept of public health malpractice to capture negligence that causes harm as a useful first step towards accountability in public health. A response to Chigwedere's work by AIDS denialists led by Peter Duesberg was initially published by the non-peer-reviewed journal Medical Hypotheses followed by a retraction because of poor quality of data, undeclared conflicts of interest, and potential effects on global health.

<i>Inventing the AIDS Virus</i> 1996 book by Peter Duesberg

Inventing the AIDS Virus is a 1996 book by molecular biologist Peter Duesberg, in which the author argues that HIV does not cause AIDS. Duesberg contends that HIV is a harmless passenger virus and that AIDS is caused by unrelated factors such as drug abuse, antiretroviral medication, chronic malnutrition, poor sanitation, and hemophilia. The unambiguous scientific consensus is that HIV causes AIDS and that Duesberg's claims are incorrect. Duesberg received a negative response from the scientific community for supporting AIDS denialism, misrepresenting and ignoring the scientific evidence that HIV causes AIDS, and for relying upon poor logic and manipulation. The book was also the subject of an authorship dispute with one of his graduate students.

Scholarly peer review or academic peer review is the process of having a draft version of a researcher's methods and findings reviewed by experts in the same field. Peer review is widely used for helping the academic publisher decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected for official publication in an academic journal, a monograph or in the proceedings of an academic conference. If the identities of authors are not revealed to each other, the procedure is called dual-anonymous peer review.

Bruce Graham Charlton is a retired British medical doctor who was visiting professor of Theoretical Medicine at the University of Buckingham. Until April 2019, he was Reader in Evolutionary Psychiatry at Newcastle University. Charlton was editor of the controversial and not-conventionally-peer reviewed journal Medical Hypotheses from 2003 to 2010.

In South Africa, HIV/AIDS denialism had a significant impact on public health policy from 1999 to 2008, during the presidency of Thabo Mbeki. Mbeki criticized the scientific consensus that HIV is the cause of AIDS beginning shortly after his election to the presidency. In 2000, he organized a Presidential Advisory Panel regarding HIV/AIDS including several scientists who denied that HIV caused AIDS.

Big Pharma conspiracy theories are conspiracy theories which claim that pharmaceutical companies, especially large corporations, act in sinister and secretive ways, such as concealing effective treatments, or even intentionally causing and worsening a wide range of diseases, in pursuit of profitability, or for other nefarious reasons. Some theories have included the claim that natural alternative remedies to health problems are being suppressed, the claim that drugs for the treatment of HIV/AIDS are ineffective and harmful, the claim that a cure for all cancers has been discovered but hidden from the public, claims that COVID-19 vaccines are ineffective, and that alternative cures are available for COVID-19. In most cases the conspiracy theorists have blamed pharmaceutical companies' search for profits. A range of authors have shown these claims to be false, though some of these authors nevertheless maintain that other criticisms of the pharmaceutical industry are legitimate.

<i>Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing</i> Academic journal

Explore: The Journal of Science & Healing is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes papers on alternative medicine six times per year. It was established in 2005 and is published by Elsevier. The executive editor is faith healing advocate Larry Dossey, and the co-editors-in-chief are hypnotherapist, acupuncturist, and herbalist Benjamin Kligler, an associate professor at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine, and parapsychologist Dean Radin. The journal has been described as a "sham masquerading as a real scientific journal" which publishes "truly ridiculous studies", such as Masaru Emoto's claimed demonstration of the effect of "distant intention" on water crystal formation.

John P. Moore is an American virologist and professor at Cornell University's Weill Cornell Medicine college, known for his research on HIV/AIDS. He previously worked at the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center. A former section editor of the Journal of General Virology, he is an outspoken critic of HIV/AIDS denialism, including the work of Peter Duesberg.

Journalology is the scholarly study of all aspects of the academic publishing process. The field seeks to improve the quality of scholarly research by implementing evidence-based practices in academic publishing. The term "journalology" was coined by Stephen Lock, the former editor-in-chief of the BMJ. The first Peer Review Congress, held in 1989 in Chicago, Illinois, is considered a pivotal moment in the founding of journalology as a distinct field. The field of journalology has been influential in pushing for study pre-registration in science, particularly in clinical trials. Clinical trial registration is now expected in most countries. Journalology researchers also work to reform the peer review process.

Lola L. Cuddy is a Canadian psychologist recognized for her contributions to the field of music psychology. She is a professor emerita in the Department of Psychology at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario.

Jacques Benveniste was a French immunologist born in Paris. In 1979, he published a well-known paper on the structure of platelet-activating factor and its relationship with histamine. He was head of allergy and inflammation immunology at the French biomedical research agency INSERM.

Brainspotting is a psychotherapy technique that attempts to help people process psychological trauma or other problems via eye movements. Practitioners of this technique use a pointer to direct a client’s eye gaze in order to send signals to the brain to resolve psychological or physical concerns. Brainspotting has not been rigorously studied and has frequently been characterized as a pseudoscience or fringe medicine.

References

  1. ↑ Enserink, Martin (2010-06-25). "New Medical Hypotheses Editor Promises Not to Stir Up Controversy". Science | AAAS. Retrieved 2019-10-17. It's not a classical peer review system. I call it a Medical Hypotheses custom-made review system.
  2. ↑ "Does Manganese Inhaled From The Shower Represent A Public Health Threat?". Science Daily . 4 July 2005. Retrieved 2010-03-08.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Enserink, Martin (8 March 2010). "Elsevier Fires Journal Editor Over Paper Saying HIV Doesn't Cause AIDS". Science. Archived from the original on 12 March 2010. Retrieved 11 March 2010.
  4. 1 2 3 Nattrass, Nicoli (2009). "Still Crazy After All These Years: The Challenge of AIDS Denialism for Science". AIDS and Behavior. 14 (2): 248–51. doi:10.1007/s10461-009-9641-z. PMID   19937271. S2CID   26273036.
  5. 1 2 Abdool Karim SS, et al. (August 5, 2009). "Letter to the National Library of Medicine Literature Selection Technical Review Committee" (PDF). Aidstruth.org. Retrieved December 8, 2009.
  6. ↑ "Elsevier Announces New Medical Hypotheses Editor-In-Chief". Elsevier (Press release). 24 June 2010. Archived from the original on 11 October 2012. Retrieved 24 May 2019.
  7. ↑ "Medical Hypotheses". 2020 Journal Citation Reports. Web of Science (Science ed.). Thomson Reuters. 2021.
  8. ↑ "David Horrobin: Champion of evening primrose oil". Independent.co.uk . 17 April 2003. Archived from the original on March 13, 2010.
  9. ↑ Marks, Naomi (2003). "Was BMJ dead wrong to print critical obituary?". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 169 (1): 54. PMC   164952 .
  10. 1 2 Horrobin, David F. (1975). "Ideas in biomedical science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses". Medical Hypotheses. 1 (1): 1–2. doi:10.1016/0306-9877(75)90032-8. PMID   1202322.
  11. 1 2 "Elsevier Fires Journal Editor Over Paper Saying HIV Doesn't Cause AIDS". Chronicle of Higher Education . 10 March 2010. Retrieved 10 March 2010.
  12. 1 2 Bruce Charlton (31 March 2011). "David Horrobin's letter handing-over Medical Hypotheses editorship". medicalhypotheses.blogspot.co.uk.
  13. ↑ Medical Hypotheses editorial board. Elsevier. 2008-07-31. Retrieved 2008-08-01.
  14. ↑ "New Medical Hypotheses Editor Promises Not to Stir Up Controversy" Martin Enserink, ScienceInsider, 25 June 2010.
  15. ↑ "Medical Hypotheses". Elsevier. 2008-07-31. Retrieved 2008-08-01.
  16. ↑ "Medical hypotheses. - NLM Catalog - NCBI". www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Retrieved 2023-08-02.
  17. ↑ according to Web of Science
  18. ↑ Dantzer, Robert (1999). Cytokines, Stress, and Depression. Springer. pp. v, 259. ISBN   978-0-306-46135-4.
  19. ↑ Song, Cai (2000). Fundamentals of Psychoneuroimmunology. John Wiley and Sons. p. 88. ISBN   978-0-471-98671-3.
  20. ↑ Rapaka, Rao S. (2008). Drug Addiction: From Basic Research to Therapy. Springer. p. 206. ISBN   978-0-387-76677-5.
  21. ↑ Abrahams, Marc (15 November 2004). "Heel thyself". The Guardian . Retrieved 14 December 2013.
  22. ↑ Komarova, Svetlana V. (2006). "A moat around castle walls". Medical Hypotheses. 67 (4): 698–701. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2006.03.021. PMID   16690220.
  23. 1 2 3 Goldacre, Ben (11 September 2009). "Peer review is flawed but the best we've got". The Guardian . UK.
  24. ↑ Zarrintan, Sina (2008). "Ejaculation as a potential treatment of nasal congestion in mature males". Medical Hypotheses. 71 (2): 308. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.03.010. PMID   18434036.
  25. ↑ Fakhree, Mohammad Amin Abolghassemi (2008). "Ejaculation as a treatment for nasal congestion in men is inconvenient, unreliable and potentially hazardous". Medical Hypotheses. 71 (5): 809. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.07.022. PMID   18723292.
  26. ↑ Sawer, Patrick (28 February 2009). "Revealed: The secrets of belly button fluff". The Daily Telegraph. London.
  27. ↑ Abrahams, Marc (25 August 2009). "Gentlemen prefer blondes: fact?". The Guardian. UK. Retrieved 2010-03-09.
  28. ↑ Charlton, Bruce G. (2008). "A book of ideas collected from Medical Hypotheses: Death can be cured by Roger Dobson". Medical Hypotheses. 70 (5): 905–9. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2008.01.016. PMID   18280670.
  29. ↑ Stein, John (2004). "David Horrobin (1939–2003): A memoir". Prostaglandins, Leukotrienes and Essential Fatty Acids. 70 (4): 339–43. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2004.01.001 . PMID   15085824.
  30. ↑ Steinhauser, Georg; Adlassnig, Wolfram; Risch, Jesaka Ahau; Anderlini, Serena; Arguriou, Petros; Armendariz, Aaron Zolen; Bains, William; Baker, Clark; Barnes, Martin (October 2012). "Peer review versus editorial review and their role in innovative science". Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 33 (5): 359–376. doi:10.1007/s11017-012-9233-1. ISSN   1386-7415. PMID   23054375. S2CID   254788442.
  31. 1 2 Duesberg, Peter H.; Nicholson, Joshua M.; Rasnick, David; Fiala, Christian; Bauer, Henry H. (2009). "WITHDRAWN: HIV-AIDS hypothesis out of touch with South African AIDS - A new perspective". Medical Hypotheses. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2009.06.024. PMID   19619953.
  32. ↑ Nattrass, N (May 2011). "Defending the boundaries of science: AIDS denialism, peer review and the Medical Hypotheses saga". Sociology of Health & Illness. 33 (4): 507–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01312.x. PMID   21314689.
  33. ↑ "Elsevier retracts Duesberg's AIDS Denialist article". www.aidstruth.org. 9 September 2009.
  34. ↑ Martin Enserink, Elsevier to Editor: Change Controversial Journal or Resign Archived 2010-03-12 at the Wayback Machine . Science , March 8, 2010
  35. ↑ Corbyn, Zoë (23 January 2010). "Publisher attempts to rein in radical medical journal". Times Higher Education . UK.
  36. ↑ Charlton, Bruce (11 May 2010). "Medical Hypotheses: RIP Medical Hypotheses". medicalhypotheses.blogspot.com.
  37. ↑ "Elsevier Announces New Medical Hypotheses Editor-In-Chief". www.elsevier.com. Retrieved 2018-12-08.
  38. ↑ Richmond, C. (2003). "David Horrobin". BMJ. 326 (7394): 885. doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7394.885. PMC   1125787 .
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.