Square Leg

Last updated
'Square Leg' target plot Square leg.gif
'Square Leg' target plot
Square leg is also a fielding position in cricket; see Fielding (cricket).

Square Leg was a 1980 British government home defence Command Post and field exercise, which tested the Transition to War and Home Defence roles of the Ministry of Defence and British government. Part of the exercise involved a mock nuclear attack on Britain. It was assumed that 131 nuclear weapons would fall on Britain with a total yield of 205 megatons (69 ground burst; 62 air burst) [1] with yields of 500 KT to 3 MT. [2] That was felt to be a reasonably realistic scenario, but the report stated that a total strike in excess of 1,000 megatons would be likely.

Contents

Mortality was estimated at 29 million (53 percent of the population), serious injuries at 7 million (12 percent), and short-term survivors at 19 million (35 percent).

Square Leg was criticised for a number of reasons: the weapons used were exclusively in the high-yield megaton range, with an average of 1.5 megatons per bomb, but a realistic attack based on known Soviet capabilities would have seen mixed weapons yields, including many missile-based warheads in the low-hundred-kiloton range. Also, no targets in Inner London are attacked (for example, Whitehall, the centre of British government); towns such as Eastbourne are hit for no obvious reason. [3]

Operation Square Leg was one of the exercises used to estimate the destructiveness of a Soviet nuclear attack in the 1984 BBC production Threads .

Exercise Square Leg: main events and civil and armed forces actions

Transition to War

The following table shows the hypothetical pre-strike event list drawn from the national Main Event List for Square Leg, testing the Transition to War stage. [4]

DateEvent
15 August Cabinet instructs all departments and specified authorities to review their plans for Transition to War.
16 AugustFuel rationing imposed.
27 August Government requests preparations to be made to remove art treasures.
31 AugustIndustrial unrest and large-scale activity by extreme left- and right-wing parties.
1 SeptemberConsiderable cross-Channel movement into the UK by expatriate families on a self-evacuation basis.
7 September Prime Minister Speaks to nation on TV/radio.
9 SeptemberSecretary of State authorizes power of direction over British Airways
11 SeptemberPrime Minister again speaks to nation.
12 SeptemberProtect and Survive’ instructions issued through the media.

Cabinet approves Queen's Order 2.

Directed food buying (by government departments, police, and military services, etc.)

Noticeable rundown of industry.

Local authorities, MP's, police and the services swamped with offers of help in forming some sort of civil defence/Home Guard organisation.

13 SeptemberPrime Minister again speaks to nation.

Panic food buying breaks out in some areas.

15 SeptemberGeneral Alert and war declared. Fighting breaks out on continent. Conventional bombing on defence related targets in UK. Public reaction to bombing is mixed... those living in high-rise flats and in areas generally thought to be obvious targets leave home quickly. Industry seriously affected. Schools close in afternoon.
17 SeptemberGovernment authorises local authorities to man their wartime headquarters.

Public passenger transport operating at fifty per cent of capacity.

Government orders manning of headquarters in the Regions.

19 September Attack Warning Red 11.55 am. Nuclear strike starts at 12.01 pm.

205 Megatons total fall on the UK. 131 nuclear weapons (69 ground burst; 62 air burst).

Mortality at 29 million (53 percent of the population), serious injuries at 7 million (12 percent), and short-term survivors at 19 million (35 percent).

Survival

The 'survival' stage details the events that occurred post nuclear attack, based on extracts from the War Diary of Warwickshire County that was used during Square Leg. [4]

DateEvent
20 SeptemberDaily food requirements: 680,700 rations. Eighteen thousand people (in refugee camps) suffering third degree burns. Isolated reports of refugees leaving West Midlands area.
22 SeptemberCasualty aid points swamped. Hospitals and improvised hospitals full.

Decision taken to conserve police strength with a view to deployment of Police Support Units later.

23 SeptemberCommence mass advise to achieve public order.

Reappraise triage. Request medical aid from military.

24 SeptemberEstablish additional casualty aid points close to existing where possible. Commit to home nursing casualties who will probably die. Commence grave-digging operations. (Transport) Remove dead from casualty aid points; remove dead from damaged areas as radiation levels permit.

Fire situation in county under control.

25 SeptemberIdentify rationing levels of food and water. Identify additional rationing requirements for workers. Flow of refugees from the West Midlands is indicated; 31,000 to North Warwickshire, 12,000 to South Warwickshire.
27 SeptemberCasualty figures Rugby area is indicated 30,000 plus estimate, Nuneaton area 17,000 plus. Large numbers of persons suffering first stages of radiation sickness. Arrange for establishment of decontamination units. Consider variations to law- liaise with police.
28 SeptemberEstimate 100,000 plus refugees coming from West Midlands- most injured/shocked/irradiated. Consider disinfection in Rugby/Coventry area to avert disease. Liaise with military for aircraft for spraying. Control of refugees in the west of the county impossible at this date.

(Via Wartime Broadcasting System) advise public on measures being taken to alleviate rioting and looting. Produce advice to encourage 'Good Neighbourly' behaviour towards refugees. Advise public with regard to disposal of dead bodies. Advise populace not to leave their area.

29 SeptemberNumbers increasing at casualty aid points, priority being given to savable under- thirties. Anticipate refugee figures to be 200,000 plus. Further requests to Sub- Regional HQ or additional food; SRHQ (sub regional headquarters) directive received- conserve food.
30 SeptemberArrange collection of food from Buffer Depots. Liaise with police and military for convoy guards. Food to be held and guarded in district stores. Deaths becoming a serious problem, liaise with transport and works for speedier removal of bodies from casualty aid points. Advise public on action to be taken re looting- particularly theft of food. Call for volunteers to assist with transport and work tasks.
31 SeptemberNotifications from SRHQ; twenty-five per cent food requirements for refugees to come from local Buffer Depots. Police Support Units established and deployed to areas where refugees are known to be located. Consider establishment of interim police control in known trouble areas,
1 OctoberFeeding to commence at 1800 hrs. Calorific content of meals will be six hundred + one pint of water (non-workers), 800 + two pints of water (workers). Meals provided for infant feeding totally inadequate, request additional supplies. Known casualty figures 37,000; seriously injured 67,000. Radiation sickness entering the third stage. Disease control absolute priority. All Essential Service Routes cleared. Identify and prepare additional burial resources. Advise public on location and times Feeding Centres will be open, safe routes to them (and) emphasize subsistence level of feeding in operation.

Recovery

The 'recovery' phase reports are drawn from the Gloucestershire log of requests for military support. [4]

DateRequest to military staffResponse
3 OctoberRequest for air reconnaissance at Little Rissington food depot.No response.
Provide armed troops to assist police at ten locations on M5 Motorway.Thirty men deployed.
Provide coils of barbed wire.Barbed wire requested.
Provide armed troops to assist troops at Gloucester to:

(a) quell disturbance involving eight thousand persons.

(b) guard a food warehouse at Hare Lane.

Twenty-five troops dispatched.
Provide ambulances, trained first aid personnel and medical supplies.No ambulances, trained first aid personnel or medical supplies available. Some vehicle only drivers.
Provide armed troops to assist police with law and order problems at Cirencester, Cinderford, Lydney and Newnham.Thirty men made available for Cirencester. Due to radiation hazard, (it is) not considered effective to send armed parties into other areas at this time.
Provide armed guards to secure MAFF warehouse.County Military HQ requested AFHQ 7 to provide assistance from east of country due to radiation levels.
4 OctoberProvide assistance to police at Gloucester to deal with law and order problem.Fifteen men from Hare Lane detailed for this task.
Secure and guard a food warehouse at Cirencester.Twenty armed men dispatched from Innsworth at 0930 hrs.
Provide guards at twelve food supply and cooking centres throughout the country. Provide escorts on ten food supply vehicles.Five armed guards provided at each location. Two armed guards provided for each vehicle.
Assist police to prevent hostile crowd gaining access to Gloucester District Wartime HQ.Twenty armed men made available.
Assist police at GCHQ (Government Communications Headquarters in Cheltenham) which is under attack by looters and refugees.Two mechanized platoons dispatched at 1400 hrs.
Accommodate five thousand homeless at RAF Innsworth.Cannot accommodate at RAF Innsworth but could take four thousand two hundred at RAF Quedgely. Vehicles available at Aschurch, but no drivers or fuel.
Provide hygiene and sanitation teams and equipment at Cheltenham. Provide rodenticides and disinfectants.Unable to assist.
Provide security patrols and barbed wire at Special Rest Centre at Stroud for suspected disease-carrying refugees.Two platoons dispatched to Stroud. No stocks of barbed wire available.
Provide assistance to Ministry of Agriculture officers who have been prevented by hostile crowd from arranging the dispatch of food from a market garden.1630hrs. Wessex helicopter and twelve soldiers sent to scene.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapon</span> Explosive weapon that utilizes nuclear reactions

A nuclear weapon is an explosive device that derives its destructive force from nuclear reactions, either fission or a combination of fission and fusion reactions, producing a nuclear explosion. Both bomb types release large quantities of energy from relatively small amounts of matter.

<i>Threads</i> (1984 film) 1984 British-Australian apocalyptic war drama television film

Threads is a 1984 British-Australian apocalyptic war drama television film jointly produced by the BBC, Nine Network and Western-World Television Inc. Written by Barry Hines and directed and produced by Mick Jackson, it is a dramatic account of nuclear war and its effects in Britain, specifically on the city of Sheffield in Northern England. The plot centres on two families as a confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union erupts. As the nuclear exchange between NATO and the Warsaw Pact begins, the film depicts the medical, economic, social and environmental consequences of nuclear war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear warfare</span> Military conflict that deploys nuclear weaponry

Nuclear warfare, also known as atomic warfare, is a military conflict or prepared political strategy that deploys nuclear weaponry. Nuclear weapons are weapons of mass destruction; in contrast to conventional warfare, nuclear warfare can produce destruction in a much shorter time and can have a long-lasting radiological result. A major nuclear exchange would likely have long-term effects, primarily from the fallout released, and could also lead to secondary effects, such as "nuclear winter", nuclear famine, and societal collapse. A global thermonuclear war with Cold War-era stockpiles, or even with the current smaller stockpiles, may lead to various scenarios including the extinction of the human species.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First strike (nuclear strategy)</span> Preemptive attack using nuclear weapons

In nuclear strategy, a first strike or preemptive strike is a preemptive surprise attack employing overwhelming force. First strike capability is a country's ability to defeat another nuclear power by destroying its arsenal to the point where the attacking country can survive the weakened retaliation while the opposing side is left unable to continue war. The preferred methodology is to attack the opponent's strategic nuclear weapon facilities, command and control sites, and storage depots first. The strategy is called counterforce.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear bunker buster</span> Earth-penetrating nuclear weapon

A nuclear bunker buster, also known as an earth-penetrating weapon (EPW), is the nuclear equivalent of the conventional bunker buster. The non-nuclear component of the weapon is designed to penetrate soil, rock, or concrete to deliver a nuclear warhead to an underground target. These weapons would be used to destroy hardened, underground military bunkers or other below-ground facilities. An underground explosion releases a larger fraction of its energy into the ground, compared to a surface burst or air burst explosion at or above the surface, and so can destroy an underground target using a lower explosive yield. This in turn could lead to a reduced amount of radioactive fallout. However, it is unlikely that the explosion would be completely contained underground. As a result, significant amounts of rock and soil would be rendered radioactive and lofted as dust or vapor into the atmosphere, generating significant fallout.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World War III</span> Hypothetical future global conflict

World War III, World War 3, WWIII, WW3, or the Third World War are the names given to a hypothetical global conflict subsequent to World War I and World War II. The term has been in use since as early as 1941. Some apply it loosely to limited or more minor conflicts such as the Cold War or the war on terror. In contrast, others assume that such a conflict would surpass prior world wars in both scope and destructive impact.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Effects of nuclear explosions</span> Type and severity of damage caused by nuclear weapons

The effects of a nuclear explosion on its immediate vicinity are typically much more destructive and multifaceted than those caused by conventional explosives. In most cases, the energy released from a nuclear weapon detonated within the lower atmosphere can be approximately divided into four basic categories:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Duck and cover</span> Suggested method of personal protection against the effects of a nuclear explosion

"Duck and cover" is a method of personal protection against the effects of a nuclear explosion. Ducking and covering is useful in offering a degree of protection to personnel located outside the radius of the nuclear fireball but still within sufficient range of the nuclear explosion that standing upright and uncovered is likely to cause serious injury or death. In the most literal interpretation, the focus of the maneuver is primarily on protective actions one can take during the first few crucial seconds-to-minutes after the event, while the film of the same name and a full encompassing of the advice also cater to providing protection up to weeks after the event.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elugelab</span> Former island in the Pacific Ocean

Elugelab, or Elugelap, was an island, part of the Enewetak Atoll in the Marshall Islands. It was destroyed by the world's first true hydrogen bomb test on 1 November 1952, a test which was codenamed shot "Mike" of Operation Ivy. Prior to being destroyed, the island was described as "just another small naked island of the atoll".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear weapons of the United Kingdom</span> 3rd country to develop nuclear weapons

In 1952, the United Kingdom became the third country to develop and test nuclear weapons, and is one of the five nuclear-weapon states under the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation</span>

The United Kingdom Warning and Monitoring Organisation (UKWMO) was a British civilian organisation operating to provide UK military and civilian authorities with data on nuclear explosions and forecasts of fallout across the country in the event of nuclear war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seven Days to the River Rhine</span> Soviet military simulation exercise

Seven Days to the River Rhine was a top-secret military simulation exercise developed at least since 1964 by the Warsaw Pact. It depicted the Soviet Bloc's vision of a seven-day nuclear war between NATO and Warsaw Pact forces.

Philip Jarvis Dolan was an American physicist. He graduated from West Point in 1945, was assigned to the Manhattan Project in Los Alamos in 1948, and received his MSc in physics from the University of Virginia in 1956.

A salted bomb is a nuclear weapon designed to function as a radiological weapon by producing larger quantities of radioactive fallout than unsalted nuclear arms. This fallout can render a large area uninhabitable. The term is derived both from the means of their manufacture, which involves the incorporation of additional elements to a standard atomic weapon, and from the expression "to salt the earth", meaning to render an area uninhabitable for generations. The idea originated with Hungarian-American physicist Leo Szilard, in February 1950. His intent was not to propose that such a weapon be built, but to show that nuclear weapon technology would soon reach the point where it could end human life on Earth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atomic Weapons Detection Recognition and Estimation of Yield</span>

Atomic Weapons Detection Recognition and Estimation of Yield known by the acronym AWDREY was a desk-mounted automatic detection instrument, located at 12 of the 25 Royal Observer Corps (ROC) controls, across the United Kingdom, during the Cold War. The instruments would have detected any nuclear explosions and indicated the estimated size in megatons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Project E</span> Cold War project for the US to provide the UK with nuclear weapons

Project E was a joint project between the United States and the United Kingdom during the Cold War to provide nuclear weapons to the Royal Air Force (RAF) until sufficient British nuclear weapons became available. It was subsequently expanded to provide similar arrangements for the British Army of the Rhine. A maritime version of Project E known as Project N provided nuclear depth bombs used by the RAF Coastal Command.

In nuclear strategy, a counterforce target is one that has a military value, such as a launch silo for intercontinental ballistic missiles, an airbase at which nuclear-armed bombers are stationed, a homeport for ballistic missile submarines, or a command and control installation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear close calls</span> List of incidents which could have led to a nuclear exchange

A nuclear close call is an incident that might have led to at least one unintended nuclear detonation or explosion, but did not. These incidents typically involve a perceived imminent threat to a nuclear-armed country which could lead to retaliatory strikes against the perceived aggressor. The damage caused by international nuclear exchange is not necessarily limited to the participating countries, as the hypothesized rapid climate change associated with even small-scale regional nuclear war could threaten food production worldwide—a scenario known as nuclear famine. There have also been a number of accidents involving nuclear weapons, such as crashes of nuclear armed aircraft.

Dust defense, sometimes called environmental defense, was a proposed anti-ballistic missile (ABM) system considered for protecting both Minuteman and MX Peacekeeper missile silos from Soviet attack.

Hard Rock was a British civil defence exercise planned by the Conservative government to take place in September–October 1982. One of a series of regular national civil defence exercises, it followed Square Leg in 1980. As the public reaction to the scale of devastation forecast in Square Leg was poor, the planner deliberately scaled down the number of warheads supposed for Hard Rock. Despite this, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND), who opposed nuclear warfare and were against civil defence exercises, suggested that such an attack as Hard Rock anticipated would have led to the deaths of 12.5 million people.

References

Footnotes

  1. Doomsday, Britain after Nuclear Attack, p. 102
  2. "UK | Fallout Warning". falloutwarning.wordpress.com. Archived from the original on 3 January 2014. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
  3. Doomsday, Britain after Nuclear Attack, p. 105
  4. 1 2 3 Campbell, Duncan (1983). War Plan UK. HarperCollins Distribution Services. p. 33. ISBN   0586084797.