Stolen Valor Act of 2005

Last updated
Stolen Valor Act of 2005
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long titleAn Act to amend title 18, United States Code, to enhance protections relating to the reputation and meaning of the Medal of Honor and other military decorations and awards, and for other purposes.
Enacted bythe 109th United States Congress
EffectiveDecember 20, 2006, to June 28, 2012
Citations
Public law Pub. L. Tooltip Public Law (United States)  109–437 (text) (PDF)
Statutes at Large 120  Stat.   3266–3267
Legislative history
United States Supreme Court cases
Struck down by United States v. Alvarez in a 6–3 decision on June 28, 2012

The Stolen Valor Act of 2005, signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 20, 2006, [1] was a U.S. law that broadened the provisions of previous U.S. law addressing the unauthorized wear, manufacture, or sale of any military decorations and medals. The law made it a federal misdemeanor to falsely represent oneself as having received any U.S. military decoration or medal. If convicted, defendants might have been imprisoned for up to six months, unless the decoration lied about is the Medal of Honor, in which case imprisonment could have been up to one year. In United States v. Alvarez (2012), the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was an unconstitutional abridgment of the freedom of speech under the First Amendment–striking down the law in a 6 to 3 decision.

Contents

Description

The Act was first introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on July 19, 2005, by Representative John Salazar, a Democrat from Colorado, as H.R. 3352. [2] [3] It was introduced in the Senate by Senator Kent Conrad, a Democrat from North Dakota, on November 10, 2005, as S. 1998. [4] [5] The Senate version was passed unanimously on September 7, 2006. [5] [6] The House passed the Senate version, S. 1998, on December 6, 2006. [7]

The purpose of the Act was to strengthen the provisions of federal law (18 U.S.C. § 704 [8] ) by broadening its scope and strengthening penalties. Specific new provisions in the Act included:

The Act made it illegal for unauthorized persons to wear, buy, sell, barter, trade, or manufacture "any decoration or medal authorized by Congress for the armed forces of the United States, or any of the service medals or badges awarded to the members of such forces." In the 18 months after the act was enacted, the Chicago Tribune estimated there were twenty prosecutions. The number increased as awareness of the law spread. [9]

The Act was passed to address the issue of persons claiming to have been awarded military awards to which they were not entitled and exploiting their deception for personal gain. For example, as of June 2, 2006, there were only 120 living Medal of Honor recipients, but there were far more known imposters. [10] [11] [12] There were also large numbers of people fraudulently claiming to be Navy SEALS [13] [14] and Army Special Forces, [15] among others.

The Orders and Medals Society of America (OMSA), an organization of collectors, opposed the version of the bill that passed. OMSA was concerned about the changes to 18 USC [16] that in its judgment implied that any movement or exchange of medals was illegal. [17] [18]

United States v. Strandlof

Rick Strandlof, founder of Colorado Veterans Alliance, was accused of seeking to raise funds for that organization by posing as Marine Captain "Rick Duncan" and claiming to have received a Silver Star and Purple Heart in the Iraq War. In January 2010, he challenged the constitutionality of the Stolen Valor Act in U.S. District Court in Denver, Colorado. Strandlof's attorney believed the law was too vague and that "protecting the reputation of military decorations is insufficient to survive [ strict scrutiny ]", a level of judicial review that requires the government to justify any limitation it places on free speech. [19] The Rutherford Institute, a Virginia-based civil liberties group, joined in the case on January 20, 2010. "Such expression remains within the presumptive protection afforded pure speech by the First Amendment," the institute's attorney wrote. "As such, the Stolen Valor Act is an unconstitutional restraint on the freedom of speech." [19]

On July 16, 2010, a federal judge in Denver ruled the Stolen Valor Act is "facially unconstitutional" because it violates free speech and dismissed the criminal case against Strandlof who lied about being an Iraq war veteran. [20] Strandlof, 32, was charged with five misdemeanors related to violating the Act – specifically, making false claims about receiving military decorations.

U.S. District Judge Robert E. Blackburn issued his decision rejecting the prosecution's argument that lying about having military medals dilutes their meaning and significance. "This wholly unsubstantiated assertion is, frankly, shocking and, indeed, unintentionally insulting to the profound sacrifices of military personnel the Stolen Valor Act purports to honor," Blackburn wrote. "To suggest that the battlefield heroism of our servicemen and women is motivated in any way, let alone in a compelling way, by considerations of whether a medal may be awarded simply defies my comprehension." [21] Attorney Chris Beall, who filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the ACLU of Colorado, said the decision is remarkable. "The First Amendment protects speech we don't like," he said. "We don't need the First Amendment for speech people like. The government cannot criminalize a statement simply because it is false, no matter how important the statement is." Beall points out Strandlof wasn't charged with stealing money meant for the veterans group, adding that laws are already in place for those crimes. "That's plain-old, regular-vanilla everyday fraud, and we do prosecute that every day," he said. "Congress does not need a special statute to prevent people from using false claims of valor in order to prevent fraud." [21] John Wagner, executive director of the Warrior Legacy Foundation, a veterans group that lobbied for Strandlof's prosecution, said he will push for an appeal. A spokesman for the U.S. attorney in Denver said prosecutors are reviewing the decision and haven't decided whether to appeal. The spokesman said that decision would be made by the U.S. Justice Department in Washington and prosecutors in Denver. [22]

On January 27, 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit overruled the district court and reinstated the charges against Strandlof. Two judges on the three-judge panel held that false statements are not worthy of constitutional protection. In dissent, Judge Jerome Holmes wrote that the majority was reading language into the act to justify upholding it. [23] On July 2, 2012, the Tenth Circuit vacated its previous opinion, writing, "In light of United States v. Alvarez , we vacate both the opinion and the judgment issued on January 27, 2012." [24]

United States v. Alvarez

Initially the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided Alvarez on August 17, 2010, ruling the Stolen Valor Act unconstitutional. [25] Specifically, in the 2–1 decision, Judge Milan Smith stated for the court that lies not within traditionally unprotected subsets of false facts are subject to First Amendment protection, the Stolen Valor Act is not subject to defamation law precedent, and there's no compelling reason for government interest in banning such lies. [26]

"The right to speak and write whatever one chooses – including, to some degree, worthless, offensive and demonstrable untruths – without cowering in fear of a powerful government is, in our view, an essential component of the protection afforded by the First Amendment," Judge Smith wrote. If lying about a medal can be classified as a crime, Smith said, so many everyday lies could become criminal acts, such as lying about one's age, misrepresenting one's financial status on Facebook, or telling one's mother falsehoods about drinking, smoking, or sex. [27]

On March 21, 2011, a majority of judges in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit refused to rehear the Alvarez case en banc. In the order refusing to hear the case en banc, Judge Alex Kozinski issued a lengthy concurrence, responding to critics of the decision and asserting that the First Amendment covers most varieties of lying and misrepresentation, where not otherwise unprotected by the First Amendment under the traditional view. [28] The traditional view holds that only certain varieties of speech are exempt from standard constitutional scrutiny such as fraud, fighting words, defamation, incitement (including to a “clear and present danger”), and speech attendant to the commission of a crime. Judge Diarmuid O'Scannlain dissented from the denial of rehearing arguing that false representations are not per se entitled to First Amendment protection.

On October 17, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to consider the validity of the law. [29] On June 28, 2012, the Supreme Court found the law unconstitutional in a 6 to 3 decision, with Justices Scalia, Thomas and Alito dissenting. [30] [31] In United States v. Alvarez the majority held that the Stolen Valor Act was an unconstitutional abridgment of the freedom of speech under the First Amendment. [30] [31]

Legacy

Justice Anthony Kennedy's opinion in United States v. Alvarez cited that "a Government-created database" is "at least one less speech-restrictive means by which the Government could likely protect the integrity of the military award system." In his view, "were a database accessible through the Internet, it would be easy to verify and expose false claims." [32] In response, President Obama announced the creation of the DoD valor database, or valor.defense.gov in July 2012, saying "this week, we will launch a new website, a living memorial, so the American people can see who’s been awarded our nation’s highest honors . . . because no American hero should ever have their valor stolen.” [33] The DoD valor database was unveiled on July 25, 2012. [34] Additionally, in response Representative Joe Heck sponsored the Stolen Valor Act of 2012 to criminalize profiting by falsely claiming to have received a military medal for serving in combat, which passed with a vote of 410 to 3; [35] a companion bill was sponsored by Senator Jim Webb, which passed as an amendment of the defense authorization bill. [36] In the 113th Congress Representative Heck reintroduced the modified act, receiving 65 cosponsors. [37]

The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 was signed by President Barack Obama on June 3, 2013. [38] The Act makes it a federal crime to fraudulently claim to be a recipient of certain military decorations or medals in order to obtain money, property, or other tangible benefit. [39] [40]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">First Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1791 amendment limiting government restriction of civil rights

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution prevents the government from making laws that: regulate an establishment of religion; prohibit the free exercise of religion; abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, as one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Defense of Marriage Act</span> 1996 U.S. federal law, repealed in 2022

The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was a United States federal law passed by the 104th United States Congress and signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 21, 1996. It banned federal recognition of same-sex marriage by limiting the definition of marriage to the union of one man and one woman, and it further allowed states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages granted under the laws of other states.

The Federal Marriage Amendment (FMA), also referred to by proponents as the Marriage Protection Amendment, was a proposed amendment to the United States Constitution that would legally define marriage as a union of one man and one woman. The FMA would also prevent judicial extension of marriage rights to same-sex (gay) or other unmarried homosexual couples.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prisoner of War Medal</span> Award

The Prisoner of War Medal is a military award of the United States Armed Forces which was authorized by Congress and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan on 8 November 1985. The United States Code citation for the POW Medal statute is 10 U.S.C. § 1128.

The Flag Desecration Amendment is a proposed addition to the Constitution of the United States that would allow the U.S. Congress to prohibit by statute and provide punishment for the physical "desecration" of the flag of the United States. The concept of flag desecration continues to provoke a heated debate over protecting a national symbol, preserving free speech, and upholding the liberty said to be represented by that national symbol. While the proposal has been passed by the two-thirds majority required in the House of Representatives several times, it has not passed the Senate by the same super-majority and has often not come to a vote in the Senate despite its introduction several times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NSA warrantless surveillance (2001–2007)</span> Part of Terrorist Surveillance Program

NSA warrantless surveillance — also commonly referred to as "warrantless-wiretapping" or "-wiretaps" — was the surveillance of persons within the United States, including U.S. citizens, during the collection of notionally foreign intelligence by the National Security Agency (NSA) as part of the Terrorist Surveillance Program. In late 2001, the NSA was authorized to monitor, without obtaining a FISA warrant, phone calls, Internet activities, text messages and other forms of communication involving any party believed by the NSA to be outside the U.S., even if the other end of the communication lays within the U.S.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fred Borch</span> American lawyer

Colonel Frederic L. Borch is a career United States Army attorney with a master's degree in national security studies, who served as chief prosecutor of the Guantanamo military commissions. He resigned his commission in August 2005 after three prosecutors complained that he had rigged the system against providing due process to defendants. He was replaced by Robert L. Swann

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Timothy Tymkovich</span> American judge (born 1956)

Timothy Michael Tymkovich is a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Milan Smith</span> American judge (born 1942)

Milan Dale Smith Jr. is an American attorney and jurist serving as a United States circuit judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Smith's brother, Gordon H. Smith, was a Republican U.S. Senator from 1997 to 2009. Milan Smith is neither a Republican nor a Democrat.

The Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 (DTA) is an Act of the United States Congress that was signed into law by President George W. Bush on December 30, 2005. Offered as an amendment to a supplemental defense spending bill, it contains provisions relating to treatment of persons in custody of the Department of Defense, and administration of detainees held in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, including:

<i>Cook v. Gates</i> American legal case

Cook v. Gates, 528 F.3d 42, is a decision on July 9, 2008, of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit that upheld the "Don't ask, Don't tell" (DADT) policy against due process and equal protection Fifth Amendment challenges and a free speech challenge under the First Amendment, and which found that no earlier Supreme Court decision held that sexual orientation is a suspect or quasi-suspect classification.

United States v. Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709 (2012), is a landmark decision in which the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was unconstitutional. The Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was a federal law that criminalized false statements about having a military medal. It had been passed by Congress as an effort to stem instances where people falsely claimed to have earned the medal in an attempt to protect the valor of legitimate recipients. A 6–3 majority of the Supreme Court agreed that the law was unconstitutional and violated the free speech protections under the First Amendment. Despite reaffirming the opinion that was previously issued by the Ninth Circuit, it could not agree on a single rationale. Four justices concluded that a statement's falsity is not enough, by itself, to exclude speech from First Amendment protection. Another two justices concluded that while false statements were entitled to some protection, the Stolen Valor Act of 2005 was invalid because it could have achieved its objectives in less restrictive ways.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States free speech exceptions</span> Categories of free speech not protected by the First Amendment

In the United States, some categories of speech are not protected by the First Amendment. According to the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Constitution protects free speech while allowing limitations on certain categories of speech.

In United States constitutional law, false statements of fact are assertions, which are ostensibly facts, that are false. Such statements are not always protected by the First Amendment. Often, this is due to laws against defamation, that is making statements that harm the reputation of another. In those cases, freedom of speech comes into conflict with the right to privacy. Because it is almost impossible for someone to be absolutely sure that what they say is true, a party who makes a false claim isn't always liable. Whether such speech is protected depends on the situation. The standards of such protection have evolved over time from a body of Supreme Court rulings.

valor.defense.gov, also called U.S. Military Awards for Valor, is a website published by the United States Department of Defense established in 2012 to track recipients of awards and decorations of the United States military. It currently contains the complete list of Medal of Honor recipients for actions since the September 11, 2001 attacks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stolen Valor Act of 2013</span> US federal law that criminalizes falsely claiming military honors to obtain benefits

The Stolen Valor Act of 2013 is a United States federal law that was passed by the 113th United States Congress. The law amends the federal criminal code to make it a crime for a person to fraudulently claim having received a valor award specified in the Act, with the intention of obtaining money, property, or other tangible benefit by convincing another that he or she received the award.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medal of Honor</span> Highest award in the United States Armed Forces

The Medal of Honor (MOH) is the United States Armed Forces' highest military decoration and is awarded to recognize American soldiers, sailors, marines, airmen, guardians and coast guardsmen who have distinguished themselves by acts of valor. The medal is normally awarded by the President of the United States and is presented "in the name of the United States Congress."

Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus, 573 U.S. 149 (2014), is a United States Supreme Court case.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Military impostor</span> Person who lies about military service

A military impostor is a person who makes false claims about their military service in civilian life. This includes claims by people that have never been in the military as well as lies or embellishments by genuine veterans. Some individuals who do this also wear privately obtained uniforms or medals which were never officially issued to them.

References

  1. ↑ Anne C. Mulkern (December 20, 2006). "Rep. Salazar's bill on falsely claiming medals now a law". The Denver Post. Retrieved 2006-12-22.
  2. ↑ "H.R. 3352: Stolen Valor Act of 2005". 109th U.S. Congress (2005-2006). GovTrak.us. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  3. 1 2 "H.R. 3352" (PDF). 109th U.S. Congress (2005-2006). GovTrak.us. Retrieved 2006-12-10.[ permanent dead link ]
  4. ↑ "S. 1998: Stolen Valor Act of 2005". 109th U.S. Congress (2005-2006). GovTrak.us. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  5. 1 2 3 "S. 1998" (PDF). 109th U.S. Congress (2005-2006). GovTrak.us. Retrieved 2006-12-10.[ permanent dead link ]
  6. ↑ "S. 1998 In The House Of Representatives". 109th U.S. Congress (2005-2006). TheOrator.com. Sep 8, 2006. Archived from the original on 2007-05-26. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  7. ↑ Sterner, C. Douglas (Dec 7, 2006). "The Stolen Valor Act of 2005". POWnet.org. Archived from the original on 2007-01-21. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  8. ↑ 18 U.S.C.   § 704
  9. ↑ Crewdson, John (May 27, 2008). "Fake claims of war heroics a federal offense". Chicago Tribune.
  10. ↑ "Living Recipients". Congressional Medal of Honor Society. Retrieved 2013-01-08.
  11. ↑ Taylor, Michael = (May 31, 1999). "Tracking Down False Heroes - Medal of Honor recipients go after impostors". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  12. ↑ Mishalov, Neil (1999). "Men Who Falsely Claim to have Received the Medal of Honor". Mishalov.com. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  13. ↑ Waterman, Steve. "Fake SEALs". stevenlwaterman.com. Archived from the original on 2006-09-16. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  14. ↑ "Wannabes Beware!". nightscribe.com. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  15. ↑ "Hunting the Phonies". specialoperations.com. Archived from the original on 2006-12-05. Retrieved 2006-12-10.
  16. ↑ "18 U.S. Code § 704 - Military medals or decorations". LII / Legal Information Institute.
  17. ↑ "OMSA President's Message on the Stolen Valor Act to all OMSA members and friends". Orders and Medals Society of America. Retrieved 2006-12-13.[ permanent dead link ]
  18. ↑ "Sample Letter to Congressman". Orders and Medals Society of America. Retrieved 2006-12-13.[ permanent dead link ]
  19. 1 2 Cardona, Felisa (January 20, 2010). "Lies from "war vet" are protected speech, civil liberties group says". The Denver Post. Retrieved January 20, 2010.
  20. ↑ Cardona, Felisa (2010-07-16). "Charge dismissed in fake hero's case, Valor Act ruled unconstitutional". The Denver Post.
  21. 1 2 Cardona, Felisa (2010-07-17). "Stolen Valor Act unconstitutional, federal judge rules". The Denver Post.
  22. ↑ "Federal judge rules law penalizing fake military heroes is unconstitutional". Fox News. 2010-07-16.
  23. ↑ Ingold, John. "10th Circuit upholds Stolen Valor Act". The Denver Post.
  24. ↑ "United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rick Glen Stradloff, a/k/a Rick Duncan, Defendant-Appellee, The American Legion; Christopher Guzelian, Amici Curiae: Order" (PDF). United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth District. July 2, 2012. Retrieved January 8, 2013.
  25. ↑ "Data" (PDF). www.ca9.uscourts.gov. 2010.
  26. ↑ [ dead link ]
  27. ↑ Egelko, Bob (2010-08-26). "Court says lying about Medal of Honor no crime". San Francisco Chronicle.
  28. ↑ "9th Circuit Opinion" (PDF).
  29. ↑ "Supreme Court to Take Up 'Stolen Valor Act'". Fox News. 2011-10-17.
  30. 1 2 Curry, Tom (June 28, 2012). "SCOTUS strikes down Stolen Valor Act". NBC Politics. Archived from the original on July 1, 2017.
  31. 1 2 Barnes, Robert; Ruane, Michael E. (June 28, 2012). "Supreme Court: Lying about military medals is protected by Constitution". The Washington Post. Retrieved June 28, 2012.
  32. ↑ "United States v. Alvarez, 567 U.S. 709 (2012)".
  33. ↑ "DOD unveils 'Stolen Valor' database". 25 July 2012.
  34. ↑ "New Website Honors Service Members' Valor". Washington, D.C.: American Forces Press Service. July 25, 2012.
  35. ↑ Maze, Rick (September 13, 2012). "House approves new Stolen Valor bill". Army Times. Retrieved December 4, 2012.
  36. ↑ Maze, Rick (3 December 2012). "Senate passes revised Stolen Valor Act". Marine Corps Times. Archived from the original on 2012-12-07. Retrieved 4 December 2012.
  37. ↑ Maze, Rick (15 January 2013). "New version of Stolen Valor bill introduced". Army Times. Retrieved 16 January 2013.
  38. ↑ "H.R.258 - Stolen Valor Act of 2013: All Actions". 113th Congress. United States Congress. Retrieved June 6, 2013.
  39. ↑ "H.R.258 - Stolen Valor Act of 2013: Text". 113th Congress. United States Congress. Retrieved December 3, 2014.
  40. ↑ Sterner, Doug; Sterner, Pam (13 October 2015). Restoring Valor: One Couple?s Mission to Expose Fraudulent War Heroes and Protect America?s Military Awards System. ISBN   978-1634502795.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.