Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Consular Relations between Germany and the United States of America

Last updated

The Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Consular Relations between Germany and the United States of America was an agreement for the improvement of relations between the U.S. and German governments, signed in Washington, D.C., on December 8, 1923. The U.S. Senate advised and consented to ratify on February 10, 1925. Ratifications were exchanged in Washington on October 14, 1925, and the treaty became effective on the same day. It was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on August 3, 1926. [1]

Contents

Background

Since the U.S. Senate refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles following the First World War, the U.S. government found itself outside of the inter-Allied arrangements made with the German government. As a result, the U.S. government began its own process of rapprochement with Berlin. As part of that process, a separate U.S.-German peace treaty was concluded in 1921. Following the conclusion of the peace treaty, diplomatic relations between the two governments were reestablished, and on December 10, 1921, the new U.S. ambassador, Ellis Loring Dresel, presented his credentials in Berlin. [2]

In late 1923, German economy collapsed under the burden of reparations, and the U.S. government viewed this as a new opportunity to improve relations in order to strengthen the German position. As a result, the friendship treaty was concluded.

Terms of the Treaty

Article 1 permitted the free travel and economic and cultural activities by U.S. nationals in Germany and German nationals in the United States. Article 2 allowed nationals of each party in the other country to sue for damages caused. Article 3 guaranteed from illegal search business facilities in each of the two countries owned by nationals from the other. Article 4 guaranteed the right of inheritance for nationals of each countries of property located in the other. Article 5 guaranteed freedom of religion for national of each country residing in the other. Article 6 permitted each of the parties to draft to its army nationals of the other country in times of war. Article 7 guaranteed favourable trade conditions for nationals of each of the parties in the other country. Article 8 provided for equality in taxation for nationals of the other party. Articles 9–11 provided for equal treatment for ships of the other party. Articles 12-15 dealt with trade provisions. Article 16 provided for the right of transit for nationals of each of the parties in the territories of the other party. Articles 17-28 regulated the work of Consuls. Article 29 included the Panama Canal within U.S. territories open to German citizens. Article 30 stipulated that nothing in the treaty can contradict the provisions of the US-German peace treaty concluded in 1921. Article 31 provided the treaty shall remain in force for ten years and will be prolonged for another year each time, unless denounced by either of the parties. Article 32 provided for ratification of the treaty and its entry into effect upon exchange of ratifications.

Aftermath

The treaty was in operation between the U.S. and the German governments until after Hitler's rise to power. On July 11, 1928, the U.S. government served a note of continuation regarding the treaty to the Secretariat of the League of Nations. Following Hitler's rise to power, relations were worsening, and on June 3, 1935, a new agreement was signed between the U.S. and German governments, which limited the operation of article 7 of the treaty, dealing with freedom of commercial activities by national of both countries. [3]

On December 11, 1941, Hitler declared war on the United States, and all treaties between the two countries became inoperative.

The validity of the treaty in view of the surrender of the German government in 1945 was questioned in the U.S. Supreme Court in Clark v. Allen. The case was about a woman named Alvina Wagner, who died in California in 1942 and bequeathed her estate to her relatives who were German nationals at the time. The property was seized by the Custodian of Enemy Property, but some of her relatives in California petitioned to the court on grounds that they were the rightful heirs, claiming that the outbreak of war nullified the stipulations in the agreement regarding the right of inheritance between nationals of the two countries contained in article 4. The Supreme Court, in a ruling delivered in 1947, eventually granted the petitioners part of the property, while leaving part of it to the Custodian. In its final ruling, the court stated: "the outbreak of war does not necessarily suspend or abrogate treaty provisions. (- - -) We do not think that the national policy expressed in the Trading with the Enemy Act, as amended, is incompatible with the right of inheritance granted German aliens under Article IV of the treaty". However, the Court demonstrated some caution by stating: "It is not for them (the courts in the US) to denounce treaties generally, en bloc. Their part it is, as one provision or another is involved in some actual controversy before them, to determine whether, alone, or by force of connection with an inseparable scheme, the provision is inconsistent with the policy or safety of the nation in the emergency of war, and hence presumably intended to be limited to times of peace". It also recognized in part the powers of the Custodian of Enemy Property to represent the interest of the heirs and thus dispose of the estate. On this issue the court stated: "For the power to vest (i.e. confiscate enemy property) is discretionary, not mandatory". Eventually, the court refused to rule generally whether the treaty's validity survived the outbreak of war, and stated: "We have no reliable evidence of the intention of the high contracting parties outside the words of the present treaty. The attitude and conduct under earlier treaties, reflecting as they did numerous contingencies and conditions, leave no sure guide to the construction of the present treaty. Where the relevant historical source and the instrument itself give no plain indication that it is to become inoperative in whole or in part on the outbreak of war, we are left to determine, as Techt v. Hughes, supra, indicates, whether the provision under which rights are asserted is incompatible with national policy in time of war. So far as the right of inheritance of realty under Article IV of the present treaty is concerned, we find no incompatibility with national policy, for reasons already given". The court also referred to the question whether the surrender of the Third Reich in 1945 and the partition of Germany into occupation zones nullified the operation of the treaty, by stating: "We find no evidence that the political departments have considered the collapse and surrender of Germany as putting an end to such provisions of the treaty as survived the outbreak of the war or the obligation of either party in respect to them. The Allied Control Council has, indeed, assumed control of Germany's foreign affairs and treaty obligations - a policy and course of conduct by the political departments wholly consistent with the maintenance and enforcement, rather than the repudiation, of pre-existing treaties".

On October 29, 1954, a new Treaty of Friendship was signed between the U.S. and West German governments. Article XXVIII of the new treaty stated as follows: "The present Treaty shall replace and terminate provisions in force in Articles I through V, VII through XVI, and XXIX through XXXII, of the treaty of friendship, commerce and consular rights between the United States of America and Germany, signed Washington December 8, 1923".

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty</span> Express agreement between nations under international law

A treaty is a formal, legally binding written agreement between actors in international law. It is usually made by and between sovereign states, but can include international organizations, individuals, business entities, and other legal persons. A treaty may also be known as an international agreement, protocol, covenant, convention, pact, or exchange of letters, among other terms. However, only documents that are legally binding on the parties are considered treaties under international law. Treaties vary on the basis of obligations, precision, and delegation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of San Francisco</span> 1952 peace treaty with Japan

The Treaty of San Francisco, also called the Treaty of Peace with Japan, re-established peaceful relations between Japan and the Allied Powers on behalf of the United Nations by ending the legal state of war and providing for redress for hostile actions up to and including World War II. It was signed by 49 nations on 8 September 1951, in San Francisco, California, at the War Memorial Opera House. Italy and China were not invited, the latter due to disagreements on whether the Republic of China or the People's Republic of China represented the Chinese people. Korea was also not invited due to a similar disagreement on whether South Korea or North Korea represented the Korean people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Rapallo (1922)</span> Treaty re-establishing diplomatic and military relations between Russia and Germany

The Treaty of Rapallo was an agreement signed on 16 April 1922 between the German Republic and Soviet Russia under which both renounced all territorial and financial claims against each other and opened friendly diplomatic relations. The treaty was negotiated by Russian Foreign Minister Georgi Chicherin and German Foreign Minister Walther Rathenau. It was a major victory for Russia especially and also Germany, and a major disappointment to France and the United Kingdom. The term "spirit of Rapallo" was used for an improvement in friendly relations between Germany and Russia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Locarno Treaties</span> 1925 territorial settlements between the Allies of WWI and the new European states

The Locarno Treaties were seven agreements negotiated in Locarno, Switzerland, during 5 to 16 October 1925 and formally signed in London on 1 December, in which the First World War Western European Allied powers and the new states of Central and Eastern Europe sought to secure the post-war territorial settlement, in return for normalising relations with the defeated German Reich. It also stated that Germany would never go to war with the other countries. Locarno divided borders in Europe into two categories: western, which were guaranteed by the Locarno Treaties, and eastern borders of Germany with Poland, which were open for revision.

A war of aggression, sometimes also war of conquest, is a military conflict waged without the justification of self-defense, usually for territorial gain and subjugation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Taipei</span> 1952 peace Shot between Japan and the Republic of China

The Sino-Japanese Peace Treaty, formally the Treaty of Peace between the Republic of China and Japan and commonly known as the Treaty of Taipei, was a peace treaty between Japan and the Republic of China (ROC) signed in Taipei, Taiwan on 28 April 1952, and took effect on August 5 the same year, marking the formal end of the Second Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945).

The Prevention of Nuclear War Agreement was created to reduce the danger of nuclear war between the United States and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The agreement was signed at the Washington Summit, on June 22, 1973. The United States and the U.S.S.R. agreed to reduce the threat of a nuclear war and establish a policy to restrain hostility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States and the International Criminal Court</span> National relationship with the ICC

The United States is not a state party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, which founded the International Criminal Court (ICC) in 2002 as a permanent international criminal court to "bring to justice the perpetrators of the worst crimes known to humankind—war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide," when national courts are unable or unwilling to do so.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Indo-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship</span> 1950 treaty between Nepal and India

The 1950 India-Nepal Treaty of Peace and Friendship is a bilateral treaty signed by the Kingdom of Nepal and the Republic of India to establish a close strategic relationship between the two South Asian neighbours. The treaty was signed at Kathmandu on 31 July 1950 by the last Rana Prime Minister of Nepal Mohan Shumsher Jang Bahadur Rana and Indian ambassador to Nepal, Chadreshwar Narayan Singh and came into force the same day as per Article 9 of the Treaty. Rana rule in Nepal ended just 3 months after the treaty was signed. The treaty allows free movement of people and goods between the two nations and a close relationship and collaboration on matters of defense and foreign policy.

The Franco-Soviet Treaty of Mutual Assistance was a bilateral treaty between France and the Soviet Union with the aim of enveloping Nazi Germany in 1935 to reduce the threat from Central Europe. It was pursued by Maxim Litvinov, the Soviet foreign minister, and Louis Barthou, the French foreign minister, who was assassinated in October 1934, before negotiations had been finished.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Minority Treaties</span> Legal agreements of United Nations and League of Nations members

The Minority Treaties are treaties, League of Nations mandates, and unilateral declarations made by countries applying for membership in the League of Nations that conferred basic rights on all the inhabitants of the country without distinction of birth, nationality, language, race or religion. The country concerned had to acknowledge the clauses of the treaty as fundamental laws of state and as obligations of international concern placed under the guarantee of the League of Nations. Most of the treaties entered into force after the Paris Peace Conference.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Tianjin (1885)</span> 1885 unequal treaty which ended the Sino-French War

The Treaty of Tianjin, signed on June 9, 1885, officially ended the Sino-French War. The "unequal treaty", or colonial treaty, restated in greater detail the main provisions of the Tianjin Accord, signed between France and China on May 11, 1884. As Article 2 required China to recognize the French protectorate over Annam and Tonkin established by the Treaty of Hue in June 1884, implicitly forcing China to abandon its claims to suzerainty over Vietnam, the treaty formalized France's diplomatic victory in the Sino-French War.

An agreement concluded between the Soviet and the Norwegian governments in Christiania on 2 September 1921 to regulate their relations. It was ratified by the Soviet government on 19 September and by the Norwegian government on 1 October. The agreement went into effect on 1 October 1921 and was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on 19 December 1921.

The U.S.–German Peace Treaty was a peace treaty between the U.S. and the German governments. It was signed in Berlin on August 25, 1921 in the aftermath of World War I. The main reason for the conclusion of that treaty was the fact that the U.S. Senate did not consent to ratification of the multilateral peace treaty signed in Versailles, thus leading to a separate peace treaty. Ratifications were exchanged in Berlin on November 11, 1921, and the treaty became effective on the same day. The treaty was registered in League of Nations Treaty Series on August 12, 1922.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sino-British Treaty for the Relinquishment of Extra-Territorial Rights in China</span> 1943 treaty between China and the United Kingdom

The Sino-British Treaty for the Relinquishment of Extra-Territorial Rights in China, or the Sino-British New Equal Treaty, was a bilateral treaty concluded between the British and the Chinese governments in Chungking (Chongqing) on 11 January 1943. The formal name of the treaty was Treaty Between His Majesty in Respect of the United Kingdom and India and His Excellency the President of the National Government of the Republic of China for the Relinquishment of Extra-Territorial Rights in China and the Regulation of Related Matters.

The Bucareli Treaty, officially the Convención Especial de Reclamaciones, was an agreement signed in 1923 between México and United States. It settled losses by US companies during the Mexican Revolution. It also dealt with the illegality of potential expropriating American landholding and subsoils for the sake of Mexican public use as well as the ways of calculating compensation and forms of payment, given expropriation was well needed.

The Treaty of Amity and Commerce between His Majesty the Magnificent King of Siam and the United States of America, or Roberts Treaty of 1833, was the first treaty between the United States and an Asian nation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nepal–Britain Treaty of 1923</span> Treaty in which Britain recognized Nepal

The Nepal–Britain Treaty was first discussed in 1921 and the final treaty was signed on 21 December 1923 in Singha Durbar. The treaty was the first formal acknowledgement by the British that Nepal, as an independent nation, had the right to conduct its foreign policy in any way it saw fit and was considered to be “a great achievement of 25 years of Chandra Shumsher’s diplomacy.” The treaty was recorded in 1925 in the League of Nations.

The Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Rights between the United States and Iran was signed in Tehran on August 15, 1955, received the consent of the U.S. Senate on July 11, 1956 and entered into force on 16 June 1957. The treaty is registered by the United States to the United Nations on 20 December 1957. The official texts are in English and Persian. It is sealed by plenipotentiaries Selden Chapin (U.S.) and Mostafa Samiy (Iran). The Treaty has served as the jurisdictional basis for various international legal disputes between the United States and Iran, including the International Court of Justice (ICJ) cases Oil Platforms and Alleged Violations of the 1955 Treaty of Amity, Economic Relations and Consular Rights. In October 2018, the United States provided notice that it would be withdrawing from the Treaty following Iran's use of the Treaty as a basis to challenge the U.S. imposition of sanctions under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in the Alleged Violations case.

References

  1. ↑ League of Nations Treaty Series, vol. 52, pp. 134-170.
  2. ↑ Web page on U.S. -German relations
  3. ↑ Text in League of Nations Treaty Series, vol. 163, pp. 416-418.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.