Umbricia gens

Last updated

The gens Umbricia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Only a few members of this gens are mentioned by Roman writers, but they had achieved senatorial rank by the second century. [1] The most famous of the Umbricii are probably the haruspex Gaius Umbricius Melior, who served the emperors of the middle first century, and Aulus Umbricius Scaurus, a merchant of Pompeii whose fish sauces were widely distributed. Quintus Umbricius Proculus was a second-century governor of Hispania Citerior. Many other Umbricii are known from inscriptions.

Contents

Origin

The nomen Umbricius belongs to a class of gentilicia formed from cognomina ending in -ex and -icus. [2] The surname Umbricus refers to a native of Umbria, [3] and thus is cognate with the nomina of the gentes Umbria, Umbrena, and Umbrilia, indicating that their ancestors were probably Umbrians.

Praenomina

The main praenomina of the Umbricii were Aulus , Gaius , Lucius , and Quintus , all of which were common throughout Roman history. They occasionally used other common names, including Marcus , Sextus , and Publius .

Branches and cognomina

Although the greatest number of inscriptions of this gens come from the city of Rome, a substantial family of the Umbricii seems to have lived at Pompeii in Campania, where they engaged in the manufacture of fish sauces that were widely sold in Italy, Gaul, and north Africa, and were prominent in the civic life of the town. Although Pompeii was destroyed by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in AD 79, various inscriptions show that the Umbricii settled in other parts of Italy, including other towns of Campania, Latium, and Etruria.

Members

This list includes abbreviated praenomina. For an explanation of this practice, see filiation.

Undated Umbricii

Notes

  1. Both types of fish sauce; garum was made from selected portions of the fish, while liquamen was made from whole fish.
  2. Brine.
  3. It's unclear whether this Scaurus is the same person as the garum manufacturer, or his son, but in either case, there were at least two persons, father and son, by this name at Pompeii.
  4. February 24, by modern reckoning.

See also

Related Research Articles

The gens Gegania was an old patrician family at ancient Rome, which was prominent from the earliest period of the Republic to the middle of the fourth century BC. The first of this gens to obtain the consulship was Titus Geganius Macerinus in 492 BC. The gens fell into obscurity even before the Samnite Wars, and is not mentioned again by Roman historians until the final century of the Republic.

The gens Acutia was a minor plebeian family at Ancient Rome. Members of this gens are mentioned from the early Republic to imperial times. The first of the Acutii to achieve prominence was Marcus Acutius, tribune of the plebs in 401 BC.

The gens Alliena or Aliena was a minor plebeian family of the Roman Republic. The first member of the gens to achieve prominence was Lucius Alienus, plebeian aedile in 454 BC. However, the family then slipped into obscurity for several centuries, emerging once more in the first century BC.

The gens Racilia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are mentioned as early as the fifth century BC, but few of them achieved any prominence in the Roman state.

The gens Rasinia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a number are known from inscriptions. In imperial times a Gaius Rasinius Silo was governor of Noricum.

The gens Rusticelia, occasionally spelled Rusticellia, was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens are mentioned in ancient writers, but a number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Seccia, Secia, or Siccia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens occur in history, but a number are known from inscriptions. The best known members include Lucius Siccius Dentatus, who won martial fame in the fifth century BC, and Gaius Secius Campanus suffect consul under Domitian.

The gens Sellia or Selia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are mentioned in the time of Cicero, but none of them attained any of the higher offices of the Roman state.

The gens Seppia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens appear in history, but many are known from inscriptions.

The gens Septicia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens are mentioned in ancient writers, but a number are known from inscriptions. The most famous of the Septicii was Gaius Septicius Clarus, Prefect of the Praetorian Guard under the emperor Hadrian.

The gens Spuria was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens occur in ancient writers, but many are known from inscriptions. Although at least some were of equestrian rank, and a number of Spurii held public offices in the various municipia, the most illustrious person of this name may have been Lucius Spurius Maximus, a tribune of the Vigiles at Rome during the reign of Septimius Severus.

The gens Suettia or Suetia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are mentioned in the time of Cicero, but none of them achieved any of the higher offices of the Roman state.

The gens Tampia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Members of this gens are first mentioned in history during the time of Nero, but few achieved any distinction in the Roman state. The nomen Tampius is easily confused with that of Ampius. The most illustrious of the Tampii was Lucius Tampius Flavianus, who held the consulship twice during the latter half of the first century.

The gens Tatia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. This gens is perhaps best known from the legendary figure of Titus Tatius, a Sabine king who fought against Romulus, and who subsequently became joint ruler of Rome. None of the Tatii held any of the higher magistracies of the Roman Republic, but a number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tedia or Teidia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Only a few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but they had reached senatorial rank by the first century BC, and Sextus Tedius Valerius Catullus attained the consulship in AD 31. Other Tedii are known from inscriptions.

The gens Thorania, also written Torania, was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Only a few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but others are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tiburtia was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Hardly any members of this gens are mentioned in history, but a large number are known from inscriptions.

The gens Tillia, occasionally written Tilia, was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Few members of this gens are mentioned in history, but others are known from inscriptions.

The gens Turia, occasionally written Turria, was a minor plebeian family at ancient Rome. Several members of this gens are mentioned by Roman writers, although none of them ever obtained the consulship. Lucius Turius, who stood for the consulship in the late Republic, was praetor in 75 BC.

The gens Urvinia was an obscure plebeian family at ancient Rome. No members of this gens are mentioned by Roman writers, but several are known from inscriptions.

References

  1. 1 2 Torelli, Studies in the Romanization of Italy, p. 58.
  2. Chase, p. 126.
  3. Lewis and Short, A Latin Dictionary, s.v. Umbricus.
  4. CIL I, 2236, CIL I, 2245.
  5. CIL XIV, 3945.
  6. CIL XI, 3254.
  7. CIL VI, 38854.
  8. CIL XI, 2504.
  9. CIL IV, 2574a, b, CIL IV, 2587.
  10. CIL IV, 5671, CIL IV, 5685, CIL IV, 5689.
  11. CIL IV, 7110, CIL IV, 9418.
  12. CIL IV, 2573, CIL IV, 5661.
  13. CIL IV, 3340,104, CIL IV, 3340,113.
  14. CIL XI, 924.
  15. CIL VI, 38087.
  16. CIL IV, 3340,023, CIL IV, 3340,024.
  17. CIL IV, 3340,025.
  18. AE 1930, 52.
  19. Pliny, Historia Naturalis, i. 10. § 11.
  20. Tacitus, Historiae, i. 27.
  21. Plutarch, "The Life of Galba", 24.
  22. PIR, vol. III, p. 467 (V, No. 592).
  23. CIL VI, 37791.
  24. CIL VI, 710.
  25. 1 2 3 4 CIL VI, 29417.
  26. CIL X, 1024.
  27. CIL VI, 31123.
  28. CIL XI, 717.
  29. Juvenal, iii. 21 ff.
  30. PIR, vol. III, p. 467 (V, No. 591).
  31. 1 2 CIL VI, 29421.
  32. AE 2002, 357.
  33. CIL VI, 16684.
  34. CIL VI, 29416.
  35. 1 2 CIL VI, 2927.
  36. AE 1951, 181.
  37. 1 2 CIL X, 3142.
  38. 1 2 CIL XI, 2594.
  39. CIL II, 4128.
  40. PIR, vol. III, p. 467 (V, No. 593).
  41. AE 1920, 107.
  42. Harter-Uibopuu, Erwerb und Veräusserung von Grabstätten, pp. 248, 249 (note 12).
  43. AE 1938, 69.
  44. CIL VI, 29423, CIL VI, 36584.
  45. Digesta, i. tit. 6. § 2.
  46. PIR, vol. III, p. 467 (V, No. 594).
  47. CIL X, 3141.
  48. CIL VI, 23919.
  49. 1 2 AE 1991, 675.
  50. CIL VI, 13159, CIL VI, 13160.
  51. CIL XI, 5738.
  52. CIL VI, 1057.
  53. CIL III, 1102.
  54. CIL III, 14.
  55. CIL VI, 29419.
  56. CIL VIII, 7844.
  57. AE 2010, 204.
  58. CIL XI, 4329.
  59. CIL VI, 29848a.
  60. CIL XI, 6700,819q, r; CIL XI, 6695,096a, b.
  61. Grelle and Pani, Le Epigrafi Romane di Canosa, 131–134.
  62. CIL VIII, 22645,410, CIL XI, 6700,796a–l, n, CIL XI, 6700,798a–c, CIL XI, 6700,813, CIL XIII, 10009,306a1, CIL XIII, 10009,309.
  63. CAG, 12, p. 417; 17-2, pp. 148, 187; 31-2, p. 295; 59-2, pp. 177, 323; 81, p. 223.
  64. CIL IX, 5170.
  65. CIL XIV, 4509.
  66. CIL VI, 29418.
  67. CIL XI, 1617.
  68. CIL VI, 29414.
  69. 1 2 CIL VI, 29415.
  70. CIL VIII, 27269.
  71. CIL VIII, 19067.
  72. CIL XII, 4526.
  73. CIL XI, 7231.
  74. CIL VIII, 22645,409a-d, CIL VIII, 22645,415, CIL XI, 6700,791, CIL XI, 6700,792a–n, q.
  75. CAG, 31–1, p. 101; 47, p. 228; 82, p. 64.
  76. CIL VI, 29420.
  77. CIL VI, 29422.

Bibliography