41.18

Last updated

41.18, also known as Los Angeles Municipal Code, Section 41.18(d) (1963, amended 2021), is an ordinance in Los Angeles prohibiting by law that there will be no "sitting, lying, or sleeping, or ... storing, using, maintaining, or placing personal property in the public right-of-way." [1] Sec. 41.18(d) dictates the distance any person must be from places such as: utilizable driveways and loading docks; operational or utilizable buildings; any permitted event; bike lanes and bike paths; parks, schools, libraries, or otherwise designated as a "sensitive use" facility; freeway ramp, tunnel, bridge, pedestrian bridge, subway, wash, spreading ground, or active railway; or, anywhere near (1000 feet) of a facility opened after January 1, 2018, that provides shelter, safe sleeping, safe parking to houseless persons or that serves as a navigation center. [2]

Contents

History of the law

Historically, homelessness has been criminalized through the use of vagrancy statutes. This criminalization of vagrancy dates back to the 14th century enactment of the Statutes of Laborers. In 16th and 17th century Europe, "vagrants" were beaten and/or imprisoned with the intention of eliminating idleness and enforcing labor. [3]

Section 41.18 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) was authored by former Councilmember Paul H. Lamport and originally enacted in 1963 as an anti-loitering law used to police public space in Los Angeles. The previous law noted that it was illegal to obstruct the sidewalk, but made it impossible to convict people who are blocking a sidewalk. In 1962, 77 persons living on Fairfax Ave. and Oakwood Ave. in the Fairfax District of Los Angeles were arrested by authorities who cited the old code as the reason. The cases were dismissed because even though they were living on the sidewalk it was still possible for people to pass through the area. Lamport, working with the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce and the Merchantor's Association proposed a re-wording of the law to make it an effective law enforcement tool. It was passed unanimously by the Los Angeles City Council, which included Councilmembers Robert M. Wilkinson, Louis R. Nowell and Tom Bradley. Eventually, the Supreme Court's response was that it was unconstitutional to arrest people without offering means of visible support. As a result, if a person was arrested under LAMC Section 41.18 the amendments would remain in effect until the person arrested appealed to a higher court and won and then the entire municipal code section would become invalid. [4]

Role in judicial decisions

Jones v. The City of Los Angeles

In 2003, the ACLU of Southern California and the National Lawyers Guild filed a case on behalf of an unhoused man named Edward Jones, who was one of six unhoused individuals who had been cited by the LAPD for sleeping on the sidewalk. The appellants had been living in the Skid Row neighborhood of Los Angeles for as long as two to forty years. The descriptions of their lives revealed a broad spectrum of the causes of their homelessness. Most were disabled, had limited mobility and were unable to stay employed due to their own or their spouse's physical or mental disabilities. The appellants' various sources of support from Social Security, General Assistance, food stamps, and other programs were not enough to afford housing or pay for a hotel room every night. At the time the number of unhoused people in Skid Row exceeded the number of available shelter beds resulting in them not always being able to obtain a bed in a free shelter. In conclusion, the court reviewed the availability of housing in Los Angeles and found that there was insufficient space available in hotels, shelters, and most especially permanent housing, leaving more than 1,000 persons in Skid Row without shelter each night. The case further revealed that there were nearly 50,000 more unhoused people than available shelter beds in all of Los Angeles County. The court determined that in this circumstance where the number of unhoused people exceeded the number of available beds-enforcement of the ordinance would violate appellants' Eighth Amendment rights. Additionally, Jones and his wife were both unhoused and there were no shelters that permitted a childless couple to stay together. Their combined monthly general relief check was not sufficient to pay for a hotel room on Skid Row for the entire month. [5]

In 2006, Jones v. The City of Los Angeles came before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court upheld a ruling that 41.18(d) was a violation of the Eighth Amendment, which prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. The settlement of the case concluded that the city of Los Angeles agreed not to enforce 41.18(d) until they had provided 1,250 units of permanent public housing. [6] [7] The court affirmed that an individual may become homeless based on factors both within and beyond their immediate control, especially in consideration of the composition of the homeless as a group:  the mentally ill, people with a substance use disorder, victims of domestic violence, the unemployed, and the unemployable and to convict people who are homeless who do not otherwise have options for housing or support is unconstitutional. [4]

Despite the outcome, the conclusion from the Jones case still allows for additional challenges with anti-homeless laws. One challenge has been for petitioners with limited resources and support struggling to provide sufficient evidence that they had no choice other than to be on the streets, or i.e., that there were no beds available in shelters. Another implication of the Jones decision is forcing unhoused persons into shelters if they provide enough beds, thus making sleeping in public a crime and forcing them to sleep in places where they potentially have even less comfort and safety than they do on the streets. [3] The conclusion of this pre-pandemic case has had consequences on the current pandemic world, as those experiencing homelessness may elect to not stay in a shelter because of their high vulnerability to disease. As a result, individuals choosing to avoid the acute danger of COVID-19 in shelters are left unprotected by law. [8]

Enforcement

The implementation and enforcement of the law has been uneven because the original law did not set a standard for who is to be arrested and moved, it only mentions what actions are illegal. When looking for actual enforcement of Section 41.18(d), data shows police tend to target unhoused people in the city. [9] The law states that anyone who violates LAMC Section 41.18(d) shall be subject to the penalties set forth in LAMC Section 11.00, which states the violation as a misdemeanor, and an imprisonable offense that includes fines. [10]

Encampment sweeps

Signage for a 41.18 Special Enforcement Zone in Beverly Grove, Los Angeles 41.18 Special Enforcement Zone.jpg
Signage for a 41.18 Special Enforcement Zone in Beverly Grove, Los Angeles

A homeless encampment sweep (or "clean-up") is the forced displacement of homeless encampments on public property and the removal of both unhoused individuals and their property from that area. Tactics vary between cities, suburbs and rural areas as to how much notice encampments are given before a sweep and what the city does with property collected during a sweep. Courts have held that failing to give sufficient notice before a sweep, so that people can act to keep their property safe, or destroying property during a sweep violates the rights of unhoused individuals. [11] Federal judges have repeatedly issued court orders to stop the City of Los Angeles from seizing and destroying the property of unhoused people. [12]

City of Los Angeles departments such as LA Sanitation, the Los Angeles Police Department, and City housing agencies work together to facilitate encampment sweeps under the guise of "environmental and public health protections". During sweeps, sanitation and police departments seize unhoused individuals' belongings and force mobility. Unhoused individuals are swept from one place to the next without offers of housing or services, facing a continuous cycle of displacement, social isolation and banishment. [8]

Special Enforcement Zones

Special Enforcement Zones (SECZs) are council-designated special zones within their districts which step up enforcement of Section 41.18(d). The City Council votes on areas to become Special Enforcement Zones which states that persons and items placed in these zones will be removed by the city. [13] The zones are meant to apply to "sensitive use" sites, which includes everything from driveways, entrances, exits, fire hydrants, city-permitted activity, overpasses, streets, ADA access, public libraries, homeless shelters, parks and schools. [14] In 2021, Councilmember Joe Buscaino set a motion to ban encampments 500 feet from all public schools and libraries. [15] Special Enforcement Zones cover approximately 20% of the City of Los Angeles. [16]

Reception

Opponents

Services Not Sweeps

The Services Not Sweeps Coalition was a coalition of organizations and unhoused individuals in Los Angeles fighting for solutions that prioritize the public health concerns of unhoused residents. Services Not Sweeps was made up of over 35 community organizations demanding the Mayor of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles City Council put public health before politics and suspend the rollout of LAMC Section 41.18(d) in the current COVID-19 pandemic world. With evidence of a summary report of people experiencing homelessness who contracted COVID-19 in homeless shelters issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Services Not Sweeps argued that forcing people to leave their encampments and disperse into the community goes against all available public health guidance, increases transmission rates, and disconnects people from critical medical care, outreach, and support. [17] [18]

Supporters

Supporters of the law are individuals who do not want homeless people taking up space outside of their business or home. The Los Angeles City Council of 1963 was ultimately the main supporter of 41.18, in addition to the councilmembers since including those who amended this law on July 1, 2021, with a vote of 13-2. A second vote was required because it did not pass unanimously the first time around. The second vote also had 13 in favor and two against. Councilmembers Nithya Raman and Mike Bonin both voted against the ordinance. The amended Section 41.18(d) was co-authored by city council members Paul Krekorian and Mark Ridley-Thomas.[ citation needed ]

Effects

Unhoused residents who are affected by Section 41.18(d) and experience encampment sweeps often lose vital personal belongings including but not limited to shelter protecting from the elements, warm clothing, personal hygiene supplies, food and medicine, as well as the loss of community which often leads to physical hardship, mental health trauma and in many cases death.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in the United States</span>

In the United States, the number of homeless people on a given night in January 2022 was 582,462 according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Annual federal HUD reports contradict private state and local reports where homelessness is shown to have increased each year since 2014 across several major American cities, with 40 percent increases noted in 2017 and in 2019.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homeless shelter</span> Service agency that provides temporary residence for homeless people

Homeless shelters are a type of homeless service agency which provide temporary residence for homeless individuals and families. Shelters exist to provide residents with safety and protection from exposure to the weather while simultaneously reducing the environmental impact on the community. They are similar to, but distinguishable from, various types of emergency shelters, which are typically operated for specific circumstances and populations—fleeing natural disasters or abusive social circumstances. Extreme weather conditions create problems similar to disaster management scenarios, and are handled with warming centers, which typically operate for short durations during adverse weather.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homeless women in the United States</span>

Out of 10,000 female individuals 13 are homeless. Although studies reflect that there are many differences among women suffering homelessness and there is no universal experience, the average homeless woman is 35 years old, has children, is a member of a minority community, and has experienced homelessness more than once in their lifetime.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Skid Row, Los Angeles</span> Neighborhood in Downtown Los Angeles

Skid Row is a neighborhood in Downtown Los Angeles. The area is officially known as Central City East.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discrimination against homeless people</span>

Discrimination against homeless people is the act of treating unhoused people or people perceived to be unhoused unfavorably. As with most types of discrimination, it can manifest in numerous forms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-homelessness legislation</span> Laws regarding homelessness

Anti-homelessness legislation can take two forms: legislation that aims to help and re-house homeless people; and legislation that is intended to send homeless people to homeless shelters compulsorily, or to criminalize homelessness and begging.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta Park</span> Park complex in Portland, Oregon, U.S.

Delta Park is a public municipal park complex in north Portland in the U.S. state of Oregon. Delta Park is composed of two distinct sections referred to as East and West Delta Park. The Owens Sports Complex is a notable attraction of East Delta Park, bringing teams from across the West Coast to compete in an array of sports. For local Oregonians, homelessness and a past Proud Boys rally distinguish East Delta Park and the Owens Sports Complex from other parks in the Portland area.

In the United States, a sit-lie ordinance is a municipal ordinance which prohibits sitting or lying on the sidewalk or in other public spaces.

The Homeless Bill of Rights refers to legislation protecting the civil and human rights of homeless people. These laws affirm that homeless people have equal rights to medical care, free speech, free movement, voting, opportunities for employment, and privacy. Legislation of this type is currently being debated at the state level in the United States. Over 120 organizations in five different states have shown public support for a Homeless Bill of Rights and are working towards its implementation. A Homeless Bill of Rights has become law in Rhode Island, Connecticut and Illinois and is under consideration by several other U.S. states, including California, Delaware, Minnesota, Missouri, Oregon, Tennessee, and Vermont.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mitch O'Farrell</span> American politician

Mitch O'Farrell is an American politician, who served as a member of the Los Angeles City Council for the 13th district from 2013 to 2022, during which he spent eight days as President of the City Council during the 2022 Los Angeles City Council scandal. A member of the Democratic Party, O'Farrell was the first Native American elected to the body, and was one of its two openly gay members until the end of his second term in 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in the San Francisco Bay Area</span>

The San Francisco Bay Area comprises nine northern California counties and contains four of the ten most expensive counties in the United States. Strong economic growth has created hundreds of thousands of new jobs, but coupled with severe restrictions on building new housing units, it has resulted in an extreme housing shortage which has driven rents to extremely high levels. The Sacramento Bee notes that large cities like San Francisco and Los Angeles both attribute their recent increases in homeless people to the housing shortage, with the result that homelessness in California overall has increased by 15% from 2015 to 2017. In September 2019, the Council of Economic Advisers released a report in which they stated that deregulation of the housing markets would reduce homelessness in some of the most constrained markets by estimates of 54% in San Francisco, 40 percent in Los Angeles, and 38 percent in San Diego, because rents would fall by 55 percent, 41 percent, and 39 percent respectively. In San Francisco, a minimum wage worker would have to work approximately 4.7 full-time jobs to be able to spend less than 30% of their income on renting a two-bedroom apartment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in Florida</span>

According to the United States Interagency Council on Homelessness, as of January 2017, there are an estimated 32,190 homeless individuals in Florida. Of this high number, 2,846 are family households, 2,019 are unaccompanied young adults, 2,817 are veterans, and an estimated 5,615 are individuals experiencing chronic homelessness. According to a January 2020 count, this figure was 27,487 on any given day, a decrease from previous years. According to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, as of December 2022, the estimate for homeless individuals has dropped to 25,959, about 5% of the total U.S. population. This is in spite of fears that moratorium's on evictions ending could lead to an increase in the homeless population.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in the United States by state</span>

Homelessness in the United States has occurred to varying degrees across the country. The total number of homeless people in the United States fluctuates and constantly changes hence a comprehensive figure encompassing the entire nation is not issued since counts from independent shelter providers and statistics managed by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development vary greatly. Federal HUD counts hover annually at around 500,000 people. Point-in-time counts are also vague measures of homeless populations and are not a precise and definitive indicator for the total number of cases, which may differ in both directions up or down. The most recent figure for the year 2019 that was given was at 567,715 individuals across the country that have experienced homelessness at a point in time during this period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness in California</span>

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development estimated that more than 171,500 people were homeless in California in January 2022. This represents 30% of the homeless population of the United States even though California has slightly less than 12% of the country's total population, and is the highest per capita rate in the nation, with 0.44% of residents being homeless. More than two-thirds of homeless people in California are unsheltered, which is the highest percentage of any state in the United States. Half of the unsheltered homeless people in the United States live in California: about 115,500 people, which is nine times as many as the state with the second highest total. Even those who are sheltered are so insecurely, with 90% of homeless adults in California reporting that they spent at least one night unsheltered in the past six months.

In September 2021, an average of 47,916 people slept in New York City's homeless shelters each night. This included 18,236 single adults, 14,946 children, and 14,734 adults in families. The total number peaked in November 2018, with 63,636 people sleeping in homeless shelters. Since March 2020, the number of people sleeping in shelters has declined significantly, likely an effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. The city reported that in 2019, 3,600 individuals experienced unsheltered homelessness, sleeping in public spaces such as streets and public transit rather than shelters. The homeless population has surged in New York City 18% in 2023 from 2022, despite efforts from Mayor Adams.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nithya Raman</span> American politician and activist

Nithya V. Raman is an American urban planner, activist, and politician serving as the Los Angeles City Councilmember for the 4th District since 2020. Raman, a member of the Democratic Party and the Democratic Socialists of America, defeated incumbent Councilmember David Ryu in 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Minneapolis park encampments</span> Homeless encampments in city parks

The U.S. city of Minneapolis featured officially and unofficially designated camp sites in city parks for people experiencing homelessness that operated from June 10, 2020, to January 7, 2021. The emergence of encampments on public property in Minneapolis was the result of pervasive homelessness, mitigations measures related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Minnesota, local unrest after the murder of George Floyd, and local policies that permitted encampments. At its peak in the summer of 2020, there were thousands of people camping at dozens of park sites across the city. Many of the encampment residents came from outside of Minneapolis to live in the parks. By the end of the permit experiment, four people had died in the city's park encampments, including the city's first homicide victim of 2021, who was stabbed to death inside a tent at Minnehaha Park on January 3, 2021.

Mass and Cass, also known as Methadone Mile or Recovery Road, is a tent city in Boston, Massachusetts located at and around the intersection of Melnea Cass Boulevard and Massachusetts Avenue. It is located in the area of Newmarket, an industrial part of Boston that includes some of Dorchester, South Boston, Roxbury, Boston, and the South End.

The COVID-19 pandemic made homelessness in Toronto more visible, due to the rise of encampments in public parks. However, homelessness in Canada had been an issue of widespread concern long before the pandemic's arrival. A 2016 report found that at least 235,000 Canadians experience homelessness in a year, and 35,000 Canadians experience it on a given night. A Nanos survey found in 2020 that 72% of Canadians believed it was urgent to work toward ending homelessness in Canada. A 2020 report from the Wellesley Institute argues that there were disproportionately higher rates of evictions in Black neighborhoods, and that Black residents were among the worst hit by COVID-19. As part of its stay at home order in March 2020, the Ontario government instated a ban on evictions, however this was lifted with the emergency order in June 2020. The Ontario government however made evictions easier, according to some critics, due to its passage of Bill 184 which allowed landlords to bypass the Landlord and Tenant Board. One advocacy group deemed the cascading effects of Bill 184 'a bloodbath of evictions'. By December 2020, Toronto tenants were calling for a reinstatement of the moratorium on evictions. The crisis conditions of the pandemic lead to an increase in organizing against what many homelessness advocates deemed to be social murder of the city's unhoused. This ranged from legal lawsuits against the city's shelter system to calls for a city plan that would address the large numbers of unhoused people camping outside, to suits against encampment evictions, to large scale protests against the clearings of public parks. The Covid-19 encampments are best understood as emerging out of a longer history of urban informality in Toronto.

References

  1. ↑ "Section 41.18 of the Los Angeles Municipal Code" (PDF).
  2. ↑ "41.18 Amendment: A Wolf in Wolf's Clothing" . Retrieved 2022-05-13.
  3. 1 2 Daniels, Wes. Recurring Misfortune, Economic Hard Times and Lifestyle Choices: Judicial Images of Homeless Litigants and Implications for Legal Advocates.
  4. 1 2 "LA Poverty Department quote" . Retrieved 2022-05-13.
  5. ↑ "FindLaw's United States Ninth Circuit case and opinions". Findlaw. Retrieved 2022-05-17.
  6. ↑ "ACLU of Southern California Wins Historic Victory in Homeless Rights Case". American Civil Liberties Union. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
  7. ↑ "Jones v. State of Los Angeles | Case Brief for Law Students" . Retrieved 2022-05-12.
  8. 1 2 "Denver v. Burton, 28 Cal. 549 | Casetext Search + Citator". casetext.com. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
  9. ↑ "LAMC 41.18(d)". Michael Kohlhaas dot org. Retrieved 2022-05-13.
  10. ↑ "DailyJournal". www.dailyjournal.com. Retrieved 2022-05-13.
  11. ↑ "Outside the Law: The Legal War Against Unhoused People" (PDF).
  12. ↑ "L.A. can't seize homeless people's bulky items solely based on size, judge rules". Los Angeles Times. 2020-04-14. Retrieved 2022-07-08.
  13. ↑ "Eyes on the Street: Anti-Camping Rocks Block Ktown Sidewalk". Streetsblog Los Angeles. 2022-01-31. Retrieved 2023-04-30.
  14. ↑ "From products to people: The growing impact of supply chain interruptions during the coronavirus pandemic". ORMS Multimedia Group. 2020-03-18. Retrieved 2023-04-30.
  15. ↑ "LA Councilman Joe Buscaino seeks to ban homeless encampments near libraries". ABC7 Los Angeles. 2022-06-05. Retrieved 2023-04-30.
  16. ↑ "You are being redirected..." www.randomlengthsnews.com. Retrieved 2023-04-30.
  17. ↑ CDC (2020-02-11). "Community, Work, and School". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2022-05-12.
  18. ↑ "Summary Report of COVID-19 in People Experiencing Homelessness, 12/27/2021 to 01/02/2022" (PDF).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.