Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living

Last updated
Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living
Autopoiesis and Cognition, The Realization of the Living book cover.png
AuthorsHumberto Maturana and Francisco Varela
Original titleDe Maquinas y Seres Vivos (English: 'On Machines and Living Beings')
CountryChile
LanguageSpanish (original), English (translated)
SeriesBoston Studies in the Philosophy of Science (Volume 42)
SubjectCybernetics, systems theory, philosophy of biology
GenreNon-fiction
Publisher- Editorial Universitaria S.A. (1972)
  - D. Reidel Publishing Company (1980)
- Springer (1991)
Publication date
- 1972 (Chile)
  - 1980 (Holland)
- 1991 (Springer)

Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living is a cybernetic work in systems theory and the philosophy of biology by Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela. It was first published under the title De Maquinas y Seres Vivos (English: 'On Machines and Living Beings') in 1972 in Chile by Editorial Universitaria S.A., with a second edition published in 1980 by the D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, Holland, and a third edition published in 1991 by Springer. [1] This work defines and explores the concept of autopoiesis, or 'self-creation' in biological systems in an effort to address cognition and autonomy in living systems. [2] Autopoiesis was a core text for the field of second-order cybernetics, which often dealt with themes of self-reference and feedback loops. [3] The book is the 42nd volume in the series Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. [1] [4]

Contents

Reception

Autopoiesis and Cognition was most widely read as a work of systems theory. Reviews of the work praise it as an effort by scientists to bring their science to bear while crafting a phenomenology of biology, and addressing such important questions as the basis of life and cognition. However, reviewers also point out inconsistencies in the formal argument that Maturana and Varela are attempting to make. Reviewer M.G. writes in The Review of Metaphysics (v. 35, 1981),

It seems to me that the authors' claim to be able to say what is cognition by means of a biological cognition collapses on itself. The notion of autopoiesis defines a phenomenological domain which then excludes all descriptions irrelevant to the autopoietic unity. This is a patent circularity. [4]

The concepts introduced by the work were quite divisive, and a debate over their validity has continued since their introduction, in fields such as biology, sociology, organizational management, and systems theory. [5] [6]

Influence

Sociology

Sociologist and social systems theorist Niklas Luhmann adapted the ideas from Autopoiesis to describe social systems, as did cyberneticist Stafford Beer. [1] [7]

Biology

The influence of Autopoiesis in mainstream biology was limited. Autopoiesis is not commonly used as the criterion for life. [5] However, its basic principles are seen as features of the functions of biological organisms. Sir Paul Nurse, for example states 'living entities ... construct their own metabolism, and use it to maintain themselves, grow, and reproduce'. [8]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Niklas Luhmann</span> German sociologist (1927–1998)

Niklas Luhmann was a German sociologist, philosopher of social science, and a prominent thinker in systems theory.

Systems theory is the transdisciplinary study of systems, i.e. cohesive groups of interrelated, interdependent components that can be natural or artificial. Every system has causal boundaries, is influenced by its context, defined by its structure, function and role, and expressed through its relations with other systems. A system is "more than the sum of its parts" by expressing synergy or emergent behavior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Francisco Varela</span> Chilean scientist and philosopher

Francisco Javier Varela García was a Chilean biologist, philosopher, cybernetician, and neuroscientist who, together with his mentor Humberto Maturana, is best known for introducing the concept of autopoiesis to biology, and for co-founding the Mind and Life Institute to promote dialog between science and Buddhism.

An autocatalytic set is a collection of entities, each of which can be created catalytically by other entities within the set, such that as a whole, the set is able to catalyze its own production. In this way the set as a whole is said to be autocatalytic. Autocatalytic sets were originally and most concretely defined in terms of molecular entities, but have more recently been metaphorically extended to the study of systems in sociology, ecology, and economics.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Autopoiesis</span> Systems concept which entails automatic reproduction and maintenance

The term autopoiesis refers to a system capable of producing and maintaining itself by creating its own parts. The term was introduced in the 1972 publication Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living by Chilean biologists Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela to define the self-maintaining chemistry of living cells.

Robert Rosen was an American theoretical biologist and Professor of Biophysics at Dalhousie University.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Self-organization</span> Process of creating order by local interactions

Self-organization, also called spontaneous order in the social sciences, is a process where some form of overall order arises from local interactions between parts of an initially disordered system. The process can be spontaneous when sufficient energy is available, not needing control by any external agent. It is often triggered by seemingly random fluctuations, amplified by positive feedback. The resulting organization is wholly decentralized, distributed over all the components of the system. As such, the organization is typically robust and able to survive or self-repair substantial perturbation. Chaos theory discusses self-organization in terms of islands of predictability in a sea of chaotic unpredictability.

The philosophy of biology is a subfield of philosophy of science, which deals with epistemological, metaphysical, and ethical issues in the biological and biomedical sciences. Although philosophers of science and philosophers generally have long been interested in biology, philosophy of biology only emerged as an independent field of philosophy in the 1960s and 1970s, associated with the research of David Hull. Philosophers of science then began paying increasing attention to biology, from the rise of Neodarwinism in the 1930s and 1940s to the discovery of the structure of DNA in 1953 to more recent advances in genetic engineering. Other key ideas include the reduction of all life processes to biochemical reactions, and the incorporation of psychology into a broader neuroscience.

Second-order cybernetics, also known as the cybernetics of cybernetics, is the recursive application of cybernetics to itself and the reflexive practice of cybernetics according to such a critique. It is cybernetics where "the role of the observer is appreciated and acknowledged rather than disguised, as had become traditional in western science". Second-order cybernetics was developed between the late 1960s and mid 1970s by Heinz von Foerster and others, with key inspiration coming from Margaret Mead. Foerster referred to it as "the control of control and the communication of communication" and differentiated first order cybernetics as "the cybernetics of observed systems" and second-order cybernetics as "the cybernetics of observing systems".

Enactivism is a position in cognitive science that argues that cognition arises through a dynamic interaction between an acting organism and its environment. It claims that the environment of an organism is brought about, or enacted, by the active exercise of that organism's sensorimotor processes. "The key point, then, is that the species brings forth and specifies its own domain of problems ...this domain does not exist "out there" in an environment that acts as a landing pad for organisms that somehow drop or parachute into the world. Instead, living beings and their environments stand in relation to each other through mutual specification or codetermination" (p. 198). "Organisms do not passively receive information from their environments, which they then translate into internal representations. Natural cognitive systems...participate in the generation of meaning ...engaging in transformational and not merely informational interactions: they enact a world." These authors suggest that the increasing emphasis upon enactive terminology presages a new era in thinking about cognitive science. How the actions involved in enactivism relate to age-old questions about free will remains a topic of active debate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Humberto Maturana</span> Chilean biologist and philosopher (1928–2021)

Humberto Maturana Romesín was a Chilean biologist and philosopher. Many consider him a member of a group of second-order cybernetics theoreticians such as Heinz von Foerster, Gordon Pask, Herbert Brün and Ernst von Glasersfeld, but in fact he was a biologist, scientist.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Management cybernetics</span> Application of cybernetics to management and organizations

Management cybernetics is concerned with the application of cybernetics to management and organizations. "Management cybernetics" was first introduced by Stafford Beer in the late 1950s and introduces the various mechanisms of self-regulation applied by and to organizational settings, as seen through a cybernetics perspective. Beer developed the theory through a combination of practical applications and a series of influential books. The practical applications involved steel production, publishing and operations research in a large variety of different industries. Some consider that the full flowering of management cybernetics is represented in Beer's books. However, learning continues.

In The Tree of Knowledge (1987:47), Humberto Maturana and Francisco Varela set out a way of describing the nature of living things: “… [An] organization denotes those relations that must exist among components of a system for it to be a member of a specific class. Structure denotes the components and relations that actually constitute a particular unity [or thing]…” While Maturana and Varela (1987:28) do not pursue a specific discussion about process, they set out to understand the role of cognition as “… the universal nature of doing”. Maturana and Varela are seeking to understand what they term autopoiesis, how living things self–produce. Maturana and Varela (1987:47) claim: “… by realizing what characterizes living beings in their autopoietic organization, we can unify a whole lot of empirical data about their biochemistry and cellular functioning”.

Living systems are life forms treated as a system. They are said to be open self-organizing and said to interact with their environment. These systems are maintained by flows of information, energy and matter. Multiple theories of living systems have been proposed. Such theories attempt to map general principles for how all living systems work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cybernetics</span> Transdisciplinary field concerned with regulatory and purposive systems

Cybernetics is a field of systems theory that studies circular causal systems whose outputs are also inputs, such as feedback systems. It is concerned with the general principles of circular causal processes, including in ecological, technological, biological, cognitive and social systems and also in the context of practical activities such as designing, learning, and managing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chemoton</span> Abstract model for the fundamental unit of life

The term chemoton refers to an abstract model for the fundamental unit of life introduced by Hungarian theoretical biologist Tibor Gánti. Gánti conceived the basic idea in 1952 and formulated the concept in 1971 in his book The Principles of Life. He suggested that the chemoton was the original ancestor of all organisms.

Ezequiel A Di Paolo is a full-time Research Professor at Ikerbasque, the Basque Foundation for Science. He also has affiliations with the Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics at the University of Sussex. His field of research covers enactivism and embodiment in cognitive science.

Cognitive biology is an emerging science that regards natural cognition as a biological function. It is based on the theoretical assumption that every organism—whether a single cell or multicellular—is continually engaged in systematic acts of cognition coupled with intentional behaviors, i.e., a sensory-motor coupling. That is to say, if an organism can sense stimuli in its environment and respond accordingly, it is cognitive. Any explanation of how natural cognition may manifest in an organism is constrained by the biological conditions in which its genes survive from one generation to the next. And since by Darwinian theory the species of every organism is evolving from a common root, three further elements of cognitive biology are required: (i) the study of cognition in one species of organism is useful, through contrast and comparison, to the study of another species' cognitive abilities; (ii) it is useful to proceed from organisms with simpler to those with more complex cognitive systems, and (iii) the greater the number and variety of species studied in this regard, the more we understand the nature of cognition.

Viable system theory (VST) concerns cybernetic processes in relation to the development/evolution of dynamical systems: it can be used to explain living systems, which are considered to be complex and adaptive, can learn, and are capable of maintaining an autonomous existence, at least within the confines of their constraints. These attributes involve the maintenance of internal stability through adaptation to changing environments. One can distinguish between two strands such theory: formal systems and principally non-formal system. Formal viable system theory is normally referred to as viability theory, and provides a mathematical approach to explore the dynamics of complex systems set within the context of control theory. In contrast, principally non-formal viable system theory is concerned with descriptive approaches to the study of viability through the processes of control and communication, though these theories may have mathematical descriptions associated with them.

Autonomous agency theory (AAT) is a viable system theory (VST) which models autonomous social complex adaptive systems. It can be used to model the relationship between an agency and its environment(s), and these may include other interactive agencies. The nature of that interaction is determined by both the agency's external and internal attributes and constraints. Internal attributes may include immanent dynamic "self" processes that drive agency change.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Maturana, H. R.; Varela, F. J. (1991-08-31). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN   978-90-277-1016-1.
  2. Mingers, John (1989). "An introduction to autopoiesis?Implications and applications". Systems Practice. 2 (2): 159–180. doi:10.1007/BF01059497. ISSN   0894-9859. S2CID   145531718.
  3. Hayles, N. Katherine (1999). How We Became Posthuman. UChicago Press. pp. 131–159.
  4. 1 2 G., M. (1981). "Review of Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living". The Review of Metaphysics. 35 (2): 399–402. ISSN   0034-6632. JSTOR   20127678.
  5. 1 2 Razeto-Barry, Pablo (October 2012). "Autopoiesis 40 Years Later. A Review and A Reformulation". Origins of Life. 42 (6): 543–567. Bibcode:2012OLEB...42..543R. doi:10.1007/s11084-012-9297-y. PMID   23054553. S2CID   8267553 via Research Gate.
  6. Ahouse, Jeremy (May 1998). "The web of life: A new understanding of living systems by Fritjof Capra". Complexity. 3 (5): 50–52. Bibcode:1998Cmplx...3e..50A. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0526(199805/06)3:5<50::AID-CPLX9>3.0.CO;2-M via ResearchGate.
  7. Hernes, Tor; Bakken, Tore (2016-06-30). "Implications of Self-Reference: Niklas Luhmann's Autopoiesis and Organization Theory". Organization Studies. 24 (9): 1511–1535. doi:10.1177/0170840603249007. S2CID   143537257.
  8. Nurse, Sir Paul (2020). What is life?. David Fickling books. p. 191. ISBN   978-1-78845-140-6.