Border disputes between New York and Connecticut

Last updated
Border disputes between New York and Connecticut
Ctcolony.png
Map showing the Connecticut, New Haven, and Saybrook colonies and the CT–NY dispute
Date1638-1731
Location
Connecticut–New York border, Long Island Sound
Result Both sides claim victory
Belligerents
Flag of Connecticut.svg  Connecticut Flag of New York.svg  New York
Commanders and leaders
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Haynes (1638-1640)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Edward Hopkins (1640-1641)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Haynes (1641-1642)
Flag of Connecticut.svg George Wyllys (1642-1643)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Haynes (1643-1644)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Edward Hopkins (1644-1645)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Haynes (1645-1646)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Edward Hopkins (1646-1647)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Haynes (1647-1648)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Edward Hopkins (1649-1650)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Haynes (1650-1651)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Edward Hopkins (1651-1652)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Haynes (1652-1653)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Edward Hopkins (1653-1954)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Haynes (1654)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Edward Hopkins (1654-1655)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Thomas Welles (1655-1656)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Webster (1656-1657)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Winthrop (1657–1658)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Thomas Welles (1658-1659)
Flag of Connecticut.svg John Winthrop (1659-1676)
Flag of Connecticut.svg William Leete (1676-1783)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Robert Treat (1683-1687)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Edmund Andros (1687-1689)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Robert Treat (1689-1698)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Fitz-John Winthrop (1698-1707)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Gurdon Saltonstall (1708-1724)
Flag of Connecticut.svg Joseph Talcott (1724-1731)
Flag of New York.svg Willem Kieft (1638-1647)
Flag of New York.svg Peter Stuyvesant (1647-1664)
Flag of New York.svg Richard Nicolls (1664-1668)
Flag of New York.svg Francis Lovelace (1668-1672)
Flag of New York.svg Anthony Colve (1673-1674)
Flag of New York.svg Edmund Andros (1674-1681)
Flag of New York.svg Anthony Brockholls (1681-1683)
Flag of New York.svg Thomas Dongan (1683-1688)
Flag of New York.svg Francis Nicholson (1688-1691)
Flag of New York.svg Jacob Leisler (1681-1691)
Flag of New York.svg Henry Sloughter (1691)
Flag of New York.svg Richard Ingoldesby (1691-1692)
Flag of New York.svg Benjamin Fletcher (1692-1697)
Flag of New York.svg Richard Coote (1698-1701)
Flag of New York.svg John Nanfan (1701-1702)
Flag of New York.svg Edward Hyde (1702-1708)
Flag of New York.svg John Lovelace (1708-1709)
Flag of New York.svg Pieter Schuyler (1708-1709)
Flag of New York.svg Richard Ingoldesby (1709-1710)
Flag of New York.svg Gerardus Beekman (1710)
Flag of New York.svg Robert Hunter (1710–1719)
Flag of New York.svg Pieter Schuyler (1719-1720)
Flag of New York.svg William Burnet (1720-1728)
Flag of New York.svg John Montgomerie (1728-1731)
Flag of New York.svg Rip Van Dam (1731)
Strength

Connecticut National Guard

New York National Guard

Casualties and losses
None None

During the American colonial era, the colonies of New York and Connecticut often disputed the precise location of their shared border, leading to a border dispute that eventually gave the colonies their modern shapes. Though the dispute was officially resolved in 1731, effects of the boundary conflict persisted until well after both colonies gained statehood as part of the United States following the American Revolution.

Contents

Background

The dispute originated largely as an extension of a wider ongoing conflict between the colonial ambitions of benefactors of the Dutch Republic and the Kingdom of England. Much of the Dutch jurisprudence was based on the writings of the legal scholar Hugo Grotius, who emphasized claiming the land and interaction with the natives. The English did not generally accept Grotius' theories, in particular his Mare Liberum . When Henry Hudson had first explored the area in 1609, he was employed by the Dutch, so the Netherlands could base its claim on both first discovery and status as financial backer. In addition, the Dutch felt “that territorial possession depended on recognition of the rights of indigenous people in regard to their territory as well as on a Dutch military presence to defend the claim from European incursion.” [1] While the majority of the Dutch population of New Netherland clustered around the Hudson River and western Long Island, the Dutch still maintained forts and trading posts along the Connecticut River (e.g., Fort Hoop, in modern-day Hartford) and went on frequent expeditions to exploit the natural resources of the area (e.g., beaver hunting).

By contrast, the exploding population of the neighboring New England Colonies placed ever more farms and settlements across Connecticut and Long Island Sound. Connecticut Colony also based its claims on conquest. Following the end of the Pequot War in 1638, Connecticut had signed a treaty with the Massachusetts Bay Colony and the Mohegan and Narragansett tribes ceding all of the Pequot lands to Connecticut. The English also rejected the claim that Hudson's discovery secured the area for the Dutch: Hudson was an Englishman and had not been hired to explore the area, but had rather discovered it by accident.

Another English objection to Dutch control was based in dealings with the natives. The English believed the Dutch had endangered the "adjoining Countries most wickedly, feloniously, and traitorously, contrary to the Marine and Admirall Laws of all Christians, [by selling] wholesale guns, powder, shot and ammunition to the Indians, instructing them in the use of our fights and arms." [2] The Dutch claim to the land was further weakened when Peter Stuyvesant justified trading guns by citing pressure from the natives.

Treaty of 1650 between New Netherlands and Connecticut

Nova Belgica et Anglia Nova, displaying Dutch claims prior to 1650, 1635 Blaeu - Nova Belgica et Anglia Nova.png
Nova Belgica et Anglia Nova, displaying Dutch claims prior to 1650, 1635
1685 reprint of 1650 map of New Netherland, which is not a completely correct representation of the situation at the time. The border with New England had been adjusted to 50 miles west of the Fresh River, while the Lange Eylandt towns west of Oyster Bay were under Dutch jurisdiction. Map-Novi Belgii Novaeque Angliae (Amsterdam, 1685).jpg
1685 reprint of 1650 map of New Netherland, which is not a completely correct representation of the situation at the time. The border with New England had been adjusted to 50 miles west of the Fresh River, while the Lange Eylandt towns west of Oyster Bay were under Dutch jurisdiction.

In 1650, the Treaty of Hartford sought to set the border between New Netherlands and the colonies of Connecticut. The main land was split by a line 50 miles from the Connecticut River and Long Island was divided into an East (Connecticut) and West (New Netherland) at Oyster Bay. However, the treaty was never ratified back in England, which left the border unresolved when the Province of New York was created by a sea-to-sea grant in 1664, just two years after Connecticut had been issued a sea-to-sea charter in 1662.

The colonies of New York and Connecticut

Governor Nicolls and the 1664 agreement

The settlers from Connecticut and New York jostled over their respective claims. Long Islanders who had arrived from New England were very resistant to becoming New Yorkers. Local government under the Duke's charter gave no guarantee of assembly or “other privileges to which [New Englanders] had become accustomed.” [3]

In 1664, Charles II of England sent royal commissioners, led by Gov. Nicolls, in part to “end unneighbourly and unbrotherly contentions” [4] about the borders. The commissioners met with John Winthrop and Connecticut commissioners in November 1664.

As part of the agreement, announced in December 1664, the main land was divided “by the consent” of the commissioners with a north-northwest line at the mouth of the Mamaroneck River. Long Island, which was explicitly mentioned only in the grant to the Duke of York, was entirely given to New York. Though nominally an agreement, the “language of the agreement, however, gave it the character of a declaration or order to which Connecticut submitted as a subordinate.” [5]

The new line was west of the 1650 agreement, but it kept Westchester for NY. The line also cut off the Hudson around West Point, making Albany a part of Connecticut. Because few Europeans lived along the Hudson, it's unclear whether the line's intersection with it was known by the commissioners at the time.

In 1665, Commissioner George Cartwright reported, “The Bounds betwixt the Dukes province and Connecticut were mistaken by wrong Information, for it was not intended they should come nearer to Hudsons river then 20 miles, Yett the line was sett doune by the Commissioners to goe from such a Point Nor-nor-west whereas it ought to goes just North, otherwise the line will go into Hudsons river.” [7] In 1675, a New York review of the boundary claimed there was a verbal agreement that the line should be at all times 20 miles from the Hudson; and in 1683, Gov. Dongan heard witnesses testify that the Connecticut commissioners had assured Gov. Nicolls that “the river Mamranet was twenty miles every where from Hudson's River.” [9]

However, the agreement explicitly required royal approval, and since it concerned the grant to the Duke of York it required his approval as well. Neither approval was ever given.

Governor Lovelace and the return of New Amsterdam

Upon replacing Gov. Nicolls, Gov. Lovelace did not actively press the Duke of York's claims under his grant. The government of New York was less stable than that of Connecticut. It was economically weaker and had to unite a much more heterogeneous population. [10]

For a short period in 1673, New York reverted to New Amsterdam under Dutch control. The Dutch had by this time ratified the 1650 agreement. This would mark a significant loss to Connecticut, which pressed for adherence to the 1664 agreement and the ouster of the Dutch.

Governor Andros and New York's 1674 patent

Following the Treaty of Westminster, New York was once again under English control. Gov. Andros returned to New York in 1674 with a new patent, again claiming all lands up to the Connecticut River. Gov. Andros showed a markedly aggressive tack in his negotiations with Connecticut. In May 1675, Andros sent a letter asking for land west of the Connecticut River under the Duke's new patent. When Gov. Winthrop objected, Andros sent a representative in June to demand Connecticut's submission, threatening to send soldiers against any rebellion.

During this time of high tensions between the colonies, King Philip's War broke out in 1675. Andros attempted to use this to consolidate lands under the Duke's patent. At the start of the war, Andros sent troops to Fort Saybrook, nominally to defend. However, Winthrop's troops arrived first, and held the fort themselves. Andros requested that Winthrop temporarily relinquish Connecticut's claim to the area in order to strengthen the united defense. [11]

Governor Dongan and the 1683 agreement

In the 1680s, the Duke of York's influence in England grew stronger, and Gov. Dongan was encouraged to seek a speedy resolution to the border dispute after his arrival in 1683. John Pell, a Westchester justice, granted a warrant requiring the constables of Rye, Greenwich, and Stamford to appear at a NY Court of Assizes in Oct 1683. Gov. Dongan told the court that Connecticut had violated the 1664 agreement and warned “If you do not submitt to let us have all the land within twenty miles of Hudson's River, I must claime as far as the Duke's Pattent goes; which is to the River Connecticut. There is land enough for us all, and I love not to do my neighbors ill offices.” [12] The border agreed upon in 1683 is the modern border; giving Rye to New York but allowing Connecticut to retain Greenwich and Stamford. “The boundary would begin at the northwestern corner of Greenwich, proceed along a line eight miles north of and parallel to the Long Island Sound, then turn due north, extending to Massachusett's southern line.” [13] In respect of the 1664 oral agreement, because Greenwich and Stamford were less than 20 miles from the Hudson the line was more than 20 miles away in the north, granting New York “equivalent lands” in largely unpopulated areas. However, the 1683 agreement was never ratified back in England.

As the Dominion of New England became a reality and quo warranto proceedings were begun against the Connecticut charter in 1686, Gov. Dongan sought to have Connecticut subsumed by New York instead. Despite repeated attempts and conversations with Connecticut leaders, Dongan was informed by the General Court of England that it would be impossible and Connecticut would become part of the Dominion.

Governor Fletcher, Governor Bellomont, and the 1700 Order in Council

Following the 1688 Revolution, New York representatives in England continued to press for the annexation of Connecticut and the surrounding New England colonies, emphasizing New York's status as a royal rather than proprietary colony. Locally, private parties continued to dispute claims. In 1692, landowners in Rye and Bedford (New York, per the 1683 agreement) went to Connecticut General Court to seek protection. A month later, in November, some of these men were made to appear in New York courts and “acknowledge their fault in making their addresses to the Colony of Connecticut to be taken into that pretended Government.” [15]

In 1693, Gov. Fletcher commanded a Connecticut militia in Hartford as part of an intercolonial defense force called for in the royal commission. Fletcher, by his own admission, was bumptious and bellicose; Fitz-John Winthrop was later able to use this event to remove Fletcher from office in 1697. Before being replaced by Gov. Bellomont, Fletcher referred the dispute to Whitehall.

Gov. Bellomont and Gov. Winthrop pressed their respective cases. Winthrop argued that the 1683 agreement was invalid because it had never been ratified in England. But the March 1700 Order in Council sided with New York and the 1683 agreement; the dispute had finally been settled by order of the king.

Settling of the boundary

A 1799 map of Connecticut which shows the Oblong. From Low's Encyclopaedia. LowsCTmap.jpeg
A 1799 map of Connecticut which shows the Oblong. From Low's Encyclopaedia.

The governments of New York and Connecticut were not quick to effectuate the 1700 Order in Council. Between 1700 and 1717, neither attempted to actually survey and settle the border, leaving the issue to individual landowners. During this time, New York issued patents extending well beyond the boundary, and some New York patent holders even controlled land as far as the Housatonic River.

Beginning in 1717, Connecticut began to attempt to survey the line; New York had more trouble securing the appropriate funds because New York's royal patent made new land less profitable to individual citizens. In 1725, in order to effectuate the Order in Council, New York and Connecticut reached a working boundary agreement. The agreement created the Wilton and Ridgefield Angles to better follow the Hudson and to keep as much of Ridgefield in Connecticut as possible, as well as settled on the "equivalent land" that New York would receive in exchange for the Connecticut panhandle (i.e., the Oblong). The final survey was made and the Oblong was formally signed over by Connecticut in May 1731, ending the territorial dispute between Connecticut and New York.

Disputes by and between individual landowners, however, continued. For example, the Philipse family owned all of what is now Putnam County, New York, but did not enforce their ownership of the land within the Oblong, allowing hundreds of squatters to move in, mostly from Connecticut. These settlers were allowed to stay for decades, and a small village even sprung up on the Philipse land (now the hamlet of Patterson, New York). The issue was not resolved until the Philipse's land was confiscated after the Revolution, and the settlers were finally given deeds.

See also

Notes

  1. Klein, Sabine (Spring 2011). "They Have Invaded the Whole River". Early American Studies. 9 (2).
  2. Plantagenet, Beauchamp. 'A Description of the Province of New Albion' Archived March 28, 2005, at the Wayback Machine . 1648.
  3. Schwarz, Philip (1979). The Jarring Interests. Albany: State University of New York Press. ISBN   9780873953771.
  4. Brodhead, John R. (1853). Documents Relative to the Colonial History of NY. Vol. III. p. 64. Retrieved 2011-11-08.
  5. Schwarz 1979 , p. 8
  6. Schwarz 1979, p. 9
  7. George Cartwright's Report, 14 Dec. 1665. (as cited in [6] ). Calendared in W. Noel Sainsbury, ed. (1880). "America and West Indies: December 1665". Calendar of State Papers Colonial, America and West Indies, Volume 5: 1661-1668. Institute of Historical Research. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
  8. Schwarz 1979, p. 11
  9. New York Colonial Manuscripts, XXV, 54a (as cited in [8] )
  10. Schwarz 1979 , p. 23
  11. Schwarz 1979 , p. 26
  12. Connecticut (November 5, 1983). "Letter from Governor Dongan to Governor Treat". Public Records of the Colony of Connecticut. III: 330. Retrieved 2011-11-08.
  13. Schwarz 1979 , p. 33
  14. Schwarz 1979, p. 41
  15. New York Council, Ms. Mins. 3 November 1692. (as cited in [14] )

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edmund Andros</span> Colonial administrator in British America (1637–1714)

Sir Edmund Andros was an English colonial administrator in British America. He was the governor of the Dominion of New England during most of its three-year existence. At other times, Andros served as governor of the provinces of New York, East and West Jersey, Virginia, and Maryland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Middle Colonies</span> Subset of British American Thirteen Colonies

The Middle Colonies were a subset of the Thirteen Colonies in British America, located between the New England Colonies and the Southern Colonies. Along with the Chesapeake Colonies, this area now roughly makes up the Mid-Atlantic states.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Theophilus Eaton</span> British merchant and politician c. 1590–1658

Theophilus Eaton was a wealthy New England Puritan merchant, diplomat and financier, who took part in organizing and financing the Great Puritan Migration to America. He was a founder of Massachusetts Bay Colony, and a founder and eventual governor of New Haven Colony. He also cofounded the town of Greenwich in Connecticut and Eaton's Neck in New York.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Dongan, 2nd Earl of Limerick</span> Irish politician and military official

Thomas Dongan, 2nd Earl of Limerick, was a member of the Irish Parliament, Royalist military officer during the English Civil War, and Governor of the Province of New York. He is noted for having called the first representative legislature in New York, and for granting the province's Charter of Liberties. His negotiations and subsequent alliance with the Iroquois Indian Confederacy brought a lasting security from the French and their hostile Indian allies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Province of New York</span> British colony in North America (1664–1776)

The Province of New York (1664–1776) was a British proprietary colony and later royal colony on the northeast coast of North America. Together with 12 other colonies, the Province of New York achieved independence following the American Revolutionary War, becoming a part of the newly-formed United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Province of New Jersey</span> British colony in North America (1664–1673, 1702–1776)

The Province of New Jersey was one of the Middle Colonies of Colonial America and became the U.S. state of New Jersey in 1776. The province had originally been settled by Europeans as part of New Netherland but came under English rule after the surrender of Fort Amsterdam in 1664, becoming a proprietary colony. The English renamed the province after the island of Jersey in the English Channel. The Dutch Republic reasserted control for a brief period in 1673–1674. After that it consisted of two political divisions, East Jersey and West Jersey, until they were united as a royal colony in 1702. The original boundaries of the province were slightly larger than the current state, extending into a part of the present state of New York, until the border was finalized in 1773.

John Haynes, also sometimes spelled Haines, was a colonial magistrate and one of the founders of the Connecticut Colony. He served one term as governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony and was the first governor of Connecticut, ultimately serving eight separate terms. Although Colonial Connecticut prohibited Governors from serving consecutive terms at the time, "John Haynes was so popular with the colonists that he served alternately as governor and often as deputy governor from 1639 to his death in 1653."

Richard Nicolls was the first English colonial governor of New York province.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Connecticut panhandle</span> Appendage of Connecticut, United States

The Connecticut panhandle is the southwestern appendage of Connecticut, where it abuts New York State. It is contained entirely in Fairfield County and includes all of Greenwich, Stamford, New Canaan, and Darien, as well as parts of Norwalk and Wilton. It has some of the most expensive residential real estate in the United States.

Tobias Saunders was a Deputy to the Rhode Island General Assembly, a Conservator of the Peace and a founding settler of Westerly, Rhode Island.

The towns and cities of Downstate New York were created by the U.S. state of New York as municipalities in order to give residents more direct say over local government. Present-day Westchester, Bronx, New York, Richmond, Kings, Queens, Nassau, and Suffolk counties were part of York Shire from 1664-August 1673 and again from February 1674 until 1683 at which point the Province of New York was divided into counties. From August 1673 to February 1674 New York was under Dutch control and English political units were suspended, then restored under English rule. York Shire was divided into three divisions called ridings, the East, West, and North ridings. In 1683 the colony of New York eliminated shires and ridings in favor of counties, the East Riding becoming Suffolk County, West Riding the counties of Richmond and Kings, while the North Riding became the counties of Westchester, New York, and Queens.

Thomas Bull, also known as Captain Thomas Bull, was an early settler in the Connecticut Colony who is counted as one of the founders of Hartford, Connecticut.

The history of Albany, New York from 1664 to 1784 begins with the English takeover of New Netherland and ends with the ratification of the Treaty of Paris by the Congress of the Confederation in 1784, ending the Revolutionary War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New York – New Jersey Line War</span> 18th-century skirmishes on the New York–New Jersey border

The New York – New Jersey Line War was a series of skirmishes and raids that took place for over half a century between 1701 and 1765 at the disputed border between two American colonies, the Province of New York and the Province of New Jersey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wilhelmus Beekman</span> Dutch politician

Wilhelmus Hendricksen Beekman – also known as William Beekman and Willem Beekman – was a Dutch immigrant to America who came to New Amsterdam from the Netherlands in the same vessel with Director-General and later Governor Peter Stuyvesant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adolphus Philipse</span> Landowner

Adolphus Philipse (1665–1750) was a wealthy landowner of Dutch descent in the Province of New York. In 1697 he purchased a large tract of land along the east bank of the Hudson River stretching all the way to the east to the Connecticut border. Then known as the "Highland Patent" it became in time referred to as the Philipse Patent. After his death the Patent was inherited by his nephew, Frederick Philipse II, his only heir-at-law, who became the second Lord of the Manor of Philipsborough in Westchester County.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philipse Patent</span> British royal patent for land on the Hudson River

The Philipse Patent was a British royal patent for a large tract of land on the east bank of the Hudson River about 50 miles north of New York City. It was purchased in 1697 by Adolphus Philipse, a wealthy landowner of Dutch descent in the Province of New York, and in time became today's Putnam County.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Penn–Calvert boundary dispute</span> Long-running legal conflict

The Penn–Calvert boundary dispute was a long-running legal conflict between William Penn and his heirs on one side, and Charles Calvert, 3rd Baron Baltimore and his heirs on the other side. The overlapping nature of their charters of land in Colonial America required numerous attempts at mediation, surveying, and intervention by the king and courts of England to ultimately be resolved. Subsequent questions over these charters have also been adjudicated by American arbitrators and the Supreme Court of the United States. The boundary dispute shaped the eventual borders of five U.S. states: Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware, New Jersey, and West Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Hartford (1650)</span> Treaty between New Netherland and Connecticut

The Treaty of Hartford is a treaty concluded between New Netherland and Connecticut Colony on September 19, 1650, in Hartford, Connecticut.