Federalist No. 11

Last updated

Federalist No. 11
Alexander Hamilton A17950.jpg
Alexander Hamilton, author of Federalist No. 11
Author Alexander Hamilton
Original titleThe Utility of the Union in Respect to Commercial Relations and a Navy
CountryUnited States
LanguageEnglish
Series The Federalist
Publisher The Independent Journal
Publication date
November 23, 1787
Media typeNewspaper
Preceded by Federalist No. 10  
Followed by Federalist No. 12  

Federalist No. 11 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the eleventh of The Federalist Papers . [1] It was first published in The Independent Journal (New York) on November 23, 1787 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. [2] It is titled "The Utility of the Union in Respect to Commercial Relations and a Navy". [3]

Contents

Summary

The essay begins with Publius admitting that the "adventurous spirit" of America has already made the European countries uneasy about engaging in trade. [3] Publius explains that continued uneasiness will deprive the States of "active commerce." [4] Publius then posits that a Union would counteract that problem by making prohibitory regulations that are uniform throughout the states, thus requiring foreign countries to negotiate with the Union as a whole and bid against each other for trading rights. [5]

Publius then moves to discuss the importance of establishing a federal navy. [6] This would increase the Union's ability to gain access and control the trade opportunities of the West Indies, thus allowing the Union to set prices and control all European trade in the Americas, putting the Union in a commanding position over foreign trade. [7] This "active commerce" in controlling trade, as opposed to "passive commerce," reflects the American spirit. [8]

Publius further emphasizes not just the importance of controlling foreign trade, but also that a Union would allow "an unrestrained intercourse between the States themselves." [9] The naval presence will allow the States to protect trade among themselves and help promote mutual gains. [9] Without a Union between the States, trade would be less successful; "would be fettered, interrupted, and narrowed by a multiplicity of causes." [10]

Background

Federalist Papers No. 11 addresses the necessity of a unified regulation of trade among states under the federal government. At the time, congress did not have the power to regulate the commerce and trade between states or foreign countries. Also, because of the status quo, foreign countries would not agree with individual unnecessary trade agreements with states. [11] Alexander Hamilton saw the necessity of a common regulation to prevent future consequences the country may face when engaging in commerce. He also points out that by having a unified country under the federal regulation, it will create competition between foreign countries for the right to trade. This idea is then later put into effect by stating, "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes" in the constitution also known as the commerce clause. [12]

Analysis

It has been debated in the past regarding the meaning and intent in the regulation of commerce such as in the case of United States v. Lopez . In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had exceeded its constitutional authority under the Commerce Clause when it passed a law prohibiting gun possession in local school zones. [13] One reason was that the regulation of guns in school would not significantly affect interstate commerce and the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional. Some have also argued that the "regulation of commerce" meant the regulation of "gainful activity" and not necessarily goods. [14]

The Navy and Commerce

Alexander Hamilton emphasizes the necessity of a federal navy throughout the paper. He states, "A navy of the United States, as it would embrace the resources of all, is an object far less remote than a navy of any single State or partial confederacy…". He writes about the convenience and many benefits of a federal navy compared to several navies belonging to each state independently. It would allow the transport of a variety of goods instead of specific goods from separate states.

The potential power that the navy would possess causes Hamilton to urge the creation of a unified federal navy. By maintaining a federal navy, he saw that it can be of use to protect and maintain their neutrality in commerce. According to Hamilton, "A nation, despicable by its weakness, forfeits even the privilege of being neutral." He recognizes that the use of the navy would allow protection from foreign countries' demands that would otherwise ruin U.S. commerce.

Related Research Articles

<i>The Federalist Papers</i> Series of 85 essays arguing in favor of the ratification of the US Constitution

The Federalist Papers is a collection of 85 articles and essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the collective pseudonym "Publius" to promote the ratification of the Constitution of the United States. The collection was commonly known as The Federalist until the name The Federalist Papers emerged in the 20th century.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalism in the United States</span> Division of powers between national, state, tribal and local governments

Federalism in the United States is the constitutional division of power between U.S. state governments and the federal government of the United States. Since the founding of the country, and particularly with the end of the American Civil War, power shifted away from the states and toward the national government. The progression of federalism includes dual, cooperative, and new federalism.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 23</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 23 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the twenty-third of The Federalist Papers. It was first published by The New York Packet on December 18, 1787 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. One of the more significant essays in the series, No. 23 attempts to justify the increased strength of the federal government under the proposed United States Constitution, compared to the then-active Articles of Confederation. The paper is entitled "The Necessity of a Government as Energetic as the One Proposed to the Preservation of the Union".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 2</span> Federalist Paper by John Jay

Federalist No. 2, titled "Concerning Dangers From Foreign Force and Influence", is a political essay written by John Jay. It was the second of The Federalist Papers, a series of 85 essays arguing for the ratification of the United States Constitution. The essay was first published in The Independent Journal on October 31, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist Papers were published. Federalist No. 2 established the premise of nationhood that would persist through the series, addressing the issue of political union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 4</span> Federalist Paper by John Jay

Federalist No. 4, titled "The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence", is a political essay by John Jay and the fourth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The Independent Journal on November 7, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist Papers were published. It is the third of four essays by Jay discussing the protection of the United States from dangerous foreign influence and military conflict. It directly continued the argument made in Federalist No. 3, and it was further continued in Federalist No. 5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 6</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 6 is a political essay written by Alexander Hamilton, writing under the pseudonym of Publius, as did James Madison and John Jay in the other Federalist Papers. Published first in The Independent Journal on November 14, 1787, this essay argues for the benefits of a union between the American states. Formally titled "Concerning Dangers from Dissensions Between the States", Federalist No. 6 continues to discuss that the States would devolve into conflict with each other. This discussion is a bastion of Federalist thought in their fight against the Anti-Federalists.  

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 3</span> Federalist Paper by John Jay

Federalist No. 3, titled "The Same Subject Continued: Concerning Dangers from Foreign Force and Influence", is a political essay by John Jay, the third of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The Independent Journal on November 3, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It is the second of four essays by Jay on the benefits of political union in protecting Americans against foreign adversaries, preceded by Federalist No. 2 and followed by Federalist No. 4 and Federalist No. 5.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 12</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 12 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the twelfth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The New York Packet on November 27, 1787 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It is titled "The Utility of the Union In Respect to Revenue".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 14</span> Federalist Paper by James Madison

Federalist No. 14 is an essay by James Madison titled "Objections to the Proposed Constitution From Extent of Territory Answered". This essay is the fourteenth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The New York Packet on November 30, 1787 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It addresses a major objection of the Anti-Federalists to the proposed United States Constitution: that the sheer size of the United States would make it impossible to govern justly as a single country. Madison touched on this issue in Federalist No. 10 and returns to it in this essay.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 13</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 13 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the thirteenth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The Independent Journal on November 28, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It is titled "Advantage of the Union in Respect to Economy in Government".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 15</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 15 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the fifteenth of The Federalist Papers. It was published by The Independent Journal on December 1, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published at the time. No. 15 addresses the failures of the Articles of Confederation to satisfactorily govern the United States; it is the first of six essays on this topic. It is titled "The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 16</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 16, titled "The Same Subject Continued: The Insufficiency of the Present Confederation to Preserve the Union", is an essay by Alexander Hamilton. It is one of the eighty-five articles collected in the document The Federalist Papers. The entire collection of papers was written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Federalist Paper No. 16 was first published on December 4, 1787 by The New York Packet under the pseudonym Publius. According to James Madison, "the immediate object of them was to vindicate and recommend the new Constitution to the State of [New York] whose ratification of the instrument, was doubtful, as well as important". In addition, the articles were written and addressed "To the People of New York".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 22</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 22 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the twenty-second of The Federalist Papers. It was first published by The New York Packet on December 14, 1787, under the pseudonym "Publius", the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. This essay continues with a theme started in Federalist No. 21. It is titled "The Same Subject Continued: Other Defects of the Present Confederation".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 24</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton regarding the common defense

Federalist No. 24 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the twenty-fourth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The Independent Journal on December 19, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It is titled "The Powers Necessary to the Common Defense Further Considered".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 25</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton regarding the common defense

Federalist No. 25 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the twenty-fifth of The Federalist Papers. It was first published in The New York Packet on December 21, 1787, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It continues the discussion begun in Federalist No. 24. No. 25 is titled "The Same Subject Continued: The Powers Necessary to the Common Defense Further Considered".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 49</span> Federalist Paper by James Madison

Federalist No. 49 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-ninth of The Federalist Papers. It was published on February 2, 1788, under the pseudonym "Publius", the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It is titled "Method of Guarding Against the Encroachments of Any One Department of Government by Appealing to the People Through a Convention".

<i>Federalist No. 66</i> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 66 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the sixty-sixth of The Federalist Papers. It was published on March 8, 1788, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. The title is "Objections to the Power of the Senate To Set as a Court for Impeachments Further Considered".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 69</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 69 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the sixty-ninth of The Federalist Papers. It was published on March 14, 1788 under the pseudonym Publius, under which all The Federalist papers were published. The title is "The Real Character of the Executive", and is the third in a series of 11 essays discussing the powers and limitations of the Executive branch in response to the Anti-Federalist Papers, and in comparison to the King of England's powers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Federalist No. 76</span> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 76, written by Alexander Hamilton, was published on April 1, 1788. The Federalist Papers are a series of eighty-five essays written to urge the ratification of the United States Constitution. These letters were written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay under the name of Publius in the late 1780s. This paper discusses the arrangement of the power of appointment and the system of checks and balances. The title is "The Appointing Power of the Executive", and is the tenth in a series of 11 essays discussing the powers and limitations of the Executive branch. There are three options for entrusting power: a single individual, a select congregation, or an individual with the unanimity of the assembly. Hamilton supported bestowing the president with the nominating power but the ratifying power would be granted to the senate in order to have a process with the least bias.

<i>Federalist No. 80</i> Federalist Paper by Alexander Hamilton

Federalist No. 80 is an essay by Alexander Hamilton, the eightieth of The Federalist Papers. It was published on June 21, 1788 under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all The Federalist papers were published. It is titled "The Powers of the Judiciary", and it is the third in a series of six essays discussing the powers and limitations of the judicial branch.

References

  1. ↑ Hamilton, Alexander (December 29, 1998). "Federalist No. 11". The Avalon Project. Lillian Goldman Law Library, Yale University. Retrieved December 7, 2011.
  2. ↑ Hamilton, Alexander. "Federalist No. 11". The Federalist Papers. Library of Congress. Archived from the original on May 7, 2009. Retrieved December 7, 2011.
  3. 1 2 The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, a division of Penguin Books. 1999. p. 79. ISBN   0-451-52881-6.
  4. ↑ The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, a division of Penguin Books. 1999. p. 80. ISBN   0-451-52881-6.
  5. ↑ The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, a division of Penguin Books. 1999. pp. 80–81. ISBN   0-451-52881-6.
  6. ↑ The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, a division of Penguin Books. 1999. p. 81. ISBN   0-451-52881-6.
  7. ↑ The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, a division of Penguin Books. 1999. pp. 81–82. ISBN   0-451-52881-6.
  8. ↑ The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, a division of Penguin Books. 1999. p. 83. ISBN   0-451-52881-6.
  9. 1 2 The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, a division of Penguin Books. 1999. p. 84. ISBN   0-451-52881-6.
  10. ↑ The Federalist Papers. New York: New American Library, a division of Penguin Books. 1999. p. 85. ISBN   0-451-52881-6.
  11. ↑ Losse, Winifred J. (January 1, 1944). "The Foreign Trade of Virginia, 1789-1809". The William and Mary Quarterly. 1 (2): 161–178. doi:10.2307/1921886. JSTOR   1921886.
  12. ↑ Baltzell, George W. "Constitution of the United States - We the People". constitutionus.com. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
  13. ↑ "The Supreme Court . The Future of the Court . Landmark Cases | PBS". www.pbs.org. Retrieved October 26, 2016.
  14. ↑ Barnett, Randy E. (January 1, 2001). "The Original Meaning of the Commerce Clause". The University of Chicago Law Review. 68 (1): 101–147. doi:10.2307/1600443. JSTOR   1600443.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.