M103 heavy tank

Last updated
M103 heavy tank
M103A2 museum.jpg
M103A2 at the Bovington Tank Museum
Type Heavy tank [1]
Place of origin United States
Service history
In service1957–1974
Production history
Manufacturer Chrysler
No. built300
VariantsM103A1, M103A2
Specifications
Mass65 short tons (58 long tons; 59  t)
Length37 ft 2 in (11.33 m)
Width12 ft 2 in (3.71 m)
Height10 ft 6 in (3.20 m)
Crew5 (commander, gunner, driver, 2 loaders)

Armor 127 mm (5 in) @ 60 degrees [2]
254 mm LoS (10 in)
Main
armament
(4.7 in ) 120 mm gun M58, 34 rounds
Secondary
armament
2×.30-cal (7.62 mm) M1919A4E1 machine gun
(co-axial)
1×.50-cal (12.7 mm) M2 AA machine gun
Engine(M103A1) Continental AV1790 12-cylinder air-cooled gasoline
810 hp (604 kW) 
(M103A2) Continental AVDS-1790-2, V12, air-cooled, twin turbocharged diesel
750 hp (560 kW)
Power/weightM103A2: 12.7 hp (9.5 kW) / tonne
Transmission General Motors CD-850-4A or -4B, 2 ranges forward, 1 reverse
Suspension torsion bar
Fuel capacity280 US gallons (1,100 L; 230 imp gal)
Operational
range
M103: 80 mi (130 km)
M103A2: 295 mi (480 km)
Maximum speed M103: 21 mph (34 km/h)
M103A2: 23 mph (37 km/h)

The M103 Heavy Tank (officially designated 120mm Gun Combat Tank M103, initially T43) [3] was a heavy tank that served in the United States Army and the United States Marine Corps during the Cold War. Introduced in 1957, it served until 1974, by which time evolution of the concept of a main battle tank considered heavy tanks obsolete.

Contents

Design and development

In December 1950, the U.S. Army made blueprints for a heavy tank reference design. [4] In January 1951, it awarded Chrysler a $99 million contract to produce the tank. [5] Chrysler tasked Robert T. Keller, the son of Chrysler Board Chairman K.T. Keller, with overseeing its design, and construction at the company's new Newark, Delaware, tank plant. [4]

The first T43 pilot model was completed in November 1951. Officials said the tank would "out-slug any land-fighting machine ever built." [6]

Like the contemporary British Conqueror, the M103 was designed to counter Soviet heavy tanks, such as the later IS-series tanks or the T-10 if conflict with the Eastern Bloc broke out. Its long-ranged 4.7 in (120 mm) cannon was designed to destroy enemy tanks at extreme distances.

Some 300 tanks were built between 1953 and 1954, initially designated T43E1. Details about the tank, including production plans and specifications, were tightly held. Seeking to keep the tank out of public sight, Secretary of Defense Charles E. Wilson nixed an October 1953 exhibition for the American Ordnance Association at Aberdeen Proving Ground. [7] In May 1954, the tank was debuted publicly at a demonstration at the Newark tank plant. [8]

In 1953, the Pentagon began a reversal of the President Truman administration policy of a broad production base in favor of Wilson's "single, efficient producer" concept. In September Wilson chose General Motors over Chrysler to take over production of the M48 Patton. General Motors would also become heir to any additional T43 orders after Chrysler tank production wrapped up in June 1954. [9]

Testing was unsatisfactory, with the tanks failing to meet Continental Army Command's[ clarification needed ] standards and being put into storage in August 1955. Following the approval of 98 improvements the tank was redesignated the M103 Heavy Tank in April 1956. [10] Of the 300 T43E1s built, 80 went to the US Army (74 of which were rebuilt to M103 standard), and 220 were accepted by the US Marine Corps, to be used as infantry support, rebuilt successively to improved M103A1 and then later M103A2 standards.

A House Government Operations subcommittee report in July 1957 called for the heavy tank program to be audited. Investigators had been unable to determine the cost of the program, which was estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars. The report said the Army had hastened production of the tank for war in Korea despite there being no need for it there. The tank was also unsuited to the rigors of the nuclear battlefield, the report said. [11]

Specifics

Following contemporary American design philosophy, the M103 was built with a two-piece, cast elliptic armor scheme, similar to the M48's design. It featured seven road wheels per side, mounted with long-arm independent torsion bars. The 28-inch (71 cm) track was shoed in steel backed rubber chevron tracks, allowing for a ground pressure of 12.9 psi (89 kPa). The Continental AV-1790 engine was placed at the rear of the tank, and produced a maximum output of 810 horsepower (600 kW) and 1,600 pound-feet (2,200 N⋅m) of torque, fed through a General Motors CD-850-4 two-speed transmission. This allowed the 60-short-ton (54 t; 54-long-ton) heavy tank to achieve a maximum road speed of 21 miles per hour (34 km/h) and a maximum climbing gradient of 60%.

Initial production versions suffered a host of drivetrain mechanical problems. The Continental powerpack, shared by the much lighter M48/M60 tanks, was insufficient to drive the much heavier M103. The resulting performance of the tank was dismal; being severely underpowered and very fuel intensive. This presented a host of logistical problems for the vehicle, most prominently the extremely limited range of just 80 miles (130 km). Though this was partially corrected with the introduction of the AV-1790-2 diesel unit, it would remain cumbersome and fuel-thirsty for the majority of its service life.

The crew of an M103A1 consisted of:
1 - driver, 2 - gunner, 3-4 - two loaders, 5 - commander M103A1-crew.svg
The crew of an M103A1 consisted of:
1 - driver, 2 - gunner, 3-4 - two loaders, 5 - commander

For ease of production, many of the large components of the tank were made from cast armor. This design scheme was also much more mass efficient than traditional rolled plate armor. Despite being better protected than the T29-series of prototypes which preceded it, the M103 was nearly 10 short tons (9.1 t; 8.9 long tons) lighter, making it competitive with the Soviet T-10/IS-8 tank. The frontal hull glacis was a compound pike, welded at the center seam, with up to 10-inch (250 mm) thick armor at the front. The turret was a massive single-piece cast design, fitted with heavily sloped 10-inch (250 mm) rolled-homogeneous armor.

The M103 was designed to mount the 4.7 in (120 mm) M58 gun, fitted in the M89 turret mount. Using standard Armor-Piercing Ballistic Cap Tracer Rounds, it was capable of penetrating 221 millimetres (8.7 in) of 30-degree sloped rolled-homogeneous armor at 1,000 yards (910 m) and 196 millimetres (7.7 in) at 2,000 yards (1,800 m). It could also penetrate 124 millimetres (4.9 in) 60-degree sloped rolled-homogeneous armor at 1,000 yards (910 m) and 114 millimetres (4.5 in) at 2,000 yards (1,800 m). The commander could select from 34 rounds of either M358 Armor-Piercing Ballistic Cap Tracer Rounds or M469 HEAT shells, mounted at the rear of the turret and in the hull. With both loaders, the maximum firing rate of the gun was five rounds per minute, owing to the design of the two-piece ammunition. Using the electrohydraulic turret traverse, the gunner could turn the turret at 18 degrees per second, with 15 degrees of elevation and 8 degrees of gun depression.

The armor was made from welded rolled and cast homogeneous steel of varying thickness.

T43 [12] M103 [13] M103A1 [14] M103A2 [15]
Length (gun forward)448.6 in (11.4 m)442.2 in (11.2 m)
Width147.6 in (3.7 m) (over sandshields)143.0 in (3.6 m) (over tracks)
Height126.7 in (3.2 m) (over cupola)140.1 in (3.6 m) (over MG)
Ground clearance16.1 in (40.9 cm)15.4 in (39.1 cm)
Top speed25 mph (40 km/h)21 mph (34 km/h)23 mph (37 km/h)
Fording48 in (1.2 m)48 in (1.2 m) (w/o kit)
96 in (2.4 m) (w/ kit)
Max. grade60%
Max. trench7.5 ft (2.3 m)8.5 ft (2.6 m)
Max. wall27 in (0.7 m)36 in (0.9 m)
Range80 mi (130 km)80 mi (130 km)
145 mi (233 km) (jettison tanks)
300 mi (480 km)
Power810 hp (600 kW) at 2800 rpm740 hp (550 kW) at 2400 rpm
Power-to-weight ratio13.5 hp/ST (11.1 kW/t)13.0 hp/ST (10.7 kW/t)11.7 hp/ST (9.6 kW/t)
Torque1,575 lb⋅ft (2,140 N⋅m) at 2200 rpm1,600 lb⋅ft (2,170 N⋅m) at 2200 rpm1,710 lb⋅ft (2,320 N⋅m) at 1800 rpm
Weight, combat loaded120,000 lb (54,430 kg)125,000 lb (56,700 kg)128,000 lb (58,060 kg)
Ground pressure12.4 psi (85 kPa)12.9 psi (89 kPa)13.0 psi (90 kPa)13.2 psi (91 kPa)
Main armamentT122 4.7 in (120 mm) gun M58 120 mm gun
Elevation, main gun+15° / −8°
Traverse rate20 seconds/360°17 seconds/360°
Elevation rate4°/second
Main gun ammo34 rounds33 rounds38 rounds
Firing rate5 rounds/minute (two loaders)
Armor [13]
AspectThickness - inches (mm)Angle to vertical
degrees
Hull front, upper5 (127)60
Hull front, lower4.5 (114)50
Hull side, upperequals 2 (51)40
Hull side, lowerequals 1.75 (44)30
Hull top1 (25)90
Hull floor, front1.5 (38)90
Hull floor, rear1.25 (32)90
Turret mantlet10–4 (254–102)0–45
Turret front5 (127)50
Turret side5.38–2.78 (137–70)20–40
Turret rear2 (51)40
Turret top1.5 (38)85–90

Service

T43 pilot #1 at the U.S. Army Armor & Cavalry Collection at Fort Benning (now Fort Moore) in 2023 T43 heavy tank Armor & Cavalry Collection.jpg
T43 pilot #1 at the U.S. Army Armor & Cavalry Collection at Fort Benning (now Fort Moore) in 2023
A Marine M103 on American-Spanish naval exercises, October 1964 Amerikaans-Spaanse marine-oefeningen, Bestanddeelnr 917-0691.jpg
A Marine M103 on American-Spanish naval exercises, October 1964

US Army 7th Army wanted the new heavy tank to supplement its M48 tanks. In Europe, the US Army fielded only one battalion of heavy tanks, from January 1958, originally assigned to the 899th Tank Battalion, later re-designated the 2d Battalion, 33d Armor. [3] The US Army heavy armor battalion, in contrast to other armor units, was organized into four tank companies, composed of six platoons each, of which each platoon contained three M103s, for a total of 18 tanks per company. Standard US Army armor battalions at the time had three companies per battalion, each with three five-tank platoons, with 17 tanks per company (two tanks were in headquarters platoon).

One of the flaws of M103 vehicle was it did not have adequate reliability in retreat operations. US Army was aware that more Tiger tanks had been lost during retreat operations than during actual combat, and US Army in Europe could not afford that. In Europe it was found that the engine was underpowered, requiring replacement of engines and transmissions after only about 500 mi (800 km).

In addition, the ammunition stowage was not convenient, repeated firing caused excess chamber erosion, and tracks were easily thrown. Last but not least crew safety, comfort and ability to function were impaired by poor interior arrangement.

The M103 was placed on the road to obsolescence when the US Army shifted to the concept of a single main battle tank optimizing firepower, protection, and mobility in a single medium tank design. The U.S. M60 tank fulfilled the breakthrough functions of M103 heavy tank while retaining the mobility of M48 medium tanks. By that time it was years since US Army had realized Soviet heavy tanks were not as potent as suspected, and thus the M103s were rather overkill and expensive to deal with T-54 and T-55 tanks.

The US Marine Corps assigned one M103 company to each of its three Marine tank battalions, including its Marine reserve units. [16] The M103 was never used in combat.

While the US Army deactivated its heavy armor units with the reception of the new M60 series main battle tanks in 1963, the remaining M103s stayed within the US Marine Corps inventory until they began receiving the M60 series main battle tank. With the disappearance of the heavy tank from US forces came the full acceptance of the main battle tank in 1960 for the US Army, and 1973 for the US Marine Corps. [17] Although the later M1 Abrams main battle tank utilizes the same caliber of main gun, 4.7 in (120 mm), the M103's cannon was a rifled gun firing a separate-loading round, in which the projectile was loaded into the breech, followed by a cartridge case consisting of a brass case, primer, and propellant in a fixed unit. This separate-loading system necessitated the use of two loaders. The only part of the cartridge case consumed during firing was the propellant and a plastic cap on the end of the brass cartridge case. The spent brass cartridge case was ejected after firing. The M1 tank's 4.7 in (120 mm) main gun is a smooth bore firing a semi-caseless round, ejecting only a back cap of the original loaded round; the bulk of the M1's 4.7 in (120 mm) shell casing is consumed during firing.

Ammunition

US Marine Corps 1st Tank Battalion staff sergeant holding an M356 HE-T high-explosive round in 1959 M103 USMC.jpg
US Marine Corps 1st Tank Battalion staff sergeant holding an M356 HE-T high-explosive round in 1959

Ammunition for M103's M58 gun included:

Variants

M51 recovery vehicle under evaluation tests at Fort Knox in 1951 M51 ARV.JPG
M51 recovery vehicle under evaluation tests at Fort Knox in 1951

Operators

Surviving examples

M103A2 at Ft. Lewis M103 Heavy tank at Ft Lewis Military Museum.JPG
M103A2 at Ft. Lewis
M103A2 heavy tank in front of Armed Forces Reserve Center Syracuse AFRC Syracuse M103A2.JPG
M103A2 heavy tank in front of Armed Forces Reserve Center Syracuse
M103 tank at Camp Roberts Historical Museum Camp Roberts M103.jpg
M103 tank at Camp Roberts Historical Museum
Blown out M103 on Ft. Huachuca, Arizona Blown out M103.jpg
Blown out M103 on Ft. Huachuca, Arizona
M103A2 display at the AAF Tank Museum M103a2-aaf.png
M103A2 display at the AAF Tank Museum

Existing M103 and M103A2s include:

LocationModel
Range 408A, Camp Pendleton, California Blown out, former practice target
U.S. Army Ordnance Center and Museum at the Aberdeen Proving Grounds M103
Radcliff, Kentucky M103
Shively, Kentucky M103A2
Mt. Sterling, Kentucky M103A1
Rod Lowe Post #124 American Legion, Greensburg, Kentucky M103A1
Fort Lewis, WashingtonM103A2
Fort McClellan, Anniston, AlabamaM103A2
45th Infantry Museum, Oklahoma City, OklahomaM103A2
Armed Forces Center, Syracuse, New YorkM103A2
Credit Island Park, Davenport, IowaM103
Military Vehicle Technology Foundation in Portola Valley, CaliforniaM103A2
3d Cavalry Regiment Museum, Fort Cavazos, TexasM103
Marine Corps Mechanized Museum, Camp Pendleton, California
Newman Park, Sweetwater, Texasnon-functioning
Pioneer Park, Nacogdoches, Texasnon-functioning
Euclid City Hall, E. 222nd Street. Euclid, OhioM103A2
Heritage Center of the Yuma Proving Ground, Yuma, Arizona
Dugway Proving Ground, UtahM103 hulk for testing
Former VFW in Anniston, Alabama
The Tank Museum, Bovington, UKM103A2, running condition
American Armor Foundation Tank Museum, Danville, VirginiaM103A2
United States Army TACOM Life Cycle Management Command, Warren, Michigan
Camp Shelby, MississippiM103
U.S. Army Armor & Cavalry Collection, Fort Moore, GeorgiaM103A1, M103A2, T43 & M51
Range 68 MOUT site, Fort Liberty, North Carolinanon-functioning
US Marine Corps Reserve Center, Yakima, Washington. This command has been moved onto the Yakima Firing Center, and they took their display tanks with them. They are no longer publicly accessible. The M103 is at 46°40'59.99"N 120° 27'10.94"WM103A2
A second vehicle is on display behind the old Marine Reserve Center, Yakima WA, at the Calvary Cemetery, at 46°34'28.79"N 120°32'21.26"WM103A2
Institute of Military Technology, Titusville, FloridaM103A2
Clay County Veterans Memorial in Lineville City Park, Lineville, Alabama
Camp Roberts Historical Museum, Camp Roberts, Californianon-functioning, rusted interior, missing track pieces and wheels on the exterior
Fort Huachuca, Arizona, at 31°37'27.94"N 110°19'45.42"W, 31°37'28.04"N 110°19'38.20"W, and 31°37'30.04"N 110°19'36.56"W. 2 others are unlocated.5 M103A2s All have been exposed to the elements, with all missing parts.
Pima Air & Space Museum, Tucson, Arizona in outdoor storage.M103A2

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M1 Abrams</span> American main battle tank

The M1 Abrams is a third-generation American main battle tank designed by Chrysler Defense and named for General Creighton Abrams. Conceived for modern armored ground warfare, it is one of the heaviest tanks in service at nearly 73.6 short tons. It introduced several modern technologies to United States armored forces, including a multifuel turbine engine, sophisticated Chobham composite armor, a computer fire control system, separate ammunition storage in a blowout compartment, and NBC protection for crew safety. Initial models of the M1 were armed with a 105 mm M68 gun, while later variants feature a license-produced Rheinmetall 120 mm L/44 designated M256.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M551 Sheridan</span> American light tank

The M551 "Sheridan" AR/AAV was a light tank developed by the United States and named after General Philip Sheridan, of American Civil War fame. It was designed to be landed by parachute and to swim across rivers. It was armed with the technically advanced but troublesome M81/M81 Modified/M81E1 152 mm gun/launcher, which fired both conventional ammunition and the MGM-51 Shillelagh guided anti-tank missile.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M26 Pershing</span> American medium/heavy battle tank (1944–1951)

The M26 Pershing is a heavy tank/medium tank formerly used by the United States Army. It was used in the last months of World War II during the Invasion of Germany and extensively during the Korean War. The tank was named after General of the Armies John J. Pershing, who led the American Expeditionary Force in Europe in World War I.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M48 Patton</span> Cold War-era American main battle tank

The M48 Patton is an American first-generation main battle tank (MBT) introduced in February 1952, being designated as the 90mm Gun Tank: M48. It was designed as a replacement for the M26 Pershing, M4 Sherman, M46 and M47 Patton tanks, and was the main battle tank of the U.S. Army and U.S. Marine Corps in the Vietnam War. Nearly 12,000 M48s were built, mainly by Chrysler and American Locomotive Company, from 1952 to 1961. The M48 Patton was the first U.S. medium gun tank with a four-man crew, featuring a centerline driver's compartment and no bow machine gunner. As with nearly all new armored vehicles it had a wide variety of suspension systems, cupola styles, power packs, fenders and other details among individual tanks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M47 Patton</span> American main battle tank

The M47 Patton was an American Medium tank, a development of the M46 Patton mounting an updated turret, and was in turn further developed as the M48 Patton. It was the second American tank to be named after General George S. Patton, commander of the U.S. Third Army during World War II and one of the earliest American advocates of tanks in battle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M60 tank</span> American second generation main battle tank

The M60 is an American second-generation main battle tank (MBT). It was officially standardized as the Tank, Combat, Full Tracked: 105-mm Gun, M60 in March 1959. Although developed from the M48 Patton, the M60 tank series was never officially christened as a Patton tank. It has been called a "product-improved descendant" of the Patton tank's design. The design similarities are evident comparing the original version of the M60 and the M48A2. The United States fully committed to the MBT doctrine in 1963, when the Marine Corps retired the last (M103) heavy tank battalion. The M60 tank series became America's primary main battle tank during the Cold War, reaching a production total of 15,000 M60s. Hull production ended in 1983, but 5,400 older models were converted to the M60A3 variant ending in 1990.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Royal Ordnance L7</span> Rifled tank gun

The Royal Ordnance L7, officially designated Gun, 105 mm, Tank, L7, is the basic model of the United Kingdom's most successful tank gun. It is a 105 mm L/52 rifled design by the Royal Ordnance Factories, intended for use in armoured fighting vehicles, replacing the older QF 20-pounder (84 mm) gun mounted on the British Centurion tank. The successful L7 gun has been fitted on many armoured vehicles, including the Centurion, the German Leopard 1 and, in an altered design, as the M68 gun in several variants of the US M48 Patton and M60.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T95 medium tank</span> American prototype medium tank developed from 1955 to 1959

The T95 was an American prototype medium tank developed from 1955 to 1959. These tanks used many advanced or unusual features, such as siliceous-cored armor, new transmissions, and OPTAR fire-control systems. The OPTAR incorporated an electro-optical rangefinder and was mounted on the right side of the turret, and was used in conjunction with the APFSDS-firing 90 mm T208 smoothbore gun, which had a rigid mount without a recoil system. In addition, although the tanks were designed with a torsion beam suspension, a hydropneumatic suspension was fitted, and one of the tanks was fitted with a Solar Saturn gas turbine for demonstration purposes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T30 heavy tank</span> American heavy tank

The Heavy Tank T30 was a World War II American tank project developed to counter new German tanks, such as Tiger I, Tiger II, and tank destroyers, such as the Jagdtiger, or Soviet heavy tanks, such as IS-2 or IS-3. The T30 was designed at the same time as the T29 Heavy Tank.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">37 mm gun M3</span> American anti-tank gun

The 37 mm gun M3 is the first dedicated anti-tank gun fielded by United States forces in numbers. Introduced in 1940, it became the standard anti-tank gun of the U.S. infantry with its size enabling it to be pulled by a jeep. However, the continuing improvement of German tanks quickly rendered the 37 mm ineffective and, by 1943, it was being gradually replaced in the European and Mediterranean theaters by the more powerful British-developed 57 mm gun M1. In the Pacific, where the Japanese tank threat was less significant, the M3 remained in service until the end of the war, but some 57mm guns were issued.

Tank development both evolved considerably from World War II and played a key role during the Cold War (1945–1990). The period pitted the nations of the Eastern Bloc and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO against each other.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">120 mm Gun M1</span> Anti-aircraft gun

The 120 mm Gun M1 was the United States Army's standard super-heavy anti-aircraft gun during World War II and the Korean War, complementing the smaller and more mobile M2 90 mm gun in service. Its maximum altitude was about 60,000 ft (18,000 m), which earned it the nickname stratosphere gun.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">76 mm gun M1</span> American tank gun

The 76 mm gun M1 was an American World War II–era tank gun developed by the U.S United States Ordnance Department in 1942 to supplement the 75 mm gun on the basic Medium tank M4. It was also used to arm the M18 Hellcat tank destroyer.

The M1 Abrams main battle tank has been in service since 1980. Since then, it has gone through dozens of upgrades and been the baseline variant of several vehicles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanks of the United States</span> Tanks used or produced by the United States

The United States has produced tanks since their inception in World War I, up until the present day. While there were several American experiments in tank design, the first American tanks to see service were copies of French light tanks and a joint heavy tank design with the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tanks of the United States in the Cold War</span>

This article deals with the history and development of American tanks from the end of World War II and during the Cold War.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T57 heavy tank</span> Heavy tank

The T57 heavy tank was an experimental heavy tank developed by the American military during the Cold War era as a further development of the M103 heavy tank. Featuring heavy armor and a long range 120 mm rifled gun, the T57 was supposed to serve as a replacement to the M103 in service with American heavy tank units in Europe. Armor on the hull front was to range between 5–8 in (130–200 mm) in thickness and the turret was to be 5.98 in (152 mm) at maximum on all sides. Like the French AMX 50 project, it was to feature an oscillating turret and was also to receive a 153 mm gun. Experiments were also conducted to investigate mounting a 203 mm gun, but this was soon found to be infeasible. When multiple problems were discovered in the turret oscillation system on account of the excess weight of the heavily armored turret and the gun, the project was dropped.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T110</span> Heavy tank

The 120 mm Gun Tank T110, known during early development as the TS-31, was a canceled heavy tank project which began in 1954. It was an attempt to replace the T43 heavy tank. The T110 tank was a proposal created by Detroit Arsenal, and was introduced in a Detroit conference held in 1954. It was further developed by Chrysler.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T34 heavy tank</span> Heavy tank

The T34 Heavy Tank was an American design for a heavy tank. It evolved from the T29 Heavy Tank and T30 Heavy Tank in 1945, using the same chassis, but sporting a 120 mm (4.72 in) modified 120 mm Gun M1 anti-aircraft gun. Extra armor plating was applied to the rear of the turret bustle as a counterweight for the heavier 120mm T53 main gun. No production orders were placed for the T34, which was felt to be too heavy.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M68 (tank gun)</span> Tank gun

The M68 is an American 105 mm tank gun. It uses British-designed L7 gun tube and cartridges with an American-designed mount, breech assembly and recoil mechanism.

References

  1. Hunnicutt 1984, p. 35.
  2. Hunnicutt 1988, p. 144.
  3. 1 2 Hunnicutt 1988, p. 134.
  4. 1 2 Palmer, C.B. (27 April 1951). "Fifty-Ton Monsters With a Mighty Punch". The New York Times. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
  5. Abel, Elie (19 January 1951). "Chrysler to Build a New Super-tank". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 August 2018.
  6. "Super-Tank--It Will 'Outslug Anything'-- Built 10 Months After Plant Was Started". The New York Times. 19 December 1951. Retrieved 24 August 2018.
  7. "New Tank Display Vetoed by Wilson". The New York Times. 4 October 1953. Retrieved 25 August 2018.
  8. Weart, William G. (14 May 1954). "Long-Secret Tank Tested In Public". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 August 2018.
  9. Abel, Elie (12 September 1953). "G. M. Is Heir to New Orders". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 August 2018.
  10. Hunnicutt 1984, p. 124.
  11. Trussell, C.P. (31 July 1957). "Tank Order Held a Costly Failure". The New York Times. Retrieved 25 August 2018.
  12. Hunnicutt 1988, p. 204.
  13. 1 2 Hunnicutt 1988, p. 205.
  14. Hunnicutt 1988, p. 206.
  15. Hunnicutt 1988, p. 207.
  16. Hunnicutt 1988, p. 140.
  17. Hunnicutt 1984, p. 78.
  18. Hunnicutt 1984, p. 115.
  19. Hunnicutt 1984, p. 161-162.
  20. Hunnicutt 1984, p. 160.

Bibliography