McNally v R

Last updated

McNally v R
London The Royal Court of justice - panoramio (2).jpg
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Citation(s)EWCA Crim 1051 (2013)
Legislation cited Sexual Offences Act 2003
Case history
Prior action(s)R v McNally

McNally v R [Crim 1051 (2013)], is a 2013 court decision in which the English and Wales Court of Appeals (EWCA) ruled that Scottish student Justine McNally's prior conviction of six counts of sexual assault by penetration [1] would be upheld. McNally's sentence, however, was reduced. The convictions were made under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Various other cases were explored to maintain the conviction, expanding the previously slim "rape by deception" laws. [2] McNally v R was one of the first cases to display gender fraud or gender deception arguments. [3]

Contents

Background

Justine McNally and a girl, referred to in court records as M, met on an online gaming site. McNally was a Scottish 13-year-old, and M was a year younger and living in London. On the site, McNally used a male avatar named Scott.  Over three and a half years, the two developed an internet relationship which became sexual. [4]

McNally and M met for the first time in person after M's 16th birthday, in March 2011. McNally presented as a boy, wore a dildo underneath trousers, and went by the name Scott. [1] Over the next few months, McNally visited M four times. On the first visit, they kissed, and M received oral sex from McNally. McNally declined to receive oral sex from M. M also brought condoms, intending to have intercourse with McNally, but McNally declined. It was alleged that McNally penetrated M with the dildo, but McNally denied this charge and it was not pursued. [1]

On the second occasion, M and McNally engaged in further sexual activity. On the third visit, they talked about having sex but McNally expressed disinterest in trying again. [1] On the fourth visit, M's mother confronted McNally about "really being a girl". M's mother told M about her suspicions, and McNally revealed to M a Facebook profile in McNally's birth name, Justine. M felt "physically sick" and said that McNally had lied to her for four years. [2]

On 7 November 2011, M's mother made a complaint to McNally's school, and the police were notified. M said she was heterosexual and would not have engaged in sexual activity with "Scott" if she had known that McNally was a girl. [1]

In 2012, McNally pleaded guilty to six counts of sexual assault by penetration under the Sexual Offences Act 2003. McNally was sentenced on each count to 3 years of detention and received a three-year restraining order [1] prohibiting contact with M or her mother.

Court decision

In this case, the appellant challenged all six counts of assault by penetration and McNally's sentence of three years in detention. The convictions were upheld, but McNally's sentence was reduced from three years to nine months and suspension for two years. [4] McNally also remained on the sex offender registry. [1]

Lord Justice Leveson examined previous usages of the Sexual Offences Act of 2003 in order to uphold McNally's earlier convictions. [1]

Implications

McNally v R discussed how in a previous case, HIV-AIDS status was not a sufficient reason for vitiating consent. [4] [ failed verification ] Despite this, the court decided that "gender deception" can vitiate consent.

Sexuality justice theorist Joseph Fischel [5] describes this trend:

In such cases, juries and judges have held that the young woman's consent to sexual contact (whether kissing or vaginal penetration) was vitiated by the defendant dissembling or misrepresenting their gender.

Subsequent cases of "gender deception" proliferated:

McNally was an important case in popular discourse, opening up discussion about legal discrimination against transgender and gender non-conforming people in sexual assault and rape law. [12]

Criticism

Various scholars have criticized the court decision. Legal theorist Alex Sharpe [13] offers a dissenting argument in "Queering Judgement: The Case of Gender Identity Fraud", [12] suggesting that McNally v R and related cases undermine the privacy rights of transgender and gender non-conforming people. [3]

Joseph Fischel suggested that the framing of the McNally decision as "gender fraud" not only subjugates the dignity and equality of transgender people, but also their sexual autonomy. [2] He suggests questioning the expectant conditions under which the 'deception' takes place:

The expectation that genitals correspond to gender identification is a normative one, a resolutely heteronormative one. That an expectation is socially normative need not entail that the failure of the expectation be legally actionable. [2]

See also

Related Research Articles

Sexual assault is an act in which one intentionally sexually touches another person without that person's consent, or coerces or physically forces a person to engage in a sexual act against their will. It is a form of sexual violence that includes child sexual abuse, groping, rape, drug facilitated sexual assault, and the torture of the person in a sexual manner.

Prison sexuality consists of sexual relationships between prisoners or between a prisoner and a prison employee or other persons to whom prisoners have access. Since prisons are usually separated by sex, most sexual activity is with a same-sex partner. Exceptions to this include sex with spouses/partners during conjugal visits and sex with a prison employee of the opposite sex.

Some victims of rape or other sexual violence incidents are male. It is estimated that approximately one in six men experienced sexual abuse during childhood. Historically, rape was thought to be, and defined as, a crime committed solely against females. This belief is still held in some parts of the world, but rape of males is now commonly criminalized and has been subject to more discussion than in the past.

The legal age of consent for sexual activity varies by jurisdiction across Asia. The specific activity engaged in or the gender of participants can also be relevant factors. Below is a discussion of the various laws dealing with this subject. The highlighted age refers to an age at or above which an individual can engage in unfettered sexual relations with another who is also at or above that age. Other variables, such as homosexual relations or close in age exceptions, may exist, and are noted when relevant.

The ages of consent for sexual activity vary from age 15 to 18 across Australia, New Zealand and other parts of Oceania. The specific activity and the gender of its participants is also addressed by the law. The minimum age is the age at or above which an individual can engage in unfettered sexual relations with another person of minimum age. Close in age exceptions may exist and are noted where applicable. In Vanuatu the homosexual age of consent is set higher at 18, while the heterosexual age of consent is 15. Same sex sexual activity is illegal at any age for males in Papua New Guinea, Kiribati, Samoa, Niue, Tonga and Tuvalu; it is outlawed for both men and women in the Solomon Islands. In all other places the age of consent is independent of sexual orientation or gender.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ages of consent in North America</span> Age of consent for sexual activity in countries in North America

In North America, the legal age of consent relating to sexual activity varies by jurisdiction.

Rape is a type of sexual assault initiated by one or more persons against another person without that person's consent. The act may be carried out by physical force, under threat or manipulation, by impersonation, or with a person who is incapable of giving valid consent.

Rape by gender classifies types of rape by the sex and/or gender of both the rapist and the victim. This scope includes both rape and sexual assault more generally. Most research indicates that rape affects women disproportionately, with the majority of people convicted being men; however, since the broadening of the definition of rape in 2012 by the FBI, more attention is being given to male rape, including females raping males.

Rape in the Philippines is considered a criminal offense. In Philippine jurisprudence, it is a heinous crime punishable by reclusión perpetua when committed against women. Rape of males is also legally recognized as rape by sexual assault, which is penalized by imprisonment of six to twelve years.

In common law jurisdictions, statutory rape is nonforcible sexual activity in which one of the individuals is below the age of consent. Although it usually refers to adults engaging in sexual contact with minors under the age of consent, it is a generic term, and very few jurisdictions use the actual term statutory rape in the language of statutes. In statutory rape, overt force or threat is usually not present. Statutory rape laws presume coercion because a minor or mentally disabled adult is legally incapable of giving consent to the act.

Rape is a statutory offence in England and Wales. The offence is created by section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003:

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(2) Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps A has taken to ascertain whether B consents.
(3) Sections 75 and 76 apply to an offence under this section.

(4) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life.

Rape by deception is a situation in which the perpetrator deceives the victim into participating in a sexual act to which they would otherwise not have consented, had they not been deceived. Deception can occur in many forms, such as illusory perceptions, false statements, and false actions.

Punishment for rape in Pakistan under the Pakistani laws is either death penalty or imprisonment of between ten and twenty-five years. For cases related to gang rape, the punishment is either death penalty or life imprisonment. DNA test and other scientific evidence are used in prosecuting rape cases in Pakistan.

Rape is the fourth most common crime against women in India. According to the 2021 annual report of the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), 31,677 rape cases were registered across the country, or an average of 86 cases daily, a rise from 2020 with 28,046 cases, while in 2019, 32,033 cases were registered. Of the total 31,677 rape cases, 28,147(nearly 89%) of the rapes were committed by persons known to the victim. The share of victims who were minors or below 18 – the legal age of consent – stood at 10%.

S v Masiya is an important case in South African criminal law, decided by the Constitutional Court.

People v. Turner, formally The People of the State of California v. Brock Allen Turner (2015), was a criminal case in which Brock Allen Turner was convicted by jury trial of three counts of felony sexual assault.

The La Manada rape case, also known as the wolf pack case, began with the gang rape of an 18-year-old woman on 7 July 2016 during the San Fermín celebrations in Pamplona, Navarre, Spain. The case drew intense public scrutiny as it called into question the definition of rape under Spanish law. Five men, including a member of the Civil Guard and another of the Spanish Army from Seville, filmed themselves repeatedly attacking the girl in the vestibule of an apartment building. La Manada means "The pack" in Spanish.

Rape in Alabama is currently defined across three sections of its Criminal Code: Definitions, Rape in the First Degree, and Rape in the Second Degree. Each section addresses components of the crime such as age, sentencing, the genders of the individuals involved, and the acts involved.

Sexual consent plays an important role in laws regarding rape, sexual assault and other forms of sexual violence. In a court of law, whether or not the alleged victim had freely given consent, and whether or not they were deemed to be capable of giving consent, can determine whether the alleged perpetrator is guilty of rape, sexual assault or some other form of sexual misconduct.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 "McNally v R. [2013] EWCA Crim 1051 (27 June 2013)". British and Irish Legal Information Institute (BAILII). Archived from the original on 21 November 2021. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Fischel, Joseph (2019). Screw Consent. Oakland, California: University of California Press. pp. 94–116. ISBN   9780520295414.
  3. 1 2 Gittos, Luke (7 June 2016). "Our rape laws discriminate against trans people". Politics.co.uk . Senate Media. Archived from the original on 20 January 2021. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
  4. 1 2 3 dls (13 July 2021). "McNally v Regina: CACD 27 Jun 2013". swarb.co.uk. Archived from the original on 18 June 2021. Retrieved 10 March 2022.
  5. ↑ "Joseph Fischel bio at Yale.edu". Archived from the original on 15 July 2021. Retrieved 12 March 2022.
  6. ↑ Hattenstone, Simon (15 July 2017). "'I was pretending to be a boy for a variety of reasons': the strange case of Gayle Newland". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 27 September 2021. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  7. ↑ Robertson, John (9 April 2013). "Woman who pretended to be boy escapes jail term". The Scotsman . Edinburgh, Scotland: JPIMedia. Archived from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  8. ↑ "Female footballer who posed as boy to trick young girls into sex acts is jailed". The Daily Telegraph. 19 May 2017.
  9. ↑ "Gemma Watts: Woman who posed as boy to sexually assault up to 50 girls is jailed". The Guardian. 10 January 2020.
  10. 1 2 "Woman who posed as a man to have sex with teenage girls jailed". The Guardian . Press Association. 23 March 2016. Archived from the original on 13 January 2022. Retrieved 11 March 2022.
  11. ↑ "Woman jailed after posing as man and duping partner into sex". The Guardian. 20 December 2023.
  12. 1 2 Sharpe, Alex (2017). "Queering Judgement: The Case of Gender Identity Fraud" (PDF). The Journal of Criminal Law. 81 (5): 417–435. doi:10.1177/0022018317728828. S2CID   206414559. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 10 March 2022– via Sage Publications.
  13. ↑ "Alex Sharpe". University of Warwick . Retrieved 22 March 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.