Mental Health Systems Act of 1980

Last updated

Mental Health Systems Act of 1980
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long titleA bill to improve the provision of mental health services and otherwise promote mental health throughout the United States; and for other purposes.
Acronyms (colloquial)MHSA
Enacted bythe 96th United States Congress
Citations
Public law Pub.L. 96-398
Codification
Acts amended Community Mental Health Centers Act, Public Health Service Act, Social Security Act
Titles amended42
U.S.C. sections created 42 U.S.C.   §§ 94019523
U.S.C. sections amended 42 U.S.C.   § 210, § 225a, § 242a, § 300m, § 1396b, § 2689
Legislative history

The Mental Health Systems Act of 1980 (MHSA) was legislation signed by American President Jimmy Carter which provided grants to community mental health centers. In 1981 President Ronald Reagan, who had made major efforts during his governorship to reduce funding and enlistment for California mental institutions, pushed a political effort through the Democratically controlled House of Representatives and a Republican controlled Senate to repeal most of MHSA. [1] The MHSA was considered landmark legislation in mental health care policy.

Contents

Historical background

In the backdrop of the 1960s and 1970s there was a rise in the community health movement as a response to deinstitutionalization efforts in health care. Coinciding with a movement during the 1970s for rehabilitation of people with severe mental illnesses, the Mental Health Systems Act supported and financed community mental health support systems, which coordinated general health care, mental health care, and social support services. [2] Before this movement gained momentum, mentally ill individuals were often placed in some state run psychiatric hospitals for extended periods, where they received long-term custodial care. [3] The community mental health movement sought to shift the focus of care from institutional settings to community-based services, transitioning from care to community based services, aiming for more compassionate and efficient treatment with the goal of providing more humane and effective treatment for those struggling with their mental health. [4] One pivotal legislation supporting this shift was the Mental Retardation Facilities and Community Mental Health Centers Construction Act of 1963, also known as the Community Mental Health Act (CMHCA). It provided federal funding for the establishment of community mental health centers (CMHCs) across the country. [5] These centers were intended to offer a range of mental health services, including outpatient care, crisis intervention, and rehabilitation, with the goal of reducing the need for long-term institutionalization. [6] However, by the late 1970s, it became clear that the initial promise of the community mental health movement had not been fully realized. While many CMHCs had been established, they faced challenges in securing ongoing funding and providing comprehensive services to individuals with mental illnesses. [7] The law followed the 1978 Report of the President's Commission on Mental Health, which made recommendations for improving mental health care in the United States. While some concerns existed about the methodology followed by the President's Committee, the report served as the foundation for the MHSA, which in turn was seen as landmark legislation in U.S. mental health policy. [8] In response to these challenges, Congress passed the Mental Health Systems Act in 1980.

Short life of the act

The Mental Health Systems Act (MHSA) of 1980 could be considered as some sort of landmark legislation passed by the United States Congress, it has as its main goal to fundamentally reform the mental health care system in the country by emphasizing in community based care where focus of mental health services would shift from institutionalization towards community-based, where states would provide appropriate treatment and related services in most supportive settings, with oversight and funding. [9] It tried to address deficiencies and shortcomings of the existing mental health system by boosting federal funding and support for community-based services. The act emphasized the importance of comprehensive, integrated mental health care that addressed the needs of individuals across the lifespan and provided support for services such as crisis intervention, rehabilitation, and housing. The MHSA represented a moment in the evolution of health policy in the United States as it was enacted during a time when there was increased awareness and advocacy for mental health services. The goal was to revitalize the community health movement that began in the 1960s by prompting states to amend their laws to ensure protection and services for mental health patients while enhancing community based mental health services at a national level. Additionally it introduced a Patients' Bill of Rights Act, which served as the Patients' Bill of Rights specifically tailored for mental health patients. It also included an advocacy provision offering grants for experimental pilot programs designed to provide mental health advocacy services to individuals, with mental disabilities. [10]

Key components

Despite its objectives some members of Congress and the Reagan administration opposed the Mental Health Systems Act due to doubts about the governments role, in funding and supervising mental health services. [14] [15] [16]

Repeal of most of the provisions in 1981

The Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, passed by a Democratic-controlled House of Representatives and a Republican-controlled Senate, and signed by President Ronald Reagan on August 13, 1981, repealed most of the Mental Health Systems Act. The Patients' Bill of Rights, section 501, was not repealed; per Congressional record, the Congress felt that state provisions were sufficient and section 501 served as a recommendation to states to review and refine existing policies. [17]

Most of the provisions, in 1981 were repealed by President Ronald Reagan after taking office as part of his efforts to cut spending and reduce government involvement in social welfare programs. [18]

Of the Mental Health Systems Act Reagan’s administration introduced the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 which combined funding for social service programs, including mental health services into a single grant given to states. Supporters believed this approach gave states flexibility and independence. Critics feared it would result in reduced funding for mental health services and go against the community mental health movements objectives. [19] The repeal occurred within the broader context of shifting political ideologies and priorities in the United States, following the election of President Ronald Reagan in 1980. Reagan advocated for smaller government, reduced federal spending, and greater emphasis on states' rights and local control. With a focus on government decreased spending and promoting states rights and local governance there was a reevaluation of federal involvement and financing in areas, like mental health. In 1981, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) was approved by the National Congress and signed into law by President Reagan. [20] It included provisions that repealed most of the MHSA, discontinuing federal funding and the support for community mental health centers established under the MHSA. OBRA redirected mental health funding mechanisms and transferred more responsibility for mental health services to the states, reducing significantly federal funding for mental health programs. [21] [22] The repeal of most provisions of the MHSA in 1981 reflected broader shifts in political priorities, budgetary constraints, [23] and changing attitudes toward federal involvement in mental health policy and funding. It was primarily driven by several reasons and circumstances.

Consequences of the repeal

Undoubtedly the repeal of the Mental Health Systems Act had an effect on the health system in America. The decrease in funding for health services led to service cuts and closures of numerous community mental health centers. Individuals with illnesses encountered increased difficulties, in accessing care with facing homelessness, incarceration or inadequate support. The Mental Health Systems Act of 1980 was an initiative aimed at enhancing and broadening community based health services across the country. Yet its influence was brief as changes, in politics during the 1980s resulted in its removal and a notable decrease in government backing for health programs. Though the objectives of the community mental health initiative are still applicable today the difficulties in obtaining funding and assistance, for health services persist as a significant issue.[ citation needed ]

See also

Related Research Articles

Care in the Community is a British policy of deinstitutionalisation, treating and caring for physically and mentally disabled people in their homes rather than in an institution. Institutional care was the target of widespread criticism during the 1960s and 1970s, but it was not until 1983 that the government of Margaret Thatcher adopted a new policy of care after the Audit Commission published a report called 'Making a Reality of Community Care' which outlined the advantages of domiciliary care.

In November 2004, voters in the U.S. state of California passed Proposition 63, the Mental Health Services Act (MHSA), which has been designed to expand and transform California's county mental health service systems. The MHSA is funded by imposing an additional one percent tax on individual, but not corporate, taxable income in excess of one million dollars. In becoming law in January 2005, the MHSA represents the latest in a Californian legislative movement, begun in the 1990s, to provide better coordinated and more comprehensive care to those with serious mental illness, particularly in underserved populations. Its claim of successes thus far, such as with the development of innovative and integrated Full Service Partnerships (FSPs), are not without detractors who highlight many problems but especially a lack of oversight, large amount of unspent funds, poor transparency, lack of engagement in some communities, and a lack of adherence to required reporting as challenges MHSA implementation must overcome to fulfill the law's widely touted potential.

Laura's Law is a California state law that allows for court-ordered assisted outpatient treatment. To qualify for the program, the person must have a serious mental illness plus a recent history of psychiatric hospitalizations, jailings or acts, threats or attempts of serious violent behavior towards self or others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mental Health Act 1983</span> Law in England and Wales

The Mental Health Act 1983 is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. It covers the reception, care and treatment of mentally disordered people, the management of their property and other related matters, forming part of the mental health law for the people in England and Wales. In particular, it provides the legislation by which people diagnosed with a mental disorder can be detained in a hospital or police custody and have their disorder assessed or treated against their wishes, informally known as "sectioning". Its use is reviewed and regulated by the Care Quality Commission. The Act was significantly amended by the Mental Health Act 2007. A white paper proposing changes to the act was published in 2021 following an independent review of the act by Simon Wessely.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Long-term care</span> Services for the elderly or those with chronic illness or disability

Long-term care (LTC) is a variety of services which help meet both the medical and non-medical needs of people with a chronic illness or disability who cannot care for themselves for long periods. Long-term care is focused on individualized and coordinated services that promote independence, maximize patients' quality of life, and meet patients' needs over a period of time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Community Mental Health Act</span> 1963 American law

The Community Mental Health Act of 1963 (CMHA) was an act to provide federal funding for community mental health centers and research facilities in the United States. This legislation was passed as part of John F. Kennedy's New Frontier. It led to considerable deinstitutionalization.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Deinstitutionalisation</span> Replacement of psychiatric hospitals

Deinstitutionalisation is the process of replacing long-stay psychiatric hospitals with less isolated community mental health services for those diagnosed with a mental disorder or developmental disability. In the late 20th century, it led to the closure of many psychiatric hospitals, as patients were increasingly cared for at home, in halfway houses and clinics, in regular hospitals, or not at all.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Diana Zuckerman</span> American health policy analyst

Diana M. Zuckerman is an American health policy analyst who focuses on the implications of policies for public health and patients' health. She specializes in national health policy, particularly in women's health and the safety and effectiveness of medical products. She is the President of the National Center for Health Research and the Cancer Prevention and Treatment Fund.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medicare for All Act</span> Proposed U.S. healthcare reform legislation

The Medicare for All Act, also known as the Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act or United States National Health Care Act, is a bill first introduced in the United States House of Representatives by Representative John Conyers (D-MI) in 2003, with 38 co-sponsors. In 2019, the original 16-year-old proposal was renumbered, and Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) introduced a broadly similar, but more detailed, bill, HR 1384, in the 116th Congress. As of November 3, 2019, it had 116 co-sponsors still in the House at the time, or 49.8% of House Democrats.

In the field of medicine, a healthcare proxy is a document with which a patient appoints an agent to legally make healthcare decisions on behalf of the patient, when the patient is incapable of making and executing the healthcare decisions stipulated in the proxy. Once the healthcare proxy is effective, the agent continues making healthcare decisions as long as the primary individual is legally competent to decide. Moreover, in legal-administrative functions, the healthcare proxy is a legal instrument akin to a "springing" healthcare power of attorney. The proxy must declare the healthcare agent who will gain durable power attorney. This document also notifies of the authority given from the principal to the agent and states the limitations of this authority.

Healthcare reform in the United States has a long history. Reforms have often been proposed but have rarely been accomplished. In 2010, landmark reform was passed through two federal statutes: the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), signed March 23, 2010, and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, which amended the PPACA and became law on March 30, 2010.

Community mental health services (CMHS), also known as community mental health teams (CMHT) in the United Kingdom, support or treat people with mental disorders in a domiciliary setting, instead of a psychiatric hospital (asylum). The array of community mental health services vary depending on the country in which the services are provided. It refers to a system of care in which the patient's community, not a specific facility such as a hospital, is the primary provider of care for people with a mental illness. The goal of community mental health services often includes much more than simply providing outpatient psychiatric treatment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">National Center for Health Research</span> Organization

The National Center for Health Research is a Washington, D.C.-based non-profit organization founded in 1999. NCHR provides health-related services such as free information and training based on research findings; educating policy makers and working with the media. The President of the organisation is Diana Zuckerman. The primary program is The Cancer Prevention and Treatment Fund, which utilises an online health hotline.

The community health center (CHC) in the United States is the dominant model for providing integrated primary care and public health services for the low-income and uninsured, and represents one use of federal grant funding as part of the country's health care safety net. The health care safety net can be defined as a group of health centers, hospitals, and providers willing to provide services to the nation's uninsured and underserved population, thus ensuring that comprehensive care is available to all, regardless of income or insurance status. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 29 million people in the country were uninsured in 2015. Many more Americans lack adequate coverage or access to health care. These groups are sometimes called "underinsured". CHCs represent one method of accessing or receiving health and medical care for both underinsured and uninsured communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Homelessness and mental health</span>

In a study in Western societies, homeless people have a higher prevalence of mental illness when compared to the general population. They also are more likely to suffer from alcoholism and drug dependency. It is estimated that 20–25% of homeless people, compared with 6% of the non-homeless, have severe mental illness. Others estimate that up to one-third of the homeless have a mental illness. In January 2015, the most extensive survey ever undertaken found 564,708 people were homeless on a given night in the United States. Depending on the age group in question and how homelessness is defined, the consensus estimate as of 2014 was that, at minimum, 25% of the American homeless—140,000 individuals—were seriously mentally ill at any given point in time. 45% percent of the homeless—250,000 individuals—had any mental illness. More would be labeled homeless if these were annual counts rather than point-in-time counts. Being chronically homeless also means that people with mental illnesses are more likely to experience catastrophic health crises requiring medical intervention or resulting in institutionalization within the criminal justice system. Majority of the homeless population do not have a mental illness. Although there is no correlation between homelessness and mental health, those who are dealing with homelessness are struggling with psychological and emotional distress. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration conducted a study and found that in 2010, 26.2 percent of sheltered homeless people had a severe mental illness.

Health policy and management is the field relating to leadership, management, and administration of public health systems, health care systems, hospitals, and hospital networks. Health care administrators are considered health care professionals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mental Health Act 1959</span> United Kingdom legislation

The Mental Health Act 1959 was an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom concerning England and Wales which had, as its main objectives, to abolish the distinction between psychiatric hospitals and other types of hospitals and to deinstituitionalise mental health patients and see them treated more by community care.

The United States has experienced two waves of deinstitutionalization, the process of replacing long-stay psychiatric hospitals with less isolated community mental health services for those diagnosed with a mental disorder or developmental disability.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">21st Century Cures Act</span> Bill enacted by the 114th United States Congress

The 21st Century Cures Act is a United States law enacted by the 114th United States Congress in December 2016 and then signed into law on December 13, 2016. It authorized $6.3 billion in funding, mostly for the National Institutes of Health. The act was supported especially by large pharmaceutical manufacturers and was opposed especially by some consumer organizations.

Beverly Benson Long was an American activist from Athens, Georgia. She was particularly invested in the fight to desegregate Georgia's public schools between 1958 and 1961. Later, she became an advocate for those with mental illnesses.

References

  1. Ford, Matt (June 8, 2015). "Cook County Jail, America's Largest Mental Hospital is a Jail". The Atlantic. Retrieved September 13, 2015.
  2. Goldman, Howard H.; Morrissey, Joseph P.; Ridgely, M. Susan; Frank, Richard G.; Newman, Sandra J.; Kennedy, Cille (January 1992). "Lessons from the Program on Chronic Mental Illness". Health Affairs. 11 (3): 51–68. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.11.3.51. PMID   1398453.
  3. PARDES, Herbert. The demise of a major innovation: Carter's 1980 Community Mental Health Systems Act in Reagan's hands. Mental health care delivery: Innovations, impediments, and implementation, p. 189-203, 1990.
  4. Grob GN. From Asylum to Community: Mental Health Policy in Modern America. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1991.
  5. id
  6. Langsley, Donald G. (December 1980). "The Community Mental Health Center: Does It Treat Patients?". Psychiatric Services. 31 (12): 815–819. doi:10.1176/ps.31.12.815. PMID   7203401.
  7. Fink, Paul J.; Weinstein, Stephen P. (April 1979). "Whatever Happened to Psychiatry? The Deprofessionalization of Community Mental Health Centers". American Journal of Psychiatry. 136 (4A): 406–409. doi:10.1176/ajp.1979.136.4a.406.
  8. Thomas, Alexander (1998). "Ronald Reagan and the Commitment of the Mentally Ill: Capital, Interest Groups, and the Eclipse of Social Policy". Electronic Journal of Sociology. 3 (4).[ dead link ]
  9. 4 Treatise on Health Care Law § 20.09 (2024)
  10. Mental Health Systems Act, Pub. L. No. 96-398, 94 Stat. 1564 (1980), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/STATUTE-94/STATUTE-94-Pg1564.
  11. Mental Health Systems Act, Pub. L. No. 96-398, 94 Stat. 1564 (1980), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/STATUTE-94/STATUTE-94-Pg1564.
  12. id
  13. id
  14. Grob, Gerald N. (September 2005). "Public Policy and Mental Illnesses: Jimmy Carter's Presidential Commission on Mental Health". The Milbank Quarterly. 83 (3): 425–456. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00408.x. PMC   2690151 . PMID   16201999.
  15. See, U.S. Congress. House. Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1979. Hearings on the Mental Health Systems Act.
  16. See also, U.S. Congress. Senate. Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Committee on Labor and Human Resources. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1979. Hearings on the Mental Health Systems Act, February 7, 1979
  17. Lyon-Levine, Martha; Levine, Martin; Zusman, Jack (March 1985). "Developments in Patients' Bill of Rights Since the Mental Health Systems Act" (PDF). Mental and Physical Disability Law Reporter. 9 (2). Retrieved September 13, 2015.
  18. Grob, Gerald N. (September 2005). "Public Policy and Mental Illnesses: Jimmy Carter's Presidential Commission on Mental Health". The Milbank Quarterly. 83 (3): 425–456. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00408.x. PMC   2690151 . PMID   16201999.
  19. See Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1981, Pub. L. No. 97-35, 95 Stat. 357,187–96 (1981) https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-10576/pdf/COMPS-10576.pdf
  20. Grob, Gerald N. (September 2005). "Public Policy and Mental Illnesses: Jimmy Carter's Presidential Commission on Mental Health". The Milbank Quarterly. 83 (3): 425–456. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00408.x. PMC   2690151 . PMID   16201999.
  21. id
  22. Public Law 97-35. U.S. Statutes at Large. 1981;95:535–98
  23. Osher, Fred (May 9, 2016). "We Need Better Funding for Mental Health Services". The New York Times.

Further reading