Panama as a tax haven

Last updated

The Republic of Panama is one of the oldest and best-known tax havens in the Caribbean, as well as one of the most established in the region. [1] Panama has had a reputation for tax avoidance since the early 20th century, and Panama has been cited repeatedly in recent years as a jurisdiction which does not cooperate with international tax transparency initiatives.

Contents

Panama's offshore sector is intimately tied to the Panama Canal, which has made it a gateway and entrepôt for international trade. [2] There are strong similarities between Panama and other leading tax havens like Hong Kong, Singapore and Dubai. On paper at least, Panama has the largest shipping fleet in the world, greater than those of the US and China combined, according to the Tax Justice Network.

Background (1910s–1970s)

Construction work on the Gaillard Cut of the Panama Canal, 1907 Panama Canal under construction, 1907.jpg
Construction work on the Gaillard Cut of the Panama Canal, 1907

A 2014 investigation by journalist Ken Silverstein published in Vice Magazine explains how Panama came into being, with US help:

In 1903, the administration of Theodore Roosevelt created the country after bullying Colombia to hand over what was then the province of Panama. Roosevelt acted at the behest of various banking groups, among them J. P. Morgan & Co., which was appointed as the country's official "fiscal agent". [3]

The Roosevelt administration sought to foment armed rebellion by Panamanian nationalists, [4] forcing Panama away from a politically fragile Colombia. Roosevelt achieved this goal with the help of William Nelson Cromwell, a well-connected US Republican lawyer and also legal counsel for JP Morgan's railroad interests. The administration's key objective was allegedly to install a pro-US Panamanian government that would secure US rights over the Panama Canal. [5] The Hay–Bunau-Varilla Treaty resulted, establishing permanent U.S. rights to a Panama Canal Zone several miles wide, across the neck of the isthmus. Panama became independent from Colombia the same month, and the Panama Canal opened in 1914. [6]

According to a 2013 academic study published by the Norwegian Center for Taxation, Panama's reputation as a tax haven began in the year 1919, when it began registering foreign ships in order to help Standard Oil avoid US taxes and regulations; other US ship owners followed, some seeking to avoid the higher wages and better working conditions imposed by US legislation such as the Seaman's Act and safety standards for sea vessels. [7] Also, during the Prohibition era, US passenger ships were allowed to serve alcohol to their customers without breaking the law if they had Panamanian registration. [8]

Within a few years, Panama extended its minimalist approach to taxation, regulation and financial disclosure requirements to the world of offshore finance. According to the study, "Wall Street interests helped Panama introduce lax company incorporation laws, which let anyone start tax-free, anonymous corporations, with few questions asked". [8]

Background (1970s–present)

For decades, offshore finance had a relatively modest profile in Panama, but it took off in the 1970s as world oil prices surged. During this time, the Republic of Panama passed legislation "entrenching corporate and individual financial secrecy". [9]

By 1982, partly attracted by business opportunities deriving from the Panama Canal and its free trade zone, more than 100 international banks had offices in Panama City. [9]

According to Investopedia : "Panama's offshore jurisdiction offers a wide array of excellent financial services, including offshore banking, the incorporation of offshore companies, registration of ships and the formation of Panama trusts and foundations." [1] In Panama, no taxes are imposed on offshore companies which engage in business solely outside of the jurisdiction; therefore, the companies which are incorporated in the Republic of Panama and the owners of these companies are exempt from corporate taxes, withholding taxes, capital gains tax, local taxes, estate taxes and inheritance tax. However, businesses within Panama itself are permitted to conduct business there so long as the company pays its local taxes. [1]

Panama has been cited repeatedly in recent years by the State Department of the United States and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) as a jurisdiction which does not cooperate with international tax transparency initiatives due to the legislation which regulates the country's offshore jurisdiction and financial services. [10] Panama has over 350,000 international business companies (IBCs) registered, the third largest number in the world after Hong Kong and the Virgin Islands. Alongside incorporation of IBCs, Panama is active in forming tax-evading foundations and trusts, insurance, and boat and shipping registration, according to the Tax Justice Network. [2]

Financial privacy

Countries with politicians, public officials or close associates implicated in the Panama Papers leak on April 15, 2016 Countries implicated in the Panama Papers.svg
Countries with politicians, public officials or close associates implicated in the Panama Papers leak on April 15, 2016

An extensive amount of legislation currently exists in the Republic of Panama to protect corporate and financial privacy. However, organisations such as the Tax Justice Network and other advocacy groups and non-governmental organisations state that the main intention of these laws is financial secrecy, as opposed to privacy. [11] [12]

The names of shareholders of Panamanian corporations, trusts and foundations are still not required by law to be publicly registered. Panama has no exchange controls: this means that for individual clients of Panama's offshore banking, as well as for offshore business entities incorporated in Panama, there are no limits or reporting requirements on money transfers into or out of the country. [1] [9]

Panama also has very strict banking secrecy laws: for example, it is forbidden for Panamanian banks to share any information about offshore bank accounts or account holders, except under special circumstances instigated by the Panamanian authorities. Such regulation has made it difficult to investigate the true extent of the Panama Papers leak, as severe criminal penalties are enacted to individuals who breach confidentiality. [1] [9]

Despite this, Panama does not appear on the Tax Justice Network's top ten list for financial secrecy, [13] with Alex Cobham of Tax Justice Network saying "There is a double standard: many developed countries host or support jurisdictions where there is an absence of financial transparency". [14]

Accusations

Mossack Fonseca headquarters. Mossack Fonseca HQ.JPG
Mossack Fonseca headquarters.

Pascal Saint Amans, Director of the Centre for Tax Policy and Administration in the OECD [15] said: "From the standpoint of reputation, Panama is still the only place where people still believe they can hide their money." [9] [2] Writing for VICE News, Ken Silverstein explained the Mossack Fonseca history in the region: "These laws attracted a long line of 'dirtbags' and dictators who used Panama to hide their stolen loot, including Ferdinand Marcos, 'Baby Doc' Duvalier, and Augusto Pinochet. When Manuel Noriega, commander of the Panama Defence Forces, took power in Panama in 1983, Silverstein said, Noriega essentially nationalised the money-laundering business; he partnered with the Medellin drug cartel and gave it free rein to operate in the country." [9] [3]

In the United Kingdom, Private Eye used data collected from the Land Registry to create "an easily searchable online map ... of properties in England and Wales owned by offshore companies. It reveals for the first time the extent of the British property interests held by companies based in tax havens." Most of these properties are tax avoidance vehicles and in some cases also to conceal wealth of dubious origin." [16]

A 2003 examination of tax havens by Jeffrey Robinson quotes a US Customs official as saying:

[Panama] is filled with dishonest lawyers, dishonest bankers, dishonest company formation agents and dishonest companies registered there by those dishonest lawyers so that they can deposit dirty money into their dishonest banks. The Free Trade Zone is the black hole through which Panama has become one of the filthiest money laundering sinks in the world. [17] [2] [18]

Tax Justice Network

The advocacy group the Tax Justice Network has described Panama as "the recipient of drugs money from Latin America, plus ample other sources of dirty money from the US and elsewhere". [17] It said "now is a good moment to draw attention to how Panama developed as a secrecy jurisdiction and how it continues to provide full service – wash, rinse and dry – to crooks and money launderers from around the world." [17] [19]

Response

Ramón Fonseca Mora, the co-founder of Mossack Fonseca, told the New York Times : "I assure you there is more dirty money in New York, Miami and London than there is in Panama". [14] The United States is an alleged tax haven despite the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act. [20] The US has refused the Common Reporting Standard set up by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. [21] This means the US receives tax and asset information for American assets and income abroad, but does not share information about what happens in the United States with other countries; in other words, the US has become attractive as a tax haven. [22]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offshore bank</span> Bank located outside the country of residence of the depositor

An offshore bank is a bank that is operated and regulated under international banking license, which usually prohibits the bank from establishing any business activities in the jurisdiction of establishment. Due to less regulation and transparency, accounts with offshore banks were often used to hide undeclared income. Since the 1980s, jurisdictions that provide financial services to nonresidents on a big scale can be referred to as offshore financial centres. OFCs often also levy little or no corporation tax and/or personal income and high direct taxes such as duty, making the cost of living high.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shell corporation</span> Company with few, if any, actual assets or operations

A shell corporation is a company or corporation with no significant assets or operations often formed to obtain financing before beginning business. Shell companies were primarily vehicles for lawfully hiding the identity of their beneficial owners, and this is still the defining feature of shell companies due to the loopholes in the global corporate transparency initiatives. It may hold passive investments or be the registered owner of assets, such as intellectual property, or ships. Shell companies may be registered to the address of a company that provides a service setting up shell companies, and which may act as the agent for receipt of legal correspondence. The company may serve as a vehicle for business transactions without itself having any significant assets or operations.

Offshore investment is the keeping of money in a jurisdiction other than one's country of residence. Offshore jurisdictions are used to pay less tax in many countries by large and small-scale investors. Poorly regulated offshore domiciles have served historically as havens for tax evasion, money laundering, or to conceal or protect illegally acquired money from law enforcement in the investor's country. However, the modern, well-regulated offshore centres allow legitimate investors to take advantage of higher rates of return or lower rates of tax on that return offered by operating via such domiciles. The advantage to offshore investment is that such operations are both legal and less costly than those offered in the investor's country—or "onshore".

The Center for Freedom and Prosperity is an American nonprofit organization that advocates for flat taxes, territorial taxation systems, and offshore tax havens. The organization and its subsidiary, Center for Freedom and Prosperity Foundation, publish studies and conduct seminars analyzing the benefits of jurisdictional tax competition, financial privacy and fiscal sovereignty.

A tax haven is a term, often used pejoratively, to describe a place with very low tax rates for non-domiciled investors, even if the official rates may be higher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Canada</span> Institutional corruption in the country of Canada

Corruption is an increasing issue across Canada. On Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, Canada scored 76 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Canada ranked 12th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, Canada's score of 76 was the highest score among the countries of the Americas. Regionally, the average score was 43 and the lowest score was 13.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Offshore financial centre</span> Corporate-focused tax havens

An offshore financial centre (OFC) is defined as a "country or jurisdiction that provides financial services to nonresidents on a scale that is incommensurate with the size and the financing of its domestic economy."

The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, Inc. (ICIJ), is an independent global network of 280 investigative journalists and over 140 media organizations spanning more than 100 countries. It is based in Washington, D.C., with personnel in Australia, France, Spain, Hungary, Serbia, Belgium and Ireland.

The Financial Secrecy Index (FSI) is a report published by the advocacy organization Tax Justice Network (TJN) which ranks countries by financial secrecy indicators, weighted by the economic flows of each country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mossack Fonseca</span> 1977–2018 Panamanian law firm and corporate service provider

Mossack Fonseca & Co. was a Panamanian law firm and corporate service provider. At one time it was the world's fourth-largest provider of offshore financial services. From its establishment in 1977 until the publication of the Panama Papers in April 2016, the company remained mostly obscured from public attention, even though it was a major firm in the global offshore industry and acted for approximately 300,000 companies. Prior to its dissolution, the company employed roughly 600 staff members spread across 42 countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panama Papers</span> 2016 document leak scandal

The Panama Papers are 11.5 million leaked documents that were published beginning on April 3, 2016. The papers detail financial and attorney–client information for more than 214,488 offshore entities. The documents, some dating back to the 1970s, were created by, and taken from, former Panamanian offshore law firm and corporate service provider Mossack Fonseca, and compiled with similar leaks into a searchable database.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jürgen Mossack</span> German-Panamanian tax lawyer

Jürgen Rolf Dieter Mossack is a German-born Panamanian lawyer and the co-founder of Mossack Fonseca, a former law firm headquartered in Panama City which had more than 40 offices worldwide. The firm gained global notoriety in 2016 when it found itself at the centre of the Panama Papers affair, which uncovered the activities of the offshore finance industry. According to the leaked papers, Mossack Fonseca set up more than 214,000 shell companies around the world, some of which were found to have been used for illegal purposes, including fraud and tax evasion. In 2016, Mossack Fonseca was raided by police on suspicion of money-laundering, bribery and corruption. Mossack and his partner Ramón Fonseca Mora were arrested and jailed on 10 February 2017. They were initially refused bail because the court saw a flight risk, but were released on 21 April 2017 after a judge ruled they had cooperated with the investigation and ordered them each to pay $500,000 in bail. Numerous lawsuits including serious allegations of collusion with despotic regimes, mafia, and global criminals are ongoing.

This article lists some of the reactions and responses from countries and other official bodies regarding the leak of legal documents related to offshore tax havens from the law firm Mossack Fonseca, called the Panama Papers.

In 2010, the United States implemented the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act; the law required financial firms around the world to report accounts held by US citizens to the Internal Revenue Service. The US on the other hand refused the Common Reporting Standard set up by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, alongside Vanuatu and Bahrain.

OjoPúblico is a Peruvian investigative journalism website founded in 2014 by journalists Oscar Castilla Contreras, Nelly Luna Amancio, David Hidalgo and Fabiola Torres, as well as the programmer Antonio Cucho. It investigates issues concerning human rights, corruption, drug trafficking, environment, health and transparency, among others.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panama Papers (South America)</span>

The Panama Papers are 11.5 million leaked documents that detail financial and attorney-client information for more than 214,488 offshore entities. The documents, some dating back to the 1970s, were created by and taken from, Panamanian law firm and corporate service provider Mossack Fonseca, and were leaked in 2015 by an anonymous source.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panama Papers (Europe)</span>

The Panama Papers are 11.5 million leaked documents that detail financial and attorney–client information for more than 214,488 offshore entities. The documents, some dating back to the 1970s, were created by, and taken from, Panamanian law firm and corporate service provider Mossack Fonseca, and were leaked in 2015 by an anonymous source.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panama Papers (Asia)</span> Documents leaked in 2015

The Panama Papers are 11.5 million leaked documents that detail financial and attorney–client information for more than 214,488 offshore entities. The documents, some dating back to the 1970s, were created by, and taken from, Panamanian law firm and corporate service provider Mossack Fonseca, and were leaked in 2015 by an anonymous source.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panama Papers (North America)</span> Details from the Panama Papers concerning North America

The Panama Papers are 11.5 million leaked documents that detail financial and attorney–client information for more than 214,488 offshore entities. The files were uncovered and exposed by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, the German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung and other news organizations. The documents, some dating back to the 1970s, were created by, and taken from, Panamanian law firm and corporate service provider Mossack Fonseca, and were leaked in 2015 by an anonymous source.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Panama Papers (Africa)</span>

The Panama Papers are 11.5 million leaked documents that detail financial and attorney–client information for more than 214,488 offshore entities. The documents, some dating back to the 1970s, were created by, and taken from, Panamanian law firm and corporate service provider Mossack Fonseca, and were leaked in 2015 by an anonymous source.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Maverick, J. B. (September 30, 2015). "Why Is Panama Considered a Tax Haven?". Investopedia. Retrieved May 5, 2016.
  2. 1 2 3 4 "Panama: the making of a tax haven and rogue state". Tax Justice Network. March 30, 2016. Retrieved April 7, 2016.
  3. 1 2 Silverstein, Ken (December 3, 2014). "The Law Firm That Works with Oligarchs, Money Launderers, and Dictators". VICE.
  4. ↑ "Panama declares independence from Colombia". History .
  5. ↑ Ovidio Diaz-Espino (1 August 2014). How Wall Street Created a Nation: J.P. Morgan, Teddy Roosevelt, and the Panama Canal. Primedia E-launch LLC. p. 120. ISBN   978-0-9905521-2-3.
  6. ↑ "Milestones: 1977–1980 - Office of the Historian". history.state.gov.
  7. ↑ Guttorm Schjelderup; Armando Pires (April 12, 2016). "How Panama Became a Tax Haven". Foreign Affairs . Archived from the original on August 13, 2016. Retrieved July 3, 2016– via nnh.no.
  8. 1 2 Armando Jose Garcia Pires. "31/13 Working Paper: The business model of The British Virgin Islands and Panama" (PDF). Institute for Research in Economics and Business Administration.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Panama Papers: How did Panama become a tax haven?". BBC News.
  10. ↑ Panama as a jurisdiction which does not cooperate with international tax transparency initiatives:
  11. ↑ "The Panama Papers: the enablers of financial secrecy know what they are doing". Tax Justice Network. April 4, 2016.
  12. ↑ "Financial Secrecy in Panama and Beyond". The New York Times. April 8, 2016.
  13. ↑ "View 2015 Results". Financial Secrecy Index. Tax Justice Network. Archived from the original on 2015-12-08.
  14. 1 2 Seitz, Max. "Why the top 10 tax havens don't include Panama". BBC Mundo.
  15. ↑ "Pascal Saint-Amans – Director, Centre for Tax Policy and Administration". www.oecd.org.
  16. ↑ "In the Back". Private Eye. Retrieved May 6, 2016.
  17. 1 2 3 Lashmar, Paul (April 3, 2016). "Panama Papers: remarkable global media operation holds rich and powerful to account". The Conversation. Retrieved April 7, 2016.
  18. ↑ Robinson, Jeffrey (2003). The Sink: Terror, Crime and Dirty Money in the Offshore World. Constable. p. 63. ISBN   9781841196824.
  19. ↑ Lashmar, Paul (April 4, 2016). "Panama Papers: Who was behind the investigation into elite's tax havens?". Newsweek. Retrieved April 7, 2016.
  20. ↑ Wood, Robert W. (November 3, 2015). "U.S. Ranks As Top Tax Haven, Refusing To Share Tax Data Despite FATCA". Forbes.
  21. ↑ Swanson, Ana (April 5, 2016). "How the U.S. became one of the world's biggest tax havens". Washington Post. Retrieved April 23, 2016.
  22. ↑ Drucker, Jesse (January 27, 2016). "The World's Favorite New Tax Haven Is the United States". Bloomberg Businessweek. Retrieved April 23, 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.