Polymer adsorption

Last updated

Adsorption is the adhesion of ions or molecules onto the surface of another phase. [1] Adsorption may occur via physisorption and chemisorption. Ions and molecules can adsorb to many types of surfaces including polymer surfaces. A polymer is a large molecule composed of repeating subunits bound together by covalent bonds. In dilute solution, polymers form globule structures. When a polymer adsorbs to a surface that it interacts favorably with, the globule is essentially squashed, and the polymer has a pancake structure. [2]

Contents

Polymer versus non-polymer surfaces

Polymer surfaces differ from non-polymer surfaces in that the subunits that make up the surface are covalently bonded to one another. Non-polymer surfaces can be bound by ionic bonds, metallic bonds or intermolecular forces (IMFs). In a two component system, non-polymer surfaces form when a positive net amount of energy is required to break self-interactions and form non-self-interactions. Therefore, the energy of mixing (ΔmixG) is positive. This amount of energy, as described by interfacial tension, varies for different combinations of materials. However, with polymer surfaces, the subunits are covalently bonded together and the bulk phase of the solid surface does not allow for surface tension to be measured directly. [3] The intermolecular forces between the large polymer molecules are difficult to calculate and cannot be determined as easily as non-polymer surface molecular interactions. [3] The covalently bonded subunits form a surface with differing properties as compared to non-polymer surfaces. Some examples of polymer surfaces include: polyvinyl chloride (PVC), nylon, polyethylene (PE), and polypropylene (PP). Polymer surfaces have been analyzed using a variety of techniques, including: scanning electron microscopy, scanning tunneling microscopy, and infrared spectroscopy. [3]

Adsorption isotherms

The adsorption process can be characterized by determining what amount of the ions or molecules are adsorbed to the surface. This amount can be determined experimentally by the construction of an adsorption isotherm. An adsorption isotherm is a graph of Γ(P,T) versus partial pressure of the adsorbate(P/P0) for a given constant temperature, where Γ(P,T) is the number of molecules adsorbed per surface area. [1] As the partial pressure of the adsorbate increases, the number of molecules per area also increases.

Contact angle and surface tension

Contact angle, the angle at which a liquid droplet meets at a solid surface, is another way to characterize polymer surfaces. Contact angle (θ) is a measure of the wetting ability of the liquid on a solid surface. [4] Generally, due to low surface energy, liquids will not wet polymer surfaces and the contact angle will be greater than 90°. [3] The liquid molecules are more attracted to other liquid molecules as compared to the polymer surface. Because the polymer surfaces are solid surfaces, surface tension cannot be measured in a traditional way such as using a Wilhelmy plate. Instead, contact angles can be used to indirectly estimate the surface tension of polymer surfaces. [3] This is accomplished by measuring the contact angles of a series of liquids on a polymer surface. A Fox and Zisman plot of cos θ versus surface tensions of the liquids(γL) gives a straight line which can be extrapolated back to determine the critical surface tension of the solid (γc). [3]

Where:

is the contact angle
is the surface tension of the liquid
is the critical surface tension of the solid

The variable β was previously determined to be approximately 0.03 to 0.04. [3] While the actual surface tension of the solid polymer surface cannot be determined, the Fox and Zisman plot serves as an estimate. However, this estimate may be skewed if there are significant intermolecular forces between the surface and the liquid. Also, this plot is not applicable for binary mixtures of liquids dropped onto a polymer surface. Some estimated surface tensions of different polymers and the contact angles of different liquids on polymer surfaces is shown below. [5] [6]

Polymerγc (mN/m)
Polystyrene (PS)40.7 [5]
Polyvinylacetate (PVA)36.5 [5]
Teflon20 [5]
Polymethylacrylic acid (PMAA)41 [5]
Polypropylene33 [6]
Silicone24 [6]
Polyimide40 [6]
Nylon 6/641 [6]
Polyacrylamide56 [7]

Adsorption and charge relationship

The structure of sodium polystyrene sulfonate is shown. When this salt is dissolved in a solvent, the negatively charged side group can adsorb positively charged adsorbates. Sodium-Polystyrolsulfonate.png
The structure of sodium polystyrene sulfonate is shown. When this salt is dissolved in a solvent, the negatively charged side group can adsorb positively charged adsorbates.
The structure of poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), polyDADMAC, is shown. When the salt is dissolved in a solvent, the positively charged side group can adsorb negatively charged adsorbates. 1114.png
The structure of poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), polyDADMAC, is shown. When the salt is dissolved in a solvent, the positively charged side group can adsorb negatively charged adsorbates.

Different polymer surfaces have different side chains on their monomers that can become charged due to the adsorption or dissociation of adsorbates. For example, polystyrene sulfonate has monomers containing negatively charged side chains which can adsorb positively charged adsorbates. Polystyrene sulfonate will adsorb more positively charged adsorbate than negatively charged. Conversely, for a polymer that contains positively charged side chains, such as poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride), negatively charged adsorbates will be strongly attracted.

Thermodynamics of polymer surfaces

Contact angle

Because the ability of a surface to adsorb molecules onto its surface depends on energies of interaction, thermodynamics of adsorption can be used to understand the driving forces for adsorption. To measure the thermodynamics of polymer surfaces, contact angles are often used to easily obtain useful information. The thermodynamic description of contact angles of a drop of liquid on a solid surface are derived from the equilibrium formed between the chemical potentials of the solid–liquid, solid–vapor, and liquid–vapor interfaces.

A contact angle of a liquid sample Contact angle.svg
A contact angle of a liquid sample

At equilibrium, the contact angle of a liquid drop on a surface does not change. Therefore, the Gibbs free energy is equal to 0:

The chemical potentials of the three interfaces must cancel out, producing Young's equation for the relationship between surface energies and contact angles: [8]

where:

is the surface tension of the liquid
is the contact angle of the liquid
is the surface tension of the solid–vapor interface
is the surface tension of the solid–liquid interface
is the vapor pressure of the liquid at equilibrium.

However, this equation cannot be used to determine the surface energy of a solid surface by itself. It can be used in conjunction with the following equation to determine the relationship between contact angle and surface energy of the solid, as surface tension ≈ surface energy for a solid: [1]

where

is the surface energy of the solid
is the surface tension of the liquid.
and are the dispersive and polar components of the surface energy of the solid

Using these two equations, the surface energy of a solid can be determined simply by measuring the contact angle of two different liquids of known surface tension on that solid's surface. [8]

Copolymers

For heterogeneous surfaces (consisting of two or more different types of material), the contact angle of a drop of liquid at each point along the three phase contact line with a solid surface is a result of the surface tension of the surface at that point. For example, if the heterogeneous regions of the surface form very large domains, and the drop exists entirely within a homogeneous domain, then it will have a contact angle corresponding to the surface tension of that homogeneous region.

With large enough homogeneous domains, the observed contact angle may correspond entirely to a single component of a surface. Jensenpic4.jpg
With large enough homogeneous domains, the observed contact angle may correspond entirely to a single component of a surface.

Likewise, a drop that straddles two domains of differing surface tensions will have different contact angles along the three phase contact line corresponding to the different surface tensions at each point.

if the surface energies of the two phases are different, this drop will show two distinct contact angles- one in the top phase and another in the bottom phase. Jensenpic5.jpg
if the surface energies of the two phases are different, this drop will show two distinct contact angles- one in the top phase and another in the bottom phase.

However, with sufficiently small domains (such as in those of a block copolymer), the observed surface energy of the surface approaches the weighted average of the surface energies of each of the constituents of the surface: [8]

where:

is the overall surface energy of the polymer
is the fraction of the ith component of the polymer's surface
is the surface energy of the ith component

This occurs because as the size of the homogeneous domains become very small compared to the size of the drop, the differences in contact angles along different homogeneous regions becomes indistinguishable from the average of the contact angles. [8]

When the size of domains becomes small enough, it becomes hard to distinguish one area from another, causing surface properties to manifest as a weighted average of area fraction Polyimage3.jpg
When the size of domains becomes small enough, it becomes hard to distinguish one area from another, causing surface properties to manifest as a weighted average of area fraction

The observed contact angle is given by the following formula: [8]

where:

is the fraction of ith component
is the contact angle ith component

If the polymer is made out of only two different monomers, it is possible use the above equation to determine the composition of the polymer simply by measuring the contact angle of a drop of liquid placed on it: [8] [9]

where:

is the observed contact angle
f is the area fraction of one component, and the area fraction of the other.
and are the contact angles of the first and second components of the polymer.

Surface Coverage

One of the defining features of polymer surfaces and coatings is the chemical regularity of the surface. While many materials can be irregular mixtures of different components, polymer surfaces tend to be chemically uniform, with the same distribution of different functional groups across all areas of the surface. Because of this, adsorption of molecules onto polymer surfaces can be easily modeled by the Langmuir or Frumkin Isotherms. The Langmuir equation states that for the adsorption of a molecule of adsorbate A onto a surface binding site S, a single binding site is used, and each free binding site is equally likely to accept a molecule of adsorbate: [1]

where:

A is the adsorbate
S is the surface binding site
is the bound adsorbate/binding site pair

The equilibrium constant for this reaction is then defined as: [1]

The equilibrium constant is related to the equilibrium surface coverage θ, which is given by: [1]

where:

'θ is the surface coverage (fraction, 0 is empty, 1 is fully covered)
is the adsorption equilibrium constant

Adsorption energy

Because many polymers are composed of primarily of hydrocarbon chains with at most slightly polar functional groups, they tend to have low surface energies and thus adsorb rather poorly. While this can be advantageous for some applications, modification of polymer surfaces is crucial for many other applications in which adhering a substrate to its surface is vital for optimal performance. For example, many applications utilize polymers as structural components, but which degrade rapidly when exposed to weather or other sources of wear. [10] Therefore, coatings must be used which protect the structural layer from damage. However, the poor adhesive properties of nonpolar polymers makes it difficult to adsorb the protective coating onto its surface. These types of problems make the measurement and control of surface energies important to development of useful technologies.

The Gibbs energy of adsorption, , can be determined from the adsorption equilibrium constant: [1]

Because is negative for a spontaneous process and positive for a nonspontaneous process, it can be used to understand the tendency for different compounds to adsorb to a surface. In addition, it can be divided into a combination of two components: [1]

which are the Gibbs energies of physisorption and chemisorption, respectively. Many polymer applications, such as those which use polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, or Teflon) require the use of a surface with specific physisorption properties toward one type of material, while being firmly adhered in place to a different type of material. Because the physisorption energy is so low for these types of materials, chemisorption is used to form covalent bonds between the polymer coating and the surface of the object (such as a pan) which holds it in place. Because the relative magnitudes of chemisorption processes are generally much greater than magnitudes of physisorption processes, this forms a strong bond between the polymer and the surface it is chemically adhered to, while allowing the polymer to retain its physisorption characteristics toward other materials. [10]

Experimentally, the enthalpy and entropy of adsorption are often used to fine-tune the adsorption properties of a material. The enthalpy of adsorption can be determined from constant pressure calorimetry: [1]

where:

is the heat exchanged,
is the integral molar enthalpy of adsorption,
is the number of moles adsorbed.

From the enthalpy of adsorption, the entropy of adsorption can be calculated:

where:

is the integral molar entropy of adsorption,
is the temperature in kelvins.

Together, these are used to understand the driving forces behind adsorption processes.

Applications

Implant Coatings

Protein-resistant coatings

Protein adsorption influences the interactions that occur at the tissue-implant interface. Protein adsorption can lead to blood clots, the foreign-body response and ultimately the degradation of the device. In order to counter-act the effects of protein adsorption, implants are often coated with a polymer coating to decrease protein adsorption.

Polyethylene glycol (PEG) coatings have been shown to minimize protein adsorption in the body. The PEG coating consists of hydrophilic molecules that are repulsive to protein adsorption. [11] Proteins consist of hydrophobic molecules and charge sites that want to bind to other hydrophobic molecules and oppositely charged sites. [12] By applying a thin monolayer coating of PEG, protein adsorption is prevented at the device site. Furthermore, the device's resistance to protein adsorption, fibroblast adhesion and bacteria adhesion are increased. [13]

Antithrombogenic coatings

The hemocompatability of a medical device is dependent upon surface charge, energy and topography. [14] Devices that fail to be hemocompatabile run the risk of forming a thrombus, proliferation and compromising the immune system. Polymer coatings are applied to devices to increase their hemocompatability. Chemical cascades lead to the formation of fibrous clots. By choosing to use hydrophilic polymer coatings, protein adsorption decreases and the chance of negative interactions with the blood diminishes as well. One such polymer coating that increases hemocompatability is heparin. Heparin is a polymer coating that interacts with thrombin to prevent coagulation. Heparin has been shown to suppress platelet adhesion, complement activation and protein adsorption. [13]

Structural

Advanced polymer composites

Advanced polymer composites are used in the strengthening and rehabilitation of old structures. These advanced composites can be made using many different methods including prepreg, resin, infusion, filament winding and pultrusion. Advanced polymer composites are used in many airplane structures and their largest market is in aerospace and defense.

Fiber reinforced polymers

Fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) are commonly used by civil engineers in their structures. FRPs respond linear-elastically to axial stress, making them a great material to hold a load. FRPs are usually in a laminate formation with each lamina having unidirectional fibers, typically carbon or glass, embedded within a layer of light polymer matrix material. FRPs have great resistance against environmental exposure and great durability.

Polytetrafluoroethylene

Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) is a polymer used in many applications including non-stick coatings, beauty products, and lubricants. PTFE is a hydrophobic molecule composed of carbon and fluorine. Carbon-fluorine bonds cause PTFE to be a low-friction material, conducive in high temperature environments and resistant to stress cracking. [15] These properties cause PTFE to be non-reactive and used in a wide array of applications.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hydrophobe</span> Molecule or surface that has no attraction to water

In chemistry, hydrophobicity is the physical property of a molecule that is seemingly repelled from a mass of water. In contrast, hydrophiles are attracted to water.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface tension</span> Tendency of a liquid surface to shrink to reduce surface area

Surface tension is the tendency of liquid surfaces at rest to shrink into the minimum surface area possible. Surface tension is what allows objects with a higher density than water such as razor blades and insects to float on a water surface without becoming even partly submerged.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Adsorption</span> Phenomenon of surface adhesion

Adsorption is the adhesion of atoms, ions or molecules from a gas, liquid or dissolved solid to a surface. This process creates a film of the adsorbate on the surface of the adsorbent. This process differs from absorption, in which a fluid is dissolved by or permeates a liquid or solid. While adsorption does often precede absorption, which involves the transfer of the absorbate into the volume of the absorbent material, alternatively, adsorption is distinctly a surface phenomenon, wherein the adsorbate does not penetrate through the material surface and into the bulk of the adsorbent. The term sorption encompasses both adsorption and absorption, and desorption is the reverse of sorption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surface energy</span> Excess energy at the surface of a material relative to its interior

In surface science, surface energy quantifies the disruption of intermolecular bonds that occurs when a surface is created. In solid-state physics, surfaces must be intrinsically less energetically favorable than the bulk of the material, otherwise there would be a driving force for surfaces to be created, removing the bulk of the material. The surface energy may therefore be defined as the excess energy at the surface of a material compared to the bulk, or it is the work required to build an area of a particular surface. Another way to view the surface energy is to relate it to the work required to cut a bulk sample, creating two surfaces. There is "excess energy" as a result of the now-incomplete, unrealized bonding between the two created surfaces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wetting</span> Ability of a liquid to maintain contact with a solid surface

Wetting is the ability of a liquid to maintain contact with a solid surface, resulting from intermolecular interactions when the two are brought together. This happens in presence of a gaseous phase or another liquid phase not miscible with the first one. The degree of wetting (wettability) is determined by a force balance between adhesive and cohesive forces. There are two types of wetting: non-reactive wetting and reactive wetting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Langmuir–Blodgett trough</span> Laboratory equipment

A Langmuir–Blodgett trough is an item of laboratory apparatus that is used to compress monolayers of molecules on the surface of a given subphase and to measure surface phenomena due to this compression. It can also be used to deposit single or multiple monolayers on a solid substrate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Contact angle</span> The angle between a liquid–vapor interface and a solid surface

The contact angle is the angle between a liquid surface and a solid surface where they meet. More specifically, it is the angle between the surface tangent on the liquid–vapor interface and the tangent on the solid–liquid interface at their intersection. It quantifies the wettability of a solid surface by a liquid via the Young equation.

Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) theory aims to explain the physical adsorption of gas molecules on a solid surface and serves as the basis for an important analysis technique for the measurement of the specific surface area of materials. The observations are very often referred to as physical adsorption or physisorption. In 1938, Stephen Brunauer, Paul Hugh Emmett, and Edward Teller presented their theory in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. BET theory applies to systems of multilayer adsorption that usually utilizes a probing gas (called the adsorbate) that does not react chemically with the adsorptive (the material upon which the gas attaches to) to quantify specific surface area. Nitrogen is the most commonly employed gaseous adsorbate for probing surface(s). For this reason, standard BET analysis is most often conducted at the boiling temperature of N2 (77 K). Other probing adsorbates are also utilized, albeit less often, allowing the measurement of surface area at different temperatures and measurement scales. These include argon, carbon dioxide, and water. Specific surface area is a scale-dependent property, with no single true value of specific surface area definable, and thus quantities of specific surface area determined through BET theory may depend on the adsorbate molecule utilized and its adsorption cross section.

The sticking probability is the probability that molecules are trapped on surfaces and adsorb chemically. From Langmuir's adsorption isotherm, molecules cannot adsorb on surfaces when the adsorption sites are already occupied by other molecules, so the sticking probability can be expressed as follows:

Inner sphere complex is a type of surface complex that refers to the surface chemistry changing a water-surface interface to one without water molecules bridging a ligand to the metal ion. Formation of inner sphere complexes occurs when ions bind directly to the surface with no intervening water molecules. These types of surface complexes are restricted to ions that have a high affinity for surface sites and include specifically adsorbed ions that can bind to the surface through covalent bonding.

The Gibbs adsorption isotherm for multicomponent systems is an equation used to relate the changes in concentration of a component in contact with a surface with changes in the surface tension, which results in a corresponding change in surface energy. For a binary system, the Gibbs adsorption equation in terms of surface excess is:

Sticking coefficient is the term used in surface physics to describe the ratio of the number of adsorbate atoms that adsorb, or "stick", to a surface to the total number of atoms that impinge upon that surface during the same period of time. Sometimes the symbol Sc is used to denote this coefficient, and its value is between 1 and 0. The coefficient is a function of surface temperature, surface coverage (θ) and structural details as well as the kinetic energy of the impinging particles. The original formulation was for molecules adsorbing from the gas phase and the equation was later extended to adsorption from the liquid phase by comparison with molecular dynamics simulations. For use in adsorption from liquids the equation is expressed based on solute density rather than the pressure.

In fluid mechanics and mathematics, a capillary surface is a surface that represents the interface between two different fluids. As a consequence of being a surface, a capillary surface has no thickness in slight contrast with most real fluid interfaces.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Langmuir adsorption model</span> Model describing the adsorption of a mono-layer of gas molecules on an ideal flat surface

The Langmuir adsorption model explains adsorption by assuming an adsorbate behaves as an ideal gas at isothermal conditions. According to the model, adsorption and desorption are reversible processes. This model even explains the effect of pressure i.e. at these conditions the adsorbate's partial pressure, , is related to the volume of it, V, adsorbed onto a solid adsorbent. The adsorbent, as indicated in the figure, is assumed to be an ideal solid surface composed of a series of distinct sites capable of binding the adsorbate. The adsorbate binding is treated as a chemical reaction between the adsorbate gaseous molecule and an empty sorption site, S. This reaction yields an adsorbed species with an associated equilibrium constant :

Biofilm formation occurs when free floating microorganisms attach themselves to a surface. Although there are some beneficial uses of biofilms, they are generally considered undesirable, and means of biofilm prevention have been developed. Biofilms secrete extracellular polymeric substance that provides a structural matrix and facilitates adhesion for the microorganisms; the means of prevention have thus concentrated largely on two areas: killing the microbes that form the film, or preventing the adhesion of the microbes to a surface. Because biofilms protect the bacteria, they are often more resistant to traditional antimicrobial treatments, making them a serious health risk. For example, there are more than one million cases of catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI) reported each year, many of which can be attributed to bacterial biofilms. There is much research into the prevention of biofilms.

Biomaterials exhibit various degrees of compatibility with the harsh environment within a living organism. They need to be nonreactive chemically and physically with the body, as well as integrate when deposited into tissue. The extent of compatibility varies based on the application and material required. Often modifications to the surface of a biomaterial system are required to maximize performance. The surface can be modified in many ways, including plasma modification and applying coatings to the substrate. Surface modifications can be used to affect surface energy, adhesion, biocompatibility, chemical inertness, lubricity, sterility, asepsis, thrombogenicity, susceptibility to corrosion, degradation, and hydrophilicity.

The surface chemistry of paper is responsible for many important paper properties, such as gloss, waterproofing, and printability. Many components are used in the paper-making process that affect the surface.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elasto-capillarity</span> Physical phenomenon

Elasto-capillarity is the ability of capillary force to deform an elastic material. From the viewpoint of mechanics, elastocapillarity phenomena essentially involve competition between the elastic strain energy in the bulk and the energy on the surfaces/interfaces. In the modeling of these phenomena, some challenging issues are, among others, the exact characterization of energies at the micro scale, the solution of strongly nonlinear problems of structures with large deformation and moving boundary conditions, and instability of either solid structures or droplets/films.The capillary forces are generally negligible in the analysis of macroscopic structures but often play a significant role in many phenomena at small scales.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ideal surface</span>

An ideal solid surface is flat, rigid, perfectly smooth, and chemically homogeneous, and has zero contact angle hysteresis. Zero hysteresis implies the advancing and receding contact angles are equal.

The rise in core (RIC) method is an alternate reservoir wettability characterization method described by S. Ghedan and C. H. Canbaz in 2014. The method enables estimation of all wetting regions such as strongly water wet, intermediate water, oil wet and strongly oil wet regions in relatively quick and accurate measurements in terms of Contact angle rather than wettability index.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 H.J. Butt; K. Graf & M. Kappl (2006). "Adsorption". Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces (2 ed.). Federal Republic of Germany: Wiley-VCH. pp. 187–217. ISBN   978-3-527-40629-6.
  2. Carroll, Gregory T.; Jongejan, Mahthild G. M.; Pijper, Dirk; Feringa, Ben L. (2010). "Spontaneous generation and patterning of chiral polymeric surface toroids". Chemical Science. 1 (4): 469. doi:10.1039/c0sc00159g. ISSN   2041-6520. S2CID   96957407.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Erbil, H. Yildirim (1997). Handbook of Surface and Colloid Chemistry. USA: CRC Press LLC. pp. 266–307. ISBN   0-8493-9459-7.
  4. H.J. Butt; K. Graf & M. Kappl (2006). "Contact angle phenomena and wetting". Physics and Chemistry of Interfaces (2 ed.). Federal Republic of Germany: Wiley-VCH. pp. 125–152. ISBN   978-3-527-40629-6.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 "Solid surface energy data (SFE) for common polymers". www.surface-tension.de. Retrieved 28 May 2011.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Petrie, Edward M. "Determining Critical Surface Tension of Solid Substrates". Adhesives & Sealants Formulation. SpecialChem. Retrieved 28 May 2011.
  7. Cheraghian, Goshtasp (2017). "Evaluation of Clay and Fumed Silica Nanoparticles on Adsorption of Surfactant Polymer during Enhanced Oil Recovery". Journal of the Japan Petroleum Institute. 60 (2): 85–94. doi: 10.1627/jpi.60.85 .
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Owens, D.K. (1969) "Estimation of the surface Free Energy of Polymers" J. App. Polym. Sci. 13: 1741–1747.
  9. Mansky, P. et al., (1997) "Controlling Polymer-Surface Interactions with Random Copolymer Brushes" Science 275(5305): 1458–1460
  10. 1 2 Wolf, Rory A., "Surface Modification Techniques for Optimizing Adhesion to Automotive Plastics" http://www.enerconind.com/mediaLib/stml/techPaper/Enercon-surface-modification-techniques-for-optimizing-adhesion.pdf?ext=.pdf
  11. "Click Chemistry on Surfaces." Surface Coating Technology for Microarrays & Biochips. MicroSurfaces Inc., 2010. Web. 31 May 2011. < "Click chemistry on surfaces". Archived from the original on 2011-08-20. Retrieved 2011-06-06.>
  12. "Low Background PEG Coating for Biomolecule Immobilization." Surface Coating Technology for Microarrays & Biochips. MicroSurfaces Inc., 2010. Web. 31 May 2011. < "Low background PEG coating for biomolecule immobilization". Archived from the original on 2011-08-25. Retrieved 2011-06-06.>.
  13. 1 2 Vendra, Venkat K., Lin Wu, and Sitaraman Krishnan. Polymer Thin Films for Biomedical Applications. Web. 31 May 2011. <http://www.wiley-vch.de/books/sample/3527321551_c01.pdf>.
  14. Werner, Carsten, Manfred F. Maitz, and Claudia Sperling. "Current Strategies towards Hemocompatible Coatings." Journal of Materials Chemistry 17.32 (2007).
  15. Pitts, Julie. "The Many Uses of Teflon Or PTFE." EzineArticles. Web. 6 June 2011.