Side collision

Last updated
A crash test by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety shows the damage to a compact Ford Focus struck by a Ford Explorer SUV Ford Focus versus Ford Explorer crash test IIHS.jpg
A crash test by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety shows the damage to a compact Ford Focus struck by a Ford Explorer SUV
Side impact NCAP test of a 2007 Saturn Outlook. V05962P112.jpg
Side impact NCAP test of a 2007 Saturn Outlook.
This NHTSA collision test shows what happens when a Volkswagen New Beetle slides sideways into a utility pole or a tree. V06445P040.jpg
This NHTSA collision test shows what happens when a Volkswagen New Beetle slides sideways into a utility pole or a tree.
Two cars are involved in a side collision at an intersection in Tokyo, Japan Japanese car accident.jpg
Two cars are involved in a side collision at an intersection in Tokyo, Japan

A side collision is a vehicle crash where the side of one or more vehicles is impacted. These crashes typically occur at intersections, in parking lots, and when two vehicles pass on a multi-lane roadway.

Contents

Occurrences and effects

A 2016 study found that, in the EU, side impact collisions were significantly less common than frontal impact collisions, at rates of 22-29% and 61-69% respectively. [1] However, they tend to be much more dangerous. Another report commissioned by the EU in 2015 found that side impacts accounted for roughly 35-40% of passenger fatality and serious injury, as opposed to 55% attributed to head-on collisions. [2] A likely contributor to this fact is the amount of protection offered by the struck vehicle. Even when equipped with the safest cars on the road, these casualties occurred at much lower speeds than in head-on collisions, with passenger fatality and serious injury typically occurring at 50 km/h (~31 mph) in side impact collisions, as opposed to 70 km/h (~43 mph) for frontal impacts. [2] Additionally, side impacts tend to affect more vulnerable areas of the body. While front and rear impacts typically produced the most serious injuries in the lower extremities (legs and feet), side impacts typically resulted in most serious injuries in the head and chest regions. [1]

In 2008, a total of 5,265 (22%) out of 23,888 people were killed in vehicles which were struck in the side in the United States. [3]

For European motorcyclists, side impact is the second most frequent location of impact. [1]

For European cyclists, thorax injuries are associated with side-impact injuries in urban areas and/or at junctions. [1]

In several European countries, such as the UK, Sweden, and France, around one quarter of traffic injuries are produced by side collisions, but accounted for 29 to 38% of injuries which were fatal. [4]

In European vehicle side impact, 60% of casualties were "struck side", while 40% were "non struck side", in 2018. [4]

Fatal casualties count as 50% and 67% in UK and in France, in 2010 [4]

Also, side collision are not well managed with child restraints which are not enough taking into account the movement of the child's head and prevent contact with the car's interior. [4]

For light vans and minibuses in 2000 in UK and Germany, between 14% and 26% of accidents with passenger cars were side impacts. [4]

In Shanghai, in China, 23% of the 1097 serious accidents occurred between June 2005 and March 2013 are side impact accidents, there the leading collision mode, according to the Shanghai United Road Traffic Safety Scientific Research Center (SHUFO) database. [5] The head and neck are involved in around 64% of the casualties. [5]

Broadside or T-bone collision

Broadside collisions are where the side of one vehicle is impacted by the front or rear of another vehicle, forming a "T". In the United States and Canada this collision type is also known as a right-angle collision or T-bone collision; it is also sometimes referred to by the abbreviation "AABS" for "auto accident, broadside". [6] Vehicle damage and occupant injury are more likely to be severe, but severity varies based on the part of the vehicle that is struck, safety features present, the speeds of both vehicles, and vehicle weight and construction.

When a vehicle is hit on the side by another vehicle, the crumple zones of the striking vehicle will absorb some of the kinetic energy of the collision. The crumple zones of the struck vehicle may also absorb some of the collision's energy, particularly if the vehicle is not struck on its passenger compartment. Both vehicles are frequently turned from their original directions of travel. If the collision is severe, the struck vehicle may be spun or rolled over, potentially causing it to strike other vehicles, objects, or pedestrians. After the collision, the involved vehicles may be stuck together by the folding of their parts around each other.

An occupant on the struck side of a vehicle may sustain far more severe injuries than an otherwise similar front or rear collision crash.

Side-impact airbags can protect vehicle occupants during side collisions, but they face the same limitations as other airbags. Additionally, side impact wrecks are more likely to involve multiple individual collisions or sudden speed changes before motion ceases. Since the airbag can only provide protection during the first collision, it may leave occupants unprotected during subsequent collisions in the crash. However, the first collision in a crash typically has the most severe forces, so an effective airbag provides maximum benefit during the most severe portion of a crash.

Broadside collisions are frequently caused by a failure to yield right of way. In the case of collisions in an intersection, the cause is often a result of one vehicle failing to obey traffic signals (fail to stop or running past a red light). As with any crash, increased speed may increase crash severity.

Testing

Euro NCAP, IIHS and NHTSA test side impacts in different ways. As of 2015, they all test vehicle-to-vehicle side impacts, [7] [8] where heavier vehicles have lower fatality rates than lighter vehicles. [9]

NHTSA and Euro NCAP also test the more severe vehicle-into-pole side impacts, [10] where smaller vehicles have the same fatality rate as larger vehicles. [9]

Newer cars have improved safety in case of front crashes, but side impacts can also be deadly; about 9,700 people were killed in side impacts in the US in 2004. [11] Side airbags became mandatory in 2009 in the US, saving an estimated 1,000 lives per year. [12] Research indicates that the vehicle's underbody is the best place to reinforce structures to reduce intrusion by the pole. [13]

General list of side impacts

A side collision in Toronto Side collision.jpg
A side collision in Toronto

These are lists of cars with notable aspects of side impact.

List of cars after 2011

The NHTSA results are evaluated by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration using Office of Crashworthiness Standards, New Car Assessment Program (NCAP) Side Impact Laboratory Test Procedure [14] and Side Impact Rigid Pole Laboratory Test Procedure [15] to display a simple star-rating. The "primary purpose of the NCAP side impact program is to provide comparative vehicle side protection information to assist consumers in making vehicle purchase decisions, thereby providing an incentive for vehicle manufacturers to design safer vehicles." [15]

The IIHS results are evaluated by Insurance Institute for Highway Safety using their protocols. [16] [17]

This list shows the most notable of newer tested vehicles tested via NHTSA and IIHS. Some provide good protection, some less so, and some developed improved safety in response to a low result (Dodge Ram and Fiat 500). Some are common examples of their type.

Sorted roughly by rating, Head injury criterion (HIC) and Crush.

Side impact safety of newer cars (from 2011–present), by NHTSA and IIHS. Click <> to sort by parameter.
Year
[N 1]
Manufacturer Model Type Number
produced
[N 2]
Impactor (MDB)
into Vehicle [N 3]
Vehicle
into pole
Comment
IIHS
side
rating
Euro NCAP
side
rating
Maximum
Crush [N 4]
HIC
[N 5]
Rating
[N 6]
Maximum
Crush
HIC RLSA [N 7] Rating
2014 Jeep Wrangler SUV 1 million [18] mm [19] mmgPoor [20] [21]
2012 Chrysler 200 [22] Mid 202 mm [23] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg392 mm198751 g [24] Star full.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgHead injury criterion above threshold.Good [25]
2015 Toyota Hilux/Tacoma [26] Truck 5+ million [27] 305 mm125+292 [28] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar empty.svg516 mm45157 g [29] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svg
2013 Fiat 500 [30] Supermini 1+ million [31] 164 mm166+382 [32] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg354 mm22454 g [33] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgMDB: Pelvic force and pax RLSA within threshold.Good [34]
2012 Fiat 500 [35] Supermini 160 mm127+410 [36] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svg354 mm22454 g [33] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgMDB: Pax pelvic force over threshold, and RLSA near.
2013 Dodge Ram 1500 [37] Truck 365 mm16+30 [38] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg603 mm48348 g [39] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgAll parameters within limits. [40]
2011 Dodge Ram 1500 [41] Truck mmStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg462 mm51987 g [42] Star full.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgPole Test: Pelvic force and RLSA over threshold.
2014 Mercedes-Benz E-Class [43] Sedan129 mm92+244 [44] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg343 mm49253 g [45] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar empty.svgStar empty.svgPole Test: Pelvic force 4770 N of a threshold of 5525 N
2012 Chrysler Town & Country [46] Minivan 298 mm51+135 [47] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg389 mm29447 g [48] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgPole Test: Pelvic force 3503 N of a threshold of 5525 NGood [49]
2014 Audi Q5 [50] CUV 188 mm59+166 [51] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg467 mm25354 g [52] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg
2011 Volvo XC60 [53] CUV ½ million [54] 170 mm60+231 [55] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg462 mm24245 g [56] Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg
YearManufacturerModelTypeProducedmmStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgmmgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgCommentGoodStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg
  1. Model Year of car crash-tested, not year of Overall Rating. Older crash tests usually carry over to newer car models; easily checked by comparing ratings and document numbers for different years.
  2. Number of cars produced of this model.
  3. Also known as Moving Deformable Barrier.
  4. Free space left after impact.
  5. Head Injury Criteria (HIC36) has a threshold of 1000; lower is better. MDB HIC shows front+rear seat of impact side.
  6. Side Barrier Rating, combines front and rear seats.
  7. RLSA=Resultant Lower Spine Acceleration, measured in g-force. Detract rating over 50g. Threshold is 82g.

Limits are: [14] [15]
Moving Deformable Barrier (MDB): HIC max. 1000, Chest injury max. 44mm, abdominal injury max. 2500 Newton, pelvis injury max. 6000 N. There are additional limits for passenger similar to pole test.
Rigid Pole: HIC max. 1000, Lower Spine acceleration max. 82g, Pelvis sum max. 5525 N

List of cars before 2011

Sorted roughly by rating.

Side impact safety of older cars (before 2011) by NHTSA, IIHS and Euro NCAP.
Click <> to sort by parameter.
Year
[M 1]
Manufacturer Model Type Number
produced

[M 2]
NHTSA
rating
IIHS
side
rating
Euro NCAP
side
rating
Comment
2003-2006 Ford Crown Victoria Full-size Star full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar half.svg [57] Poor [58] [11] Structure rated "Poor"
2008-2015 Jeep Wrangler SUV 1 million [18] [19] Poor [20] [21] Structure rated "Acceptable"
2004 Mitsubishi Galant SedanStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar half.svg [59] Poor [60] 2005 with airbag is Good at IIHS
YearManufacturerModelTypeProducedStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar half.svgGoodStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svgStar full.svg
  1. Model Year of car crash-tested, not year of Overall Rating. Older crash tests usually carry over to newer car models; easily checked by comparing ratings and document numbers for different years.
  2. Number of cars produced of this model.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Airbag</span> Vehicle safety device

An airbag is a vehicle occupant-restraint system using a bag designed to inflate extremely quickly, then quickly deflate during a collision. It consists of an airbag cushion, a flexible fabric bag, an inflation module, and an impact sensor. The purpose of the airbag is to provide a vehicle occupant with soft cushioning and restraint during a collision. It can reduce injuries between the flailing occupant and the interior of the vehicle.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crash test dummy</span> Full-scale anthropomorphic test devices that simulate human bodies in vehicle crash testing

A crash test dummy, or simply dummy, is a full-scale anthropomorphic test device (ATD) that simulates the dimensions, weight proportions and articulation of the human body during a traffic collision. Dummies are used by researchers, automobile and aircraft manufacturers to predict the injuries a person might sustain in a crash. Modern dummies are usually instrumented to record data such as velocity of impact, crushing force, bending, folding, or torque of the body, and deceleration rates during a collision.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crumple zone</span> Structural feature used in vehicles

Crumple zones, crush zones, or crash zones are a structural safety feature used in vehicles, mainly in automobiles, to increase the time over which a change in velocity occurs from the impact during a collision by a controlled deformation; in recent years, it is also incorporated into trains and railcars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crash test</span> Form of destructive testing

A crash test is a form of destructive testing usually performed in order to ensure safe design standards in crashworthiness and crash compatibility for various modes of transportation or related systems and components.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Automotive safety</span> Study and practice to minimize the occurrence and consequences of motor vehicle accidents

Automotive safety is the study and practice of automotive design, construction, equipment and regulation to minimize the occurrence and consequences of traffic collisions involving motor vehicles. Road traffic safety more broadly includes roadway design.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bumper (car)</span> Structure at front and rear ends of a car

A bumper is a structure attached to or integrated with the front and rear ends of a motor vehicle, to absorb impact in a minor collision, ideally minimizing repair costs. Stiff metal bumpers appeared on automobiles as early as 1904 that had a mainly ornamental function. Numerous developments, improvements in materials and technologies, as well as greater focus on functionality for protecting vehicle components and improving safety have changed bumpers over the years. Bumpers ideally minimize height mismatches between vehicles and protect pedestrians from injury. Regulatory measures have been enacted to reduce vehicle repair costs and, more recently, impact on pedestrians.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Euro NCAP</span> Car safety assessment programme

The European New Car Assessment Programme is a European voluntary car safety performance assessment programme based in Leuven, Belgium. Formed in 1996, the first results were released in February 1997. It was originally started by the Transport Research Laboratory for the UK Department for Transport but later backed by several European governments, as well as by the European Union (EU). Their slogan is "For Safer Cars".

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is an agency of the U.S. federal government, part of the Department of Transportation, focused on transportation safety in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chevrolet Venture</span> Motor vehicle

The Chevrolet Venture is a minivan produced by General Motors for the 1997 to 2005 model years. The Chevrolet Venture, along with most of its General Motors minivan siblings, was built at GM's Doraville, Georgia, assembly plant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Insurance Institute for Highway Safety</span> U.S. nonprofit organization

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety and Highway Loss Data Institute (IIHS-HLDI) is an American nonprofit organization. It was established in 1959, and it is noted for its safety reviews of vehicles in various simulated traffic situations, including the effectiveness of a vehicle's structural integrity and safety systems during a collision, in addition to examining improvement on such elements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fiat 500 (2007)</span> Motor vehicle

The Fiat 500 is an A-segment city car manufactured and marketed by the Fiat subdivision of Stellantis since 2007. It is available in hatchback coupé and fixed-profile convertible body styles, over a single generation — with an intermediate facelift in Europe with model year 2016. The 500 is internally designated as the Type 312 by FCA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WHIPS</span>

Whiplash Protection System (WHIPS) is a system to protect against automotive whiplash injuries introduced by Volvo in 1998. It was launched when the Volvo S80 was released for the 1999 model year and has since been part of the standard equipment of all new Volvo cars.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collision avoidance system</span> Motorcar safety system

A collision avoidance system (CAS), also known as a pre-crash system, forward collision warning system (FCW), or collision mitigation system, is an advanced driver-assistance system designed to prevent or reduce the severity of a collision. In its basic form, a forward collision warning system monitors a vehicle's speed, the speed of the vehicle in front of it, and the distance between the vehicles, so that it can provide a warning to the driver if the vehicles get too close, potentially helping to avoid a crash. Various technologies and sensors that are used include radar (all-weather) and sometimes laser (LIDAR) and cameras to detect an imminent crash. GPS sensors can detect fixed dangers such as approaching stop signs through a location database. Pedestrian detection can also be a feature of these types of systems.

G-Con is Honda Motor Co.'s internal passive safety standard. G-Con is short for G-Force Control. The standards incorporated into G-Con are constantly updated to benchmark against many of the world's toughest crash safety regulations as well as against data collected from real-world accident cases. The objective of G-Con is to control the impact energy (G-force) of a collision and reduce injuries to the vehicle occupants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Latin NCAP</span> Automobile safety assessment programme for Latin America and the Caribbean

The Latin New Car Assessment Programme is an automobile safety assessment programme for Latin America and the Caribbean. Founded in 2010, it offers independent information to consumers about the safety levels of new cars in the market. Latin NCAP tests are based in international renowned methodologies, with vehicles awarded a safety rating between 0 and 5 stars, indicating the protection the cars offer to adult and child occupants. The programme started as a joint initiative and in 2014 it was established as an association under a legal entity framework.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Automated emergency braking system</span>

The World Forum for Harmonization of Vehicle Regulations define AEBS. UN ECE regulation 131 requires a system which can automatically detect a potential forward collision and activate the vehicle braking system to decelerate a vehicle with the purpose of avoiding or mitigating a collision. UN ECE regulation 152 says deceleration has to be at least 5 metres per second squared.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New Car Assessment Program</span> Government car safety evaluation program

A New Car Assessment Program is a government car safety program tasked with evaluating new automobile designs for performance against various safety threats.

The Bharat New Car Assessment Program, usually known as the Bharat NCAP, is a upcoming New Car Assessment Program for India. Cars sold in the country will be assigned by star ratings based on their safety performance. It will be implemented in phases, according to the plans being drawn up by the National Automotive Testing and R&D Infrastructure Project. It is the 10th NCAP in the world and is being set up by the government of India.

specialises in vehicle crashworthiness with a background in accident and injury investigation/analysis.

The GlobalNew Car Assessment Programme is a project of the Towards Zero Foundation, a UK-registered charity. The programme aims to promote the sale of safer cars in developing markets by empowering consumers with objective information about the safety of vehicles. Global NCAP supports the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the target to halve road deaths and injuries by 2030, and the full implementation of the Global Plan for the UN's Decade of Action for Road Safety especially the recommended activities for vehicles.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-05-16. Retrieved 2019-06-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  2. 1 2 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-06-02. Retrieved 2019-06-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  3. Johnson, Nicholas S. (May 3, 2011). Assessment of Crash Energy - Based Side Impact Reconstruction Accuracy (Thesis). Virginia Tech via vtechworks.lib.vt.edu.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2019-06-24. Retrieved 2019-06-15.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  5. 1 2 https://www-esv.nhtsa.dot.gov/Proceedings/24/files/24ESV-000016.PDF [ bare URL PDF ]
  6. Logan, Carolynn M.; Rice, M. Katherine (1987). Logan's Medical and Scientific Abbreviations . Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Company. p.  3. ISBN   0-397-54589-4.
  7. "NHTSA Crash Test". Consumer Reports . April 2014. Retrieved 5 October 2015.
  8. "Euro NCAP - Side Mobile Barrier". Euro NCAP . Retrieved 5 October 2015.
  9. 1 2 Ray, M.H. (1999). "Impact conditions in side-impact collisions with fixed roadside objects". Accident Analysis & Prevention. 31 (1–2): 21–30. doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(98)00041-4. PMID   10084615.
  10. "Euro NCAP - Side Pole". Euro NCAP . Retrieved 5 October 2015.
  11. 1 2 "Impala, Avalon are top large cars in side crash test". iihs.org. Archived from the original on 5 September 2015. Retrieved 7 October 2015.
  12. Bengt Halvorson (26 July 2007). "Top 20 Most Dangerous Vehicles". Forbes. Archived from the original on 25 September 2015.
  13. Billot et al. "Pole Impact Test: Study of the two current Candidates in Terms of Cost and Benefits for France" page 3-4. PSA Peugeot Citroën
  14. 1 2 Side Impact Laboratory Test Procedure, Moving Deformable Barrier NHTSA Office of Crashworthiness Standards , September 2012. 285 pages in 9MB
  15. 1 2 3 Side Impact Laboratory Test Procedure, Rigid Pole NHTSA Office of Crashworthiness Standards , September 2012. 224 pages in 8MB
  16. "About our tests". IIHS-HLDI crash testing and highway safety.
  17. "Technical protocols". iihs.org.
  18. 1 2 "One in a Million: Toledo Assembly Complex Marks Production of One-Millionth Jeep Wrangler JK" (Press release). Chrysler Group LLC. Retrieved 16 February 2014.
  19. 1 2 "2016 Jeep Wrangler 2DR 4WD" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  20. 1 2 "2015 Jeep Wrangler, Small SUV". iihs.org.
  21. 1 2 Sean Williams (16 March 2014). "5 Auto Brands That Fared the Worst in the IIHS Crash Safety Tests -- No. 2 Is a Real Shock!". The Motley Fool . Archived from the original on 17 January 2015.
  22. "2014 Chrysler 200 4 DR FWD" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  23. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #7484 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2012 Chrysler 200 LX Four Door Sedan Calspan , 17 November 2011. 279 pages in 50MB
  24. NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #7477 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2012 Chrysler 200 LX Four Door Sedan Calspan , 17 November 2011. 158 pages in 20MB
  25. "Chrysler 200". iihs.org.
  26. "2015 Toyota Tacoma PU/EC 4WD" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  27. 2010 Toyota Land Cruiser - Top Speed, Top Speed
  28. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #8992 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2015 Toyota Tacoma PU-EC KARCO Engineering, 11 November 2014. 162 pages in 8MB
  29. NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #8994 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2015 Toyota Tacoma PU-EC KARCO Engineering, 12 November 2014. 106 pages in 6MB
  30. "2016 Fiat 500 3 HB FWD" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  31. "Fiat 500 European sales". Left-Lane.com. Archived from the original on 2014-06-03. Retrieved 2014-05-23.
  32. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #8044 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2013 Fiat 500 3-Door Hatchback Medical College of Wisconsin , 15 November 2012. 165 pages in 13MB
  33. 1 2 NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #7511 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2012 Fiat 500 Pop 3-Dr Hatchback KARCO Engineering, 24 November 2011. 101 pages in 11MB
  34. "2015 Fiat 500, Minicar". iihs.org.
  35. "2012 Fiat 500 3 HB FWD Early Release" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  36. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #7507 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2012 FIAT 500 POP 3-DOOR HATCHBACK KARCO Engineering, 23 November 2011. 154 pages in 8MB
  37. "2016 Ram 1500 Quad PU/EC 4WD" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  38. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #8074 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2013 Ram 1500 4-Door Quad Cab Pickup Medical College of Wisconsin , 20 December 2012. 156 pages in 14MB
  39. NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #8076 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2013 Ram 1500 4-Door Quad Cab Pickup Medical College of Wisconsin , 26 December 2012. 106 pages in 8MB
  40. "2012 Dodge Ram 1500 Crew cab pickup". IIHS-HLDI crash testing and highway safety.
  41. "2012 Ram 1500 Regular PU/RC 4WD" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  42. NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #7065 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2011 Ram 1500 ST Quad Cab 4X2 Transportation Research Center, Ohio, 20 September 2010. 118 pages in 11MB
  43. "2016 Mercedes-Benz E-Class 4 DR RWD" National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (click Side Crash)
  44. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #8445 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2014 Mercedes-Benz E-350 4-Door Sedan Transportation Research Center, Ohio, 19 December 2013. 210 pages in 23MB
  45. NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #8443 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2014 Mercedes-Benz E-350 4-Door Sedan Transportation Research Center, Ohio, 19 December 2013. 121 pages in 17MB
  46. "2016 Chrysler Town And Country VAN FWD" National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (click Side Crash)
  47. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #7461 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2012 Chrysler Town & Country Minivan MGA Research , 21 October 2011. 206 pages in 11MB
  48. NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #7455 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2012 Chrysler Town & Country Minivan MGA Research , 21 October 2011. 130 pages in 8MB
  49. "2015 Chrysler Town & Country, Minivan". iihs.org.
  50. "2016 Audi Q5 SUV AWD " NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  51. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #8536 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2014 Audi Q5 Hybrid Quattro 5DR MPV KARCO Engineering, 18 February 2014. 159 pages in 8MB
  52. NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #8532 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2014 Audi Q5 2.0T Quattro 5DR MPV KARCO Engineering, 17 February 2014. 104 pages in 6MB
  53. "2016 Volvo XC60 SUV AWD" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  54. "Volvo XC60, global cumulative sales of 500000 units. Released five years in achieving | Responsejp (Automotive business and overseas market )". en.responsejp.com. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 13 January 2022.
  55. NCAP Moving Deformable Barrier Side Impact Test #7118 at 62 km/h (38 mph), 2011 VOLVO XC60 KARCO Engineering, 20 October 2010. 134 pages in 8MB
  56. NCAP Side Impact Pole Test #7114 at 32 km/h (20 mph), 2011 VOLVO XC60 KARCO Engineering, 18 October 2010. 87 pages in 5MB
  57. "2003 Ford Crown Victoria 4-DR" National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (click Side Crash)
  58. Large family car side crash test ratings Archived 2016-03-04 at the Wayback Machine IIHS, 18 June 2006
  59. "2004 Mitsubishi Galant 4-DR" NHTSA (click Side Crash)
  60. "2004 Mitsubishi Galant, Midsize". iihs.org.