Special Marriage Act, 1954

Last updated

The Special Marriage Act, 1954
Emblem of India.svg
Parliament of India
  • An Act to provide a special form of marriage on certain cases, for the registration of such and certain other marriages and for divorce.
Citation No.43 of 1954
Enacted by Parliament of India
Assented to9 October 1954
Commenced1 January 1955
Status: In force

The Special Marriage Act, 1954 is an Act of the Parliament of India with provision for civil marriage (or "registered marriage") for people of India and all Indian nationals in foreign countries, irrelevant of the religion or faith followed by either party. [1] The Act originated from a piece of legislation proposed during the late 19th century. Marriages solemnized under Special Marriage Act are not governed by personal laws. [2]

Contents

Background

Henry Sumner Maine first introduced Act III of 1872, which would permit any dissenters to marry whomever they chose under a new civil marriage law. In the final wording, the law sought to legitimize marriages for those willing to renounce their profession of faith altogether ("I do not profess the Hindu, Christian, Jewish, etc. religion"). It can apply in inter-caste and inter-religion marriages. [3] The Bill faced opposition from local governments and administrators, who believed that it would encourage marriages based on lust, which would inevitably lead to immorality. [4]

The Special Marriage Act, 1954 replaced the old Act III, 1872. The new enactment had three major objectives:

  1. To provide a special form of marriage in certain cases,
  2. to provide for registration of certain marriages and,
  3. to provide for divorce. [5]

Applicability

  1. Any person, irrespective of religion. [6]
  2. Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, Christians, Parsis, or Jews can also perform marriage under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. [6]
  3. Inter-religion marriages are performed under this Act. [6]
  4. This Act is applicable to the entire territory of India and extends to intending spouses who are both Indian nationals living abroad. [6]
  5. Indian national living abroad. [7]

6. It also applies to a marriage between foreign national and indian national within India.

Procedure

The marriage performed under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 is a civil contract. There is no need for rites or wedding ceremonies. [8]

The parties have to file a Notice of Intended Marriage on a specified form to the Marriage Registrar of the district in which one of the parties resides. The party must have resided there for at least thirty days immediately preceding the filing. [9]

The notice is published and a thirty-day waiting period is required during which objections may be raised to the marriage. At the conclusion of the waiting period, the marriage may be solemnised at a specified Marriage Office. [9]

Marriage is solemnised by each party declaring "I, (A), take thee (B), to be my lawful wife (or husband)," in the presence of the Marriage Officer and three witnesses. [9] A marriage certificate is issued directly by the Registrar of Marriage appointed by the Govt. of India.

Conditions for marriage

  1. Each party involved should have no other subsisting valid marriage. In other words, the resulting marriage should be monogamous for both parties. [9]
  2. The groom must be at least 21 years old; the bride must be at least 18 years old. [9]
  3. The parties should be competent in regard to their mental capacity to the extent that they are able to give valid consent for the marriage. [9]
  4. The parties should not fall within the degree of prohibited relationship. [10]

Succession to the property

Succession to the property of person married under this Act or customary marriage registered under this Act and that of their children, are governed by Indian Succession Act. [11] However, if the parties to the marriage are Hindu, Buddhist, Sikh or Jain religion, the succession to their property will be governed by Hindu succession Act.

The Supreme Court of India, in 2006, made it required to enroll all relational unions. In India, a marriage can either be enlisted under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 or under the Special Marriage Act, 1954. The Hindu Marriage Act is pertinent to Hindus, though the Special Marriage Act is appropriate to all residents of India regardless of their religion applicable at Court marriage.

Judicial Review

Supriyo v. Union of India

The petition requested the Supreme Court to recognise the marriage between any two persons, regardless of gender identity and sexual orientation, and declare the notice and objection provisions as void, by enforcing the fundamental rights guaranteed under Articles 14, 15, 19 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17]

Nikesh P.P. & Sonu M.S filed a petition with Kerala High Court on 24 January 2020. Dr Kavita Arora & Ankita Khanna filed a petition with Delhi High Court on 8 October 2020 and they were joined by other petitioners over the course of time. [13] [14] On 6 January 2023, their petitions were transferred to Supreme Court to be heard along with Supriyo v. Union of India (2023). [18] [19] Additionally, most of the petitioners challenged the notice and objection provisions of the Special Marriage Act and the Foreign Marriage Act of 1969 which hurt vulnerable minorities. [15] [17]

See also

Related Research Articles

The Uniform Civil Code is a proposal in India to formulate and implement personal laws of citizens which apply on all citizens equally regardless of their religion. Currently, personal laws of various communities are governed by their religious scriptures. Implementation of a uniform civil code across the nation is pursued by India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. Personal laws cover marriage, divorce, inheritance, adoption and maintenance. While articles 25-28 of the Indian Constitution guarantee religious freedom to Indian citizens and allow religious groups to maintain their own affairs, article 44 expects the Indian state to apply directive principles and common law for all Indian citizens while formulating national policies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supreme Court of India</span> Highest judicial body in India

The Supreme Court of India is the supreme judicial authority and the highest court of the Republic of India. It is the final court of appeal for all civil and criminal cases in India. It also has the power of judicial review. The Supreme Court, which consists of the Chief Justice of India and a maximum of fellow 33 judges, has extensive powers in the form of original, appellate and advisory jurisdictions.

The chief instrument through which judicial activism has flourished in India is public interest litigation (PIL) or social action litigation (SAL). It refers to litigation undertaken to secure public interest and demonstrates the availability of justice to socially-disadvantaged parties and was introduced by Justice P. N. Bhagwati and Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer. It is a relaxation on the traditional rule of locus standi. Before 1980s the judiciary and the Supreme Court of India entertained litigation only from parties affected directly or indirectly by the defendant. It heard and decided cases only under its original and appellate jurisdictions. However, the Supreme Court began permitting cases on the grounds of public interest litigation, which means that even people who are not directly involved in the case may bring matters of public interest to the court. It is the court's privilege to entertain the application for the PIL.

The Fundamental Rights in India enshrined in part III of the Constitution of India guarantee civil liberties such that all Indians can lead their lives in peace and harmony as citizens of India. These rights are known as "fundamental" as they are the most essential for all-round development i.e., material, intellectual, moral and spiritual and protected by fundamental law of the land i.e. constitution. If the rights provided by Constitution especially the Fundamental rights are violated the Supreme Court and the High Courts can issue writs under Articles 32 and 226 of the Constitution, respectively, directing the State Machinery for enforcement of the fundamental rights.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">C. B. Muthamma</span> Indian civil servant and diplomat

Chonira Belliappa Muthamma was the first woman to clear the Indian Civil Services examinations. She was also the first woman to join the Indian Foreign Service. She was the first Indian woman diplomat as well. Later, she became the first Indian woman Ambassador also. She is remembered for her successful crusade for gender equality in the Indian Civil Services.

Christian personal law or family law regulates adoption, divorce, guardianship, marriage and succession in India. The provisions of canon law concerning marriage are recognised as the personal law of Roman Catholics in India. Marriages of Indian Christians are regulated by the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872. Christian personal law is not applicable in Goa; instead, the Goa civil code is the set of civil laws that regulate the residents of the Indian state of Goa. In India as a whole, there are religion-specific civil codes that separately govern adherents of different religions. Goa is an exception to that rule in that a single secular code governs all Goans, irrespective of religion, ethnicity or linguistic affiliation.

The Hindu Marriage Act (HMA) is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted in 1955 which was passed on 18 May. Three other important acts were also enacted as part of the Hindu Code Bills during this time: the Hindu Succession Act (1956), the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act (1956), the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act (1956).

India does not recognise same-sex marriage, civil unions or other forms of partnerships, but provides some limited legal recognition to cohabiting same-sex couples in the form of live-in relationships. Several same-sex couples have married in traditional Hindu ceremonies since the late 1980s; however, these marriages are not registered with the state and couples do not enjoy all the same rights and benefits as married opposite-sex couples. The Supreme Court of India in August 2022 provided social security rights to those in same-sex live-in relationships while also recognising same-sex couples as being part of a "family unit".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bal Patil</span> Indian writer (1932–2011)

Bal Patil was a Jain scholar, journalist, social activist and Jain minority status advocate from Mumbai, Maharashtra. He was appointed as a member of State Minority Commission by the Govt. of Maharashtra from 2001 to 2004. He was the Secretary-General of All India Jain Minority Forum, New Delhi—a position he held until his death—and was an ardent advocate of minority status for Jainism. The Jain minority cause gained prominence when he petitioned the Supreme Court of India for the recognition of Jain religious minority status on par with other Indian minorities as per the two recommendations by the National Minorities Commission. He was also the first non-medical President of the National Society for the Prevention of Heart Disease & Rehabilitation, Mumbai. He has also authored many books on Jainism and presented several papers at various seminars and conferences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marriage Act, 1961 (South Africa)</span>

The Marriage Act, 1961 is an act of the Parliament of South Africa governing the solemnisation and registration of marriages in South Africa. It does not deal with the dissolution of marriages, which is governed by the Divorce Act, 1979, or with matrimonial property regimes and the financial consequences of marriage, which are governed by the Matrimonial Property Act, 1984. Some issues relating to marriage remain governed by the Roman-Dutch common law because they have never been addressed by Parliament.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Secularism in Bangladesh</span> Overview of the secularism in Bangladesh

Secularism in Bangladesh is known as "neutrality of religion" under Bangladeshi law. In the Constitution of Bangladesh, secularism is mentioned in the preamble as one of the fundamental principles of Bangladeshi law. Article 8 enshrines secularism as one of the fundamental principles of state policy. Article 12 elaborates further on secularism and freedom of religion.

Lily Isabel Thomas was an Indian lawyer who initiated improvement and change to existing laws by filing petitions in India's apex court, the Supreme Court of India and regional courts. Her petitions resulted in changes to laws to prevent convicted politicians getting elected, the addition of a new marriage law and protections for parliamentarians. She was hailed most notably for petitioning to amend the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Subodh Markandeya</span>

Subodh Markandeya is a senior Indian lawyer, author and judicial activist. He primarily practices at the Supreme Court of India, but also appears in various high courts. He has served as the standing counsel for Government of India, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), State of Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh Financial Corporation (UPFC), Uttar Pradesh State Electricity Board (U.P.S.E.B.), Uttar Pradesh Jal Nigam and numerous developmental authorities. He was appointed 'amicus curiae' by the Supreme Court in the 'Tihar Jail Enquiry' (1982–85).

<i>Sarla Mudgal, & others. v. Union of India</i> 1995 Supreme Court of India case

Sarla Mudgal v. Union Of India is a Supreme Court of India case. Its judgement in 1995 laid down the principles against the practice of solemnizing second marriage by conversion to Islam, with first marriage not being dissolved. The verdict discusses issue of bigamy, the conflict between the personal laws existing on matters of marriage and invokes article 44 of Indian Constitution. It is considered a landmark decision that highlighted the need for a uniform civil code.

<i>Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India</i> Indian LGBT Rights Case Law

Navtej Singh Johar &Ors. v. Union of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice (2018) is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India that decriminalised all consensual sex among adults, including homosexual sex.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">T. G. Mohandas</span> Indian writer social critic

T. G. Mohandas is an Indian lawyer, social critic, writer, journalist and television presenter from Kerala. Mohandas was the state convener of Bharatiya Janata Party's Intellectual Cell and the General Secretary in 1997 of Bharateeya Vichara Kendram and its vice-president in 2006 and served also as General Manager of Ayodhya Printers, a company owned by the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS).

<i>Arun Kumar v. Inspector General of Registration</i> Indian LGBT Rights Case Law

Arun Kumar &Anr. versus Inspector General of Registration&Ors. (2019) is a decision of the Madras High Court which recognised trans woman as a "bride" within the meaning of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955 and prohibited genital-normalizing surgery for intersex infants and children except on life-threatening situations.

<i>Ujjawal v. State of Haryana</i> Indian LGBT Rights Case

Ujjawal &Anr. versus State of Haryana&Ors.(2021), a case where Punjab and Haryana High Court, refused to provide police protection to a couple facing threat to their lives and personal liberty, citing potential disruption to "social fabric of the society."

<i>Supriyo v. Union of India</i> Ongoing Indian LGBT rights case law

Supriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang v. Union of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice & other connected cases (2023) are a collection of landmark cases of the Supreme Court of India, which were filed to consider whether to extend right to marry and establish a family to sexual and gender minority individuals in India. A five-judge Constitution Bench, consisting of Chief Justice of India D.Y. Chandrachud, Justice S.K. Kaul, Justice S.R Bhat, Justice Hima Kohli and Justice P.S. Narasimha, heard 20 connected cases brought by 52 petitioners.

The Foreign Marriage Act, 1969 is an Act of the Parliament of India enacted on 31 August 1969. It was enacted due to the recommendations of the Third Law Commission with the object of streamlining the law relating to recognition of marriages solemnized outside India between Indian citizens, or an Indian citizen and a foreign citizen.

References

  1. ↑ "Special Marriage Act - Special Marriage Act 1954, Special Marriage Laws In India". I Love India. Retrieved 14 March 2022.
  2. ↑ "'Marriages under Special Marriage Act not governed by personal laws'". The Hindu. 29 March 2018.
  3. ↑ "10 things every Indian should know about the Special Marriage Act,1954". 9 December 2014.
  4. ↑ Perveez Mody, "Love and the Law: Love-Marriage in Delhi," Modern Asian Studies 36:1 (2002): 223-256
  5. ↑ "Divorce, under the Special Marriage Act, 1954". valkilno1.com. Archived from the original on 27 May 2010. Retrieved 24 September 2010.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "Registered Marriage Under Special Marriage Act, 1954". Tax4India. Archived from the original on 3 January 2010. Retrieved 24 September 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  7. ↑ "MEA Guidance on Indians Marrying abroad" (PDF).
  8. ↑ "Place And Form Of Solemnisation, Registered Marriage". Tax4India. Archived from the original on 3 January 2010. Retrieved 24 September 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "The Special Marriage Act, 1954". DelhiAdvocate. Archived from the original on 31 October 2010. Retrieved 24 September 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  10. ↑ "Necessary conditions for a registered marriage". Tax4India. Archived from the original on 3 January 2010. Retrieved 24 September 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  11. ↑ http://indiankanoon.org/doc/552306/ Bombay High court judgment reported by Indian Kanoon
  12. ↑ Guruswamy, Menaka; Katju, Arundhati; Borthakur, Shristi (14 November 2022), Supriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang versus Union Of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice. (PDF) (Writ Petition (Civil)), Supreme Court of India {{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  13. 1 2 Perumpallikuttiyil, George Varghese; A.R., Dileep; P.J., Joe Paul; Srinath, Manu; George, Rajan G. (24 January 2020), Nikesh P.P. & Sonu M.S. versus Union Of India thr.Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice. (PDF) (Writ Petition (Civil)), High Court of Kerala {{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  14. 1 2 Katju, Arundhati; Dhar, Surabhi (5 October 2020), Dr. Kavita Arora & Ankita Khanna versus Union Of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice. (PDF) (Writ Petition (Civil)), High Court of Delhi {{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  15. 1 2 Deshwal, Puneet (20 February 2023). "Supreme Court Issues Notice In Plea Seeking Recognition Of Transgender Persons Under Special Marriage Act 1954". www.verdictum.in. Retrieved 22 February 2023.
  16. ↑ Bhatia, Gautam; Saxena, Utkarsh; Sekhri, Abhinav; Jain, Hrishika (15 December 2022), Utkarsh Saxena & Ananya Kotia versus Union Of India thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice. (PDF) (Writ Petition (Civil)), Supreme Court of India {{citation}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  17. 1 2 "Same-Sex Couples Already Vulnerable, Public Notice Of Intended Wedding Under Special Marriage Act A Deterrent: Plea In Supreme Court, Notice Issued". www.livelaw.in. 6 January 2023. Retrieved 27 February 2023.
  18. ↑ "Supreme Court transfers to itself all petitions on same-sex marriage". The Hindu . 6 January 2023. ISSN   0971-751X . Retrieved 13 February 2023.
  19. ↑ Supriyo a.k.a Supriya Chakraborty & Abhay Dang versus Union Of India thr. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice, W.P.(C) No. 1011/2022 ( Supreme Court of India 6 January 2023).
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.