Washington, D.C., Admission Act

Last updated

Washington, D.C., Admission Act
Great Seal of the United States (obverse).svg
Long titleTo provide for the admission of the State of Washington, D.C. into the Union
Announced inthe 118th United States Congress
Sponsored by Eleanor Holmes Norton (D ‑ DC)
Number of co-sponsors206
Legislative history

The Washington, D.C., Admission Act, often referred to simply as the D.C. Admission Act, is a bill introduced during the 116th United States Congress. The bill would grant Washington, D.C., admission into the Union as a state (which would also make it the country's first and only city-state). The bill was originally introduced in the 116th Congress on January 3, 2019, and was reintroduced on January 4, 2021, and January 9, 2023, in the 117th and 118th Congresses. The United States House of Representatives passed it on April 22, 2021.

Contents

Background

The Constitution of the United States was drafted to provide for a federal capital district that was not part of any state. The new capital was to be no more than 100 square miles (260 km2) in area and under the exclusive control of the Congress. [1] In 1790, the Congress passed the Residence Act, which legislated the foundation of a new, permanent national capital, to be located along the banks of the Potomac River, using land ceded to the federal government by Maryland and Virginia. The District was designed as a square diamond, each side 10 miles (16 km) long, with 65 percent of the District's territory on the northeast bank of the Potomac River and 35 percent on the southwest bank. The District included the pre-existing county and city of Alexandria, as well as the new County of Washington, which included the new City of Washington and the pre-existing town of Georgetown, Maryland. [2] [3] The District was named "Columbia" after a poetic name for the United States. [4] [5]

In 1801, Congress passed the District of Columbia Organic Act, which formally placed the Government of the District of Columbia under the control of the Congress. [6] The Act meant that citizens living in the District were no longer residents of Maryland or Virginia and, as a consequence, no longer had representation in the Congress. [7]

The incorporation of Alexandria County into the District caused serious economic injury to that community, so it was retroceded to Virginia in 1846. (The county was reorganized into the Independent City of Alexandria and the adjacent County of Arlington.) This reduced the district to its current size of 65 square miles (170 km2). [8] The same act that retroceded Alexandria to Virginia also amalgamated the municipalities within Washington County to the City of Washington; which was simultaneously consolidated with the County of Washington and the District itself.

Many reforms enacted concerning the District have focused on extending the franchise and popular control of the local government. The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1961, under which the District of Columbia is treated as a state for purposes of the presidential election, except that it cannot have more electoral votes than the state with the least number of electors.

In 1970, Congress passed the District of Columbia Delegate Act, which allowed for the election of a non-voting delegate representing the District in the House of Representatives. [9]

Congress then passed the District of Columbia Home Rule Act in 1973, which replaced the appointed mayor and city council with an elected mayor and council. [10]

In 1978, a constitutional amendment was proposed that would have granted the District full representation and participation in Congress without granting it statehood. Introduced by Representative Don Edwards of California, the proposed amendment was approved by Congress on August 22, 1978, and dispatched to the states for ratification. The proposed amendment included a time clause that required states to ratify it within seven years of the proposal. But of 38 required, only 16 states had ratified the amendment by August 22, 1985, so the amendment failed. [11] The failure of the District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment saw the beginning of concerted efforts to bring about statehood for the District.

D.C. statehood movement

Even before the Voting Rights Amendment failed, voters in the District began looking at the statehood option. In 1980, voters approved the creation of a constitutional convention to meet and draw up a proposed constitution for a new state, in the same manner as other territories had before their admission as states. [12] This was ratified by voters in 1982, with the plan for a state named as "New Columbia". [13] This constitution mandates the selection of a shadow congressional delegation of two senators and a representative to lobby Congress for statehood. In November 1993, a statehood bill made it to the full House of Representatives for debate and a vote for the first time, where it was defeated by a 277–153 margin. [14] Since then, a statehood bill has been introduced every year without reaching a vote. [15]

In 2016, the mayor of the District, Muriel Bowser, called for a vote by residents on whether they approved of the proposal of admitting the District as a state. In November of the same year, a referendum was held in which 85.69% of those that voted approved the motion to petition Congress for admission. [16] Following this, the D.C. council passed a resolution changing the proposed name from "New Columbia" (which had been on the ballot), to "State of Washington, D.C.", with "D.C." standing for "Douglass Commonwealth", referring to Frederick Douglass, who lived in the District between 1877 and 1895. [17] In 2017, separate bills were introduced by the District's non-voting delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton, and Tom Carper, a senator from Delaware, for statehood, which again failed to reach a vote.

In 2019, following the 2018 election that saw the Democratic Party regain control of the House of Representatives, the Democratic leadership put its support behind the admission of the District as a state, [18] with Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the House of Representatives, one of the 155 co-sponsors of the bill introduced by Eleanor Holmes Norton in January 2019. [19] The House passed H.R. 1, a nonbinding resolution of support for statehood, in March 2019. [20]

On June 26, 2020, D.C. statehood was approved by a chamber of Congress for the first time when the House voted by 232 to 180 to approve the Washington, D.C., Admission Act, thereby sending it to the Senate. [21] Again sponsored in the Senate by Tom Carper, with the majority of the Democratic caucus as co-sponsors, the bill was the first time that the issue of D.C. statehood had reached the floor of the Senate. [22]

Provisions

The Washington, D.C., Admission Act would enact several individual provisions related to the new state's admission:

Opposition

Republicans have strongly opposed the legislation. Opponents of DC statehood also stated the bill violates the District Clause and the 23rd Amendment. [24]

It is also noted that both Republicans and Democrats have partisan concerns over DC statehood because the district leans heavily Democratic, to the point that no Republican has been elected to the Council of the District of Columbia since 2009. In the 2020 presidential election, 92% of votes in Washington, D.C., went to Joe Biden, the highest percentage across the entire country, which is a key reason why many Democrats have favored D.C. admission to the Union. [25]

On April 13, 2021, a group of 22 Republican state attorneys general led by Alan Wilson sent a letter to President Biden to oppose D.C. statehood. They threatened to challenge the Act in the US Supreme Court if the Washington D.C. Admissions Act were to pass. [26]

Alternatively, Republicans instead proposed that D.C. be retroceded into Maryland. On January 25, 2021, Representative Dusty Johnson introduced the District of Columbia-Maryland Reunion Act as H.R. 472, followed by Louie Gohmert as H.R. 2651 on April 19; in the Senate, Senator Roger Marshall sponsored S.1361 under the same name on April 22, 2021. [27] [28] [29]

On April 30, Democratic senator Joe Manchin came out against both H.R. 51 and S. 51, effectively dooming their passage. [30]

Opinion

A poll conducted by YouGov in June 2020 following the passing of the bill by the House of Representatives during the 116th Congress found opinion remained divided on the issue, with 40% in favor of D.C.'s admission as a state and 41% opposed. In this poll, 37% of respondents believed that admitting D.C. would favor Democrats over Republicans, while 30% felt it would benefit both parties equally. [31]

Other polls have shown a more positive reception to statehood. A poll undertaken in September 2020 by Data for Progress, a progressive think tank that itself supports statehood, found that support was at 43%, a seven-percent increase on a previous poll by the same group in March 2019. [32] Another poll conducted by Data for Progress in February 2021 found that 54% of likely voters supported D.C. statehood, and just 35% were opposed. Geoffrey Skelly at FiveThirtyEight noted that the question asked if they supported giving statehood "to the more than 714,000 Americans who live in Washington, D.C., so they can elect voting Senators and Representatives, just like Americans in every other state?", and suggested that it may have primed people in the poll to be more likely to give support for the measure. The reverse effect of this was seen when Rasmussen Reports asked the statehood question but stressed the constitutional objections to making the District of Columbia a state within the question, which led to just 29 percent of respondents supporting statehood versus 55 percent opposing it. Skelly noted that this could mean that advocates for D.C. statehood should focus on the equality argument in favor of it to win public support, while those that oppose it should focus on the legal constraints. [33] [34]

Timeline

Voting for the bill in the House of Representatives was along party lines, with Democrats in favor of admitting the District of Columbia as a state and Republicans opposed. In response to the passing of the bill in the House, several Republican members of the Senate labeled the legislation as a "power grab" as, in their view, it would give the Democrats an almost guaranteed two seats in the United States Senate, given that the District has voted overwhelmingly Democratic for decades. [35] The Trump administration also made clear that, were a bill admitting D.C. as a state to be passed by Congress, President Trump would veto it. [36]

The election of Joe Biden as president removed the threat of a presidential veto to such a bill, as Biden has declared his support to admitting D.C. [37] However, Mitch McConnell, the then-Senate majority leader, made it clear that while there remains a Republican majority in the Senate, any D.C. admission bill would not be granted a vote on the floor of the Senate. This would require the introduction of a new bill once the new session of Congress began on January 3, 2021. [37]

On January 4, 2021, Eleanor Holmes Norton, D.C.'s non-voting delegate, reintroduced H.R. 51 into the 117th Congress with a record 202 co-sponsors. [38] [39] On January 6, following the victory of the two Democratic candidates in the Senate elections in Georgia that gave the Democrats the majority, the mayor of Washington, D.C., Muriel Bowser, issued a statement renewing the call for statehood for the District, stating her desire to see a Statehood bill on the desk of President Biden within 100 days of the start of the new Congress. [40] The same day, the storming and occupation of the United States Capitol by supporters of President Trump led to calls from others for the District's status to be changed; because of its status, the activation of the District of Columbia National Guard to assist local law enforcement required the consent of the secretary of the Army, while the governors of Virginia and Maryland were able to activate units of their states' National Guard directly. [41] [42] On January 27, a companion bill, S. 51, was introduced into the Senate by Tom Carper with 38 co-sponsors (7 more signed on later by May 13). [43] S. 51 received no votes and H.R. 51 was not acted on in the Senate following Manchin's opposition to them. [30]

Legislative history

As of February 5,2024:

CongressShort titleBill number(s)Date introducedSponsor(s)No. of cosponsorsLatest action
116th Congress Washington, D.C., Admission Act of 2019 H.R. 51 January 3, 2019 Eleanor Holmes Norton (D‑DC)227Passed in the House (232–180)
S. 631 February 28, 2019 Tom Carper (D‑DE)42Died in committee
117th Congress Washington, D.C., Admission Act of 2021 H.R. 51 January 4, 2021 Eleanor Holmes Norton (D‑DC)216Passed in the House (216–208)
S. 51 January 26, 2021 Tom Carper (D‑DE)45Died in committee
118th Congress Washington, D.C., Admission Act of 2023 H.R. 51 January 9, 2023 Eleanor Holmes Norton (D‑DC)206Introduced in the House
S. 51 January 24, 2023 Tom Carper (D‑DE)46Introduced in the Senate

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution</span> 1961 amendment granting presidential electors to the District of Columbia

The Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution extends the right to participate in presidential elections to the District of Columbia. The amendment grants to the district electors in the Electoral College, as though it were a state, though the district can never have more electors than the least-populous state. How the electors are appointed is to be determined by Congress. The Twenty-third Amendment was proposed by the 86th Congress on June 16, 1960; it was ratified by the requisite number of states on March 29, 1961.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia's at-large congressional district</span> At-large U.S. House district for the District of Columbia

The District of Columbia's at-large congressional district is a congressional district encompassing all of Washington, D.C., the capital city of the United States. Article One of the United States Constitution instructs that only "States" may be represented in the United States Congress. Because the District of Columbia does not meet that criterion, the member elected from the at-large district is not permitted to participate in votes on the floor of the House. Instead, constituents of the seat elect a non-voting delegate to the chamber. Though the delegate lacks full voting privileges, they are permitted to sit on, cast votes in, and chair congressional committees and subcommittees. The delegate may also join party caucuses, introduce legislation, and hire staff to assist with constituent services.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mike Simpson</span> American politician & dentist (born 1950)

Michael Keith Simpson is an American politician and former dentist serving as the U.S. representative for Idaho's 2nd congressional district since 1999. The district covers most of the eastern portion of the state, including Idaho Falls, Pocatello, Sun Valley, Twin Falls and the northern two-thirds of Boise. A member of the Republican Party, Simpson was first elected to public office in 1984, and was elected to the House in the 1998 elections, succeeding Mike Crapo. He served as Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives from 1992 to 1998.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">51st state</span> Proposals to admit a new state into the United States

The 51st state in American political discourse refers to the concept of granting statehood to one of the United States' territories, splitting one or more of the existing states up to form a new state, or granting statehood to the District of Columbia, thereby increasing the number of states in the Union from 50 to 51.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia statehood movement</span> Movement to make the United States capital a state

The District of Columbia statehood movement is a political movement that advocates making the District of Columbia a U.S. state, to provide the residents of the District of Columbia with voting representation in the Congress and complete control over local affairs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nancy Mace</span> American politician (born 1977)

Nancy Ruth Mace is an American politician who has been the U.S. representative for South Carolina's 1st congressional district since 2021. Her district includes much of the state's share of the East Coast, from Charleston to Hilton Head Island.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia home rule</span> Autonomous rule in the United States capital

District of Columbia home rule is the District of Columbia residents' ability to govern their local affairs. As the federal capital, the Constitution grants the United States Congress exclusive jurisdiction over the District in "all cases whatsoever".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia federal voting rights</span> Suffrage and representation of the United States capital

Voting rights of citizens in the District of Columbia differ from the rights of citizens in the 50 U.S. states. The United States Constitution grants each state voting representation in both houses of the United States Congress. It defines the federal district as being outside of any state, and does not grant it any voting representation in Congress. The Constitution grants Congress exclusive jurisdiction over the District in "all cases whatsoever".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">District of Columbia retrocession</span> Return of some land of the District of Columbia to Virginia

District of Columbia retrocession is the act of returning some or all of the land that had been ceded to the federal government of the United States for the purpose of creating its federal district for the new national capital, which was moved from Philadelphia to what was then called the City of Washington in 1800. The land was originally ceded to the federal government by Virginia and Maryland in 1790. After moving through various stages of federal and state approval, the Virginia portion was returned in March 1847.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andy Harris (politician)</span> American politician (born 1957)

Andrew Peter Harris is an American politician and physician serving as the U.S. representative for Maryland's 1st congressional district since 2011. The district includes the entire Eastern Shore, as well as several eastern exurbs of Baltimore. He is the only Republican member of Maryland's congressional delegation. Harris previously served in the Maryland Senate.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alex Mooney</span> American politician (born 1971)

Alexander Xavier Mooney is an American politician serving since 2015 as the U.S. representative from West Virginia's 2nd congressional district. A member of the Republican Party, he represented the 3rd district in the Maryland State Senate from 1999 to 2011 and is a former chair of the Maryland Republican Party. He is the first Hispanic person elected to Congress from West Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jody Hice</span> American politician and radio host (born 1960)

Jody Brownlow Hice is an American politician, radio show host, and political activist who served as the U.S. representative for Georgia's 10th congressional district from 2015 to 2023. He is a member of the Republican Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Puerto Rico statehood movement</span> Movement to grant Puerto Rico U.S. statehood

The Puerto Rico statehood movement aims to make Puerto Rico a state of the United States. Puerto Rico is an unincorporated territorial possession of the United States acquired in 1898 following the Spanish–American War, making it "the oldest colony in the modern world". As of 2023, the population of Puerto Rico is 3.2 million, around half the average state population and higher than that of 19 U.S. states. Statehood is one of several competing options for the future political status of Puerto Rico, including: maintaining its current status, becoming fully independent, or becoming a freely associated state. Puerto Rico has held six referendums on the topic. These are non-binding, as the power to grant statehood lies with the US Congress. The most recent referendum was in November 2020, with a majority (52.52%) of those who voted opting for statehood.

The Territories Clause of the United States Constitution allows for Congress to "dispose of" Puerto Rico and allow it to become independent of the U.S. or, under the authority of the Admissions Clause for it to be admitted as a state of the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Washington, D.C., statehood referendum</span> District of Columbia referendum in support of becoming a U.S. state

A referendum on statehood for the District of Columbia was held on November 8, 2016. It was the first referendum on statehood to be held in the district. The District of Columbia was created following the passage of the Residence Act on July 9, 1790, which approved the creation of a national capital, the City of Washington on the Potomac River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">For the People Act</span> Election reform and anti-corruption bill in the 117th Congress

The Freedom to Vote Act, introduced as H.R. 1, is a bill in the United States Congress intended to expand voting rights, change campaign finance laws to reduce the influence of money in politics, ban partisan gerrymandering, and create new ethics rules for federal officeholders.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Venezuela TPS Act of 2019</span> Bill of the United States Congress responding to the 2019 Venezuelan Presidential Crisis

The Venezuela TPS Act of 2019 is a bill in the 116th United States Congress sponsored by Rep. Darren Soto (D-FL) and Mario Díaz-Balart (R-FL). It aims to extend temporary protected status to Venezuelan nationals in light of the 2019 Venezuelan presidential crisis and the crisis in Venezuela in general.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mike Garcia (politician)</span> American politician (born 1976)

Michael Joseph Garcia is an American politician and former United States Navy pilot serving as the U.S. representative for California's 27th congressional district. A Republican, he was first elected in a May 2020 special election and went on to win a full term in the general election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 Puerto Rican status referendum</span> Referendum on Puerto Rico becoming a US state

A referendum of the status of Puerto Rico was held on November 3, 2020, concurrently with the general election. The Referendum was announced by Puerto Rico Governor Wanda Vázquez Garced on May 16, 2020. This was the sixth referendum held on the status of Puerto Rico, with the previous one having taken place in 2017. This was the first referendum with a simple yes-or-no question, with voters having the option of voting for or against becoming a U.S. state. The New Progressive Party (PNP), of whom Vázquez is a member, supports statehood, while the opposition Popular Democratic Party (PDP) and Puerto Rican Independence Party (PIP) oppose it.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Puerto Rico Statehood Admission Act</span>

The Puerto Rico Status Act, H.R. 2757, was a bill introduced during the 116th United States Congress. The intention of the bill is to grant Puerto Rico, an unincorporated territory of the United States, admission into the Union as a state. The bill was originally introduced in the 116th Congress and was reintroduced as H.R. 1522, on March 2, 2021, in the 117th Congress. It was referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources with last action taken on June 16.

References

  1. ↑ "Constitution of the United States". National Archives and Records Administration . Retrieved July 22, 2008.
  2. ↑ "Georgetown Historic District". National Park Service . Retrieved July 5, 2008.
  3. ↑ "Alexandria's History". Alexandria Historical Society. Archived from the original on April 4, 2009. Retrieved April 4, 2009.
  4. ↑ Crew, Harvey W.; Webb, William Bensing; Wooldridge, John (1892). "IV. Permanent Capital Site Selected". Centennial History of the City of Washington, D.C. Dayton, OH: United Brethren Publishing House. p. 101. Retrieved June 1, 2011.
  5. ↑ "Get to Know D.C." Historical Society of Washington, D.C. Archived from the original on September 18, 2010. Retrieved July 11, 2011.
  6. ↑ Crew, Harvey W.; Webb, William Bensing; Wooldridge, John (1892). "IV. Permanent Capital Site Selected". Centennial History of the City of Washington, D.C. Dayton, OH: United Brethren Publishing House. p. 103.
  7. ↑ "Statement on the subject of The District of Columbia Fair and Equal Voting Rights Act" (PDF). American Bar Association. September 14, 2006. Retrieved August 10, 2011.
  8. ↑ Richards, Mark David (Spring–Summer 2004). "The Debates over the Retrocession of the District of Columbia, 1801–2004" (PDF). Washington History: 54–82. Archived from the original (PDF) on January 18, 2009. Retrieved January 16, 2009.
  9. ↑ "84 Stat. 845 - An Act to establish a Commission on the Organization of the Government of the District of Columbia and to provide for a Delegate to the House of Representatives from the District of Columbia". gov.info. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  10. ↑ "District of Columbia Home Rule Act". Government of the District of Columbia. February 1999. Retrieved May 27, 2008.
  11. ↑ "The 1978 D.C. Voting Representation Constitutional Amendment". DC Vote. Retrieved March 19, 2018.
  12. ↑ "Guide to the District of Columbia Statehood Constitutional Convention Records, 1982". Library.gwu.edu. Retrieved July 7, 2016.
  13. ↑ "DC Statehood: a Chronology". DC Statehood Green Party. Archived from the original on October 26, 2006. Retrieved December 29, 2008.
  14. ↑ Eaton, William (November 22, 1993). "House Overwhelmingly Turns Down D.C. Statehood Bill". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  15. ↑ Greenwood, Arin (December 20, 2012). "D.C. Statehood: Senate Bill By Joe Lieberman Would Make 'New Columbia' 51st State". The Huffington Post. Retrieved February 18, 2013.
  16. ↑ "DC Voters Elect Gray to Council, Approve Statehood Measure". 4 NBC Washington. November 8, 2016. Retrieved November 9, 2016.
  17. ↑ "DC Council approves name change if district becomes state". Washington Examiner. October 18, 2016. Retrieved April 5, 2017.
  18. ↑ Portnoy, Jenna (January 4, 2019). "House leadership gives its blessing to D.C. statehood". The Washington Post.
  19. ↑ Thomas, Connor (January 18, 2019). "Pelosi Among 155 Cosponsors of DC Statehood Bill in House". The Hoya. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  20. ↑ The Editorial Board (March 12, 2019). "The House finally voted to support D.C. statehood. It's a needed step". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  21. ↑ Millhiser, Ian (June 26, 2020). "DC is closer to becoming a state now than it has ever been". Vox. Retrieved August 9, 2020.
  22. ↑ "Norton Announces D.C. Statehood Bill Has Been Placed on Senate Floor Calendar for First Time in History". Congresswoman Eleanor Norton Holmes. September 10, 2020. Retrieved December 25, 2020.
  23. ↑ "Proposed State of Washington DC" (PDF). DC Statehood Commission. Government of the District of Columbia. October 19, 2016. Retrieved January 11, 2021.
  24. ↑ "Dems push for D.C. Statehood is an unconstitutional power grab". Republican Whip. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
  25. ↑ Feinberg, Andrew (April 23, 2021). "Everyone knows why Republicans really oppose DC statehood — even members of their own party". The Independent. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
  26. ↑ Zapata, Christian; Austermuhle, Martin (April 14, 2021). "Republican Attorneys General Decry D.C. Statehood As Unconstitutional". NPR News. National Public Radio. Retrieved August 10, 2022.
  27. ↑ Johnson, Dusty (March 5, 2021). "H.R.472 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): District of Columbia-Maryland Reunion Act". Congress.gov. Retrieved August 2, 2021.
  28. ↑ Gohmert, Louie (April 19, 2021). "H.R.2651 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): District of Columbia-Maryland Reunion Act". Congress.gov. Retrieved August 2, 2021.
  29. ↑ Marshall, Roger W. (April 22, 2021). "S.1361 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): District of Columbia-Maryland Reunion Act". Congress.gov. Retrieved August 2, 2021.
  30. 1 2 Kapur, Sahil; Clark, Dartunorro (April 30, 2021). "Manchin opposes D.C. Statehood, dealing a blow to Democratic priority". NBC News. Retrieved November 10, 2022.
  31. ↑ Sanders, Linley (June 26, 2020). "Registered voters split on whether Washington, D.C. should gain statehood". YouGov. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  32. ↑ McElwee, Sean; Ray, John (September 8, 2020). "Voters have moved in favor of DC and Puerto Rico statehood". Data for Progress. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  33. ↑ "A Record Number of Voters Support D.C. Statehood" (PDF). Data for Progress. February 19–22, 2021.
  34. ↑ Skelley, Geoffrey (March 26, 2021). "What Americans Think About D.C. Statehood, Anti-Asian Discrimination And LGBTQ Rights". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  35. ↑ "District of Columbia". 270 to Win. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  36. ↑ Zaslav, Ali; Byrd, Hayley (July 1, 2020). "Senate Republicans fiercely oppose DC statehood as political 'power grab'". CNN Politics. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  37. 1 2 Lefrak, Mikaela (November 12, 2020). "After The 2020 Election Results, Here's What's Next For D.C. Statehood". American University Radio. Retrieved December 15, 2020.
  38. ↑ Robertson, Thomas (January 3, 2021). "DC statehood boasts record support in new Congress". WTOP News. Retrieved January 5, 2021.
  39. ↑ H.R. 51
  40. ↑ Coleman, Justine (January 6, 2021). "Bowser renews call for vote on DC statehood under Biden". The Hill. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  41. ↑ Srikanth, Anagha (January 6, 2021). "DC statehood advocates sound off as National Guard is activated". The Hill. Retrieved January 7, 2021.
  42. ↑ Massimo, Rick (January 7, 2021). "Hogan: Federal approval to send National Guard during Capitol attack delayed". WTOP News. Retrieved January 8, 2021.
  43. ↑ Lefrak, Mikaela (January 27, 2021). "Record Number Of Senate Democrats Support D.C. Statehood Bill". DCist. Archived from the original on January 27, 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.