William Warelwast

Last updated

William Warelwast
Bishop of Exeter
Elected11 August 1107
Term ended c.  26 September 1137
Predecessor Osbern FitzOsbern
Successor Robert Warelwast
Other post(s) Archdeacon of Exeter
Orders
Consecration11 August 1107
by  Anselm
Personal details
Diedc. 26 September 1137

William Warelwast [lower-alpha 1] (died 1137) was a medieval Norman cleric and Bishop of Exeter in England. Warelwast was a native of Normandy, [lower-alpha 2] but little is known about his background before 1087, when he appears as a royal clerk for King William II. Most of his royal service to William was as a diplomatic envoy, as he was heavily involved in the king's dispute with Anselm, the Archbishop of Canterbury, which constituted the English theatre of the Investiture Controversy. He went several times to Rome as an emissary to the papacy on business related to Anselm, one of whose supporters, the medieval chronicler Eadmer, alleged that Warelwast bribed the pope and the papal officials to secure favourable outcomes for King William.

Contents

Possibly present at King William's death in a hunting accident, Warelwast served as a diplomat to the king's successor, Henry I. After the resolution of the Investiture Controversy, Warelwast was rewarded with the bishopric of Exeter in Devon, but he continued to serve Henry as a diplomat and royal judge. He began the construction of a new cathedral at Exeter, and he probably divided the diocese into archdeaconries. Warelwast went blind after 1120, and after his death in 1137 was succeeded by his nephew, Robert Warelwast.

Early life

Little is known of Warelwast's background or family before 1087. [1] Later in life he was involved in founding Augustinian houses of canons, which – according to historian D. W. Blake – implies that he was an Augustinian canon or spent some of his early years in a house of such canons. [2] Several medieval chroniclers hostile to Warelwast, including Eadmer, claim that he was illiterate, [3] but his career suggests otherwise, as it involved the extensive use of written documents. He must also have been an accomplished speaker, given the number of times he was used as a diplomat. He was possibly educated at Laon, where later in life he sent his nephew, Robert Warelwast, to school. Another nephew, William, became the bishop's steward. [1]

Warelwast may have been a clerk for King William I of England, as a confirmation charter from the time of King Stephen (reigned 1135–1154) records that a grant of churches in Exeter was given to Warelwast by "Willelmus, avus meus", or "William, my grandfather/ancestor"; [1] Stephen was a grandson of William I, who reigned 1066–1087. But this charter may be a forgery, or the Willelmus referred to may have been William II rather than William I. The charter itself is insufficient evidence to confidently assert that Warelwast served William I, even though most such grants were made as a reward for royal service. It may have been that Warelwast was awarded land by William I not because he was a royal servant but because he was a relative; certainly the late-medieval writer William Worcester claimed that Warelwast was related to the king. [4]

Royal clerk under King William II

The first reliable mentions of Warelwast occur early in the reign of King William II, when Warelwast appears as authorizing writs for the king. [5] As well as being a royal clerk, Warelwast acted as a judge in a legal case between St Florent Abbey in Saumur and Fécamp Abbey, heard before King William II some time between 1094 and 1099 at Foucarmont. [6]

Warelwast served the king as an envoy to Pope Urban II in 1095, when the king was seeking to have the newly appointed Archbishop of Canterbury, Anselm of Canterbury, removed from office. [7] He visited the pope with another royal clerk, Gerard, with orders to recognize Urban as pope in return for Anselm's deposition, at least according to Eadmer, an Anselm partisan. [8] The two clerks travelled very quickly, as they did not leave before 28 February 1095 and were back in England by 13 May 1095. [9] Eadmer claimed that the ambassadors were supposed to acquire a pallium, the symbol of an archbishop's authority, for the king to give to his new choice as archbishop. But although the king may have instructed his envoys to attempt to secure these objects, he was probably willing to negotiate and to settle for less. [10] The two clerks returned with a papal legate, Walter of Albano, who accepted the king's recognition of Urban but refused to allow Anselm's deposition. [8] The king did nevertheless manage to secure recognition of his royal rights in the church, and a concession that no papal legates or communications would be sent without his approval. It may well be that the king always regarded Anselm's deposition as unlikely. [10]

Warelwast was probably sent as an envoy to Urban in 1096 to bribe the pope into recalling the papal legate Jarento, who had been sent to England to protest the king's conduct towards the church. [11] In addition to his ambassadorial duties Warelwast acted as a royal justice under King William; the records of one case have survived. [12]

Shortly before Anselm went into exile in 1097 Warelwast searched his baggage, [13] probably looking for communications to the pope, either from Anselm or other English bishops rather than for valuables, and in particular for any letters of complaint. [14] Warelwast was the king's envoy at Rome when during his exile Anselm petitioned to have the king excommunicated, [15] which according to Eadmer, who was also present, Warelwast succeeded in preventing by bribing the pope and papal officials. The king had sent Warelwast to Urban at Christmas 1098, with his reply to a letter the pope had written ordering the restoration of Anselm's estates. [14]

Royal service for King Henry I

King Henry's Dream from a 12th-century manuscript of the Chronicon ex chronicis of John of Worcester Worcester.dream.jpg
King Henry's Dream from a 12th-century manuscript of the Chronicon ex chronicis of John of Worcester

Warelwast may have been with the hunting party on 2 August 1100 in which King William was accidentally killed, as he was one of the witnesses to the letter sent on 5 August 1100 from William IIs brother, the new King Henry I to Anselm recalling the archbishop. [1] [16] King Henry continued to use Warelwast as an ambassador, sending him to Rome in 1101 to bring back Pope Paschal II's reply to a letter written by Henry immediately after his accession. Henry was seeking a reconciliation with the papacy, and confirmed to the pope the rights and obedience which his father had rendered, but he also requested the same rights within the Church as his father had enjoyed, chiefly the lay investiture of bishops and the granting of the symbols of episcopal authority by laymen. Paschal declined to grant Henry those rights. [17] [18]

It was Warelwast who told Anselm in 1103 that the king would not permit his return to England. [13] This came after a failed joint mission by Warelwast and Anselm to Paschal attempting to resolve the dispute between Henry and the archbishop over the king's investiture of bishops, a dispute generally known as the Investiture Controversy. It is quite likely that the king had given instructions that if the mission failed, Warelwast was to inform Anselm that he should only to return to England if he agreed with the king's position in the dispute. [19] In 1106 Warelwast was the king's negotiator in the discussions that led to the settlement of the Investiture Controversy in England. [3] The king ultimately lost little, relinquishing the right to give the actual symbols of episcopal authority to a newly elected bishop in return for continuing to receive homage from the bishops. [20] Early in 1106 Warelwast was sent to Bec Abbey, where Anselm was residing in exile, to inform him of the settlement and deliver to the archbishop the king's invitation to return to England. [21] In May 1107 Warelwast acted as the king's envoy at Paschal's council at Troyes, where Paschal was attempting to secure support for Bohemond of Antioch's proposed campaign against Byzantium. Warelwast probably relayed to the pope the news that King Henry would make no contribution to Bohemond's efforts. [22]

Henry had reserved the episcopal see of Exeter for Warelwast since the death of Osbern FitzOsbern in 1103, but the controversy over investiture meant that his election and consecration were not possible before a settlement was reached. Instead the king gave Warelwast the office of Archdeacon of Exeter after Osbern's death. [1] The medieval chronicler William of Malmesbury records that Warelwast had earlier tried to remove Osbern from office, but this story probably originates with Eadmer and is of dubious veracity. [3] While archdeacon, Warelwast is recorded as being present at the transfer of a Devon church to Bath Cathedral. [23] He was elected Bishop of Exeter, and was consecrated on 11 August 1107, [24] by Anselm at the royal palace of Westminster. [25] Other bishops consecrated at the same time included William Giffard to Winchester, Roger of Salisbury to Salisbury, Reynelm to Hereford, and Urban to Llandaff. [26] Warelwast's elevation was a reward for his diplomatic efforts in the investiture crisis. [27] The mass consecration signalled the end of the investiture crisis in England. [26]

After his consecration Warelwast continued to serve the king, often appearing on documents or in accounts of the royal court. The bishop served the king as a messenger, once more carrying messages to Anselm in 1108. He also served as a royal judge, hearing a case at Tamworth in 1114 and another at Westbourne the same year. He was with the king in Normandy in 1111, 1113, and 1118, and may have been in Normandy more frequently. [28] During Henry's reign Warelwast was a witness to 20 of the king's charters. [29]

In 1115 Henry sent Warelwast back to Rome to negotiate with Paschal, who was angry that the king was prohibiting papal legates in England, not allowing clerics to appeal to the papal court, and was failing to secure papal sanction for church councils or the translation of bishops. Warelwast was unable to change the pope's mind, but he did manage to prevent sanctions against the king. [30] Henry also employed Warelwast as a papal envoy during the Canterbury–York disputes over the primacy in the English Church, with visits in 1119, 1120, and possibly also in 1116. [1]

Work as bishop

One of the transept towers at Exeter Cathedral, which date from Warelwast's time ExeterCathedral-8.jpg
One of the transept towers at Exeter Cathedral, which date from Warelwast's time

As a bishop, Warelwast attended the Council of Reims in 1119 along with three other bishops from England, [31] as well as the Council of Rouen in 1118, a provincial synod for Normandy. [32] In his diocese of Exeter he began the construction of a new cathedral in about 1114; it was consecrated in 1133. The existing two towers in the transepts date from that period. [1] He also replaced the secular clergy staffing collegiate churches with regular canons: at Plympton in 1121 with canons from Aldgate in London, and in 1127 at the church in Launceston in Cornwall. [33] In addition he founded a house of regular canons at Bodmin. [3] Royal charters survive that granted several churches in Cornwall, Devon, and Exeter to Warelwast. [34] [lower-alpha 3]

Warelwast's relations with his cathedral chapter were good, and no disputes arose during his episcopate. [35] It was not until late in his bishopric that the diocese was split into multiple archdeaconries, which appears to have happened in 1133. [36] Warelwast instituted the two offices of treasurer and precentor for the cathedral chapter, [1] as well as the first sub-archdeacons, who were under the archdeacons. Sub-archdeacons are not attested again at Exeter until the episcopate of Bartholomew Iscanus, who was bishop from 1161 to 1184. [37] William of Malmesbury felt that during Warelwast's episcopate the cathedral chapter relaxed its communal living, which previously had been strong. It is likely that during Warelwast's episcopate the canons of the cathedral chapter quit living in a communal dormitory. [38]

Warelwast went blind in his later years, starting in about 1120, [1] which William of Malmesbury regarded as a fitting punishment for Warelwast's alleged attempts to remove his predecessor from office early. [3] He died about 26 September 1137, [24] and was buried in the priory at Plympton. [1] He may have resigned his see prior to his death. The 16th-century antiquary John Leland thought that Warelwast resigned his see before 1127, became a canon at Plympton, and died in 1127. Although Leland's year of death is incorrect, it is possible that Warelwast became a canon shortly before his death. [39] The Annales Plymptonienses records that Robert of Bath, the Bishop of Bath, gave Warelwast his last rites on 26 September 1137, and records that the dying bishop was made a member of the collegiate church at Plympton. [40] Warelwast's nephew Robert Warelwast succeeded as bishop at Exeter in 1138; Robert had been appointed archdeacon of Exeter by his uncle. [41]

The historian C. Warren Hollister described William Warelwast as a "canny and devoted royal servant". [30]

Notes

  1. ↑ Sometimes known as William de Warelwast. [1]
  2. ↑ His name originates probably from Véraval (Warelwast 1024), now sometimes misspelled Ver-à-Val, a hamlet of Autretot, which is about 3.1 mi (5.0 km) to the northwest of Yvetot in Normandy, now in the region Normandy in France.
  3. ↑ The churches are St Petrock's in Bodmin, St Stephen's in Launceston, St Stephen's in Perranzabuloe, St Stephen's in Probus, the church in Plympton, the church in Braunston, St Stephen's in Exeter, and the church in Colyton. [34]

Citations

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Barlow "Warelwast, William de" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography
  2. ↑ Blake "Bishop William Warelwast" Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association p. 15
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 Barlow English Church p. 80
  4. ↑ Blake "Bishop William Warelwast" Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association pp. 15–16
  5. ↑ Barlow William Rufus p. 96
  6. ↑ Blake "Bishop William Warelwast" Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association p. 16
  7. ↑ Poole Domesday Book to Magna Carta p. 174
  8. 1 2 Mason William II Rufus p. 143
  9. ↑ Vaughn Anselm of Bec p. 187
  10. 1 2 Barlow William Rufus pp. 342–343
  11. ↑ Barlow William Rufus p. 364
  12. ↑ Barlow William Rufus p. 395
  13. 1 2 Bartlett England Under the Norman and Angevin Kings p. 405
  14. 1 2 Mason William II Rufus pp. 175–178
  15. ↑ Poole Domesday Book to Magna Carta p. 177
  16. ↑ Barlow William Rufus p. 420
  17. ↑ Barlow English Church pp. 297–298
  18. ↑ Hollister Henry I p. 118
  19. ↑ Vaughn Anselm of Bec pp. 244–245
  20. ↑ Huscroft Ruling England pp. 131–132
  21. ↑ Hollister Henry I p. 198
  22. ↑ Cantor Church, Kingship, and Lay Investiture p. 264
  23. ↑ Brett English Church p. 108
  24. 1 2 Fryde, et al. Handbook of British Chronology p. 246
  25. ↑ Hollister Henry I pp. 209–210
  26. 1 2 Barlow English Church pp. 78–79
  27. ↑ Barlow English Church p. 302
  28. ↑ Blake "Bishop William Warelwast" Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association p. 23
  29. ↑ Newman Anglo-Norman Nobility pp. 183–185
  30. 1 2 Hollister Henry I pp. 240–241
  31. ↑ Barlow English Church p. 111
  32. ↑ Spear "Norman Empire" Journal of British Studies p. 3
  33. ↑ Burton Monastic and Religious Orders p. 47
  34. 1 2 Blake "Bishop William Warelwast" Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association p. 25
  35. ↑ Blake "Bishop William Warelwast" Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association p. 27
  36. ↑ Barlow English Church p. 49
  37. ↑ Blake "Development of the Chapter" Journal of Medieval History p. 3
  38. ↑ Blake "Development of the Chapter" Journal of Medieval History p. 6
  39. ↑ Blake "Bishop William Warelwast" Report and Transactions of the Devonshire Association p. 30
  40. ↑ Davis "Authorship of the Gesta Stephani" English Historical Review pp. 225 and 229
  41. ↑ Barlow English Church p. 249

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Henry I of England</span> King of England from 1100 to 1135

Henry I, also known as Henry Beauclerc, was King of England from 1100 to his death in 1135. He was the fourth son of William the Conqueror and was educated in Latin and the liberal arts. On William's death in 1087, Henry's elder brothers Robert Curthose and William Rufus inherited Normandy and England, respectively, but Henry was left landless. He purchased the County of Cotentin in western Normandy from Robert, but his brothers deposed him in 1091. He gradually rebuilt his power base in the Cotentin and allied himself with William Rufus against Robert.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William II of England</span> King of England from 1087 to 1100

William II was King of England from 26 September 1087 until his death in 1100, with powers over Normandy and influence in Scotland. He was less successful in extending control into Wales. The third son of William the Conqueror, he is commonly referred to as William Rufus, perhaps because of his ruddy appearance or, more likely, due to having red hair.

William de Corbeil or William of Corbeil was a medieval Archbishop of Canterbury. Very little is known of William's early life or his family, except that he was born at Corbeil, south of Paris, and that he had two brothers. Educated as a theologian, he taught briefly before serving the bishops of Durham and London as a clerk and subsequently becoming an Augustinian canon. William was elected to the See of Canterbury as a compromise candidate in 1123, the first canon to become an English archbishop. He succeeded Ralph d'Escures who had employed him as a chaplain.

Ralph d'Escures was a medieval abbot of Séez, bishop of Rochester, and then archbishop of Canterbury. He studied at the school at the Abbey of Bec. In 1079 he entered the abbey of St Martin at Séez and became abbot there in 1091. He was a friend of both Archbishop Anselm of Canterbury and Bishop Gundulf of Rochester, whose see, or bishopric, he took over on Gundulf's death.

Thurstan or Turstin of Bayeux was a medieval Archbishop of York, the son of a priest. He served kings William II and Henry I of England before his election to the see of York in 1114. Once elected, his consecration was delayed for five years while he fought attempts by the Archbishop of Canterbury to assert primacy over York. Eventually, he was consecrated by the pope instead and allowed to return to England. While archbishop, he secured two new suffragan bishops for his province. When Henry I died, Thurstan supported Henry's nephew Stephen of Blois as king. Thurstan also defended the northern part of England from invasion by the Scots, taking a leading part in organising the English forces at the Battle of the Standard (1138). Shortly before his death, Thurstan resigned from his see and took the habit of a Cluniac monk.

Ranulf Flambard was a medieval Norman Bishop of Durham and an influential government minister of King William Rufus of England. Ranulf was the son of a priest of Bayeux, Normandy, and his nickname Flambard means incendiary or torch-bearer, and may have referred to his personality. He started his career under King William I of England, probably in the compilation of the Domesday Book of 1086, as well as being the keeper of the king's seal. On the death of William I, Ranulf chose to serve the new king of England, William Rufus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William de St-Calais</span> 11th century Norman Bishop of Durham, England

William de St-Calais was a medieval Norman monk, abbot of the abbey of Saint-Vincent in Le Mans in Maine, who was nominated by King William I of England as Bishop of Durham in 1080. During his term as bishop, St-Calais replaced the canons of his cathedral chapter with monks, and began the construction of Durham Cathedral. In addition to his ecclesiastical duties, he served as a commissioner for the Domesday Book of 1086. He was also a councillor and advisor to both King William I and his son, King William II, known as William Rufus. Following William Rufus' accession to the throne in 1087, St-Calais is considered by scholars to have been the new king's chief advisor.

Gerard was Archbishop of York between 1100 and 1108 and Lord Chancellor of England from 1085 until 1092. A Norman, he was a member of the cathedral clergy at Rouen before becoming a royal clerk under King William I of England and subsequently his son King William II Rufus. Gerard was appointed Lord Chancellor by William I, and he continued in that office under Rufus, who rewarded him with the Bishopric of Hereford in 1096. Gerard may have been with the king's hunting party when William II was killed, as he is known to have witnessed the first charter issued by the new king, Henry I of England, within days of William's death.

Robert Bloet was Bishop of Lincoln 1093–1123 and Chancellor of England. Born into a noble Norman family, he became a royal clerk under King William I. Under William I's son and successor King William II, Bloet was first named chancellor then appointed to the See of Lincoln. Continuing to serve the king while bishop, Bloet remained a close royal councillor to William II's successor, King Henry I. He did much to embellish Lincoln Cathedral, and gave generously to his cathedral and other religious houses. He educated a number of noblemen, including illegitimate children of Henry I. He also was the patron of the medieval chronicler Henry of Huntingdon, and was an early patron of Gilbert of Sempringham, the founder of the Gilbertine monastic order.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas of Bayeux</span> Norman Archbishop of York

Thomas of Bayeux was Archbishop of York from 1070 until 1100. He was educated at Liège and became a royal chaplain to Duke William of Normandy, who later became King William I of England. After the Norman Conquest, the king nominated Thomas to succeed Ealdred as Archbishop of York. After Thomas' election, Lanfranc, Archbishop of Canterbury, demanded an oath from Thomas to obey him and any future Archbishops of Canterbury; this was part of Lanfranc's claim that Canterbury was the primary bishopric, and its holder the head of the English Church. Thomas countered that York had never made such an oath. As a result, Lanfranc refused to consecrate him. The King eventually persuaded Thomas to submit, but Thomas and Lanfranc continued to clash over ecclesiastical issues, including the primacy of Canterbury, which dioceses belonged to the province of York, and the question of how York's obedience to Canterbury would be expressed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hervey le Breton</span> 12th-century Bishop of Ely and Bangor

Hervey le Breton was a Breton cleric who became Bishop of Bangor in Wales and later Bishop of Ely in England. Appointed to Bangor by King William II of England, when the Normans were advancing into Wales, Hervey was unable to remain in his diocese when the Welsh began to drive the Normans back from their recent conquests. Hervey's behaviour towards the Welsh seems to have contributed to his expulsion from his see. Although the new king, Henry I wished to translate Hervey to the see of Lisieux in Normandy, it was unsuccessful.

Osbern FitzOsbern was a Norman churchman. He was a relative of King Edward the Confessor as well as being a royal chaplain. During Edward's reign he received the church at Bosham, near Chichester. He was present at the consecration of Westminster Abbey at Christmas 1065. He was a steward for King William I of England during his reign, as well as being a friend of the king. The story that he became William's chancellor is based entirely on a charter that modern historians have declared mostly spurious. He became Bishop of Exeter in 1072, and was consecrated at St. Paul's in London on 27 May 1072 by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Lanfranc.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ralph de Luffa</span> 11th and 12th-century Bishop of Chichester

Ralph de Luffa (or Ralph Luffa was an English bishop of Chichester, from 1091 to 1123. He built extensively on his cathedral as well as being praised by contemporary writers as an exemplary bishop. He took little part in the Investiture Crisis which took place in England during his episcopate. Although at one point he refused to allow his diocese to be taxed by King Henry I of England, Luffa remained on good terms with the two kings of England he served.

Robert de Limesey was a medieval cleric. He became Bishop of Chester in 1085, then his title changed to Bishop of Coventry when the see was moved in 1102.

Robert Warelwast was a medieval Bishop of Exeter.

Richard de Belmeis I was a medieval cleric, administrator, judge and politician. Beginning as a minor landowner and steward in Shropshire, he became Henry I's chief agent in the Welsh Marches and in 1108 was appointed Bishop of London. He founded St Osyth's Priory in Essex and was succeeded by a considerable dynasty of clerical politicians and landowners.

Events from the 1100s in England.

Walter or Gualterio of Albano was the cardinal-bishop of the Diocese of Albano in Italy from 1091 to 1101. He served as papal legate to England in May 1095, where he secured the recognition of Pope Urban II by King William II of England. He also brought a pallium, the symbol of an archbishop's authority, to the newly elected Archbishop of Canterbury, Anselm of Canterbury.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anselm of Canterbury</span> 11th and 12th-century Archbishop of Canterbury, theologian, and saint

Anselm of CanterburyOSB, also called Anselm of Aosta after his birthplace and Anselm of Bec after his monastery, was an Italian Benedictine monk, abbot, philosopher and theologian of the Catholic Church, who held the office of Archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 to 1109. After his death, he was canonized as a saint; his feast day is 21 April.

The Canterbury–York dispute was a long-running conflict between the archdioceses of Canterbury and York in medieval England. It began shortly after the Norman Conquest of England and dragged on for many years. The main point of the dispute was over whether Canterbury would have jurisdiction, or primacy, over York. A number of archbishops of Canterbury attempted to secure professions of obedience from successive archbishops of York, but in the end they were unsuccessful. York fought the primacy by appealing to the kings of England as well as the papacy. In 1127, the dispute over the primacy was settled mainly in York's favour, for they did not have to submit to Canterbury. Later aspects of the dispute dealt with concerns over status and prestige.

References

Catholic Church titles
Preceded by Bishop of Exeter
1107–1137		Succeeded by

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.