Deep Space 1

Last updated

Although ion engines had been developed at NASA since the late 1950s, with the exception of the SERT missions in the 1960s, the technology had not been demonstrated in flight on United States spacecraft, though hundreds of Hall-effect engines had been used on Soviet and Russian spacecraft. This lack of a performance history in space meant that despite the potential savings in propellant mass, the technology was considered too experimental to be used for high-cost missions. Furthermore, unforeseen side effects of ion propulsion might in some way interfere with typical scientific experiments, such as fields and particle measurements. Therefore, it was a primary mission of the Deep Space 1 demonstration to show long-duration use of an ion thruster on a scientific mission. [7]

The NASA Solar Technology Application Readiness (NSTAR) electrostatic ion thruster, developed at NASA Glenn, achieves a specific impulse of 1000–3000 seconds. This is an order of magnitude higher than traditional space propulsion methods, resulting in a mass savings of approximately half. This leads to much cheaper launch vehicles. Although the engine produces just 92 millinewtons (0.33  ozf ) thrust at maximal power (2,100 W on DS1), the craft achieved high speeds because ion engines thrust continuously for long periods. [7]

The next spacecraft to use NSTAR engines was Dawn , with three redundant units. [8]

Ion Engine Being Installed in High Vacuum Tank - GPN-2000-000597.jpg
Technicians installing ion engine #1 in the High Vacuum Tank in the Electric Propulsion Research Building, 1959
Deep Space 1 spacecraft.jpg
The fully assembled Deep Space 1
Deep Space 1 lifted.jpg
Deep Space 1 experimental solar-powered ion propulsion engine

Remote Agent

Remote Agent (RAX), remote intelligent self-repair software developed at NASA's Ames Research Center and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, was the first artificial-intelligence control system to control a spacecraft without human supervision. [9] Remote Agent successfully demonstrated the ability to plan onboard activities and correctly diagnose and respond to simulated faults in spacecraft components through its built-in REPL environment. [10] Autonomous control will enable future spacecraft to operate at greater distances from Earth and to carry out more sophisticated science-gathering activities in deep space. Components of the Remote Agent software have been used to support other NASA missions. Major components of Remote Agent were a robust planner (EUROPA), a plan-execution system (EXEC) and a model-based diagnostic system (Livingstone). [10] EUROPA was used as a ground-based planner for the Mars Exploration Rovers. EUROPA II was used to support the Phoenix Mars lander and the Mars Science Laboratory. Livingstone2 was flown as an experiment aboard Earth Observing-1 and on an F/A-18 Hornet at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center.

Beacon Monitor

Another method for reducing DSN burdens is the Beacon Monitor experiment. During the long cruise periods of the mission, spacecraft operations are essentially suspended. Instead of data, Deep Space 1 transmitted a carrier signal on a predetermined frequency. Without data decoding, the carrier could be detected by much simpler ground antennas and receivers. If DS1 detected an anomaly, it changed the carrier between four tones, based on urgency. Ground receivers then signal operators to divert DSN resources. This prevented skilled operators and expensive hardware from babysitting an unburdened mission operating nominally. A similar system was used on the New Horizons Pluto probe to keep costs down during its ten-year cruise from Jupiter to Pluto.

SDST

A Small Deep Space Transponder MSL-SDST.jpg
A Small Deep Space Transponder

The Small Deep Space Transponder (SDST) is a compact and lightweight radio-communications system. Aside from using miniaturized components, the SDST is capable of communicating over the Ka band. Because this band is higher in frequency than bands currently in use by deep-space missions, the same amount of data can be sent by smaller equipment in space and on the ground. Conversely, existing DSN antennas can split time among more missions. At the time of launch, the DSN had a small number of Ka receivers installed on an experimental basis; Ka operations and missions are increasing.

The SDST was later used on other space missions such as the Mars Science Laboratory (the Mars rover Curiosity ). [11]

PEPE

Once at a target, DS1 senses the particle environment with the PEPE (Plasma Experiment for Planetary Exploration) instrument. This instrument measured the flux of ions and electrons as a function of their energy and direction. The composition of the ions was determined by using a time-of-flight mass spectrometer.

MICAS

The MICAS (Miniature Integrated Camera And Spectrometer) instrument combined visible light imaging with infrared and ultraviolet spectroscopy to determine chemical composition. All channels share a 10 cm (3.9 in) telescope, which uses a silicon carbide mirror.

Both PEPE and MICAS were similar in capabilities to larger instruments or suites of instruments on other spacecraft. They were designed to be smaller and require lower power than those used on previous missions.

Mission overview

Deep Space 1 Launch.png
Launch of DS1 aboard a Delta II from Cape Canaveral SLC-17A
Animation of Deep Space 1 trajectory.gif
Animation of DS1's trajectory from 24 October 1998 to 31 December 2003
  Deep Space 1 ·   9969 Braille  ·   Earth  ·   19P/Borrelly

Prior to launch, Deep Space 1 was intended to visit comet 76P/West–Kohoutek–Ikemura and asteroid 3352 McAuliffe. [12] Because of the delayed launch, the targets were changed to asteroid 9969 Braille (at the time called 1992 KD) and comet 19P/Borrelly, with comet 107P/Wilson–Harrington being added following the early success of the mission. [13] It achieved an impaired flyby of Braille and, due to problems with the star tracker, abandoned targeting Wilson–Harrington in order to maintain its flyby of comet 19P/Borrelly, which was successful. [13] An August 2002 flyby of asteroid 1999 KK1 as another extended mission was considered, but ultimately was not advanced due to cost concerns. [14] [15] During the mission, high quality infrared spectra of Mars were also taken. [13] [16]

Results and achievements

Deep Space-1 as seen from Hale Telescope while at distance of 3.7 million km (2.3 million mi) Deep Space 1 spacecraft imaged by 5 meter Hale telescope on Palomar Mountain.png
Deep Space-1 as seen from Hale Telescope while at distance of 3.7 million km (2.3 million mi)

The ion propulsion engine initially failed after 4.5 minutes of operation. However, it was later restored to action and performed excellently. Early in the mission, material ejected during launch vehicle separation caused the closely spaced ion extraction grids to short-circuit. The contamination was eventually cleared, as the material was eroded by electrical arcing, sublimed by outgassing, or simply allowed to drift out. This was achieved by repeatedly restarting the engine in an engine repair mode, arcing across trapped material. [17]

It was thought that the ion engine exhaust might interfere with other spacecraft systems, such as radio communications or the science instruments. The PEPE detectors had a secondary function to monitor such effects from the engine. No interference was found although the flux of ions from the thruster prevented PEPE from observing ions below approximately 20 eV.

Another failure was the loss of the star tracker. The star tracker determines spacecraft orientation by comparing the star field to its internal charts. The mission was saved when the MICAS camera was reprogrammed to substitute for the star tracker. Although MICAS is more sensitive, its field-of-view is an order of magnitude smaller, creating a greater information processing burden. Ironically, the star tracker was an off-the-shelf component, expected to be highly reliable. [13]

Without a working star tracker, ion thrusting was temporarily suspended. The loss of thrust time forced the cancellation of a flyby past comet 107P/Wilson–Harrington.

The Autonav system required occasional manual corrections. Most problems were in identifying objects that were too dim, or were difficult to identify because of brighter objects causing diffraction spikes and reflections in the camera, causing Autonav to misidentify targets.

The Remote Agent system was presented with three simulated failures on the spacecraft and correctly handled each event.

  1. a failed electronics unit, which Remote Agent fixed by reactivating the unit.
  2. a failed sensor providing false information, which Remote Agent recognized as unreliable and therefore correctly ignored.
  3. an attitude control thruster (a small engine for controlling the spacecraft's orientation) stuck in the "off" position, which Remote Agent detected and compensated for by switching to a mode that did not rely on that thruster.

Overall this constituted a successful demonstration of fully autonomous planning, diagnosis, and recovery.

The MICAS instrument was a design success, but the ultraviolet channel failed due to an electrical fault. Later in the mission, after the star tracker failure, MICAS assumed this duty as well. This caused continual interruptions in its scientific use during the remaining mission, including the Comet Borrelly encounter. [18]

PIA01345.jpg
9969 Braille as imaged by DS1
Comet Borrelly Nucleus.jpg
Comet 19P/Borrelly imaged just 160 seconds before DS1's closest approach

The flyby of the asteroid 9969 Braille was only a partial success. Deep Space 1 was intended to perform the flyby at 56,000 km/h (35,000 mph) at only 240 m (790 ft) from the asteroid. Due to technical difficulties, including a software crash shortly before approach, the craft instead passed Braille at a distance of 26 km (16 mi). This, plus Braille's lower albedo, meant that the asteroid was not bright enough for the Autonav to focus the camera in the right direction, and the picture shoot was delayed by almost an hour. [13] The resulting pictures were disappointingly indistinct.

However, the flyby of Comet Borrelly was a great success and returned extremely detailed images of the comet's surface. Such images were of higher resolution than the only previous pictures of a comet -- Halley's Comet, taken by the Giotto spacecraft. The PEPE instrument reported that the comet's solar wind interaction was offset from the nucleus. This is believed to be due to emission of jets, which were not distributed evenly across the comet's surface.

Despite having no debris shields, the spacecraft survived the comet passage intact. Once again, the sparse comet jets did not appear to point towards the spacecraft. Deep Space 1 then entered its second extended mission phase, focused on retesting the spacecraft's hardware technologies. The focus of this mission phase was on the ion engine systems. The spacecraft eventually ran out of hydrazine fuel for its attitude control thrusters. The highly efficient ion thruster had a sufficient amount of propellant left to perform attitude control in addition to main propulsion, thus allowing the mission to continue. [18]

During late October and early November 1999, during the spacecraft's post-Braille encounter coast phase, Deep Space 1 observed Mars with its MICAS instrument. Although this was a very distant flyby, the instrument did succeed in taking multiple infrared spectra of the planet. [13] [16]

Current status

Deep Space 1 succeeded in its primary and secondary objectives, returning valuable science data and images. DS1's ion engines were shut down on 18 December 2001 at approximately 20:00:00 UTC, signaling the end of the mission. On-board communications were set to remain in active mode in case the craft should be needed in the future. However, attempts to resume contact in March 2002 were unsuccessful. [18] It remains within the Solar System, in orbit around the Sun. [2]

Statistics

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ion thruster</span> Spacecraft engine that generates thrust by generating a jet of ions

An ion thruster, ion drive, or ion engine is a form of electric propulsion used for spacecraft propulsion. An ion thruster creates a cloud of positive ions from a neutral gas by ionizing it to extract some electrons from its atoms. The ions are then accelerated using electricity to create thrust. Ion thrusters are categorized as either electrostatic or electromagnetic.

<i>Rosetta</i> (spacecraft) European orbiter sent to study a comet

Rosetta was a space probe built by the European Space Agency launched on 2 March 2004. Along with Philae, its lander module, Rosetta performed a detailed study of comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko (67P). During its journey to the comet, the spacecraft performed flybys of Earth, Mars, and the asteroids 21 Lutetia and 2867 Šteins. It was launched as the third cornerstone mission of the ESA's Horizon 2000 programme, after SOHO / Cluster and XMM-Newton.

<i>Nozomi</i> (spacecraft) Failed Mars orbiter

Nozomi was a Japanese Mars orbiter that failed to reach Mars due to electrical failure. It was constructed by the Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, University of Tokyo and launched on July 4, 1998, at 03:12 JST with an on-orbit dry mass of 258 kg and 282 kg of propellant. The Nozomi mission was terminated on December 31, 2003.

<i>Dawn</i> (spacecraft) NASA mission to study main-belt asteroids via a robotic probe (2007–18)

Dawn is a retired space probe that was launched by NASA in September 2007 with the mission of studying two of the three known protoplanets of the asteroid belt: Vesta and Ceres. In the fulfillment of that mission—the ninth in NASA's Discovery Program—Dawn entered orbit around Vesta on July 16, 2011, and completed a 14-month survey mission before leaving for Ceres in late 2012. It entered orbit around Ceres on March 6, 2015. In 2017, NASA announced that the planned nine-year mission would be extended until the probe's hydrazine fuel supply was depleted. On November 1, 2018, NASA announced that Dawn had depleted its hydrazine, and the mission was ended. The derelict probe remains in a stable orbit around Ceres.

<i>Deep Impact</i> (spacecraft) NASA space probe launched in 2005

Deep Impact was a NASA space probe launched from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station on January 12, 2005. It was designed to study the interior composition of the comet Tempel 1 (9P/Tempel), by releasing an impactor into the comet. At 05:52 UTC on July 4, 2005, the Impactor successfully collided with the comet's nucleus. The impact excavated debris from the interior of the nucleus, forming an impact crater. Photographs taken by the spacecraft showed the comet to be more dusty and less icy than had been expected. The impact generated an unexpectedly large and bright dust cloud, obscuring the view of the impact crater.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solar electric propulsion</span> High efficiency engine for space travel

Solar electric propulsion (SEP) refers to the combination of solar cells and electric thrusters to propel a spacecraft through outer space. This technology has been exploited in a variety of spacecraft designs by the European Space Agency (ESA), the JAXA, Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) and NASA. SEP has a significantly higher specific impulse than chemical rocket propulsion, thus requiring less propellant mass to be launched with a spacecraft. The technology has been evaluated for missions to Mars.

Vesta was a planned multiple-asteroid-flyby mission that the Soviet Union assessed in the 1980s.

Asteroid capture is an orbital insertion of an asteroid around a larger planetary body. When asteroids, small rocky bodies in space, are captured, they become natural satellites, specifically either an irregular moon if permanently captured, or a temporary satellite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mars flyby</span> Spacecraft maneuver

A Mars flyby is a movement of spacecraft passing in the vicinity of the planet Mars, but not entering orbit or landing on it. Uncrewed space probes have used this method to collect data on Mars, as opposed to orbiting or landing. A spacecraft designed for a flyby is also known as a "flyby bus" or "flyby spacecraft".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NEXT (ion thruster)</span> Space propulsion system, a gridded electrostatic ion thruster

The NASA Evolutionary Xenon Thruster (NEXT) project at Glenn Research Center is a gridded electrostatic ion thruster about three times as powerful as the NSTAR used on Dawn and Deep Space 1 spacecraft. It was used in DART, launched in 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Asteroid Redirect Mission</span> 2013–2017 proposed NASA space mission

The Asteroid Redirect Mission (ARM), also known as the Asteroid Retrieval and Utilization (ARU) mission and the Asteroid Initiative, was a space mission proposed by NASA in 2013; the mission was later cancelled. The Asteroid Retrieval Robotic Mission (ARRM) spacecraft would rendezvous with a large near-Earth asteroid and use robotic arms with anchoring grippers to retrieve a 4-meter boulder from the asteroid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">NASA Solar Technology Application Readiness</span> Space propulsion system, electrostatic gridded ion thruster

The NASA Solar Technology Application Readiness (NSTAR) is a type of spacecraft ion thruster called electrostatic ion thruster. It is a highly efficient low-thrust spacecraft propulsion running on electrical power generated by solar arrays. It uses high-voltage electrodes to accelerate ions with electrostatic forces.

<i>Psyche</i> (spacecraft) Reconnaissance mission of the main belt asteroid 16 Psyche

Psyche is a NASA Discovery Program space mission launched on October 13, 2023 to explore the origin of planetary cores by orbiting and studying the metallic asteroid 16 Psyche beginning in 2029. NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) manages the project.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lunar Polar Hydrogen Mapper</span> US Moon-orbiting ice-finding satellite

Lunar Polar Hydrogen Mapper, or LunaH-Map, was one of the 10 CubeSats launched with Artemis 1 on 16 November 2022. Along with Lunar IceCube and LunIR, LunaH-Map will help investigate the possible presence of water-ice on the Moon. Arizona State University began development of LunaH-Map after being awarded a contract by NASA in early 2015. The development team consists of about 20 professionals and students led by Craig Hardgrove, the principal investigator. The mission is a part of NASA's SIMPLEx program.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">DESTINY+</span> Planned asteroid flyby mission by JAXA, using solar electric propulsion

DESTINY+ (Demonstration and Experiment of Space Technology for INterplanetary voYage with Phaethon fLyby and dUst Science) is a planned mission to flyby the Geminids meteor shower parent body 3200 Phaethon, and sample dust originating from the "rock comet". The spacecraft is being developed by the Japanese space agency JAXA, and will demonstrate advanced technologies for future deep space exploration. As of 2023, DESTINY+ is planned to be launched in 2025.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">EQUULEUS</span> Japanese nanosatellite

EQUULEUS is a nanosatellite of the 6U CubeSat format that will measure the distribution of plasma that surrounds the Earth (plasmasphere) to help scientists understand the radiation environment in that region. It will also demonstrate low-thrust trajectory control techniques, such as multiple lunar flybys, within the Earth-Moon region using water steam as propellant. The spacecraft was designed and developed jointly by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) and the University of Tokyo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Power and Propulsion Element</span> Power and propulsion module for the Gateway space station

The Power and Propulsion Element (PPE), previously known as the Asteroid Redirect Vehicle propulsion system, is a planned solar electric ion propulsion module being developed by Maxar Technologies for NASA. It is one of the major components of the Lunar Gateway. The PPE will allow access to the entire lunar surface and a wide range of lunar orbits and double as a space tug for visiting craft.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Deep Space 1 Asteroid Flyby" (PDF) (Press kit). NASA. 26 July 1999. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 November 2001. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "Deep Space 1". National Space Science Data Center . NASA. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  3. Siddiqi, Asif A. (2018). Beyond Earth: A Chronicle of Deep Space Exploration, 1958–2016 (PDF). NASA History Series (2nd ed.). NASA. p. 2. ISBN   978-1-62683-042-4. LCCN   2017059404. SP-2018-4041. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 April 2019.
  4. "Advanced Technologies". NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  5. Bhaskaran, S.; et al. (2000). The Deep Space 1 Autonomous Navigation System: A Post-Flight Analysis. AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference. 14–17 August 2000. Denver, Colorado. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.457.7850 . doi:10.2514/6.2000-3935. AIAA-2000-3935.
  6. Murphy, David M. (2000). The Scarlet Solar Array: Technology Validation and Flight Results (PDF). Deep Space 1 Technology Validation Symposium. 8–9 February 2000. Pasadena, California. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 October 2011.
  7. 1 2 Rayman, Marc D.; Chadbourne, Pamela A.; Culwell, Jeffery S.; Williams, Steven N. (August–November 1999). "Mision Design for Deep Space 1: A Low-thrust Technology Validation Mission" (PDF). Acta Astronautica. 45 (4–9): 381–388. Bibcode:1999AcAau..45..381R. doi:10.1016/S0094-5765(99)00157-5. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2015.
  8. "Dawn: Spacecraft". NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  9. "Remote Agent". NASA. Archived from the original on 13 April 2010. Retrieved 22 April 2009.
  10. 1 2 Garret, Ron (14 February 2012). The Remote Agent Experiment: Debugging Code from 60 Million Miles Away. YouTube.com. Google Tech Talks. Archived from the original on 11 December 2021. Slides.
  11. Makovsky, Andre; Ilott, Peter; Taylor, Jim (November 2009). "Mars Science Laboratory Telecommunications System Design" (PDF). Design and Performance Summary Series. NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 May 2010.
  12. "Comet Space Missions". SEDS.org. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Rayman, Marc D.; Varghese, Philip (March–June 2001). "The Deep Space 1 Extended Mission" (PDF). Acta Astronautica. 48 (5–12): 693–705. Bibcode:2001AcAau..48..693R. doi:10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00044-3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 May 2009.
  14. Schactman, Noah (18 December 2001). "End of the Line for NASA Probe". Wired . Archived from the original on 17 June 2008.
  15. Rayman, Marc (18 December 2001). "Mission Update". Dr. Marc Rayman's Mission Log. NASA/Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Archived from the original on 13 August 2009.
  16. 1 2 "Deep Space 1: Mission Information". NASA. 29 September 2003. Retrieved 20 November 2016.
  17. Rayman, Marc D.; Varghese, Philip; Lehman, David H.; Livesay, Leslie L. (July–November 2000). "Results from the Deep Space 1 Technology Validation Mission" (PDF). Acta Astronautica. 47 (2–9): 475–487. Bibcode:2000AcAau..47..475R. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.504.9572 . doi:10.1016/S0094-5765(00)00087-4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 15 April 2012.
  18. 1 2 3 Rayman, Marc D. (2003). "The Successful Conclusion of the Deep Space 1 Mission: Important Results without a Flashy Title" (PDF). Space Technology. 23 (2): 185–196. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 November 2016.
Deep Space 1
Deep Space 1 clean (PIA04242).png
Artist concept of Deep Space 1
Mission typeTechnology demonstrator
Operator NASA  / JPL
COSPAR ID 1998-061A OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg
SATCAT no. 25508
Website http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/deep-space-1-ds1/
Mission duration3 years, 1 month and 24 days
Spacecraft properties
Manufacturer Orbital Sciences Corporation
Launch mass486 kg (1,071 lb) [1]
Dry mass373 kg (822 lb) [1]
Dimensions2.1 × 11.8 × 2.5 m (6.9 × 38.6 × 8.2 ft)
Power2,500 watts [1]
Start of mission
Launch date24 October 1998, 12:08 (1998-10-24UTC12:08) UTC [2]
Rocket Delta II 7326 [1]
Launch site Cape Canaveral SLC-17A [1]
End of mission
DisposalDecommissioned
Deactivated18 December 2001, 20:00 (2001-12-18UTC21) UTC [2]
Flyby of 9969 Braille
Closest approach29 July 1999, 04:46 UTC [2]
Distance26 km (16 mi)