Internet censorship in the Republic of Ireland

Last updated

Internet censorship in Ireland is a controversial issue with the introduction of a graduated response policy in 2008 followed by an effort to block certain file sharing sites starting in February 2009. Beyond these issues there are no government restrictions on access to the Internet or credible reports that the government monitored e-mail or Internet chat rooms. Individuals and groups could engage in the expression of views via the Internet, including by e-mail. Irish law provides for freedom of speech including for members of the press, and the government generally respects these rights in practice. An independent press, an effective judiciary, and a functioning democratic political system act jointly to ensure freedom of speech and of the press. [1]

Contents

History

In 1999, Connect.ie, a Dublin-based Internet Service Provider, was subjected to a denial of service attack by hackers believed to be acting at the behest and with support from a faction of the Indonesian military. At the time Connect.ie was hosting the .tp toplevel domain on behalf of people in East Timor during the Indonesian occupation of East Timor, the toplevel domain was temporarily disabled during the attack. [2] [3] [4]

In 2006 the Irish domain registry IEDR was criticised for maintaining a domain name blacklist including common words like porn. [5] [6]

Graduated response

A graduated response policy is currently being encouraged by the Irish Recorded Music Association who are urging ISPs in Ireland to send warning letters and blocking content which it believes is damaging the music industry. [7] [8] According to a report published by solicitors McCann Fitzgerald this is the first implementation in Europe of the three strikes system that record companies are lobbying to bring on throughout: [9]

  1. Once notified of the IP addresses, Eircom will first inform the broadband subscriber that their IP address has been used in connection with illegal activities. At this stage, subscribers who claim they are the victim of "wi-fi hijacking" (where someone else uses their wi-fi network to access the Internet) will have the opportunity to clarify their situation and upgrade the security of their connection if required.
  2. If a subscriber is then found to still be infringing, they will be warned that failure to cease infringing activities will result in their being disconnected by Eircom.
  3. Continued failure to comply and cease infringing activity will result in the subscriber being disconnected.

Blocking access to file sharing sites

IRMA who represent EMI, Sony Music Entertainment, Warner Bros. and Universal are seeking that Eircom along with all other major Irish ISPs block access to file sharing sites such as The Pirate Bay and Mininova. [10] [11]

In contrast to similar drives in countries including Australia this is being driven entirely by commercial rather than political interests such as child safety. [12]

According to the Internet Service Providers Association of Ireland:

"Internet Service Providers in Ireland have recently received letters threatening legal action from solicitors representing four major music recording companies. This legal action is spurious and there is no evidence of wrong-doing by Internet Service Providers. These actions could impact on user privacy, damage the development of new internet services, and hurt Ireland's standing as an eCommerce hub." [13]

Letters explaining the plans were delivered to Irish ISPs including Blacknight and Eircom on 13 February 2009, calling for them to participate in the block or face possible legal action. [12] [14]

Eircom have announced they will implement the block on The Pirate Bay from 1 September 2009. Other ISPs, including UPC Ireland and BT Ireland are resisting pressure from IRMA. [15]

Grassroots campaigns including "Blackout Ireland" and "Boycott Eircom" have been established to protest the censorship. [16]

Talks on blocking Internet access

In April 2010 the Irish government was revealed to have held discussions to introduce Internet filtering. Documents obtained under Freedom of information legislation by Digital Rights Ireland mention a meeting between the Department of Justice and Law Reform and Vodafone, an email from Hutchison 3G listing filtering technologies it uses, and a meeting between the Office of Internet Safety and the Garda Síochána on the proposed introduction of Internet blocking. [17] In July 2013 the ISP Association of Ireland issued a press statement [18] stating ISP's "should not be made censors" in response to renewed calls for blocking and filtering by Irish ISPs.

See also

Related Research Articles

Telecommunications in Ireland operate in a regulated competitive market that provides customers with a wide array of advanced digital services. This article explores Ireland's telecommunications infrastructure including: fixed and mobile networks, The voice, data and Internet services, cable television, developments in next-generation networks and broadcast networks for radio and television.

The Irish Recorded Music Association (IRMA) is a non-profit association set up in 1999 to promote certain interests of the music industry in Ireland. It is particularly active in addressing copyright issues, and it compiles the official music charts for Ireland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eir (telecommunications)</span> Irish telecommunication company

Eircom Limited, trading as Eir, is a large fixed, mobile and broadband telecommunications company in Ireland. The now privatised company, which is currently incorporated in Jersey, traces its origins to the Ireland's former state-owned monopoly telecommunication provider Telecom Éireann and its predecessors, P&T and before the foundation of the state, the telecommunications division of the GPO. It remains the largest telecommunications operator in Ireland and has overseas operations focused on the business and corporate telecom markets in the United Kingdom. The company was in majority state ownership until 1999, when it was privatised through a floatation on the Irish and New York Stock Exchanges.

Deep packet inspection (DPI) is a type of data processing that inspects in detail the data being sent over a computer network, and may take actions such as alerting, blocking, re-routing, or logging it accordingly. Deep packet inspection is often used for baselining application behavior, analyzing network usage, troubleshooting network performance, ensuring that data is in the correct format, checking for malicious code, eavesdropping, and internet censorship, among other purposes. There are multiple headers for IP packets; network equipment only needs to use the first of these for normal operation, but use of the second header is normally considered to be shallow packet inspection despite this definition.

Internet censorship in Australia is enforced by both the country's criminal law as well as voluntarily enacted by internet service providers. The Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) has the power to enforce content restrictions on Internet content hosted within Australia, and maintain a blocklist of overseas websites which is then provided for use in filtering software. The restrictions focus primarily on child pornography, sexual violence, and other illegal activities, compiled as a result of a consumer complaints process.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship in India</span> Overview of Internet censorship in India

Internet censorship in India is done by both central and state governments. DNS filtering and educating service users in suggested usages is an active strategy and government policy to regulate and block access to Internet content on a large scale. Measures for removing content at the request of content creators through court orders have also become more common in recent years. Initiating a mass surveillance government project like Golden Shield Project is an alternative that has been discussed over the years by government bodies.

Internet censorship in the United Kingdom is conducted under a variety of laws, judicial processes, administrative regulations and voluntary arrangements. It is achieved by blocking access to sites as well as the use of laws that criminalise publication or possession of certain types of material. These include English defamation law, the Copyright law of the United Kingdom, regulations against incitement to terrorism and child pornography.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet in the Republic of Ireland</span>

The internet is an important contributor to Ireland's economy and education. The telecommunications infrastructure in Ireland provides Internet access to businesses and home users in various forms, including fibre, cable, DSL, wireless, Fixed Wireless and mobile. In 2019, 91% of households have access to the Internet in Ireland at home, with 88% of individuals reporting that they had used the internet in the three months prior to interview.

The Internet in Norway is available through Fiber or Mobile. The country code top level domain is .no.

The Internet in Sweden was used by 94.0% of the population, the fourth highest usage rate in the world, behind only the Falkland Islands (96.9%), Iceland (96.0%), and Norway (95%) in 2015. Sweden ranks 18th and 5th highest in the world in terms of the percentage of its fixed and wireless broadband subscriptions. It has the second fastest average internet connection speed in the world.

Censorship in Denmark has been prohibited since 1849 by the Constitution:

§ 77: Any person shall be at liberty to publish his ideas in print, in writing, and in speech, subject to his being held responsible in a court of law. Censorship and other preventive measures shall never again be introduced.

Hotline.ie is recognised as the established illegal internet content reporting service in Ireland, especially for reporting child sexual abuse images. The service provides a secure and confidential environment where the public can anonymously report material they suspect to be illegal which they may encounter when using the Internet. The reports can be made using the secure https section within the website. Alternatively, reports can be made by email or by phone.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet Watch Foundation</span> Registered charity in Cambridge, England

The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) is a global registered charity based in Cambridge, England. It states that its remit is "to minimise the availability of online sexual abuse content, specifically child sexual abuse images and videos hosted anywhere in the world and non-photographic child sexual abuse images hosted in the UK." Content inciting racial hatred was removed from the IWF's remit after a police website was set up for the purpose in April 2011. The IWF used to also take reports of criminally obscene adult content hosted in the UK. This was removed from the IWF's remit in 2017. As part of its function, the IWF says that it will "supply partners with an accurate and current URL list to enable blocking of child sexual abuse content". It has "an excellent and responsive national Hotline reporting service" for receiving reports from the public. In addition to receiving referrals from the public, its agents also proactively search the open web and deep web to identify child sexual abuse images and videos. It can then ask service providers to take down the websites containing the images or to block them if they fall outside UK jurisdiction.

Censorship in Finland refers to government policies in controlling and regulating certain information.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Countries blocking access to The Pirate Bay</span>

This is a list on countries where at least one internet service provider (ISP) formerly or currently censors the popular file sharing website The Pirate Bay (TPB).

The precise number of websites blocked in the United Kingdom is unknown. Blocking techniques vary from one Internet service provider (ISP) to another with some sites or specific URLs blocked by some ISPs and not others. Websites and services are blocked using a combination of data feeds from private content-control technology companies, government agencies, NGOs, court orders in conjunction with the service administrators who may or may not have the power to unblock, additionally block, appeal or recategorise blocked content.

The child abuse image content list is a list of URLs and image hashes provided by the Internet Watch Foundation to its partners to enable the blocking of child pornography & criminally obscene adult content in the UK and by major international technology companies.

Internet censorship in Switzerland is regulated by the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland on a case by case basis. Internet services provided by the registered with BAKOM Internet service providers (ISPs) are subject to a "voluntary recommendation" by the Federal Supreme Court of Switzerland, which requires blocking of websites just after 18 December 2007. As of October 2015, this might change soon and additional topics like Online gambling are on the focus now.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe</span>

This list of Internet censorship and surveillance in Europe provides information on the types and levels of Internet censorship and surveillance that is occurring in countries in Europe.

References

  1. ↑ "Ireland: Freedom of Speech and Press and Internet Freedom", Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2011, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, U.S. Department of State
  2. ↑ "Repressive nations now crossing cyberborders". Tribune News Service. 3 February 1999. Retrieved 17 March 2009.[ dead link ]
  3. ↑ "Virtual country 'nuked' in cyberwar: Hackers bring down East Timor domain; Indonesian government blamed", MSNBC, 28 January 1999, retrieved 3 March 2013
  4. ↑ "Internet openness cuts both ways", Dan Gillmor, San Jose Mercury News, 30 January 1999, retrieved 3 March 2013
  5. ↑ "The censor strikes back". Independent.ie. 16 October 2006. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  6. ↑ Leahy, Enda (22 October 2006). "Censorship shock: no porn allowed on net". Sunday Times. London. Archived from the original on 30 April 2015. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  7. ↑ Marie Boran (18 February 2009). "IRMA's Pirate Bay clause won't float, say ISPs". SiliconRepublic. Archived from the original on 25 March 2009. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  8. ↑ "Record firms seek to ban illegal downloads". RTÉ News. 10 March 2009. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  9. ↑ Smith, Grace; Rebecca O'Kelly (February 2009). "3 Strikes and You're Out for Illegal Downloaders" (PDF). McCann Fitzgerald Solicitors. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 October 2013. Retrieved 4 March 2013.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. ↑ Adrian Weckler (22 February 2009). "Music-swapping sites to be blocked by internet providers". Sunday Business Post Online. Archived from the original on 14 April 2013. Retrieved 3 March 2013.
  11. ↑ Robert Munro (3 February 2009). "Irish ISPs to block file-sharing sites". IT Examiner. Archived from the original on 24 February 2009. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  12. 1 2 Jacqui Cheng (23 February 2009). "Record industry talks Irish ISP into blocking P2P sites". Ars Technica. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  13. ↑ Paul Durrant (13 March 2009). "ISPAI position statement" (PDF). Internet Service Providers Association (ISPAI). Archived from the original (PDF) on 25 March 2009. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  14. ↑ Hellen Sheehy of Sheehy Donnelly Solicitors (13 February 2009). "Original IRMA letter to Blacknight" (PDF). Blacknight. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  15. ↑ "Eircom to block internet access to Pirate Bay as other firms refuse". The Irish Times. 20 August 2009. Retrieved 25 August 2009.
  16. ↑ "Net campaign urges action over move to block websites". The Irish Times. 4 March 2009. Retrieved 16 March 2009.
  17. ↑ Putting up barriers to a free and open internet, Karlin Lillington, The Irish Times , 16 April 2010
  18. ↑ ISP Association Responds to Porn Filtering Debacle, Michele Neylon, Technology.ie, 26 July 2013
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.