North Carolina's congressional districts

Last updated

District lines to be used from 2025 North Carolina Congressional Districts, 119th Congress.svg
District lines to be used from 2025
District lines for the 2022 elections North Carolina Congressional Districts since 2023 (Special Masters Remedial Plan).svg
District lines for the 2022 elections

North Carolina is currently divided into 14 congressional districts, each represented by a member of the United States House of Representatives. After the 2000 census, the number of North Carolina's seats was increased from 12 to 13 due to the state's increase in population. In the 2022 elections, per the 2020 United States census, North Carolina gained one new congressional seat for a total of 14. [1]

Contents

Current districts and representatives

List of members of the United States House delegation from North Carolina, their terms, their district boundaries, and the district political ratings according to the CPVI. The delegation has a total of 14 members, with 7 Republicans, and 7 Democrats.

Current U.S. representatives from North Carolina
DistrictMember
(Residence) [2]
PartyIncumbent since CPVI
(2022) [3]
District map
1st Portrait of Congressman Don Davis.jpg
Don Davis
(Snow Hill)
DemocraticJanuary 3, 2023D+2 North Carolina's 1st congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
2nd Deborah Ross 117th U.S Congress.jpg
Deborah Ross
(Raleigh)
DemocraticJanuary 3, 2021D+12 North Carolina's 2nd congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
3rd Rep. Greg Murphy 116th Congress Portrait.jpg
Greg Murphy
(Greenville)
RepublicanSeptember 17, 2019R+15 North Carolina's 3rd congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
4th U.S. Rep. Valerie Foushee - 118th Congress.jpg
Valerie Foushee
(Hillsborough)
DemocraticJanuary 3, 2023D+16 North Carolina's 4th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
5th Virginia Foxx official photo.jpg
Virginia Foxx
(Banner Elk)
RepublicanJanuary 3, 2005R+13 North Carolina's 5th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
6th Kathy Manning 117th U.S Congress.jpg
Kathy Manning
(Greensboro)
DemocraticJanuary 3, 2021D+4 North Carolina's 6th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
7th David Rouzer official photo.jpg
David Rouzer
(Wilmington)
RepublicanJanuary 3, 2015R+8 North Carolina's 7th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
8th Representative Dan Bishop of NC (cropped).jpg
Dan Bishop
(Charlotte)
RepublicanSeptember 17, 2019R+20 North Carolina's 8th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
9th Richard Hudson official congressional photo.jpg
Richard Hudson
(Southern Pines)
RepublicanJanuary 3, 2013R+6 North Carolina's 9th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
10th Patrick McHenry, official portrait, 116th Congress (long cropped).jpg
Patrick McHenry
(Lake Norman of Catawba)
RepublicanJanuary 3, 2005R+22 North Carolina's 10th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
11th Rep. Chuck Edwards official photo, 118th Congress.jpg
Chuck Edwards
(Flat Rock)
RepublicanJanuary 3, 2023R+8 North Carolina's 11th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
12th Alma Adams official portrait (cropped 2).jpg
Alma Adams
(Charlotte)
DemocraticNovember 4, 2014D+13 North Carolina's 12th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
13th Rep. Wiley Nickel, 118th Congress (1).jpg
Wiley Nickel
(Cary)
DemocraticJanuary 3, 2023R+2 North Carolina's 13th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg
14th Rep. Jeff Jackson - 118th Congress.jpg
Jeff Jackson
(Charlotte)
DemocraticJanuary 3, 2023D+6 North Carolina's 14th congressional district (2023-2025) (new version).svg

1981 redistricting

In 1981, the North Carolina General Assembly proposed a congressional redistricting plan that split Moore County between two districts, the first time a county in North Carolina had ever been thus divided. The Attorney General of North Carolina recommended revising the plan. [4]

Constitutionality of the 1990 redistricting

After the 1990 census, the US Department of Justice directed North Carolina under VRA preclearance to submit a map with two majority-minority districts. The resultant map with two such congressional districts, the 1st and 12th, was the subject of lawsuits by voters who claimed that it was an illegal racial gerrymander. A three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina dismissed the suit, which was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. On June 28, 1993, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Shaw v. Reno , found that the 12th congressional district was an unlawful racial gerrymander. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's opinion found that if a district's shape, like the 12th's, was "so bizarre on its face that it is 'unexplainable on grounds other than race'", that it would be subject to strict scrutiny as a racial gerrymander, and remanded the case to the Eastern District of North Carolina.

On August 22, 1994, the Eastern District of North Carolina on remand in Shaw v. Hunt found that the 12th congressional district was a racial gerrymander (as the U.S. Supreme Court had directed), but ruled that the map satisfied strict scrutiny due to the compelling interest of compliance with the Voting Rights Act and increasing black political power. [5] This was again appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which reversed the Eastern District of North Carolina on June 13, 1996, and found that the North Carolina plan violated the Equal Protection Clause and that the 12th congressional district did not satisfy a compelling interest. [6]

Constitutionality of the 1997 redistricting

North Carolina drew a new map following Shaw v. Hunt, and the new maps were challenged in turn. A three-judge panel of the Eastern District of North Carolina granted summary judgment that the new boundaries were an illegal racial gerrymander. [7] This was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in Hunt v. Cromartie on May 17, 1999, unanimously ruled that the Eastern District of North Carolina was in error to grant summary judgment and remanded the case for the court to hold a trial.

After the ensuing trial, the Eastern District of North Carolina ruled that the 12th district was an illegal racial gerrymander on March 7, 2000. [8] This was again appealed, now as Easley v. Cromartie . The U.S. Supreme Court on April 18, 2001, reversed the Eastern District of North Carolina and ruled that the 12th district boundaries were not racially based but was a partisan gerrymander. They said this was a political question that the courts should not rule upon. Justice O'Connor, the author of Shaw v. Hunt, was the swing justice who switched sides to uphold the district boundaries.

Constitutionality of the 2010 redistricting

In February 2016, a three-judge panel of U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and Middle District of North Carolina judges ruled that the 1st and 12th congressional districts' boundaries were unconstitutional and required new maps to be drawn by the legislature to be used for the 2016 election. [9] On 22 May 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court, in Cooper v. Harris , agreed that the 1st and 12th congressional district boundaries were unlawful racial gerrymanders, the latest in a series of cases dating back to 1993 by different parties challenging various configurations of those districts since their first creation. [10] [11]

In January 2018 a federal court struck down North Carolina's congressional map, declaring it unconstitutionally gerrymandered to favor Republican candidates. The court ordered that the General Assembly must redraw the district maps prior to the 2018 elections. [12] However, the U.S. Supreme Court stayed the federal court order pending review, [13] and in June 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Rucho v. Common Cause , by a 54 vote, that partisan gerrymandering is a "political question" that the federal courts have no place to rule on. [14] [15]

Constitutionality of the 2017 redistricting

This image shows the previous congressional districts, which were struck down on January 9, 2018 by a federal court. Due to a stay on the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, these districts were used in the 2018 midterm elections pending appeal. In 2020 a new set of districts were used. Those districts officially went into effect on January 3, 2021. NorthCarolina2016USHouseDistricts.png
This image shows the previous congressional districts, which were struck down on January 9, 2018 by a federal court. Due to a stay on the decision by the U.S. Supreme Court, these districts were used in the 2018 midterm elections pending appeal. In 2020 a new set of districts were used. Those districts officially went into effect on January 3, 2021.

On September 3, 2019, a three-judge panel in a 357-page ruling unanimously struck down the Republican-led state legislature drawn 2017 enacted maps, [17] which were drawn to replace the 2011 maps which were also ruled unconstitutional and thrown out on racial grounds. [18] The court ruled that the state House and state Senate districts maps were such an extreme partisan gerrymander that they violated the state constitution. In the ruling the state legislature was ordered by the court to immediately start drawing new maps; the court demanded that they be drawn based on criteria like population, contiguity, and county lines. Districts had to be drawn without "partisan considerations and election results data," and done so in plain view, a departure from the closed-door processes the ruling eschews. "At a minimum, that would require all map drawing to occur at public hearings, with any relevant computer screen visible to legislators and public observers." The judges said the new maps had to be completed in two weeks; they also said they reserved the right to move the 2020 primary election if needed. [19]

In October 2019, a panel of three judges ruled that the map was an unfair partisan gerrymander and had to be redrawn. [20] On November 15, 2019, the General Assembly passed a bill that drew new districts that were used for the 2020 elections. The 2nd and 6th congressional districts were drawn to be more favorable to Democrats under the new proposal. [21] On December 2, 2019, a three-judge panel ruled that newly Republican-drawn congressional district maps completed in November 2019 would stand for federal elections in 2020. The maps allowed to stay in place would only be used once. After the 2020 census, the congressional districts would have to be redrawn again. [22]

Constitutionality of the 2020 redistricting

North Carolina 2021 Enacted Congressional Districts, 118th Congress (S.L. 2021-174) with Insets.pdf
North Carolina 2022 Enacted Congressional Districts, 118th Congress (S.L. 2022-3).svg
Congressional district plans passed by the North Carolina General Assembly on November 4, 2021 (top) and February 17, 2022 (bottom), both of which have been struck down by state courts.

On February 4, 2022, the North Carolina Supreme Court struck down the congressional and state legislative district maps drawn by the GOP-controlled General Assembly as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander in a 4–3 ruling, after a testimony had shown that Republicans were likely to win 10 out of 14 U.S. House seats under the proposed map, an increase from the eight out of 13 that they won in the 2020 elections. New maps, which were ordered to be fair in partisan composition, had to be drawn by the General Assembly within two weeks, under state law. [23]

On February 23, 2022, a panel of three former judges chosen by the Wake County Superior Court drew and approved a new remedial congressional map after the court, earlier that day, struck down the congressional district maps passed by the General Assembly on February 17, 2022, as not meeting standards of partisan fairness. The new maps, which were upheld by the North Carolina Supreme Court later in the night, would apply for the 2022 elections. The General Assembly would then be able to redraw new congressional maps for use in 2024 and subsequent elections until new maps will have to be redrawn for 2032. [24] [25]

Later developments

On April 28, 2023, the North Carolina Supreme Court—after it flipped Republican in the 2022 elections—overturned the same ruling in a 5–2 decision, which cleared the way for gerrymandering in the next redistricting cycle. [26] [27] On October 25, 2023, new maps were approved by the General Assembly. All three new maps heavily favor the GOP, with allegations of racial bias made against the maps as well. Compared to the congressional map used in the 2022 elections, the GOP is expected to at least gain three seats in the House. [28] [29] [30]

In December 2023, two lawsuit were filed in the Middle District of North Carolina, with the first challenging the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 14th congressional districts in the map, [31] [32] and the second, challenging multiple specific districts in the congressional and state legislative district maps, as racial gerrymanders. [33] [34] [35] Both lawsuits were consolidated together in March 2024. [36] [37]

Historical and present district boundaries

Table of United States congressional district boundary maps in the State of North Carolina, presented chronologically. [38] All redistricting events that took place in North Carolina between 1973 and 2013 are shown, congressional composition is listed on the right.

YearStatewide mapCharlotte highlightCongressional composition
1973–1983 United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina, 1973 - 1982.tif United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina (metro highlight), 1973 - 1982.tif 1973–1975: 7 Democrats, 4 Republicans

1975–1977: 9 Democrats, 2 Republicans

1977–1979: 9 Democrats, 2 Republicans

1979–1981: 9 Democrats, 2 Republicans

1981–1983: 7 Democrats, 4 Republicans

1983–1993 United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina, 1983 - 1992.tif United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina (metro highlight), 1983 - 1992.tif 1983–1985: 9 Democrats, 2 Republicans

1985–1987: 6 Democrats, 5 Republicans

1987–1989: 8 Democrats, 3 Republicans

1989–1991: 8 Democrats, 3 Republicans

1991–1993: 7 Democrats, 4 Republicans

1993–1999 United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina, 1993 - 1998.tif United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina (metro highlight), 1993 - 1998.tif 1993–1995: 8 Democrats, 4 Republicans

1995–1997: 4 Democrats, 8 Republicans

1997–1999: 6 Democrats, 6 Republicans

1999–2001 United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina, 1999 - 2000.tif United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina (metro highlight), 1999 - 2000.tif 1999–2001: 5 Democrats, 7 Republicans
2001–2003 United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina, 2001 - 2002.tif United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina (metro highlight), 2001 - 2002.tif 2001–2003: 5 Democrats, 7 Republicans
2003–2013 United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina, 2003 - 2013.tif United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina (metro highlight), 2003 - 2013.tif 2003–2005: 6 Democrats, 7 Republicans

2005–2007: 6 Democrats, 7 Republicans

2007–2009: 7 Democrats, 6 Republicans

2009–2011: 8 Democrats, 5 Republicans

2011–2013: 7 Democrats, 6 Republicans

2013–2017 United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina, since 2013.tif United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina (metro highlight), since 2013.tif 2013–2015: 4 Democrats, 9 Republicans

2015–2017: 3 Democrats, 10 Republicans

2017–2021 NorthCarolina2016USHouseDistricts.png 2017–2019: 3 Democrats, 10 Republicans

2019–2021: 3 Democrats, 10 Republicans

2021–2023 United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina, 2021 - 2023.tif United States Congressional Districts in North Carolina (metro highlight), 2021 - 2023.tif 2021–2023: 5 Democrats, 8 Republicans
2023–2025 North Carolina Congressional Districts since 2023 (Special Masters Remedial Plan).svg
North Carolina Congressional Districts since 2023 (Special Masters Remedial Plan).svg
2023–2025: 7 Democrats, 7 Republicans
From 2025 North Carolina Congressional Districts, 119th Congress.svg

See also

Related Research Articles

Hunt v. Cromartie, 526 U.S. 541 (1999), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding North Carolina's 12th congressional district. In an earlier case, Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), the Supreme Court ruled that the 12th district of North Carolina as drawn was unconstitutional because it was created for the purpose of placing African Americans in one district, thereby constituting illegal racial gerrymandering. The Court ordered the state of North Carolina to redraw the boundaries of the district.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ohio's congressional districts</span> Congressional districts in the U.S. state of Ohio

Ohio is divided into 15 congressional districts, each represented by a member of the United States House of Representatives. After the 2010 census, Ohio lost two House seats due to slow population growth compared to the national average, and a new map was signed into law on September 26, 2011. Starting in the 2022 midterms, per the 2020 United States census, Ohio will lose a congressional seat.

Ohio's 3rd congressional district is located entirely in Franklin County and includes most of the city of Columbus. The current district lines were drawn in 2022, following the redistricting based on the 2020 census. It is currently represented by Democrat Joyce Beatty.

<i>Shaw v. Reno</i> 1993 US Supreme Court gerrymandering case

Shaw v. Reno, 509 U.S. 630 (1993), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. After the 1990 census, North Carolina qualified to have a 12th district and drew it in a distinct snake-like manner in order to create a "majority-minority" Black district. From there, Ruth O. Shaw sued to challenge this proposed plan with the argument that this 12th district was unconstitutional and violated the Fourteenth Amendment under the clause of equal protection. In contrast, Reno, the Attorney General, argued that the district would allow for minority groups to have a voice in elections. In the decision, the court ruled in a 5–4 majority that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause and on the basis that it violated the Fourteenth Amendment because it was drawn solely based on race.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pennsylvania's congressional districts</span> Congressional districting since 2003

After the 2000 census, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania was divided into 19 congressional districts, decreasing from 21 due to reapportionment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Florida's congressional districts</span> U.S. House districts in the state of Florida

Florida is divided into 28 congressional districts, each represented by a member of the United States House of Representatives. After the 2020 census, the number of Florida's seats was increased from 27 to 28, due to the state's increase in population, and subsequent reapportionment in 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Carolina's 1st congressional district</span> U.S. House district for North Carolina

North Carolina's 1st congressional district is located in the northeastern part of the state. It consists of many Black Belt counties that border Virginia and it extends southward into several counties of the Inner Banks and the Research Triangle. It covers many rural areas of northeastern North Carolina, among the state's most economically poor, as well as outer exurbs of urbanized Research Triangle. It contains towns and cities such as Greenville, Rocky Mount, Wilson, Goldsboro, Henderson, and Roanoke Rapids.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North Carolina's 12th congressional district</span> U.S. House district for North Carolina

North Carolina's 12th congressional district is a congressional district located in the northern and eastern portions of Charlotte as well as surrounding areas in Mecklenburg County and Cabarrus County represented by Democrat Alma Adams. Prior to the 2016 elections, it was a gerrymandered district located in central North Carolina that comprised portions of Charlotte, Winston-Salem, Greensboro, Lexington, Salisbury, Concord, and High Point.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gerrymandering in the United States</span> Setting electoral district boundaries to favor specific political interests in legislative bodies

Gerrymandering is the practice of setting boundaries of electoral districts to favor specific political interests within legislative bodies, often resulting in districts with convoluted, winding boundaries rather than compact areas. The term "gerrymandering" was coined after a review of Massachusetts's redistricting maps of 1812 set by Governor Elbridge Gerry noted that one of the districts looked like a mythical salamander.

The National Democratic Redistricting Committee (NDRC) is a US political organization that focuses on redistricting and is aligned with the Democratic Party. It was founded in 2017 with the primary goal of stopping partisan gerrymandering and advocating for fair and transparent redistricting processes. The organization coordinates campaign strategy, supports redistricting reform, and files lawsuits against state redistricting maps.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2020 United States redistricting cycle</span>

The 2020 United States redistricting cycle is in progress following the completion of the 2020 United States census. In all fifty states, various bodies are re-drawing state legislative districts. States that are apportioned more than one seat in the United States House of Representatives are also drawing new districts for that legislative body.

Cooper v. Harris, 581 U.S. ___ (2017), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court ruled 5–3 that the North Carolina General Assembly used race too heavily in re-drawing two Congressional districts following the 2010 Census.

REDMAP is a project of the Republican State Leadership Committee of the United States to increase Republican control of congressional seats as well as state legislatures, largely through determination of electoral district boundaries. The project has made effective use of partisan gerrymandering, by relying on previously unavailable mapping software such as Maptitude to improve the precision with which district lines are strategically drawn. The strategy was focused on swing blue states like Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, North Carolina, and Wisconsin where there was a Democratic majority but which they could swing towards Republican with appropriate redistricting. The project was launched in 2010 and estimated to have cost the Republican party around US$30 million.

Benisek v. Lamone, 585 U.S. ____ (2018), and Lamone v. Benisek, 588 U.S. ____ (2019), were a pair of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States in a case dealing with the topic of partisan gerrymandering arising from the 2011 Democratic party-favored redistricting of Maryland. At the center of the cases was Maryland's 6th district which historically favored Republicans and which was redrawn in 2011 to shift the political majority to become Democratic via vote dilution. Affected voters filed suit, stating that the redistricting violated their right of representation under Article One, Section Two of the U.S. Constitution and freedom of association of the First Amendment.

Rucho v. Common Cause, No. 18-422, 588 U.S. 684 (2019) is a landmark case of the United States Supreme Court concerning partisan gerrymandering. The Court ruled that while partisan gerrymandering may be "incompatible with democratic principles", the federal courts cannot review such allegations, as they present nonjusticiable political questions outside the jurisdiction of these courts.

Thomas Brooks Hofeller was a Republican political strategist primarily known for his involvement in gerrymandering electoral district maps favorable for Republicans. David Daley of The New Yorker referred to Hofeller as "the master of the modern gerrymander." According to The New York Times, Hofeller's "mastery of redistricting strategy helped propel the Republican Party from underdog to the dominant force in state legislatures and the United States House of Representatives."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Redistricting in North Carolina</span> USA gerrymandering controversy (2010-)

Redistricting in North Carolina has been a controversial topic due to allegations and admissions of gerrymandering.

Moore v. Harper, 600 U.S. 1 (2023), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that rejected the independent state legislature theory (ISL), a theory that asserts state legislatures have sole authority to establish election laws for federal elections within their respective states without judicial review by state courts, without presentment to state governors, and without constraint by state constitutions. The case arose from the redistricting of North Carolina's districts by its legislature after the 2020 United States census, which the state courts found to be too artificial and partisan, and an extreme case of gerrymandering in favor of the Republican Party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2024 United States House of Representatives elections</span> House elections for the 119th U.S. Congress

The 2024 United States House of Representatives elections will be held on November 5, 2024, as part of the 2024 United States elections, to elect representatives from all 435 congressional districts across each of the 50 U.S. states, as well as six non-voting delegates from the District of Columbia and the inhabited U.S. territories. Special elections may also be held on various dates throughout 2024. Numerous other federal, state, and local elections, including the U.S. presidential election and elections to the Senate, will also be held on this date. The winners of this election will serve in the 119th United States Congress, with seats apportioned among the states based on the 2020 United States census.

Alexander v. South Carolina State Conference of the NAACP is a pending United States Supreme Court case regarding racial gerrymandering and partisan gerrymandering. It's the first partisan gerrymandering case taken by the Supreme Court after its landmark decision in Rucho v. Common Cause which stated that partisan gerrymandering claims present political questions beyond the reach of the federal courts, and the first racial gerrymandering case after the court's landmark decision in Allen v. Milligan.

References

  1. Merica, Dan; Stark, Liz (April 26, 2021). "Census Bureau announces 331 million people in US, Texas will add two congressional seats". CNN. Retrieved April 26, 2021.
  2. "Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives". clerk.house.gov. Retrieved January 6, 2022.
  3. "2022 Cook PVI: District Map and List". The Cook Political Report. July 12, 2022. Retrieved January 7, 2023.
  4. Powell, William S.; Criner, Allyson C. (2006). "Civil Rights Movement Part 6: Continued Civil Rights Battles in the State". NCPedia. North Carolina Government & Heritage Library. Retrieved December 11, 2022.
  5. "Shaw v. Hunt, 861 F. Supp. 408 (E.D.N.C. 1994)". Justia Law. Retrieved August 1, 2023.
  6. "Shaw v. Hunt, 517 U.S. 899 (1996)". Justia Law. Retrieved September 28, 2023.
  7. "Cromartie v. Hunt, 34 F. Supp. 2d 1029 (E.D.N.C. 1998)".
  8. "Cromartie v. Hunt, 133 F. Supp. 2d 407 (E.D.N.C. 2000)".
  9. Blythe, Anne (February 5, 2016). "Federal court invalidates maps of two NC congressional districts". The Charlotte Observer. Archived from the original on September 29, 2019. Retrieved October 28, 2019.
  10. "Supreme Court tosses Republican-drawn North Carolina voting districts". Reuters. May 22, 2017. Archived from the original on May 22, 2017. Retrieved October 29, 2019.
  11. Stern, Mark Joseph (May 22, 2017). "In Cooper v. Harris, the Supreme Court strikes a blow against racial redistricting". Slate Magazine. Archived from the original on October 29, 2019. Retrieved October 29, 2019.
  12. 1 2 Blinder, Alan (January 9, 2018). "North Carolina Congressional Map Ruled Unconstitutionally Gerrymandered". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved January 9, 2018.
  13. "Supreme Court Blocks Redrawing of North Carolina Congressional Maps". Reuters. Retrieved January 20, 2018.
  14. Liptak, Adam (June 27, 2019). "Supreme Court Says Constitution Does Not Bar Partisan Gerrymandering". The New York Times. Retrieved June 27, 2019.
  15. Supreme Court of the United States supremecourt.gov
  16. "North Carolina General Assembly - 2016 Contingent Congressional Plan - Corrected*". Archived from the original on April 16, 2016.
  17. "Common Cause v. Representative David R Lewis, et al. Judgement" (PDF). CommonCause.org. September 5, 2019. Retrieved September 5, 2019.
  18. Doran, Will (September 3, 2019). "After maps struck down in NC gerrymandering lawsuit, top Republican leader won't appeal". Herald Sun. Retrieved September 7, 2019.
  19. Timm, Jane C. (September 4, 2019). "North Carolina judges slam GOP gerrymandering in stinging ruling, reject district maps". NBC News. Retrieved September 5, 2019.
  20. Williams, Pete (August 28, 2019). "Court throws out North Carolina's congressional district maps". NBC News. Archived from the original on October 29, 2019. Retrieved October 28, 2019.
  21. "House Bill 1029 / SL 2019-249 (2019-2020 Session) - North Carolina General Assembly". www.ncleg.gov.
  22. Timm, Jane C. (December 2, 2019). "In blow to North Carolina Democrats, court rules new GOP-drawn voting maps can be used for 2020". NBC News. Retrieved December 3, 2019.
  23. "NC Supreme Court strikes down redrawn voting maps". WTVD . February 5, 2022. Archived from the original on February 5, 2022. Retrieved February 8, 2022.
  24. Wilkie, Jordan (February 23, 2022). "All sides appeal redistricting decision to NC Supreme Court". Carolina Public Press. Archived from the original on February 24, 2022. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  25. Doyle, Steve (February 23, 2022). "Check out new election maps: NC Supreme Court rejects appeals, approves special masters' districts". WGHP . Archived from the original on February 24, 2022. Retrieved February 24, 2022.
  26. Timm, Jane C. (April 28, 2023). "N.C.'s new GOP-controlled high court reverses itself on gerrymandering and voter ID". NBC News. Retrieved October 25, 2023.
  27. Zach, Montellaro; Josh, Gerstein; Ally, Mutnick (April 28, 2023). "North Carolina Supreme Court clears way for partisan gerrymandering". POLITICO. Retrieved October 25, 2023.
  28. Robertson, Gary D. (October 25, 2023). "North Carolina Republicans put exclamation mark on pivotal annual session with redistricting maps". AP News. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
  29. Lopez, Ashley (October 25, 2023). "North Carolina lawmakers approve maps creating gains for the GOP in Congress". NPR. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
  30. Schouten, Fredreka; Gallagher, Dianne (October 25, 2023). "North Carolina legislature approves map that could help Republicans gain at least 3 House seats in 2024". CNN Politics. Retrieved October 26, 2023.
  31. Robertson, Gary D. (December 4, 2023). "New North Carolina congressional districts challenged in federal court on racial bias claims". AP News. Retrieved December 9, 2023.
  32. Gallagher, Dianne (December 5, 2023). "Lawsuit seeks to block North Carolina congressional map, alleging it discriminates against minority voters". CNN Politics. Retrieved December 9, 2023.
  33. Robertson, Gary D. (December 19, 2023). "North Carolina's election maps for 2024 are racially biased, advocates say in lawsuit". AP News. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  34. Selzer, Rachel (December 19, 2023). "Civil Rights Groups and Black Voters Sue Over New North Carolina Maps". Democracy Docket. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  35. Bonner, Lynn (December 19, 2024). "Voting rights groups file sweeping lawsuit against NC redistricting plans". NC Newsline. Retrieved January 26, 2024.
  36. "North Carolina Congressional Redistricting Challenge (2023)". Democracy Docket. March 19, 2024. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
  37. "North Carolina 2023 Redistricting Challenge". Democracy Docket. March 19, 2024. Retrieved March 28, 2024.
  38. "Digital Boundary Definitions of United States Congressional Districts, 1789–2012" . Retrieved October 18, 2014.