Part of the Politics series |
Electoral systems |
---|
Politicsportal |
Open list describes any variant of party-list proportional representation where voters have at least some influence on the order in which a party's candidates are elected. This is as opposed to closed list, in which party lists are in a pre-determined, fixed order by the time of the election and gives the general voter no influence at all on the position of the candidates placed on the party list.
An open list system allows voters to select individuals rather than, or in addition to parties. Different systems give the voter different amounts of influence to change the default ranking. The voter's candidate choices are usually called preference vote; the voters are usually allowed one or more preference votes for the open list candidates.
Open lists differ from mixed-member proportional representation, also known as "personalized proportional representation" in Germany. Some mixed systems, however, may use open lists in their list-PR component.
A "relatively closed" open list system is one where a candidate must get a full quota of votes on their own to be assured of winning a seat. (This quota, broadly speaking, is the total number of votes cast divided by the number of places to be filled. Usually, the precise number required is the Hare quota, but the Droop quota can also be used.)
The total number of seats won by the party minus the number of its candidates that achieved this quota gives the number of unfilled seats. These are then successively allocated to the party's not-yet-elected candidates who were ranked highest on the original list.
Iceland: In both parliamentary and municipal elections, voters may alter the order of the party list or strike candidates from the list completely. How many votes need to be altered in this way to have an effect on the results varies by the number of seats won by the party in the constituency or municipality in question and the candidate's place on the list. [1] In the parliamentary elections of 2007 and 2009, voters altered the party lists enough to change the ranking of candidates within party lists. However, this did not affect which candidates ultimately got elected to parliament. [2]
Norway: In parliamentary elections, 50% of the voters need to vote for a candidate in order to change the order of the party list, meaning that, in practice, it is almost impossible for voters to change the result and it is de facto a closed list system. In county elections there is a threshold of 8%. [3]
The Ley de Lemas allows the voter to indicate on the ballot the preference for different political factions or lists of candidates within a political party.
In a "more open" list system, the quota for election could be lowered from the above amount. It is then (theoretically) possible that more of a party's candidates achieve this quota than the total seats won by the party. It should therefore be made clear in advance whether list ranking or absolute votes take precedence in that case. The quota for individuals is usually specified either as a percentage of the party list quota, or as a percentage of the total votes received by the party.
Example: The quota is 1000 votes and the open list threshold is specified as 25% of the quota, i.e. 250 votes. Therefore, a party which received 5000 votes wins five seats, which are awarded to its list candidates as follows:
Candidate position on the list | Preference votes | 25% of the quota | Elected |
---|---|---|---|
#1 | 3500 | x (first) | x |
#2 | 50 | x | |
#3 | 150 | x | |
#4 | 250 | x (third) | x |
#5 | 100 | ||
#6 | 100 | ||
#7 | 450 | x (second) | x |
#8 | 50 | ||
Candidates #1, #7 and #4 have each achieved 25% of the quota (250 preference votes or more). They get the first three of the five seats the party has won. The other two seats will be taken by #2 and #3, the two highest remaining positions on the party list. This means that #5 is not elected even though being the fifth on the list and having more preference votes than #2.
In practice, with such a strict threshold, only very few candidates succeed to precede on their lists as the required number of votes is huge. Where the threshold is lower (e.g. in Czech parliamentary elections, 5% of the total party vote is the required minimum), results defying the original list order are much more common.
Parties usually allow candidates to ask for preference votes, but without campaigning negatively against other candidates on the list.
The members of the National Council are elected by open list proportional representation in nine multi-member constituencies based on the states (with varying in size from 7 to 36 seats) and 39 districts. Voters are able to cast a single party vote and one preference votes each on the federal, state and electoral district level for their preferred candidates within that party. The thresholds for a candidate to move up the list are 7% of the candidate's party result on the federal level, 10% on the state level and 14% on the electoral district level. [4] Candidates for the district level are listed on the ballot while voters need to write-in their preferred candidate on state and federal level.
In Croatia, the voter can give their vote to a single candidate on the list, but only candidates who have received at least 10% of the party's votes take precedence over the other candidates on the list. [5]
In Czech parliamentary elections, voters are given 4 preference votes. Only candidates who have received more than 5% of preferential votes at the regional level take precedence over the list. [6] For elections to the European Parliament, the procedure is identical but each voter is only allowed 2 preference votes.
In Indonesia, any candidate who has obtained at least 30% of the quota is automatically elected. [7] [ needs update ]
In the Netherlands, the voter can give their vote to any candidate in a list (for example, in elections for the House of the Representatives); the vote for this candidate is called a "preference vote" (voorkeurstem in Dutch). Candidate with at least 25% of the quota takes priority over the party's other candidates who stand higher on the party list but received fewer preference votes. Most people vote for the top candidate, to indicate no special preference for any individual candidate, but support for the party in general. Sometimes, however, people want to express their support for a particular person. Many women, for example, vote for the first woman on the list. If a candidate gathers enough preference votes, then they get a seat in parliament, even if their position on the list would leave them without a seat. In the 2003 elections Hilbrand Nawijn, the former minister of migration and integration, was elected into parliament for the Pim Fortuyn List by preference votes even though he was the last candidate on the list.
In Slovakia, each voter may, in addition to the party, select one to four candidates from the ordered party list. Candidates who are selected by more than 3% of the party's voters are elected (in order of total number of votes) first and only then is the party ordering used. For European elections, voters select two candidates and the candidates must have more than 10% of the total votes to override the party list. In the European election in 2009 three of Slovakia's thirteen MEPs were elected solely by virtue of preference votes (having party-list positions too low to have won otherwise) and only one (Katarína Neveďalová of SMER) was elected solely by virtue of her position on the party list (having fewer preference votes than a number of other candidates who themselves, nevertheless had preferences from fewer than 10 percent of their party's voters).
In Sweden, the "most open" list is used, but a person needs to receive 5% of the party's votes for the personal vote to overrule the ordering on the party list. [8] Voting without expressing a preference between individuals is possible, although the parties urge their voters to support the party's prime candidate, to protect them from being beaten by someone ranked lower by the party. The share of voters using the open list option at 2022 Swedish general election was 22.49%. [9]
The "most open" list system is the one where the absolute number of votes every candidate receives fully determines the "order of election" (the list ranking only possibly serving as a "tiebreaker").
When such a system is used, one could make the case that within every party an additional virtual non-transferable vote election (single or multiple based on the number of preference votes available to the voters) is taking place.
This system is used in all Finnish, Latvian and Brazilian multiple-seat elections. Since 2001, lists of this "most open" type have also been used in the elections to fill the 96 proportional seats in the 242-member upper house of Japan (the other 146 are elected through a majoritarian, SNTV/FPTP system).
Different countries have different methods of breaking ties between candidates. For example, in Finland ties may be resolved by a coin toss, while in Brazil the oldest candidate wins the tie.
A "free list", more usually called panachage, is similar in principle to the most open list, but instead of having just one vote for one candidate in one list, a voter has (usually) as many votes as there are seats to be filled, and may distribute these among different candidates in different lists. Voters may also give more votes to one candidate, in a manner similar to cumulative voting, and delete (German : Streichen or Reihen, French : latoisage) the names of some candidates. This gives the voter more control over which candidates are elected. [11]
It is used in elections at all levels in Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, and Switzerland, in congressional elections in Ecuador, El Salvador, and Honduras, as well as in local elections in a majority of German states, in French communes with under 1,000 inhabitants, and in Czech municipal elections.
Some ways to operate an open list system when using traditional paper-based voting are as follows:
Some of these states may use other systems in addition to an open list, for example first-past-the-post in individual constituencies. Some countries use open list may only be used in one of the chambers of the legislature.
Types of open list systems used in the lower house of the national legislature. [36]
Country | Legislative body | System | Variation of open lists | Number of votes (for candidates) | Apportionment method | Electoral threshold | Governmental system | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Albania | Parliament (Kuvendi) | Open list party proportional representation | d'Hondt method | 4% nationally or 2.5% in a district | Parliamentary republic | ||||
Armenia | National Assembly | Open list party proportional representation | D'Hondt method | 5% (parties), 7% (blocs) | Parliamentary republic | Party lists run-off, but only if necessary to ensure stable majority of 54% if it is not achieved either immediately (one party) or through building a coalition. [37] [38] If a party would win more than 2/3 seats, at least 1/3 seats are distributed to the other parties. | |||
— | |||||||||
Aruba | Parliament | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 | D'Hondt method | |||||
Austria | National Council | Open list party proportional representation | More open: 14% on the district level (among votes for the candidates party) | 1 in each geographic level of candidate list | Hare quota | 4% | Parliamentary republic | ||
More open: 10% on the regional (state) level (among votes for the candidates party) | Hare quota | ||||||||
More open: 7% of the on the federal level (among votes for the candidates party) | d'Hondt method | ||||||||
Belgium | Chamber of Representatives | Open list party proportional representation | As many as there are mandates in the district | D'Hondt method | 5% | Constitutional monarchy | |||
Bosnia and Herzegovina | House of Representatives | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 | Sainte-Laguë method | Parliamentary directorial republic | ||||
Brazil | Chamber of Deputies | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 | D'Hondt method | 2% distributed in at least 9 Federation Units with at least 1% of the valid votes in each one of them | Presidential republic | |||
Bulgaria | National Assembly | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 | Hare quota | 4% | Parliamentary republic | |||
Chile | Chamber of Deputies | Open list party proportional representation | 1 | ||||||
Croatia | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 | 5% | ||||||
Cyprus | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 for every 4 seats in the district | |||||||
Czech Republic | Open list party proportional representation | 0-4 | 5% | ||||||
Democratic Republic of the Congo | Parallel voting | 0-1 to 0-5 depending on number of mandates in the district | |||||||
Denmark | Folketing (Unicameral legislature) | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 | 2% | |||||
East Timor | |||||||||
Ecuador | National Congress | Open list party proportional representation | — | As many as there are mandates in the district Panachage allowed | Sainte-Laguë method | ||||
El Salvador | Legislative Assembly | Open list party proportional representation | As many as there are mandates in the district Panachage allowed | D'Hondt method | |||||
Estonia | Open list party proportional representation | 1 | 5% | ||||||
Fiji | Open list party proportional representation | 1 | D'Hondt method | 5% | |||||
Finland | Open list party proportional representation | 1 | D'Hondt method | ||||||
Greece | Majority bonus | 0-1 to 0-5 depending on number of mandates in the district | Largest remainder (Hare quota) | 3% | Nationwide closed lists and open lists in multi-member districts. The winning party used to receive a majority bonus of 50 seats (out of 300), but this system will be abolished two elections after 2016. [39] In 2020 parliament voted to return to the majority bonus two elections thereafter. [40] | ||||
Honduras | Open list party proportional representation | As many as there are mandates in the district Panachage allowed | Largest remainder (Hare quota) | ||||||
Iceland | Open list party proportional representation | May change order of candidates on list or cross out rejected candidates | d'Hondt method | ||||||
Indonesia | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 | Sainte-Laguë method | 4% | |||||
Kosovo | Open list party proportional representation | 0-5 | Sainte-Laguë method | ||||||
Latvia | Open list party proportional representation | May vote for as many candidates or reject as many candidates as there are on the list | Sainte-Laguë method | 5% | |||||
Lebanon | Open list party proportional representation | 0-1 | d'Hondt method | ||||||
Liechtenstein | Open list party proportional representation | As many as there are mandates in the district | 8% | ||||||
Lithuania | Parallel voting | 0-5 | Largest remainder (Hare quota) | ||||||
Luxembourg | Chamber of Deputies | Open list party proportional representation | Panachage (number of votes equal to the number of members elected) | May vote for or delete as many candidates as there are mandates in the district Panachage allowed | d'Hondt method | No de jure threshold | Parliamentary system | ||
Netherlands | House of Representatives | Open list party proportional representation | More open (25% of the quota to override the default party-list) | 0-1 | d'Hondt method | No de jure threshold, but an effective threshold of 0.67% (1/150) for a seat | Parliamentary system | ||
Norway | Parliament (Storting) | Open list party proportional representation | De facto closed list (50% of votes to override) | May change order of candidates on list or cross out rejected candidates | Sainte-Laguë method | 4% | |||
Panama | Parallel voting | As many as there are mandates in the district | Largest remainder (Hare quota) | ||||||
Peru | Open list party proportional representation | 0-2 | d'Hondt method | 5% | |||||
Poland | Sejm | Open list party proportional representation | 1 | d'Hondt method | 5% threshold or more for single parties, 8% or more for coalitions or 0% or more for minorities | Parliamentary republic | |||
San Marino | Majority jackpot / Open list party proportional representation | 1 | d'Hondt method | 3.5% | If needed to ensure a stable majority, the two best-placed parties participate in a run-off vote to receive a majority bonus. | ||||
Slovakia | Open list party proportional representation | 0-4 | Largest remainder (Hare quota) | 5% | |||||
Slovenia | Open list party proportional representation | Largest remainder (Droop quota) | 4% | ||||||
0-1 | d'Hondt method | 4% | |||||||
Sri Lanka | Parliament | Open list party proportional representation | Panachage (up to 3 preference votes) [41] | 0-3 | d'Hondt method | 5% (per constituency) | Semi-presidential system | ||
— | ? | No threshold | |||||||
Suriname | National Assembly | Open list party proportional representation | Most open | 0-1 | d'Hondt method | No threshold | Assembly-independent republic | ||
Sweden | Riksdag | Open list party proportional representation | More open (5% of the party vote to override the default party-list) [42] | 0-1 | Sainte-Laguë method (leveling seats) | 4% nationally or 12% in a given constituency | Parliamentary system | ||
Switzerland | National Council (Lower house of national legislature) | Open list party proportional representation | Panachage | May vote for or delete as many candidates as there are mandates in the district Panachage allowed | Hagenbach-Bischoff system | No threshold | Semi-direct democracy under an assembly-independent [43] [44] directorial republic |
CEPPS
Proportional representation (PR) refers to any type of electoral system under which subgroups of an electorate are reflected proportionately in the elected body. The concept applies mainly to political divisions among voters. The essence of such systems is that all votes cast – or almost all votes cast – contribute to the result and are effectively used to help elect someone – not just a bare plurality or (exclusively) the majority – and that the system produces mixed, balanced representation reflecting how votes are cast.
Party-list proportional representation (list-PR) is a subset of proportional representation electoral systems in which multiple candidates are elected through their position on an electoral list. They can also be used as part of mixed-member electoral systems.
The single transferable vote (STV), sometimes known as proportional ranked choice voting (P-RCV), is a multi-winner electoral system in which each voter casts a single vote in the form of a ranked-choice ballot. Voters have the option to rank candidates, and their vote may be transferred according to alternate preferences if their preferred candidate is eliminated or elected with surplus votes, so that their vote is used to elect someone they prefer over others in the running. STV aims to approach proportional representation based on votes cast in the district where it is used, so that each vote is worth about the same as another. Formally, STV satisfies a fairness criterion known as proportionality for solid coalitions.
Single non-transferable vote or SNTV is an electoral system used to elect multiple winners. It is a generalization of first-past-the-post, applied to multi-member districts with each voter casting just one vote. Unlike FPTP, which is a single-winner system, in SNTV multiple winners are elected, typically in electoral districts; additionally, unlike FPTP, SNTV produces mixed representation and makes it unlikely for a single party to take all the seats in a city or a set area, which can happen under FPTP.
Voting is a method by which a group, such as a meeting or an electorate, convenes together for the purpose of making a collective decision or expressing an opinion usually following discussions, debates or election campaigns. Democracies elect holders of high office by voting. Residents of a jurisdiction represented by an elected official are called "constituents", and the constituents who choose to cast a ballot for their chosen candidate are called "voters." There are different systems for collecting votes, but while many of the systems used in decision-making can also be used as electoral systems, any which cater to proportional representation can only be used in elections.
Elections in Sweden are held once every four years. At the highest level, all 349 members of Riksdag, the national parliament of Sweden, are elected in general elections. Elections to the 20 county councils and 290 municipal assemblies – all using almost the same electoral system – are held concurrently with the legislative elections on the second Sunday in September.
The electoral system of Australia comprises the laws and processes used for the election of members of the Australian Parliament and is governed primarily by the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. The system presently has a number of distinctive features including compulsory enrolment; compulsory voting; majority-preferential instant-runoff voting in single-member seats to elect the lower house, the House of Representatives; and the use of the single transferable vote proportional representation system to elect the upper house, the Senate.
Norway elects its legislature on a national level. The parliament, the Storting, has 169 members elected for a four-year term by a form of proportional representation in multi-seat constituencies.
At a national level, Greece holds elections for its legislature, the Hellenic Parliament.
In the study of apportionment, the Harequota is the number of voters represented by each legislator under a system of proportional representation. In these voting systems, the quota is the number of votes that guarantees a candidate, or a party in some cases, captures a seat. The Hare quota is the total number of votes divided by the number of seats to be filled.
Regular elections in Albania are mandated by the Constitution and legislation enacted by Parliament. The Parliament (Kuvendi) has 140 members elected for four-year terms. The electoral system is open list proportional representation. There are 12 multi-member constituencies corresponding to the country's 12 administrative regions. Within any constituency, parties must meet a threshold of 3 percent of votes, and pre-election coalitions must meet a threshold of 5 percent of votes.
There are five types of elections in Slovakia: municipal elections, regional elections, parliamentary elections, presidential elections and elections to the European Parliament. All four types of elections are normally held after fixed periods, although early elections can occur in certain situations. Elections are conventionally scheduled for a Saturday - the polls normally open at 7:00 in the morning and close at 22:00 in the evening. Citizens aged 18 years or older are eligible to vote. Those serving prison sentences for particularly serious crimes, as well as those deprived of legal capacity, including persons with mental disabilities, are denied the right to vote. Voter registration is passive and decentralized with the voter register maintained by municipalities based on the permanent residence register. Voter lists are updated continuously based on municipal records and input provided by state institutions or other municipalities. Voters may verify their data in voter lists, and, if necessary, request correction until the day before election day. On election day, a voter can be added to a voter list upon presenting an identity card with proof of residency. Some 4.4 million voters are registered and valid to vote in the elections. Voters are only able to vote from abroad during the Parliamentary Elections in Slovakia.
The single transferable vote (STV) is a proportional representation voting system that elects multiple winners. It is one of several ways of choosing winners from ballots that rank candidates by preference. Under STV, an elector's vote is initially allocated to their most-preferred candidate. Candidates are elected (winners) if their vote tally reaches quota. After this 1st Count, if seats still remain open, surplus votes are transferred from winners to remaining candidates (hopefuls) according to the surplus ballots' next usable back-up preference. if no surplus votes have to be transferred, then the least-popular candidate is eliminated so the vote has chance to be placed on a candidate who can use it.
The Edmonton provincial electoral district also known as Edmonton City from 1905 to 1909, was a provincial electoral district in Alberta, Canada mandated to return members to the Legislative Assembly of Alberta from 1905 to 1917 and again from 1921 to 1959.
There are a number of complications and issues surrounding the application and use of single transferable vote proportional representation that form the basis of discussions between its advocates and detractors.
An electoral system or voting system is a set of rules that determine how elections and referendums are conducted and how their results are determined. Electoral systems are used in politics to elect governments, while non-political elections may take place in business, non-profit organisations and informal organisations. These rules govern all aspects of the voting process: when elections occur, who is allowed to vote, who can stand as a candidate, how ballots are marked and cast, how the ballots are counted, how votes translate into the election outcome, limits on campaign spending, and other factors that can affect the result. Political electoral systems are defined by constitutions and electoral laws, are typically conducted by election commissions, and can use multiple types of elections for different offices.
Parliamentary elections were held in Cyprus on 30 May 2021 to elect 56 of the 80 Members of the House of Representatives.
A gender quota is a quota used by countries and parties to increase women's representation or substantive equality based on gender in legislatures. Women are largely underrepresented in parliaments and account for a 26.9% average in parliaments globally. As of November 2021, gender quotas have been adopted in 132 countries. Around the world, quotas vary greatly in their enforcement and the stage of electoral process targeted, creating three main types of quotas: legislated candidate quotas, voluntary party quotas, and reserved seats. Regardless of their prevalence, they are a controversial measure, creating debates concerning their impacts, both negative and positive.
Parliamentary elections are to be held in Slovenia no later than 24 April 2026.