West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List

Last updated
The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List on folio 1r of Cambridge Corpus Christi College MS 173 (also known as the Parker Chronicle). Cambridge Corpus Christi College MS 173 (aka Parker Chronicle) folio 1r the West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List.jpg
The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List on folio 1r of Cambridge Corpus Christi College MS 173 (also known as the Parker Chronicle).

The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List (also known as the West Saxon Regnal Table, West Saxon Regnal List, and Genealogical Preface to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle) is the name given in modern scholarship to a list of West-Saxon kings (which has no title in its medieval manuscripts, and is not strictly a genealogy). It is one of the main sources for understanding the early history of Wessex and the attempts of its dynasties (at the time of Alfred the Great and possibly before) to project an image of dynastic stability.

Contents

Content

The List begins with Cerdic (claiming that he arrived in Wessex in 494) and extends to Alfred (r. 871–99). Thus the list probably took its surviving form during Alfred's reign. The list generally simply gives the reign-length of each king and names his successor, sometimes adding extra information about each king's genealogy and especially his ultimate descent from Cerdic; Æthelwulf, Alfred's father, is given an especially full statement of pedigree. The List also notes that its sixth ruler, Cynegils, was the first of the West-Saxon kings to receive baptism. [1] :22–23

As edited by David Dumville, the List begins: [2]

Ða wæs agangen fram Cristes acennednysse .cccc. ⁊ .xciiii. wintra þa Cerdic ⁊ Cynric his sunu coman upp æt Cerdicesoran mid fif scipum — ⁊ se Cerdic was Elesing, Elesa Gewising, Gewis Wiging, Wig Freawining, Freawine Freoþogaring, Freodogar Bronding, Brond Bældæging, Bældæg Wodening. þæs ymbe .vi. gear ðæs þe hi upp coman, hi geeodan Westseaxna rice ⁊ þæt wæron ða ærestan cyningas þe Westseaxena land on Wealum geeodan. ⁊ he hæfde þæt rice .xvi. gear. þa gefor he, þa feng Cynric his sunu to þam rice ⁊ heold .xxvii. wintra. þa he forðferde, þa feng Ceaulin his sunu to ⁊ heold .vii. gear.


When four hundred and ninety-four years had passed from the birth of Christ, Cerdic and his son Cynric landed at Cerdicesora with five ships — and that Cerdic was son of Elesa, Elesa of Gewis, Gewis of Wig, Wig of Freawine, Freawine of Freoþogar, Freoðogar of Brond, Brong of Bældæg, and Bældæg of Woden. Around six years after they landed, they occupied the kingdom of the West Saxons and they were the earliest kings to occupy the land of the West Saxons against the Romans. And he held that kingdom for sixteen years. When he passed, his son Cynric succeeded him, and held the kingdom for twenty-seven years. When he passed on, his son Ceaulin succeeded him, and held it for seven years.

History and source-value

Origin of the surviving version of the List

The surviving manuscripts of the List are close copies of a text which scholars agree was compiled to promote the West-Saxon royal dynasty and its legitimacy. In the analysis of Susan Irvine, in the earliest manuscript of the Chronicle (Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, MS 173), the

genealogical and regnal list acts as a preface to this version of the Chronicle [...] Though the range of the Chronicle itself extends across the various Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, the West Saxon genealogical and regnal list with which it opens establishes the paramount importance of the dynasty springing from Cerdic. [...] The structural symmetry of the preface—the reference at both the beginning and end to the conquering of the land of the West Saxons from the Britons—emphasises that the West Saxon dynasty is to be seen as culminating in Alfred's reign. [3]

Comparing stylistic traits of the genealogies in the West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List with its likely early source material (represented by the Anglian King-list), and with the genealogies in the "Common Stock" of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, Thomas A. Bredehoft showed that, when adding new genealogical material to their sources, the List and the Chronicle shared a literary style different from the Anglian King-list, and argued that one scholar was involved in editing both the West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List and the Chronicle, emphasising the idea that they were closely linked components of King Alfred the Great's image-crafting. [4] :14–38

Reign-lengths in the earliest version of the List

Understanding how the List came to be compiled and from what sources has been central to evaluating it and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as sources for West-Saxon history before Alfred's reign. Several manuscripts of the List also contain a separate copy of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, but the body of the Chronicle itself evidently drew on an earlier version of the List, and Dumville showed that all these witnesses to the List diverge to some degree from what the earliest text of the List must have said. Through detailed textual criticism of all manuscripts of both the List and the Chronicle, he was able to reconstruct the likely archetype of the List and show how the surviving versions of the List and the Chronicle altered it. [1] Dumville inferred that the archetype of the List gave the following reign-lengths down to Ine (after which there is little divergence): [2] :25–51

kingreign inferred for archetype of the manuscripts of the Chroniclereign inferred for the earliest version of the List (converting reign-lengths into years AD)
Cerdic500–34 and 519–34538–54
Cynric534–60554–81
Ceawlin560–91581–88
Ceol591–97588–94
Ceolwulf597–611594–611
Cynegils611–42611–42
Cenwealh642–73642–73
Seaxburh673–74673–74
Æscwine674–76674–76
Centwine676–85676–85
Ceadwalla685–88685–88
Ine688–726688–726

Source-value for the seventh century onwards

Dumville inferred that the earliest version of the List might have drawn on a list of West-Saxon kings in the Anglian king-list, adding regnal dates to that. [1] :59–60 (The West-Saxon section of the Anglian king-list reads: "Ine Cenreding; Cenred Ceolwalding; Ceolwald Cuþwulfing; Cuþwulf Cuþwining; Cuþwine Celing; Celin Cynricing; Cynric Creoding; Creoda Cerdicing; Cerdic Alucing; Aluca Giwising; Giwis Branding; Brand Bældæging; Bældæg Wodning; Woden Frealafing".) [5] He also noted that "on the available evidence only the pre-christian period of West Saxon history presents severe chronological problems. That fact is itself suggestive both of an adequate means of transmission of chronological information (apparently without intentional manipulation of reign-lengths), from the first establishment of christian institutions". This suggests that the king list might reflect written records that started to be kept with the conversion of the West-Saxon kings around the 630s. [1] :49,cf. 63

Whatever its source(s), Dumville inferred that contemporary records began to be added to an initial version of the List from around the reign of Ine (which concluded in 726), due to the growing detail and precision of dating in the List. [1] :56 The List offers even more precise information from the reign of Ecgberht (r. 802–39), so its information is even more certainly contemporary from that point. [1] :56

Source-value for the sixth century

For the sixth century, however, the List and Chronicle are likely "a political fiction" designed to suggest "that a West Saxon monarchy of ninth-century type existed from the foundation of the kingdom, with one member of the Cerdicing dynasty following another in more or less lineal succession". Sixth-century West-Saxon political reality was more likely a mélange of competing petty kings. Although some or even all of the kings named in the List may have been real, their succession may not have been uninterrupted and their status not uniformly recognised. [1] :57 Since King Alfred and his brothers drew their legitimacy from descent from Cerdic, this agenda would fit, and might reflect, Alfred's late ninth-century political interests. [1] :60–61

Dumville concluded that the regnal dates in the archetype of the List implicitly placed Cerdic's arrival in Britain not in 494, as stated in the Chronicle, but in 532, stating that "the earliest recoverable phase of West Saxon historiography indicates a view that West Saxon dynastic origins might be traced back to the 530s". [1] :66 He found the idea that the West Saxons first came under the dominance of a single dynasty around this time is plausible, since it is similar to the chronology of political developments elsewhere in England. [1] :65 On two subsequent occasions in copies of chronicles based on the archetype of the List, which subsequently became sources for the surviving Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, the beginning of this chronology was pushed back by nineteen years (a period of time corresponding to a Paschal cycle and therefore a natural unit of time to early medieval clerics), extending the foundation of the dynasty first from 538 to 519, and then to 500. [1] :62–65 It was these dislocations that produced two obviously duplicated entries for the West Saxon arrival in Wessex, with a gap of nineteen years, in the Chronicle: the 495 annal saying that (six years before the beginning of Cerdic's rule) Cerdic and Cynric arrived at Cerdicesora "⁊ þy ilcan dæge gefuhtun wiþ Walum" ("and they fought against the Romans that same day") and the 514 annal saying that the West Saxons arrived at Cerdicesora "⁊ fuhton wiþ Brettas ⁊ hie gefliemdon" ("and fought against the Britons and put them to flight"). The resulting gap between the beginning of the Cerdicing dynasty and the accurate regnal years of the seventh century was filled by extending the reign of Ceawlin from seven years to thirty-one, possibly because he alone of the List's seventh-century kings had the status of being mentioned by the prestigious historian Bede in his Ecclesiastical History of the English People . [1] :58–59

These alterations to the length of the reigns in the archetype of the List were presumably made to put the beginning of the Cerdicing dynasty closer to what was believed to be the time of the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain and to compete with claims to dynastic antiquity in rival kingdoms. [1] :61–62,65–67

Influence

The Anno Domini dates given in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle for sixth-century West-Saxon kings, and possibly many subsequent ones, seem to be based on (or, at times, adapted from) the earliest reconstructable version of the List (via lost, intermediary chronicles), and these dates are thought to have provided the framework into which the dates of battles said to be fought by those kings were fitted. [6] :34–39 The archetype of the List may even have inspired some dates of non-West Saxon dynasties in the Chronicle: Patrick Sims-Williams suggested that the thirty-three year reign that the Chronicle ascribes to Hengest and his son Oisc, the first kings of Kent, who supposedly reigned 455–88, was inspired by the thirty-four year reign ascribed to Cerdic (working alongside his son Cynric). [6] :35

Manuscripts

The primary manuscripts of the List (from which a few other medieval and post-medieval copies are known to descend) are: [7]

ShelfmarkDatePlaceSiglaOther key texts in manuscript
Napier [8] and Hackenberg [9] Dumville [1] [2] Dictionary of Old English Sparks, Windram, and Howe [7]
London, British Library, Add. 23211, fol. 1r (until 1997 1v)c. 871 × 899WessexSNKSB 2 (Sweet) B18.2BL23Computistical texts; Old English Martyrology
Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 173, fol. 1rC9/10Wessex, possibly WinchesterPPChronA (Bately) B17.1C173 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle A
London, British Library, Add. 34652, fol. 2mid-C10 and early C11WinchesterAQKSB 3 (Nap) B18.3BL34 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle G
London, British Library, Cotton Tiberius A. iii, fol. 178second half of C10, probably 977×79TTKSB 4 (Dickins) B18.4CTA3 Anglo-Saxon Chronicle B
Cambridge, University Library, Kk. 3. 18, fols. 3v-4rsecond quarter of C11WorcesterCaVBede 5 B9.6.7ULK3 Ecclesiastical History of the English People
Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 383, fol. 69vC11/12Probably London, St Paul'sJWKSB 1 (Dickins) B18.1C383Legal texts
Rochester, Cathedral Library, A.3.5, fols. 7v-8v.c. 1123×25TTKSB 7.1 (Ingram) B18.7.1TR35Legal texts and genealogies

Most or all of these are thought to be independent witnesses to the lost ninth-century archetype of the List. [2] [7]

Editions

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ceawlin of Wessex</span> King of Wessex (560–592)

Ceawlin was a King of Wessex. He may have been the son of Cynric of Wessex and the grandson of Cerdic of Wessex, whom the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle represents as the leader of the first group of Saxons to come to the land which later became Wessex. Ceawlin was active during the last years of the Anglo-Saxon expansion, with little of southern England remaining in the control of the native Britons by the time of his death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wessex</span> Anglo-Saxon kingdom in the south of Great Britain

The Kingdom of the West Saxons, also known as the Kingdom of Wessex, was an Anglo-Saxon kingdom in the south of Great Britain, from around 519 until England was unified by Æthelstan in 927.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ecgberht, King of Wessex</span> King of Wessex (802–839)

Ecgberht, also spelled Egbert, Ecgbert, Ecgbriht, Ecgbeorht, and Ecbert, was King of Wessex from 802 until his death in 839. His father was King Ealhmund of Kent. In the 780s, Ecgberht was forced into exile to Charlemagne's court in the Frankish Empire by the kings Offa of Mercia and Beorhtric of Wessex, but on Beorhtric's death in 802, Ecgberht returned and took the throne.

Cynric was King of Wessex from 534 to 560. Everything known about him comes from the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. There, he is stated to have been the son of Cerdic, who is considered the founder of the kingdom of Wessex. However, the Anglian King-list and parts of the West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List, instead says that Cynric was the son of Cerdic's son Creoda. Similarly, the paternal genealogy of Alfred the Great given in Asser's The Life of King Alfred, includes the name Creoda, while the account of the king's maternal ancestry in the same work calls Cynric son of Cerdic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cerdic of Wessex</span> King of Wessex (519–534)

Cerdic is described in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as a leader of the Anglo-Saxon settlement of Britain, being the founder and first king of Wessex, reigning from around 519 to 534 AD. Subsequent kings of Wessex were each claimed by the Chronicle to descend in some manner from Cerdic. His origin, ethnicity, and even his very existence have been extensively disputed. However, though claimed as the founder of Wessex by later West Saxon kings, he would have been known to contemporaries as king of the Gewissae, a folk or tribal group. The first king of the Gewissae to call himself 'King of the West Saxons', was Cædwalla, in a charter of 686.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ine of Wessex</span> King of Wessex

Ine, also rendered Ini or Ina, was King of Wessex from 689 to 726. At Ine's accession, his kingdom dominated much of southern England. However, he was unable to retain the territorial gains of his predecessor, Cædwalla, who had expanded West Saxon territory substantially. By the end of Ine's reign, the kingdoms of Kent, Sussex, and Essex were no longer under West Saxon sway; however, Ine maintained control of what is now Hampshire, and consolidated and extended Wessex's territory in the western peninsula.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cædwalla of Wessex</span> 7th-century King of Wessex

Cædwalla was the King of Wessex from approximately 685 until he abdicated in 688. His name is derived from the Welsh Cadwallon. He was exiled from Wessex as a youth and during this period gathered forces and attacked the South Saxons, killing their king, Æthelwealh, in what is now Sussex. Cædwalla was unable to hold the South Saxon territory, however, and was driven out by Æthelwealh's ealdormen. In either 685 or 686, he became King of Wessex. He may have been involved in suppressing rival dynasties at this time, as an early source records that Wessex was ruled by underkings until Cædwalla.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">House of Wessex</span> English royal dynasty

The House of Wessex, also known as the House of Cerdic, the House of the West Saxons, the House of the Gewisse, the Cerdicings and the West Saxon dynasty, refers to the family, traditionally founded by Cerdic of the Gewisse, that ruled Wessex in Southern England from the early 6th century. The house became dominant in southern England after the accession of King Ecgberht in 802. Alfred the Great saved England from Viking conquest in the late ninth century and his grandson Æthelstan became first king of England in 927. The disastrous reign of Æthelred the Unready ended in Danish conquest in 1014. Æthelred and his son Edmund Ironside attempted to resist the Vikings in 1016, but after their deaths the Danish Cnut the Great and his sons ruled until 1042. The House of Wessex then briefly regained power under Æthelred's son Edward the Confessor, but lost it after the Confessor's reign, with the Norman Conquest in 1066. All kings of England since Henry II have been descended from the House of Wessex through Henry I's wife Matilda of Scotland, who was a great-granddaughter of Edmund Ironside.

Beorhtwulf was King of Mercia, a kingdom of Anglo-Saxon England, from 839 or 840 to 852. His ancestry is unknown, though he may have been connected to Beornwulf, who ruled Mercia in the 820s. Almost no coins were issued by Beorhtwulf's predecessor, Wiglaf, but a Mercian coinage was restarted by Beorhtwulf early in his reign, initially with strong similarities to the coins of Æthelwulf of Wessex, and later with independent designs. The Vikings attacked within a year or two of Beorhtwulf's accession: the province of Lindsey was raided in 841, and London, a key centre of Mercian commerce, was attacked the following year. Another Viking assault on London in 851 "put Beorhtwulf to flight", according to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle; the Vikings were subsequently defeated by Æthelwulf. This raid may have had a significant economic impact on Mercia, as London coinage is much reduced after 851.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cynegils</span> Early 7th-century King of Wessex

Cynegils was King of Wessex from c. 611 to c. 642. Cynegils is traditionally considered to have been King of Wessex, even though the kingdoms of the Heptarchy had not yet formed from the patchwork of smaller kingdoms in his lifetime. The later kingdom of Wessex was centred on the counties of Hampshire, Dorset, Somerset and Wiltshire but the evidence of the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle is that the kingdom of Cynegils was located on the upper River Thames, extending into northern Wiltshire and Somerset, southern Gloucestershire and Oxfordshire, and western Berkshire, with Dorchester-on-Thames as one of the major royal sites. This region, probably connected to the early tribal grouping known as the Gewisse, a term used by Bede for the West Saxons, lay on the frontier between the later kingdoms of Wessex and Mercia.

The Gewisse were a tribe or clan of Anglo-Saxon England, historically assumed to have been based in the upper Thames region around Dorchester on Thames. The Gewisse are one of the direct precursors of modern-day England, being the origin of its predecessor states according to Saxon legend.

Ceolwulf was a King of Wessex. At that early date the West Saxons were called the Gewisse, and in his Dictionary of National Biography entry he is given the title "king of the Gewisse". According to the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle he reigned fourteen years and the Annals of St Neots also allot him fourteen years. The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List gives him a reign of seventeen years.

Ceol is portrayed by the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle and West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List as King of Wessex for five to six years around 592 to 597 or 588 to 594.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ket and Wig</span>

Ket and Wig appear in the Gesta Danorum as the sons of Frowin, the governor of Schleswig. Wig also appears in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle as the son of Freawine (Frowin) and father of Gewis, eponymous ancestor of the kingdom of Wessex and their kings, but this is thought to be a late manipulation, inserting these heroes into a pedigree borrowed from a rival royal house, in which the Bernician eponym Bernic was replaced by the Wessex Gewis.

Creoda is a shadowy figure from early Wessex history whose existence is disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Anglian collection</span>

The Anglian collection is a collection of Anglo-Saxon royal genealogies and regnal lists. These survive in four manuscripts; two of which now reside in the British Library. The remaining two belong to the libraries of Corpus Christi College, Cambridge and Rochester Cathedral, the latter now deposited with the Medway Archives.

<i>Anglo-Saxon Chronicle</i> Set of related medieval English chronicles

The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle is a collection of annals in Old English, chronicling the history of the Anglo-Saxons.

The thula is an ancient poetic genre in the Germanic literatures. Thulas are metrical name-lists or lists of poetic synonyms compiled, mainly, for oral recitation. The main function of thulas is thought to be mnemonic. The Old Norse term was first applied to an English poem, the Old English "Widsith", by Andreas Heusler and Wilhelm Ranisch in 1903. Thulas occur as parts of longer poems, too; Old Norse examples are found in various passages of the poetic and the prose Edda, the Rígsþula as well as in the Völuspá. Thulas can be considered as sources of once canonic knowledge, rooted in prehistoric beliefs and rituals. They generally preserve mythological and cosmogonical knowledge, often proper names and toponyms, but also the names of semi-legendary or historical persons. Their language is usually highly formalized, and they make extensive use of mnemonic devices such as alliteration. For a number of archaic words and formulas, some thulas are the only available source. The term and the genre may go back to the function of the Thyle, who held the function of an orator and was responsible for the cultus.

A number of royal genealogies of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, collectively referred to as the Anglo-Saxon royal genealogies, have been preserved in a manuscript tradition based in the 8th to 10th centuries.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 David N. Dumville, 'The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List and the Chronology of Early Wessex', Peritia, 4 (1985), 21–66 [repr. David N. Dumville, Britons and Anglo-Saxons in the Early Middle Ages (Aldershot: Variorum, 1993), item VIII.
  2. 1 2 3 4 David N. Dumville, 'The West Saxon Genealogical Regnal List: Manuscripts and Texts', Anglia: Zeitschrift für Englische Philologie, 104 (1986), 1–32; doi : 10.1515/angl.1986.1986.104.1.
  3. Susan Irvine, 'The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle', in A Companion to Alfred the Great, ed. by Nicole G. Discenza and Paul E. Szarmach, Brill's Companions to the Christian Tradition, 58 (Leiden: Brill, 2015), pp. 344–67 (p. 353); doi : 10.1163/9789004283763_014.
  4. Thomas A. Bredehoft, Textual Histories: Reading in the ‘Anglo-Saxon Chronicle’ (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001).
  5. David N. Dumville, 'The Anglian Collection of Royal Genealogies and Regnal Lists', Anglo-Saxon England, 5 (1976), 23–50 (p. 34, quoting Cambridge, Corpus Christi College, 183, folio 67r).
  6. 1 2 Sims-Williams, Patrick (1983). "The Settlement of England in Bede and the Chronicle". Anglo-Saxon England. 12: 1–41. doi:10.1017/S0263675100003331. JSTOR   44510771..
  7. 1 2 3 Nicholas A. Sparks, Heather F. Windram, and Christopher J. Howe, 'The Transmission of "The West Saxon Royal Genealogy": A Phylogenetic Approach", Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 38.2 (June 2023), 737–49, doi : 10.1093/llc/fqac051.
  8. A. S. Napier, 'Two Old English Fragments', Modern Language Notes, 12 (1897), 53–57.
  9. E. Hackenberg, Die Stammtafeln der angelsächsischen Königreiche (Berlin: Mayer & Müller, 1918).