Workplace health promotion

Last updated

Workplace health promotion is the combined efforts of employers, employees, and society to improve the mental and physical health and well-being of people at work. [1] The term workplace health promotion denotes a comprehensive analysis and design of human and organizational work levels with the strategic aim of developing and improving health resources in an enterprise. The World Health Organization has prioritized the workplace as a setting for health promotion because of the large potential audience and influence on all spheres of a person's life. [2] The Luxembourg Declaration provides that health and well-being of employees at work can be achieved through a combination of:

Contents

Workplace health promotion combines alleviation of health risk factors with enhancement of health strengthening factors and seeks to further develop protection factors and health potentials. [1] [3] Workplace health promotion is complementary to the discipline of occupational safety and health, which consists of protecting workers from hazards. Successful workplace health promotion strategies include the principles of participation, project management, integration, and comprehensiveness:

A report by the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work notes growing evidence that significant cost savings can be made by implementing workplace health promotion strategies, and over 90% of United States workplaces with greater than 50 employees have health promotion programs in place. [5] [6]

Strategies to promote health in the workplace

A National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health video on creating an organizational culture of health in the workplace

Strategies for workplace health promotion need to be inclusive to account for diversity in the workforce, and behavioral economics is a key tool for implementing workplace health programs. [7] The United States Department of Health and Human Services includes five strategic guidelines for workplace health promotion in its Healthy People 2010 initiative. These include:

More generally, workplace health promotion efforts are implemented at three functional levels, including:

In most instances physical activity interventions conform to Level II of this framework and may also include elements from Level III. Incentive-based Fitness Rewards Programs (FRPs) aim to influence employee behaviors and thereby conform to Level I.[ citation needed ]

Physical activity interventions

Approximately half of all current workplace health promotion programs are based on physical activity interventions given the relative ease by which employers can advocate such efforts to employees. [10] Employer-sponsored activity interventions in the form of team sports originated as early as the 17th century in the United Kingdom, however, most 21st century interventions rely on employer sponsorship of employee access to health and fitness facilities. [11] Employee convenience to sponsored fitness facilities strongly influences program participation, and facilities located near employee locations of residence hold lower time costs, receive increased use, and yield better program and health outcomes. [12] Women frequently demonstrate lower participation in workplace exercise programs than men, and young, single individuals are often more predisposed to pursue employer-sponsored physical activity initiatives. [13] In many cases, exercise-based workplace health promotion programs struggle to attract those who would benefit the most from such fitness efforts, including aging, sedentary, blue-collar, female, or less-educated employees. [14]

The sedentary nature of many modern workplaces increases negative metabolic risk factors such as high body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, and blood pressure and elevated fasting glucose and triglyceride levels. Breaking up long periods of sedentary time is shown to improve these risks. [15] [16] Specifically, utilization of portable pedal exercise machines in office environments has been shown to improve employee health, and use was demonstrated feasible during working hours. [15] Interventions using pedometers to influence employee behavior, decrease the duration of sedentary periods, and increase total movement during the work day have also proven successful. [17] Smartphone applications and workplace signs promoting stair use are known to improve employee health, and many employers are now investing in wearable technologies to encourage employees to monitor physical activity. [18] [19] Workplace Tai Chi programs have also proven effective as a health intervention and means of reducing absenteeism, particularly in older workers. [20] Despite these efforts, many health promotion programs struggle with poor participation, and the introduction of incentives is shown to improve employee involvement. [21]

Incentive-based programs

To encourage physical activity among the workforce, many employers offer financial incentives to employees through Fitness Rewards Programs (FRPs). [12] Seeing that exercise and dieting produce immediate discomfort, the benefits of weight loss are often not noticeable in the short-term, and many people seek long-term health but succumb to near-term temptations of unhealthy eating and inactivity (hyperbolic discounting), maintaining employee involvement in wellness programs is difficult. To solve these problems of immediacy, salience, and hyperbolic discounting FRPs offer financial incentives to employees for healthy behaviors. [22] Though lack of participation remains a problem even among well crafted FRPs, attrition is not random and greater weight loss success is associated with a reduction in later program dropout probability. [22]

Effects of workplace health promotion

The positive impact of workplace health promotion programs on productivity is widely discussed. The impact of workplace health promotion on absenteeism is substantial since productivity is impossible if an employee is absent. [23] However, the effects of presenteeism are also significant, and working while sick is estimated to cost the United States economy more than $150 billion per year. [24] Absenteeism is estimated to cost the average employer $660 annually per employee. [25] Based on productivity costs, employees experiencing negative health conditions or at risk of developing impaired health cost employers up to $1601 more than healthy employees per year. [26] Improvements in productivity and absenteeism following implementation of workplace health promotion programs can annually save employers $15.6 for every one dollar spent on health initiatives. [6] More generally, employee health care costs and absentee day costs decrease by $3.27 and $2.73, respectively, for every dollar spent on workplace health promotion. [21] In some cases, employer-based health programs have been shown to yield no reduction in health care spending or employer insurance outlay. [27] [28]

Relevant to health outcomes, workplace health promotion programs have demonstrated numerous short and long term benefits. Significantly, workplace physical activity interventions are shown to improve employee fitness, activity behavior, unhealthy lipid levels, work attendance, and job stress, and workplace exercise programs are known to reduce supervisor stress and abusive supervision of subordinates, increasing productivity. [29] [30] Additional improvements have been noted following workplace health programs in injury incidence, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, body mass index, cardiovascular disease risk, dynamic muscle performance, and maximal oxygen consumption. [12] [13] [31] [32] Some improvements vary by gender, with men often experiencing more consequential improvements in body mass index than women. [16] Workplace health promotion is also known to improve the "perceived health status" of employees, enhancing productivity and improving health program participation. [14]

Summarily, the expected outcomes of an ideal workplace health promotion program include:[ citation needed ]

Health promotion in low wage industries

Approximately half of employees in the United States are employed by small (less than 1000), low wage industries. [33] However, less than 10 percent offer wellness health promotion programs [34] due to lack of financial resource, time and hesitations rooting from investment return. [33] Work health promotion aims to provide better wellbeing to all workers, however, due to economic and social barriers a disproportionate amount of low wage workers are not included in studies regarding employee health promotion.[ citation needed ]

A 2015 study in Seattle/King County metropolitan area, low wage workers compared to high-earning workers have strong links regarding risky health behaviors. [33] Risky health behaviors are recognized as tobacco use, poor nutrition and sedentary lifestyle which then are factors contributing to chronic disease. [33] This then highlights disproportionate rates of chronic diseases within low-wage earning employees compared to higher socioeconomic earners. [33] It was also revealed in the Seattle/King County metropolitan area study how although the impact of chronic disease are prevalent in low-wage workers, high earners are the group who are more inclined in participating in work health promotion. Low wage industries were found to have barriers including awareness, working conditions, and management. [33]

The largest debate in the Seattle/King County study rooted from the issue of cost. The first cost revealed is the economic financial incentive. Whereby low wage industries examine the importance of investment return. Small companies debate the issue of whether the outcomes of worker health promotion are worthy of investment or labeled as 'organizational priority.' [33] In addition to the importance of profit, is the cost of employee privacy. Human resources managers in the study voiced their issue on privacy and the importance of keeping personal health matters separate from work and their workers. [33]

In addition to high rates of chronic diseases in low wage workers, there are also high rates of morbidity and mortality and hazardous environment exposure because of both socioeconomic and racial disparities. [35] Both gender and racial discrimination are linked to lower wage workers, where women and ethnic minorities contribute to low wage earner statistics. [36] Due to complexities of the environments and workspaces of individual workers with different gender and races, there is a decrease in participants within groups of low-wage workers in worker health promotion programs. Complexities vary to low wage earners contributing to largely part-time earners, wage and benefits distribution, and hazardous field of work. [35]

Suggestions to improve worker participation in low wage industries include convenience and better access. [36] To create worksite vaccinations and healthy diet options, increases the participation for preventive care in these industries. [36] An important factor to access on preventive or worker health promotion programs in low wage industries correlate to better health insurance coverage. The extension and improvement of the Affordable Care Act raises the incentive for both employees and employers to participate in preventive programs. [33] Extension to both full time and part time employees, increases coverage for hazardous work environments, and demographic equity. [35]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sitting</span> Resting position of human body weight, primarily supported by buttocks in contact with objects

Sitting is a basic action and resting position in which the body weight is supported primarily by the bony ischial tuberosities with the buttocks in contact with the ground or a horizontal surface such as a chair seat, instead of by the lower limbs as in standing, squatting or kneeling. When sitting, the torso is more or less upright, although sometimes it can lean against other objects for a more relaxed posture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Exercise</span> Bodily activity intended to improve health

Exercise is intentional physical activity to enhance or maintain fitness and overall health.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">White-collar worker</span> Social class; person who performs intellectual labor

A white-collar worker is a person who performs professional service, desk, managerial, or administrative work. White-collar work may be performed in an office or other administrative setting. White-collar workers include job paths related to government, consulting, academia, accountancy, business and executive management, customer support, design, economics, engineering, market research, finance, human resources, operations research, marketing, public relations, information technology, networking, law, healthcare, architecture, and research and development. In contrast: blue-collar workers perform manual labor or work in skilled trades; pink-collar workers work in care, health care, social work, or teaching; and grey-collar jobs combine manual labor and skilled trades with non-manual or managerial duties.

Stress management consists of a wide spectrum of techniques and psychotherapies aimed at controlling a person's level of stress, especially chronic stress, usually for the purpose of improving everyday functioning. Stress produces numerous physical and mental symptoms which vary according to each individual's situational factors. These can include a decline in physical health, such as headaches, chest pain, fatigue, and sleep problems, as well as depression. The process of stress management is named as one of the keys to a happy and successful life in modern society. Life often delivers numerous demands that can be difficult to handle, but stress management provides a number of ways to manage anxiety and maintain overall well-being.

Absenteeism is a habitual pattern of absence from a duty or obligation without good reason. Generally, absenteeism refers to unplanned absences. Absenteeism has been viewed as an indicator of poor individual performance, as well as a breach of an implicit contract between employee and employer. It is seen as a management problem, and framed in economic or quasi-economic terms. More recent scholarship seeks to understand absenteeism as an indicator of psychological, medical, or social adjustment to work.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sedentary lifestyle</span> Type of lifestyle involving little or no physical activity

Sedentary lifestyle is a lifestyle type, in which one is physically inactive and does little or no physical movement and/or exercise. A person living a sedentary lifestyle is often sitting or lying down while engaged in an activity like socializing, watching TV, playing video games, reading or using a mobile phone or computer for much of the day. A sedentary lifestyle contributes to poor health quality, diseases as well as many preventable causes of death.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Physical activity</span> Any voluntarily bodily motion produced by skeletal muscles and requires energy expenditure

Physical activity is defined as any voluntary bodily movement produced by skeletal muscles that requires energy expenditure. Physical activity encompasses all activities, at any intensity, performed during any time of day or night. It includes both exercise and incidental activity integrated into daily routine. This integrated activity may not be planned, structured, repetitive or purposeful for the improvement of fitness, and may include activities such as walking to the local shop, cleaning, working, active transport etc. Lack of physical activity is associated with a range of negative health outcomes, whereas increased physical activity can improve physical and mental health, as well as cognitive and cardiovascular health. There are at least eight investments that work to increase population-level physical activity, including whole-of-school programmes, active transport, active urban design, healthcare, public education and mass media, sport for all, workplaces and community-wide programmes. Physical activity increases energy expenditure and is a key regulator in controlling body weight.

Health promotion is, as stated in the 1986 World Health Organization (WHO) Ottawa Charter for Health Promotion, the "process of enabling people to increase control over, and to improve their health."

Workplace wellness, also known as corporate wellbeing outside the United States, is a broad term used to describe activities, programs, and/or organizational policies designed to support healthy behavior in the workplace. This often involves health education, medical screenings, weight management programs, and onsite fitness programs or facilities. It can also include flex-time for exercise, providing onsite kitchen and eating areas, offering healthy food options in vending machines, holding "walk and talk" meetings, and offering financial and other incentives for participation.

<i>Booster Breaks</i>

Booster Breaks: Improving Employee Health One Break at a Time is a 2010 book. Booster breaks are defined as: "organized, routine work breaks intended to improve physical and psychological health, enhance job satisfaction, and sustain or increase work productivity." Dr. Wendell C. Taylor is recognized as the architect of the Booster Break concept. The intent of Booster Breaks is to encourage health-enhancing breaks during the work day as a corrective to job stress and sedentary behavior. Examples of Booster Breaks are physical activity, meditation, or breath training. Even for brief sessions of 10 to 15 minutes, a routine practice of any of the preceding examples can produce physical, psychological, and/or mental benefits.

Occupational rehabilitation is the science and practices of returning injured workers to a level of daily work activities that is appropriate to their functional and cognitive capacity related to their position of which may be influenced by the severity of a worker's injuries.

A health risk assessment is a questionnaire about a person's medical history, demographic characteristics and lifestyle. It is one of the most widely used screening tools in the field of health promotion and is often the first step in multi-component health promotion programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Occupational stress</span> Tensions related to work

Occupational stress is psychological stress related to one's job. Occupational stress refers to a chronic condition. Occupational stress can be managed by understanding what the stressful conditions at work are and taking steps to remediate those conditions. Occupational stress can occur when workers do not feel supported by supervisors or coworkers, feel as if they have little control over the work they perform, or find that their efforts on the job are incommensurate with the job's rewards. Occupational stress is a concern for both employees and employers because stressful job conditions are related to employees' emotional well-being, physical health, and job performance. The World Health Organization and the International Labour Organization conducted a study. The results showed that exposure to long working hours, operates through increased psycho-social occupational stress. It is the occupational risk factor with the largest attributable burden of disease, according to these official estimates causing an estimated 745,000 workers to die from ischemic heart disease and stroke events in 2016.

A lifestyle management programme is an intervention designed to promote positive lifestyle and behaviour change and is widely used in the field of health promotion.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Zest (positive psychology)</span> Zest for living

In positive psychology, zest is among the discrete strengths people possess. Having zest means treating life as an adventure and feeling motivated in challenging situations. People with zest display enthusiasm, excitement, and energy as they tackle life's tasks. Zest is a component of the virtue of courage in some positive psychology paradigms.

Occupational health nursing is a specialty nursing practice that provides for and delivers health and safety programs and services to workers, worker populations, and community groups. The practice focuses on promotion, maintenance and restoration of health, prevention of illness and injury, and protection from work‐related and environmental hazards. Occupational health nurses (OHNs) aim to combine knowledge of health and business to balance safe and healthful work environments and a "healthy" bottom line.

Total Worker Health is a trademarked strategy defined as policies, programs, and practices that integrate protection from work-related safety and health hazards with promotion of injury and illness prevention efforts to advance worker well-being. It was conceived and is funded by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Total Worker Health is tested and developed in six Centers of Excellence for Total Worker Health in the United States.

A psychosocial hazard or work stressor is any occupational hazard related to the way work is designed, organized and managed, as well as the economic and social contexts of work. Unlike the other three categories of occupational hazard, they do not arise from a physical substance, object, or hazardous energy.

The benefits of physical activity range widely. Most types of physical activity improve health and well-being.

Psychosocial safety climate (PSC) is a term used in organisational psychology that refers to the shared belief held by workers that their psychological health and safety is protected and supported by senior management. PSC builds on other work stress theories and concerns the corporate climate for worker psychological health and safety. Studies have found that a favourable PSC is associated with low rates of absenteeism and high productivity, while a poor climate is linked to high levels of workplace stress and job dissatisfaction. PSC can be promoted by organisational practices, policies and procedures that prioritise the psychosocial safety and wellbeing of workers. The theory has implications for the design of workplaces for the best possible outcomes for both workers and management.

References

  1. 1 2 3 "Luxembourg Declaration on Workplace health promotion in the European Union" (PDF). January 2007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2018-10-08.
  2. "Workplace health promotion". WHO. Archived from the original on October 23, 2004.
  3. Burton J (2010). WHO Healthy workplace framework and model: Background and supporting literature and practices (PDF). World Health Organization. ISBN   978-92-4-150024-1.
  4. Chu C, Breucker G, Harris N, Stitzel A, Gan X, Gu X, Dwyer S (June 2000). "Health-promoting workplaces—international settings development". Health Promotion International. 15 (2): 155–67. doi: 10.1093/heapro/15.2.155 . hdl: 10072/3373 .
  5. Hassard, J (2012). "Motivation for employers to carry out workplace health promotion." European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  6. 1 2 Aldana SG (2001). "Financial impact of health promotion programs: a comprehensive review of the literature". American Journal of Health Promotion. 15 (5): 296–320. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-15.5.296. PMID   11502012. S2CID   46879290.
  7. Watson, Towers (2011). "Employee Engagement and Health Plan Management." Towers Watson. Retrieved 9 February 2016.
  8. 1 2 Goetzel RZ, Henke RM, Tabrizi M, Pelletier KR, Loeppke R, Ballard DW, et al. (September 2014). "Do workplace health promotion (wellness) programs work?". Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 56 (9): 927–34. doi:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000276. PMID   25153303. S2CID   34408756.
  9. Gebhardt DL, Crump C (February 1990). "Employee fitness and wellness programs in the workplace". The American Psychologist. 45 (2): 262–72. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.45.2.262. PMID   2178506.
  10. Batt ME (January 2009). "Physical activity interventions in the workplace: the rationale and future direction for workplace wellness". British Journal of Sports Medicine. 43 (1): 47–8. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2008.053488. PMID   18971246. S2CID   29034074.
  11. McGillivray D (June 2005). "Fitter, Happier, More Productive: Governing Working Bodies Through Wellness". Culture and Organization. 11 (2): 125–38. doi:10.1080/14759550500091036. S2CID   218543191.
  12. 1 2 3 Abraham JM, Feldman R, Nyman JA, Barleen N (2011). "What factors influence participation in an exercise-focused, employer-based wellness program?". Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing. 48 (3): 221–41. doi:10.5034/inquiryjrnl_48.03.01. PMID   22235547. S2CID   8766040.
  13. 1 2 Erickson JA, Gillespie CW (January 2000). "Reasons women discontinued participation in an exercise and wellness program". Physical Educator. 57 (1): 2–7.
  14. 1 2 Pohjonen T, Ranta R (June 2001). "Effects of worksite physical exercise intervention on physical fitness, perceived health status, and work ability among home care workers: five-year follow-up". Preventive Medicine. 32 (6): 465–75. doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0837. PMID   11394950.
  15. 1 2 Carr LJ, Walaska KA, Marcus BH (May 2012). "Feasibility of a portable pedal exercise machine for reducing sedentary time in the workplace". British Journal of Sports Medicine. 46 (6): 430–5. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2010.079574. PMID   21324889. S2CID   3824698.
  16. 1 2 Lara A, Yancey AK, Tapia-Conye R, Flores Y, Kuri-Morales P, Mistry R, Subirats E, McCarthy WJ (January 2008). "Pausa para tu Salud: reduction of weight and waistlines by integrating exercise breaks into workplace organizational routine". Preventing Chronic Disease. 5 (1): A12. PMC   2248785 . PMID   18082001.
  17. Chan CB, Ryan DA, Tudor-Locke C (December 2004). "Health benefits of a pedometer-based physical activity intervention in sedentary workers". Preventive Medicine. 39 (6): 1215–22. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.053. PMID   15539058.
  18. Eves FF, Webb OJ, Mutrie N (December 2006). "A workplace intervention to promote stair climbing: greater effects in the overweight". Obesity. 14 (12): 2210–6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.259 . PMID   17189548. S2CID   6556617.
  19. Gibbs S (19 June 2015). "Is "Corporate Wellness" the Big New Thing That Will Keep Fitbit Ahead of the Pack?". The Guardian.
  20. Palumbo MV, Wu G, Shaner-McRae H, Rambur B, McIntosh B (February 2012). "Tai Chi for older nurses: a workplace wellness pilot study". Applied Nursing Research. 25 (1): 54–9. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2010.01.002. PMC   3029490 . PMID   20974089.
  21. 1 2 Baicker K, Cutler D, Song Z (February 2010). "Workplace wellness programs can generate savings". Health Affairs. 29 (2): 304–11. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0626. PMID   20075081.
  22. 1 2 Cawley J, Price JA (September 2013). "A case study of a workplace wellness program that offers financial incentives for weight loss". Journal of Health Economics. 32 (5): 794–803. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2013.04.005. PMID   23787373.
  23. Wolf K (2008). "Health and productivity management in Europe". International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 1 (2): 136–144. doi:10.1108/17538350810893928.
  24. Hemp P (October 2004). "Presenteeism: at work--but out of it" (PDF). Harvard Business Review. 82 (10): 49–58, 155. PMID   15559575.
  25. Navarro C, Bass C (December 2006). "The cost of employee absenteeism". Compensation & Benefits Review. 38 (6): 26–30. doi:10.1177/0886368706295343. S2CID   154819397.
  26. Mitchell RJ, Bates P (April 2011). "Measuring health-related productivity loss". Population Health Management. 14 (2): 93–8. doi:10.1089/pop.2010.0014. PMC   3128441 . PMID   21091370.
  27. Gowrisankaran G, Norberg K, Kymes S, Chernew ME, Stwalley D, Kemper L, Peck W (March 2013). "A hospital system's wellness program linked to health plan enrollment cut hospitalizations but not overall costs". Health Affairs. 32 (3): 477–85. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0090. PMID   23459726.
  28. Lerner D, Rodday AM, Cohen JT, Rogers WH (February 2013). "A systematic review of the evidence concerning the economic impact of employee-focused health promotion and wellness programs". Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 55 (2): 209–22. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182728d3c. PMID   23287723. S2CID   205723731.
  29. Conn VS, Hafdahl AR, Cooper PS, Brown LM, Lusk SL (October 2009). "Meta-analysis of workplace physical activity interventions". American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 37 (4): 330–9. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2009.06.008. PMC   2758638 . PMID   19765506.
  30. Burton JP, Hoobler JM, Scheuer ML (September 2012). "Supervisor workplace stress and abusive supervision: The buffering effect of exercise". Journal of Business and Psychology. 27 (3): 271–9. doi:10.1007/s10869-011-9255-0. S2CID   73652151.
  31. Van Rooy K, Sutherland S, Squillace M (January 2013). Mayo Clinic's Mindful Movements in the Workplace. ASSE Professional Development Conference and Exposition. American Society of Safety Engineers.
  32. White K, Jacques PH (March 2007). "Combined diet and exercise intervention in the workplace: effect on cardiovascular disease risk factors". AAOHN Journal. 55 (3): 109–14. doi:10.1177/216507990705500303. PMID   17405587. S2CID   28671111.
  33. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Hammerback K, Hannon PA, Harris JR, Clegg-Thorp C, Kohn M, Parrish A (2015-07-01). "Perspectives on Workplace Health Promotion Among Employees in Low-Wage Industries". American Journal of Health Promotion. 29 (6): 384–92. doi:10.4278/ajhp.130924-QUAL-495. PMC   5070972 . PMID   25162321.
  34. Carter M, Gaskins S, Shaw L (June 2005). "Employee Wellness Program in a small rural industry: employee evaluation". AAOHN Journal. 53 (6): 244–8. doi: 10.1177/216507990505300604 . PMID   16018536. S2CID   36157318.
  35. 1 2 3 Stiehl E, Shivaprakash N, Thatcher E, Ornelas IJ, Kneipp S, Baron SL, Muramatsu N (February 2018). "Worksite Health Promotion for Low-Wage Workers: A Scoping Literature Review". American Journal of Health Promotion. 32 (2): 359–373. doi:10.1177/0890117117728607. PMC   5770241 . PMID   28893085.
  36. 1 2 3 Kristal T, Cohen Y, Navot E (2018-07-19). "Benefit Inequality among American Workers by Gender, Race, and Ethnicity, 1982–2015". Sociological Science. 5: 461–488. doi: 10.15195/v5.a20 . ISSN   2330-6696.