Bakhshali manuscript

Last updated

Bakhshali manuscript
Bodleian Library, University of Oxford
Bakhshali manuscript.jpg
One of the Bakhshali manuscripts.
TypeMathematical text
DateAD 224–383/ 885–993 (proposed carbon-dates, recently disputed on methodological grounds: Plofker et al. 2017, [1] Houben 2018 §3 [2] )
Place of origin Bakhshali, Pakistan
Language(s) Sanskrit with influence from local dialects
MaterialBirch bark
FormatSeventy leaves
ConditionToo fragile to be handled [3]
Script Sharada script
Contentsmaths text
Discovered1881

The Bakhshali manuscript is an ancient Indian mathematical text written on birch bark that was found in 1881 in the village of Bakhshali, Mardan (near Peshawar in present-day Pakistan, historical Gandhara). It is perhaps "the oldest extant manuscript in Indian mathematics". [4] For some portions a carbon-date was proposed of AD 224–383 while for other portions a carbon-date as late as AD 885–993 in a recent study, but the dating has been criticised by specialists on methodological grounds (Plofker et al. 2017 [1] and Houben 2018 §3 [2] ). The manuscript contains the earliest known Indian use of a zero symbol. [5] [6] It is written in a form of literary Sanskrit influenced by contemporary dialects.

Contents

Discovery

The manuscript was unearthed in British India from a field in 1881, [7] by a peasant in the village of Bakhshali, which is near Mardan, in present-day Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. [4] The first research on the manuscript was done by A. F. R. Hoernlé. [4] [8] After his death, it was examined by G.R.Kaye, who edited the work and published it as a book in 1927. [9]

The extant manuscript is incomplete, consisting of seventy leaves of birch bark, [4] [7] whose intended order is not known. [4] It is kept at the Bodleian Library at the University of Oxford [4] [7] (MS. Sansk. d. 14), though folio are periodically loaned to museums. [10]

Contents

The numerals used in the Bakhshali manuscript, dated to sometime between the 3rd and 7th century AD. Bakhshali numerals 2.jpg
The numerals used in the Bakhshali manuscript, dated to sometime between the 3rd and 7th century AD.

The manuscript is a compendium of rules and illustrative examples. Each example is stated as a problem, the solution is described, and it is verified that the problem has been solved. The sample problems are in verse and the commentary is in prose associated with calculations. The problems involve arithmetic, algebra and geometry, including mensuration. The topics covered include fractions, square roots, arithmetic and geometric progressions, solutions of simple equations, simultaneous linear equations, quadratic equations and indeterminate equations of the second degree. [9] [11]

Composition

The manuscript is written in an earlier form of Sharada script, a script which is known for having been in use mainly from the 8th to the 12th century in the northwestern part of South Asia, such as Kashmir and neighbouring regions. [4] The language of the manuscript, [lower-alpha 1] though intended to be Sanskrit, was significantly influenced in its phonetics and morphology by a local artist dialect or dialects, and some of the resultant linguistic peculiarities of the text are shared with Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit. The overlying dialects, though sharing affinities with Apabhraṃśa and with Old Kashmiri, have not been identified precisely. [12] It is probable that most of the rules and examples had been originally composed in Sanskrit, while one of the sections was written entirely in a dialect. [13] It is possible that the manuscript might be a compilation of fragments from different works composed in a number of language varieties. [12] Hayashi admits that some of the irregularities are due to errors by scribes or may be orthographical. [14]

A colophon to one of the sections states that it was written by a brahmin identified as "the son of Chajaka", a "king of calculators," for the use of Vasiṣṭha's son Hasika. The brahmin might have been the author of the commentary as well as the scribe of the manuscript. [11] Near the colophon appears a broken word rtikāvati, which has been interpreted as the place Mārtikāvata mentioned by Varāhamihira as being in northwestern India (along with Takṣaśilā , Gandhāra etc.), the supposed place where the manuscript might have been written. [4]

Mathematics

The manuscript is a compilation of mathematical rules and examples (in verse), and prose commentaries on these verses. [4] Typically, a rule is given, with one or more examples, where each example is followed by a "statement" (nyāsa / sthāpanā) of the example's numerical information in tabular form, then a computation that works out the example by following the rule step-by-step while quoting it, and finally a verification to confirm that the solution satisfies the problem. [4] This is a style similar to that of Bhāskara I's commentary on the gaṇita (mathematics) chapter of the Āryabhaṭīya, including the emphasis on verification that became obsolete in later works. [4]

The rules are algorithms and techniques for a variety of problems, such as systems of linear equations, quadratic equations, arithmetic progressions and arithmetico-geometric series, computing square roots approximately, dealing with negative numbers (profit and loss), measurement such as of the fineness of gold, etc. [7]

Numerals and zero

Bakhshali manuscript, detail of the numeral "zero". Bakhshali manuscript zero detail.jpg
Bakhshali manuscript, detail of the numeral "zero".

The Bakhshali manuscript uses numerals with a place-value system, using a dot as a place holder for zero. [15] [6] The dot symbol came to be called the shunya-bindu (literally, the dot of the empty place). References to the concept are found in Subandhu's Vasavadatta , which has been dated between 385 and 465 by the scholar Maan Singh. [16]

Prior to the 2017 carbon dating, a 9th-century inscription of zero on the wall of a temple in Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, was once thought to be the oldest Indian use of a zero symbol. [6]

Date

In 2017, samples from 3 folios of the corpus were radiocarbon dated to three different centuries and empires, from AD 224–383 (Indo-Scythian), 680–779 (Turk Shahis), and 885–993 (Saffarid dynasty). If the dates are valid, it is not known how folios from different centuries came to be collected and buried. [5] [17] [6]

The publication of the radio carbon dates, initially via non-academic media, led Kim Plofker, Agathe Keller, Takao Hayashi, Clemency Montelle and Dominik Wujastyk to publicly object to the library making the dates globally available, usurping academic precedence:

We express regret that the Bodleian Library kept their carbon-dating findings embargoed for many months, and then chose a newspaper press-release and YouTube as media for a first communication of these technical and historical matters. The Library thus bypassed standard academic channels that would have permitted serious collegial discussion and peer review prior to public announcements. While the excitement inspired by intriguing discoveries benefits our field and scholarly research in general, the confusion generated by broadcasting over-eager and carelessly inferred conclusions, with their inevitable aftermath of caveats and disputes, does not.

— Plofker et al., The Bakhshālī Manuscript: A Response to the Bodleian Library’s Radiocarbon Dating, 2017 [18]

Referring to the detailed reconsideration of the evidence by Plofker et al., Sanskrit scholar, Jan Houben remarked:

"If the finding that samples of the same manuscript would be centuries apart is not based on mistakes ... there are still some factors that have evidently been overlooked by the Bodleian research team: the well-known divergence in exposure to cosmic radiation at different altitudes and the possible variation in background radiation due to the presence of certain minerals in exposed, mountainous rock have nowhere been taken into account." [2]

Prior to the proposed radiocarbon dates of the 2017 study, most scholars agreed that the physical manuscript was a copy of a more ancient text, whose date had to be estimated partly on the basis of its content. Hoernlé thought that the manuscript was from the 9th century, but the original was from the 3rd or 4th century. [lower-alpha 2] Indian scholars assigned it an earlier date. Datta assigned it to the "early centuries of the Christian era". [9] Channabasappa dated it to AD 200–400, on the grounds that it uses mathematical terminology different from that of Aryabhata. [20] Hayashi noted some similarities between the manuscript and Bhaskara I's work (AD 629), and said that it was "not much later than Bhaskara I". [4]

To settle the date of the Bakhshali manuscript, language use and especially palaeography are other major parameters to be taken into account. In this context Houben observed: "it is difficult to derive a linear chronological difference from the observed linguistic variation," and therefore it is necessary to "take quite seriously the judgement of palaeographists such as Richard Salomon who observed that, what he teleologically called “Proto-Śāradā,” “first emerged around the middle of the seventh century” (Salomon 1998: 40). This excludes the earlier dates attributed to manuscript folios on which a fully developed form of Śāradā appears." [2]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Variously described either as an "irregular Sanskrit" (Kaye 2004, p. 11), or as the so-called Gāthā dialect, the literary form of the Northwestern Prakrit, which combined elements of Sanskrit and Prakrit and whose use as a literary language predated the adoption of Classical Sanskrit for this purposely.(Hoernle 1887, p. 10)
  2. ↑ G. R. Kaye, on the other hand, thought in 1927 that the work was composed in the 12th century, [4] [9] but this was discounted in recent scholarship. G. G. Joseph wrote, "It is particularly unfortunate that Kaye is still quoted as an authority on Indian mathematics." [19]

Related Research Articles

Vāgbhaṭa (वाग्भट) was one of the most influential writers of Ayurveda. Several works are associated with his name as author, principally the Ashtāṅgasaṅgraha (अष्टाङ्गसंग्रह) and the Ashtāngahridayasaṃhitā (अष्टाङ्गहृदयसंहिता). The best current research, however, argues in detail that these two works cannot be the product of a single author. Indeed, the whole question of the relationship of these two works, and their authorship, is very difficult and still far from solution. Both works make frequent reference to the earlier classical works, the Charaka Samhita and the Sushruta Samhita. Vāgbhaṭa is said, in the closing verses of the Ashtāṅgasaṅgraha to have been the son of Simhagupta and pupil of Avalokita. His works mention worship of cattle and Brahmanas and various Hindu gods and goddesses, he also begins with a note on how Ayurveda evolved from Brahma and Sarasvati. His work contains syncretic elements.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bower Manuscript</span> Collection of Buddhist and Ayurvedic manuscripts found in northwestern China

The Bower Manuscript is a collection of seven fragmentary Buddhist Hybrid Sanskrit treatises found buried in a Buddhist memorial stupa near Kucha, northwestern China. Written in early Gupta script on birch bark, it is variously dated in 5th to early 6th century. The Bower manuscript includes the oldest dated fragments of an Indian medical text, the Navanitaka.

Nārāyaṇa Paṇḍita (1340–1400) was an Indian mathematician. Plofker writes that his texts were the most significant Sanskrit mathematics treatises after those of Bhaskara II, other than the Kerala school. He wrote the Ganita Kaumudi in 1356 about mathematical operations. The work anticipated many developments in combinatorics.

Indian mathematics emerged in the Indian subcontinent from 1200 BCE until the end of the 18th century. In the classical period of Indian mathematics, important contributions were made by scholars like Aryabhata, Brahmagupta, Bhaskara II, and Varāhamihira. The decimal number system in use today was first recorded in Indian mathematics. Indian mathematicians made early contributions to the study of the concept of zero as a number, negative numbers, arithmetic, and algebra. In addition, trigonometry was further advanced in India, and, in particular, the modern definitions of sine and cosine were developed there. These mathematical concepts were transmitted to the Middle East, China, and Europe and led to further developments that now form the foundations of many areas of mathematics.

The Hindu–Arabic numeral system is a decimal place-value numeral system that uses a zero glyph as in "205".

Śrīdhara or Śrīdharācārya was an Indian mathematician believed to come either from the Bengal region or from South India. Very little is known about his life beyond the content of his two extant treatises about arithmetic, Pāṭī-gaṇita and Tri-śatikā. He was mentioned by Bhāskara II, and made apparent reference to Brahmagupta. Govindasvāmin quoted a passage also found in Tri-śatikā, and overlapping material is found in the work of Mahāvīra, from which historians estimate Śrīdhara to have lived in the 8th or 9th century.

<i>Sushruta Samhita</i> Ancient Sanskrit medical compendium

The Sushruta Samhita is an ancient Sanskrit text on medicine and surgery, and one of the most important such treatises on this subject to survive from the ancient world. The Compendium of Suśruta is one of the foundational texts of Ayurveda, alongside the Charaka-Saṃhitā, the Bhela-Saṃhitā, and the medical portions of the Bower Manuscript. It is one of the two foundational Hindu texts on the medical profession that have survived from ancient India.

Atreya (आत्रेय) Rishi, or Atreya Punarvasu, was a descendant of Atri, one of the great Hindu sages (rishis) whose accomplishments are detailed in the Puranas. Sage Atreya was a renowned scholar of Ayurveda, and a school of early Ayurveda was founded based on his teachings.

The Lokavibhāga is a Jain cosmological text originally composed in Prakrit by a Digambara monk, Sarvanandi, surviving in a later Sanskrit translation by one Siṃhasūri. It the oldest known Indian source to use zero as number. Surviving manuscripts of the Lokavibhāga are listed in v.26 of the New Catalogus Catalogorum. Parts of the Bakhshali Manuscript on arithmetic, which does use a physically written symbol for zero, have been carbon-dated, but the results of this dating are puzzling and are still being debated.

<i>Siddhānta Shiromani</i> Book by Bhaskara II

Siddhānta Śiromaṇi is the major treatise of Indian mathematician Bhāskara II. He wrote the Siddhānta Śiromaṇi in 1150 when he was 36 years old. The work is composed in Sanskrit Language in 1450 verses.

Kim Leslie Plofker is an American historian of mathematics, specializing in Indian mathematics.

Clemency Montelle is a New Zealand historian of mathematics known for her research on Indian mathematics and Indian astronomy. She is a professor of mathematics at the University of Canterbury, and a fellow of the New Zealand India Research Institute of the Victoria University of Wellington.

Mathematics in India: 500 BCE–1800 CE is a monograph about the history of Indian mathematics. It was written by American historian of mathematics Kim Plofker, and published in 2009 by the Princeton University Press. The Basic Library List Committee of the Mathematical Association of America has classified the book as essential for undergraduate mathematics libraries, their highest rating.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gaṇeśa Daivajna</span> 16th century Indian astronomer

Gaṇeśa Daivajna was a sixteenth century astronomer, astrologer, and mathematician from western India who wrote books on methods to predict eclipses, planetary conjunctions, positions, and make calculations for calendars. His most major work was the Grahalaghava which was included ephemeris and calendar calculations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ataullah Rashidi</span>

'Ataullah Rushdi bin Ahmad Ma'mar was a 17th-century architect and a mathematics writer from the Mughal Empire of present-day India. He designed the Bibi Ka Maqbara at Aurangabad and some buildings at Shahjahanabad. As a mathematics writer, he translated the Arabic-language Khulasat al-Hisab and the Sanskrit-language Bijaganita into Persian.

Karana-kutuhala is a 1183 CE Sanskrit-language book on jyotisha by Bhaskara II, a mathematician-astronomer from present-day India.

Keshava was an astrologer and astronomer from Nandigrama in present-day western India.

Takao Hayashi is a Japanese mathematics educator, historian of mathematics specializing in Indian mathematics. Hayashi was born in Niigata, Japan. He obtained Bachelor of Science degree form Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan in 1974, Master of Arts degree from Tohuku University, Sendai, Japan in 1976 and a postgraduate degree from Kyoto University, Japan in 1979. He secured the Doctor of Philosophy degree from Brown University, USA in 1985 under the guidance of David Pingree. He was a researcher at Mehta Research Institute for Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Allahabad, India during 1982–1983, a lecturer at Kyoto Women's College during 1985–1987. He joined Doshisha University, Kyoto as a lecturer in history of science in 1986 and was promoted as professor in 1995. He has also worked in various universities in Japan in different capacities.

<i>Makarandasarini</i>

Makarandasāriṇi is a Sanskrit astronomical table text composed by the Indian astronomer-mathematician Makaranda (c.1438-1478) hailing from Varanasi. In the Sanskrit astronomical literature such table texts are referred to as sāriṇi-s or koṣṭhaka-s. It is one of the most popular such texts ever composed in Sanskrit.

<i>Mahadevi</i> (astronomy book)

Mahādevī is a Sanskrit astronomical table text composed by the Indian astronomer-mathematician Mahādeva around the year 1316 CE. Since its composition, it has become the standard astronomical table among astronomers, astrologers and calendar makers in the Brāhma-pakṣa school. In view of the fact that more than a hundred manuscripts of the work have been unearthed, which is by far more numerous than the surviving manuscripts of any earlier koṣṭhaka, the word by which such table texts are referred to in Sanskrit, Mahādevī has been described as the "first 'canonical' koṣṭhaka". In the history of studies on Sanskrit astronomical table texts, Mahādevī was the first such text to be subjected to a systematic analysis using modern mathematical tools.

References

  1. 1 2 Plofker, Kim, Agathe Keller, Takao Hayashi, Clemency Montelle, and Dominik Wujastyk. 2017. "The Bakhshālī Manuscript: A Response to the Bodleian Library’s Radiocarbon Dating.” History of Science in South Asia, 5.1: 134–150. https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/hssa/index.php/hssa/article/view/22
  2. 1 2 3 4 Jan E.M. Houben "Linguistic Paradox and Diglossia: on the emergence of Sanskrit and Sanskritic language in Ancient India." De Gruyter Open Linguistics (Topical Issue on Historical Sociolinguistic Philology, ed. by Chiara Barbati and Christian Gastgeber.) OPLI – Vol. 4, issue 1: 1–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0001
  3. ↑ All the pages have been photographed which are available in the book by Hayashi
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Takao Hayashi (2008), "Bakhshālī Manuscript", in Helaine Selin (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the History of Science, Technology, and Medicine in Non-Western Cultures, vol. 1, Springer, pp. B1–B3, ISBN   9781402045592
  5. 1 2 Devlin, Hannah (13 September 2017). "Much ado about nothing: ancient Indian text contains earliest zero symbol". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 14 September 2017.
  6. 1 2 3 4 "Carbon dating finds Bakhshali manuscript contains oldest recorded origins of the symbol 'zero'". Bodleian Libraries. 14 September 2017. Retrieved 13 January 2023.
  7. 1 2 3 4 John Newsome Crossley; Anthony Wah-Cheung Lun; Kangshen Shen; Shen Kangsheng (1999). The Nine Chapters on the Mathematical Art: Companion and Commentary. Oxford University Press. ISBN   0-19-853936-3.
  8. ↑ Hoernle 1887.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Bibhutibhusan Datta (1929). "Book Review: G. R. Kaye, The Bakhshâlî Manuscript—A Study in Mediaeval Mathematics, 1927". Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 35 (4): 579–580.
  10. ↑ "London museum showcases India's contribution to science". www.thehindubusinessline.com. Retrieved 3 February 2022.
  11. 1 2 Plofker, Kim (2009), Mathematics in India, Princeton University Press, p. 158, ISBN   978-0-691-12067-6
  12. 1 2 Hayashi 1995, p. 54.
  13. ↑ Section VII 11, corresponding to folio 46v.( Hayashi 1995 , p. 54)
  14. ↑ Hayashi 1995, p. 26.
  15. ↑ J. J. O'Connor; E. F. Robertson (November 2000). "A history of zero". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive . Retrieved 24 July 2022.
  16. ↑ Singh, Maan (1993). Subandhu, New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, ISBN   81-7201-509-7, pp. 9–11.
  17. ↑ Mason, Robyn (14 September 2017). "Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit dates the world's oldest recorded origin of the zero symbol". School of Archaeology, University of Oxford. Archived from the original on 14 September 2017. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
  18. ↑ Plofker, Kim; Keller, Agathe; Hayashi, Takao; Montelle, Clemency; Wujastyk, Dominik (6 October 2017). "The Bakhshālī Manuscript: A Response to the Bodleian Library's Radiocarbon Dating". History of Science in South Asia. 5 (1): 134–150. doi: 10.18732/H2XT07 . ISSN   2369-775X.
  19. ↑ Joseph, G. G. (2000), The Crest of the Peacock, non-European roots of Mathematics, Princeton University Press, pp. 215–216
  20. ↑ J. J. O'Connor; E. F. Robertson (November 2000). "The Bakhshali manuscript". MacTutor History of Mathematics archive. Archived from the original on 9 August 2007. Retrieved 24 July 2022.

Bibliography

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.