1839 Massachusetts gubernatorial election

Last updated

1839 Massachusetts gubernatorial election
Flag of Massachusetts.svg
  1838 November 11, 1839 1840  
Turnout16.72% Decrease2.svg 1.33 [1]
  Marcus Morton.jpg Edward Everett, 1794-1865, three-quarter length portrait, standing, facing left (cropped closein 3x4).jpg
Nominee Marcus Morton Edward Everett
Party Democratic Whig
Popular vote51,03450,725
Percentage50.001%49.7%

Governor before election

Edward Everett
Whig

Elected Governor

Marcus Morton
Democratic

The 1839 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was a tightly contested race won by Marcus Morton. Under Massachusetts law at the time, a majority of the votes cast was required to win, and Morton received exactly half the votes cast. Despite the presence of some irregularities, incumbent Whig Governor Edward Everett refused to contest the results once a legislative committee dominated by his party accepted a report giving Morton 51,034 votes out of 102,066 cast.

Contents

Background

In the 19th century Massachusetts held annual elections for its statewide elective offices. From 1825 to 1838 a succession of National Republican and then Whig politicians won the governor's seat, at first by wide margins, and only later in the 1830s by narrower margins. The principal opponent of the Whigs was Democratic candidate Marcus Morton, who ran for governor each year from 1828 to 1843.

Abolitionism became a significant political force in the mid-1830s in Massachusetts, even though both Whig and Democratic politicians sought to avoid the issue in pursuit of other political objectives. [2] Abolitionist activists attempted to force attention on the issue, demanding that candidates for office answer questionnaires on the subject. Marcus Morton was known to be personally opposed to slavery, but he did not often let the matter affect his politics, and expressed concern over abolitionist tactics. [3] His Whig opponent since 1835 was Edward Everett, who once gave a speech expressing sympathy for the property rights of slaveholders and was not seen as sympathetic to the abolitionist cause. [4] In the elections of 1837 and 1838 abolitionist support increased Morton's vote counts, but he was never able to achieve the majority of votes needed to win election in the state. [2]

General election

Candidates

Campaign

In the 1838 term, Governor Everett directed the Whig legislature to pass moral legislation, including a bill barring the imprisonment of debtors and a bill promoted by temperance activists that banned the sale of liquor in quantities less than 15 U.S. gallons (57 L). Everett also campaigned on the state's rapid economic recovery from the Panic of 1837 and an end to direct taxation. [5] Everett emphasized the debtor bill's effect on mariners, who had been excluded from previously debtor protection laws. [5] Everett also elaborated on his record of establishing and reforming state institutions: a state lunatic hospital, an improved penitentiary system, and a set-aside state education fund under the direction of Horace Mann. [5]

Despite the fact that their candidate was the first president of the American Temperance Society, Massachusetts Democrats led by George Bancroft argued that the liquor law was discriminatory against Catholic immigrants and poor urbanites. [6] Everett also drew opposition over a bill requiring volunteer militias to pay an annual fee of $5; as a result, a "military ticket" was nominated against Everett Whigs in many parts of the state. National politics, such as the independent treasury system issue, were largely left out of the opposition campaign. [7]

Results

The election was held on Monday, November 11, 1839. Early returns gave Everett the lead, although his showing in Boston, a Whig stronghold, was particularly weak. On November 14, the accumulated returns indicated that Everett led by 100 votes, with 250 communities still to report. The next day, Morton was reported to lead by just two votes. [8] A number of Whig officials (notably including Adjutant General of Massachusetts Henry A. S. Dearborn), failed to vote, prompting Everett to observe, despite their protestations that they supported his candidacy, "a better mode of showing [their support] would have been to vote". [9] A number of irregularities were identified during the initial count. The ballots from Easton had not been properly sealed by the town clerk, and the Winchendon return was dated 1809 instead of 1839. These votes were counted. [8]

The vote was so close that no result was certified until the legislature met. On January 1, 1840, the new Whig-dominated legislature met, and sent the election issue to a joint committee. [10] One ballot for Morton contained the scrawl "Maccus Mattoon"; despite efforts by Whig partisans to deny the writer intended to vote for Morton, no person with that name was found anywhere in the state. A more serious issue was raised with respect to the returns from Westfield: the town clerk there had not properly sworn to the accuracy of the result, and Everett was of the opinion that these results should be rejected. [11]

The legislative joint committee issued its report on January 13, 1840. It stated that a total of 102,066 votes had been cast (including all of the votes affected by the irregularities, which were accepted), and that therefore 51,034 votes were required to win. Morton was found to have received exactly that number, while Everett received 50,725, and a scattering of candidates received votes on the remaining 307 ballots cast. [11]

Massachusetts gubernatorial election of 1839
PartyCandidateVotes%±%
Democratic Marcus Morton 51,034 50.00% +5.51%
Whig Edward Everett (incumbent)50,72549.70%−5.27%
 Scattered votes3070.30%−0.24%
Majority3090.30%
Turnout 102,066100.00%
Democratic gain from Whig Swing +5.39%

Morton's victory was driven by a large increase in turnout that exclusively favored Democrats, rather than a defection from existing Whig voters. He won 169 towns and seven counties: Middlesex, Hampden, Berkshire, Norfolk, Bristol, and Dukes. Plymouth county narrowly flipped to Everett. Morton made heavy gains in Worcester, Middlesex, Essex, Suffolk, and Hampshire while the Whigs gained in Hampden, Norfolk, Bristol, Plymouth, and Nantucket. [12]

Aftermath

Despite pressure from partisans to contest this result, Everett refused. He recorded in his journal, "Principle is no longer sufficiently powerful even in Massachusetts to warrant an adherence to the strict provisions of the Constitution on a question of this kind." [11] Everett also refused to let his friend and Whig colleague Robert Charles Winthrop publish a partisan tribute to him, noting "I am willing to let the election go." [13] Morton was sworn in as governor on January 18, 1840. [11]

Although the Democrat won the governor's seat, the legislature remained firmly Whig. Fifteen of the 28 Senators who received a majority of the vote were Whigs, and Whig control of the House ensured that they would win the majority of the disputed seats. The Senate also re-elected George Hull, a Whig, as Lieutenant Governor. [14]

The Whig legislature refused to enact Morton's reformist agenda (in particular, it did not vote to repeal the 15-gallon law). The Whigs regrouped, and in 1840 Morton was defeated by John Davis. Morton won another single term in 1842, in a hotly contested election that was also decided by the state legislature.

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1840 United States presidential election</span> 14th quadrennial U.S. presidential election

The 1840 United States presidential election was the 14th quadrennial presidential election, held from Friday, October 30 to Wednesday, December 2, 1840. Economic recovery from the Panic of 1837 was incomplete, and Whig nominee William Henry Harrison defeated incumbent President Martin Van Buren of the Democratic Party. The election marked the first of two Whig victories in presidential elections, but was the only one where they won a majority of the popular vote. This was the third rematch in American history, which would not occur again until 1892.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Edward Everett</span> American politician, pastor, educator, diplomat and orator (1794–1865)

Edward Everett was an American politician, Unitarian pastor, educator, diplomat, and orator from Massachusetts. Everett, as a Whig, served as U.S. representative, U.S. senator, the 15th governor of Massachusetts, minister to Great Britain, and United States secretary of state. He also taught at Harvard University and served as its president.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marcus Morton</span> American jurist and politician

Marcus Morton was an American lawyer, jurist, and politician from Taunton, Massachusetts. He served two terms as Governor of Massachusetts and several months as Acting Governor following the death in 1825 of William Eustis. He served for 15 years as an associate justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, all the while running unsuccessfully as a Democrat for governor. He finally won the 1839 election, acquiring exactly the number of votes required for a majority win over Edward Everett. After losing the 1840 and 1841 elections, he was elected in a narrow victory in 1842.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John Davis (Massachusetts governor)</span> Massachusetts congressman and governor (1787–1854)

John Davis was an American lawyer, businessman and politician from Massachusetts. He spent 25 years in public service, serving in both houses of the United States Congress and for three non-consecutive years as Governor of Massachusetts. Because of his reputation for personal integrity he was known as "Honest John" Davis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Levi Lincoln Jr.</span> Massachusetts Governor and Congressman (1782–1868)

Levi Lincoln Jr. was an American lawyer and politician from Worcester, Massachusetts. He was the 13th Governor of Massachusetts (1825–1834) and represented the state in the U.S. Congress (1834–1841). Lincoln's nine-year tenure as governor is the longest consecutive service in state history; only Michael Dukakis, John Hancock and Caleb Strong served more years, but they were not consecutive.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">John H. Clifford</span> Massachusetts governor and attorney general (1809–1876)

John Henry Clifford was an American lawyer and politician from New Bedford, Massachusetts. He served as the state's attorney general for much of the 1850s, retaining the office during administrations dominated by three different political parties. A Whig, he was elected the state's 21st governor, serving a single term from 1853 to 1854. He was the first governor of Massachusetts not born in the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liberty Party (United States, 1840)</span> Political party in the 19th century United States

The Liberty Party was an abolitionist political party in the United States prior to the American Civil War. The party experienced its greatest activity during the 1840s, while remnants persisted as late as 1860. It supported James G. Birney in the presidential elections of 1840 and 1844. Other prominent figures connected with the Liberty Party included Gerrit Smith, Salmon P. Chase, Joshua Leavitt, Henry Highland Garnet, and John Greenleaf Whittier. The attempted to work within the federal system created by the United States Constitution to diminish the political influence of the Slave Power and advance the cause of universal emancipation and an integrated, egalitarian society.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1839–1840 United States Senate election in New York</span>

The 1839—1840 United States Senate election in New York was held on February 5, 1839 and January 14, 1840. Incumbent Senator Nathaniel P. Tallmadge was re-elected to a second term in office over scattered opposition.

The 1853–54 Massachusetts gubernatorial election consisted of an initial popular held on November 14, 1853, which was followed by a legislative vote that was conducted on January 9, 1854, which elected Whig Party nominee Emory Washburn. The ultimate task of electing the governor had been placed before the Massachusetts General Court because no candidate received the majority of the vote required for a candidate to be elected through the popular election.

The 1851–52 Massachusetts gubernatorial election consisted of an initial popular vote held on November 10, 1851, followed by a legislative vote conducted on January 12, 1852. Incumbent Democrat Governor George S. Boutwell was reelected to a second term in office. The ultimate task of electing the governor had been placed before the Massachusetts General Court because no candidate received the majority of the vote required for a candidate to be elected through the popular election.

The 1840 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on November 9.

The 1838 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on November 12.

The 1837 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on November 13.

The 1836 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on November 14.

The 1835 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on November 9.

The 1834 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on November 10.

The 1832 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on November 12.

The 1827 Massachusetts gubernatorial election was held on April 1.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1833–34 Massachusetts gubernatorial election</span> Gubernatorial elections were held in Massachusetts November 11, 1833

The 1833–34 Massachusetts gubernatorial election consisted of a popular election held on November 11, 1833, that was followed by a legislative vote held in January 1834. The ultimate task of electing the governor had been placed before the Massachusetts General Court because no candidate received the majority of the vote that was constitutionally required for a candidate to be elected through the popular election.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1839 Rhode Island gubernatorial election</span> Rhode Island gubernatorial election

The 1839 Rhode Island gubernatorial election was held on April 17, 1839.

References

  1. "Massachusetts gubernatorial election, 1839".
  2. 1 2 Earle 2000 , p. 72
  3. Earle 2000 , p. 71
  4. Earle 2000 , p. 70
  5. 1 2 3 Darling 1925, pp. 236–38.
  6. Darling 1925, pp. 239–40.
  7. Darling 1925, p. 242.
  8. 1 2 Frothingham 1925 , p. 151
  9. Frothingham 1925 , pp. 151–152
  10. Frothingham 1925 , p. 152
  11. 1 2 3 4 Frothingham 1925 , p. 153
  12. Darling 1925, p. 241.
  13. Frothingham 1925 , p. 154
  14. Darling 1925, p. 251.

Sources