Ukraine bioweapons conspiracy theory

Last updated

In March 2022, during the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Russian officials falsely claimed that public health facilities in Ukraine were "secret U.S.-funded biolabs" purportedly developing biological weapons, which was debunked as disinformation by multiple media outlets, scientific groups, and international bodies. [5] The claim was amplified by China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Chinese state media, [10] and was also promoted by followers of the QAnon conspiracy theory and subsequently supported by other far-right groups in the United States. [17]

Contents

Russian scientists, inside and outside Russia, have publicly accused the Russian government of lying about evidence for covert "bioweapons labs" in Ukraine, saying that documents presented by Russia's Defense Ministry describe pathogens collected for public health research. [18] The "bioweapons labs" claim has also been denied by the US, Ukraine, the United Nations, [12] [19] [4] and the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists . [3]

Both the U.S. and Ukraine have signed a treaty, the Biological Weapons Convention effectively banning biological and toxin weapons by prohibiting their development, production, acquisition, transfer, stockpiling and use.

Kremlin accusations and spread of conspiracy theory

Russian and Chinese officials and state media

Both Russian and Chinese officials have made accusations in attempt to boost the conspiracy theory. [7] [20] Russian proponents have included Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, United Russia leader Dmitry Medvedev, [21] the official Twitter account of the Russian embassy in Sarajevo, [22] and the Russian state-owned media outlets Sputnik and TASS. [23] [24] China's Foreign Affairs Ministry has asked for a "full account" of Ukraine's "biological military activities at home and abroad." [16]

On March 11, 2022, Russia called a meeting in the UN to discuss the allegations, which Reuters described as an attempt to re-assert the unproven allegations without evidence. This led the UN to say there was no evidence of a Ukraine biological weapons program, while the United States and its allies accused Russia of spreading the claim as a prelude to Russia potentially launching biological or chemical attacks. [25] [4]

In March 2022 a group of researchers from Moscow State University published an open letter in which they criticized the state media narratives and pointed out scientific inaccuracies in their postulates, such as "genetic weapons targeting exclusively Russians", which they described as "outright lie" and biological impossibility. They also discussed the "list of dangerous bacteria strains" published by Russia as "evidence for bioweapons program" and clarified that none of these strains were actually dangerous or used in biological weapons, and some of the strains, routinely used in biological research, were actually purchased by Ukraine from Russian companies. [26] [27]

In July 2022, two Russian State Duma members announced that a biolabs commission investigation found that Ukraine had administered drugs to its soldiers that "completely neutralize the last traces of human consciousness and turn them into the most cruel and deadly monsters", and that this was evidence that "this system for the control and creation of a cruel murder machine was implemented under the management of the United States". [28] [29]

United States and Russian Federation official inquiries

In June 2022 the Russian Federation, after presenting its own narrative across state media, filed official questions to the United States under article V of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC). The US's responses, published in August 2022, accuses Russia of a number of "mischaracterizations". The US also asserts that the document sent by Russia did not contain actual questions, but rather a series of "assertions" whose overall purpose is "to imply an unspecified sinister motive". The US also replied to specific accusations by Russia as follows: [30]

  • Laboratories in Ukraine were established on a legal basis, per the BWC, which encourages cooperative research between signatory states in the area of new potential threats, such as zoonotic diseases. The US pointed out that it has been running cooperative research together with Russia itself since 1992 for 21 years in exactly the same way as with Ukraine and other countries. This US-Russian cooperative research program was terminated by Russia in 2005.
  • Russia alluded to Ukraine improperly "send[ing] all strains and data from disease surveillance" to the United States. The US asserted this was a mischaracterization, since transfer of samples is a typical part of any scientific cooperation in any area. The exchange of samples was voluntary and applied to samples explicitly requested by the US side for research purposes, rather than a blanket order to transfer of all results as suggested by Russia.
  • The United States also asserts that the documents published by Russia were "virtually unreadable". US requests to provide readable copies was ignored, and later used by Russia to claim that the "US did not provide responses" to their legitimate documents.
  • Russia accused Ukraine and the US of forming the cooperative agreement in "secret", while Russia itself has relied on information openly published by Ukraine and US research websites. The joint research program has also resulted in dozens of scientific articles that remain openly available in scientific journals, and further summarized in official BWC reports.
  • Russia claimed the list of specific pathogens studied at Mechnikov Anti-Plague Scientific Institute in Odesa, Ukraine "disagrees with the current Ukraine’s health issues". The US has replied that this claim reveals ignorance regarding the scope of Ukraine's current health issues (e.g. cases of anthrax and cholera are endemic to Ukraine and another huge outbreak of the latter "could occur as a result of the war waged by the Russian Federation"). [30]

Online conspiracy theorists

In March 2022, CNN, France 24, and Foreign Policy reported that QAnon promoters were echoing Russian disinformation that created conspiracy theories about US-funded laboratories in Ukraine. [31] [12] [13] Russian state media falsely claimed that "secret US biolabs" were creating weapons, a claim refuted by the US, Ukraine, and the United Nations. [12] [19] In reality, the Ukrainian Ministry of Health and the U.S. Department of Defense signed an agreement in 2005 to prevent the spread of technologies and pathogens that might be used in the development of biological weapons. [32] New laboratories were established to secure and dismantle the remnants of the Soviet biological weapons program, and since then have been used to monitor and prevent new epidemics. The laboratories are publicly listed, not secret, and are owned and operated by host countries such as Ukraine, not by the US. [31] [32] The Ukrainian-owned threat reduction labs, which are listed by the U.S. Embassy, also send academics to international scientific conferences who publicize their work. [33] In the conspiracy theory interpretation, QAnon followers have claimed to justify the invasion of Ukraine as an effort by Putin and Trump to destroy "military" laboratories in Ukraine. [31] [12] InfoWars has also supported the conspiracy theory, running a headline: "Russian Strikes Targeting US-Run Bio-Labs in Ukraine?". [24]

Zignal Labs assessed that English language influencers had initially elaborated the talking point, which was spread by Russian propaganda thereafter, with Russian-language posts on "biolabs" increasing after March 6 to outpace English-language posts on the subject. [16] According to cybersecurity and threat intelligence company Pyrra Technologies, the first mention of biolabs in Ukraine was a February 14 post on alt-tech far-right social network Gab, ten days before the start of the invasion. [16]

The Center for Monitoring, Analysis and Strategy (CeMAS) found that a German Telegram channel with over 200,000 subscribers was promoting false claims about the US having a secret biological laboratory in Ukraine. [34] [35] CeMAS cofounder Jan Rathje said: "All of these new [online] actors that became influential during the pandemic switched to a pro-Russia position. They always focus on a large conspiracy going on from the elite against the people. People are suffering in Ukraine. And they wouldn't deny that. But they would say, 'Yeah, but that's part of the larger, inhumane conspiracy that's going on.'" [34]

Spread of conspiracy theory and reactions

According to journalist Justin Ling, the Ukraine bioweapons myth spread "from a fringe QAnon channel directly to Fox News and Donald Trump Jr." Fox News commentator Tucker Carlson claimed that the U.S. was "funding the creation of deadly pathogens" and broadcast statements by Russian and Chinese government spokesmen accusing Washington of operating a bioweapons program in Europe. Tucker Carlson continued the story on several episodes, including an episode with Glenn Greenwald on March 10, 2022. [24]

That month, as reported by Mother Jones , [36] the Kremlin sent a memo to state-friendly media outlets saying it was "essential" to use video clips of Carlson "as much as possible". Mother Jones further observed Carlson was the only Western media pundit the Kremlin adopted in this way. [37] [38]

Newsweek reported former U.S. representative from Hawaii, Tulsi Gabbard had been labelled as a "Russian asset" by critics for espousing the idea that "U.S.-funded bio labs" in Ukraine are conducting research into "deadly pathogens". Although Gabbard "did not repeat the claims of Ukraine developing bio weapons with U.S. military backing ... a number of people criticized Gabbard's tweet for appearing to echo falsehoods being peddled by Russia," with critics including Illinois Republican representative Adam Kinzinger [39] and Mitt Romney. [40] Tulsi Gabbard also appeared on Fox News to discuss the claims with Tucker Carlson, and clips of this were played on Russian state television. [39] Gabbard later clarified the comments to say that she does not believe there are bioweapons in Ukraine, but said that labs allegedly researching pathogens in an active warzone may be damaged by Russia. [40]

A Brookings Institution dataset tracked how a group of right-wing political podcasts were promoting the "Ukraine bioweapons labs" myth between March 8 and 18, with the most prolific being Steve Bannon and Charlie Kirk, who supported the narrative in five episodes each. Previous COVID-19 conspiracy theories were frequently rehashed, with Anthony Fauci mentioned over 50 times, among various unsubstantiated accusations. [41] According to Brookings, the podcasting medium served to propagate disinformation potentially faster than 'social' media, because there is no "built-in mechanism" for listeners to push back on claims or fact-check. [41]

A study by the Center for Countering Digital Hate found that Facebook failed to label 80% of posts sharing external articles that spread the conspiracy theory as false or misleading. The posts used in the study were dated from 24 February to 14 March. A Facebook spokesperson said that the study "misrepresents the scale and scope of our efforts". [42]

Connection to previous conspiracy theories

Political scientist and espionage scholar Thomas Rid suggests this may be a case of the Kremlin "accusing the other side of the thing they are in fact doing" based on historical precedent (accusation in a mirror). [16] In the 1980s, when the Soviets deployed chemical weapons in Laos and Afghanistan, Soviet-aligned press published disinformation alleging that the CIA was weaponizing mosquitoes. [16] [43] False Soviet reports blaming HIV/AIDS on the United States, commonly called Operation INFEKTION, [44] also aimed to distract from contemporary Soviet activities. [16] [45] [46] Additionally, Thomas Rid stated that the right-wing adoption of the Ukraine bioweapons conspiracy theory may be influenced by the COVID-19 lab leak theory. [16]

The Kremlin has a history of fomenting conspiracy theories about ordinary biology labs in former Soviet republics, having previously spread propaganda about Georgia and Kazakhstan similar to recent accusations deployed against Ukraine. [47] [48] [49] [50] For example, the Kremlin made false accusations against the public health facility, Lugar Research Center in Georgia, as the research center worked on fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. [48] [49] The labs have been widely observed by international partnerships since the Nunn–Lugar Cooperative Threat Reduction, which was established to contain and eliminate weapons of mass destruction (nuclear, chemical, and biological) left behind in the former Soviet Union. When this threat reduction was complete, the research facilities, owned by the newly independent countries, began the task of public health research, including monitoring and preventing new epidemics. [49] The Department of Defense provides "technical support to the Ukrainian Ministry of Health since 2005 to improve public health laboratories" as part of a continuation of international agreements to reduce biological threats, but does not control or provide personnel to the public health facilities. [51] [52] [53]

Robert Mackey, a writer for The Intercept , noted similarities the conspiracy theory shared with the false and fabricated claims the United States made about Iraq's WMD programme in the lead-up to the Iraq War. He stated that, while Russian officials regularly cited this as a reason to dismiss criticism against their conduct in Ukraine, they nevertheless echoed the dishonesty of the Bush Administration whenever they presented false claims about Ukrainian bioweapons as fact, saying:

All this suggests that the real lesson Russian officials took from the false American claims of WMD [sic] in Iraq is not that such claims need to be backed by solid evidence, but that they can make similarly false claims now, secure in the knowledge that very few people will bother to look at the evidence at all. [54]

See also

Related Research Articles

The SARS conspiracy theory began to emerge during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak in China in the spring of 2003, when Sergei Kolesnikov, a Russian scientist and a member of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, first publicized his claim that the SARS coronavirus is a synthesis of measles and mumps. According to Kolesnikov, this combination cannot be formed in the natural world and thus the SARS virus must have been produced under laboratory conditions. Another Russian scientist, Nikolai Filatov, head of Moscow's epidemiological services, had earlier commented that the SARS virus was probably man-made.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Michel Chossudovsky</span> Canadian economist and author

Michel Chossudovsky is a Canadian economist and author. He is professor emeritus of economics at the University of Ottawa and the president and director of the Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG), which runs the website globalresearch.ca, founded in 2001, which publishes falsehoods and conspiracy theories. Chossudovsky has promoted conspiracy theories about 9/11.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">QAnon</span> American conspiracy theory and political movement

QAnon is a far-right American political conspiracy theory and political movement which originated in 2017. QAnon centers on fabricated claims made by an anonymous individual or individuals known as "Q". Those claims have been relayed and developed by online communities and influencers. Their core belief is that a cabal of Satanic, cannibalistic child molesters are operating a global child sex trafficking ring which conspired against Donald Trump. QAnon has direct roots in Pizzagate, an Internet conspiracy theory that appeared one year earlier, but also incorporates elements of many other theories. QAnon has been described as a cult.

The United States biological weapons program officially began in spring 1943 on orders from U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Research continued following World War II as the U.S. built up a large stockpile of biological agents and weapons. Over the course of its 27-year history, the program weaponized and stockpiled seven bio-agents — Bacillus anthracis (anthrax), Francisella tularensis (tularemia), Brucella spp (brucellosis), Coxiella burnetii (Q-fever), Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, Botulinum toxin (botulism), and Staphylococcal enterotoxin B. The US also pursued basic research on many more bio-agents. Throughout its history, the U.S. bioweapons program was secret. It was later revealed that laboratory and field testing had been common. The official policy of the United States was first to deter the use of bio-weapons against U.S. forces and secondarily to retaliate if deterrence failed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Soviet biological weapons program</span> Russian bioweapons program from 1920s to 1990s

The Soviet Union covertly operated the world's largest, longest, and most sophisticated biological weapons program, thereby violating its obligations as a party to the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. The program began in the 1920s and lasted until at least September 1992 but has possibly been continued by Russia after that.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ukraine and weapons of mass destruction</span>

Ukraine, a republic of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) from 1922–1991, once hosted Soviet nuclear weapons and delivery systems on its territory. Together with Russia, Ukraine was a part of the former Soviet Union but its population voted overwhelmingly for independence in 1991, which ended any realistic chance of the Soviet Union staying together even on a limited scale.

MintPress News (MPN) is an American far-left news website founded and edited by Mnar Adley which was launched in January 2012 and also publishes the MintCast podcast. It covers political, economic, foreign affairs and environmental issues. Editorially, MintPress News supports Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, and the governments of Russia, Iran, and Syria. It opposes the governments of Israel and Saudi Arabia, and reports geopolitical events from an anti-Western perspective. In one contentious article, MintPress News falsely asserted that the Ghouta chemical attack in Syria was perpetrated by rebel groups rather than by the Syrian government.

New Eastern Outlook (NEO) is an internet journal published by the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences. According to its website, this journal looks at world events "as they relate to the Orient." According to a 2020 report from the US State Department, NEO is "a pseudo-academic publication ... that promotes disinformation and propaganda focused primarily on the Middle East, Asia, and Africa." According to the United States Department of the Treasury, NEO is run by SVR, Russia's foreign intelligence agency. NEO is included in the EUvsDisinfo project, which tracks online disinformation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Eva Bartlett</span> Canadian activist and blogger

Eva Karene Bartlett is a Russian-based American Canadian activist, journalist, commentator, and blogger who has propagated conspiracy theories in connection to the Syrian civil war, most notably the disproven allegation that the White Helmets stage rescues and "recycle" children in its videos.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lugar Research Center</span> Research center in Tbilisi, Georgia

Richard Lugar Center for Public Health Research is a research center (laboratory) based on the National Center for Disease Control and Public Health, which was commissioned in 2011 and fully opened in August 2013. The LRC is the highest level of laboratory network in the country, representing the public health system referral library. The LRC is one of the best field of scientific biomedical and biosafety researches and preparation of students. The Center is accredited for graduate-level education, and has a BSL-3 facility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">COVID-19 misinformation</span> False or misleading virus information

False information, including intentional disinformation and conspiracy theories, about the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic and the origin, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the disease has been spread through social media, text messaging, and mass media. False information has been propagated by celebrities, politicians, and other prominent public figures. Many countries have passed laws against "fake news", and thousands of people have been arrested for spreading COVID-19 misinformation. The spread of COVID-19 misinformation by governments has also been significant.

Information laundering is the surfacing of news, false or otherwise, from unverified sources into the mainstream. In advancing disinformation in such a way that makes it accepted as ostensibly legitimate information, information laundering resembles money laundering—the transforming of illicit funds into ostensibly legitimate funds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aaron Maté</span> Canadian journalist

Aaron Maté is a Canadian writer and journalist. He hosts the show Pushback with Aaron Maté on The Grayzone and, as of January 2022, he fills in as a host on the Useful Idiots podcast. Maté has worked as a reporter and producer for Democracy Now!, Vice, The Real News Network, and Al Jazeera, and has contributed to The Nation.

Accusation in a mirror (AiM) is a technique often used in the context of hate speech incitement, where one falsely attributes one's own motives and/or intentions to one's adversaries. It has been cited, along with dehumanization, as one of the indirect or cloaked forms of incitement to genocide, which has contributed to the commission of genocide, for example in the Holocaust or the Rwandan genocide. By invoking collective self-defense, accusation in a mirror is used to justify genocide, similar to self-defense as a defense for individual homicide.

Logically is a British multinational technology startup company that specializes in analyzing and fighting disinformation. Logically was founded in 2017 by Lyric Jain and is based in Brighouse, England, with offices in London, Mysore, Bangalore, and Virginia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Disinformation in the Russian invasion of Ukraine</span>

As part of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the Russian state and state-controlled media have spread disinformation in their information war against Ukraine. Ukrainian media and politicians have also been accused of using propaganda and deception, although such efforts have been compared to the Russian disinformation campaign as more limited.

Russian disinformation campaigns have occurred in many countries. For example, disinformation campaigns led by Yevgeny Prigozhin have been reported in several African countries. Russia, however, denies that it uses disinformation to influence public opinion.

<i>SouthFront</i> Russian military disinformation website

SouthFront is a multilingual website registered in Russia and based in Crimea. It has been accused by multiple sources of being an outlet for disinformation and propaganda under the control of the Russian government. For this reason, it has been sanctioned by the US Treasury and banned by social media platforms.

This timeline includes entries on the spread of COVID-19 misinformation and conspiracy theories related to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada. This includes investigations into the origin of COVID-19, and the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 which is caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2. Social media apps and platforms, including Facebook, TikTok, Telegram, and YouTube, have contributed to the spread of misinformation. The Canadian Anti-Hate Network (CAHN) reported that conspiracy theories related to COVID-19 began on "day one". CAHN reported on March 16, 2020, that far-right groups in Canada were taking advantage of the climate of anxiety and fear surrounding COVID, to recycle variations of conspiracies from the 1990s, that people had shared over shortwave radio. COVID-19 disinformation is intentional and seeks to create uncertainty and confusion. But most of the misinformation is shared online unintentionally by enthusiastic participants who are politically active.

Julia Davis is a Ukrainian-born American journalist and media analyst writing for The Daily Beast. She is best known for founding Russian Media Monitor, a project monitoring Russian state television, including its international outlets such as RT. She has been described as the "foremost U.S. expert on Russian government-controlled television and propaganda". She has also been described as a "Russian TV whisperer for American ears". Regarding her founding of the Russian Media Monitor, she has stated that "it felt like a very natural thing that, when the U.S. is under such an attack from that part of the world, that with the unique experiences and skills I have, and the language, that I jump in and try to do something about it." She stated that:

Until 2014, my primary focus was on filmmaking, investigative reporting about crimes, government, corruption and civil rights. However, when Putin invaded Ukraine, I was dismayed to discover the lack of reporting on that topic in the U.S., which meant that a lot of news coverage was coming through the Russian English-speaking channel, RT, right here in the United States. RT previously claimed to be an alternative media outlet that reported about fringe politics, global issues and government corruption, but everything changed after Russia annexed the Crimea. In one of her interviews, [RT's editor-in-chief Margarita] Simonyan admitted that RT was created as an instrument to be used by the Kremlin for its info-wars against the West.... She explained that it would be too late to start making weapons once the war has already started. Thus, RT was apparently crafted in advance and was masquerading as a legitimate media outlet, to be used as needed.... This became very apparent in 2014. In short order, the Kremlin's bullhorn was weaponized, spewing out blatant propaganda and outright fakes.

References

  1. ↑ "Ukraine war: Fact-checking Russia's biological weapons claims". BBC News. March 15, 2022.
  2. ↑ Wong, Edward (March 11, 2022). "U.S. Fights Bioweapons Disinformation Pushed by Russia and China". The New York Times . ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved March 13, 2022.
  3. 1 2 "In Ukraine, US-military-linked labs could provide fodder for Russian disinformation". Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. March 9, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  4. 1 2 3 Landay, Jonathan; Pamuk, Humeyra; Lewis, Simon (March 11, 2022). "U.N. says no evidence to back Russian claim of Ukraine biological weapons program". Reuters. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  5. ↑ [1] [2] [3] [4]
  6. ↑ "China Pushes Conspiracy Theory About U.S. Labs in Ukraine". Bloomberg . March 8, 2022.
  7. 1 2 Rising, David (March 11, 2022). "China amplifies unsupported Russian claim of Ukraine biolabs". Associated Press. Retrieved March 11, 2022.
  8. ↑ McCarthy, Simone (March 10, 2022). "China's promotion of Russian disinformation indicates where its loyalties lie". CNN . Retrieved March 11, 2022.
  9. ↑ "Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Zhao Lijian's Regular Press Conference on March 8, 2022". www.fmprc.gov.cn. Retrieved March 12, 2022.
  10. ↑ [6] [7] [8] [9]
  11. ↑ O'Sullivan, Donie. "Analysis: Russia and QAnon have the same false conspiracy theory about Ukraine". CNN. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 "China and QAnon embrace Russian disinformation justifying war in Ukraine". France 24. March 12, 2022. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  13. 1 2 Ling, Justin. "False Claims of U.S. Biowarfare Labs in Ukraine Grip QAnon". Foreign Policy. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  14. ↑ "Russia's bioweapon conspiracy theory finds support in US". www.aljazeera.com.
  15. ↑ "What are Ukraine 'biolabs' and why have they become an obsession for Fox News?". Independent.co.uk . March 18, 2022.
  16. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Collins, Ben; Collier, Kevin (March 14, 2022). "Russian propaganda on Ukraine's non-existent 'biolabs' boosted by U.S. far right". NBC News. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  17. ↑ [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]
  18. ↑ Mackey, Robert (March 17, 2022). "Russia Is Lying About Evidence of Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine, Russian Biologists Say". The Intercept. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  19. 1 2 "United Nations Not Aware of Any Biological Weapons Programmes, Disarmament Chief Affirms as Security Council Meets to Address Related Concerns in Ukraine | Meetings Coverage and Press Releases". www.un.org. Retrieved March 18, 2022.
  20. ↑ Dotson, John (June 17, 2022). "Beijing's Propaganda Support for Russian Biological Warfare Disinformation, Part 1: Accusations Concerning the War in Ukraine". Jamestown Foundation . Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  21. ↑ Ling, Justin. "How U.S. Bioweapons in Ukraine Became Russia's New Big Lie". Foreign Policy. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  22. ↑ Gadzo, Mersiha. "Time for Bosnia to 'get rid of Russian influence': Analysts". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  23. ↑ Ling, Justin (March 17, 2022). "American Ex-Cop Goes to Ukraine on Twisted Mission to Vindicate Putin". The Daily Beast. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  24. 1 2 3 Ling, Justin (March 18, 2022). "How 'Ukrainian bioweapons labs' myth went from QAnon fringe to Fox News". The Guardian. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  25. ↑ Rigby, Jennifer; Landay, Jonathan (March 11, 2022). "EXCLUSIVE WHO says it advised Ukraine to destroy pathogens in health labs to prevent disease spread". Reuters. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  26. ↑ "Микробиолог объясняет, почему заявления о "биологическом оружии" в Украине – ложь: "Расчет, что люди не знают названий патогенов"". Настоящее Время (in Russian). March 10, 2022. Retrieved February 26, 2024.
  27. ↑ "Выпускники биофака МГУ назвали ложными заявления российских СМИ о разработке биооружия в Украине". The Insider (in Russian). Retrieved February 26, 2024.
  28. ↑ Quinn, Allison (July 19, 2022). "Russia Says It's Losing Because Ukraine Has Experimental Mutant Troops Created in Secret Biolabs". The Daily Beast. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
  29. ↑ "Посмотрели в глаза чудовищ". Kommersant (in Russian). July 18, 2022. Retrieved July 19, 2022.
  30. 1 2 "Response by the United States of America to the request by the Russian Federation for a Consultative Meeting under Article V of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC)" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on September 7, 2022. Retrieved September 7, 2022.
  31. 1 2 3 O'Sullivan, Donie (March 10, 2022). "Analysis: Russia and QAnon have the same false conspiracy theory about Ukraine". CNN. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  32. 1 2 "Ukraine, US Biolabs, and an Ongoing Russian Disinformation Campaign". Snopes.com. February 24, 2022. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  33. ↑ "Biological Threat Reduction Program". U.S. Embassy in Ukraine. Retrieved March 26, 2022.
  34. 1 2 Kayali, Laura; Scott, Mark (March 17, 2022). "Anti-vax conspiracy groups lean into pro-Kremlin propaganda in Ukraine". Politico . Retrieved November 11, 2022.
  35. ↑ Rathje, Jan (March 11, 2022). "Verschwörungsideologische Positionierungen zum russischen Angriffskrieg gegen die Ukraine" [Conspiracy ideological positions on the Russian war of aggression against Ukraine]. CeMAS (in German). Retrieved November 24, 2022.
  36. ↑ Pengelly, Martin (March 14, 2022). "Kremlin memos urged Russian media to use Tucker Carlson clips – report". The Guardian. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  37. ↑ Corn, David (March 13, 2022). "Leaked Kremlin Memo to Russian Media: It Is 'Essential' to Feature Tucker Carlson". Mother Jones. Retrieved March 13, 2022.
  38. ↑ Pengelly, Martin (March 14, 2022). "Kremlin memos urged Russian media to use Tucker Carlson clips – report". The Guardian. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  39. 1 2 "Tulsi Gabbard labeled a "Russian asset" for pushing U.S. biolabs in Ukraine claim". Newsweek. March 14, 2022. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  40. 1 2 Palmer, Ewan (March 15, 2022). "Tulsi Gabbard clarifies Ukraine bio labs remarks after widespread outrage". Newsweek. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  41. 1 2 Danaditya, Jessica Brandt, Valerie Wirtschafter, and Adya (March 23, 2022). "Popular podcasters spread Russian disinformation about Ukraine biolabs". Brookings. Retrieved March 24, 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  42. ↑ Paul, Kari (March 31, 2022). "Facebook fails to label 80% of posts promoting bioweapons conspiracy theory". The Guardian. Retrieved April 3, 2022.
  43. ↑ The U.S.S.R.'s AIDS Disinformation Campaign. Ann Arbor, Michigan: U.S. Department of State. 1987. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  44. ↑ "Lessons From Operation "Denver," the KGB's Massive AIDS Disinformation Campaign". The MIT Press Reader. May 26, 2020. Retrieved April 15, 2021.
  45. ↑ Producer, Molly Thomas, Investigative Correspondent and Riley Nimens (March 11, 2022). "Online propaganda war rages in parallel to battles on Ukraine streets". W5. Retrieved March 21, 2022.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  46. ↑ "Russia claims U.S. labs across Ukraine are secretly developing biological weapons". NPR.org. Retrieved March 24, 2022.
  47. ↑ Fichera, Angelo; Klepper, David (March 12, 2022). "Russia's bioweapon conspiracy theory finds support in US". San Francisco Chronicle. Archived from the original on March 27, 2022. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  48. 1 2 Rawnsley, Adam (March 18, 2022). "What You Don't Know About Russia's 'Bioweapons' Bullshit". The Daily Beast. Retrieved March 18, 2022.
  49. 1 2 3 Stronski, Paul. "Ex-Soviet Bioweapons Labs Are Fighting COVID-19. Moscow Doesn't Like It". Foreign Policy. Retrieved March 18, 2022.
  50. ↑ "A US-funded lab in Tbilisi, Georgia fights COVID-19 — and Russian disinformation". Coda Story. March 18, 2020.
  51. ↑ Kessler, Glenn (March 11, 2022). "How the right embraced Russian disinformation about 'U.S. bioweapons labs' in Ukraine". Washington Post. Retrieved March 27, 2022.
  52. ↑ Palmer, Ewan (March 8, 2022). "U.S. biological weapons in Ukraine—separating the facts from the fiction". Newsweek. Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  53. ↑ "PolitiFact - There are no US-run biolabs in Ukraine, contrary to social media posts". PolitiFact . Retrieved March 21, 2022.
  54. ↑ Mackey, Robert (March 17, 2022). "Russia Is Lying About Evidence of Bioweapons Labs in Ukraine, Russian Biologists Say". The Intercept . Archived from the original on June 22, 2022. Retrieved October 12, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.