Wisconsin circuit courts

Last updated
Wisconsin Circuit Court System
EstablishedAugust 1848
JurisdictionFlag of Wisconsin.svg  Wisconsin
Location
Composition method Nonpartisan election from within judicial circuit
Authorized by
Appeals to Wisconsin Court of Appeals
Judge term lengthSix years, no term limit
Number of positions261
Annual budget$209,042,400
Website Official site
Division map
2020 WI JudicialDistricts.svg

The Wisconsin circuit courts are the general trial courts in the state of Wisconsin. There are currently 69 circuits in the state, divided into 10 judicial administrative districts. Circuit court judges hear and decide both civil and criminal cases. Each of the 249 circuit court judges are elected and serve six-year terms. [1]

Contents

On March 6, 2020, Governor Tony Evers signed bipartisan legislation to create 12 new circuit court branches, with four seats to be added each year from 2021 to 2023. [2]

Structure of the circuit courts

The circuit court system is composed of 69 circuits, with 66 circuits serving a single county, and three circuits serving two counties each. [3] Buffalo and Pepin counties share a circuit, as do Florence and Forest counties, and Shawano and Menominee counties. [3] 26 circuit courts are served by a single judge. [3] For those circuits with more than one judge, each is elected to a particular seat, or "branch" within the court. The Milwaukee County Circuit Court has the greatest number of branches with 47.

The circuit courts are organized into 9 geographical administrative districts. [3] Within each district the Wisconsin Supreme Court will appoint a chief judge, a deputy chief judge, and a professional district court administrator. [3] With the exception of Milwaukee County, chief judges and their deputies continue to hear cases while serving. Chief judges assign judges to hear only a specific type of case (e.g. civil, criminal, juvenile), equalize the flow of cases, establish court policies and rules, and supervise the finances of the courts they administer. They also work closely with county boards on security, facility, and staffing issues. The chief judges and district court administration meet regularly with the director of state courts to discuss current issues and to advise the Supreme court and the director on matters of statewide concern.

In 2017, Wisconsin's Supreme Court created a new Business Court, the Commercial Docket Pilot Project, [4] located in the Waukesha County Circuit Court and the Eighth Judicial Administrative District. [5] On April 1, 2019, the Supreme Court expanded the Commercial Docket's geographic jurisdiction to encompass the entire state. [6] In 2020, the Supreme Court issued an Order adding the Dane County Circuit Court as a location for a pilot project business court. [7] The Supreme Court issued an Order on June 29, 2022, extending the pilot project to July 30, 2024. [8]

Jurisdiction

The Wisconsin circuit courts have original jurisdiction to hear all civil and criminal matters within the state. The court's jurisdiction is conferred by Article VII, Section 8 of the Wisconsin Constitution and is quite broad. Since the court's subject matter jurisdiction is constitutional rather than statutory, the Wisconsin Legislature cannot limit it by statute. By comparison, the United States Congress is empowered to limit the subject matter jurisdiction of federal District Courts if it so chooses.

The geographic limitations of the circuit court's authority are referred to as "personal jurisdiction." In a civil case, the requirements for personal jurisdiction are governed by chapter 801.05 of the Wisconsin Statutes. Generally speaking, a defendant must either be present in the state, or have sufficient contacts with the state, and the pleadings must have been properly served on the defendant. Personal jurisdiction requirements in a civil case are driven by policy considerations, such as fairness to the defendant, comity, and principals of federalism.

The circuit court has personal jurisdiction over a defendant in a criminal case if the defendant violates a Wisconsin law while physically present in Wisconsin. Wisconsin courts also have personal jurisdiction over a defendant who commits an act while out of state that contributes to a crime, the consequences of which occur in Wisconsin. [9]

Limits on exercise of power to decide cases

There are, however, limits on what cases the circuit courts will hear. They will not hear a case if the parties lack standing, or if the case is moot or is not ripe. Additionally, the circuit court will not hear a case in which it lacks competency. State law distinguishes between the court's jurisdiction (power to hear a case) and its competency (ability to arrive at a valid judgment in a case). A court lacks competency if certain statutory requirements are not satisfied, for example, time limits for filing suit, or requirements as to which circuit should decide a case.

In addition, the courts are constrained from taking action that will encroach on the powers of the legislative or executive branches. Under the separation of powers doctrine, no branch of government may exercise a power of government assigned exclusively to another branch. The purpose of separating powers among the branches of government is to avoid concentration of governmental power in the hands of a few and to give the various branches the ability to check actions by the other branches.

In reviewing the validity of state laws, the courts are limited to determining whether the law violates any provision of the constitution. The courts may invalidate a law that violates individual rights, such as the right to equal protection or due process, or a law that is not enacted according to the process established in the constitution, for example, a bill that was not passed by a majority of the members of each house of the Wisconsin State Legislature. However, a court may not invalidate a law because the court finds that the legislature's method for addressing a problem was not the most efficient. Nor may the court substitute its determination of what is in the public interest for the determination of the legislature.

While the separation of powers doctrine limits the ability of the courts to act, it also protects the courts from encroachment by the legislature of governor. The Wisconsin Supreme Court established its judicial power in the three-branch system soon after Wisconsin became a state by deciding Bashford v. Barstow (1856), an election case that resulted in the ouster of an incumbent governor. [10]

Commencing a civil case

Civil cases start the same way regardless of the issues or parties involved and regardless of whether the case ultimately goes to trial. A case begins with pleadings, in which the parties state basic claims and responses. The parties then have an opportunity to investigate the claims and gather evidence through a process called discovery. The court generally has little direct involvement in a case until shortly before trial, though the court is available to resolve preliminary matters and disputes.

Pleadings

The plaintiff starts a civil case by filing a summons, and generally a complaint, with the clerk of circuit court and paying a filing fee. A summons provides notice that a suit has been filed against the defendant and notification that the defendant must answer the complaint. The complaint sets forth the plaintiff's allegations against the defendant. It must contain a short and plain statement of the plaintiff's claim, identify the events out of which the claim arises, and demand relief to satisfy the plaintiff's claim. The plaintiff must serve an authenticated copy of the summons and complaint on the defendant. The favored method for serving the defendant is to personally hand a copy of the summons. Alternatively, the server may hand the summons to another responsible adult at the defendant's residence or, in some cases, it is sufficient for the plaintiff to publish the summons in a newspaper and send it to the defendant's address. Any adult who is not a party to the lawsuit may serve the summons. The person who serves the summons must sign the summons at the time of service and note the date, time, place, and manner of service and upon whom the summons is served. The plaintiff then files proof of service with the court.

A plaintiff must commence a suit by serving the defendant with a summons within a certain time period established by a statute of limitation, or lose the right to sue. Statutes of limitation differ according to the type of suit. For example, a suit for breach of a sales contract must be commenced within six years; a suit for medical malpractice must be commenced within three years of the injury or within one year of discovery of the injury; and a suit to collect child support must be commenced within 20 years after the youngest child for whom support is due turns 18.

The defendant responds to the plaintiff's allegations in a document called an answer. The defendant admits or denies an allegation or state they do not know if the allegation is true, in which case the allegation is taken as denied. The defendant may also raise affirmative defenses (defenses that defeat the plaintiff's claims even if the plaintiff's allegations are true), for example, that the time period for filing the suit has expired, that the service of the summons and complaint was invalid, or that the complaint has already been settled in previous litigation. The defendant may also file a counterclaim against the plaintiff, or a cross-claim against a fellow defendant.

The complaint and the answer together constitute the "pleadings" in a case. The purpose of the pleadings is to provide notice of the claims and defenses. The issues of the case generally are not narrowed until later in the proceedings.

Discovery

After an action is commenced, the parties begin discovery, which is intended to provide the parties mutual knowledge of facts relevant to a case before trial so that the trial is limited to resolving disputed facts and issues. Discovery also allows the parties to formulate and narrow the issues for trial and obtain and preserve evidence. A recipient of a discovery request generally must provide the information or material requested unless it is readily available from another source or is privileged. The scope of permitted discovery in a civil case is quite broad. A party may use discovery to obtain material that will be inadmissible as evidence at trial as long as the material is reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence. Methods of discovery include depositions (recorded interviews with witnesses under oath), interrogatories (written questions), requests for production of documents or things, medical examinations, and requests for admissions.

Ideally and usually, discovery takes place without direct involvement by the court. Except for medical examinations and inspection of medical records, discovery requests need not be authorized by the court. The recipient of a discovery request may seek a protective order denying certain discovery or limiting its scope if the discovery requested will cause annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, or undue burden or expense, or will inquire into privileged or irrelevant matters, and the party requesting discovery may request that the court intervene and order compliance.

Pretrial activities in court

After the pleadings are filed, the court may hold a scheduling conference with the parties and issue a scheduling order to manage the progress of the case. The scheduling order generally assigns dates for filing motions, amending pleadings, completing discovery, pretrial conferences between the judge and parties, and for trial. Some judges also use the scheduling conference to advise the parties to attempt to settle the case without going to trial.

In civil cases, parties often file a variety of pretrial motions with the court seeking court orders affecting the trial. For example, a defendant may seek dismissal of a whole case or certain issues in the case because the plaintiff has not stated a valid claim. Or, a party may seek an order compelling the opposing party to comply with a discovery request or a ruling on admissibility of certain pieces of evidence at trial. If the court requires additional information before ruling on a motion, the court may hold a hearing and may direct the parties to submit briefs, written materials that state the facts and present each side's position.

The courts resolve motions by order, often directing the prevailing party to prepare the order and submit it to the judge for his or her signature. The resolution of pretrial motions often dictates the future of a case. If a party wins a pretrial motion for summary judgment, the case is dismissed. Sometimes a party who loses important pretrial motions is more likely to agree to a settlement. A settlement must be accepted by a judge. Judges usually accept settlement agreements in civil cases with minimal review, although they look more closely at settlement agreements in divorce cases. If the parties do not settle, the case proceeds to trial.

Commencing a criminal case

Only the state may bring a criminal case. Generally a prosecutor starts a criminal case by filing a complaint. The court is directly involved in a criminal case from the beginning to protect the rights of the defendant. Parties have a right to discovery in a criminal case, but discovery is not as extensive in a criminal case as in a civil case because the state must have completed most of its investigation before bringing criminal charges.

The criminal complaint

Most criminal cases are started when a prosecutor, either a district attorney (who represents a county) or the attorney general (who represents the state), files a complaint with the court. The complaint states the crime charged, names the defendant, and gives the date, approximate time, and location of the crime. In a complaint, the district attorney also presents sufficient facts to show why the defendant is being charged, identifies the source of the information contained in the complaint, and provides reasons why the source should be believed.

Prosecution of most crimes must be commenced within a certain time period that is established by a statute of limitation. The state generally has six years to commence prosecution of a felony (a crime for which a person may be sentenced to one year or more in prison) and three years for a misdemeanor (a crime for which the maximum penalty is a year in jail). However, there is no time limit for the prosecution of homicide. The main purpose of time limits is to ensure that criminal cases are tried while the evidence is still available and witnesses' memories are fresh. A case is commenced when a warrant, summons, or indictment is issued or an information is filed.

Pretrial court appearances

The defendant's first court date is called the initial appearance. The court informs the defendant of the charges filed against him or her and gives the defendant a copy of the complaint. The court also informs the defendant of his or her right to have an attorney and that if the defendant is indigent and requests counsel, the court will appoint an attorney. If the defendant is in custody, the court determines whether to release the defendant on bail, and if the defendant is released, imposes conditions for bail. In a misdemeanor case, the court may set the trial date at the initial appearance. The next court action in a misdemeanor case is the arraignment. Further steps are required in a felony case. At the initial appearance, the court informs felony defendants that they are entitled to a preliminary examination before the criminal case may go forward.

The purpose of a preliminary examination is to determine in a felony case whether the district attorney can show probable cause to believe that the defendant committed a felony. If not, the court must dismiss the felony complaint. At the preliminary examination the district attorney and defendant may call witnesses and present evidence. If the court determines that the district attorney has shown probable cause or the defendant waives the right to a preliminary examination, the case goes forward. The prosecutor files a pleading called an "information," which informs the court of the crime with which the defendant is charged and states the date and place of the crime.

An arraignment is held in both misdemeanor and felony cases. At the arraignment, the complaint or information is read out loud unless the defendant waives reading, and in a felony case the district attorney gives the defendant a copy of the information. The court then asks the defendant to submit a plea. The defendant may plead "guilty", "no contest", "not guilty", or "not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect". A plea of no contest has the same effect in a criminal case as a guilty plea, except it cannot be used as an admission of criminal action in a civil case. The defendant may not enter a plea of no contest without approval from the court. If the defendant pleads guilty or no contest, the court sentences the defendant or places the defendant on probation. If the defendant pleads not guilty or not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, the case proceeds to trial.

Grand jury and John Doe proceedings

Although the vast majority of criminal cases in Wisconsin are begun by a district attorney filing a criminal complaint, some cases are commenced as the result of a grand jury or John Doe investigation. Grand jury and John Doe investigations are secret proceedings for which witnesses may be subpoenaed. Grand jury and John Doe proceedings are generally used when investigators need to take testimony under oath or compel a witness to testify in order to gather sufficient evidence to issue a criminal complaint.

A judge, usually upon the request of a district attorney, may assemble a grand jury to investigate suspected criminal activity. A grand jury consists of 17 people selected for jury service. The grand jury may request that the prosecutor subpoena and examine witnesses. Upon completing an investigation, a grand jury may by the vote of at least 14 members return an indictment, which is a written accusation that a person committed a crime. If the grand jury returns an indictment, the court issues a summons or warrant for the defendant.

A judge initiates a John Doe proceeding upon receiving a complaint about criminal activity from any person, including the district attorney. The judge must question the person who makes the complaint under oath and may subpoena and examine other witnesses (usually with the assistance of the district attorney). If the judge finds probable cause to believe that a person has committed a crime, a written complaint is filed and the judge issues a warrant for the arrest of the defendant named in the complaint.

Discovery

Discovery in a criminal case is generally less extensive than in a civil case. Discovery allows the parties to obtain certain information known by the opposing party. Upon request, the prosecution and defense must provide a list of witnesses it intends to call at trial, as well as statements of the witnesses, reports of expert witnesses, and any known criminal record of a witness. The parties must also disclose any physical evidence they intend to introduce at trial. A party may obtain a court order allowing scientific testing of evidence held by the opposing party. The prosecution must disclose statements made by the defendant that pertain to the crime or that the prosecution intends to introduce at trial. The prosecution is obligated to disclose exculpatory evidence (evidence that might weigh in the defendant's favor) to the defendant even if the defendant does not specifically request the information or material.

Pretrial motions and plea bargains

Parties in a criminal case often file pretrial motions. Common motions include motions to exclude physical evidence, a defendant's confession, or an eyewitness identification of the defendant. The court may require the attorneys to submit briefs on the motions, but briefing is less common on pretrial motions in criminal cases than civil cases.

Most criminal cases do not go to trial. Instead the prosecution and defense negotiate a settlement. The parties may agree upon the crimes to which a defendant will plead guilty and a sentence recommendation, or may only agree on the plea. The judge must review the agreement on the plea before accepting it to ensure that there is sufficient reason to believe that the defendant is guilty of the crime. If the parties agree on a sentence recommendation, the judge must review it to determine if it is appropriate. The judge is not bound by the sentence agreement.

Trial of a civil or criminal case

The proceedings in a trial of a civil or criminal case are similar. Both may be to a jury or judge. Both start with opening statements, proceed to presentation of evidence followed by closing statements, and culminate with a decision. Depending on the result of the trial, a civil case may end with the awarding of damages and a criminal trial may end with sentencing. During the trial, the role of the judge is similar – determining the admissibility of evidence, guiding the jury, if there is one, and refereeing the actions of the attorneys.

Current Judges

Circuit judges are elected to a six year term in the spring non-partisan election, currently Wisconsin holds a non-partisan primary election in February and a general election in April. New judicial terms start on the first day of August in the year of the election.

In the event of a vacancy, the Governor can appoint an interim judge to hold office until the next spring election.

District 1

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Milwaukee 1 Jack Dávila 20202027Appointed by Tony Evers [12]
2Milton L. Childs20192026Appointed by Tony Evers
3Katie Kegel20212027
4Michael J. Hanrahan20172029
5Kristela Cervera20212028Appointed by Tony Evers
6Ellen R. Brostrom20082027Appointed by Jim Doyle
7Thomas J. McAdams20142026
8William Sosnay20002030
9Paul R. Van Grunsven20042029Appointed by Jim Doyle
10Michelle A. Havas20172029
11David C. Swanson20132025
12David L. Borowski20032027
13Ana Berrios-Schroeder20232029
14Amber Raffeet August20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
15Jonathan D. Watts20092027
16Brittany C. Grayson20192026Appointed by Tony Evers
17Carolina Maria Stark20122030
18Ronnie V. Murray II20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
19Kori L. Ashley20202027Appointed by Tony Evers
20Joseph R. Wall20182030Appointed by Scott Walker
21Cynthia M. Davis20152029Appointed by Scott Walker
22Timothy M. Witkowiak20022027Appointed by Scott McCallum
23Jorge Fragoso 20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
24Raphael Ramos20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
25Nidhi Kashyap20222028
26 William S. Pocan 20062025Appointed by Jim Doyle
27Kevin E. Martens20012026Appointed by Scott McCallum
28Mark A. Sanders20122030
29Rebecca A. Kiefer20202026
30 Jonathan D. Richards 20202027Appointed by Tony Evers [13]
31Hannah C. Dugan20162028
32Laura Gramling Perez20142026
33Carl Ashley19992029
34Glenn H. Yamahiro20042028
35Frederick C. Rosa20042029Appointed by Jim Doyle
36Laura A. Crivello20182025Appointed by Scott Walker
37T. Christopher Dee20142027Appointed by Scott Walker
38Jeffrey A. Wagner19882030
39Jane V. Carroll20062030
40Danielle L. Shelton20192025 [14]
41 Lena Taylor 20242025Appointed by Tony Evers
42Reyna Morales20202027Appointed by Tony Evers [13]
43Marshall B. Murray19992030Appointed by Tommy Thompson
Marisabel Cabrera taking office Aug. 1, 2024
44Gwen Connolly20162028
45Jean Marie Kies20162028
46Anderson Gansner20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
47Kristy Yang20172029

District 2

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Kenosha 1Gerad Dougvillo20212027
2Jason A. Rossell20112030Appointed by Scott Walker
3Frank Gagliardi20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
Heather Iverson taking office Aug. 1, 2024
4Anthony Milisauskas20052029
5David P. Wilk20142027Appointed by Scott Walker
6Angelina Gabriele20212027
7Jodi L. Meier20162029Appointed by Scott Walker
8Chad G. Kerkman20092027
Racine 1Wynne P. Laufenberg20162030Appointed by Scott Walker
2Eugene Gasiorkiewicz20102028
3Toni L. Young 20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
Jessica Lynott taking office Aug. 1, 2024
4Mark Nielsen20162028
5Kristin M. Cafferty20212028Appointed by Tony Evers
6David W. Paulson20152027
7Jon E. Fredrickson20182025Appointed by Scott Walker
8Faye M. Flancher20022027Appointed by Scott McCallum
9Robert S. Repischak 20172030Appointed by Scott Walker
10Timothy D. Boyle20122030
Walworth 1Phillip A. Koss20122030Estee E. Scholtz taking office Aug. 1, 2024
2Daniel S. Johnson20162028
3Kristine E. Drettwan 20142027Appointed by Scott Walker
4David M. Reddy20102028

District 3

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Dodge 1Brian A. Pfitzinger20082026
2Martin J. De Vries 20162029Appointed by Scott Walker
3Joseph G. Sciascia20132025
4Kristine A. Snow20202026
Jefferson 1William V. Gruber20182025Appointed by Scott Walker
2William F. Hue19952025
3Robert F. Dehring Jr.20162030Appointed by Scott Walker
4Bennett J. Brantmeier20172029
Ozaukee 1Paul V. Malloy20022027Appointed by Scott McCallum
2Steve Cain20192025
3Sandy A. Williams20092027Appointed by Jim Doyle after election
Washington 1Ryan Hetzel20222029Appointed by Tony Evers
2James K. Muehlbauer20072026Appointed by Jim Doyle
3Michael Kenitz20222029Appointed by Tony Evers
4Sandra J. Giernoth20202027Appointed by Tony Evers
Waukesha 1Michael O. Bohren20002025Appointed by Tommy Thompson
2 Jennifer Dorow 20112030Appointed by Scott Walker
3Ralph M. Ramirez19992029
4Lloyd V. Carter20112029
5J. Arthur Melvin III20202026
6 Brad D. Schimel 20182025Appointed by Scott Walker
7 Cody Horlacher 20232029
8Michael P. Maxwell20152027
9Michael Aprahamian20142027Appointed by Scott Walker
10Paul Bugenhagen Jr.20152027
11William Domina20102029Appointed by Jim Doyle
12Laura Lau20182030Jack A. Pitzo taking office Aug. 1, 2024

District 4

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Calumet 1Jeffrey S. Froehlich20122030
2Carey John Reed20212027
Fond du Lac 1Anthony Nehls20222030Appointed by Tony Evers
2Laura Lavey 20222028
3Andrew J. Christenson20212027
4Tricia L. Walker20212028Appointed by Tony Evers
5Douglas R. Edelstein 20222028
Green Lake Mark Slate20112029
Manitowoc 1Mark R. Rohrer20132025
2Jerilyn M. Dietz20182030
3Bob Dewane20172029
4Anthony A. Lambrecht20232029
Marquette Chad A. Hendee20192025
Sheboygan 1Samantha Bastil20212027
2Natasha L. Torry20232029
3Angela Sutkiewicz20102029Appointed by Jim Doyle
4Rebecca Persick20152027
5George Limbeck20232029
Waushara 1Guy Dutcher20052029
2Scott C. Blader 20222028
Winnebago 1Teresa S. Basiliere20182030Michael D. Rust taking office Aug. 1, 2024
2Scott C. Woldt20042029Appointed by Jim Doyle
3Bryan D. Keberlein 20222028
4Mike Gibbs 20222028
5John Jorgensen20102028
6Daniel J. Bissett20112029

District 5

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Columbia 1Todd J. Hepler20152027
2W. Andrew Voigt 20112029
3Troy D. Cross20182030Roger L. Klopp taking office Aug. 1, 2024
Dane 1Susan M. Crawford20182030
2Josann M. Reynolds20142027Appointed by Scott Walker
3Diane Schlipper 20222028
4Everett Mitchell20162028
5Nicholas J. McNamara20092028Appointed by Jim Doyle
6Nia Trammell20202027Appointed by Tony Evers
7Mario D. White20202027Appointed by Tony Evers
8Frank D. Remington 20122030
9Jacob B. Frost20202027Appointed by Tony Evers
10Ryan D. Nilsestuen20222030Appointed by Tony Evers
11Ellen K. Berz20122030
12Ann Peacock20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
13Julie Genovese20092027
14John D. Hyland20162028
15Stephen Ehlke20092028Appointed by Jim Doyle
16Rhonda L. Lanford20132025
17David D. Conway20202027Appointed by Tony Evers
Green 1Faun Marie Phillipson20212027
2Thomas J. Vale20092027
Lafayette Duane M. Jorgenson20152027
Rock 1Karl R. Hanson20182025Appointed by Scott Walker
2Derrick A. Grubb20182025Appointed by Scott Walker
3Jeffrey S. Kuglitsch20172030Appointed by Scott Walker
4Ashley Morse20222029Appointed by Tony Evers
5Mike Haakenson20152027
6John M. Wood20162029Appointed by Scott Walker
7Barbara W. McCrory20122030
Sauk 1Michael P. Screnock20152028Appointed by Scott Walker
2Wendy J. N. Klicko20162028
3Patricia A. Barrett20182030Blake J. Duren taking office Aug. 1, 2024

District 6

Eliminated by order of the Wisconsin Supreme Court, effective July 31, 2018. [15]

District 7

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Adams 1Daniel Glen Wood20152027
2Tania M. Bonnett 20222028
Buffalo – Pepin Thomas W. Clark20182030
Clark 1Lyndsey Boon Brunette20182030
2William Bratcher20232029
Crawford Lynn Marie Ryder20162028
Grant 1Lisa A. Riniker20232029
2Craig R. Day20092027
Iowa Matt Allen 20222028
Jackson 1Anna L. Becker20142027Appointed by Scott Walker
2Daniel Diehn20212027
Juneau 1Stacy A. Smith20182030
2Paul S. Curran20082026
La Crosse 1Ramona A. Gonzalez19952025
2Elliott Levine20072025
3Mark A. Huesmann20232030Appointed by Tony Evers
4Scott L. Horne20072025
5Gloria L. Doyle20152027
Monroe 1Todd L. Ziegler20072025
2Mark L. Goodman20102028
3Rick Radcliffe20172030Appointed by Scott Walker
Pierce Elizabeth Rohl20212028Appointed by Tony Evers
Richland Lisa McDougal20222029Appointed by Tony Evers
Trempealeau Rian W. Radtke20172029
Vernon Timothy J. Gaskell20232029

District 8

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Brown 1Donald R. Zuidmulder19972027
2Thomas J. Walsh20122030
3Tammy Jo Hock20122025Appointed by Scott Walker
4Kendall M. Kelley20022027Appointed by Scott McCallum
5Marc A. Hammer20082027Appointed by Jim Doyle
6John P. Zakowski20122030
7Timothy A. Hinkfuss20072025
8Beau G. Liegeois20192026Appointed by Tony Evers
Door 1D. Todd Ehlers20002030Jennifer Moeller taking office Aug. 1, 2024
2David L. Weber20162029Appointed by Scott Walker
Kewaunee Jeffrey R. Wisnicky 20222028
Marinette 1Jane M. Sequin20202026
2James A. Morrison20122025Appointed by Scott Walker
Oconto 1Michael T. Judge20072029
2Jay N. Conley20102028
Outagamie 1Mark McGinnis20052029
2Emily I. Lonergan20202026
3Mitchell J. Metropulos20072026Appointed by Jim Doyle
4Yadira Rein20212028Appointed by Tony Evers
5Carrie Schneider20172030Appointed by Scott Walker
6Vincent Biskupic20142027Appointed by Scott Walker
7Mark G. Schroeder20212028Appointed by Tony Evers
Waupaca 1Troy L. Nielsen20172029
2Vicki L. Clussman20142026
3Raymond S. Huber20002030

District 9

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Florence – Forest Leon D. Stenz20082026
Iron Anthony J. Stella Jr.20192026Appointed by Tony Evers
Langlade John Rhode20152027
Lincoln 1Galen Bayne-Allison 20222028
2Robert Russell20132025
Marathon 1Suzanne C. O'Neill20202027Appointed by Tony Evers
2Rick Cveykus20222028
3Lamont K. Jacobson20132026Appointed by Scott Walker
4Gregory J. Strasser20162029Appointed by Scott Walker
5Michael K. Moran20112029
6Scott M. Corbett20212027
Menominee – Shawano 1Katherine Sloma [16] [note 1] 20202027Appointed by Tony Evers
2William F. Kussel Jr.20112030
Oneida 1Michael W. Schiek20232029
2Michael H. Bloom20122030Mary M. Sowinski taking office Aug. 1, 2024
Portage 1Michael Zell20222029Appointed by Tony Evers
2 Louis J. Molepske Jr. 20222028
3Patricia Baker20202028Appointed by Tony Evers
Price Kevin G. Klein20172030Appointed by Scott Walker
Mark T. Fuhr taking office Aug. 1, 2024
Taylor Ann Knox-Bauer20082027Appointed by Jim Doyle
Vilas 1Martha Milanowski20212028Appointed by Tony Evers
2Daniel Overbey 20222028
Wood 1Gregory J. Potter20012026Appointed by Scott McCallum
2Nicholas J. Brazeau Jr.20112030Appointed by Scott Walker
3Todd P. Wolf20092027
4Timothy Gebert20232029

District 10

CircuitBranchJudgeEntered officeNext electionNotes
Ashland Kelly J. McKnight20182030
Barron 1James C. Babler20042028
2--Vacant--2030Samuel L. Lawton taking office Aug. 1, 2024
3Maureen D. Boyle20142026
Bayfield John P. Anderson20042027Appointed by Jim Doyle
Burnett Melissia R. Mogen20172029
Chippewa 1Steven H. Gibbs20172030
2James Isaacson20092027
3Benjamin Lane20202026
Douglas 1Kelly J. Thimm20092027
2George L. Glonek20022027Appointed by Scott McCallum
Dunn 1James M. Peterson20142026
2Christina Mayer20212027
3Luke M. Wagner20212027
Eau Claire 1John F. Manydeeds20162028
2Michael Schumacher20082026
3Emily M. Long20182030
4Jon M. Theisen20112030Appointed by Scott Walker
5Sarah Harless20182030
6Beverly Wickstrom 20222028
Polk 1Daniel J. Tolan20162029
2Jeffrey L. Anderson20112029
Rusk Annette Barna20222028
Sawyer 1John M. Yackel20152027
2Monica M. Isham20232029
St. Croix 1Scott J. Nordstrand20192026Appointed by Scott Walker
2Edward F. Vlack III20012025
3Scott R. Needham19942030
4R. Michael Waterman20152028Appointed by Scott Walker
Washburn Angeline E. Winton20202026

See also

Related Research Articles

In legal terminology, a complaint is any formal legal document that sets out the facts and legal reasons that the filing party or parties believes are sufficient to support a claim against the party or parties against whom the claim is brought that entitles the plaintiff(s) to a remedy. For example, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) that govern civil litigation in United States courts provide that a civil action is commenced with the filing or service of a pleading called a complaint. Civil court rules in states that have incorporated the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure use the same term for the same pleading.

A deposition in the law of the United States, or examination for discovery in the law of Canada, involves the taking of sworn, out-of-court oral testimony of a witness that may be reduced to a written transcript for later use in court or for discovery purposes. Depositions are commonly used in litigation in the United States and Canada. They are almost always conducted outside court by the lawyers themselves, with no judge present to supervise the examination.

Civil procedure is the body of law that sets out the rules and regulations along with some standards that courts follow when adjudicating civil lawsuits. These rules govern how a lawsuit or case may be commenced; what kind of service of process is required; the types of pleadings or statements of case, motions or applications, and orders allowed in civil cases; the timing and manner of depositions and discovery or disclosure; the conduct of trials; the process for judgment; the process for post-trial procedures; various available remedies; and how the courts and clerks must function.

A lawsuit is a proceeding by one or more parties against one or more parties in a civil court of law. The archaic term "suit in law" is found in only a small number of laws still in effect today. The term "lawsuit" is used with respect to a civil action brought by a plaintiff who requests a legal remedy or equitable remedy from a court. The defendant is required to respond to the plaintiff's complaint or else risk default judgment. If the plaintiff is successful, judgment is entered in favor of the plaintiff, and the Court may impose the legal and/or equitable remedies available against the defendant (respondent). A variety of court orders may be issued in connection with or as part of the judgment to enforce a right, award damages or restitution, or impose a temporary or permanent injunction to prevent an act or compel an act. A declaratory judgment may be issued to prevent future legal disputes.

In law, a summary judgment, also referred to as judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition, is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial. Summary judgments may be issued on the merits of an entire case, or on discrete issues in that case. The formulation of the summary judgment standard is stated in somewhat different ways by courts in different jurisdictions. In the United States, the presiding judge generally must find there is "no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." In England and Wales, the court rules for a party without a full trial when "the claim, defence or issue has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a trial."

A demurrer is a pleading in a lawsuit that objects to or challenges a pleading filed by an opposing party. The word demur means "to object"; a demurrer is the document that makes the objection. Lawyers informally define a demurrer as a defendant saying "So what?" to the pleading.

In United States law, a motion is a procedural device to bring a limited, contested issue before a court for decision. It is a request to the judge to make a decision about the case. Motions may be made at any point in administrative, criminal or civil proceedings, although that right is regulated by court rules which vary from place to place. The party requesting the motion is the moving party or movant. The party opposing the motion is the nonmoving party or nonmovant.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Discovery (law)</span> Pretrial procedure in common law countries for obtaining evidence

Discovery, in the law of common law jurisdictions, is a phase of pretrial procedure in a lawsuit in which each party, through the law of civil procedure, can obtain evidence from other parties by means of methods of discovery such as interrogatories, requests for production of documents, requests for admissions and depositions. Discovery can be obtained from nonparties using subpoenas. When a discovery request is objected to, the requesting party may seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion to compel discovery. Conversely, a party or nonparty resisting discovery can seek the assistance of the court by filing a motion for a protective order.

In U.S. law, a motion in limine is a motion, discussed outside the presence of the jury, to request that certain testimony be excluded. A motion in limine can also be used to get a ruling to allow for the inclusion of evidence. The motion is decided by a judge in both civil and criminal proceedings. It is frequently used at pre-trial hearings or during trial, and it can be used at both the state and federal levels.

The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure govern civil procedure in United States district courts. They are the companion to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Rules promulgated by the United States Supreme Court pursuant to the Rules Enabling Act become part of the FRCP unless, within seven months, the United States Congress acts to veto them. The Court's modifications to the rules are usually based upon recommendations from the Judicial Conference of the United States, the federal judiciary's internal policy-making body.

A legal case is in a general sense a dispute between opposing parties which may be resolved by a court, or by some equivalent legal process. A legal case is typically based on either civil or criminal law. In most legal cases, there are one or more accusers and one or more defendants. In some instances, a legal case may occur between parties that are not in opposition, but require a legal ruling to formally establish some legal facts.

The Virginia General District Court (GDC) is the lowest level of the Virginia court system, and is the court that most Virginians have contact with. The jurisdiction of the GDC is generally limited to traffic cases and other misdemeanors, civil cases involving amounts of under $25,000. There are 32 GDC districts, each having at least one judge, and each having a clerk of the court and a courthouse with courtroom facilities.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L.Tooltip Public Law  104–67 (text)(PDF), 109 Stat. 737 ("PSLRA") implemented several substantive changes in the United States that have affected certain cases brought under the federal securities laws, including changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation, and awards fees and expenses.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New York City Criminal Court</span> Court in New York, United States

The Criminal Court of the City of New York is a court of the State Unified Court System in New York City that handles misdemeanors and lesser offenses, and also conducts arraignments and preliminary hearings in felony cases.

The legal system of South Korea is a civil law system that has its basis in the Constitution of the Republic of Korea. The Court Organization Act, which was passed into law on 26 September 1949, officially created a three-tiered, independent judicial system. The revised Constitution of 1987 codified judicial independence in Article 103, which states that, "Judges rule independently according to their conscience and in conformity with the Constitution and the law." The 1987 rewrite also established the Constitutional Court, the first time that South Korea had an active body for constitutional review.

A private prosecution is a criminal proceeding initiated by an individual private citizen or private organisation instead of by a public prosecutor who represents the state. Private prosecutions are allowed in many jurisdictions under common law, but have become less frequent in modern times as most prosecutions are now handled by professional public prosecutors instead of private individuals who retain barristers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States magistrate judge</span> Judges appointed to assist at US federal district courts

In United States federal courts, magistrate judges are judges appointed to assist U.S. district court judges in the performance of their duties. Magistrate judges generally oversee first appearances of criminal defendants, set bail, and conduct other administrative duties. The position of magistrate judge or magistrate also exists in some unrelated state courts .

The Virginia Circuit Courts are the state trial courts of general jurisdiction in the Commonwealth of Virginia. The Circuit Courts have jurisdiction to hear civil and criminal cases. For civil cases, the courts have authority to try cases with an amount in controversy of more than $4,500 and have exclusive original jurisdiction over claims for more than $25,000. In criminal matters, the Circuit Courts are the trial courts for all felony charges and for misdemeanors originally charged there. The Circuit Courts also have appellate jurisdiction for any case from the Virginia General District Courts claiming more than $50, which are tried de novo in the Circuit Courts.

Civil discovery under United States federal law is wide-ranging and can involve any material which is relevant to the case except information which is privileged, information which is the work product of the opposing party, or certain kinds of expert opinions. Electronic discovery or "e-discovery" is used when the material is stored on electronic media.

The Florida Constitution, in Article V, Section 2(a), vests the power to adopt rules for the "practice and procedure in all courts" in the Florida Supreme Court. The Florida Supreme Court adopted the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure in March 1954. The proper abbreviation for the rules is Fla.R.Civ.P. The rules may be amended, or new rules added, from time to time and upon the approval of the Florida Supreme Court.

References

  1. ↑ "The Judiciary". Wisconsin Blue Book 2019-2020 (Report). Madison, Wisconsin: State of Wisconsin. 2019. pp. 268–271. Retrieved January 1, 2020.
  2. ↑ Vetterkind, Riley (March 6, 2020). "Tony Evers signs bill adding 12 circuit court branches". Wisconsin State Journal . Retrieved March 6, 2020.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 "Wisconsin Court System - Circuit courts". wicourts.gov.
  4. ↑ "Wisconsin Court System - Commercial Docket Pilot Project". www.wicourts.gov. Retrieved 2019-04-06.
  5. ↑ "Solutions The Need for Speed: Commercial Court Open for Business". WisBar. Retrieved 2019-04-06.
  6. ↑ "Wisconsin Expands the Commercial Docket Pilot Project to All Wisconsin Counties – Business Courts Blog" . Retrieved 2019-04-06.
  7. ↑ Supreme Court of Wisconsin (March 13, 2020). "In re creation of a pilot project for dedicated trial court judicial dockets for large claim business and commercial cases (Dane County), No. 16-05C" (PDF).
  8. ↑ Supreme Court of Wisconsin (June 29, 2022). "In re creation of a pilot project for dedicated trial court judicial dockets for large claim business and commercial cases, No. 16-05D" (PDF).
  9. ↑ "Wisconsin Court System - Circuit court forms". www.wicourts.gov.
  10. ↑ "Wisconsin Court System -". www.wicourts.gov.
  11. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Committee of Chief Judges". Wisconsin Court System. Retrieved May 6, 2024.
  12. ↑ "Gov. Evers appoints Jack Dávila as circuit judge in Milwaukee County". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel . April 9, 2020. Retrieved April 10, 2020.
  13. 1 2 Vielmetti, Bruce (September 22, 2020). "Evers appoints a former legislator and a public defender as judges in Milwaukee County". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel . Retrieved September 22, 2020.
  14. ↑ Vielmetti, Bruce (April 2, 2019). "Danielle Shelton ousts short-term incumbent Andrew Jones on Milwaukee County Circuit Court". Milwaukee Journal Sentinel . Retrieved March 4, 2022.
  15. ↑ "Judiciary" (PDF). Wisconsin Blue Book 2019-2020 (Report). Madison, Wisconsin: State of Wisconsin. 2019. p. 268. Retrieved April 7, 2020.
  16. ↑ "Sloma named circuit court judge for Shawano-Menominee counties". Wisconsin Law Journal. July 6, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2020.

Notes

  1. ↑ Tony A. Kordus was elected in the 2020 election but declined to serve.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.